rotiled t« sny .i -J.s,c>;r;p! jr." cv/n, jjtotirt jtidiced in favor or any nation but my dv n, ex iept their conduct th-iiu'iuls tiiafprAMcdUoii. A greater rtTangi? firirrc» *vfr pa 111-11, than that lately by flic Fnriich nation. I mi: v iciti .i is m»y change rrqn'- ,C?K.'r c and a thou land pa!T» i: s whicii attack-thprj.:n —-tni: is not material, but, «-J»cn we fife a gr£at and powerful nation ct^nfing,—changing from that glow of enthulTalm jvhich has |<>ng been borne in the bosoms of A.-nvicati", \cft2t does it e viitce I It is a jVrelurat.tive evideiue that fojne great.ever.t hi; cauieti it. 1 corae forward with ii» atiaebmrm'-but to iAy own gov.ernustn:, 1 think none so good: I u .11 lay that America, every thing in bsr, arid belonging io'hcr'in tv- 1 ery relpcit, is. superior to any thiirgin any oth er co(ja:iy. This may L. thotight a narrow difpeiition, but lam not lure tßat tfc. he more liberal would 6c to lie more politically wife- I tl : n conie forward, not to vindica-e the cause of France or Cueat Britain, nor to depreciate the cue in vioJatjnp; the: dignities of the mner, but only to vindicate ottr own government be cause I think it right .' It f:ems cnri (•us toohferve that, uhile all nations are' ein- J ployed in the admiration of, our cOhfiitutioil, cur government and administration ; our own cUircns are the only ones, who expeefs diflatis iailion at its form or itrcontjudl. I do not mean to fay that all that his been done on the part of the government has heen critically right, J wdl not deny but it may have omitted to'do whit it ought to have dorie, or done in some cases what had teen "better let' alone, —but by the great mils of. their tranfaitions they have afTumed a fifuatitfn as '<ifpe£Uble as that of any other nation. '3'hv fiery ordeal we had to pais through amkjQ cmifii&jng nations has heen as fuccefsfully encountered by the conduit we piir l'ued as by any other path we could have chosen. I cannot pretend to defend the violations com mitted by cither of the bulligerent powers—they have both afted wrong ; so much so as to im press the whole work! that we cannot depend upon the '\generofity," or " magnanimity" cf either, but the queition is, have we 'fuffi cient caufeto resent these insults i we all agree that an attempt no negotiate will mi ft fafely conduit us out of our present difa«ulties ) —we agree as to the object. but the manner to effect that objeft, with honour to our nation is the point oh which we are divided •• an amicable adjuftinent of our differences then I take to be the unanimous wilh, but Upon what terms ? On 1 a former occaSon it will be lecolle&ed that we | adjusted a dispute with Great Britain by a trea- I ty. An adjustment not inconsistent with the i lioiiour, advantage, or jaftice of the nation, \ but confifleut with all. Tjik treaty received its i proper ratification by every branch vf the go-! Vernment, and I believe is become generally popular—however, if it might have not met j tl;e acquiefccnce, .it his the compliance of every 1 one ; notwithstanding what some gentlemen would fay upon the fubjeit, I cannot believe b'jf, had not the prejudice against the British j nation been so prevalent, that treaty would I have been fatisfaflory to all; but notwithstand ing thai, we have done it to our fatisfaflion, ( I | mean by a great majority of the citizens) al- ' though it might not be so in the fight of France. ! She fays by that ail we have violated our an- I tecedent treaty with her. Now the ijueftiou with us is whether this aflertion has foundation or not: I mull fay I believe not. It was not,a ! treaty ofFenhve and defenfive we made with her, nor to continue f®r ever ; this she well knew, else why did (he not come forward and 1 fay to us, you are under obligation to join us ; against our enemies I No, they kr.ew the con- ! tvarv, and the.---fore could not exa<9 it. We* are ready to prove that nore of tie articles of the British treaty does in the least contravene that with France. , [To be continued.] THURSDAY, JUNE 8. The bill for preventing the exportation of arms and ammunition was read the third time j —when, Mr. Lyon said, except the word cannons 1 were (truck out of it, he could *ot consent to vote for the passing of the bill! Mjc.W. Smith called for the yeas and nays upon the paffmg of this bill, which were accordingly taken, and were 79 in favor of it, and 8 against it. The nays were Messrs. Elmendorff, Findley, Locke, Ly on, Macon, M'Clenachen, Nicholas, and Venable. Mr. W. Smith, from the committee to whom was referred the bill for preventing the fitting of privateers, made a report, which recommended an agreement to alt the amendments of the committee of the whole, except one for prohibiting citizens from taking command or entering on board of any vessel with intent to cruise against vessels of the United States, instead of which they recommended another to be enadted in a se parate law, confining this bill entirely to private vefll'ls. The House went into a committee of the whole on this report, agreed to it, and after wards took it up and agreed to it in the House, and the bill was ordered to be en gvoffed for a third reading. Mr. W. Smith moved that a comnlittee be appointed to prepare and report a bill to prohibit citizens of the United States from taking the command of or entering on board any (hip at' of any foreign power. A Committee of three was accordingly ap pointed. Mr. CoiT heljeved that some inconveni ences arose from vessels which had been taken prizes' from citizens of the United States, being again fold to citizens of this.country, atid from their obtaining frelh registers for them, as the doing of it appeared to be an additional inducement to captures. Pie therefore proposed a resolution to appoint a coromjticc to conftder the propriety of pro hibiting tlie pra&ice, in future, which was agreed to, and a committee of three ap pointed. Mrt W, St*ith moved that the House take Hp the bjll which was under considera tion yeftcrday,-when an adjournment took jjlftrt, viz. the bill for raising additional carps of artilufifts and engineers ; when Mr. Macon said he (hould not renew this motion for rejecting t!< : bill, as it might c«i£ume mora time than letting it take its regular covirfe.; but he did not think he '.hewed any want ofcaiuior in wifliing to get rid os-it iri that.way. The- gentleman from South-Carolina talked as much about can dor, aad Ibewed aa Ft(tie of it as man ill that Honfe- The bill was referred to a com tn?tl *e cf the v.'hclc, to-morrow. Mr. L tvjNdfiTOhi said, that it was well known that the qoinmilTipnerg for fettling the British dells were now orgawzed and vjr.dy to proceed U tiaSr.cfe. It had been 1 fuggefied that great evijs might grife fur ' want of an agent to *hcc':..tbe. claims of the i Britifti ; lie (liould tlK'jrefore propose that such ah agent be appointed. He laid a re fohltion upon the "table, direfting that pro riljon be made bylaw for enabling the Ex ecutive to appoint an agent for this purpofi. The house again rcfo'.vcd itCelf into a com ttiittef Of tbC whole on the (late of the union, and the fifth refokrtion. viz. that refpedting the arming of merchants vessels, with the amendments which had been yesterday of fered, being under configuration. Mr. Otis said it ought to be considered that they were not about to giant a privi lege to our vessels to arm in their own de fence, but to modify that right, He tho't all difcuflions on the law of nations were secondary ; for j if our own law did no.t for bid the practice, it was neceflary something (hould be done to regulate it," and when the bill was brought in, gentlemen might direst tKeir objections to such parts of it as they thought proper; There could be no doubt that the law of nations warranted the prac tice ; but it might.be our policy to put it under a stricter control than other nations had done, because all other commercial na tions had fleets to protect their commerce. He spoke of the difference of carrying arms on board a vessel and using them. Mr. O. referred to a provision in the law of nations, which, if it did not positively acknowledge the right of merchants vessels of neutral nations to be armed, at least im plied it. It was, that vessels of war have a right to examine merchants vessels, and rf they make any resistance, they (hall be con sidered as lawful prize, which he said sup posed them to be in a capacity to fight. It was acknowledged that this power might be abused, and therefore it was that he propo sed to reftrift it in the mqft effeftual manner. At preferlt there was nothing to prevent the owner of any veflel from arming it, from which great disorder might ensue, but the or der of the Executive, which might be any day revoked.; butthefe regulations were in tended scrupulously to avoid cause of offence to any nation, and the improper conduct of | the captain of any vessel would be disavow- ■ ed. The only question was, which was the best Way of doing this. All were agreed ' that the regulatibn would be proper to the i East Indies and the Mediterranean, but there seemed some doubt as to the propriety of including the Weft Indies. Mr. Otis contended, that if the danger in the Weft India seas was as great from un authorised cruisers as it were in the East In dia or Mediterranean seas (and he thought this had clearly appeared) the fame regula tion ought to be extended to that quarter. But it was said it might be the cause of war. He took it for granted such reftridtions would be made in the law as would prevent any real pretext for war, and if the French were determined to aft upon fpec'wus ones, they would not want them ; and if they had them not, they would manufacture them, and nothing that we could do would prevent them from making war upon us. Mr. Otis denied that resentment could have all the effe£t afcribedtoit, since it would only operate to any effeft upon a few indi viduals ; nor did he think the captains em ployed in the Weft India service would be less likely to consult the interests of their em ployers and of their country, than those em ployed in the East-India and Mediterranean trade. He denied also that if a captain was so imprudent as to force a vessel into a re bel port that it would be a cause of war, nor would the French Republic ever make it a pretext of offence. Indeed, if it were a fa£t that the unauthorized cruizers in the Weft Indies were in rebellion to the French gov ernment, we (hould, in fact be fighting their battles by fitting out vessels to oppose their unjuftifiable attacks. The gentleman from New-York had ob jefted to this proposition, because it appear ed naked. He thought this no objection, because the gentleman could take it out in to the committee room and clothe it with his own ideas. The gentleman from Penn sylvania had said the expence would be an objedtion ; but he might have known, that no one would be forced into the regulation. But it was said the merchants were against arming their vessels. They were apt, he said, to suppose,' that because half a dozen persons with whom they conversed were of their opinion, that every body thought a like. But suppose this was the opinion of some merchants, did not they expeft there would be other measures taken for the protedtion of our trade. In order to put the matter upon a right footing, gentlemen should fay to the merchants, " We will do nothing ; we are willing that privateers (hould not on ly come off your Capes, but up to your ci ty, and take your banks ; (he did not know whether there would be any one found to Welcome them) we want to go home ; the weather getting warm, our own affairs have r.eed of our attention." . But, added Mr. O. if the merchants are averse to this pro position, why do they not meet and declare their opinions. If they were to do this, it would have some weight with him. Another gentleman had told them, that the loss sustained by depredations upon our commerce did not fall wholly upon our merchants, but upon the public at large. That the gentlemen from Pennsylvania (hould have fupporteia theoretical idea of this fort, would not have surprised liinf; but that a gentleman, who was himfelf a mer chant, lhould have given countenance to it, was extraordinary. If the merchants and insurers were to lose the whole of their capi tals .by these fpoliatfons, would it be any fatisfadtion to them to be told, that the far mers would also be affedted by their losses ? Or, if the matter was reversed, and a mil dew ijiould destroy the crops of a number of farmers, the iniafoitunc wcftild of'courfe raise the price of grain, and the public would be affedted by the misfortune, yet the advance in price would be general, and | the (jifrerirg would not be confined to those 1 whofV cropi bad been deftroycd. Seeing then,faidMr. O.thatatircojEmcrce is thus exposed, fliall we defiil from all pru dcntrncafures* of prote&iilg'it ? Ifwedo,wc fnalf be obliged to resort to the mortifying alternative of putting our vessels undci'Bri l'tjh convoys, or fuffer them to be captured ; and he believed if nothing was done- for the protection of cur trade, it would be foand at the nekt feflion.of Cortgrefs, that all jhe vefTels which had arrived fafe, would liave been thus convoyed. Mr. Otis concluded by A complaint at the want of candor in charging gentlemen who advocated this motion, with being ad vocates of war ; he thought gentlemen had used language in the course of the debate, that they Would not have used out 'cf dcOrS. He feared the time was coming wTien they should be obliged to unite in the defence of their common country, and he ithougbt it would b; well to avoid all unreiuViable pro vocation. But if gentlemen were determin ed to fay, because he advocated the arming of our merchants' veflels, that he advocated a war proportion, and that it wo aid pro duce war in fix months, he could not help it. The public must judge betwixt them. Mr. Varnum said the gentleman laftup had taken much pains to P.iew that the citi zens of the United States had a right to arm their vessels, and to refill the attacks of fo reign nations. If this were true, he was as tonished the doftrine should have lain so long dormant. But he believed right had not been considered to exist, and he believed it ought not to exist. Tho' the President had forbidden the arming of merchants veflels, yet gentlemen aflerted they had a right to doit. (Mr. Otis interrupted Mr. V. to read an extract from the President's speech on the fubjetl, -where he fays he did not doubt the policy andproppety of merchant's arming thcirveffels. Mr. V. said the Pre sident might not doubt the policy and pro priety, and yet not be fatisiied as to the le gality of the meafnre. If individuals had this right, he hoped they should pass a law before they rose to prevent its exercise ; as he doubted not if this plan was gone into, that this country would soon be involved in the horrors of war. Mr. V. wilhed to know what cause ex isted at present more than for four years past for going into this measure. Gentlemen had brought forward many ideal depredati ons committed by the French Republic, of which no evidence had been attempted to be adduced. They had proof indeed of three or four veflels being taken into Francein the report of Major Mountflorence, yet gentle men exclaimed that our commerce was laid at the feet of France. If this were so, why did not the evidence lie before them ? The cries of women and children which had been the other day introduced, was not proof. He believed those cries had been produced by an overbearing spirit of speculation, in this country, more than by the depredations of any nation whatever. He saw nothing in the French Republic like a wish to injure the property of the citizens of the United States. Mr. V. then took notice of the de cree which they had pafled in refpedt to the British, and doubted not, when our ne gociators should fettle t'natbufinefs, that the present misunderstanding would be done a way, and they would be convinced of our good wishes towards them. He did not wonderthat the French should have been of fended with this country ; he thought they had cause for offenee in the British treaty ; nor was he of opinion that our conduit tow ards them had been more friendly than to o ther nations, which he thought they had some reason to expeit ; not but that he ap plauded our executive in taking such a part as was calculated to keep us out of the war. He believed it would have been a wife tiling j not to have entered into any treaty with ei ! thcr nation till the conclusion of the war.— (The chairman reminded Mr. V. of the | question.) He concluded with hoping we j should wait the event of negotiation, with- I out doing any thing which might eventually lead to a war. Mr." Nicholas would not again have troubled the Committee had not the impor tance of the question appeared to him to re quire it. They were told that merchants had a right -to arm their veflels, and a mo tion was made to fanftion the arming of them to the Weft Indies, in addition to the East Indies and the Mediterranean, under certain reftriftions. So that they were a bout to admit the right of the merchants to do the thing. It was neceflary therefore, to enquire whether this was the praflice of nations. It was said there was no law to prevent arming, yet the President had forbidden the arming of merchant's veflels, except in cer tain cases, and he flioidd not be willing to believe that he would do what he had no right to do. And surely no gentleman would contend , that the President had the power to do, or not to do, according to his will. It was his bulinefs to execute the law, and not to make it. He believed there had been no hffitation, since the pafling of the law in 1794, in believing that veflels arming in the ports of the United States, were do ing so with an intent to commit hostility. To suppose the contrary, would be to bring the Executive into a lituation which he did not deserve. The gentlemen declared it was their in te'ntion to suppress a natural right. He would not willingly dispute their intention, but he believed this was not the whole-os it, because the gentleman from S. Carolina had ' spoke of forcing our veflels into the rebel ports of the Weft Indies, than which no step could be taken which would sooner lead to war. But gentlemen said that the law of nations countenanced this doctrine, and ■said it remained with them who opposed it to prove the contrary. The fact wire—the law of nations was silent upoo this point. But, if it h;d been a beneficial thing, and conducivethe happiness of a country, *rorcld'it not have been at some time aited upon, and noticed by the writers or. the law of intions ? Arid is not tlieir silence, nret ty lirong evidence that the right was never exerciTcd ? The reason of the cafe was ftrong.agisaft the praftfee ; aj, if unreftrain ed> it wa3 acknowledged it would lead di rectly to war, as it "Would have a tendeacy to v,okte the rights of. other nation#; and if tl.is would be she natural cmifequcDce of the meafnre unfeftrained; lie believed tie fame effefts would be produced, and not-, with (landing aav restraints which raigiit be enafktl to regulate "the practice: And if they, authorized a pratlice which, produced an evi|, it would be the fame as if they au thorized the evil. - But gentlemen fay this measure could give the French no real offence, and if they would act from specious ones, they would never be in want of them. Mr. N. said he did not want to remove specious pretences of offence,^and if this country gave no solid ones, he should never be heard to raise his voice in favour of France. But it was his opinion this proportion was pregnant with real offence. The gentleman last up seemed to think, that if the merchants were indisposed to the measure, that it would not b< carried into efle&, and of course could do no harm ; but tho' the generality of merchants might be opposed to it, yet there may be enough rea dy to enter into it, to involve the country m mifchief. For, they could not fay, thus far it shall go, and no farther, nor would any bond which could not be entered into be an efiedtual security for our peace. He was surprized to hear the complaints of the gentleman just fat down with refpeft to attributing improper motives to gentle men ; since he believed that gentleman had j himfelf been as reprehensible in this refpedt ' as any other. Indeed, this very day, he had spoke of the French coming up to our wharves, and intimated certain perforis would be ready to receive them. He th'o't the admonition came illy from one who had been twice obliged to recant what he had. said in this way. Mr. N. concluded with hoping the a mendment would be rejected ; nor did he wish the resolution to be agreed to without it, since he believed if it pafled that House, it would not pass the Senate, and if any law pasted on the subject, he wished it to be so exprcfled as to do away the fuppdfition that the right in merchants to arm was acknow ledged. Mr. Swanwick next spoke against the motion ; he was followed by Mr. Harper, on the other fide. Meflrs. Brooks, W. Smith and Williams also supported the a mendment ; and Meflrs. S. Smith, Giles, Gallatin and Macon opposed it. The ques tion was then taken on inferring the JVeJI Indies and negatived, there being 35 votes in favour of it, and against it 46. A mo tion was then made by Mr. Harper, for the Committee to rife, which was negatived— there being only 32 votes in favour of it. The question was tHbn taken on the firft a mendment to insert Eajl Indies and the Me diterranean, and negatived, there being 41 for it and 40 against it. The Chairman de claring it to be negatived. The question was about to be taken on the resolution as amended, when Mr. Day ton said he had an amendment to introduce ; but as it was then past four oclock he should move that the Committee rife. He would just fay that his amendment was intended to change the principle of the resolution alto gether : It was to strike out reJlriS'tng, and to insert " authorizing under certain regula tion:." He could by 110 means agree to give his countenance to a resolution that should convey an idea that the merchants had a right to arm their veflels, without the previous consent of the legislature. The Committee rose, and the House ad journed. By this day's Mail. NORFOLK, June 1. Yellerday arrived heie the Danish brig Neutrality, from Bilboa, which fhc left the 14th April. In lat. 38, and long. ofMa deira, on the 20th of April, spoke a British privateer of 14 gun?, out fx days fromLifbon, who informed that the Spanifn fleet had gone into Cadiz ; and that the Engllfh fleet under Admiral Jervis (reinforced>lo 22 fail of the line) were cruizing off lhat harbour. Three 74s and several frigates .had gone home with the Admiral's prizes. 3 t. FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVE By the mod accurate account, that we have been able to procure, of the (lateof of the votes in the Eafiern Diftri£l ? of the choice of Federal Representatives, it appears that the whole number is about 2850, of which Mr. Parker has about 1550 being 300 more than Mr. Dearborn. PITTSBURGH, June 3. Extract of a letter fiom a gentleman in Meadwdle, on French creek, ta his friend in this town dated May 36, 1797. " This day a violent florm of wind, hail and rain in a foiith weft dire&ion took thfs place, and has unroofed most of the houses in it— your house info much injuied that I fear it will have to be taken dpwn—nearly one half of Wahab'i hotjfe is blown, dovvu—a son of Mr, Dunes, was killed by the fall of a rafter how far it has extended I cannot yet learn. GAZET7E MARINij LIST. Tout of Philadelphia. ARRIVED. DAYS. Bffg Harmony, Norris, Gonaives 17 Schr. Jupiter, Burbazjk, New York . Polly, Gaicfii er, RirhtnebH ' 1 Welch, Carolina g Auvfnture, Howe-, Virginia !v£V7-Y'Jl'K:- T—.c 8. v ; Cap*2i» O.arh]a:e, of the Irirr Trie, '.whioh „*v-$ Kritfieniric : 3; t:. e" K avannah, arr tci jLefon/l: y tLcalovc \\ .c ir: tl clng Flora. H*affair Uai cac.-of il)-: C.ithajcn i fleet (a > lij; 1 peji before he tailed, with 1 ' the news that slit ft linns were tal.cn r an tv ; o <?c-:kT and » ; th*) hcv:fir on heard two millions of Dollar", befi !ca o:her v&lustle property. /♦ full and fatufa<Slory. confirm rticn of th* abovf i* also received by'Cipt. White, cfthe Suffolk, whoj in-thc latrof \Xt -bcttfetn tko Florida and the B*nk&J fe'.l in .\ifth.ihrro Spanilh frigate*, 3rd a-lour gun .vvhohad Lccn sent out for the jurpofe o£ picking up the scattering vcffelsof tiie convey \ asthfr English not bf j »ng able to n>an th? whole has ft ripped fntfral of thefhips of ..-their valuables, and then let thorn go. I hi? t# •.rparn White by the conjinfidore. ; £>)'r jLd this fail'of convinc ing arty one, if «fHH fnf'her cc~; Capt. Church of his M }?jlyls Topaz, -who, on flie 2ci infb boarded Capr. White, ?n,d rgfrt; him* ilmi,'ar information to rhe above. The number of taken, was fupfcokd to be about i£ fa J. C -tj;. on his ctlrward heund paftig?* was pfEP iat a n 'd shot at by fever.tl French picaroon* .but the weight of his metal k-pt them at a BAf * dilUnce. ARRIVED. * Ship Suffolk; White, Jamaica i 3 Brig Flora, Bower®, Havannah *8 PoJIy, Builock, 'Savannah 7 . Schr. Sally, Thurfton, Jamaica Antelope, Ch'advviclc, Norfolk 10 Sloop Virginia, Sogang, Norfolk 3 CLEARED, Ship Etlice, Hervpy, London Brig Gco*£c, Tai/, Port de Paix Schr.-Sally, Gs:r, - St. Augwftir.o The Brigantine Portland, capt. Marr, is fate arrive 1 at Kingftort Jamaica frort Halifax. BOSTON, Sunday June 4. Arrived fchooncr Spec hvcll, Capt Butler , $j days from Cadiz. The following lill of Amcr.c-ti veifcls, captured by ohe French and Spanish priva teers en the coast of Spain, is received a merican Con£ul,at Cadiz, v 7. Ciifriedinto Cadiz, brig Elizabeth, Gardner, of Philadelphia ; fl>'p Mary Ann Smith, ot do.Po facre br<g Independent, Kobertlon of do brig Geo'ge, Rust, oi Carried into Alg ziras, fljip Albemarle, Lang,of Newyork; brig Difcatch, Brown, of Plulr»delph: i Ihip Columbus', Crothiric,. of .Dartmouth ; fliip Pomona, Grout of Boston ; Snow Mary, Bum* ham of do. Carried into Ccuta, Brig Minerva, Bray of Philadelphia ; fthr. Speedwell, Stor< y r ol soll«>nj fchrs. Rebecca,Mone ; Minerva, Williams, Mar tin, R«ger*of Cape Ann. BALTIMORE June 6- TJie (l ip Sidney of thia port, capt. Jamei Parker, from Surinam tp Baltimore, was cap tured on the I 2th April by a British priva teer, the Portland of Antigua, ind finttoSt. Kitts, where the captain wrn reftifed peimif fion to go on (hore—cxpefted her to t>c libel led the'nsxt day. THIS DAY IS VUBLJSHJiU, (Neatly bound and lettered, price 2 dols. 15 cte.) Bv G. DECOMBAZ, BOOKSELLER C? STATIONER, No, 48, North Third Street, Ihe Adventures of Telemachus. French and Enfrfifti, 1 vols, iiino. AMONG the books which daily fall wto'th* hands of the yeuth of both fexee, none have a higher claim to their attention than Tele machus. she miit interesting lesions are here 1 conveyed in the vehicle of an interesting Poem, replete with the finefl touches of the true pa thttic, and embellfhcd with all the graces of a beautiful style. The fatal effefls of indulging the paflions are exemplified in the rr.oft {lnking manner j and the liappinefs attending inno cence and virtue painted in the lirelieft colours. Whatever can incite to virtue or deter from vice i whatever can enlighten the undedUnd ing, charm the imagination, and improve the heart, is to be found in this intereftine wrrk THE NAVAL GAZETTEER; Being a complete Geographical Di<ftionary» containing a full and accurate account, aipha beticaily arranged, of all the countries and ill ands in the known world ; ftcy.'ir.g their lati tude, foundings, and stations for anchorage j with a particular description of the fever a I Bays, Capes, Channels, Coves, Creeks, Currents, Guifs, Harbours, Havens, Lakes, Oceans, Ra ces, Kivers, lioada, Hocks, Sands, Shoah, Sounds, Straits, Tides, Variation of the Com pass &c. Together with a particular relation of the shape and appearance at Jea, of the l'evs ral Headlands, Whmufes, Peninsulas, Points, Frorrontories, and whatever is ofufe or impor tance to the Mailer, Pi!ot, Comitiand-r, or Seaman cf any fljip or VfCtl, in navigating the watery element. Afo Comprehending Ampla Direilicfis for tailing into or out of the different Ports, Strait?, and Harbours of the four quarters of the world ; and for avoiding dangers on the varinus ahd extended coa'is ; in which more than twelvethoufand diilrin<fl names of places, are treated »f and explained. With a correcT set of Chart", t vols. Bvo. price 6 dols. By the Uev. JOHN MALHAM, 0- This has been pronounced ilie mod ufe ful and the cheapen bookpubliflied in America. June 9. dtf. Window Glass, Of Superior Quality, end cheaper than any other in the Citv— OF VAKIOm SIZES, Ftom 8 by 6 to 19 by 14J By the (ingle Box or QOanii-y, may be had at the S ore of the Sublciibers, comer of Arch and Front llrect. 'James C. & Samuel W, F'Jher. Philadelphia, Lailson's CIR.CUS, South Fifth-Street \ 1 To-Morkow Evening, June 10, WILL BE HFRFORMHI), Various Equestrian Exercises, And, oil>er STAGE ENTERTAINMENTS— Cd" Particulars-ill the bills of the day. A Cony Stolen ROM the owner at the corner of Nintn and Arch ilreets. She is a deep red" brindle with fonie white, about ten years old and very gentle. The.person who Se cretes her hid belt turn her out, as, iflegal evidence can be obtained, he may expedLa rigdroui prosecution. TWO DOLLARS rc ,<rard will be given to any person who wiil deliver the Gow, or give such evidence a gainst the peffon keeping her, that he may be convicted of the fa&. Apply at No. 218, Akch SniKT. Jut?e 9. tawyjr tor St. inom-ds, <a THE Ann and Mary, Captain Baits ; WILL fall id ten days. For fireiirlu or reffase appVy. to ' T, COPPINGER. No. 221, South Front Jlrtet. June o. diet June 9.
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers