AlO-Lancaster Farming, Saturday, March 16,2002 ** J*J«W >. ** OPINION Farm Bill And The Best ‘Safety Net ’ In put it milcJK. it's difficult (or producers in nwm parts of the country to decide what long- (or c\cn short-) langc plans to ha\c for their business when the I arm Bill still hasn't been signed into law. Some (arm organizations can't agree what version is best. American I arm Bureau federation (AFBF) recently noted they want the final hill b\ the end ot this month. They oppose provisions in the Senate bill, including commoditv payment limits of $275,000 per farm family. (House ver sion is $550,000 ) Ihev also don't like a provision that would shift water regu lation authontv Ironi states to the (cdcral government. AFBF would rather have expanded voluntarv conservation incentives to increase cost-sharing op tions lor farmers. I lie National I armers L nion (NFL ), on the other hand, supports the Sen ate version, which provides, thev sav. a broader, more comprehensive safety net compared to the House version. In the March 4 farm Bureau News, pages 4-5 outline niccl) what AFBF's priorities would be and compares the two versions. The> should approve of some aspects ol the Senate version, with its soybean loan rate reductions. I hev also are on the "same page" regarding payment limits (AFBF wants 550,000 tor Bl C direct payments. $75,000 tor countercyclical payments, and $150,000 for MK.s/l DIM Al Bl prelers a total payment limn ol $550,000. same as the House version, compared to the Senate’s $275,000. I very body believes that conservation incentive programs should continue. \ big area ol the new 1 arm Bill proposals, under the Senate bill, contains a dairy title thal would piovide support tor dairy producers in 12 northeast dairy slates, including Beiinsv Ivama, New 'lork, Maryland, and others. The piogiam would provide producers a payment whenever the monthl> Class I (fluid milk) price tails below $16.94 per hundredweight (CWT). This program is taigeted to dairy (arms with about 400 cows or less. The Senate bill would cslend the dairy price support program at the current level of $9.90 per CWT. Stale (iiange has noted that producers should be allowed to choose between the Dairy Compacts, which they believe promote stable milk prices, or the new dnecl payment program Orange also backs a federal dairy support price ol at least $9 90 C W 1 Nl I sees that the hill must provide an economic safety net that "provides leahstic support lor working farmers." according to a recent news release. VVc agree I ven the Soil and Water Conservation Society recently released a report, which clearly notes the Senate bill favors more long-term, wide-rang ing progiams. with funding to conservation programs outstripping the House bill bv about S 4 billion over 10 years. What’s keeping this thing from passing? Well, politics, as usual. So much is al stake, with the country now only pulling out of recession and commodity pi ices the lowest we’ve seen Not to mention election-year turmoil, with all the candidates promising to solve constituent problems. , \nd lemember. 1 urope still far "out-siibsidi/cs" ag programs compared to the I S I Ins continues to create a trade disadvantage lor farmers here. And if tiade lemauis a priority, producer/constituents want critical provisions met. / aiutnlcr / anniiifi doesn’t want to see the needs of larmers hampered, es pecially in these trying times. But we like the Senate version better, since we believe larmers would benefit in a variety of wavs, not just on direct payments but on many other provisions. It’s reasonable. They should sign it. I’.i I loot liimmer's Gel-Together. Kish \ less Holstems. Relies ille. (717)994-16)6 4-H l