f I your grass control loreser than Lasso. WEEKS AFTER APR ICATION _,lOO o cc o h 9O o *BO ECOI Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Surface Applied: Silt Loam Soil; 2.6% O.M. Dual (2 pts./Acre) Lasso (5 pts./Acre) WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION ~100 O CC o & 90 *BO Seneca, New York: PPI: Sandy Loam Soil: 1.7% O.M. Dual (1.5 pts./Acre) Lasso (6 pts./Acre) WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION *lo° 8 O —1 s 90 o ECONOMIC CONTROIIeVEL \ DUAL— LASSO Delaware County, Ohio: PPI: Silt Loam Soil: 2.3% O.M. Dual(2pts./Acre) Lasso (10 pts./Acre) These graphs were taken from tests in five states: Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York and Maryland. show the results of side by side Dual and Lasso performance over time* Herbicide effectiveness was meas ured by how well each controlled Japanese Millet, a grass highly sensitive to these herbicides. WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION ~100 o ft 90 *BO ECONOMIC CONTROL LEVEL DUAL"" LASSO- Lake Shore, Maryland: Surface Applied: Sandy Loam Soil: 1.5% O.M. Dual (1.5 pts./Acre) Lasso (4 pts./Acre) WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION ~100 o ft 90 o *BO ~ ECONOMIC CONTROL LEVEL DUAL— LASSO eneca, New York: Surface Applied: Sandy Loam Soil: 1.7% O.M. lual (1.5 pts./Acre) Lasso (6 pts./Acre) WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION _,lOO 8 * - 90 a S BO % ECONOMIC CONTROL LEVEL DUAL LASSO Delaware County, Ohio: Surface Applied: Silt Loam Soil: 2.3% O.M. Dual (2 pts./Acre) Lasso (5 pts./Acre) In these tests. Dual lasted 4 to 6 weeks longer than Lasso. Ciba-Geigy, Ag. Div., Box 11422, Greensboro, NC 27409 CIBA-GEIGY For soybeans and com. “Dual was applied at labeled rates and Lasso was applied at or above labeled rates Dual. Lancaster Farming, Saturday, March 21,
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers