31-linmf ottrual. Saturday Morning, Oct. 2. B. BANNAN, Editor and .Proprietor C. LITTLE, Associate Editor. ' Foe PREgItIENT .GENERAL *WINFIELD SCOTT, Of New Jersey. FOR Vlit rnEmPENT WILLIAM A. GRAHAM, Of North CoroHMI. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS, FOR TOE STATE AT LARGE Jamcs Por-cocu AirX &ND rit E. 13RowN • DISTRICT ELECTORS. Distrrrtg. -I I. pis-fru/A,. I. Wsz,l7lll.7Gur. int N. MIDDLESWAITII, 2. JILMI:3 Tr.A.gv tn. . 14..1. 11. (414PRE1.L. 3011 Y W STOKEs, I IS. JANE! D. PLITON, 11 4. 304 P. VErnier.,• 1:i. J, K. DAVIDISON, 5. S. Mc 11TATME. 1.17. 14,1. Ylitel'I.LUCH, G. J. W. FVI.LFR. I IS. RALPH Mum,. 7. JamLs PE.san,r.. • - 1 19. Joun.4 (ANTOS 8. JOHN :111.17FFE12. 20 A. llorTinsom 9. .I.tedlllll.kagrixi.e., 1 21. T.J. tlinuiv. 10. C. P. Wni.t.En, 22. I.ewt3 R. 1.0R1). 11. DAVIS ALTGN. 1 22. cliniTr. MET EAR. It MAHLON (1. ,t ":111:11C1.11, 1 21. DORMAN PLIF.I.PS, • FOIL JUDGE nF THE !II'PREVE MILT, JOSEPH 'BUFFINGTON, Of Armstrong. County JOB CANAL C.III , IIF , GIONEII. JACOB ROTTMAN, Of Berks County JOE lIENDRICES,j Esq., of Tnninqun Gen. JOLIN E. CLEMENT, of Aliner,ville lion. JACOB nerruara, of orwiz.bor,.. County Commi•srovrr, ISAAC sTniucu, of North Maitheitn nirertor of tile Poor, DANIEL M. REBER, a South Nllinheiin 301:1N A. OTTO, of Barry Township.. Indtpetarnt candidate for :Sheriff, • : ,4 Col- JAMES NAGLE, of •"-• Styr. AT. :Icicles we were 'anxious ti:L publish thi. week have been unavoidably crowded out—our colum'ns speak fir. them-. selves. Among the deterred communications is a lengthy and well-written one by a Whig, in favor of Col. Karns, the independent Con gressional candidate. CONTEMPT OF CO.UII,T •We present our readers with a repor of the recent proceedings in our Court ag,ams JOHN C. NEVILLE, Esq., a practising mem her of the Bar. who was stricken from the rolls by the, Judge for an alleged contempt of Court. The ease is certainly an extraor idinary one and has, we learn.no precedent on record. We cannot conceive- how a,Court can be insulted or treated with contempt by the presentment of a respectful Affidavit, shoWing cause why a Judge ought not to try a case, and containing reasons, which, it true, wisuld be sufficient to debar ta person front giving evidence in the case, or a juror . from lteing-empanneled to try it. We had intended laying the whale case fairly beffir'e the' public, fOr their decision, without and' cotntnent of our own—but it has assumed' a different aspect. We are . prohibited - 1 rom publishing that portion which is in justification of Mr. Nr.vtu.r:'s conduct, under the. threat of a prosecution—and he staff beiltre the community by the official fiat of one maw—his family deprived of their. support, and he, himself a cripple, deprived of hiS occupation. He is left without redress: and the public is deprived of the means of judging whether be has committed an offence or tint, While all the acts of the Court-are fully laid beffire the people. We are aware what is due to the dignity id' a - Court—and it Jud,ges,are of good repute and act honestly . and uprightly in the admin istration of justice, the community will al ways sustain them, and there never will be insults or contempt tiflered to such a Court : hut if, un the other hand, justice is adminis tered loosely ; cases put off ult triHim! pre text, wilco sonic otli ors neglect their duty, and others desire relaxation, driving men to self-destruction : when proceedings are so extrajudicial that the intentions .of the Court are communicated and known before they.are protnulga tt:d by the Bench— when Grand jury alter Grand Jury represent the tippling houses as the cause of the great in• crease Of crime in the county, and the Court, in defiance of law and tegti Any degalize the. most notorious establishment; m the ilegiou granting them licenses—such Courts must expert to have their-dignity called into question by the . people, and they may he placed in - unplew-ant situation: lieli - tre the public. -After the ahoy: was written we received the followinr communication from one of our mos t r o vc,-fable citizen', which seems to corroborate the views„.„ we have 'taken above : .1011 N C. NV:VILLE. ESQ.. Mr. Encron :—The dismissal of tne above mon ...1 eentleman from the Bar. I.y•hn Order of the I'c having Iceortie the subject of comment in the piddle p.iper it is but lust that the ground, of his dismissal should be understood I.y the enninni city. For tins purpose the suleeriber 'WWI about taking hi- pen. when it wit" intimated to him, that Judge 11-gins had -given notice that he would pun ish any One by - whir - A- in-trumernatity the Affidavit, the presentation of which constituted Mr. Neville's offence, -hould be made public.. Stich a • threat, if - side were really made, exhibits a disposition to prevent Mr Nevtiltt from making any attempt nt ins owit justification. 'To justify him-elf from any charge. alleetitig his character or reputation, is the right oft:very citizen, even of the humblest. Nei ther Court nor Judge has any right to prevent him from domg so.'; and for either to attempt it. is an unwarrantable viofation Of the right, of the citizen. In Mr. Neville's en-c, the prrvetal inn of Affidavit eon-Muted hi. offence. „The offence, 'h o w e ver, enn-isted in the contents of the Affidavit and not in its presentation. In order to mnderstand 'the - character of the Offence, or whether there *IV , :my-offence at ail. the pubbe rou st h e i n f orme d o f the contents of the Atlionvit. This. hotVever, the Judge declares they shall not' be, except at the ex pense of the punishMent of hint who , hall dare to make them public. This is harsh justice. The Judge eliaracterizi. the Affidavit as `• nefarious, - as cent:lining eliarzeisagainst him of •‘ gross eorrup t ion. and want of integrity:" and this he does upon the Bench. Mr. Neville deities, that the Affidavit contains nay such charges as those alleged by the Judge; and hem he and the Court are at issue.--, The pnblication of the Affidavit would show which of the two is right. Bin the Judge refuses perm's • Sion to publish it, and threatens those Who do it with punishment! A , tar as we .can see, Mr. Neville's case is a Lad one. The Court has stricken him front the list of Attorneys . for presenting an Affidavit, containing charge.• of `•gro, corruption and want of integii . ty• against the President Judge—so says the latter. Mr. Neville sates the Affidavittaifitruned no charge of the kind. There is a ini-lake somewhere ; and all will agree that it ought to be corrected. It is rather too mulch that a man should be deprived of his means of livelihood through a mistake; and if tune Out, when the Affidavit is published, (it the press should ever be unmuzzliedd that it con tainn no chinze of "corruption or want of integri ty'' against Judge Hegins, the public will be apt to conclude that he acted hastily, at least. When the rase of Mr. Neville came on to be heard before , the Court, his Counsel, M. Cooper - , applied to bare the objectionable matter set out in the Rule, in order that the respondent might know with certainty to what he had to answer. This Judge Ilea ins peremptorily refused--Jeciariug that the Affidavit should never under any circumstances ap• pear Upon the Rem-J. This, it seems to us, is :.bordering on ink/Alec. -. The verie-t criminal has right to be informed of therharges pieferred against.'! him; but this right. founded on the simplest jmnice, has been denied Mri Neville, and he has been stricken from the list of Attorneys, amidepriveil of his means of support - npon charges which are total ly unfounded; for we are assured that the Affidavit, -; the presentation of which was the ground of his (licence contains-no "nefarious" charge, nor any imputatida whatever of " corruption or want of in tegrity" on the part of the Judge, as was alleged by the hater on the Bench. tl:7'-Tle Maine Low has been introduced into the Canadian Parliament. SAMUEL C. Puerwicr, Sn~ale, A. trnif, 21, Auditor COIDIT PROCEEDINGS. I IMPORTED FOR. TUE -AMU . SOrEXAL.I SouC. NEVILLE, Esq.—Rule entered - by the Court upon Jowl C. NEVILLE, Ef.q., to show cause why he should not be-stricken from the roll of Attorneys for contempt. - The following circumstances will show the ground of the Rule entered by the Court. some tima-since, certain (acts mere suggested by Michael Murphy, a citizen of Pottsville, as the foundation Of a inocceding in the nature of a Quo IVarranto against the ‘f Farmers' Bank of Schuylkill County.- for the purpose of avoiding its charter. .ToxiX C. NEVILLE, with whom were associated L. Bancroft, B. Bartholomew, Thomas H. Walker and Howell c 4 ed Fisher, Esquires, was the Con sel of the relate: l Michael Murphy, in. the pr ing against the Bank. At n late term of the C urt;the petition or' bill of the relator Wa -4 presented, and a partial ar gument had. ;At the time of the argument, the Court intimated an opinion; founded on the case of the Commonwealth vs. Barrell 7 Barr, adverse to the right of a private relator to prosecute for a Quo 7lTrorronto; but. no decision was made, the. came 1 dieing, held over for further examination. i' After the adjournment of the Court, the Counsel or the relator having ascertained that the ease theCommontnalth vs. Barrel!, had been miscon ceived by the Court, asked for a further hearing, which the Court acceded to. In the meantime the relator, Murphy, having learned that the business relations between Judge Ifegins, the President of the Court, and the Bank were of such a character, taken in connection with certain declarations made by the Judge, as to Warrant the conelusio7f a. Liar legal on his part, in favor of the flank yril against :Murphy, the latter made an affidavit, set tin- forth facts, which his Counsel deemed sufficient to ohs' the Judge of jurisdiction in the case. • [The Affidavit we have not inserted, because we were notified that' it. had been, stricken from the Records of the Court, and it we published it. ive would be prosecuted for so doing. We however, givd the substance of it, so as to complete the Re port of the case and render it intelligible. It was couched in respectful language, and alleged that the Judge was employed as Counsel in the case. by the Bank before he was elected to the Bench— that he would be called upon as a witness in the case ; and also, from remarks made both on and off the Bench, that it was believed that he was pre jadiced against the Plaintiff. For these reasons, the Affidavit respectfully asked the Judge to with draw from the Bench in the trial of this ease.— Editor Journal.] On the Sth of September, the Affidavit or Michael Murphy was presented to the Court ,by Mr. Nev ille, in his capacity as Counsel of Murphy-, and or dered to be filed. In the propriety of the presenta tion of the Affidavit in question. Messrs. Baneroft, Walker and Fisher concurred. At the time it was presented, the Affidavit was read by the Judge,- but no exception taken to it ; nor Was it known-until the Monday following, five days afterwards, that it had grown into a contempt in the estimation of Judge Ilegins. On this last mentioned day, he di rected a Rule to be entered, requiring Mr. Neville to show cause, why he should not be stricken from the roll of Attornies fora contempt, committed in presenting the Affidatit. V ' On the entry of this Rule, Mr. Neville consulted Messrs. Cooper and .11ughes, and employed them to 'appear for him in answer to the Rule. The hearing, of the Rule was fixed for Saint day the ISth day of 'September ; but was cordinned from time In time until Monday' the '27th, when it came on to be heard. • , Mr. Cooper,' as Counsel for Mr. Seville, respon. ded to the Mile. He stated the law in relation to 1 , contempt, admitting thti right of the Court to pro- tect its authority and dignity by „summary punish ment, when either was wilfully and palpably inva ded. He contended, however, that it ,was a right . which should be exercised with caution. and only In eases where the contempt was manifest and pre meditated. An inadvertency or mere mistake of judgment on the part of an Attorney should never be visited by so severe a punishment, as is involved -in the deprivation of his office, which in this coun try is, in most instances, his only means of support. , Ile denied that there was any necessary contempt of the Court involved in the presentation of the Affidavit in question. The law supposed that bas might exist in 'the mind of a Jude, Without im pugning his integrity. There was no station too high to be above the reach of bias; and the client believing that the businessi connection between the Judge and the Bank, which Wa- , a party to the pro ceeding. taken in connection with certain exprcS sions which it was.alleged the Judge hail let fall was of a character from which leg,tl bias wool be interred. brought the subject to the notice of his I Counsel. The Counsel being of opinion, that the tarts alleged by Murphy were sufficient to deprive the Judge of jurisdiction in the ease, on account of tbe , bias which the law would infor therefrom,-prc pred the Affidavit in question, which Was after wards presented by Murphy,.through the medium of Mr. 'Seville, one of his Counsel. Hut in presen ting the Affidavit, Mr. Neville did not become re sponsible for the' truth of the facts which it con tained. This lie disavowed entirely. llfe. Cooper contended, that whether the Coun sel were right or wrong in the opinion which they entertained of the facts set forth in the affidavit— Nvhether legal bias were inferable, or not inferable from - them, yet if the Counsel believed so. however Joistaken such belief might be, there was no Con temptoin the presentation of it. Whether a contempt IN:1, committed or not. lie argued, depended upon the motive which actuated the Counsel in present ing it. It it were presented in ;Sod faith. in the, discharge of its duty to his client, without malice or ill-will to the your:. there we.. no contempt. In this . case. Mr. Cooper said, that the alleged eon temirit wus vonstructive contempt, depending up on the motive with which it was presented. 'I o' show that it was the motive constituted the con tempt, lie quoted rlfit Case of A v %lie and others— ,r).l-lawle P. 45. He then proceeded to show, that in cases of con tempt of this kind. depending upon the motive. the parts charged with the contempt, might judge him self it, by craning. into Court,- and making oath that no contempt had been . intended. This Bole was founded upon a universal principle. Its spirit was invoked in the -ettlement of controversies in social lite. tine man is grossly insulted by another thro' the expression of disparaging opinions, or offensive epithet,. The injured party ..eks redress. Alust the controversy proceed to bloodshed' or will a w ithdrawal . or explanation of the odimsive language sutfiee ' Undoubtedly it would. A candid- and frank apology is deemed stacient amongst gentle men ; awl the reason it is ,o, is, that respect is paid to the infirmity of huMan nature. Men are all I liable to err ; and if errors were never to par ' cloned, the state of society would be a state Of wnr, of all against all. The 3 Rule is us applicable in Courts as elsewhere. Where an offence was commuted, and a frank upOl ogy made, at ought to be pardoned. Espeeially ought this to be the case where no afence was de signed, as was the cape here. -That no wilful of fence against the Court had been coiwnitteil by Mr. Neville, in the presentation of the Affidavit. he, Mr. Cooper, was prepared to show by hi client's Atli• davit. which he would read to the- Court. The Affidavit was a , follow: J(Ms C. NEVlLi.r.'s' ArriDAVIT In the matter of the 'Rule of John C. Neville, F.sq., to show cause why he should not be stricken front the roll of Attornys for an alleged -contempt of Court.. In the inatteraloresaid, in order to'show shat no contempt of the said Court was in any man ner ilesipied or intended by the said John C. Nev ille in presenting the affidavit of Michael Murphy, setting forth certain facts, for the purpose of show ing such a connection between the Hon. C. W. fle-ins, President Judge of the several Courts of the County of evhitylkill, and the Farmer's Bank of said county, against which a writ of Quo War med° had been applied for, at the instance of the said Michael Murphy, as would deprive the said Judge of jurisdiction in the case, he, the 'said John C. Neville, on his oath duly taken before N. M. Wit-sus, a Justice 'of the Peace in and for the County of Schuylkill, cloth declare, that in the case ot the Quo Warrants) prosecuted on the sugges tion of Michael Murphy against the Farmer's Bank 'of Schuylkill county, the said John C. Neville was and is one a the Attorneys and Counsel oldie said Michael Murphy. duly employed and retained; and that it was in his capacity, as such Attorney and Counsel, :hat he„presented to the Court the Affidavit containing the suggestions and statements, which he understands are the ground of the Rule requiring him to . !Mew cause why he should nett be stricken from the roll as a practicing Attrimey4tUd Conmet of the said Court. And the said John C. Neville milk oath declares that in the presentation of the said Affidavit containing the suggestions and statements therein, he was moved thereto' by no contemintof said Court, or any member thereof; but solely Lt the promptings of what he considered bus duty to his client, at whose instance and request. and not at hisown, the same was presented. And the said John C. Neville on his oath further de clares, that in the presentation of the Affidavit afore-aid. lie did not design to assert the truth of the suggestions and statements therein contained, and that it never enteredhis mind that such presen tation in a i'espectable manner would be regarded by the Court, or any member thereof, as a contempt, or evidence of n want of respect, on his part, for it or any of its members. On the contrary, be, the said John C. Neville, declares on his oath as afore said, that theretofore, as well as at the time of the presentation ot the said Affidavit, he had entertain ed, and did entertain for the said Court, and each and every member thereof, and not only showed re spect; as ought always to exist on the part of member of the bar towards the Court, but likewise sentiments of kindness and strong personal regard entirely inconsistent with any disposition to con temn its authority. And this said John C. Neville on his Oath further declares, that alto said Air i d a rit was neither suggested nor drafted by him alone,but in connection and atter consultation with a majori ty of his colleagues in the case, and to the best of his knowledge and belief, the suggestions and state ment therein contained, were made by Michael Murphy, the relator in the unse of the quo Weirranm heretofore referred to, and drafted and put in form by him the nit! John C. Neville, L. Bancroft and and Thomas H. Walker, Esq'rs., wbo'were also- Mated witb dim and othrs as Attorney - and Coun sel of said Murphy„ n the pross...ution of the Quo Wturanto aforemid. An the said John C. Ne ville furtheidechues, that the propriety of the said Affidavit, containing the suggestions anti statements t h ere i n , was agreed to previously by his colleagues in the car, namely by hinges, Banta% -Weiker THE MINERS' JOURNAL, AND POTTSVILLE GENERAL ADVERTISER. and Fisher; but with thelast a r med he the saidJ. C. Neville did not consult, through want of oppor vanity or otherwise, but understood from his client. the said Michael Murphy, that he had exples . sed his acquiescence , in and approval of the propriety of presenting the Affidavit aforesaid. And the said John C. Neville on his Oath further declares, that the aforesaid Affidavit, which had been drafted by one of his colle-47ues, at the instance, as he,the said John C. Neville, was informed of the relator in the gwo (Parma - to; Michael Murphy, it contained other stwestions than those therein set forth,nt the time of 'the presentation thereof, which he the raid JAC.' Neville deemed irrelevant and unnecessary, alai which, through respect to the Court, he insis ted upon striking out; and in order to chew the re lator, Mr. Murphy, the propriety of striving out the said irrelevant matter, he stated the facts in re lation to the same, to James Cooper, Esq.„, sugges• ting to him, at - the same time, tbe, propriety of pee senting nothing irrelevant and improper. • Mr. Coo per, although not Counsel in the case, concurred with the said J. C. Neville in the propriety of stri king from the Affidavit every thing which might be regarded as impertinent or irrelevant. Accordingly the matter referr,M to was struken out. This state ment by - the respondent, the said J. C. Neville to negative by reference to facts, the prestunption of all dispoSition to contemn the authority of the said Court or any of its members. And in conelu-ion the said respondent repeats,on his oath, that., in neither the preparation or presen. tatioaiof the said Affidavit, did he design or intend to comemn the said Court or any hi its members; contempt of their authority and disrespect for the persons or characters of the Judges, being a thing that never i;ntered his mind, either in the prepara thin or presentation of the same. Sworn and subscri bed before me, this 17th day of E. 4 eptember, 1852. , N. W. WILSON, J. P. The foregoing Affidavit contains the answer °I the respondent, J. C-Neville. to the Rule upon him at the instance of the Court, to show cause why he the said respondent should not be stricken front the rull as a practicing Attorney of the said Court. Filer- Nth September, IS:r2. This ,Affidavit, M(. Cooper said, excultetted Mr. Neville from all intention to commit any contempt against the Court or any member thereof. It was a full and unequivocal denial of nnv design to nu pip the authority or character of the Court in any. respect; and must be. according to the Rule to which he had called the attention of the Court, a sufficient purgation of Mr. Neville. Jilrfgri Ileginx here interrupted Mr. Cooper, slating that while front the former friendly relations existing,, between himself and Mr. Neville, he did not believe that any contempt of the Court was in tended by him. in the presentation of the Affidavit, the Court would not tolerate the continuance upon the record of such an Affidavit, imputing to a-mem ber of the Court gross corruption and want of in trity., That Affidavit must be withdrawn ; and it was Well enough that Counsel should understand this. Mr. Cooper replied that he thought the Court, in summing up the substance of the Affidavit, had done it in terms which tte statements in the A& Alavit did not lolly warrant. It did not charge cor ruption or want of integrity in the Court, nor in any member of it. The Judge, lie said, was mistaken in supposing, so. The Affidavit contained a statement of certain facts. forthe truth of whirl' Mr. Neville had never pretended to vouch ; but none of the facts stated, involved, either directly or indirectly, a charge of corruption or want of integeny. The flirts set forth, with the exception of the last, did not involve, even it they were true, any unproprie tv, let alone corruption or turpitude of conduct on the part of the Judge ; nor . from the last, wan any thing like either, inferable. They were simply facts froni which Mr. Neville and his associated Conn setbelieved the law would raise the presumption of bias. This being the ease, it was the right of the Coun.cl to bring the tirt. to the attention of the Court, provided they ( I nd so aorta fide. without guile or malice. But one word, said Mr. Cooper, as to the with drawal of the A ff idavit 1)y Mr. Neville. In his judgment. and that of his colleague. (Mr. Hughes,) Mr. Neville had no right to withdraw Ito,. This much he would say, that Mr. Neville wrViild be content with its withdrawal, but neither he nor his Counsel believed that he had any right to with- draw it. Jud!..e lkoing—The Court think differently. ./Ife. Cooper rejoined that he thought, if the Court would lend him its attention for a moment, he could prove to its satisffiction, that he had not the power. In. the first. place, Mr. Cooper said that Mr. Neville was but one of five Counsel jolt's. ease, with no more power nor right than any of his as Besides this, the Affidavit was not it was the Affidavit of the cheat ; nod in point id law, the Affidavit was presented by the client.— The Attorney was no more than the representative or agent used by him in its presentation ; and as the client had in expressterms prohibited his Conn scl from - withdrawing the Affidavit, Mr. Neville led no power to do so. .T. , olze Mfg.!: COort is not to be told, that Counsel may insult ; the Court by charging it with corruption and then take shelter Iseliind the client. Mr. Cooper contended that whether there was an insult or contempt 'committed against the Court or not, depended upon the motive. and that Mr. Neville's Affidavit negatived entirely ally motive of the kind. - Joth.o. Ifrp,'ini• again repeats doubt the Counsel could withdi\ pad that it was not enough fir he n;2s wdlinr: it should be withdra\ Court should strike ' MI Mr. Nevil le, the wrong, had the undoubted pow - e, draw it, and should not ask the Court to dolilitttil power in striking off. 4 , Mr. Cooper said if lie rightly understo the Court, it had determined that if Mr.' Neville did of do what neither he nor his Counsel believo the had power to do, the Rule would be made A: sate. Iftien were the case he was not to be stricken fr m the roll of Attorneys fir what Ge had done i he pre sentation of the Affidavit. but fur what it: refried to do, believing. that he had no power to do it. But this could not be. Thb Rule was entered for the purpose of punishing.the respondent for an alleged contempt. committed in the presentation of the Affi davit, and could not be used to punish him for ano ther and different offence, viz :Ilan of refitsmg to do what lie Wievel he hail not the power to do. But before making the Bide absolute. and strik ing the respondent from the list of Attorneys, Mr. Cooper hoped the Court would-pause and consider whether the punishment which was contemplated was not more than cominensurate with the otfenee committed., . In the .eye of the 'law the respondent had purged himself of the contempt on which the Role was hared. 'Where this had been done, pun ishment hail never been inflicted. But here he was to be stricken from the list, and his means of sup port to betaken from lino. An Attorney had a pro perty in his C/11/11/ nits' in most instance's, in this conntry, his office 3ra , his sole means of support, It *as m the case of the respondent, but he claimed no favor nit this account. He stands upon Ilk innoeenee of alt intention of having committed' a contempt, desiriM, , h un, Alr. Cooper, to reiterate as his Counsel had tiled, that in the presentation of the Affidavit, be had acted in good:taith, in obede cnee to he oath of fidelity to Isis client, and witle out evil intention or tualice.towards the Court. fife. Hughes said he would add, but a word to 1 , what his colleague had said, , The subject presen ted itself to his mind in tWo risperts:-1 st. had a party the right to suggest facts front whirls the law would presume lies on the parted the Court? - lie thought a play bud stkh a right, Ind, of course, it was-to be exercised respectfully towards the Conti. The matter of complaint was an alleged contempt committed by his client, Mr. Neville, in preseming an Affidavit sworn to by Michael Murphey. Mr. Neville thought that the matter set forth 'tithe Af fidavit constituted a legal objection to the C.ompe tencv of the Court on amount ol interest. He then eked an instance in which he had suggested anin terest in a case about being tried hy Judge Jordan, on account of his being it stoekilder, in the Date, vine flank, the Bank being a part • to the record. He had no tear at the time, that the possession of such an interest would induenee Judge Jordan im properly. lie hought,on thecontrary,that a knowl edge on his part that he hail such an interest would have had a tendency to induce him to lean the oth er ways Mr. Neville believed this to be a parallel case; he was clearly of thO opinion that the interest of the Court unmanned to a disqualification. In this ewe Mr. lieg/ies said lie knew that Mr. Neville acted muter it,hclief not only that his client had a right to str.,, , ged a disqoalifying interest, but that the filets set forth in Murphy's Affidavit con stitutes' a legal objection to his Ifotior occupying tht• position of President Judge in the trial of the cause. When Mr. Neville spoke to him, to uct as his Counsel, he, Mr. Hughes, hail suggested that the tams did not 'amount to a disqunlification ; tint Mr. Neville was sit confident that they did, lie of fered to produce authorities to prove thecorreeiness of his position: • - Ile fly - night Mr. Neville wrong,,but as a enntempt consisted in the motive. and ns Mr. Neville's mo tives were pure there was no contempt in presen ting the. Affidavit. But let us suppose for the sake of argument that the facts stated in the Affidavit of Mr: Murphy, did not set forth anv cause that of- ', -heated the legal competenev of the Presalent Judg e. What tiscii'P It did not at all follow trom this t hat Mr. Neville had been guilty of it contempt of Court, he believing and so toning upon that belief:Opt the At fidavit did set forth facts legally disimalifying, the President Judge. A mere mistake of opinion, to which all men are liable, can never amount to contempt, which is an act flowing from %criminal motive. It now remain:lib be seen if Mr. Neville I has not made honorable amends to the Court for .presenting that AdidaVit. He has given the 'strong est evidence of his sincerity,that of his denial upon his solemn oath of any intention to impeach the integrity of any member of this Court, and that oath otrzlit besatisfaetory. 1 have advised him to withdraw - the Affidavit. • I have made a labored effort, have weed and insisted upon his client, Mr. Murphy, doing so, but it was in vain. Mr. Ne ville is not of the opinion that he has the legal right to withdraw the - Affidavit, -without the consent of-, is client, Mr. Murphy. If I were in his place I would assume the miter in spite of my client.— Ills Affidavit was unfit to be presente,d and ought to be Withdrawn by the party' having the tight ' do so. Mr. Neville thinks he cannot withdraw it in HOyispofilintraihstdi.hohieniiemrettoteinrnhteetirt:i7a:tiipestimitpilsnoi,lorirnih a s n e d li so ent n ; 1 11 n 1r I ..Co j o u pe av r, h i e ln e g o lle t;rt : . M T r. h i e itig eo be t;t • does not impute to Mr.. Neville a criminal act in , presenting the Affidavit. He declares on oath that be had no intention of contravening the authority , of the Court. So for we are satisfied. Hut it is idle to say that he has made 'proper amends, while the Affidavit remains on record That Affidavit chargers the President of this Conn with nefarious eolith:et—with vonduct which would disgrace him as a man and a Judge. It cannot be tolerated that it should remain on rreord, a perpe ' mid stigma to the Judge and till connected with him Iby the sacred fies'of.relationsliiii. Let the Midas vit be withdrawills-the Court shall insist upon this Muter all cireunasiances and at all hazards. Afr...Ungheß cominued—Mr.fievilledoubted his powerlo withdraw it, and so did his Counsel. He: -Mr. Hughes, was sorry it was presented, he never would have presented it, and - .now, be wopld ray again that were he in Mr. Neville's place,he would assums the right of withdrawing it, whether. lie possessed the power or not.• But this wasno rule for his clierit,nor was this,lietsubmitted rzetful ' lyi what he was called upon to answer rule entered against his client was based on the "presets= tenon of an improper- Affidavit. His offence ma sired in the presentation not in the reheat to with. draw. Thn first is a positive chaip, which be has answered by swearing be deli ped no contempt.— This is the purgation the law requires; this is hon. orable metal% and he could, in his- jatment, be required to do no more. He, Mr. Neville, presen ted the Affidavit at the instance of his client, and his client in the mdst peremptory manner refused bins permission to withdraw. it. Mr. Hughes said be would again repeat that be vonild take the re sponsibility and withdraw the right or wrong, were he in the place of. Mr. Neville ;. brit there was no obligation surely to compel a man to do that which be had not a right to do. Judge Ilegins: It is useless to tell the Court that the Attor ney has not power to withdraw the Affidavit in question. The Attorney has power to withdraw pleas and papers, and we see it exercised every day in Court. Mr. Neville can withdraw this. 211 r. Cooper bqged leave to say a single - wcrd in answer to the last surgestion of the Court. By consent of the Court it was true, he said, the At. tomey had a right to withdraw pleas, and perhaps papers." But 'this was by the implied consent of the client, and by the authority of the Statute. The client might, at any moment, determine the Attor ney's whole authority, and who would say after his authority had been determined that he could do any act of the kind supzes.ted., It was only by vir tue of his warrant of Attorney., express or implied, that the Attorney could withdraw pleas or papers. It was as the agent of the principal in his room and stead, that he acted in a case of the kind refer red to, viz : in the withdrawal of pleas or papers. Here the client had expressly forbidden the Coun sel to withdraw the Affidavit. Having presented it as the agent of the client, it was only as such he could withdraw it. But for this purpose he was no longer the agent of the client. the latter having expressly as he had already stated, forbidden hint to act in the matter. But the Affidavit is a record. It was filed by order of the Court. It is ditlerent from a plea in several respects. It is a part of the evidence in the cause. It h the pro perty.of the party, perhaps of both parties. But certainly it cannot be withdrawn by Mr. Neville in the face of the express prohibition of lii client, at whose instance it was filed,_nor under such cir cumstances would I recommend him to , withdraw it. It seemed to him that to ask a man to do what he had no right to do, never could be esteemed pro per in a Court of Justice, nor should his client un dertake to do that which is more than doubtful, could it have any effect in absolvinz him from the offence with which he was charged, He was either guilty or not guilty of a contempt, 'and if bevies not guilty, when the 'flute was enter- ed. he is not guilty now. The new offence of refit ;lug Ia withdraw, can not he added to the old, which toniists in presto FEB The following is the opinion of the Court, as furnished us by Judge Hegins himself : This rule is founded upon ,a contempt of this Court to presentin,g and requesting to he filed an Affidavit of Michael Murphy, in the matter of the application for 2 rule to show cause why a quo warranto should not issue ' against the Farmers' Bank of Schuylkill County. The Affidavit makes a statement of the private bus4oesis of a member of this Court with the Bank, part _of it true, but the most oft false; and the only purpose of 'this statement could be ti. give it publicity, fur it did not create a legal disqualificatioo in that member of Court to hear and de cide the case. But the Affidavit goes flir titer and directly impeaches the integrity of the Court. ft in effect asserts that the Pres ident of the Court is false to his oath of office, to the people who elected him, and to him self. This we have rightly considered- a' gross outrage uponiour official rights and a flagrant contempt of-this Court. Although our sense of judicial honor and integrity were thus outraged we did not ILA on the mo ment, as the impulses of our nature dictated, but allowed time to ourselves for cooler judg ment and to the counsel for reflection upon, and conviction of, the injustice 'he had done this Court, as well as himself ; a trieek was allowed to elapse before this rule was entered with the hope that Mr. Neville would volun• tarty do a simple act of justice to the Pres'. dent of the Court, by asking leave- to with draw the Affidavit and apologizing for his error of judgment, From the kindly private relations previously existing between us, we could not believe he intended thus publicly to insult us and and contemn our authority. Two weeks have passed since the rule was entered, and now Mr. Neville comes into Court and through his Counsel presents an Affidavit stating thayhe bad no intention to insult the President of the Court or contermi its authority ; but there is no offer to wjtir draw the foul slander upon his judicial tin tegritv from the record, or even a simple ac• koorviedgment of an error of, judgment and unintentional impropriety of official con duct. On the contrary he refuses to 'with draw the Affidavit upon the alleged refusal of his client, BlichaeL-Murphy, to permit him to do so, and he alleges that he has no au thority to withdraw it without such permis- a : d that he had no biw the affidavit; \ Nevffie to say s vn or, that the •ho had done e: to with ,, ereire a (14. lievo e r en fr r i sion. We are asked to subscribe to the doctrine that the fidelity, with which the Attorney is bound to act towards the Court, is not tcilie measured by his own capacity of judging of the true meaning of the term, and by .a high sense of the honor and dignity his own posi tion, as well as that of the Bench, but by the unlettered judgment of a client, with low notions of private or official integrity, and thus, no matter how gross the insult ani contempt of the Court, the Attorney may dis claim any disrespectful motive, plead the in structions of his client, and stepping behitti him, hold him up as a shield against merited punishment. But such a doctrine has no foundation or warrant either in morals or in law—it is without authority and precedetit, either in the proceedings of Courts of justice or the transactions of private life. The doc trine is founded upon a very, erroneous no -Lion of the official relations of the Bar and the the_ Bench, and would be subversive of the authority and dignity of the latter and proper personal respect of the former. The Attorney is sworn to act with all fidelity to the Court:as , well as to the client. His relative duties to the Court and the client under his oath are co extensive, and equally authoritative and bidd ing upon him. The client avails himself of the services of the Attorney, because of his superior legal attainments and knfirtyledge of the mode of conducting proceeding§ in Courts of-justice. The Attorney is expected to aid ' him by proper counsel ;• and while he. is bound to a faithful discharge of Ins duty to wards his client, he is as imperatively bound to act with fidelity to the Court, which ought to restrain him from impeaching its integrity tor contemning its authority. Fidelity "to the Court requires hint to advise the client against such conduct, and much more ought theletter and spirit of his oath of office: to restrain from becoming the medium of slander and contempt of the Court at the re quest offfie client. The only palliation fur conduct like this in an Attorney of the Court, is futinded like the fallability of human" udg ment ; but when the error is discovered, it is the first and most generous impulse of a no ble nature to acknowledge and correct it. It is argued hi the counsel of Mr. Neville that he tins not the power to withdraw the Affidavit. The position need only be stated to show its utter fallacy. The pleadings. in the cause are part of the record, and the pow er of the counsel to withdraw and alter them is uudisponsl and exercised every.day. The power of Mr. Neville to withdraw the Affi , davit, by leave of the Court, is clear and un doubted justice to the Court demands that a slander upon the Court ought not to be uttered in open Court, much less to rest among its public records, to the utter con tempt of its authority and disgracO of the i President of the Court n_ his official capacity and in his private relationship of kindred and friends. The Affidavit must be Withdraivn. If it is not, we will exercise an authority'not so clear, and strike it from the records. it is argued by die, counsel of Mr. Neville that the contempt consists in the motive with which the act is done, and not in the act it self. Thii is a refinement of legal construc tion to which we cannot subscribe. We can only judge of the motives from the acts of the individual—we cannot look into the breast and discover the hiddo impulses of human action. If the motive is a proper one, when the result of the action is discov ered and clearly appears to be one of great injustice -to another, a good'motive _would prompt an instant reparation of the injury. No Attorney of the Court, or sensible man in thiscommunity can.read the Affidavit without acknowledging that it 'contains a slander upon the President of the Court,,by impeaching his integrity as a Judge. If it was presented from no improper motive, but mere error of judgment, and a proper sense Of juitice would prompt its withdrawal. The circumstances under which this Affi davit was presented appear to justify ilieCon elusion of a deliberate design to outrage the feelings of the President of this Court, to intimidate him in the discharge of his Offi cial duties, and deter him from entering up on the records a 'decision publicly announced. When the suggestion was filed as the fouk dation for a rule to show'cause why a :writ of quo warrant° should not issue, the Presi dent of the Court intimated his doubts about the right of a private relator to file the sug gestion. The motion, however, was permit tad to ter entered end filler a full argument by • . Counsel, of which Mr.. Neville was one, the Court exprttssed their opinion that a construe. tion bad been placed upon the statute by the Supreme Court, in the case of the Commol tOraWrs,Barrelt, sod that no private rela tOr could file a suggestion as the the founda- , lion fiir a writ of quo treirranto, where the, corporate franchises of the Commonwealth have been usurped iby private citizens; but eould only be done by the Attorney General.' It was then stated by the Counsel, that an act had been passed at the recent session of the Legislature giving the power claimed to a private individual. The Court thereupon said that they would withhold their decision to give opporruniti to the Counsel to pro duce the Act of Assembly, and stated that WI it was produced they. would' grant the rule in Vacation, as they are authorized to do by the; statute. No such Act of Asssembly was I passed, and this was afterwards known to both the Counsel and 'the Client, and of Course they expected that the Court would enter their of the motion at the next session ofibe Court, in accordance with their opinion publicly announced at the pretrious term. In the m e antime knowledge of-the I private business of the 'President of the Court was obtained by a breach of trust on the part of him who furnished tt, and in ad dition to it information entirely false and en. true. To this was appended an impeach-, ' I meat of his official , integrity and the verified by the oath of Michael Murphy. For what purpose then was this Affidavit concocted, it not fur the purpose we have her fore intimated? And may we not, justly' , characterize it as a foul plot to impeach the honor and integrity of the President of this Court ? He assumed his present poaition un willingly, he knew its important duties and has applied his best abilities to perform them—he as well as his associates have a proper sense of the honor and dignity of their office—the law has clothed them with power to protect their honor and dignity in the exercise of their high functions against any contempt of the Court or its members. If they tailed to exercise it in a case like the preeilit, they would be false to the Consti tution and Laws of the country, to their of ficial oaths and to the people who elected them. Private feelings of sympathy must give way to a sense of public duty. Let the rule be made absolute and the name of J ohn C. Neville be stricken from the list of the Attorneys of this Court, and we direct the Prothonotary to erase the word " filed" on the Affidavit and return it to the Counsel who presented it. total affairri. Imo' Ma, it heib nanisev.--:Lerture Room of the lit Presbyterian Chmeh, 1852.—The teaehers of the IA Pre sbytehan bath School met, at the request of their Sup erint em dant, and the meeting was organized by calling the Rev. Tosrpti MeCoot. to the Chair, and el.'et iii JOSEPH L. OSLER SeCref3rr. The Chairman then stated the object of the meet ' ing, And J. AnntaoN MeCO9l, sal,mrttcd the thllow ing Preamble and Resolutions. which Were adolited : NVIIEREAS, It has pleased Almighty God in Ili, wise Providence, roddenly to remove Iron] among es by death, a mighty esteemed Itud beloYed Mllow teacher, the late MATruew RAMSEY ; ThCreliMV, be it Resolved, That in his death this Sunday School has lost a. Teacher -and a lrienif whose consistent life and pure precepts have been an honor to it. Resolved, That we will ever cherish! the recol !cation of his Christian virtues and great moral worth: Relayed, That the death of our late friend ad monishes us of the , uneertainty of life and the ii neat necessity of Leine. more earnestly enaneed it) the important ditties of our vocation a. Sunday School Teachers. Resolved, That we sincerely'and deeply sympa thise with the bereaved and afflicted parents and re lat ions of the deceased. Thvoterd, That tla• proceetlinv,s of this meetiruz be published in the filintra .Tournal, and that the Hon. Solomon Foster, Franklin P. Myers and Alex under S. Sillytnan, be. n Committee to pi.t..stait a co -p theae resolittionsto the family of tliti deceased. On Motion adjourned. Jos. L. Ost.lCR, Sec.!. LV - Unf wiunate Accident.- 7 Theliremature discharge of the cannon, oit Saturday, liY which most estimable young man of this Borough. Guns KREBS, had nearly lost' his life, was caused by the opembg of the relit, while he was in the act of ramming home the charge.. The rammer - took off his right arm a little above hi s wrist, and several splinters were afterwards extracted from his neck. The piece had been planted on the brow of an emi nence, some thirty or forty feet Melt, and as he fell, lie rolled dawn the embankment. Wiled picked tip, his body - presented such n horrible ,speemble, be spattered with blood, and his face lilnekeend with powder, that 'his tile was despaired of. Medical aid was immediately procured. his arm amplitated and his wounilS dre;setl. We are happy to state that he is ficiiv in a lair way to recover. II is pliy , e. eian,,we leant. pronounces' his sight Imitnpaire:il. and think:+,,excepting the loss of his hand, he will .sustain no permanent injury, not even any mark of the powder remaining. He is the son of Col. DAsim, Kn'ir.q, of this place, the present Indetxmdent candidate for •Con nge is about 20. He ha: been nniver sllly respected b); our citizens, as au active. indus trious and enterprising young man. For some eight years, he has been connected with our Borough Post-Oillee, where his services were almost indis pensable. Wtrare, molested to notice, in connection with w above, that the Annual Ball of the Wa4iington rullerks, of which Mr. KRCBS war: a much re- speeted member, announced for the inert., be postponed M the 2.5 th, a , a marl of . the Compa ny's respect toward him. Cam`,,fore Pottsville illariufactures.--We were shown a carriage, some days ago, manufac tured by our townsman, WNTATI A. which we pron?unCe the tie plug ultra mit, (ma It w a s built to order, the purchaser requiring something light and convenient for one horse, and, at the same time, strong enough to stand the wear and tear of our rongh mountain rnads. v It combined all these requisites SO admirably, we could hardly imagine anything could be made to suit the description bet ter—being altogether just thr Carriage for the mo ney. Several late improvetnents werii introduced, giving it additional advantages, and its firiish is sel dom excelled. We recommend Mr. KIRK to the public with per-feet confidence in his ability to ren der his cuitomers entire satisfaction. Reading Brass Band.—On Saturday night last, after the exercise!. of the day,the Inde pendent American . ißrass I3and of Reading, Mr. JOSEPU BriAnEerct.;u leader, made a short semna ding totir bout town. They perfernfed mita ihibly -Ave afterwards heard numerous eulogies in 't heir favor fromthrise whose praises are worth treasu ring. In addition to their skilful execution, their Mites are selected with wee and appropriateness, indicative of artistic talent, as well as , mere mecha nittal ability. This Biend numbers um members— hut six were presenon Saturday night—they also me stringed.instrut4Mts for balls, parties, ke.—We have frequently ermaged them an d testify idthe excellent music they make. Ur "Take a Weed?"—Smokets, in search of good segars, (and they nrea scarce article.) can be accOmnuxlated at hams M. iluArrr They have just received a large and varied assort ment of the best manutheture—their " Plantation " segar is a capital article. These gentlemen pay un usual attention to the selection of theit tobacco, and therefore deserve the thanks and patronage of the smoking and chewing community; .since, if " the weed" 'mustand will be used, we recommend„as in the drinking of liquors,' only the best males.: UT The Schuylkill County Ag,ricultura Society will, hold itm firqlannual exhibition at JAS LEssia's,. North Manheirrt township, 'We/laps day and Thurrday, 27'tlt and 28th inst.. It i s expee led to be a most interetting occasion. la7 . lVe are reque,iled to give notice that a Bn4ne3n meeting of the 'Literary SotietY will be held at the office of WILLIAM L. WHITNEY, Esti, nest Wednesday evening. tillAttAdt FOIL OCTOTIEII k another supe jor number of this exeellcut ItLigazifte. Its reading . matter is composed of a large number of interest ing and valuable contributions, such as are worthy Any literary work. „It also eontainS dome sixteen embellishments.. drahant believe 4 in progress.= Price of lifaga;:ints Si a year or 25 cents a number —to be had at 13ANNAN's,--- • • .• Tne Pozat on the " Suslinebana" shall appear next week'. • , o:7',PuncA says it has beet proposed to tax stays, but it was objected won the ground that it would diminish cortsumpuon. lig" The Queers of Spain is again reported, by the Spanish papers, to be in au intereq ing state. - • • I ll= 11:7' MAn oir THE 'Mina. Late;—The Gardiner Fountain classes the new Lep; la ture on the Liquor Law, as follows:-=Sen ate—For the Law, 19; against it, 2. House —For the Law,' ;= against it, 22, and some twenty or thirty not definitely heard from. • 117 REV. A. T. Foss.—lt is said that Pair ion Foss of New Hampshire, has gone South to sue General Houston for libel, in charging him with having been in the State Prison for horse Stealing. , (17- .4 Lau. in Massachusetts makes ab senteeism from 'school a crime. and a truant child can be taken from the care"of Its Dam• rat protectors, when its italic's:us tail in theii duty. The city authorities of 'Boston are taking the most , vigoround effective mea sures to enforce the statute. • IN ONE OR TWO of our last numbers, we called the attention of our readers to Dr. Cooper's medi cines,prepa red by C. P: lie wes. These medicines, as we stated, have performed wonders, Ind almost mir acles. Even physicians acknowledge i the superiority t.fpoine of them oi;er all other . knowA preparations.. We give below a certificate of a woriderful cure of Consumption, which is testified to by one Physician who attended the patient, and 'also by Peter Liver gond, (ei•Canal Commissioner) who is a gentleman well known in this State: °wise:m.lloN Ceßp.—l do certify, that my wife w.ts severely afflicted with Pulmonary Consumption for twelve years, and for about three years and s 4 months she wasnot able to get out of her bed„re quiring a mitre all that time. 1 had applied to Sev en doctors; they all failed and thought it impossible to cure her. She pined away to within' but the ap pearance of skin and bones—all hopes fur her recov ery were despaired of byaill that had seen her, which were not a few. Hearing Ci . toper's In dian Vegetsbte Cough, or Consumptive Syrup, for the elite of Colds,, Caugh`s,Spittlng Blood, Whooping_ I Cough and Consumption,l was at last persuaded to try It ; she took this medicine for three months, and with the most Irtopy effects. :lie has got well and is able io do her %%nit once more, 10 the astonishment of the whole neighborhood. This true certificate I give of my own free will, in order that othersolilleted with the same disease, may have an opportunity of being cured of this distressing disorder. CHRISTIAN MILLER, '.Fitness Dll. Wrt.t.,sx HATS, PrrEn Liv miaow), (Canal Corn.) We take pleasure in recommending this medicine to the niiiirteJ ofthie plare r and are happy to inform them that the genuine ran he !IA of John S. C. Mar tin, Pottsville. 40-3 t COMFORT FOI2 TIIE MtED.—The Montreal Tra nscript, one of the best papers in 'Canada, speaking of %V igar's llalsantof Wild Cherry, June 19, 18.19, says e believe it be generally recognized as *use ful medicine by medical men, aid we can state with perfect Huth and sincerity, that in one rase with is filch we are mire particularly acquainted—that of an hid gentlemah, at leaJt eighty year,. of age, re sitting a few ItuleS:from this city, and who Is trwubled at times with an':istfunattdal complaint, the watt de- cided relief is cditained whenever he waken tie of the halsltn,--thi.t, at qt. , advanced period of lir, at ti hull h. has airivtd, may be considered an unan qwerable 1 f c ! i• ila v uturs. tIR TIIE BOSTON DAILY DEC:I 'From afll3lo little experience of nor own, we testify the superiotily Of the. Balsam. of Wild Cheri'', and we have two, riipeatedly assured by quite a number of Our per.onal friends who have used it with suc cess in pulmonary vomplaints,4tie plithi.le, asthma, night sweats, dce., tlat they regard it us one of the mast benerleient remedial agents of the time. Seth W. Powte, Uruggist,No. 139 Washington Rt., ft.vtoll:Naes.„ iS the sole proprietor of the original receipt . for the ins nufai lure lathe genuine medicine, and supplies both at wholesale and retail, and of whom agencies ran toy:do:lined. Look .tut Mr imitations and counterfeits. Remem ber the n'ilginaripid only genuine ankle always beats the written gignitture of I. BUTTS upon the outside wrapper. • ; INFI.AMMATtIIN OF TUC EVES,.— Weir/it's In; dian Vrvtable eillg will he funad a certain cure for: the above painful malady ; because they purge from the boil y. Ihrue cortlipt and stagnant humors which ate the cause lint only of ibflainai ion of the eyes, but: of every description 6141h:ease. Front th roe to els the above natoi'il Indian Vegetable Pills, taken every night on going to bed, will in a Minn-time enmplete-' ly rid the body of everything that is opposed to health, and therefore, will assuredly make a perfect cure or innammati.on of the e)es,ntid at the:same time, the bind and Miler tinids will be of such a healthy quality, that disease of Any kind wilfl) . " absolutely impossible. &rare . of Counterfiits. The genuine lo for 6=lll T F. It EAvry J and N. II LEI?, the Agenir given in another column. Wholesale °thee, 169 flare Street, Phila. AN nu NeE OF FACT is Worth a pound of theory ; and the 'swarm ufconcluxivc facts that cluster round that incomparahl prepatation, IfonfLand's German Bitters, pr-pared by Dr. C. M. Jackson. Philadelphia establishing its value as a tonic and restorative, are such as would prevent incredulity itself from 4111.41. tins ing ttx efficacy. 'ln all cases of disease of lito7 mat h. whether Scuts or c hronic, it may be recom. uu•odedifor its sinullinz, cordial, and renovating influ ence. /ysitvp-da, hart-but n, loss of appetite. tiatt sea. nervous trr.mors, telata relieved, by the. Iditters, in a very short spare of time am! a pSiseverane,e he their use never Nils to wink is thorough core. 39-4mcow ANirruFat sciENTtriilwoNime!—lNtPOßT act to Dyspeptics.—Dr..l. B.llioughtnit's l'epskt, Tet t Dierstire Fluul or Gastric fillet, prepared front Ren net, or the Fourth ettoreach Ox, after directions of Baron the great 146sintoeical Chemist, by J. S. !limeMen. M. 11., l'hiljabilpttia. This Is truly a wonderful remedy for Iniligkstien Dyspepsia, Jaun diee, tires Couuttailit.Congtipation and Debility, co tine alter Nats own method, by Nature's own a cent, the Oastiic Juice. Pamphlets, containing Men title evidence of Its value, furnished by agents gratis. See notice among the medical advertisements. • Tit the Editor of, ike Miners' Journal lit:an Is in : I nee by the last Journal, that at a pub lie meeting, brut nt the Halt-Way Mow., on the 23d, to take up a candidate for Congress in opposislon to col. STRAVII,IIIat my placed on the committee to publish- ati eiddiesa to the voters of this Congres sional district, I must decline the honor of eild volittenent. which was inade without my knowledge of consent, and Ile 1 intend to support l'ol: den syn. the regair nominee of the party. Respectfully yours, l/IMER TAGGAP.T.' . 40-It• • WE WOULD LAU. your attentkati n the silver - tiAenient Pant; en, for the citron( Scrofula, in another column. -39-2 m 4': POTTSVILL CORRECTRD W EMIL Wheat Flour, 1.1,1 S 5 COred penche4 plied. sil AO do do 3So do do Rye untat'4l. 0 60 Wheat, bushel 95 a 1 0 0 . Prd a liPleff Paired 1 75- Rye, do 7 i Egg'' , .loam 13 Corn, do • :ill 2uiit:t 4 . - 16 flota, do 40 Shoulderi. :10 Fotltorot, 110 . 40 a5O I Homy, ' ' 1110,14 Timothy vlee•Ce • - 225 Ilayoah 14.50 Clover do . 350 Floater. SOO 14TABRIED On OP '2(411 ult..tly the BPI?. I, E. Cuelr. EDWARD 111 1 :1t1tF.RGER, of ft-inr Gap. Wiconiero Town, Dan nnon County, to 61.11.11 sirtIROPP, of Tremont. Schuylkill County. . At Si. CI Sr, nu 30th ult.' by Ole Rev. Joseph ;11.•Conl of Potissille. WILLIAM 0. HARRIS In MA IO,' 51 ASON; h'oth of St. lists. Schuylkill county.. On the .17th 'nit.. by the Rev. William Morgan. WM LIAM JENKINS to ELIZABETH DAVIES, both nf On the afternoon of the 30th Rent . .. 1652. at Rt. Rchuylkili County. HENRY P 1111.11• KIJECIIBN• THAI.. In the fat year of itis age„at the rraidence.of his son-In.lasv, George N. Rept.tier. The friends (tithe fantity are reapeetfully Invited to attend the funeral, !hi.; aftetnoon, at teduck., In the city , ofJarkson, Misr., on the 12th alt.. WIL LIAM 11. 1111]1.1„ formerly of Port Carbon, aged ' 32 yea r 4. :.Al the residence of her husband. John Tudhunter. of littAville; Illinois. nn Tuesday. the Nth ult., MAR TI] A TOIIIIIINTEIL in the 42d year of her age - • • Mrs. Teribunter was the daughter of ,Ralph and Martha Ire, was born In Grassington, Yorkshire, Eitnland, in the year VII. She emigrated to the Uni ted Prates with her father In the year 1831, and set. tied in Pottsville. Pa. In 1831 she was married to Mr. Tadhunter, and removed itntnedlatcly afterwards to this place. • • • Pew events' have an much . startled 'out village, as the sudden 'death of this worthy laity. She wail 'of the number of those we call our early settlers, which to the inhabitants of a new country, invests death i me ir with a peculiar Interest. She was here to wit ness the ravages ;of the plague, in its first as well as Ito last visit ; and all the - self-denials incident to early settler., she Ins cheerfully met and rutty encountered. In her deportment she was tin obtrtisiVe, hot frank, cheerful, end generous. As a friend. she Was Stesdfast. sympathizing, and single hearted.• Ad a Christian, she was distltiltUtehed for uniformity4f good works rather than for fitful amo tinny. evie, was without guile, without envying*, without 61,070 w—but full of love, Joy, peace; leng suffering, gentleness, goodhess. lauh• For severs , years she has adorned u, profession in the Episctipal Church—a service and faith she could love without exeltutiveness;and without bigotry. As a wife and mother, whilst her virtues can, In a measure, be estimated by those who witnessed ',her assiduity, cheerfulness , . and he uderneu:s in *betimes ' tic cirble, and the acute grief exhibited by heefairlly and frt.-Waal her death, their full measure can alnne be felt by The sorely afflicted husband and children she hail so long cheered and sheltered. For many years she his inhabited an uncertain tenement in the nosh;-yet she was ever ready to put It off foi a 'glorious mansion in [leaven. tier last short illnras. full sof suffering and anguish, was borne with a fortitude such as a Christian mother only ev er displays'. sdhe has . 0 gone up," h Is true,". with Much tribulation," hut has become another witness fur t of her Lord : `•Though ye walk through t era they shall not ovettlow d deeply affected concourse whirls fol. In a grave, furnished the sealing evidence or and of thedeep hold which her' IMob. •trusivis srpitit had Recoiled fir her In our sympatbloi. Trlegralk ElsrAwitirp•Rihuie. • • - VP* =ERE WILL 1:1_ r. preaching tn the EngliFtt LuthertanChneeb,Market street' every Sun4,3y morning' all d evening. TEIS BAPTIST CHUM:B.—Divine arotehlp +.l"' may be esperted every Sabbath morning end evenir.i., also every Weilliev,„!ay evening, et the wale 'hours 1 prop THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH. tb' —The f - olinwina Resolution .has been passed by the Vestry of Trinity Church, Pottsvitle. • Resoloa, That in consideratirin of the suing con tributed and to be contributed aidonatihns to the erec tion and furnighini of the church edifice the vestry do hereby get apart, and appropriate FIFTY-LIMIT PEWS, which shall be, and reingin fete lot all persors hrho may desire to worship in 'the -Chutch. There peke arc located as 4 - nitOW • IN Tlll , l CENTEE AISLE. North aide, No.l 11, 119,1Y7, 135,143, 151,159. South ride, N 0,112, 120, IV 13d. 111, 152,100. IN TUE NORTH AISLE. North side, No. 1,7, 13,18, 25, 31, *uthaide, N 0.2, S. It, 20, 26. 32, . .- . . .. . south shle. No. 50. r.v3,110 74..80, 86, id, 95,101 010. North able, N 0.59. 6:- 73, 30 SY.M. 97. 103400. ' DIVINE SERVIC E held in the Church every sun day. Morning Service commences et 10 o'clock.— .11(tersOon Service conunenccs a t:41• o'clock. P.NOTICE.—At a meeting: of .ha gttuck holders of the Paltsvllle and Tainailua Telegraph Cum. paay, held at the house or Ewd. Carey, Ididdiepart. dept. 27 1952, the follnwin; tentlenwn were duly erected nfficers of said Company President—R. CARTER-. of Tamaqua. Secretaiy—Thonias Burkhart, of New Philadelphia. Trills:ivy—H. F. Il6as, of Ttiscatora. Directors—Roland Jones. Tamaqua; H. Meyer*. Dattersorr: . d. .1. Connor, NeW Philadelphia; Alex. Biilyman, Tuscarora ; Chas. Bennett, Middleport GUiter MOO. Port Carbon; Daniel Lam., POO3V MO: Otniral Directors—Messrs. SJtaw. Minix & Barnes. Contractorsbd Builders: ; The followi a rrg resolution wan pained by the emu tt pay : , Res&lred, at the Constructors of thin Line be requested to re their best endeavors to (ram a Com pany to anal tte a line, In connection with this, to Philadelphia 4 and that we recommend as extensive Continuance ql thin line as Possible. and we.acreeto ro[operate will' the said Constrimtdrilin making this line as extensive an possible. . Taos. 131:1111I II AUT. Sec' y. IS• Tamaqua Le:iou'pleage copy, 3 antes, mark price and send Bill to this office. Or I. 2. 1t332. • 40 3 t jp-ts AT A 1111..L1ING 01 the r oat licalere 01 the Kr' city of Beading, held inept. 1852, the fonnw• Ing preamble and resolution was unanimously agreed WIIKREAII. Several Coal SIIIPPere . of Schuylkill County are supplying Coal by the Car to our custo mers noon the same terms thatahey supply us by the quantity, • Resolved, That we will—nor, In future, purchase Coal from any person or persOns who sell to those Who are not dealers or manufacturers In tbo city of Reading. Signed,. S. L. Snyder. . L. &J. 11. Knabb & Co., Sam'l. R. Smeck, Wm'. I,lh:diner. Sherman & Winter, John Setley, Kboiluger & Fry, Nagle At Moser. • Isaiah Wills. Frees & Moll. Oct. 2, 1852. , 40 lb* A STATED MEETING yik ill Coi;ii ty Medical Society will he beta in the Borough of Pottsville. at il.e Council Chamber, on Wednes day. October 6, 1652, at 2 o'clock, P. M. Punctual atimeictancf, is requested Davini. McKinnon. flec'y. ROinerset County, Pa D TiiE SEMI-ANNUAL Mooting of tho Stock Xs' holders of Oa ?drehafiir Navlfig ,Fund APYOPiII lion of Pottsville will he het.l.nt the house of Joßept Kline,on MONDAY evening, Ort. 4,1r.52. at In'rlo.lc to.elect (our Dlre'clors. Punctual ittiendanre 14 re .lagevs Focul% Seey. C"ifolfNg LAUREL CCM ETEUV.—PERSONS f dealt frig Lots. or Crave• En Mount Laurel Come tory, under the direction aloe Vestry of Trinity l'hurch, Pointy ill.. Will apply I.) Andrew Ituortel,or F. U Parr Y. Court ANTED.--Three MaleXeachers to take charge V V of the Public Schools It, the Barry School Dis trict, to commence on the Ist of November. .Direc tors meet at the house of P. D'engler„ 25th of October. at 1 P. M., to teeeive applicat how. By (order of the Board. JOHN A.OTTO, Rec'y. Barry, Oct. 2, 1652. 40 , 11. ANTED AT th« Dauphin and Susque hanna VV Coal Company's IVorksi.:in Dauphin and Leba non Counties, Miners and rarpenters, to whom good wages and steady employment will he given. Paid in cash ;everymonth. Apply !on the premises t JOllll4 R. GARLAND, eq. Sept- 25.1652. 39-3 t T r ANTED—IMMEDIATELY-OTb or #lOO, for V Much the hen rieturity will be given. / For fur. ther Information apply at (hip office. Sept.'l6. 1252. • , 36- Tvamma ,Svpt. 30th, 1E152 MARKETS. ' FOR TIIR JOURNAL DIED, itradiawas Nvizams.. IN TIIE SWtTII AISLE NOTICES. WANTEi), &c NOTICES. - : MOTlCE.—Notice herOiy,given thattetters of LI Administration, with Hid nitrieupativ Will of Illizsbeth Zimmerman, lam Blared County:deceased, have been panted by Lewis Reeser, Register of Wills, &e., in and for Pahl Coun ty. Cr) Abraham Zimmerman. Jr.,. restilii,g near the Public House of Franck Dengler, in Barry;Townslim, Schuylkill County. All persOns having clidins aga hod the said estate, and all persons indebted to the sante, ere hereby, therefore, notified to call at the house of the said Administrator and shake settlement, &c. ABRAHAM 7. IMMERMi Adtu'r. Oct. 2,1852. J •111-.6t • OTICE IS hereby givenothat tltt• Register of 1. Wilts, Sce., of the Counti of St.htqlkill,.h.ts gran. led Letters Testamentary tolthe subscriber, Executor of the last Will and Testament of Cathay ine Jones, late of the said County. der:eased. All persons in 11 - deliteil, will please make payment, and those !Livia:: claims against said deceased, will prM:ent them im- I mediately for settlement in ills suletcriber. residing in I] Minersville Street, in the Ildrough of ;Pott,vilte. MARY .ANN MILLS, Executor. ( Oct 2, 1552. - i 40 fa' fIAUTION.—AII peismig not employed at , our k-c Colliery, are hereby forbid takin g from the tips, or any place around the Clhery. I 1 itik cau tion IA disregarded, we will. pro:wrote ull'olrenders to the full extent of the lavie, %ITN!. & 41108. JOIINS. Oct 2,1,152. 40-11 • I'TICE TO DIMINO COMPANIES.— Tilif I! STEAM-ENGINES MISSION ERY, &c., For Sate. at Flemington, Iliintertliin Co., New Jer sey.--The '' Flemington " land .7 Central '• Mining Companies nnw offer for wile, at great aarrificr, all their valuable Mining Machinery, minding one high pree.ttre Engine, of ten -harse power, with lloilyr one highly-finished One, of bu l ly do., whi t sour hoil era; one. recently built, by; SteseYs. Va 'Were & Mc- Kean, of Trenton, In thu hen ttihnner, of two .huti dred horsepower, with two Hailers, Alen, a large improved " Cruiher," 4nd appurtenances ; one algid-inch Plunger-Pump, with ten-inch column, of nue-hundred fret; one ten-iprh Lift-Ptimp," 01 one hundred feet, and a aiarilliy of Mining Tonle and Materials. At the Alines, ter examine the !petit port, apply to Mr. JACOB CARKIIIIFF, and tot fur ther particular., in the Flettlingion Copper Company, No. ft CARPENTER'S Court, Philadelphia. Sept. 25, 1851. ts.*... 39 4t VOTICE TO CONTRACTORS.—OFFICE 1 1 of the Dauphin and Suaipoihanna Coal Company, No. 54 WALL Street, Nrw Yrirk, September 22, 1852 —Pinpoints wilt he Co •el•eat u ntil the 15th day of Oc tober next, for the gradtiation inaannry and bridging of that part - of the . .. Dauphin Jill 'Susonehanna Coal, Comp iny's RAUH - ma, extending ham n e ar Hausa, cyq on the line now open for ten el, In Auburn on the Philadelphia and Reading; ailroad, a distance of about 34 mile?. The character of the work i ouch, as to render ft well worthy the attention contrarters, and pay wilts will be made In faith. The Direcons reserve the right of rejecting any 'proposals that may be deemed unsatisfactory. Plans, profiles, Ac.. ran he deen, and farther infor mation he obtained, by applichtion to the Chief En gineer, Richard 11. Oattorne; tr the Company's Office, N0.:3 South Ft - BIRTH St. Philadelphia, after the thh of October next, or on nppliCation to the, tinder to be iddressoo A. signed. Pro- eroposala _ a. tary. (marked Proposals for pra l ling,&e..) at them'. free of the Company. 54 W 61J, elyeet. New York. THOMits CHAMBER:4. Pre.t . t. 39-3 t IE2E3=I DISSOLUTION OP: ' AnTNERSIIIP.,- Notice ts hereby givert,tbat the limited partner ship. heretofore existing hetwe'cre the undersigned, under the name of AI. llci*t.lea iirILIVPII, for the minim buying, Felling nifid tianeportiog of Coat, which commenced on the 11th day of September, 1851, and was to terminate on th @ first day of April, 1857. and a certificate of which vi , 4 duly recorded and fired in the Office of the Retinae of . fireda or 'Schuylkill County, was dissolved by tl e Mutual al reement of the parties, nn Friday, the ; tenth day of September, 1852. Al.i 41orrunn 11EILNE11. DAN'L.: R. BENNETT. Blinersville, Sept. 14th. !Bp2. I -44 COITNTV, On the 11th day of Septent i ber, A. 11.. 15.52. before L• me, Bltt SICCLOiAritsN'. .111StIre ottlie Pelee In end for *Aid Schuylkill Canoty..personally.appeared Daniel R. Bennett 2nd ?.t p,ttlieb !tanner. whose names are sill liscr...ih d e.. to thf Integfong nntice of dis solution of narttiershlp, ohyl severally . acknowledged that they had executed thd ppnid,nntice, and the same was their act and deed. { In test talon/ whereof,' have heregintd set my hand and seal, the day and yeatilitforesaigl. „! fiLAlß,mecEEN*ctiAs. I !mall 14 I Hit FrPt. I. 1852. II iCGISTRATIOti LAM ttooks for the Regis ration of 0 irtlw,Marriages and Deattie. have Wien reeeiveilifronv Harrisburg, by the Reelvter of SchtlylkilliCotinty, and blank returns can be had anti,' nettle Registen's Office. It Li, (hemline, made the duty aniLwill be!esaeeted that, the'pertions named in the aed will Makirk heir returns Wording to law, and especially thalithi Physicians will prompt ly attend to this matter, isithe • law prevents the Is fining °Metiers of Afiminhltratiou or Letters Testa mentary on the estatii;ofainy deceased person. unless the death is 'Met ItegisteritiL and also forhidi the ap• pnintment of guardians inilkss the birth of the minor, dre., is first Registered aciidwilris to law. 'LEWIS REESER, Register. f 3B-tf DIM DissoLuTioN.;—N4 ice 'ls hereby . given, that . the ra•partuersliin itiiretolbre existing between William Liitleliales and j 'Andrew Robinson, wading, &c , gimlet the - style .1 11 t. 3.irrcittacas & R6BINIsom, was this day dissolve r' 1 , cnnsent. .AII tier wins indebted to the said! rm,:and all having claims W s ) against them, w ILLI ill AM pletive 1 TTLEII AI Es ake:settlert to . , : 4 *. Clair. .** August 31, 1832. lei,rn. 4,1E32., 36-tits J .s" and flittdren's lire illerer, tomer of Centre and ile; 1 ntt pi,, RB. FUNKS, IVI.Mar and Embr Union Rterte,. 2:5!,An Apprentice Oct. 2,1852. EMIT i I—T. F. BEAT st Iteceived n very choice as. dltask Tens. Almn,Lewle Evans & Swill's fine Pickles In 1415, Mon, Figs, Patina, Cotoa and Chocolate qryci 4tructs of Vanlita.Lrm :4B;e. . • _ 19-tf I , slist TEASE TV Sr. 'CO. Itaiele sortment or Green bud ebrated Bugai Cured cured Dried Beer. Pickled Palmi'mi, Fine Salad Oit; Cornetts, - Baker's (Irma, Lea,vit Vs pure Concentr on. Orabge, Nutmeg, St Wins N. !Mag. RENT..—A cont!enicia Brick Damning , -In • I Maturntonen Street.ii Ann; 8150 per annum. In. qUlre at this office, or ar J. F. MST.% DT, Pdahlotongo Street. Ir. . 38-tr &pt. 18,1852 ion. SALE:—A Viquaiti-lot on the corner of .k.' Market and Condi:rut] 4,treetit, In the Borough of Pottsville. Apply to the OW Ilcr t RFERT ROO BM, Minersvllle ;or to Bevil WM. ORGAN. opposite the, Court Elowie t rottilie. .05.7.1855 i .. d 1 ._ i I ; . Mao . - , , outwits.° nonos!MlTlPazo flours! o rritinderolp o„ rd again reining thanks to thep j It s , foe foe put favors, and respectfully announces to his (lulu's and the citizens generally. that, oaring t,, the li eralpatronase extended to him heretofore, b e now, ken the occasion to say that he has jnst it _ celve a full assortment of IlIfFrA 7 l a L.O BODES, direct from St.,loutis. „.„, , ,pezz' Ile pas, also, all kinds of Trap- 4 r":"A pings, such as beleve to Ills line of fl i c . ,. lIL. SustrMss, such Si Horse Covers. ..i... , ,,- ,,, ,,._ 4 7 , Blankets, Bells. &e..,,1kc. Ile Is at so well prepared to furnish all kinds of Pine et rriAs., Harney!. and aidinit Saddles for .10dies and (ienti e wen r,l inferinr in quality, to n 5 other estaldndimen t tat Futile or a,tiroad, and on the anon,. acionmi,li ttni; tertiA, Ali kinds of hoar, y harness, or such as' emit Oust.. atorips IVazonets need, on hand, in full supply_ anti ready, at any amateur, to fill ail orders prompt. ly anklivith despatch. Plekee site us a call before purchasing eismb en . , Ther6 can be La filss in examining my renndA. I 1.1.3 , EvER lA'OM EI:AM:II4'. Centro ' . . , 1., oppnette the Episcopal Clown. (loci. 2, 18.52. . 40.trn 37,43, M, 52,51,55 3S, 44,50,52. WASECINGTON IRON WORKS, POTTSVILLE, I.A. J WREN & re,oectiolly incite the att, t . tion of the hiniine-ii ronitiftinity to their NewMi clung Shop and Voundry, etecte l hctween, freal and Ralhoa,t zattvela. an.l troatill in Norwegian Street, wher i e they are prepared to rixec titeiall order/ forMarhinery of liras, and I rim,such 19 Steam Engiticil, ilt kind/ of Gen ring fir Grotla ad Saw Mill... Si n -tie and 'Muhl , ' artleg rotor., real Ilteaker•Olt lit Caro, all kind of Ca 1. road Pastings, snrh Chain,, for tier and T Rail; Erno,lKw itc Ac ; all kind.- of c.ist nod wrought Iron Shafting. fteiiig Practical Meetianirs, snit ails haat 1g made the deinanils of the Coat Region their nlu.l for yearn, also k trip of NTArhinery in their line ..,3f.busitleas.. they flitter Midi work ilong it their thitablislinient :will give sati3factlon to all who may honor them wulia call. All orders thank fitlly, received and y cart-wed nn the MOM lea. sonahle terrna. • JOWN V.-WREN, Titimt AS .WItEN. JAMES WREN. 4045 MIM WITEENGTON &,.' WILDE, A t Timm ut.i) srANP..-Ao. 7 and g nurcli liiStrtit. betwtrn .1 ih 0 .i. , Fnilto It . (Oponnue Wm. Col at,. & Co. sus. l'ar tory.) Al: ts - Iron, tl K con lour to ropply Morrnnuol, Country Dralorp. and Olbrill With I h, first a rticle of CoSfes,Grern, 'toasted or (4round. Alto.. . Cr'. Poppor, Cr'.) Alviocr. NIAMPI:i. 10 (311111.1111011. 1 . :1)11111.• ['yr Vol'. 5111914 . dii Cloves, Indigo, ItIWN y Seed, dg IGlneer. 11 t ,•. AlsO a superior article of flier Flour and Cocom,tlii to any tottnufnetored. •. The goods of the olswe well known house need nii reettneuilation. ihey tieing caret:idly geleriell pre mt . ., from the Lett artklea in nittrket. W. &g . w 041.1 mall psrlirui.tr httelition In iltrlr ..torte of 1 :1,,n, ,runic or own impor. ins, whirl. ling ritPililfi , lUred nee of itie - finest In Sb iiirts, and 17minii, 14,,,kr i t would do well to rail anil!examine their stock, and the quality aed stir of tbe# ground Spic,r. N. 13.—A1l arttcleA hearing the nalun of the funi ma be relied npon as strictly pure Oct. 2, 1. , 01. 4.1. ra AlerckaNts, J MUShtppersTA, Il RD rulrrista and 611;7;7: 4 . ITIIINGT(:N 4t. WIt.IIE'S CelThrated Pretna. AlusTApp, put up eviiresely for the timilhern .antyWestern Market, in lives.. Cans. Tins and Got ilea This Mustard is mode from the best English anti Italian Seed .and nectlA no tinter recommendation than the extensive sale l lt ha. met wilh for the pan nut' ibit r of years, and belng in constant use by the li. to. imy and many nf,the Hospitals to the. Ir - ti t le d Sta es. For wale by 1 • WITHIN:GT(IN kr %THAW., At Illieir Coirel. 'and tfliVit Factory. Na. 7 MITCH :Yireet. New Vork„ tiinposite Win. rolgates..k, Co. Slap r,.ctorya) 11:1. 2,11,2 -. 40-:lm , •_ NEW FALL GOODS. TOIINsTON & I.'o. have: jusf•recelv'ed a 'owlet.' a !dlijoinsl onpnly of fresh VA IL 00011)1,:.,,,h ihe'v are now opening!. and to which they - weittO 4,.. sli• particularly lo cull the' attention of their ffitbdr, and the robin. generally. Their /dock having this ' attiltional supply, i, , , unit' on extensive , an 42 l , am m plei In ,•nutmand the attention of buyers, Mid tiny feel confident of tieing able to soliply any reasonable de. mobil, especially lit the Dry Good. depa itinetit. Thyy ha 0 not neglected the Grociry and Provision dream me t, as well also as Ciocke:y Ware, a:lof which ha 'e been abundantly replenkhed. ' i I ottsville, Oct 2, 15541 , DANCING ACADEMY. ryinE underaigned respectfully announces to- the citizens of Pottsville. that lie proposes to opim his, Dant ing Aratlentv.al the. Town !tall, nn Wed ne4day. the Gth of October; for one term of twenly finCr I.ro.nno. Thankful fro the liberal patronage- hi, retleived !otitis place last whiter, i.e confidently stV. , iiclts the continued confidence of parents, assuring them that he will spare no pains to deserve it. ilours of tujilon from n o'clock to 51 o'clock, P. 51. 1 The following dances will he taught.: Frenelt Quadrille, in New Nlaturka Waltz, Tork atyleF • New Polka Waltz ; rninet Omattriile, Polka Waltz, Mazurka (brut: ilk., Plain Waltz Polka Qti Mono, efiaitch Waltz, Milonaise. - Gallopade Waltz, Stianiali Dance. Ilitp Waltz, Ttlmpete, Rettowa Waltz, Millet Polka, , Plsin Cotillion. Virginia Reel, N. Vork Plain Cotillion. • I .A1:1:11S7• FREIM11.1.1:11. ) et 2,11452 . 40 It -- ' LIST: OF LETTERS lii EMAINING in the Post (Slice at Pottsville. Pa. It 0rt.,1, 1552. Allwell James Goncher %Vila Mansion 51 Darr WM _Gerreld Wm Huger Prier (blight Datil GruherE II lilini.oll A nuttier Pierre Gerrard .la. shipMurphe Mariam Ilrophy Tams Howe!. Won Miller F Mitorton F nu g hev R.l Meridith .1 chip Blown Davis 2. Hampton [Mel. Martin Chas An Boyers:Milt Dal num 1: W Mutiny Chas do 11: ker F. II i Ilt.ifinan Henry McConnell II Merman Jamel Illittbrohitz WmslrGtiffJ Milligan Chas Illeininger John McKale T ship Iltiadle Miss Si Alli.iimil John McElew Wm iln Blackburn .1 shiplintontel Martin ' Rothermel E Ilyle William Hanley Jglitt Rieland P.l C. ok C lieckihani.l Rosenthal A Concklin C C Heitz Jarnh , Rosenhery A Ibildwell Thins Diarney:St._'. Ryan J Ctinper %Villiani llnteltinsowE 11 barb II ii CJ9VadV Mll 2 Ilarrisidorgan Quinn 5' Cl:oian F shipllittchinsnn Win Prichard C thta CSitiety -Iffni2libbn Jame. Ii Neil It 1/Ougnerty Thou Henry Joiseplt (►'Boyle PM Dingier Joseph Iles. Mary Stel.llll Devine_Thomas Matt Tito..lollollllo .1 Ilbolity:: rtil Higher, M Shead - John A 11.isliee,lacoli Ilminelley John 14Pciair I:en Dougherty Mary Jones Il I. ' Saltier Chat • P(mea Joint Jones Migthirta Steckel We, 0 lid Thomas Jones Anna Skeffinging SI 1 oiler' I.' Kauffman .1 Sherhlap T ship 1 tvei. T n sill:Melly 711 n) , Steiner II do 1) rough I) Keifer I. Teed John Dia / burry J Kline Ilanttah Thompson Sarah Ilkap Thomas Kenna Mary Thomas Tline rip Faist!r Georg° Llewellyn Wm 2 Tee nos do VA: y .10 it la laither. Margret Wagenseller C, , Finn Con . 1,11 - 1. carol, Weidner Ell F :awry Thos Linwood .1 shipWalsli Thomas Gigabit' TKO!. Little Pat'rk do Wagner John r tt ine cent additional will be charred for nit adv , r , / , ' et letters.- Persons applying for leers on Ms hot, Wall pleace say " advertised." ANDREW MORTIMER. P M. l Oct. 2,1'352. . 40-It li 4DV & ELLIOTT, Agents for the sale of Adam %A 1, Mai Rapprs Patented Scientific d anlilVens. Oct. 2, 1K52: 'LAIRS! CII ftS I —tVtlOir.oo.o,l Rita v/Friney cane seal Chum.. Reception Chair , Arm and Rocking Ch.iirs, Cane Seat Settees, Lounger, Stooh., &c., manufactured at . WILLIAM SHAFFER'S Philadelphia Fancy Chair Fattoiy. INo. (X North nth Street. above Arch. IN B.—Dealers In want of Chaim wit! he Nupplied on the 1110Rirendonahle termc: 'Oct 2, 1552. - - ' '40.3f ---s. - • TRAY COW.4-Sitased from the substribrr on the 10th of September, a white and - red Cow, with red head and neck, with •+, Wan and hell, with the letters J. r. sewed 11l On the Strap. %Vhnever will return said • 'OW' lirl, or give any Information wltereshe may be found, t JACOB FRANCE, let. Clair, Schuylkill County, will be mtitably rewarded. lOst. 2,1552. 40-2 t• ./. ---- TRAY COW.—Sinised away frnm the lab. 1. i.criber. resulinu in Cumbola, Sclutylkill County. arut two weeks ago. a Yellow-colored ` % uley Ccok, with white face, arid dar brown emits around the eyes, and had , A r a large Bell attached to her neck with a Chain. Whoever will return said Cow to the subscri ber, or give him information where ho can gel her again, will be reasonably rewarded. . -% V 11,1.1 A NI ARMSTRONG. Oct. 2,11452. 40-11' . I ~, O. Jaudon DEM ~TRAY NUE E Pa—C3Oli! to the prettifies of . the )putocritorr, on the 10th of Atignst, iesiding in hai -1 / township, nes r TaylOtsvite, 4 sheep. The owner A rennested to tome, forward, prove properly.' P 3 O r I :trees. and take i hear away. otherwlie they wilt hu sold areordine to law. JONATHAN VARNALL. Fr to. 14, 18.52.':19-31* CI TRAY COW.—Caiiiii" to the premises of the i...7subscribet, residing in Norwegian Tn.. .i, : ., s adjoining the Borough of Prattville, a red ' I ' Cow, with short ilorns,while on the belly, ' %se 4 ryd short tail. The owner la requested 10 ..- 'iol come forward. prove property, pay rharge.i an take her away. othertviae the will be told arctuding to{ law. cruAnLEs nefia. Aug. 213,1K2. . . I .., . . . - 'NOTICE Is hereby given that the above C aw w it ! 14 sold on the !fah day of ()ember, 1852, to defray the etpenses of keeping her, at directed by law. .• _., eIIA4ES REAL iFtept 20-3 t i---- ASULAM.) lIOVSE, ARCII St.;above SEV ENV] St., Philadelphia. This new and elrennt Itotel is now open for the reception =';',." o visitors. Its location! Is central. and In 9;',.. . the immediate nciehbOthood of plates of ttinusement. It rontainn a number of stbala 0 ° 66 nirniehed ilia degree of elegance and comfort weir equalled. paths, hot .ind cold water. at :''conneeteil Will, the estabhshthent. The Proptleiresa sollrits the patronage of lier friends and the public, assorting them that no pains wilt he grated to render satisfac tion. MRS. MARY WEAVER. • Late' Penn'a. Nall, Pottsv Me. Pa. I li. P. Ilanurn, Pupettntendant. Sept. 1.5, 1e52. , 311-it -1 0UNTAIN SPRING lIOTEL.—P! UR. dersighed reepectOilly announces to his Mewl; ad , the, public in general, that he hag leaseil Ibe POW:TAM elPßlflif7 HOTEL, formerly f .. tit by.lllre El. Ileieel , where he will he j - ii, e 411 to accommodate all that may patronize ~., him. 111,1 table will 'he provided with the best the market affords. Ills Bar lo equal to any is thr country. ; 11113 Atabfing iq anfacient to entertain any ananiilf of stock. • The linger has been milted with alsrg . " 3 milted rotnancolloud Rail Room at tattled. which will alwaY 4— h e open Rif those that wilt-favor him with their Co- Inin PRAM SEITZIMZER+ stept.-4, 1652. ''. 3d•tf ..,.._......._---------• ALT:: SALT t! SALT LI l'.:1,000 'Sack: playerpord Vrenntl, (or Ground Mom) 10 0 daAsh - On's one, w.ono bushels Tnik'd Island; 114,10 , 14 and 0 lbs. Da iry Bat', Constantly on hand and for ale ,i 1 1 ,,, in lots an snit pUtChlperg. by ' ALEX" CIDER HERR. 'lmpanel and -Dealer in salt, No. ad riouth Wharves, Philadelphia: so.am 4 - 4B Inv& MEM Sept. Is, 1352 --- - - IIIII..ADIMPIIIAF EGHG WOLESALE PIIICES oS„ Sept. 27.1f3 7 • EGGS, Iny Cents tier doton—Prospeets coed • ROLL BUTTEIL US to ICI cents twt pound-1 00 J - Corrected weekly by C. ROAENRERRY & holeettlo Grocers a* Produro Dealer*, No. 196 it SECOND street. Phi „cadvipttia to ne, wil N. U.—Merchints w rend their 'Eggs ive quick and. gem returns.' All enquiries b 1 all urotberwlse Will be penctnally C. K. e k,. answred by 'S • C, 1114iin May 12085% G. lk Ge Th ISEI Non cola ech( MI
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers