THE AIERICAN .A.„„ GENESEE EVANGELIST. A ge] /tie as and Family Newspaper, Of TEM INTZSZEIT OP TIM Gonstitational Presbyterian Church. PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY, " AT THE P4SIIVEALAN :001.1SE, 1334 Chestnut Street, (24 stern) Philadelphia. Env, John W. Mears. Editor and PnblishOr. gistritan THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 1866 ILLUSTRATIONS OF HUMAN NATURE Ir rUE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE TRIAL AND DEATH OF CHRIST. If we contemplate the group of 'immi nent figures gathered around the. suffering Saviour, and study their conduct, we shall gain other instructive views of human na ture. The multitude' crying a Hosanna" on the Sabbath, and Crucify Him," with equal vehemence, on Friday, has long ago become a proverb for the fickleness of the populace, under the manipulation of a popular demagogue or of scruling class, in the direction of their lower passions. The re conciliation of -Pilate and Herod is the world-wide type of the readiness of wicked men to sink personal 'enmities, when they find themselves in some common enterprise against the , good. Whether the proverb of " Pilate and Herod becoming friends," from sympathetic opposition to Christ, is founded upon a strictly accurate view of the facts, may be questioned ; since the object. of Pilate in sending his prisoner to Herod was pretty clearly to get rid of an unwel come responsibility,thrust upon him by the Sanhedrim, and to avoid putting to death a man whom he regarded as innocent. Still, the popular instinct may be justified as having seized upon the broad and gene ral fact that Pilate and Herod, in the transactions leading to the death of Christ, to which both assented, were made friends. And the general truth that the fury of the bad against goodness, in its highest mani festations, is such as to consume their mu tual hatreds and reconcile their bitterest fends, is nowhere more clearly illustrated than in this wild combination of elements against Christ. Here is the proud Jewish priest crouching before a hated Gentile governor, sinking his despite and covering up his seditious wrath against Romish power, in order that he may use that power to destroy the Messiah, whom ''he much more doeply hates; here is the conquering Roman consenting to be made the tool of the most despised people in the imperial dominions, lending his victorious cohorts to do their bidding; here are Sadducees and Pharisees, forgetting their fierce party quarrels, and making common cause in their envious assault upon the teacher of Nazareth ; here are• the Roman soldiers fraternizing with the seditibus rabble' of Jerusalem, whom they were ever ready to curb with bloody 'violence, and hastening to gratify a spite in which they could not share, upon an innocent captive ; "For of a truth," says the apostle, "against thy Holy Child Jesus whom thou hest anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the people of Israel, were gathered together." And more' astonishing than all, it is,re served. to theirltiMaie circle of the Apos tles themselves to furnish the most detesta ble of all the agents ,in the transaction— Judas the Traitor, One of the Twelve plays into the hands of the murderous priests. Thus the scene is completed. And we have a combination of heterogeneous and mutually repellent elements in the re jection and crucifixion of the world's Re deemer, which we may safely put at the head of all the skilful plots of Satan, or of bad men, to array the evil powers of the world against the truth. Yet it is an event of typical significance. The world's history is full of such combina tions against the truth. Very lately in our own city, and in the capital of the State, men of the most hostile political sentiments have been confederated in a common , effort to overthrow the legislative enactments of our State, in support of Sabbath observance. And men calling themselves Christians have been found not loth to render traitor-' ous assistance in these efforts. Bigoted Irish Catholics, and equally' 'bigoted Ger man infidels; radical Republicans, and equally radical Democrats, have joined hands in this unholy crusade. Party feuds of the bitterest' chaiacter, jealoiiiies of race and religion are laid aside =in this demon stration against the Fourth Command ment. So heterogeneous was the combination Which rose against the people of. God in the days of the good King Jehoshitphat. The Psalmist has described it in sucivim pressive language as this : " For lo ! thine enemies make a tumult and they that hate thee have lifted up tie had. They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. They hive consulted to gether with one consent; they are confed erate against thee. The tabernacles of Edom and the Ishmadites ; of Moab and the Ragarenes; Gebal and Ammon arid Ama- New Series, Vol„ No. lek ; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre;, Amur (Assyria) is joined with ,them; they have holpen the children of Recent European histOry furnishes the illustration of the Holy Alliance. In this celebrated political combination, all the leading sovereigns of the civilized world were united to suppress revolutions, and to maintain, at all hazards, the political status of Europe. The nidely despotic Czar of Russia; Francis 11. of Austria, father-in laW of Napoleon; Frederick William .of Prussia; Louis XVIII , the new king of. France, and George 111. of England, fol lowed by almost .all the crowned heads of Europe, Greek, Romanist, and Protestant, jnined in this leagne—one of the most dangerous plots against popular liberty in the annals of history; what Arnold would have called "a royal rebellion against so ciety." They propounded the principle of armed intervention, or forcible interfer ence in the affairs of nations, when con ducted in a way deemed unfavorable to the interests of despotism; and they carried out the principle in violently suppressing popular movements in Naples, Spain and, Portugal. It was against the possible ex tension of the influence of this tyrannical league to this continent that President Monroe, in 1825, uttered the famous de olaiation, since known as the MONROE DOCTRINE. It was. to the yet powerful remnants of this league that the final sup pression of the great uprising of 1848 was due. And in the later combinations against the kingdom of Christ, we see refined infi delity joining hands with gross superstition; we see materialism arrayed with transcen dentalism; the. worldly-minded consorting with the men of Science and of letters; the despots, joining with the revolutionists; the openly godless and heathen with Phari sees and hypocrites, with false men and mercenaries, wounding the Savionr in the house of his friends. COLENBO IN THE HOUSE OF CONVO CATION. The case of this ex-Bishop, whose persis tence is worthy of a better cause, came be fore the Upper House of the' Convocation of Canterbury, June 28. The same want of evangelical frankness and decision which we have noticed is their action o; other questions of vital , concern to the Church, characterized ,their conclusions on this mat- . ter, so seriously involving the orthodoxy, not to say the very Christianity of the body. It cannot be accepted as anything other than an indication , of a melancholk degree'of degeneracy and .corruption, when:. the dignitaries of a professed Evangelical Church hesitate, as to the, nature of their relations with so notorious an infidel ae the ex-Bishop of Natal. It appears that the orthodox Dean of Maritzburg had, on behalf of the Bishop of Capetown, written to , ask their lordships' whether the Church . of England held oOm-. munion with Dr. Colenso and the heretical church he , was attempting to establish in Natal, or with the orthodox bishops in Synod who bad excommunicated him. The following very unsatisfactory conclu sion was reached, and sent as the reply of Convocation, viz.: 4 g That the Church of England is in communion with the bishops who excommunicated. Dr. Colenso, but whether she is also in communion with that prelate himself their lordships declitied to determine." Four bishops, Oxford, Salis ,bury, Gloucester and Bristol, and Bangor, desired to , say she was not„ but five, includ ing the Bishops , of London, Lincoln, Ely, St. 'David's, and ,LAhfield, were for reti cence on so difficult a point. In thecourse of the discusion, the Bishop of Lichfield said a friend of his, a High , -Churchman, had recently gone toi Natal, and wrote to say that Bishop Colenso's Aura. was always crowded when he preached, and that the, Bishop himself was held in great re spect." The next day, action was taken on, the question proposed by the Bishop of Cape (town: "Whether, the aecptance of a new bishop on his part,,whilst Dr. Coleoso still retains the letters patent of the Crown, will in' any way separate from him and his diocese the Mother Church." In the - following answer, proposed by the Bishop of Oxford, and adopted by a vote of 6 to 4, we have a fine, specimen of eva sion. The decision referred to in the first part of the answer would seem to make any ariswer.superfluousr; while the proviso No. 2 seems to be nothing but a restate mentoof the whole question. "That as it has been decided on `appeal to the highest judicial court in this king on the one hand, that the Church in the province of Natal on communion with the United Church of England and Ireland, is, in the eye of the law, a mere voluntary as- PHILADELPHIA, THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 1866. sociation ; and on the other hand, as the let ters patent do not profess to convey spiritual power, and have been declared' by the court to convey no episcopal jurisdiction, it is the judgment of this House that the acceptance of a new bishop does not impair. the connec tion or alter the relations existing, between the members of the Church in the province of Natal and the Church of England, provid ed, 1. That the bishop be panonically • conse crated according to the use of the Church of England; 2. That there be noinvasion of the title of the bishop of Natal conveyed by her Majesty's letters patent.!' In this reply, the metropolitan is told that .he never had any official connection with: the Mother Church; and supposing he had, be must not invade gle tide' giVen by . the Queen's-letters-patent to Coletiso, in putting another bishop in his place. • Sun beams may as soon be extracted from cucumbers, as counsel and encouragement' from' this action. of Convocation, by the South African defenderbfsthe , faith of the `Reformed Church of England. The minority in this vote - showed most undisguisedly their sympathy with Colenso. The ,Bishop of London said they were very much in the dark as to the state of ecclesias-. tical affairs in Natal. The Bishop of Lich= field had told them that Bishop Colenso 's church was crowded, while the Bishop of Oxford had stated, from information that had reached him,, that only infidels and persons hostile to the 'Church attended. He would remind their lordships that Pr. Colenso had claimed to be tried, and that he had not been tried. If there were a trial, and Dr. Colenso were acquitted, where would be the Bishop of Maritzburg? Or, if he retracted, no sentence. I could' be passed. If Dr. Colenso were con demned, the persons entitled to elect a suc cessor would claim that right, and where would be, the Bishop •of Maritzburg? He would necessarily be looked upon as an in truder. At present the legal authorities in the colony recognized the Bishop of Natal, and the Secretary of State had given direc tions that there should be such a.recognition. The Bishops of St. David's and Lichfield considered the appointment of a second bishop would be unlawful, highly inexpedi ent, and mischievous. Bishop Colenso had never been tried, for the pretended trial was utterly null and void in law, in reason and in _ _ _ The Archbishop of Canterbury said he did not think the resolution was an encourage ment to the Church in Africa to elect a new bishop. If he had interpreted it in that way, he would not have supported it. The Lower House had .been discussing the same subject, when the action of the Upper House was reported and agreed to` by the former. Miring the discussion in the Lower House, we are informed that the inevitable Dean Stanley saw many dif ficulties in discussing, this question. The very reverend gentleman, in the course of a speech which occupied :between three and four hours in delivery, entered fully into the legal and theological bearings of the case, and- called upon • the House not to' pro nounce against a painstaking Christian scholar like the Bishop -of Natal without -previous consideration.' .Such halting, half-hearted:officials have charge of the 'vital interests - et •the Church oft England, while popery,:on the one hand, and infidelity, on • the 'other, -are raging acrainst her and threatening^ to divide her once fair . heritage between them. It is a • .1 dark prospect, 'arid - "one calling for martyr firmness on the, part, of the friends ot the truth in her, communion. RIIMII4ATION OF AUSTRIA. The ancient House of Hapsburg, which fur six hundred years has exercised a pow erful influence in the heart of Europe, and for two hundred and fifty years has been the champion of the Papacy and the dread of the friends of human progress, " pre senting an example which stands atone in history of the manner in which violence and tyranny can check the progress of civ ilization," has been brought to the very verge of ruin in a campaign of a fortnight. It had gathered immense armies, and relied confidently on their prowess and itumberS, for an' easy victory over the Pru 6 -, sians and Itaßani. Its calculations did not seeem to.include the possibility of defeat. Written instructions had been issued to, govern the conduct of the Anitrian soldiers in the enemy's country. The Prussians, hairassed on every aide by contingents of the various hostile States,' were to be crowded back, step by step, to the very wails of Berlin. Benedek's tactics, if he had any, seemed to be swayed by contempt of the Prussians. Readily did the people' believe those utterly false versions of the battles of Sachod and S,tralitz, which repre sented•theta as Austrian ,victories. Only when the irreparable disaster of Koniggratz was announced, did king and people wake 'on ' a sudden from their dream of victory, to behold themselves on the point of na tional annihilation.' Then, like a dishoneat bankrupt, wishing to:save something from the impending wreck and to bribe to his interests the ex pected r e f eree in , the final settlement, the Epperor makes over to France the splendid province of Venitia. He relinquishekthe only territory on which his Aims had been victorious. He abandons the very posies siona, the cession of ' which be would not suffer to be discussed. in the uegotiations previous to the outbreak of hostilities. What an extreme of wretchednees, what :depths of ill-concealed mortification, are revealed in this attempt tb secure the intervention of France, which, after all, proved' a fail ure ! How crushing the announcement that France desired that Austria should be sustained among the leading powers of Europe ! " leadieg power" that needed to be "sustained" Rather• has the Pres tige of France , and the. factitious .interna- tional influence of her ad*entitrer' ruler been 40i9 before tite .'amazing energy and resettAl The''Prnesian minieter,to-day is the - true arbiter of the destiniefi of Europe France, finding it prudent to retreat from its prOndly assumed attitude of medi- ator, the Holise of Hapsburg now finds itself absolutely friendless among the nations .of Europe, and defenceless before the ad- vancing legions of Bismark, armed with that terrible weapon, the' needle•gun. It is a solemn and an instructive scene, such as history occasionally discloses when record ing the slow but sure judgments of a just Ged. The House of Hapsburg stands trembling in the presence of an awful Ne mesis. The bloody persecutor and des troyer of Protestantism in Bohemia and Moravia is crushed by a Protestant power on the plains of Bohemia and Moravia. The' fields which were watered with Pro testant blood two centuries. and a half ago, are now thick sown will • tle fresh gravei of Austrian' soldiers. And what now is the last resort, the for• lorn hope of this vanquished Emperor, for whom Vienna was lost at Koniggratz ? If he cannot conclude a peace with Prussia, to whom shall he turn, to whom confide, in a last convulsive struggle for mere self preservation ? What shall be the true and loyal centre where he may.gather the rem nants of his beaten army, mend his wasted finances, and draw comfort and energy from fresh exhibitions of the attachment of his subjects? The world may know the des- Terater condition of the affairs of Francis 'Tose* when, t reads his appeal to hid faithful subjects, of Hungary. •Yes 1 it is to oppressed, betrayed; crushed Hungary that the representative of Hungary's op pressors and betrayers, for centuries, is com pelled to turn. Francis Joseph, having no place where to lay his imperial head, begs fOr shelter in the land of Kossuth and Klapia, and calls upon the sons and broth er's :of the victims 0f.1848, to aid in saving from imminent destruotion the power, which the - blood of their kindred, eighteen years be fore was vainly shed to overthrow. An Eng lish Correspondent of the Tribune compares thi4 appeal of Francis Josef& to that which King:James IV. of England is said to`have addreised, in his 'extreme appre4eitsion and hespair, to the old Earl of Bedford, whose difot JreAad injured so terribly, only ,a £lllO'it 'die before. In a paroxysm offatuity he asked the father of the murdered Lord Ru6ell whether he 'would not stand by him ? " There 'was a time," said the aged noble, "for I had once a son who might haie served your majesty on this occasion." The heart of James sank under the bitter ness of the reproach, as he silently turned away; like the first great criminal, he felt that his punishment was greater than he could bear. Thus, if Hungary is not free, she is not unavenged. And if Austria still nominally governs, Hungary may yet be come the ruling member .of the imperial confederacy. " Peace doubtless has been proclaimed'be twcen the contending powers; though at this writing,•the eiact'terms are unknown. nrqu'esiionably; Austria loses the remnant of her possessions in Italy, and is expelled from the Germanic confederation. The spirit of revolt has been widely spread in Sontherri gungary, and the end may not be yet. But the result -is such as to strengthen confidence in the value of jus tice as a principle of national policy, and in the final triumph of the just and liberal principles of Protestantism among the ua tions of the earth. - REPRESENTATIVE MEN. The queetionds asked by brethren of the other branch, whether Mr. Barnes . is the representative theologian of " the ,New School." They say, too, that thia,is a time for candor; on our part, we are equally ttitirse'ito disguise. ' , Our answer then, to their inquiry would-be, that while the Latin motto IVidlius addictus, etc., may be justly applied to our - branch of the Church, Mr. Barnes, in our opinion, more nearly prosehes the , position, among us of a fepre , 3cE itative. man, in., his theological upinions and ( spirit, than , any other,prominent per solo %INor, - on - 'lciokint. over the , various j ec ding denominations of our country; 'oar' Genesee Evangelist, No. 1055. we indicate a man who holds a relation so nearly representative in his Church, as Mr. Barnes does in ours. And we may add that, in our judgment, there is no surer way to kill the whole scheme of Reunion, than to intimate the necessity of discrediting the theological works of Mr. Barnes ipa preliminary or as a probable sequence of the movement. The ostracism of Albert Barnes ! We doubt whether the quorum of a single Presbytery would vote for union on such a basis. TEE NEW ORLEANS RIOT& Befbre; the dreadful sensations aroused by the Memphis riots have passed away, the nation is startled by disorders in an other city, which are not only quite as criminal, and not only reveal an equally desperate rebel purpose in the perpetrators, but which throw a fearful light upon the attitude of the President, and furnish tke last proof of his sympathy, with the pro .slavery and rebel element of the South. A State Convention, reassembled on its own adjournment under the authority of the government of the State, composed of the advanced loyal men of the State, and believed to be in favor of ratifying the Constitutional Amendment and of qualified negro suffrage, are threatened in advance by the rebel mayor, John T. Monroe, of New Orleans. The President is appealed to, and replies, through rebel agents, that the military must support the civil authori ties. Governor Wells is ignored, and the President's communications are with the rebel city officials and with the Attorney General Herron, once in the rebel army. To this rebel general the United States officers in the city are referred for direc- tions. The Convention and the freedmen are left at the mercy of the New Orleans mob, headed, as at Memphis, by the police, who are principally returned rebel soldiers. The Ciinvention is ignominiously broken up and its members are fugitives, prisoners, dying or dead men. The governor of the State is among , the missing. The mob holds sway for several hours, and when it has accomplished its work, .the ipilitary ap pears and assumes control of the city. The arrested members of the Convention were released, but the civil authorities re arrested them, and no doubt , will try to show us, id the penalties they-inflict upon them, what they think of treason against themselves. We do not believe any considerable por tion of the Northern people is in the slightest doubt- as to the true animus of this movement. They see in it an attack upon free speech and upon the principles of republicanism, precisely such as would have been excite'd by. a convention for such objects in 1860. They 'recognize here the came mob which Gen. Butler cowed in 1862. They, recall the name of the same insolent mayor, John T. Monroe, whom Gen. Butler deservedly banished to Fort Jackson for his rampant disloyalty. And they are compelled, against their will and with unfeigned horror, to see the. President in thorough accord with these untamed rebels, and actually putting the military power which conquered them, -at their control. It is of no use to disguise it, the President has taken sides with—has armed the ferocious rebel mob of New Orleans, and has, by these his agents, trampled on loyalty, suspended free speech, suspended a loyal State government, and given up the frinds of impartial suffrage to the mur derous violence of the thugs of New Orleans. We are driven to this overwhelming conclusion in regard to the PrAident. ' His apparent inconsistencies 'are only to be re conciled on the theory of a decided rebel proclivity. He is in favor of State recon struction only in cases where ex-rebels are in power. He is • very respectful of State rights where • States are firmly in the hands of secessionists. But in Tennessee, where loyal men have the ascendency, he and his friends threw=obstacles in the way of State legislation'tending to , secure that-ascen dency in the State, and its recognition by the national Congress. In Missouri, he has promised something very much 'like mili tary" protection for rebels desiring to vote. And now, in Louisiana, he ignores the loyal governor, interferes inL the internal government of the State,• and points the troops to the.disloyal.Attorney General for directions—all in accordance with the wishes of rebels, and because, otherwise, thoroughly loyal men would make progress in moulding "the policy of the State. To such monstrous nets, and to the direful tendency of such a policy, no amount, of Executive patronage and no degree of plausibility in the,speech of renegade repub licans•of the Dixon, Doolittle and Raymond stamp, can blind the eyes of the people These riots are touch-stones of Executive "1 1 n 3f 8 Per annum, in advance: $y Mail; Si. Ey Carrier, Si SO. Fitly cent. additional, after three months. Clubs. —Ten or more Papers sent to one address, payable strictly iv advance and in one remittance. By Mail. $2 50 per SIIIIIIIIM. BY Carrier.t3 per annum. Ministers and Mtaisters' Widows, $2 50 in advance. Home Missionaries, $2 00 in adva nce . Remittances by mail are at our risk Postage.—Five cents quarterly. in advance. Paid by subscribers at the office of delivery. Advertisements.-1254 cents per line 'for the first, and 10 cents for the second insertion. One Square (ten lines) one month ..• two months. three months 7 sir months 12 one year 18 he following discount on long advertisementa.i sated for three months and upwards. is allowed:— Over 20 lines. 10 per cent. off; over 50 lines. 20 cent.; over 100 lines. 33% per cent. character, and the murdered men of Mem phis and New Orleans are martyrs, whose blood will not cry in vain to a just God foi vengeance, or to an indignant people to renewed and an unmistakable disavowal the principles and the men who are respon sible for them. DR. E. P. HUMPHREY ON UNION. Dr. E. P. Humphrey, of. the Louisville Presbytery of the other branch, in the course of an address to that body, designed to conciliate and disarm opposition to the attitude of their Assembly at St. Louis, thus explains away the action of that As sembly on Reunion.. Dr. Humphrey was present and officiated at the joint commu nion services, and the strain of his remarks td his Presbytery is calculated to excite surprise. It would scarcely, however, be fair to consider him .as representing more than a moiety of his church. Dr Ham- phrey says : I will now go on and examine some of the collateral issues proposed by our brethren of the other side. They say for example, that our Church is rushing into the embrace of the New School Church ; and the proof is that the last Assembly appointed a committee of fifteen, directing them to confer with a similar committee from the New School upon the subject of an organic union of the two.. This is true—but one other thing is true within my own personal knowledge. The members of the Assembly who are inflexibly opposed to this "clandestine marriage," as Dr. R. J. Breckiniidge calls it—these mem bers agreed to the appointment of this com mittee under the expectation of defeating the whole thing by that appointment. We were fully persuaded that when this committee shall look closely into the matter they will find, and the whole Church will find, that the union proposed is impossible. It is my own thorough conviction that on the report of the committee, the matter will be, in effect, in definitely postponed, that we shall best reach this result through this fair and equitable method of dealing with the subject. WORK FOR EDUCATED MEN AND WOMEN. The following article, from the Presbyterian. Monthly for August, is commended to the attention of educated men and women in the Church. We trust it will meet with such a response as greatly to enlarge the efficiency of our Publication Committee:— Among our fifteen hundred ministers, are there not some who could make themselves useful in writing for the young, beyond the half-dozen or so who are now doing something in that,,way ? We are sure that there are, and we ask them to take the matter to heart. Purchasers seek new books, booksellers de mand new books, and publishers must issue new books, or be left astern by more energetic competitors. The result is, that many infe rior new books are issued to meet the' popu lar demand. Though poor, even worthless, they are published because they will sell. If we could, we would change this condition of affairs, and make the good old books more popular than trashy new books; but this we cannot do. This being so,. we earnestly de sire', good new books. for publication by our Committee: Poor books we are not willing to issue. We cannot afford to lose the char acter for excellence which our works for the young have gained. On the other hand, we cannot refuse to publish, for this will drive our!friends to less scrupulous publishers for their books for the family and Sunday-school library. And is there any reason why there should not be books at once valuable and interesting prepared for the press? Must publishers be shut up to a small number of professed writers for the young, who, it may be, have long since used up all their available stock of ideas? We think not. Among the educated men in our ministry, and the well cultivated women in our churches, there are those fully competent to this duty. "But it will involve labor I" Of course it. will. And what good work 'does not involve labor? Is it not the duty of those qualified for the task to prepare wholesome mental food for the youth, even if. it does cost au expenditure of time and brain? The ques tion answers itself, We would make a suggestion. Fiction has its proper place in literature, but no reason able person will deny that it now is excessive in amount. The vast majority of the books in our Sunday-school libraries are " story books." The demand of the scholars is for interesting story books," and story books they get, and often nothing but story books. Very wishy-washy story books many of them are, with a half ounce of truth to a peck of incident and small talk. But, even with good only, of this class, on our shelves, the pro portfon is excessive. We wish, therefore, to suggest that there' is room for a large num ber of volumes ora different class. Passages of history, lives of- eminent men,, our mission fields, Scripture story, facts within the range Of personal knoWledge, the works of God m nature, may be made the groundwork of books for the young, at Once instructive and eniertiining. Without excluding the illus tration of Muth, and the presentation of lessons of wisdom by parables, we would foster the production of works in which actual truth forms the substratum.' Yet, that the book is "true". will not make it available, unless the truth is rendered so attractive as to Secure a reading. We may add that fair oompeusation will be'made for mint/Scripts that are approved and published. They should -be sent to. the editor of, the Committee's Publications, Rev._ John W, Dulles, 'Presbyterian Liaise, delphis.
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers