g1.i.r.. : 4',...5r.r*0..'...,:,...... : 4.b.p1irri. . Jona ‘Weir 16july68 New Series , Vpl. v , o. $3 00 By Mail. $3 50 By. Carrier. 50ets Additional after *roe Months. " " • I+, gmtrirait t.ts TIETTIDAY, NEW, iNii: , ` , o l .l):,.4oo4.ii' : **:Oi.' .1* ATOSIIMENT*4- , ffS , MIME. . .. , We have already eitpiressed *ore than ayti l t-, patby.witb Yrof.,,lXotif,e, in # biii.aposuri of the . fallacy and u4sprkptnralness ef tie so-paled i Moral , 1 #11441e; : f 0 0 43 7- ' And 1!"e )believe he: will find the New School Church with 'Min as a ij body, in rejecting any theory of the Atonernint based upon , mere ' benevolenbe in the .divine ..na-) tore.. 'Re will.;:fmd us overwhelmingly,,if wit unanimously, with him in, the belief that :the attinern4t Was ilesigned i l4,''.'sBme into sense satisfy justice ras in nltimate'principle-of theviii; vine nature :4 great buglitaY hie been Illa iii Taylorism 1 113 ., )04+ :' ,i i -e i SA°4 :O /1° 47 X .- or 4 this volume,' and in the July and. januaryaiiiiit bens of the PWlie l etion levii ' Iffebelleye there is about as ranch Taylorieut itk:enel branch alLin the other';'' that isiitett to none !Will. ' And' h regard to the tderpi,piit'fort4:,l4ltoga p o yi l tory, that the, teachings of Di. ,N, W. <Taylor and, Prof. Ptirk 14 redognizeil4s orthoißit iii'thii ptd posed nnited-.Churoli,it 4oes : not ,cortinitg!Coitr, sympatlay; ; ao we . doubt Yot 41. would-. have , exei- I ted geeerel jpitp* *Vie 'isT9W:oohOOf ChtliCh, if it had not been regarded: ;as an offset to the exclusive' :9 1 4 114 6w pellet- upon which -many in the. Old sqho4l, bititieh were alone willing to have the re-Union brought about,. We shallibe perfectly content, with a poliey : broad enough to include the ieachings of ottr , ; own theological Seminaizies and :Our :own. leading'. theologians, without travelling ' into other denominations. And we think eve4,Presbytery in our body, will say the same thing when the time for saying it comes, We are glad to have Prof. Hodge , niththe New School body alrm, in disavowing the OM menial theory, and the absurd 'and ,inamoilti doctrine of a transfer`' o9Wl — trete - 0 , e to another., Prof if - edge's indignation that Mr. Barnes should quote the coarse bold language of Luther, bn imputation, from the' Commentary on Galatians, as showing to what results these ex treme views legititnately lead, is a healthy symp tom. And' as to the idea of exacting the same sufferings from Christ as would have been the proper penalty of the law , visited on sinners, this Old School professor denounces it as " outrageous injustice," as " an illegal violation of that absolute righteormess which is the prin cfpiton essendi off thi) The' Substitution of Christ, he says, necessarily involves; as a mat ter of justice, the substitution of different kinds and degrees Of suffering." In the following sentence, he comes so near Mr. Barnes' position, that the question is raised whether, like the comet of 1843 (was it?) he does not actually touch the sun. Sweeping 'towards that steady luminary, he says : "Christ suffered precisely that kind, duration and degree of suffering that the infinitely wise.jnstice, or the absolutely just wis dom of Clod determined was a full equivalent for all that was demanded of elect sinners , in person; aptivalent we mean in respect to sin expiating, and justice satisfying efficacy—and a full equiv alent in being 'of equal effieacy' in theie respects in strict rigor of justice; -according ~ to the judg ment of God." Barnes, on page 247 of his book on the Atonement, speaks of, two senses in which substitution, is accomplished under the atonemeut. First, "In the fact that the unde served and , voluntary imfferings of one are in place 'of the '.deserved sufferings of= another," and second, " in the nature of the sufferings en dared; that his sufferings shall not be the same in 'kind or degree whioh the sufferings of the guilty themselves would haie been, but of such a nature as to be a proper equivalent for them, or shall in the eireumstanier of the case; answer the same ends which would 'have , 'been accom plished,by those sufferine.P , Theae,:two quotations ate probably the most important , that- can be brought from either, of the two books, to illustrate the relative views of the authors and the two schools on the nature of the atonement. these two sentences hinges a great 'part. of the contro'versy. p ro f. H o d ge and Mr. Barnes are se nearly alike, that it takes no small amount of analytic power to discern and render comprehensible 4.9tkers the difference. The comet does not 'touch the sun, but the lustre of the two bodies is so intermingled that they may well be regarded as'Ark contact:, It is, Prof. Hodge; however, who makes a _great account of the difference, and we :'must him `in an attempt' to. estimate its, significance. The for all its puzzling nearness to the sun, whirled around it; and sped awl , again , and will 1 : 1 9t be near the central luniinaryegain for ages. . ' The difficulty itriseS from thefiet,` that Prof. Hodge insists . On regFding'Chriat'S sufferings . as penal, nay more, as precisely the same with what his people virould,havestiffered,,when considered as penalty:. ,riteys bake up a..lsenal , quantityi which„ by rettOon of thevarue of one of the fae tora -Lthe ''' f th ' - 14.te—is ecra i l t i .' , , map. o , e su,,. n : is precisely, the dame, as thestiArings ? view i ettas Penalty, of. the entire telect people., , .flew', Mt. Rapes and the: islewSChoer,wOuld, 'say equally ii.o. 'the .Profesibs, Jhalghtiat'Sinilferings' are in place of the iufferingS'of siniters;, that they are any expresition of-God's hatred,of, sin;yhich he always . ; shows -by-connecting it ,with-suffering; that they are ,necessary before' he can pardon sin ; lut that not being visited on the offender,they are, not II punishment of Sin, nor a p,ertatty, , nor `the: penalty for isin,but they are a substitute for the'penaltyl of 'the law, which 'being voluntarily 'suffered by the Law=giver hiM3alt in the petsoik , 4 , :o,iiipOOO, iiie gee , n i ndo4,o be` equivalent; M as AP" of tile4iTille RM;Wence...k*%Pd of 4;9' , divine faithfulness to. law 'and ,governmettt., Let us repeat, for the poineis vital : Both Parties' - believe that thelliderings of - Chrittt . were! en-! Aired .iii the PlaCe - of - sin ilerS ; iJufferingeetaured because and'in place of, those owed by sinners to' -the' law; ,that , they. are, in place ,of those suffer •ings, which, all moral _beings, divine,' angelie.i.and human, so far as we know,instinctively;•Le. for re fi ritiS which Canbot he,.. inarySed, 'demand - Of all- 7 ,..., - Dor .. 1 o enders awainst the law. See. Mr IlarneS ,on the liesign of punishment, Atonement, pp.:1 . 93,4, quoted with approval by. Prof. , Hodgeypagessl. See /dad Barnes on the inattiie of therkAtonettient„ Pp. 202,'256. 'And here - it' is' iiellleitiote the, fact'that Mr. Barnes parts'company with the; advocates of the-Gorrnmentar TheorY, a1t4144i Prof.. Hodge with, an nupardonable disregarcL 4 4±l facts which he himself had elswhere'neted,,elasseii him, pp. 341,2, with the advticatei of this the ory. liiii.Bed,i'On ''Page 351, he declaree thqt f` Barnes" with severakethers, "materially departs from the true: faith _as ,to the nature Of ; the, iitonement." Of' Vine , it was,,neeessary that he*. a teirible -ohafe ilfektlitet"shitainid'Nvith . some shoi 3 Of payment, if it were only to link , . his name ,with , a Belli* of known inadequate views. (See!alsopage 39, where he even, assoei ates Mr. Barnes•with the cSocinitins.) But Prof. -Hodge 'knows p l erfectlY well that Mr. ; Barnes' views differ, on an essential ptiint,' from the Gov-, ernmental Theory. That Theory, in the very first lines in which it is, described in Prof Hodge's book,- page 327, "'places.the necessity Of the Atonement- of 'Christ in the exigencies of God's moral Government; not in the' demands of an involuntary organic emotion of retributive justice 'common to . God a4d man." Prof Hodge's own, quotations show how wide apart ,from this view of punishment is Mr. Barnes'. Let,us add a - few quotations of our own, from page 194, of Mi. Barnes' book : " There is, back of any idea of . . . protecting the community, the feeling that it is RIGHT that the offender should be made to 'suffer. . . When we sees - man justly punished, we think of this not as ..,designed to .protect the community, hut we think of him as suffering that , which our nature tells us is right,'whateirer may be the consequences in these other - respects. We rejoice in the belief that these incidental effects'will follow from the infliction, of the pun ishment, but we should regard' it as a violation of justice : . if, these views should guide the Magis trate in determining the amount of punishment; 'that is, if it were only so much as would, best tend to reform the' offender, 'or to later others, or to proteo the community. We'demand some thing more; we demand that witichwill,ln some prpper sense; express whett he,eritee deserves." We contend , that these extracts put an impassa ble barrier between Mr. Barnes and the Taylorite view; ,of the Atonement. Mr. Barnes and the New School generally, to the best of our know ledge and belief, cleave. to those healthful doc trines; now so widely impugned,. on which alone the majesty and supremacy of ali , laNsi, divine and , . jipman„rest. They hold that justice, in itself considered, demands suffering for sin, and "'that therefote Christ had-to suffer - before, the sinus • , could be pardoned. , Now 'Prof. Hodge insists that we shat call the t sufferings of-Christ, thus put in place o -'sinners,: penal, nay " pretsely the very pentiliy of the t. law," pp. 168; although admitti i ng, in the same breath, that the sufferings of Christ are different in quantity and quality from/hose of the sinner. Mr: Barnes and the New School believe that sufferings `which are different in quantity and quality from those 4PAc' of the sinner, cannot with any. propriety be called, like those, penal : they would say with Prof' Hodge, " that all which.the law, in , strict rigor of justice demands on the account of our' Sins," is rendered by the suffer ings of Chrst."Aecepted instead of ours;" but they prefer to,say that these sufferings of Christ PHILADELPHIA, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY : 27, 1868. ate'not,s substituted pen but `'a sub ti.t.late for , the penalty;'l'heypress,,l S iof.:'lTOdge with :ibe difficulty; : bow s , any suffering can ;be, a, penalty, which is' not visited on the offender. hitneelf; in the kind and degree's ountemplited. by law ;. he, turnin k i ass; how attytbijit r bd penalty can' an sorer' the demands of' 1?1.0 . 1.#00 answer to,Pnr qgnstion , wo:*.o fgroaftor• Mr. Barles!'insiver.to , thelkpesticin, how. mgs;'which not Penali'ditneedonsiplishqin ends 'penalty,VubstantfilV4 o ry.ggsiong : ~ °94;1 1 4.6 44 * niake;- after going but.litheinen further his theory. Mr. Barn,stingrodnees the. inquirer asking : " What after Itift'is 'the value of litich suifferinp .L What iS,thetg -f eaact bearing 774nd he himself pits the : bearing of sifferina , „Ak.What, in, any case, * - AtATO*7•9 6 hBAY B PPr!)49/ itmf°, Yoil,?leil f iNFld4t?i b e .trt.toll44 the Prine-i* 1 1 0i9ht w°9lfLOh9w),the e:9 ll TkootiO 3 ,9ny, 9aso.A4weeP s4er.i,ng an 4, t 49 N ivinp f avc i m, might expliis all thelesaential i princi r plea end, remove material ; difficulties in the doctrine, of 4,9 *r: Barnes, after, 14049 g a i'llgfeoPlE4f9 statement nature , of - theAtonementAnd,oneensivering Ott*: demands ; of SPriiPt9r.l3tlPaZiA,l' out. of Te4lll - the necessary limits , . of., hunan knowledge and &,.ftense.of the danger; in theology; of, pres ling 'beyond • them. , , Ithrndilemma in whinkTrof.,flodge is placed, that inaking the sifferingS of a pnrfectry-isia lesi infinitely holy, tking l ' i "preciseli the voorlevaity avoided ;in ; a way ,to, -separate him. wiflely. *ni. Barnes land :cnit , i selves., It is here that the eoniet , appears again' aiitiiiBvlt6iii the suitt'vitli which it` ileiria4 to 1)404, q nd sweeps ;rush ;into` the -.regions 91: a choerless high !‘,orthodnx.y.." We shall- try-.. to follo w it telescopically , riez,t lIIIPEACIIM644I I ltlii enori-ei gre:l,..,Atience tituit forbearance of tii6;it th y-ni nth agrfortieth COngr&s 4n - drew Johnson is exhausted. Far nearly:three years he :has been taking the part, of the subdued rebellion, add -has been laboring to < nullify its overthro*. There has, perhaps, always in that time, been a large majority in Ciingre;33 who be lievecl his impeachment justifiable -an4 . desirable; but it was felt to be such a.serious matter, and so , many ether interests demanded Llegislation,,that it' *as on the *hole thought beat to tolerate Mr. JOlilison as the leaS evil - of the two. Over 'and • • over again we have been ,amazed at this Yorpear ance. Over and over we have suppressed, our indignation anddeelined to agitatethe matter iii' our noluinali", because we supposed good land true men in Congress, feeling just as 'we did 4 and knowing vasty, more, ,Might and ought to be trustedentirely with the decision °tip graye and so >, unprecedented. a matter. Yet look et a hasty summary'of the'acts of this , extraordinary man, anyone of *ILI almost would seem to cOil taia matter of formal indictment ,He was scandalously, and infarnously• intox icated when sworn into the office. of Vice Presi dent; ktiiltiOf the attempeto bring back rebel ascendency in the South, aa,it existed before the War, and, of hindering with all, his - might. arestor ation on the principle that the rebellion had failed and loyalty and'justice bad triumphed.. ' has planted himself Obstinatelyr in the way 'of the national progress in, the line of justice and equality to all men, and has labored with all might to cherish and strengthen the pre ttdice of race and color. lle" made loud professions of .xtreme radical• ism in, order to, gain the rtunity,to betray the . • loyal oause. • . _ ' •He is guilty okitirse than treason in the at tempt, whir been the ruling principle of his , office, to m e treason honorable and loyalty dis r gra ...., 'never attempted to bring to justice a single traitor as'such; but am o ng earliest acts was to pardon unrepentant rebels in multitudes. He has pardoned alarming, numbers of high criminals; as counterfeiters and mail robbers; he has made ,the forms of justice a mockery, in one instance, inWhich the accused had the President's pardon in his pocket when brought to the bar for - trial. He,has dispensed pardons through .prostitutes and the vilest characters. • Hellas removed men from office for no other reason han that they were too loyal for his pur poses, and too zealous to execute the laws, which he Was,,determined to override. When he dared not violate the law himself, he has sought to cor rupt the highest officials in the army, and make them tools of his purposes. He has put such cOsiturefivf his, into the, revenue service, that the , . . fiery dude hig.becOrtte a scandal, and corruption and freifd,;have.'grOirn into a science, and whisky rings are compounding felonies, enriching them selves, _ beggaring , the treasury, and • breaking down the national credit; and actually threatening thi3 gountry With an entire pplitical regime based upon the . interests .bf, 'the fraudulent" whis dealerj3:• •' He is guilty of The New drleang massacre, of theMeinphis riots, of the tit)" thousand -unpun ished inurders of loyal whites and'blicks in Texas, since the-war, an d' o r . th e 'countless ;unpunishe d outrages which have only been partially Checked in the,Bouth by. the_ Congressional 'Plan of Rcr *bits: :ffliffed Oiknirea;',vrith the loWest bar ;oio d`epitfiets. He has disgraced 1 4 8 high tiffice haranguing noisy ietiowdsoillloVer.the.cotuatty, in a state of intoxi dailotipindinl thei übe Ofplanguagerso .! scandalous iiiiil)ra.4hiSinciiiiitliatintsiiiielition!had be'plead 01t...z.v% ; i as -a He haspnt.such deep dishonor upon the Pres idefitial. office •-by hi& personalliabits and , tion ehanaotdr as it has=neversuffered-before. fOeeeney never , clitilbed'io high in all our tory, and no respectable but will feel re!. lieved when Andrew Johnson slinks back idio merited obsetirty`• „-r All this and rmuch : more has leen submitted to by an immense' , majority' Cetigress, with a pa tienee.whichonly eAnalleo:that of the people in the •fall andlvinter of 18(0 and '6l,,when: State after State werit of secession, -and <battery after battery was erected around, Fort Sunitee, and , when the relnctant, , e.ridurink, loyal peonlehYnitit s ck fidui those'juit measurgi'Of-re preaSioniwhieh they`might have 'Jaen. tidy vraited,leng, and long opportunity ; : was ,given to the Southto undo their rriad acts, and escape the fou't ; years of horror and Toverthiow Which. fol lowed! ''The loyalpeeple,-woUld not act until the * South compelled them t 9, Congress, too, has ' given Johnson every chance to amend his record-and live out his term in peace. But he them to impeachment , at last by his oWnblind, mad, obstinaey. has , given - that technical , form. to his treason that 'both enables. and cbmpeis them, reluctant as they are, ,to this 'act. He has openly defied the plain letter of the He hts rushed upon his doom. We believe it 'Will speedily be accomplighed.. l We thank ‘ qoa not only for the firm spirit of the EU:Me; but for the noble attitude and unshaken loyalty of the leading officers in the army, from the Lieutenant General, to Sheridan and Sickles, 'to Sherman' and Thomas and Meade. We are MEI .thankful for the itarierturbable coolness and firm ness and discreetness of the Secretary of War himself And we rejoice in the noble words of sYmpathy•flaShed from the Capital of our State, by that true soldier, patriot and Christian, GOv ernor Geary. There will be no military demon strations. Mr.:Johnsonwill go quietly and _ig *ominously Wills , home, -declared ineligible for any office in the" United States, and none will more thoroughly ignore and repudiate him than whose behalf alr'his great crimes were committed. AFFAIRS AT THE CAtITAL • WAsuirropu, February 24, 1868, wrote!you a week ago,:that impeachment had been killea again, and pen little dreamed that we werabn the eve of;anrexcitement on that very sub ject; auch-as r haisnot been felt since the assassination aftehinolhx. - But impeachment has come again, and is `'time . has cOnie to 'stay - till`Andrew Johnso n ceases to be President of the United States. The - conclusion seems foregone, and is looked upon by every one as a certainty.. The issue is a clear and simple one. The President/in , defiance of a law, passed over, his veto, and recognized as a law by him himself in his, previous suspension of Secretary Stan ton and the assignment of reasons therefor, has re moved Mr. Stanton during a session of Congress, and appointed his successor. The view taken of this act by the Senate, which:is to sit as the jury in his trial, may be inferred from the passage of the law itself last summer by more than a two-thirds vote, by the .restoration of Mr: Stanton to his place after his sus pension, and by the resolution of Friday, declaring this new act without authority of law, by a vote of more than fouito one. The Senators abstain, as in duty bound, from expressions outside, but it is well known that the resolution of Friday commanded the vote of the best lawyers of that body : Trumbull, Fessenden and Conkling., No one present in the House on Saturday, when the resolution was presented to impeach the President" for high crimes and misdemeanors" could question the cer tainty that a bill would be carried to the Senate. The resolution -was signed by all the Republican members of the Reconstruction Committee, even by those who have ridiculed the possibility of such a step, and Was advocated, with great force, by the two most conservative Republicans -Spalding and Bing ham. The speech of Judge Spalding was listened to with marked attention, and was regarded as assu ring the vote. He referred, with . great feeling, to his past course in the matter, and the full determina tion he had, had to resist every such measure; but declared that his conviction now was, that:so long as ~Congress Submitted to having its laws traMpled upon Genesee Evangelist, No. 1136. Ministers $2.50 H. Miss. $2.00 ( Address :—.1334 Chestnut Street. the couno-,j could not have peace, and he, therefore, hoped that this resolution would be acted upon with dispatch and unanimity. James Brooks was the champion of the President, but weakened the cause by his wild and extravagant threats. He had been in consultation with Judge Woodward and Senator Bucksle*, and had made a diligent use of law books up to the time of taking the floor, but, in his speech, seemed to be ,more under the inspiration of such spirits as Henry - Clay Dean or Brick Pomeroy. His protestations that he_." never, never, : never would sub mit,"-,and threats that " the thousands and tens of thbuSan&s t end df Democrats" would- rise in their Might, we received with derisive laughter. He was'pale with excitement, and looked, after he sat .down and considered more coolly what he had said; ashamed of himself. The defence of the Presi dent has been very weak, and has revealed the fact. that this act has taken the Democrats as Much by surprise as it did the RepubliCans, that it is indefen iblS, and that they are'imit 'willing to' assume the responsibility of it. One of the best lawyers on that side adinitted all this in a conversation on Saturday. Somtpf them are,very angry, and declare, that. this one 'thing ha§ t i lardwil the-Odi:iffy into the hands of the sx 'ttenieltadicals and confirmed every position they.have taken.- .One: thing is quite evident, the most quiet and assure& men here now are such men as Stevens,BoutiVell,'llogan, Kslly, Sumner;BUtler, Wade and Morton. 4 :- 7 The scene in the House when, the resolution was presented on Sahaday - will be a memorable one to all who were permitted to witness' it. Almost every mernlier Was!•in. his 'place, Senators and other dis tinguished men„crowded the lobbies, from the gal leries three thousand'people'looked down with eager eipe r ctation,while hundreds-in the halls, goaded on by,t,exaggerate&,rumors' of what was transpiring wwithin , pressed upon each other at the doorways. The regular:boSiness was droning along dri Commit tee 'oriWe' Whole when Thaddeus Stevens entered and laid twolhin payiers on his desk. ' It is felt that the hour looked for has come at last, the Commit tee rises, the Speaker Assumes his place, announces ..therules of the House with respect to demonstra tions of applause or disapprobation, and. gives the floonto,the "gentleman from .Pennsylvania." I Mr. Steiena, Pale and very feeble,' takes the floor, while in hreathless Silence all wait to hear his words. He 'announces a brief repcirt and a resolution from the .Re:cdnstrtictiton'Comtnittee, which he sends to the Clerk to be'read ; 'these he' submits to the House .witheut debate reserving the right to express his views before the vote is taken. Then follows the debate of which I have Spoken, and towards the close or 'the afternoon the test of 'the - spirit of the "House` is made in the attehipt to fix the tinae for a vote on the resolution. It is found that all dilatory motions, objections and fillibustelings areas "green withs," to that determination which presses straight. to the , conclusion of the 'hatter, and by unanimous copeent it is decided, that after debate through Sat urdayevenin o'clock and _Monday, the vote shall be taken at five on the latter day. - This first scene foreahadows the end; the President, for some unac eountable reason, has persisted in butting his head against the wall and'at last he has - destroyed him- Meantime, Mr. Stanton holds his place and has not left the War Office day or night, while Adjutant Gen. Thomas,- who has filled the air with noisy Alireits that he would take possession by force, is arrested" and put under $15,000 bonds to appear in Court next• Wednesday to • answer for the violation of law in Ottempting to assume the Office of Secre tary of. War, and the War Department is guarded by. soldiers. • The Presiderdcontinues-his garrulous talks with newspaper correspendents in which he appears very valiant, but his acts do not follow up and support the defiant rornoval of Mr. Stanton. It may be that the reply of Gen. George Thomas to the nomination to the place offered to Sherman' a week ago declin ing the honor, or the reply of Gen. Emory in com mand of the District, "You cannot use me," or the attitude of Congress, or the telegrams to Congress 'fro& Governors Ogelsby and . Geary promising sup. 'port, or the failure to make a favorable impression upon' the Democratic NOrninating, Committee now here, or the fact that none of "the thousands and tens of thousands, promised by Mr. Brooks, except Alderman McMullen of the Fourth Ward of Philadelphia, seem; ready . to "•come in their might" —it may be that some one or all of these reasons have influenced the President in sending in the name of Thomas Ewing, of Ohio, to be Secretary of War, and in claiming that his intention has only been to gain possession of the port folio of War by civil process. 4P7 1 As I write, Mr. Stevens is closing the 'debate in the House. Members leave their seats and flock around him. By many it is felt that this may be his last speech, so feeble does he appear, and his words fall with great solemnity on all. At once when he closes, the vote is taken and the Articles or Impeachment are Bent to the Senate, only forty seven [the correspondent writes 42 on the exterior of, his, envelope,]: in an unusually full house, voting against them.: To-morrow the time for trial will be set, and the President cited to ,appear. If it be done "'twere well that it be done quickly." FENWICK. ear The. N. Y. Independent of last week has an editorial on " Public Obscenity," truthful, and earnest in spirit ; but, alas for consistency I it gives in the very same number a "full page il lustration" of the sin it denotinces in the shape of au advertisement . of the vilest qua k nostrum known to the public. The whole page is covered with abominable details of the uses of this medi:- stsr The following of our exchanges have pub lished the Round Table's item from the London Ath,enauon, but take no notice of Dr. March's crushing reply to the charge :—The North,-West ern Presbyterian, of Chicago; the Western Pres byterian, of Louisville; the Central Presbyterian, of-,Richmond, and the Christian Intelligencer. We beg leave to refer these papers to our first page - of Feb. 16th, to the N. Y. Nation of Feb. sth, to the Independent of last week and to Dr. .March's letter in the Round Table its. The forthcoming number of Child's Literary Ga zette will add another to .the numerous exposes of this baseleas slander.'
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers