%f)t ttte. PHILADELPHIA, ITEDKESDAX EVENING, JUNE 7. .'..1. ■ 1 i. ».i 1 .. 1 John Stickney Merchant of Worcester, (M chufete) has invented an Arch Bridge, for which he has received a Patent from the Government of the United State's. ,'1 be improvements made in tl-.is conftrttftion . »t« in the firft inftancr, a fivfng of one third the rv.aatut of Timber commorly used in ftrticlures tit this kind, but a f na-11 quantity of Iron will be VAUifetf. The timber bring very compad will not only add to the beiiU - y, lint greatly to the Prenjtb of the arch. The distance to Which it may be carried is indeterminate, as it may with ease and fifcty be extended from one hundred to right hundred feet. Tho lcngttvof the largeit (tides required would be only shirty two feet lor an Arch of any length, 1 and in th« manner they ■ iro united, no part cm ever get afurtder .until taken apart by the workmen,th«y may with eafeac any tim« take rut any one or more (ticks, and 1 replace thcin wi houtany detriment to the ftanj ingpart; therefore a bridge of thi< kind might at Vciy small eipcnce be kept in repair for ag^s. It is well known that Arch Bridges are extreme ly besefioial. At the common accidents which throw down pile bridge', such as torrents of flood*, loads of lee, or floating timbers, which beat with irrefiftable viclen e against the piers, will have no power over a fabric of this kind. No bridge u more beautiful than one of a (ingle arch, nor any more conveuieut and firm than these when properly conftruited, nor more agreeable to yafs over when the afrettt is very gradual, and no ma(Ty timbers over head to impede the profpe«2. Sefides the nametous advantages of this new conftrnction, from the ease and fafety in which they can be repaired there refulis a promise of their be ■ Ing of great utility to the Country. The following is the article of our treaty with Sweden, produced and read by Mr. W. Smith on Monday. "If in any future war at ft-a, the contracting power« resolve to remain neuter, and, as such, to observe the (tri<9eft neutrality, then it is agreed, that if the njerchant (hips of either party (hould happen to be in a part of the fca, where the (hips of war of the fame nation are not ltationed, or if they are met on the high sea, without being able to have reeourfeto their own convoys, in that ease the commrnder of the (hips of war of the other party, if required, (hall in good faith andfinceti ty give them all necessary afliftance, and, in such ease, the (hips of war and frigates of either of the powers, (ball protedt and support the merchant (hips of the other, provided nevertheltfs that the (hips claiming afliftance are not engaged in any illicit ccftimerce contrary to the principles ef neu trality." Mr. W Smith, in the debate on Monday, de nied the assertion of Mr. Giles, that Franc# had declared certain British pouts in the Weft-Indie» to be inaftate of rexbllion ; it was Victor MugOes whb had issued the declaration, Mr. Smith did not fitppofe the government of France could hazard fnch a ridiculous dodrine. The .following is a corred Copy of the Re - solutions of Mr. W. Smith, depending in the House of Representatives : 1.. Refilved, —That further proviljon oijght to be made by law,' for'fortifying the ports and harbours of the United States. 2. Resolved —That further provision be made by law, fpr completing and manning the /rigateti United States, Conjlitution and Cancellation. 3. Refolded —That provision be made by law, for procuring by purchase, a further naval force, to conftft of frigates, of guns, and Hoops of war, of guns. 4. Resolved—Thai provision be made by law, sos empowering the President to em ploy the naval force of the United States, a3 convoys, to protest the trade thereof. J. Resolved —That provision be made by law, for regulating the arming of the mer chants veflels, of the United States. 6. Resolved —That the existing Military establishment ought to be augmented by an addition of one regiment or corps of attil lerifts and engineers, and companies of dragoons. 7. Resolved —-That provision be made by law, for empowering the President to raise a provjjional army, to corifift of regi ments of infantry, one regiment of artillery, and one regiment of dragoons, by commis sioning the officers, and by volunteers or en liiltnents, whenever the circumstances of the country (hall, ill his opinion, render the laid army necessary for the protection and de fence of the United States : Provided, that neither the officers or soldiers (hall receive any pay or emoluments until called into ac tual service. 8. Resolved —That provision be made by law, to authorize the President to borrow, on the credit of the United States, a sum not exceeding dollars, to defray the expence which may arise in proyiding for the defence and security of the United States. 9. Resolved —That provision be made by law, to raise a revenue adequate to the reim bursement, within years, of such sum as may be borrowed, as aforefaid. 10.-Resolved —That provision be made by law, to prohibit, for a limited time, the exportation of arms, ammunition, and mili tary and naval stores. Those Printers who have published the Resolves in an incorreft (hape, are reqUclted to publish the above. FROM THE AURORA. Philadelphia, May 31, 1797. felirvj Gtizcns, THE charge of Judge Iredell to the jury it Richmond, and tbe consequent prefrntuient of tayfelf and others—l have lately read with every ftntiment of indignation which could be inspired in the bosom us a free man: If my countrymen do i:ot feci ihc fame refentmmt it must be because they live forgotten those fenti /-ments so favourable to ttt •"rcedom of opinion which a few years ago we fought and bled fur. The judiciary tnftitutions of the United Sfatr» are valuable only ai they tend to preserve the piblie pcate and iadividualrigbta, by a regular andjult execution of the laws :—lf no law has been violated, there can be no business for th( federal judiciary, and it is jis yet a feature o: liberty «tenjoy, that no law has anad* it cut pablc to entertain oi'to express our opinions ei ther in mattcr»|c.f rePjicn pr pclitics ; It l.as, Lowcver, keen a regular practice cf the t'cJtial juries, lo politic*! dlfcotirfesto th; gran.! juror* throujjuout tht United Stares : They hove become a band of political preachers, iti (tcad ofa fags body to.ailminiller the law The/ do not complain at violations of, any law and point out the true courts: of redref», hut tbry complain of opinions whkti they seem to think tend to defeat their system of polities ; the next thin# T fappofe will be, their system of religion. They Item to be making use of their power and influence both personally 3nd officially to controf the freedom of individual opinion, and these tilings excite a fu4fi«i<» that if they are continued, the time -wiil tome, when men of different political and religious Jentiroents from the judges, will n;t find that e&fy access to jwftice which .those of diflerent opinions may expeift. the impropriety of these kindsof charges to jurors as they are a depai jure from the immediate prov ; nce of the judges— they (hew a political influence ovet the judges by the executive, which is calculated to do irretrievable harm. Judge Iredell's charge at Richmond not only countenances these re marks, but will give rife to the most serious train of reflexions, that can engage tht mind ef any man devoted to the friedfcm of opinion —The jury who adted under this charge, ap pear by their presentment to have considered it , as an authority lor censuring the kidepeiidenct of private opinion. They have pretexted as a real evil the circular letters of several members of Congress, without name, and particularly mine by name, because they differoinatc un funded calumnies against the government, tending to fiparate the people from it, and in creafc or produce a foreign influence. If theft letters contained calumnies that were illegal— if they produced, or increased a foreign influ ence in our country contrary to law, the au thors were fit fubje&s for a presentment and for punilhment. The omission to present the authors as culprits, and confining prefer.tmrnt to the opinions contained in the letters, afford the molt unanswerable proof that these letters were not the evidences of any illegal ?.<sl ; if they were, neither the court or jury seem to have undcrftood the proper manner of doing theirduty ; if they were not they have judici ally animadverted upon the freedom of opinion, with ; view either to suppress it, or to coun terafl its beneficial cffe&s. At a distance from my cpnftituents, charged with their bell inter ests, and bound to give them such information relative to their public concerns, as I peffeffed, I never before knew it was criminal to execute this duty. If I have written fall'ely u i.h a .view to deceive my countrymen, why did not this enlightened jury Hate the fails which I have milVeprelented ? I could then have acquitted myfelt by the proofs I possess ; but when they attack my political opinions, which are but the result of faifts, they do but oppose opinion to opinion. If they can draw better conclusions from all nsceffary evidence relative to the points upon which I have spoken than myfelf, they ' should have presented to you that course of rea soning by which they were fatisfied, and thus by addressing themlelves to your judgments have fatisfied you in opposition to the opinions which I have given j but this would not have anfwereJ' their purpose. They were armed with an awful power, arid a naked presentment mer.t succeeding a political charge from the bench was better calculated to overawe than a manly course of argument. 1 need not fay -to my fellow-citizens, that I love my country and will support itsgovernment, upon the principles of a freeman : —I do not believe any branch of it. administrators is infallible, and whenever they appear to me to incroach on the principles which are necessary to support our freedom and independence, I will continue to ait the part of a watchful centinel at the poll where you have placed me : a charge that I was attempting by my letters to produce, or increase a foreign in fluence definitive of my country's inurcfl, seems to be but the result of an aft too often and too fuccelsfully used by those who are medi tating the objeifl they prafcribe, while by a larms they are diminishing the afleftion of the public towards a mrtfok-they dread, they are but secretly making way for a new attachment towards a nation they love ; and in proportion as they can succeed in the firft view, they are sure in the course of humap events of obtaining their wilhes in the latter view. Look at the names of the grand jury who have made this unexampled presentment although you will find some native Americans who have been attached t© the independence of their country, you will readily perceive what they mean by foreign influense I, like you, my fellow citizens, c.»n have no views of this fort. I have felt, and I Hill do feel, an attachment for the- French na tion : They aflifted my country to eftabliih its independence, and they aided us in securing peace .• They have founded a republic on the overthrow of monarchy and tyranny ; I there fore feel interested in their favour : I look with a friendly eye on their faults, but I admire iheir heroism and military prowess. Still if that na tion or any other on earth, /hall invade the in dependence and freedom of my country, I lhall view the attempt as an independent American It is Britilh influence that we have molt to dread. In proportion as our eommerce and in tercourse with England has become more neces sary to them, by the events in turope, a stron ger desire has been manifested to stop ourin tercourfe with France and engage it in favor of Great Britain. Whenever our commerce has turned in favor cf Fraoce, England has oppres sed it; whenever it has turned in favor of Eng land, France has oppressed it. Our commerce has become a fubjeth of contest between these two nations .• It is injured and oppreft by both. England was appeased for a momsnt by Mr. Jay's treaty •• As a neutral nation we are bound to place France on the fame footing .• But the occasion has offered a favourable oppoitunity to England, to irritate us with France, and France with us, with a view to eftabliih an incurable quarrel, the c'onfequencr of which mult be a compete monopoly of us and our interests by Great Britain.—lr. this view it it that alarms are spread about French influence ; for if a quar rel can be insured between France and Ameri ca, no moral truth can be more true, than this political one, that the United States will be thrown into an alliance offenfive and defenlire with Great Britain. My wilhes and my de terminations have always been to maintain the neutrality of the United States, and regardless of the interest of other nations to keep free from conned! ing our national fortunes with those of any European power.—For tlitfe things and for these endeavours my opinions have been held tip by a grand jury at Richmond as derog atory to the lappinefsand peace of my country : You my fellow citizens will view this attempt to influence opinion with the indignation it de fcrvei, and I promie yon molt Cncerely it fliall not intimidate me from pursuing the fame means of informing you uchith has i icurredtke censure of this politicalcourt and jury. , I am with every feminism of refpeft, ' my Fellow Citizens, your faithful servant, SAM. J. CABELL. The prhiteis tvho are friends to freedom of. op.nion, and efpecialljfuch as may hive publji ei the charge ami presentment alluded to are rf que[tci togiveth-. ainfUf/ace In their papers. CONGRESS. HOUSE or REPRESENTATIVES, Delate on Mr. Kittera'-t Motion. FRIDAY, JUNE 2. A communication was received from the Treasurer of the United States, with his ac counts up to the jift. of March lad, which was ordered tp be printed. The hotife again entered upon the con lideration of the answer to the President's speech ; when the Speaker having Rated the question under discussion at the time the house last adjourned, viz. the previous ques tion upon the motion of Mr. Kittera, for inserting a clause in the address in reference to the spoliations committed upon our fellow citizens. # Mr. J. Williams expressed his concern that this motion had been brought forward at all. In order to extricate the house from the difficulty, he had proposed t» insert the word " justice," which he believed would ' '.ave had the desired effeft. He did not think it was-the business of that house to take into confidergtion the lofTes sustained by our merchants from the spoliations of the French ; if they .chose to run rifles, they mull take the consequences. But the ques tion having been brought before the house, if it were negatived our merchants would have a claim upon government for their loss es. He wilhed,-therefore, to have kept the subject out of fight, since our citizens would not like to be taxed to pay for these spolia tions.' It was the opinion of one part of the house, that tbe propcfition for placing France on an equal footing with other na tions would have the effeft to preserve us in peace ; he wilhed, therefore, that it (hould go out unclogged. He hoped the mover would withdraw his motion ; he thought it would be a conciliatory step, and his propo sition, he was of opinion, would answer ev ery purpose. Mr. Sew all would not have troubled the house on this question, but that part of his constituents being interested in the question, he felt himfelf called upon to make a few remarks upon it. If this motion had not been brought forward, he himfelf (hould have thought it his duty to have introduced something of the fort, since the former a inendment was carried. He did not think with the gentleman last up, that the bare admitting of the question would pledge them to pay for the spoliations. He was of opin- I ion that merchants carrying on trade, under the fanftion of the government, were enti tled to proteftion and to be shielded from insult every where ; but he did not under stand that this proteftion went to the mak ing good of losses, but only to protest them with the public force in their defence. The injuries committed against them might, in •deed, be so great as to be a just cause of war, or of a partial war of retaliation, or for a call upon the nation committing the injury for redress. It had been denied, when the former question was under consideration, that they were dictating any terms to the executive ; it was then said that they were only about to offer him their opinion ; but now, when only a single article was to be added in behalf of our fellow-citizens, it is said to be an ultimatum. This was chang ing of ground; and brought the amendment, which he did not think very hurtful before, to give them the power of making peace or war in the country ; we might force the ex ecutive and Senate into a war against their inclination. The constitution had provided otherwise ; the executive was to take mea sures for preserving peace. This was fuf ficient to (how the absurdity of their under taking the bufinefs.—lf, said Mr. S. .gen tlemen refufe to consider the question, .it will be adding insult to injury upon our fel low citizens. A treaty without this stipu lation would be absurd. Were the Prcfi dent to go on with the idea that that the on ly suggestion in this answer was the ground on which he was to go ? If so, and he were to do any thing more, and war were to be the consequence, he would have to bear the opprobrium. Gentlemen said they had no objection to thus amendment, provided it was not an ultimatum ; h? had no idea that it could be so considered. It was the more hazardous, since (as he before observed) he believed that no steps that they could take would secure peace. With refpeft to the consistency ps members who voted against the former amendment, from constitutional scru ples, voting in favorof this, he always held it good, that when a measure was carried contrary to their wishes, they ought to en deavor, in justice to themselves and their constituents, to prevent the thing from do ing injury as much as possible ; and, upon this ground, he (hould vote for the main question, and against the previous one. Mr. Williams (after leave was obtained to speak a second time to a previous ques tion, which was obtained by every member whofpoke twice on this question) observed that there seemed to be a difficulty in so a - mending the address, as to attend to the claims of their fellow citizens, without ap pearing to impair their desire for peace. In order to promote conciliation in the house, he (hould move tc recommit the address and amendments to the feleft committee who prepared it, apd if he were fuccefsful, he (hould move to add some new members to it.. The motion was put and negatived, there being 0n1)*»24 votes in favor of it. Mr. S. Smith.said that, in the language of Mr. Barras, they presented a novel spec tacle to the world. They had been called together by the President to do.some aft, but they were wafting that time which (hould be employed in ejfeftual measures—how ?- To get clear of what he could not tell how to get dear of, without a recommitment. The objeft of calling congress together was to take into consideration the spoliations committed upon our commerce, and the in dignities (hewn to our. miaifter. They had proofs of the latter faft, but none of the former. He had mentioned this the other day, when the secretary of state was pref ent, expe&ir.g that he would have remedied the deficiency. He would again fay, that when Brililh spoliations was the fubjeft of complaint, they haddosuments before them. At present they had none, for the repre sentations made by Mr. Skipwith long ago, and which were in a train of set dement, could not now be the objeft, but' (omething recent. He wiftred to know whether theif were irregular depredations, or regular'-cap tures. They had-been teld of certain claims of our merchants. He asked w'rat they were. It was true that a number of mer chants.(and he amongst them) hadrcontraft ed with M. Fauchet and others to deliver flour in France, and some of them had got paid and others'not; Many of their vessels hadbeen, it was.true, improperly embargo ed in French ports, for which they had clairr, si payment, whether it would be ob tained or not he knew not. He trusted they were not to go to war to obtain this payment ; he was persuaded that when the treasury of France got into a better state than it was at present that our merchants would be paid ; but if war was to be gone into there would be an end of payment. A mericans,' he said, had been in the habit of trading to what the French called relet ports, in the Weft Indies, and, when the French took our vessels going to those ports, would it be right to go to war to get redress ? No neutral power was permitted to trade with this country when we were declared by Great Britain to be rebels. Vessels taken in going to Briti(h islands, in the Weft Indies, would be looked upon as regular captures, but those captured in going to rebel ports could not be expefted to be compensated for. He knew the French had taken vessels bound to these regular ports ; but he also knew that their numbers were small, and that, instead of twelve millions, it might be found that there had noe been to the amount of half a million, or at mod, taken in this way. And, said he,, (hall we go to war to recover this ? he trusted not, but that the fame course would be followed which had been taken with refpeft to Briti(h spoliations. At that time a negotiator was sent over to Great Britain to fettle the business (and a proper person he was, since it was not always wife in such cases to fend persons who are well known to have a friendly disposition for the nation withwhom they go to treat. ) He wondered the fee. of state (hould have left the gentleman from South Carolina to refer them to Mr. Skipwith's documents. The man who carried on trade from this country with British ports (which was mostly the cafe at Philadelphia and New York) was fubjeft to French spoliations ; he who trad ed to French ports was in like manner fub jeft to the spoliations of the British. Both countries plundered us. (Mr; Harper wi(h ed to have interrupted Mr. Smith ; but Mr. S. would not give way, he said, to a man who had told him, the other day, he knew what he was going to fay better than he did before he uttered his words. Besides, he knew it was the practice in country courts to endeavor to. confufe a speaker by interrup tion, but he had been too long in public life to be thus affefted.) . The Speaker said, any member'had v a right to call another to order. Mr, H. said he did not mean to call the gentleman to or der ; then, replied the Speaker, " You, Sir, are out of order." Mr. Smith proceeded; - He said tie.had lately seen papers, which he meant to lay before the secretary, of .state, from which he found.that orders.had been issued in April last by admiral Harvey and general Simcoe, for taking all American Vessels bound for Hifpaniola, and to carry- them into Cape Nichola Mole. . H e ' had mentioned on a ■former Cccafion, the manner in which col. Talbot had' been treated by the Britifli ad miral, the gentleman from South Carolina r,t thar time apologized for his conduft, by faying colonel Talbot had behaved improp erly, He no'jv informed that gentleman, that so far from this colonel Talbot was not permitred"tbswi to the admiral. —The indignity (hewn to our minister, Mr. • S. said, seemed to be more dwelt upon than the spoliations. But, suppose, said he, we were to complain to the French government, might not M. De la Croix fay " What In jury has been done to you ; your minister could n<jt diplomatically be received, since our minister has been recalled—you have merely mistaken an article in diplomatic pro ceedings." Suppose this were found to be the cafe. The complaint would then only be, " You did not (hew a fufficient degree of politeness to our minister." The answer might be, " We told him he might remain amongst us fubjeft to the fame laws with other ftrangcrs." And surely, said Mr. S. we who are tenacious of our own laws, (hall not refufe to refpeft those of other countries. He confeffed he was no diplo matic man, but he supposed this might be the course such a complaint would take. With refpeft to the previous question, it appeared to him when principles had been folly determined upon, and an attempt was made to set them alide, this was the best way of preventing the measure. . If the gentle-, men who supported -the- proposition would vote fur the whole, when amended he would alfo-vote for it ; if not, he would vote for the previous question j beeaiife he did not like tricking. Mr. Otis said-he was not deterred from giving his opinion 011 this fubjeft, from the high refponfibiifty which was attached to it; he hoped that the previous question would not prevail, but that the main question would be put. If they were brot to a- dcci fion on this question, it was.not the fault of gentlemen on his fide. It appeared to him, there could only be three realons for wi(hing to postpone a decision on the main question ; they Were, thq.t gentlemen were ready to abandon the spoliations altogether, or that it was inexpedient to enti?- into the discussi on of them at present, or they were- r.ot pre pared to enter upon it. With refpeft "to the firft, he could Jnot believe any gentleman wiihed seriously to give up the claims. As to the feco«'', he believed it weald have Wren expolieut, if they had net gfcne ob tain kngtha ; but, if they wfire to dictate to the.Prelident one set of terms, he wifheil to add something to them which would ren der them left exceptionable. But this was called a war proposition, a trammelling of th: Executive. A war proposition ! fiiid Mr. O. a" redress of wroHgs ! Was it ever' cr'niinal to, express a hope i Hope, the confutation of the. Wretched—-Hope, whicli tt>e nmlefactor at the bar may entertain with out affronting his judge! If this were the cafe, we werfsfthe last extremity of //«. vtiTiatithk ■ Brit 'ft would trammel-the Exe cutive. If it were not a ferioiis' fubjeft, said he, any man-help, fmiijag, that the fe men who -haVe advocated the equality clavfe, should complain of this., If gentle men'," addfcd M?l 0. will knock down the Executive, on one' fide and the other, it would be . necefftry for him to have a prop, at some future period, tOi support himfelf, either, by.meansof corruption or byforce! But, he believed, if<they did not encroach upon his prerogatives, he would be able to support himfelf." But gentlemen were unprepared to meet the queflion. Why unprepared ? Because we want documents. But, added he, sup. pose there were no evidence,, or that the faft was not true, where would be th* -danger of hoping redress ? What member of the Ex ecutive Directory could: complain of this ? It would only be a vain hope, such as they were many of them m tKe habit of making, and which he had sifver heard were insult ing. But would the gentleman from Mary land go back to B.shimore and fay there were no documents ? Were there not de predations committed, and at this hour com mitting upon the property of his conftftu ents ? They would not permit him to doubt on the fubjeft ; -they would fjy to him, " look at the tears of the widows and chil dren ; our injuries flare everyone m.[he face ; they are kit in the heart of evtrv man." .. Another reason for- addi.ig tin's* clati/f *; he did-sot decide that compenlation ana een ceffion fh<jukl go hand in hand, Jbut..he would riot decide the contrary ; and if-tfcey were called upon-to respond one part offlie speech, and-not the other, they would-be understood to fay, they should not' go hand in hand ; for according to a legal majfim, the designation of one tßihg wa; the excln fion of another." He believed it would be seen by this vote, therefore;, who were- the friends of the merchants, and who were not. He denied that there was any trap intended by this question. He profeifed it his inten tion to vote for both propofition^." Mr. Gallatin said the question hadaf fumed fomewlwt of a different shape fmce yesterday, as several gentlemen had expreflfed their intention of voting fpr both 'proposi tions, I his would have induced ham-to vote for the amendment, for the- - fake <if conciliation, if he had not strong.objections to it; therefore, when he ftated'his reasons for voting against the main question,, he did it that they might be anfwerdd, if they were not well founded. - The gentlemen who supported this -a mencknent, said, - c furely~ we can;have no objeftion Jo express a hope.' If no more was <jxpijefled, there.,could."net be a single objection'to it. • r - - : ' Gentlemen need not to" have told them there'was no degradation 4fi'eXprefiing a hope. If it was nothing more it tfojild be an unnecessary thing. ButtHe- amendment proposed, not only helped thaffuch' a di'fpo fition wonld ex iff," but it went on to i«y, that that difpolition WQuld produce aa.ac commodatio'n. It was to this he-objected. He considered it in the shape of an ultima-- turn.. It was the condition of the hope that it would produce accommodation If that disposition was not found eh the part of F ranee, there was no Lcpe of accommodation. This appeared to him to.be the literal mean ing of the amendment. He ifi ight be mis taken ;' he wished a different 'coivfti-u&ion could be given to it. Mr. Gallatin ; men tioned several collateral rqafons for Believing tliat this was the conftruciion- intended to be given to it. If Mr. G. said", this proposition was meant as ari uitimatinny it- would doubt-, less strengthen the hands of the' Executive. If they were prepared to fay, that except the French will pay the amo'ulit.pf the spo liations committed npon our ccmmerce, we will go to war, it would have an efled. Being, however, a doubtful thing, was a fuf ficient reason for his voting in favour of thf previous question. He denied tfiat it was the fame thing to fay they would not take up the btifinefs as to negative' it, since to decline the consideration of it at present, would not be to abandon it. (The remainder of this debate to-morrow.) Lailson's Circus, South FiftbStrcct The Public arc refpe&fuily informed fhafc The Performances at the NE W CIRCIF3 To-Morrow June Will.begin by a Grand Parade cf Equeftria.i Pei formers of- both sexes. A grand display of Horfemanihip* By MefTrs. Hern an, C. Vande**ki/, Nicholas Cone, Sully, {ihtf Clown,} and Mr. Sully, in the chan cer ol CfoVvii, perform a varicty.ot Comic-Feats. Mr. Lajlson will perform leveral cynous and *• f tonifhirig excreifesi which he will not undertake to enumerate, in order to.forprizr the fpc&ator;. hit aim being to please :—arid nothing (hall be to render the exerciCes worthy the attention of the i*" rnateurs of tbis new art. . Ibe Pcdcjlal, By the beautiful Pl-iaccfs—(which has never b»en #x ecuted in America) i After which wijl be prefertted '{for the second time) the favorite french comic opera, called Le Tableau Parlant; Or, Tl;t Speaking Pidure. With elegantnr.w fcenei y, execu ed by Mr. Perouanv. The cvenihg'n entertainment will conclude by a i'econd rcprefentation of the pantomime, called Harlequin Mariner; Or, THE DISTRESSED-TAR. Wiih iliexstions, additions, ofw scenery, dccori tiori, Sic.
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers