Tli.- Jnd chare.) tUf ur that ! ! alus-neo f material itni-sse an.l asked i;.., wasitmev ini!ivriini eiiiliv.i-c l.i lar- fr aa attachment for witnesses anil a ! defendants rum-si in th within etition I We (lie wilwrnlier. theennnsel for tin-, pressed an opinion. I re-.il the r..s-, j " V 7 j v i .'() j ( j. r-. I tiiink 1 could g into the jury ; ' lie' aecort.iig th: lai r out-; ij :: at a jury th.y nm-t weigh the If: i iiony and os.a-riit.il. not ho nroke o-n l!;c-ar, but lio n -ok the randy and nMM.:t.-? Smeof the gm Is were found on ,!. u,vs (lie tin rc fact that liii Ix'.vs ww in the car i? no proof ileil tiny t.iok the ZrU. The '.iliinio.iw.-iihh must prove the hoys took tin- ml". T iniivict y..u must li- aiiii-il beyond a reasonable doubt lliat tlio lmy !. the eMl. The jury having gone t- li"'"' r,("" f"r dciiifr.ilioti, T li - j:jry in the ctse of c m- -i.l. .- - I ' II 0..,f..r.l U'-IS tllll- Illor.i-. can . ts. . . . o 1 into Ifin box. i in' li-slimony in mis n-was published in vester-lay's Hi i: vu.. T:i arirmiiLMil hi. ii liail ifu posfpoii- Till! irlA i pip. iiliiiuanc of the case. Attachment 'do hereby certify and declare upon o'lrjK.-c an.l fit l.-r :i vi awarded for Henry Apel ami Nettie Sul-; honor a attorneys that in our opinions, j the ev idemc. Ac-.-; led aim swum I) van, ami continuance of trial refused. : after careful examination of the cases of j i leiscl I have heard some of tl Messrs. I'iil ami HolU-rt of counsel for j the respective defendant, tin.- justice in caMC )M;t 1UV(. n formed an i.pim n i" THE i CCViL.MNTo BY I left-use then filed the follow ing litotion ' the aliove r.vse nvpiires that the defend- j topiied niy ni' "sp i r iH-fme liii- oe- for a cliantre of venue. C'oiiiinonwealtli of l'a., No. "i. May jant.i itlmuM I liie'l neparakiy f.r the j rmil. An-cj.te.l ami ti . .i i r. i... .in e l was o..,,.e . i.v u, . .... ... ... tlu, pjintf to llie court ; 1. Thit tlinv iun b na.nri tint Imve lt-n put furtli. a.-? lhas. .!. Uwis, et. al. J limitary. . p,.,,,,,.,, ,,as!i ami if thire shonhilK-a j..i.i 7".i (ic iiii.irti.Vi' fAc Jitthj, i ( t!f jurt ,i,.r , ,f tUlenilaiitn. or any of them, there ly.T mn! 'J'rniiiti r Hint (Ism ml Jml V- mi1(.t In- matter limnht in lithaif of the '"''r.', '"''" ' "f Suim-if., Sal-- "I .Mf. t li :i t will lie to !lio prejnilii-e of the 'itnmiii. lutheis-. A. C II"' .in.!;!", The defendants in the aimvo ea.i hy ! j 1V j., .luhn II. I 'm., their attorneys, John 11.1'iil and Ilollieit, eonio into eourt, this the onvietion in tli'. eve fur Ki-Slin li -i ir witlmn. !Uvnnf, insaiil'l.'b ai theaet of M ly KS,", provides I'isit dn:!?fisti and atnthiv.iries shall not Court that a thtinjr of nun- ' "ranted in said -j?o for the may he ; fnMowiiiL' Attorneys fr 1 i."eiid.iiits. iiIiukk ok tiii; c ii i:r. May L'stli, 1SS.I. Mesrs. HotlH-rt and T'hl apivar for all tin-defendants. The motion to sever is refused. Per Curiam W.J. i!u:ii, P.J. The counsel for the Nicely brothers filed a motion asking that the case azainst the Nirely'n be taken up before , f.r),.k ChalienLi-l bv defense. dt,fen(j. prt'vails agaiiist the said defendants; and i ,i10 ,.as(. t)f i.,; et al. The C'oiimion-1 .; j Auirustine Have heard and in consequence ol sm n prevailing exene- wi aiti, opiiosmi this motion was over-: nw,j a ,.n.at aHI1it the case but rea ms : lt. In tlio comity when the crime was committed for which the defendants i stand indicted, ti) wit: The counlv of i .- i : . .,.l..r 11,., Is" luroipure., o ne -!Soim.rset i.l, U1llle excitement revision oi ints aci ; aiei iuk uiiiminn dieted evidence shows that the ant was a drii.yit having a certificate of OTiiiH-tcncv from the .State Phaimacu- ilir-iiid. ; Philip Weiscl. -!; a 1 ii iiliin'. and heard nothing h;:il the c.i--. ' i.i.! ! xside by the t ...miiiou Aeahh. I.ulher ! :i!l. 1 Live re.ni a'lont th' iise, but li:ne not made up any p:-,r!icu- j lar opinion. 1 think, alter hearing t!ie tesi.iiiiniiv in t!u' i n:"', I 1'ii'iM n ii'li r an i;n;iarti:il verdict. 'hal!eni.i f..r r.m. I're.terii k !.'. J'hail'cr. ! la-, e re id m.th i;iL'. but have heard htile all in'nt his cas-. Stool aside by the ('oiiuiion wealth. P.ivi l J. W.ilfersl-r-jer.- H.iven't read very much but. have hear I a i-ood tut aUuit this ease. Have partly ma le up my mind but could render an imoaitial verdict. Am a carpenter and live in CROt.iN ASSA'-iSATiON CVJE. I D2NT OF T HE PiBUCAT ll ; HI r .-lit in liar V II .mil c.ltttaii r..ruia!U rr-sl-,l, j ,-,1 ii:i M".mIt 'il I cifiiil.-,! Mtt II. .i! 'lie- Aillhe.-l: ies 111 rlaiiii 1-.. :: Uimiv. !?:: i.f ihi, Alii-r- ' in. r Hi I . t ih. A-tv.ii.ix'.i tt : i i n v . Vi ni-:bt th l!i. M -At I i-;l:t tii- t.-iliio; the i:i.-:i-.-a i n.t. ; M " ' f.,.. , i, t ;j lie I r- Mill .iv:s.el:iil. 11 v.-u ax.lt t-.e ' '" T" .'" 1'. '"'' ! i ,.l..,.,..T..i.......H-l..r;.v, tVil.iv. ; ...the p;. ;.J I f v pi,,,,,!-,,,, at, I d,,,i . I,.-M. c- j ; ' 'L. i,!""ri,r- ;v u!h. r:m::; . : ju-w:..,..f i .-t Tt-illT:i I ir.iltr. v. t.- ..r tin- t.i-1 ( "I..- i'l p.r. ..nl'ill"" Li t t.l iiia!v l-c: I ici T w v. M iv n-ii. h-- ill tic.il Kxainiiiinjj li.iard, the verdict must lie not Riiilty. J. That as there is no cimnt in the in dictment charh'iu the defendant as a druist with any violation of the stat u:e. the vjrdicl must be not guilty. The court icfused to allirm the points an I sai l : " The two points: raise a ipies ti.m whether on this indictment the de feii l.iul c:i! 1 c uiv'u tcd. The jniints , i ., .. .- r i .. ;ll a-,, ri-ln-ieii. Htlil llie iiir.-snoii in mi 1),- July considered on a future motion n:-cess.iry. Mr. Knoll':; addressed tin- jury at length sayiui that under existing law certain jK-rsons are allowed to sell spirit it ms and vinous li.ju irs under certain res'i-ctions and ipulilii-atioii". lie then to i' up the evidence of several witness.- claiiiiiiu t'.iat not one of them sustained the cliarg-s of the Commonwealth, lie was particularly severe in his criti.-is n on the attempt to convict mi such testi inonv as was oller-d. He held that IJ. il licit' evidence am unit -d to nothing in view, 1st. of hiso.vu alaiittel ceil tiou for t!i three months spccilied : 2-1. Pevanst? of his connection with Mr. P.-iif.ir l as his coun-s-1 ; ilrd. P.i-canseof the person ii dilli.-u'.ty now betneeii tlieiu involving a it:t in court. Val. May com iiented at large on the pvideiice, ridiculing the i lea that the ad liiKtures were b iu glit as mi- liciu and i-sss ia'ly in su. h ipi iotities as pint, 1 j.int, etc. Slid "liictors' prescriptinns" was simply a do lge to g-t whisky. In i nentiiig on llolbert'sevideiice w hich was so severely criticis.-.l by opposing counsel, s.ii l be was u w a reformed man. and his evidence was intitled to fill en-dene , and though not mi fiicn.l ly t-'tnis with I', -nr.ir l at present it iih-s not foiloA- thai he would jierjure lnni-ta-lf in this or anv other exse, being an honorable member of this bar. llie j-iry in the lli.-r and P.roderick c:isi-s returned a verdict of not guilty. luent, the defendants aforesaid w ill 1-e j r,m.,i .tll(i Li,u Yoder case ordered for unable to secure a fair and impartial trial. ; tr j., j 2nd. In the county of Somerset ufore- j T1C. Prosceuting Altorm-y ilien read said, to wit: The county in which H' ; inlit-Ji'iit to tlie prisoners who sep otl'ense for which the defendants stand ; anite!v and jointly plead '"not guilty." indicted, as aforesaid, was committed, fhet'icrk was instructed to call a jury. there exists so great a prejudice against j ,,..,..., inror's name, was called lie the defendants aforesaid, that they cannot obtain a fair trial. :. In the county in which the offense for which defendants stand indicted was committed, as aforesaid, there exists a jj. combination against, said defendants, in Utigated by inlhe iitlal H-rsons, by reason of which combination the defendants aforesaid cannot obtain a fair trial. They j tj. uviilence. therefore pray that the case may be re-: fynst-. moved to another county in w hich su- h . jln, Miller. Head about the i-ase prejudice, etc., do not exist, Hint tliey ! )llt f, .riiif 1 no opinion of the guilt or in- th i nk I could render an impartial ver dict after hearing the evidence. Chal lenged h- defense. J. J. Shaffer. Ila 1 not made up his i mind or expressed an opinion. Accepted I J. Y. Kaulz. Have expresse.l an opin- will ever pray, Ac. C. J. I.KWIS, J. P. Si luv.w, Mak-iiai. Si i. i iv s, his Ii:i ati i: X T i-ki s mai k (ii: r Ikix, Wm. 11 11.1., his Jkhiiyimaxcs Thomas, mark C.v!:::v: P.. Amikuson. Sworn and sulisi-rilied ts-fore me, this the 2.;d day of May, A. !. Is'.t. 1). .1. IIouxk::. .nil teiii!-r h-s laiui a.iv Un c.vl. l : 'A i w!ic.i-i!:o;i!,. it is .--tir:t. !v !;.i..,"i ti- tt I'.-t.-r V.-te-i !.::. th P'oi cl. Ii-io.i til l' U : snmh win- i-mi-i-jiI "f !-i'c- prri ; cij.:ii I'. i- "or m t a asin.iUon. i-. i'ou : fm.-.l i-i on.- of lie- .lark c. il- l n- aJi lii -i .1. -t.-tive 1. ;.a; lio.-nt in ih.- i ity Imll. ; N.i aM- nr.t has si lar b s-n mail.- to pot ; him ""o:i Hi rack" or in the sweat U-.i, ! the antler i i.-s p;-f, rr. I'.g to a lit t nr- th.-r .l.-v-l .pin -Ml- b-tor.- ulijce'iiig him to an 111. , u i-lt . .11. Tli-- fact is tla.t til v i are more tli. in a little in doulu as to the 1 grounil to -v are t readme .-li. M-av tlian i one pronuiii n: otHcial i-ouinrted w ith the deiart:;i-ut has tiiesti.'ii-sl very se riouiv v lid in-r any rcao.iai.'i' g'-oinel exi-i--. for 31- tic lian'; ari-i-l. nn-l th- v ' are not v.-rv backwar-l alu.ut i'iris.i3i j tli.' opinion li'.al -honl I lie- i. rove prove j riL.ni... il v. i'l Ii.. iiiil"or;..iu:i.- for s cacti juror s name was calleit tie as j ,, jn r,-.,,r,l t the guiit or hiii.m ence t. , (,-, ,:mt .n nt an I for the int. re ts of sworn or aflirmed uri.l interrogated as to ! of t1(, prjs.,,,,, hut think I could iu-ti.v as it will proc forliina!--for th his eligibility to serve in the case Wore Kailt.r at, i,n,ar,ial verdict after hearing j '''V X" ""Ihf, the court. The following gentlemen the ,.vi,lenee. Accepted. j and inils . nance, were called: i John Fnd.sley. I l ive heard a good , , n!i!i:i ti:t in ..iifin -n I. Ni-Imiii P.aker. Ih-ad the llt i: M I' and . jj. al ,,,ve made no mv mind ; could I , t cliv. - ( mi ;h!m is till- I h ';.- l up not go into the jurv box and render an j at tin- llarrisoc. s:.,-, t imi..ii. I.ut he has . ,. ., . . , ; n i i-oM.ii .1 w ith coiivcni. in - s in ih- impartial verdict. (. ha Merged for c.i'isi'. j i, , K . , ,f tnr!::!ure and U-d.t.ng. whid, Chas. V". Weiglc Had heard ot the j (l .'( ,,, ,,,iti,it.- the iliscoinlort of Ins case, but had expre-sed no opinion. Ac- 1 confinement. A.-inniiug t the authoii- eepted and atiirme,!. """ "" "''', ""t , I" 1 nant ' . ... , ., , , , , cliai'ge "f the station, has Ihvii ".-.i il. S. alter. I lave heard and r-;'-' ; ,,, ,,, r-.- w ith him during Hie .lay. about the case, but l.iue i:.-t n a-le upniy ; jj. t ,it t!:at P. . Suiinan. the n of the i ma;i. had 1-ceii arre-t.-.l on Mi.pici.m inn.i .-nt to lncrrts t. aitnou 'ii h" l- pri.soners. v Iialienge.l Ly Helens... , u.yU r u .,,.,..,. :. w,lM ,:,k,. Henry P.ockes. I lave not made "p j jt in..s-.ih!e i" r him to leave the city, mv mind in re-nnlto this case. A in a i 1 n h. .1-. as in M. ( .e.han s. t'-. an- farmer aud live four or live miles fiom Mr. Voder. Head the an ..nuts in the newspapers of the .'."'. i e .,;.. hearing Challellge.1 by defense. prank irang--r. Ha.e read ao.mt this - r. a-l- nt -i the l-mru. rra.l.-:i i ic Nil..! '.:c.it tin- j.-r:-at SU.....S.1 u.tr:l w.-.s m f.v ri :L-'.n ..f the eo:i.Ii. t o; a- nil !v to the board it r. i;ar.l-.i as an .i.;e.-r oi.sn..i, the t. in" -.1 t i -rciiiiio- (. tin- h. ant had ivn n- i n ;u. Ct nsiin-. I n . r this conditio:, of :h il ...n thought 4he liar i thn.-. He did n.-t pn.jK.-1 the nv iti.m i.r pn-rl -iti uiU cool.! In- tni-t-1 mtli th. i i ina-jcru'Tit. Ucf'irtiicr st tli. aight it nrv .nprot-r a mi l-.- slimild l.ikd the '-n I r,:!f s m it. biiMiu sVio,i t i r 3 from what it said had partially made up his mind but thought he could go into the box and decide the case according to Challenged by the de- nocence of the prisoners. Head tiie IIkk j ai li. Hcceived no letters in regsrd to the case and am not related to Mr. nder or j I". M. Miller. Challenged by defense. Pred. I". "Walker. Have reail and j heard about the case but have not made ' on or exiiresscd nil opinion in regard to the guilt or innocence of the prisoners. Challenged bv the defense. mind as to the cunt or innocence Challenged by defense. . ,1 .v, and to i at n. -r man nt lllade in lerouie Pickev. Have read and heard ,.as .ul p some extent, have formed an a good bit in regard tot his cas-,i!nd have I opinion. Pioth'y. The Coin! g ue the boys some sound ad- v i.-e in m; ir.l to stealing rauroad rid. s ; And now lo w it the day of May, A. told them to trv an 1 g. t holiest w.j-k i ). l.sS.I. The above named defendants Made up my mind as to tin- guilt or in nocence of the prisoners, but notwith standing this could go into t he jury box aii. 1 decide the ease according to the evi dence. Challenged by the defense. oi:iu:i: op Tin-: mi i;r. j ,. ( hauila rlain called, but did not an- The application to change venue is re- i ,t.r fused ; the Court is tmi satisfied from ! Wilson 1 law n. 1 1 ear-1 and rf-adaliont anything apiH-aring that undue excite- . t. ,..lse, but have not formed or ex press men! exists against the prisoners andjt., an opinion, law about three inih-s that no fairtiial can be had in the county, j from Mr. Voder's. There was a good deal 2s May, ISS'.I. Pi:i:Ci i:hm. j,,f excitement in our neighlirhiM.d about the matter. Challenged by the de fense. W. II. Walter Live at Centr.-vilie: No. Mav T., 1 h.ive rea l about the case and heard a ISSO I i T .... . . . ... .. .,,1 ,1,,..! ... .....I , rinn ,.r :i v'er.llct 111 :i ... I s- "-- - it i in- oete us. accordance w ith tin- evidence ; am not j related to .. h-r. A.-c-pted. Tiiink I caul I render an i:n- standi Chal- partial verdict, n-.tAii lenged by defense. John H. Turner II iveu't in i Ic or ex pre tiioti::.'- are uiclinc-l to at t -ai.n a.-cuiiiu! it. d ta.'i uiH.u the siori.'. and slateii ho;l.l-l. A rr..l..ic-:.l ..af.-reii.-e. There v.u a pro! -ngc-l i.mler.-i.ce in th- alt- moon l-t.s.n May-r Cr-gi.-r. j "slate's Alturiiey liiti'ttwi.-r. t '.i-s.r;i- i iioii ouiis.-l 1 hit' h;n-on and Altorn-vs laiih.-r. I.ilhn. Mills and W. .1. Hvn.--. the two latter r-pn-eiiliiig tii - lra-nds-and adherent ; i.l the iiiur.i-rcd man.; I'll.- r.'t'iit was eirciii ited and e..m.ralv . I I :ic asse-ni.ly a.l-.pt. -l : tic- jllda i:d r.l.lliiiT 111 I ca t Kev. H II. '.t. i ' iiurn-'.-r t-. the rr. si.. -re of j ; In.. att--r lie had !'( 'In.pjusl ; l.ni.ii'e pre-byt rv. The r j h.. U the a-, t.o i of I I I'l'.ti.c, J terv and ps ouiui.-nc- tii.H tl. ' ! r. Icrr -1 lu !; 1 1 hat -It -' s. li'. in. i:r. , 'ih- aft.-rn.Mni sksi,n iv;,. i : -1 1 1 1 1 r entin-lv loth-,- :hs.'i;., j t"::i; lane- .ja.- tien. Set.-r.) j :i..i.s loo!;ing to tin- iu.!iir- h.. or.-hihiuon ini.vi-in. t.i w. t 1 '.us-ii t ic- r ni:i I tiiat t in- a ,:yi; u doi .- i-nv politi. a I fu';. j hvelc debate th.' foi!o.,l:' i pre. .-nt. -d i.v toe coniimi: -. c ! an- .-, w as clopt'-d: Kf.s iive.1, ll-a. we ian t.l. i the -I. overall. .!T v- ' i ' lult lie' sun ol I' llil'-. ::i, ' '-. our warm sanw- t m.,isi iv:i.l l ol.uiar mV--,x pri-r--s in favor of iht I pi s,ii-n of tiie trathe il ; li.piors as a ls-.er.ige. a j IU-l'ill!'! proper in. tli.elst I ivii ,i harty ;.l-spHsl. . prole.sl au llllsl llie Ci'imu wa-. a l.-pttsl. A i live H.. sel -ct.sl to confer mitt c tr:i! the Cone r,-4a'i : en the ie:iip-rali'e .pl.-stn, i i 1 1 1 T .ai clinch s-htie r.-v r--i. :i-e to all ..v. ltUle lr 1 iressed an opinion as to the guiit or in- j believed thai the p arl.eipants w.-re i-n- j (.-rv of tn-ln.it asking fori I :.H-en.i- of tl -fendants. Accepted -;''. a. csam.natiou of the pars : , ,,,,,;!f infants tie- .1 I , .. , , , I ami affidavit-, wh'-li had lcn collected ; (,-,.. , that li was in. x f I in-l alhrmed theas iimtli jur..r. j (iV , ,.,., ., , . .rcu to-ail-.-. , I ; .,., ,., ,,.!,V p, .jik John ti. P.-ver. Have heard and read i nii-anor..t.i i;.ti- n of l.i-i N.i-l .a I I mi -I-. ,,r,:.,- , ,- that siii.i.-.t :.-.: Met in a.l.otion ll was sale arrests ..f .. pas-rs i . re iiniiiiii.-.:- llled When llie colli'' end. t in- -tate's attorn t.ll.-d that , ho nanied in t All t,,is was . vuee ca ne to l niakiin: th- ei Cotinsel for the defense then filed th. following motion, asking that (he pris oners lie tried separately : I oninion.-:iilh of Pa.. vs. : fss-.i, n. ,. i. C. .1. Lew is and others ! Iluiglarv. 7". II. l:.,,.lU.; III. ... ..I",'..- .rf eh .' (ii, r ii.i 7V, (.. .V..M-IK. r. Joseph ( . I lot.inan. I 'pin ' that ei.nl.l not l-e sliaki-n. and discharged litem. Adjourned to lt l t p. in. AITKI'VMN Si's-:o. Judges charge in P. -nford c.ise: The in licttii -n! c intains live counts. The a. t of lss7.PV.li sis-tion. provides that druggists are not p-.piin-d to procure li-.'iises, but shall not s.-il li-pior except for medieinil or nieclriiiic.il purp-ises, j an 1 that it pii iil only be sold for inedi-) cine on a physvi iti s pr.-sctip'ion and n it in ire than on s- on the sani" pre-' s-riptiou. If he s d.l only on such pre-' K.-ription he could not be convicted. If h" sold w hiskey w ith medicine, and a il l as nic licine, he c ald not be convicted. Second count was thr 111 out. ill. Sell ing t mm visibly etfjetel by li -pun ll' th-re was any evidence of .-ich sales he coul I hi convicted. -Ph. S.dling on Sunday: You must determine from all the evident, oth cunt : Prosecuted as adr.iggisl. Thrown out. The defendant is entitled to the bene fit of a reasonable doubt. As to the question of cuts, if y.'l ac piit the de fendant tle-n you must decide w in shall pay the cist, the c aunty or the defend ant. A trie, bill having b.-.-n fm:i! against James M. P. iver fir 1'. A. P., on informa tion of l.i.ie Ix -.in -l. he plead guilty ami was sentence 1 to piy a lineof $2".M, costs of prosecution, sio for lying in e.x peusei, and 7o p..-r .pl.irter fir a ii.-riod of three years; and be required to enter into approve 1 b m Is. P nh these partie hail from Southampton to ns'aip. John I'r.-a-c- i: - id the formed ' P'HsbiiPgh 7V..i. -: have not ; i-xp.n-ssi-d ail npiu,-.;u. A-. rea.laliabont ,,.. lome-l as the tcth jur..r. ase. but votild go into the iiitv box and: t i. W. lousii.l i .-1 lave accordance with tin: evidence. Accepted. Jonathan Snvder. Stood aside bv the ' case in our i: in. a good deal aim.it this case, but have not form. si any piriiciihiropinioii. I guess I niiild render an itnp.utial verdict, t hal- l,.lrci! bv the defense. f i 'i. . ... ii. i i .i;-r.. ..... i ..... ' i.hatie de. l-u-al i-.ii ih.it Hie onlv .1 . a . i ,. i. it. to .. .i i ..in ... ... .. . , ! ..i the conference a- t" -ti" o-. i.ie'i .. counts in ldl -rent piper..,l..i! tn.m he . .,,,. . ;1r..., v ui.,-,,and aili.la" on Id Is- govcrne.i by the evidenci- was taken in m .1 r ihal I here mi . !.t l a at M.-v.-rsdale at tin- time " those genih- ti. Id l-r t'.- nmg of lie-c.p .ti.-r's i , . ... ., ., rv tod. iv. It was .ds.,e,i -n out li. men were in lne lo.knp. ha p.-nged ' ' , ..........r n, , j e: a-. d I. i.l hi .-ii evui.iii I and t 'i d tic Hi;;ti- and' vvontd itiiiier no . :n -iii.i .1 ir.ces tu I the IIIC :e t . III. nle 111. ol -pled and af anii.lv r-r.iv 1.1-1 for. in .- ai ffr'wf ..fth I : Taj i... .1...:. I .l.., 11 I I. 1 1 V i . ii, men tiiiuiiir,, .Fi'.iij .i.'i . . . . I ... , . , ,, render a verdict in 1 1 . IlollK-rt, come, ami eacii i..r liiin-eii. : pray the Court that he may be severed : from the other defendants named, and that a separate trial may lie awarded for the following reasons: 1st. The defense of the defendant's re siectively, rests upon different grounds, to be made out by dilf.-rent witnesses and no one of them can be tried joint ly w IIP anoint' r or w un me resi i.iioio walking great damage ami injury to him s i joined. 2nd. Every man is presumed inno cent until he is proved guilty, and to In- nnv (ml. nf v.llir lietitione.s iointlv ' . - - j with another, or Vith the other l.-lts. ; will l. ta strengthen in th? eye of the : .t. . . . . f .1... . . ...I.l. .,,i : I in, l u tas: Ul lliri Hiiiii Hiniiuiii, ri.i.. , , . . . .. , . , , c .rdance with the evidence 111 u nil n l: i ' e ....in... .... . , , , , . , , , , bv defense, force of the dufensa of any defendant s-i ', . , . ., , , , , . j .mini .snaiie. i ..-1 a K"un oe.o ut. ...... I the case, but have not made up my uiind ! as to the guilt or innocence of the parlies. case, hut have I hen is a go-' sec eepted. Jeremiah Henry Praucis Mav. I fa id alnni! tin not m-ide up an opinion 1 bit of tali; in regard to Ih. iotl ft ihf colllllv. AC- Coiumoiiwealtl Moses Parroti. Have r.-ad a g.Kid thai Jeremiah lleiirv. - 1 1 card about this cast; hut could go into the Is.x j the case. Min i aside by the Com n- and render a verdict in aectir.lance with i wealth. Iheevidenivinthecasc. Accepted. I.. P. Sine. Have not made up . r i - Ilenry W. Saylor.-Have read and , . . . r heard very much aU.ut this c:ise. Chal-! ,, ...f,.,lants : have lived in .-hade lenged by the defense. i township for aliotlt I I years ; am in t le- liphraim l. MiUer.-llave heard and j h,,H.r bn;iin,. ( haflenge l by the .le read all alxnit the case but could render j f(,lls). a verdict according to tiie evidence The .slat- 1 i 'leniti vt ' j . r. t trial . 'il.iel .r;i-. ire-, nt..! l-y auialioli. I a.lec.lo:.. v. h te 1 -. I:i rs IPs il. ; ho IV. ls-lll :l I -iing the- fa 'f i I .Miutilin ami' io elail'i a -lit.!;. v. a card I. el. that I'r. ; l.-arlt oi a t!:e 1 'I in-Vi-. in.ii i- ii -ihy 1 laat ir- l.i'loii ..I' 11,11 to !m- in this ell V of ll- IMtional the pill. lie elnpha- i related to Mr. Miller. Not accepted. John 1'islier. Have riot read a great .leal alsiut the case : have heard a little about it. Could render a verdict in ac- Ctiallcnged joined. Ilrd. The Comm "in wealth nristm ike out her case lieyond a reasonable doubt, and a joint trial of any one defendant with another, or vilh tha others, will strengthen the hands of the Common wealth tiKin whom is placed the burden of proof, and who, in a rase of such g:avity as this, fraught with such im-i' pittance to the defendant should l-e I I able to make out a case of guilt without the aid of a faction strength lent her by a joinder of defendant or any of them. 4th. There are miny witnesses testi fying to a contrariety of ciieuiiKtances ; these on In-half of one dcf.-n-l.int those in favor of another. In caj of a joinder of one defendant ith aniiln-r, or with hurt the for severance, and would ever pray &; C. J. Iewis, J. P. S.ilUvan, M irshall Sullivan, his IVcatnr X Tasker, mark (Ir.int I lean. his Jerryinanus X Tiiomas, inaik Clarence P. Anderson, Win. Hill P.eniamin Plough. Have read a lift about the case but hav mind as to the guilt or innocence of the prisoners.. Accepted and sworn as the twelfth juror. Tun -it uv as fin illy selected consist, s of Wm. II. Walter, Pram-is May, M.ws P.arron. Henry C. Shatfer, John (.eisel. .1. J. Shaffer, J. F. K nit., C. W. Weigie, John ll. Turner, John V reuse. leo. Vi". Ilaush. jr., and P. -njauiin Plough. Tin-p' were forty three juror failed aud ex;i:nini d siilliiaii l'..rnin ly rr-Te.l, Mav ".'-. I .iniel '...i'!ilifi. . a. i 1 P. ' ). Sullivan, the .1. al-r. vv.-re forma"-, ar- eht on ;ii. -charge of ninrdcr .iiin. Aiierthc ('-.rniai read wairarits ( ouhlui was led from his ci II in th - llanin sii.s t sta ti'.unrd. accouipanied by his a'torncv. V. S. Korr.-t. was t;ik- n to the i hit a-o ;m iiue :licc station, where, alt r brief nr.s-erdin -s. he was eoniaiitted t-i the ! C:iI.Ai.i.. i the .let.-, -'iv. i ;:kevietv i : r-s! -d to-.ii, ; ing I ir. ' i -i ing -f th- This l-.leliill-j .r..ii.a Af the ev.-nimr ssi.,n ,,( : t-ri.ui general nssemblv ti " -ai I that in view of tin- I 7 had II. .t ll'l ierstoeil the I- rr- 'ia. 1.1- .-uifv-. -- ...... : oiieiiou in tn ! th" .1 'I. lotloil '.-4i tes..i-.ed J'. . re. 'HS'llH!' V . . : . t t t .'H.'rf-rriti'ti.s i i - ttVT-t I.' i- r-4 t i ,m;.l ld . ii.i. :n- I t r l f TV nf t .,ir i , .r. 'ml itinj i'tir. iv .; i I'llIM l .:u:XHk Ui' fcllet'iilli !l! I M t 'l-.lt!. l.i'ri -ni.td'Ki. M ;if fry l"tt r l-.'ii ii'i1" I. "i Lis riihittiri w ) , l.V U l-jsl I : l.iini4' thru it- ,i.-vs1j-.;t- yc. in-' a-t'iiiMv t an riwi'-r : l'i:iili!l.!i M.Iitiat n'v li r A Uu l V ritlllK i'f-i!lH t'p liail. intt-nna-v.mi -rant - f ir tin- ;n -aii ! Nitilivan wi-it' i.iui'itT ! in m. Su'hxaii was ;ii Ti aiti-r fating in sn.N-r at !ii.r:it' an I !n-M a t.mhi r m lskt.- vitu. not made up nty ii'n um-ii v. hi. !i t!n i srorn t i l l.ro;h. r of r .1 ,., ..,..; -'...Hr.. ..iil .. others, great harm, injury, down for trial nest week. ' ' ! nJ I'n lu'e ",,Ht b ,r',3!,t . . defendant.. They tlicref ire pny j ne t ouri ii.sKC'i me i 'isirici. .iiioruey-what'tai-e he elected to try next, .and j that officer asked to have the case of Coinnionueallii vs. Lew is c t. al., taken up. The Sin lilf was untitled and prompt- i ly brought into Court Chailes J. I-eis, Jackson P. Sullivan, Marshall Sullivan. P.sralur Tasker, tiraut I'ean, Win. Hill. Jerryinanus Thomas, Clarence Andrews The prisoner were shaved, washed, tlecently dressed, and presented a passably respectable apiieiiram-c, with out the least evidence of embarrassment. notwithstanding they were the focus t, i Sworn and snlcriUs ls-fore me this partial somar.y liundr,sls.,feu-s. . the r.r.l, day of May, A. !., 1-sstf. Mr. lioition otijecte.l to this rj. is-mg l). J. llocNias, ta'ien opat th:s time on a. cunt of the I Stood aside by the Commonwcaltti. Win. Ferner. Have re-ad and heard all about the case; could form a judgment on the evidence. Cmilleni'cd bv defense. Cyrus W. Pile.-I lave read about the the twelve to fry the case wt-ic ase but have not made up my iiiimi asjagree i nism. to the guilt or innocence of the laities. The ease was opt r.- n by 1. .1. he.os.o- .(.'halieliged by defense. I who s.u.1 the ( omiiioiiwalth would a-k j Johu Marlct-ny. Have read a g.ssl bit uiiii untloiibted evidence a victi-m ! about this c;ls; and luue talked a good uf the prisoner for ot f tiie mo-t brutal ideal aUiUt it, hut have not particularly j robberies ever jn-rpf-t rated w.thin lie ! made up my mind. I don't tiunk I could ' bounds of Wt stern p.-nnsv Ivanin. The ' .... into 'lie iurv Ih.x and render an im- cruel assault no m Mr. Y-i h-r an 1 up-in : partial vt-rdicl. Challenged for cause. Jeremiah J. I.iveiignod. Have heard a ' good ileal of talk almtit this cose, but not- M r- .luiia Want flow r.i-T"N. M"l.v "Js. Mi' IloUe r.seivel 1-l.ltlV I and cvid.-iic. ..I est ni II. .it.ir-.!. J.ilii Ward cigiat'llations on the Tilth . ithsfainliu this I think I could go into his aged w ife and ni-m th-' young lady, a member of I he family, were portrayed. He pointed out I."w is, T:ts'er and th" Sullivan's as the criminals who would the jury box mid render an impartial i lie clearly i lctitiii -d. II' sil l t n-y verdict accortling to the evidence. No j would prove that I.-wis and Ta-ki-i to .k one has written nie or visited me in n gard to this cause since I have been sum li.imiver-i.ry of lu-r birth. II h..u-e ': n ,-.s M'.i rwliehiie i with Moral gif'i.s, nud , manv friend- t :;'! I in r-. n. while: j many others s,-nt J.-ft.-rs and l.-i-gnims. I ' motig t'i- l..it-r wer- . V.'. 1 1. .iin-, ; i(.. W. I "mils. !:. W. (iilder and V. V. !.s...rv. Ar.s.ption t;t, hell la ieven- inii.t'i win. Imiit -li.ii:ii'T..f friemls j ; m, iv icMt -d. Mrs. Howe's a-.- pr.-clud-', in ; a lar a-r i ntertaiuiiictit. j ! . Il.-etiiitf i.r tli- I'ilerilii .:-I.-Iv. I I'l.YW'.fTH. Mass.. .M iv ".'si. At the ' nmiiiid mi eting of th- I'd.rini s.i"tv v.-si -r lav Joiin l. Li'iig was i h,.-. u I president: llcnrv siiekriey of l.a:tiin..e. I S':lii:;m Kialt.-. r li den. k U Am-s ilnd : 11. M. I'- xtcr. vice pn-sideiiLs; V. s. j 1 i.l iloi th of Plymouth, secretary, and Isaac N. Stoddard of i'lvniouth. tr.-as-I i:icr. frmiitf Walki j . Vv'a-i;im,tis. May . walking match f..r o a-K.-rn.tn s ttieatre at i:.-.n Twelve women start' I. I g.sid at f.-n-lai. e ttirou.-:i tit i-i. ning. The tir-f da- s ciud.sl i.t midaight t ti. I -t... a., follow , .ti.-.- t r--': to tie- i.nl.o: f'vans "... Totalis An.. -i.f I'l.oal. I'riiit-es- Ai.ekis'l, fieeiei.; .1- ;--;. .". :': K J i i.e r, .... 11. l.l.-.s.,a ' t . I.ain.ir llmlf-rs H..riirr M Pint.uu l.l-iil v. Mac .- s,-il--rt tVIt! llllrt tr'Si;,l.i. e-.-. . he.. Uses.. TK-!1 li ef i.ie l'ro-.eet ftr.-wui r this city. w in. h wits r?t:w honor liei-use. the I -.i-rc; in. .ruing unii.t'-d :t w i I T ; iiiaii.htuiii. reipuriiig t ! fieei's.' court to show ! r. fit al. T'ie writ is m . I ::;rii-i.i:rg on V.'.-.h j N.t!.ing w-;i.s done alio i iis . Th" M.ints subi i of the Philadelphia li j wer.- identic d w ith t' 1 the U.ttlerV e.'v-a from Challenged bv the ile- uiotit-d as a juror. fc use. tieorge Cramer Have heard consider- aid-- als.ut this c-.ise, but don't know that j ence they were in poss... 1 have expressed ail opinion. Stood ' articles taken from Mr. 'aside bv Commonwealth. supier at Voder's a few tiav before to a-iptaint themse! v-s with the house. Will prove when they cam-- to the coun ty, and when and where tlu-y h !, a'so will prove vili-n arr'sled in-ir C. t.tlu :oi various Voder. When A !' (l.V. Merri rcit ! U lilf: 1S--o I 1 1 i arrested iu Faytte county t'c- ere J. II. lowry P-.'a.I what was publish- associated with tue other pris-mers m.w ( ed in Meyers.lale ( :,::i,.,.r.-hil and have before the curt un let indictment, heard some talk about this case. Could! Counsel for the defense aski d thrt tin go into the jury box and render an iui-jjury Is. not allo-ved t- s.-parate and olac- rdit t. Shsid aside by the Com- j ers Tinsidore I-Ciumi'-I and W. P. Huston j monwealth. wen- ordered to lake charge of the n nn- I Henrv C. Shaffer. I have heard alxnit . til S i'.tl o'clock Wednes-lav nioruiiig.nl I'rothoimtarv. jthia case, but have tint niaue up or ex-1 which time court will meet. lasli-r short III Mis .t-ri.aiits. roiiTPiiij.tii f tjji.' ,-, t-i... N. V.. May ."-. In-s-t.ir i V hin.t.in. Mav i' :.. it It-, has U.s-n makin ': an eiiui- J ti..;i ol th.- New cliui . -n of tiie ais-o-intof f '-.-fmaster ' g. n.-ral ch-in h i-f P'- ala-r i f t he v ill 115- of f uhon, ( is-i had en ;..med iiev. Lni c-.iiufv. hii.ilisioiereil a sliortitge ; pr -a. lung w itmn its ji. oo. I ). nut , I'tistina -t.-r Moit ui has iipm the t.d )-. A res plai e I ill charge of r'leotiice. 1 1 I io illdi il sin-lie pi-, ,s , J is iu..erst.si. f li-.r Hie sooi tae it is i.i ii ; i ::n ties -ioe, al si ti, ma-!.- g.si. l.v Wiiitiaker's t-n.I-nen. ; -tit'iti"n .ii a -r:u tr 1 - j I i nice. Iii tli- after . ' T,i llni ll lla.tr. ! . o.il, reili was held j j V. V.ao.- .v 'S In 1),,. T'ifiot, : -t I. . I...II 1. .1 I 5 in iilest I'r. I,', in. rt -f n. the m'nif readers ; re-ui. ir p!" stetaii. testitj.si that he bad ' fil'-ii s.n'ii I'.i-hop in cat.dev. hen he i me.t ... ad. Wilacv, would not hae ; js i f. i lii.-d aii aiiiopsv so h -stdv is it iv.n ::... .1 w.ih . I tion -. Th" hearing w ill pr-s c-1. i ( rrr t w . t hu v 1 ! K .rant v:t;.l -il-I'lislm Pe. J". : .-r ; ,),'!"-1 "" J, i ra-l C l. sul.stau:ial I'.s'ime- to lj, I ' ,v"'l! I i j land 15 ctnu. Jin. A. K. I'hu I a " J!l1 1 ' 1 at the liatolial en pit 111 I he evening a s.l i.t the Hamilton h i
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers