■tjfuu, it) for uhatfia/ltefionJ 4*t on fuAfittLmOt, RMvtd, that V troops of tk: L HUed itat;s, ui comm.to with all the creditors of the lame, hsve an u«doubte4 right to expett fuc,h lecurity ; and !£ , 0 "?r ,V '' «» I,keev * r y ef fori in their power to obtain from f Jf , P e^ lve toatei, lubftantial funds, adequate to the obi a ot fund lug the w.iole debt of the UMl.ed States, and will enter upon dn immediate ana tutl confider«tio»of the nature of such funds, toe n.o mode of obtaining them." Nothing can more cieai .y appear, than that at the time of thei'e resolutions, Congrcfs MJafidcud .he Uobt due to the army for pay and depreciation ot jay, as well as that due to their other creditors, as the particular L '"'^ d States.—Hete was no pretenccof denying the contrast or turning them over to the S.ates for payment. It is true, Congrds in thalercfolutiotu call upon the individual States, to fettle with their lines of the arm) to a given day, but the pay JS to come trom adequate funds to be provided by the efforts of ongre s romtlie teveral Stales. Iu obedienceto this requisition, the Stales proceed to the fcttlemerif, not only of the Day to the -lines of the army,lnn alto of the claims of their citizens for fuppliet Turnithed to contiadlors, comm lfane, and quarter-matters witli all their holt ot-deprndants, and'ec lifieaies of the balances due to them, were given under the direftionof the States individually, who thereby agietably to the foregoing resolutions, became fecu nty to tlx creditors, on hehalf of the confederated government, * >at thetrdebis should be paid. Congress immediately proceed ed to demand of the kveral States, an import of 5 per cent, ad va lorem os all goods, wares and merchandizes, imported into the United States, and, additional fuins for 25 years, adequate to the payment of the intrrtft of the whole debt agreeably to. their affur. ances in answer to the memorial if the army. Some of the Stat** compßed with this requisition, and provided supplementary hinds ovcd and above the impoll tor 25 years -but others refuting, the whole pcoj'ett wis rendered abortive and the creditors of the union left in the most diftrefling circumftancej. • ihe clamours ot the citizcns wete too great to be withilood bv manpof the States yvhoconfidered themfetves as sureties for the •united States, and indeed under aneceflityof rendering foine im mediate, tuo' partial fupplies,to prevent everything running into <onfuiion. They thereupon undertook tq pay their own citizens Jie inieretl due on their refpeftive certificates, whether given by 1 ie Ipecial oflirer* of Congrets (as the coramitiioners ot loan) or under the dircrtion of the Itandard before mentioned. The State «>l Ncw-Jeifev in this way paid five years intertft, to the amount <11 leveral hundred thousand dollars. But although th ■Ir partial 1 ayments put the evil day farther otf, yet the time at last came ' w ' len goud We ps tlie people, finding the government una l ie to support Itfclt and comply with their engagements, and fee ing nothing but ruin aud confufioii before tiiem, wifely brought about another revolution, and formed a new conaitution founded on a more intimate union us the (e*eral States, with greater and more efficient powers for the purpole of ejUbliJhing jujlt. t , infurinr ttouvjiic ttanijuUity r j)romotfng the general wtjare tnJfeturui' the blel- J:ngJ Itj liberty. J Provision was'alfo rxprefsly made, that all dibts and engage njents binding on the lormer government, lhoold be equally va lid againll the prcftnt. Under this new conUuution, the govern ment is veftcd 111 the fullelt manner with all the resources and funds necelfary for the paymrnt of the general debt of the union, »nd what thej had in vain asked of the several Slates under the former conlorieration. Ol course (he individual Stale was de prived of them, and no longer had it in her power to continue her partial aids towards fatisfying the growing interest on the de mands of their citizens. Iri this foliation, and under these circumstances, our creditors cams forward, with the evidences of their demands given hy the individual State by order ot the United States in Con<refs af lemblcd, and demand payment of us, as their original debtor, lor whom they performed the services and to whom they granted thefupplies, allcrfging that by the transfer of the revenues and /efources ot government from the refpe&ive States (o us, their fe curtty is invalidated and we arc become able to pay them, agreea bly to the fpint of our original contract. These quMlions then lairlv arise, Was the contrail originally ouri, or were the United States the original debtor ?— if so, has the creditor been paid his jull due, or lias he releafctl us from thr obligation ? There caibe no doubt in my opinion, from the foregoing view of the circumlfance! of the cale ; and 1 believe no gentleman will deny, but that we are the original debtors as reprelcniin- (he for mer government. It is asclear that all the creditor has received for his demand .*ias been a ceitifi-atc from the Stat--, tellifyiug a certain bailee' die to him for his Cervices, or for supplies rendered. And here J should enter into the argument, to (hew that (his certificate from the State cannot on any principles of jujiice, honor or po/ict be considered as payment, was not already done to mv band in language so much more"forcible than any I can use on ibis occasion, and the omiflion of which would be impnfing on tiie committe-. This will be found in the 322 d and 413 th pages o( the Congrrllional Register, where an Mr jVladilon) in (peaking on the lubjeft of public certificates, thou gh to another point, favs, " Let us consider firll by whom the debt was contracted, and then to whom it is due. The debt was con tracted by the United States, who with refpeft to that particular tranfa&ion were in a national capacity. The government was no thing more than the agent or organ by which the whole body of the people attcd. The charigeiri the government which has taken place, has enlarged its national capacity, but it has not varied the national obligation with refpeft to the engagements entered into by that transition—for in like manner the present government is noshing more than ihe organ or agent of the public. There is 110 change in our political duty nor In the moral or political ob ligation—The language I now use is the language of the conftitu. tion itfelf—itdeclarts that all debts Ihjll have the fame validity agamft the United Statu, under the new asunder theoldf.rmof government—The obligation remains the lame, though 1 hope ex perience will prove that the ability has been favorably varied." —Again a debt was fairly contracted ; according to juftjee and good faith it ought to have been' paid in gold or Tilv cr. A piece of paper was only fubltituted. Was this paper equal to gold or silver ? No ; it was worth in the market no more than oue eighth or one seventh of that value. Was this depreciated paper freelv acceptcd ?No ; the government offered thai or nothing. The re lation of the individual to the government and circumstances of the offer, rendered the acceptance a forced, not a tree one. Again —" Here there debt acknowledged to have been once due, and which w"asne\er discharged, because the payment was fo'ccd and defective ; the balance consequently is. ftili due, and is of as facrcd a natuic as the claims of the holders can be. ThefeconcJu five arguments agply with double force to the question before the committee. Was the debt contra&ed by the United States ? If so where have they any evidence of payment ? If it is answered in the ftatc certificates, I reply, a piece of paper was only substituted lor the bare purpose of afccitaining the balanee as preparatory to its being funded,and that by the particular order of Cougrefs,un der the idea of providing the creditor with fecur-ity for his debts. Was this paper equal to gold and silver or any other substantial pay ment ? The relation oT the individual to the government and cir cuipftances of the offer, rendered the acceptance s forced, not a free one. But, fir, a part of the is still unenfwerecl. It is {aid that if thefc are debts of the United States in the hands of individual citizens, niujl they not be the debts of the United States in the Treasuries of the different states. I auffrer by no means. This argument is cxtremclyj fallacious.. Iri common life, if.anv person who becomes my fecaritv, pays the debt for me and he owes me money. J can with propriety refufe to'-pay- him till he fct tks.|ais debt with me ; but if such fecuriiy icfufes, or is unabJed to pay the dclt to my Creditor, I certainly have no to put off .my creditor till the security (hall have paid me what he may owe me. * (To continued.) MONDAY, JUNE 21, 1790. THE bill to etlabiifli the Poll-Office and Port; Roads in the United States, was brought in engrofled, and read the third time. The blanks were filled up.—The fine for detaining the mail was set at a funi not exceeding 5 dollars for every halt hour. The falaryof the Post-Master-Gener al 1600 dollars—Alfiftant 1000 dollars—Deputy Pott-Matters 20 pr. cent, on the pottage of letters received at their refpe<ftive offices.—The blanks being filled up, the bill was palled. Reports from the Secretary at War on sundry petitions were read. The bill for repealing after thelaftdayof the duties heretofore laid on spirits, &c. was ta ken into consideration.—The queltion was, whe ther the bill fhould*be engrofled. Mr. Stone observed, that no man could be more in favar of making provision for the debt of the United States, than himfelf—but the present bill pointed out a mode which he conceived to be the worst that could be devised—the mod exception able, and would turn out the most unprodu«fiive. He ffiould therefore vote against the bill on a full conviction that other funds, entirely unexcept ionable, might be found, and which might be contained perhaps in a quarter of a Iheet of pa per. Hefaid he should call for the Ayes and Noes. Mr. Carrol observed, that as so much time had been taken up in maturing the bill, he hoped that it would pass to be engrofled—the business is of very great importance, and ought now to be finilhed. He wished therefore that the Ayes and Noes might not be called in the present ttage of the bill, as it would not, he conceived, answer the purpose intended by the gentleman. Mr. Stone withdrew his motion. Mr. Bloodworth renewed the motion, but as. terwatds he withdrew it. Mr. Page said he hoped that the Ayes and Noes would be called. - Mr. Jackson was also in favor of coming to ai: ultimate dccifio'n on the bill. Mr. Gerry said if there is a majority of the house who are determined to reje(A the bill, he could not feeof.whatufeit was to have itengfofled. Mr. Fitzfimpns said he had observed, that if this bill ihould be-*eje<aed, there would be great dif ficulty in finding other resources He wilhed that the House would now decide npon it. Mr. Vining spake in favor of the bill, and was Tor trying theitrength of the house on the quef ion, and in that; view >vas in favor of calling the iyct and Noes. Thequeftion on engroffin? the .ill was deterwmed in the negative, as follow • Meflrs Brown, Cadw<ader, Carrol, Contee r itzlimoils, Ployd, bolter, Gale, Gilnwir, Griffin' Hartley, Heifter, Lee, Livermore, Madison, p' Muhlenberg, Seney, Sherman, Sinnjekfon, Smith (M.) Vimng, White, Willi am foil 22. NOES. Meflrs Ames, Afhe, Baldwin, Benfon, Blood worth, Burke, Coles, Gerry, Goodhue, Grout, Hathorne, Huger, Huntington, Taction, Law ranee, Leonard, Matthews, Moore, Page, Parker Partridge, Itenfellaer, Scot, Smith, (S C.) Sevier, Steele, Stone, Sturges Sumpter, Thatcher, Trumbull, Tucker, Wads' worth .35. ' By this vote, the bill was loft. Mr. Kitzfimons moved that a committee fliould be appointed todevife a plan for payment of the interelt on the debt of the United States This motion was agreed to—and the followingeentle n'en -viz. Mr.Fitzfimons, Mr.Madiron Mr. Sedgwick, Mr. Sherman, Mt. Tucker. ' A meilage was received from the Senate in ormingthat they have concurred in the vote of the house, of the Bth inft. for appointiug a joint committee toconfider and determine on 1 proper Um tr f or , t . 1 . , . e r ad j° ur n me nt, and that they have palled a bill for fettling the claims of John Mc Coid, with amendments. In committee of rhe whole on the amendatory bill, providing for the settlement of accounts be tween the United States and individual States T , , A Mr. Seney in the Chair. The firft clause provides for encreafingthenuni ber °to J 6 niß lonerS from 3' the prefent num. Mr. Foller moved that the words, « two Com miffioners in addition to" should be ttruck out Mr Lawrance objected to the motion. He ob lervedthat very exteiifive powers were given to these comnulhoners-the objects on whfch they are to decide are of the utmoil importance-and he thought that { con.miffioners wiuld give more frttisfaftion to the people than 3 Mr. Livermore was in favor of the motion— He thought the business would be procrastinated 111 proportion to the number.— 1 hree has lippn ti 10 fh ght [ uffic!ent —" ot hing new has been offered to ftiew that any more are necefiary. If the num ber was encreafed to 60, he thought it wou,d only enibarrafs the more.—He considered the addition as an indiretft impeachment of the tren tlemen now in office-he had never heard^y 498 AYES. fault found with them—he believed thev competent to the bufinefs.—lf we make the a? (lition, what has been done, may be all loft i„u If 3 would finifh the business in 3 years he 1 J no doubt that 5 would take J years. ' Mr. Williamfon said he differed from the « tlenian lalt speaking, in refpetf to the addition to the board's being an impeachment or imnm tion on the gentlemen now in office. The powers proposed to be veiled,are much mm extenfive than tliofe by the former bill— w u- f renders it expedient that the number fhould'v, encreafed—that more accurate information f r " various parts of the Union may be collected"— He said he had the highelt opinion of the prefer, Coinmiflionei s—they were gentlemen whose a i C lities were undoubtedly refpedtable—but he couW not conceive that their abilities or importan would be leflened or depreciated by the pronnfj addition. ea Mr. Livermore made some reply to Mr.\Vili; am son The motion for ftrikingout was neo-,' lived. o a " On motion, of Mr. Sherman, the 6tli fe<fli on Wa amended to read thus—That the States who fiall have balances placed to their credit on the books of theTreafury of the United States, shall with , i" after the fame fliall have been ere" dited, be entitled to have the fame funded upon the fame terms as the other debts of the n n Lj States. uca Mr. Smith, (S. C.) moved thatthe claufewhich deprives the States of the power of transferino the debts due to them from the United States should be (truck out. He observed that he could fee no reason for the prohibition—it appears ab. surd that a State should not have it in its power to transfer its demands against the United States to its creditors.—He wished that gentlemen would assign the reafoijsfor the clause. Mr. Sedgwick said he would give the reafon it was to prevent increasing the demands against the United States, in the hands of foreigners - This was a desirable obje<ft, and ought to be at tended to as far as pollible.—ln refpedt to tha domestic debt, it was to be lamented, that so much ofit was in the hands of foreigners— this however could not be prevented ; but with refpeft to the present cafe, it may be done without any injury whatever—and therefore we ought to extend the prohibition a« far as we can confident with juitice Mr. Sherman spake against the motion. Mr. Smith supported his motion He (hewed the inconvenience and expence that would attend the double operation of the Stares' firft recei*in<r their mtereft, and then paying it to their credi » tors He further observed that it v; as treating the States like children—individuals may transfer their demands-but the States are I)ot so to be trusted.— He added other remarks—v hen the question being taken, motion was 1011. Mr. Sedgwick moved thal , he clause be amended to reau,—and no debt due to any parti cular State, frail be transferable. This wasa greed to. I he c,,au(e which provides for paying the clerks 500 d ollars from the time of their appointment, was amended by striking out the last words " from Me time of their appointment." The Committee rose and reported the bill with the amendments. The amendment refpeifting the Clerks was ob jetted to by Mr. Seney—it was however agreed to by the House. 6 Mr, Jackion moved that the clause, determin mg the rule of apportionment, in the following wous, <c The rule for apportioning to the States the expences of the war, ihaJl be the fame that is prescribed by the Constitution of the United tates or the apportionment of representation and direvft taxes, and according to the firft enu meration that shall be made," should beftruckout —and called for the Ayes and Noes—which are as follow : AYES. Meflrs Afhe Baldwin, Floyd, Foster, Gilman, Hathor"?, Jackson, Lawrance, Livermore, Sedg- Merti s Arries, Benfon, Blood worth, Boudinot, Brown, Burke, Cadwallader, Carrol, Coles, Con tee, Htzfimons, Gale, Goodhue, Griffin, Grout, ei rer, Huger, Huntington, Leonard, Madison, Mulilenburg, Moore, Fage, Partridge, Renfellaer, .reman, Scot, Seney, Sherman, Sylvester, Sinu.ckfon, Smith(M.) Smith(S.C.) Sevier, Steele, atone, Sturges, Sumpter, Thatcher, Trumbull, ' I ucker, Vining, Wadsworth, White, William ion ' ' A clause was proposed by Mr. Tucker, for con tinuing the salaries of the Commissioners to the i , , altho the accounts should be fettled prior to that period. The firft part was agreed to—from the word « altho" to the end, was negatived. A motion was made by Mr. Steele to amend the cJaule which refpeds the claims of the States, to ltr.ke out the word « was" before the word ex v'[ed > a, . ,fl t0 "ifert the words " /hall be."— J his motion was negatived. —-It was then vo ted that the bill be engrofled for a third reading to-morrow. Adjourned. NOES.
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers