Clarence Harnish, Lampeter, Pa This was my first year with the Harvestall When my corn was dried commercially last year it cost me 27C per bushel With the Harvestall it didn t cost over 6 c per bushel and the test weight was 58 to 59 lbs I m pleased with the quality corn I get and I m pleased with the savings I would recommend the Harvestall system to farmers who are looking for storage or drying because it has done for me the job it was designed to do "Harvestall Chillcuring work I get better quality corn for less ATTENTION FARMERS! ADVANCED AG SYSTEMS CIRCLE STEEL BUILDINGS DO YOU REALLY NEED A STORAGE BUILDING If you could afford a new building every 10 years, a Circle Steel building wouldn’t be necessary- But most farmers make an investment in a building that will last longer than 10 years...many are investing in Circle Steel to get that longer life with less yearly maintenance. If you want long-term return on your building investment, make it a Circle Steel...from Advanced Ag Systems RD2, Box 174 Elverson. PA 19520 215-286-9118 Ken Sauder 717-656-6519 cost.” Advanced Ag Systems RD2, Box 174 Elverson, PA 19520 215-286-9118 Ken Sauder 717-656-6519 ■■■■■CALL NOW TO GET THIS YEAR S CROP ■■IN A HARVEST ALL ■■ INTRODUCES I Ml , ‘T THIS GOOD? iV&A Milford Mast 215-286-9118 Lancaster Farming, Saturday, Novembers, 1980—A27 wxsaii ill Milford Mast 215-286-9118 jfe j The Harvestall M Chillcuring System It’s simple When grain comes out of the field it’s a living seed So instead of destroying the seed with high heat, moisture is removed with natural air ventilation The grain keeps all its feed value, there is less shrinkage than with heat drying because only moisture is removed, not dry matter You II never see white dust in Chillcured corn You actually save half of what you’re used to losing in heat shrink There’s no gas or oil to buy Natural air carries away heat and moisture as the corn releases it Harvestall Chillcunng is a back-to-basics system that |ust simply makes good sense Find out more about Letters To The Editor Dear Editor: Your Editorial, Nov. 1, 1960, on SMV violations is an example of the kind of reporting, that is the crux of our problems, in our society. You are right in your ob servations on the public highways and right of ways. You are wrong in your observations on private property. I believe that even if a person is basically wrong on their own (or leased) property, it is none of any other perons’s business. In some types of govern ment, people, like yourself, would be rewarded for their observations and reporting of a violation on another persons property. I hope that we still have a free society and that people who mind other people’s business are put down and not rewarded. I believe property rights are the place where people should be able to express their rights and freedoms, even if not done properly or in accordance with the law, unless it directly interferes with an adjoining property. After all if we can’t ex press our freedoms on our own property, where else can we express our freedom? Or are, our freedoms just a figmentabon of our minds and govern ment? Daniel M. Groff lititz
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers