Lancaster farming. (Lancaster, Pa., etc.) 1955-current, March 16, 2002, Image 10
AlO-Lancaster Farming, Saturday, March 16,2002 ** J*J«W >. ** OPINION Farm Bill And The Best ‘Safety Net ’ In put it milcJK. it's difficult (or producers in nwm parts of the country to decide what long- (or c\cn short-) langc plans to ha\c for their business when the I arm Bill still hasn't been signed into law. Some (arm organizations can't agree what version is best. American I arm Bureau federation (AFBF) recently noted they want the final hill b\ the end ot this month. They oppose provisions in the Senate bill, including commoditv payment limits of $275,000 per farm family. (House ver sion is $550,000 ) Ihev also don't like a provision that would shift water regu lation authontv Ironi states to the (cdcral government. AFBF would rather have expanded voluntarv conservation incentives to increase cost-sharing op tions lor farmers. I lie National I armers L nion (NFL ), on the other hand, supports the Sen ate version, which provides, thev sav. a broader, more comprehensive safety net compared to the House version. In the March 4 farm Bureau News, pages 4-5 outline niccl) what AFBF's priorities would be and compares the two versions. The> should approve of some aspects ol the Senate version, with its soybean loan rate reductions. I hev also are on the "same page" regarding payment limits (AFBF wants 550,000 tor Bl C direct payments. $75,000 tor countercyclical payments, and $150,000 for MK.s/l DIM Al Bl prelers a total payment limn ol $550,000. same as the House version, compared to the Senate’s $275,000. I very body believes that conservation incentive programs should continue. \ big area ol the new 1 arm Bill proposals, under the Senate bill, contains a dairy title thal would piovide support tor dairy producers in 12 northeast dairy slates, including Beiinsv Ivama, New 'lork, Maryland, and others. The piogiam would provide producers a payment whenever the monthl> Class I (fluid milk) price tails below $16.94 per hundredweight (CWT). This program is taigeted to dairy (arms with about 400 cows or less. The Senate bill would cslend the dairy price support program at the current level of $9.90 per CWT. Stale (iiange has noted that producers should be allowed to choose between the Dairy Compacts, which they believe promote stable milk prices, or the new dnecl payment program Orange also backs a federal dairy support price ol at least $9 90 C W 1 Nl I sees that the hill must provide an economic safety net that "provides leahstic support lor working farmers." according to a recent news release. VVc agree I ven the Soil and Water Conservation Society recently released a report, which clearly notes the Senate bill favors more long-term, wide-rang ing progiams. with funding to conservation programs outstripping the House bill bv about S 4 billion over 10 years. What’s keeping this thing from passing? Well, politics, as usual. So much is al stake, with the country now only pulling out of recession and commodity pi ices the lowest we’ve seen Not to mention election-year turmoil, with all the candidates promising to solve constituent problems. , \nd lemember. 1 urope still far "out-siibsidi/cs" ag programs compared to the I S I Ins continues to create a trade disadvantage lor farmers here. And if tiade lemauis a priority, producer/constituents want critical provisions met. / aiutnlcr / anniiifi doesn’t want to see the needs of larmers hampered, es pecially in these trying times. But we like the Senate version better, since we believe larmers would benefit in a variety of wavs, not just on direct payments but on many other provisions. It’s reasonable. They should sign it. I’.i I loot liimmer's Gel-Together. Kish \ less Holstems. Relies ille. (717)994-16)6 4-H l<nm Consignment Sale. York Counts 4-H Center. (717) 2')2-2 19S Inuime Oppoi tunnies lor Rural \reas Meeting, \ikmis C omits / diior. On February 9. I was invited to attend an informational meeting an Minneapolis-St. Paul. Minn, loi the purpose of discussing state milk orders. Through the ef forts of a large and active group of Minnesota dairymen known as Milk Powei, the Minnesota state legislature is considering enacting a state marketing order not dis similar to the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board (PMMB). 1 found Dr. Ken Bailey of Penn State University in attend ance, and he presented a compar .1 ❖ Farm Calendar ❖ ■C oopcrati\c extension burg. (717) 334-6271. Ohio Bed Fxpo. Ohio Fxpo Center Columbus. (785) 776-7067. I asettc Counts Extension Annual Board Meeting. lasette Counts I airgrounds. 6;.W p.m. "rite Future ol Agriculture, (Turn to Page A 11) ❖ Farm Forum ❖ ison between the existing PMMB and the proposed Minnesota leg islation. He included a six-page handout with his presentation. To say that I was shocked by what Dr. Bailey had to say would be an understatement. His initial presentation omitted extremely relevant information on the PMMB, making it seem both in effectual in dairy pricing and as little more than a regulatory state sanitation board. His "advice" to Minnesota was to forget the no- (Turn to Page A2B) Getty s- Twin To Apply Nitrogen To Small Grain Dr. Elwood Hatley in the agrono my department suggests the rate and timing of spring-applied nitrogen de pends on several factors. The first factor is growth stage. If the plants are at growth stage 2 (main stem and one or two tillers) or less, apply the nitrogen as soon as plants start “greening-up." If the plants are past growth stage two, the nitrogen can be applied from “green up" to growth stage 5 (early erect growth). Refer to the 2002 Agronomy Guide, page 73, for a description of growth stages. The 2002 agronomy guide is available on the Internet at http://agguide.agronomy.psu.edu/. The nitrogen rate will depend on anticipated yield, previous crop yield, previous fertilizer amounts, and fre quency and amount of manure ap plied. Each bushel of wheat grain produced will require 1.3 to 1.5 pounds of nitrogen. Estimating the amount that will be supplied by the soil is important. Excessive nitrogen applications effect profitability, in crease disease pressures, increase lodging potential, decrease yields, and increase the potential for nitro gen leaching. Inadequate nitrogen also affects profitability since it will result in reduced yield. One of the major factors affecting soil available nitrogen is frequency of manure applications. Research indi cates that when fields are manured every one or two years, one should apply 0 to 30 pounds nitrogen per IS ABRAHAM IN YOUR FAMILY TREE? Background Scripture: Romans 4. Devotional Reading: Psalms 32:6-11. It seems that we spend the first half of our lives hoping anxiously that we will get what’s coming to us. and the second half hoping desper ately that we will not get what is coming to us. We begin looking for justice and end depending upon mercy. At the start, our lives are fo cused on our own merit: at the end, upon the grace of God. Sooner or later in life we realize that we will never be righteous enough to earn the favor of God. The gap between our moral capacity and God's will is just too wide to be bridged by human effort. God alone can and does bridge this terrible dis tance. Mam of us enter adult life belier ing that, if we work hard enough, long enough, sincere!) and wisel) Lancaster Farming An Award-Winning Farm Newspaper • Kevslone Aw aids 199! 199 S • PennAg Industries 1992 • PAC D Media Auaid 1996 • Berks Ag-Business Council 2000 • Recogm/ed lor photo excellence throughout the vears bv the Noitheast farm Communicators acre; if applied every three to four years, one should apply 30 to 60 pounds nitrogen per acre: and when applied less frequently, one should apply 60 to 90 pounds nitrogen per acre. Winter barley has less resistance to lodging then wheat; therefore, the ni trogen rates should be reduced accordingly. Keep the nitrogen rates between 45 and 60 pounds per acre when manure is not applied fre quently to the field. When manure is frequently applied, use only 0 to 30 pounds nitrogen per acre. To Scout Small (•rain Fields For Weeds A good vigorous stand of a small grain crop sometimes does not need any herbicide to get acceptable weed control. However, one needs to walk the fields to be able to see winter an nual weeds that could be growing ag gressively at this time of the year. Shepherds purse, henbit, chick weed, and mustard are common win ter annuals that infest small grains. If these weeds are present and the field does not have a history of Cana da thistle, then apply a postemer gence product as soon as possible. Check in the 2002 agronomy guide for the list of recommended products and the suitable growth stages of the small grain when the products can be applied. For best control, these prod ucts should be applied when the weeds are actively growing and a surfactant should be added to the herbicide. However, if the small grain field has a history of Canada thistle, then delaying the application until the thistle emerges is necessary to get control. To get the best thistle con trol, one should add to the tank mix a product strong on thistles or switch to one of these products alone. Sting er is the best rated product for thistle control and can be applied up until stage nine of the small grain develop ment. To Seed Alfalfa Using Good Establishment Principles According to Dr. Marvin Hall, good stand establishment is essential to optimizing the production poten tial of alfalfa. Thin stands encourage weed invasion, reduce yield, and may shorten the life of the stand. Consid ering these negative consequences of poor stand establishment along with the high actual and opportunity costs associated with establishing alfalfa, it is important to minimize the chances of failure. Numerous activities including enough, we can win whatever it is in life that we are seeking. Our trust is basically in ourselves. But then, along the way, life deals us some blows and we learn that the results are not in our own hands. It is then that many of us realize that the only solution is to trust, not in ourselves, but in God and his promises. Far Beyond Belief This trust entails belief, but it goes far beyond belief. There are lots of things which I may believe, but it is the things in which we trust that make the difference in my life. For example, there is a test which is sometimes given to determine in advance if a particular person can be hypnotized. The hypnotist stands be hind the would-be subject and tells him to let himself fall backward into his arms. Many people will do just that because they believe he will do what he says. But there are some, who, no matter that they believe the sincerity of the hypnotist, cannot bring themselves to fall backward. They believe him but they do not trust him. When Paul and other biblical writ ers speak of “faith," most often they are talking about the trust whicri goes far beyond belief. Belief is easy, but trust asks much more of us. So when Paul quotes Genesis 15:6, he is speaking of a “belier which is dem onstrated in trust. Abraham believed God's promises and entrusted him self to the Lord. Faith is a belief so strong that we entrust ourselves to it. The word “reckoned" here means "credited." God gave Abraham cred it, not for his works or his pro- weed control, adjusting soil pH and fertility, and selecting the best variety need to be completed well in advance of actually seeding a new alfalfa stand. Remember that "the lack of planning is planning for failure.” Hall suggests the number one rea son for poor alfalfa stand establish ment is seeding too deep. The agron omic rule of thumb is not to plant a seed deeper than 5 times its diame ter. That means that alfalfa shouldn't be seeded deeper than A inch. Any deeper than 'A inch in creases risks of poor emergence and a weak stand. A tilled seedbed must be firm in order to have accurate seeding depth. It is very important to attain good seed-to-soil contact. The alfalfa seed must absorb approximately 125 per cent of its own weight in water to germinate. From the alfalfa seed’s perspective, that's a lot of water! Since the water must move from the soil into the seed, it is crucial that the seed be in contact with as much soil as possible. Poor seed-to-soil contact results in poor and sporadic germina tion that lowers the number of pro ductive alfalfa plants in the stand. Alfalfa seeding rate recommenda tions vary considerably across the country depending on soil and envi ronmental conditions. Reducing seeding rates below the recommend ed level is not the place to cut corners on alfalfa establishment. Economic analyses show that less than 4 per cent of the total cost associated with altalfa production is seed cost. Re ducing alfalfa seeding rates is truly being “penny-wise and pound fool ish.” While there has been a lot of de bate over which seeding method (for example, broadcast, fluid seeding, or no-till) is the “best,” it really isn’t a big issue as long as each method is done correctly. This includes not seeding too deep, getting good seed to-soil contact, and making sure enough seeds are being seeded per acre. While these basic alfalfa establish ment principles seem rather routine, every year there are unnecessary es tablishment failures. Many of these failures occurred because of one or more of the basic principles outlined above weren’t followed. This year, don't focus on the details of alfalfa establishment so much that the basic principles are forgotten. » Quote Of The Week: “Surplus wealth is a sacred trust which its possessor is hound to ad minister in his lifetime for the good of the community. ” Andrew Carnegie nounced beliefs, but for his trust. It is like getting a bill for a million dollars and finding on the statement a credit in the same amount. The amount of the credit is a gift that you could never have earned. Easy To Say It is easy to say “1 believe in God Almighty,’' but something else to put yourself and life into the hands of that God. This usually requires something of a struggle. For example, the promise of God to Abraham seemed utterly ridicu lous. At their age they knew it was \irtually impossible to conceive and bear a child. So the faithful response of Abraham is based not upon the reasonableness of the promise, but on the One who makes it. Certainly Abraham must have doubted the promises, even if only momentarily. But Paul says, “No distrust made him waiver concerning the promise of God, but he grew strong in his faith as he gave the glory to God, fully convinced that God was able to do what he had promised” (Rom. 4:20,21). This trust is not a family or racial trait. Any and all of us can have it. If we offer God this trust we become the spiritual descendants of Abra ham. It is offered to all “those who share the faith of Abraham, for he is the father of us a 11...” (4:16). Lancaster Farming Established 1955 Published Every Saturday Kphrata Kc\ic« Building I K. Main St. Kphrata, PA 17522 —by— Lancaster Farming, Inc. A Stemman Enterprise William J Burgess General Manager Andy Andrews, Editor Copyright 2002 by Lancaster Farming