ivu.i .a. I.i tiieat iiiitiau have begun to ultra t attention sucli as they Lave not received in a long time, sny.s Harold Frederic. Russia is raid to have crowded Eng land out of the tlowery kingdom; but it is hardly j ro. able. John Bull has planted his tic: ia that China shop, and it will re '.lire something mure than diploma y to remove him. The butchers and meat dealers of Berlin complain that $7,004,000 worth of meats were imported into Germany in 1896, prinei] ally from the United States and at prices with which they are unable to compete. They there fore petition the government to open the frontiers to the free importation of animals and meats from European countries, and to restrict by all prac ticable means the import of meats from Ameiicn, which is steadily in creasing from year to year. Even in the matter of apples the Yankees have seized the market, and last year there were lauded a" the single port of Hamburg before November 18, 64,- 538 barrels. In short, American com petition is now spoken of in Europe us the "transatlantic danger." Tlit, latest advices from Pekin brought new stories illustrating the arrogance of the Europoan govern ments in their treatment of China. Until recently all business with for eign nations was transacted at the isung-liyamen, and the members of the diplomatic corps visited that place almost daily whenever they had busi ness with the government. But the German minister compelled Weng Tnng Ho, Chung Yen Yuen and other members of the vameu to come to his legation for the purpose of discussing the demands of the kaiser's govern ment for indemn ty for the death of the Jesuit missionaries and other ma'ters relating to the occupation of Kiao-Chou. This is the first time such humilia'ien has ever been im posed. Two years fig ) a Kansas colony con sisting of about a dozen persons sold out all their property and set forth with the proceeds to the Holy Land, for the purpose of rebuilding Jerusa lem iu preparation for tho second coming of Chri i. The fund all told consisted of about SIO,OOO, and it must hive required faith as a grain of mustard seed to believe that sucli a sum would be sufficient to make the towers cf imperial Salem again rise crowueil uitli light and restore the 6pendors of Solomon's Temple. The experiment La 5 *, of coarse, turned out a failure, announces the New York Tribune, and the colonists are to re turn to Kansas, leaving Jerusalem to its natural processes of growth and decay, as. they ought to have done from the beginning. In starting life over again in the homes they aban doned they are not likely to find the experience acquired in their pious ex ile worth anything like the money it cost them. fays the Chicago Drovers' Journal: The ten leney to feed cattle and not raise them is growing more popular with the farmers of the middle west every year. This is a short cut quick returns, and save) about t" 0 years' time. Of course somebody lia3 to rai e 'he ?*??k cattle, but as this I art of the in 1 .st.y can bo cariied on more cheaply on the big ranches, farmers who rai e corn prefer to let them have a monopoly on the breed ing and raising end of it. The num ber of range cattle that are being fed oi corn e.vh winter is growing ra] idly. This fact is just r.s notice able with sheep as with cattle, for naturally the same conditions and Je suits obtain. The revised figures showing the ex tent of the Ameri an grain crop l'Or the past year have just been given out by the Unite 1 States department of agriculture. The acreage devoted to the six pri icipal cereals, viz.: corn, wheat, oats, iyq barley and buck wheat, aggregated 150.431,105 acres, while the total amount of grain pro duced aggregated 3,040,022,822 bush els. The value of the entire crop is estimated at $1,121,295,762. Iq de tail the figures showing the amount of each cereal produced, together with acreage aud valuation, are as follows: Acres. Bushel Value. Corn. 80,09,051 1.902,967,933 £ 501,072,932 Wheat, 89.463,063 C 39.141.16) 425.547.121 Oats, 25,730,375 631.767, VOJ 147,974,719 Rye. 1.703,561 27.313.331 12,239,640 Barley, 2,719.110 66.65.127 25,142.13 1 Buck wh 1717.936 14.937.451 0,319.138 Total, 1C0.431.105 3,040.922. t22 $1,121,295,762 While the figures represent but lit tle profit to the individual farmers B.attered over the Unite 1 States, they, nevertheless serve to indicate the sur passing magnitude of the country, which is capable of producing harvests in such abundance. VALID UL UOUi) LOADS. IMPORTANT FACTS FOR RURAL COM. MUNITIES TO CONSIDER. Conrliiftion* of I'rnfesoor Lutta of Purdue I'niversity, I milium, us to the Monetary Worth of Improved Highway a to Farm ers A Most Convincing Statement. The following paper upon "The alue of Good Loads to Farmers" was written by Professor Lattn of Purdue university, Indiana: That good roads have a money value to farmers will be granted by all. That the money value of improved highways is alone suffi cient to justify the cost of their con struction, will be confidentially claimed or readily admitted by many farmers, questioned by others, and denied by not .1 few. In view of the financial and many other advantages of good roads, a ma jority of the farmers of the state would, doubtless, favor their construction as rapidly as practicable under some ef ficient, economical anil equitable sys tem of highway improvement. But there is a considerable proportion of the farmers—doubtless one-fifth and possibly one-fourth—who have little knowledge or appreciation of the bene fits of good roads and who, therefore, object on account of the great cost of highway improvement. The farmers of this class know what they will have to bear their full share of the burden of such improvements; they discredit (not wholly without reason) the state ments and conclusions of many public writers as to the losses and gains to farmers from poor and good roads re spectively; hence they view with ap prehension the general agitation in favor of improved highways. Ignor ing or undervaluing the educational and social advantages, as well as the comfort aud enjoyment of good roads, or feeling unable to pay the price of such benefits, these formers regard with distrust and disfavor measures for highway improvement; and they are likely to oppose efforts for the bet terment of our roads unless they can first be convince! that good roads will prove a paying financial investment. ►Speaking, therefore, in behalf of those who for any reason are not influenced by the higher considerations in favor of improved highways, I raise the question. Will it pay the farmers in dollars and cents to improve their public roads? Before attempting to answer this question, let us consider in what ways permanently good roads will prove financially beneficial to farmers. All will agree, I think that a good road will— 1. Economize time aud force in transportation between farm and market. 2. Enable the farmer to take ad vantage of market fluctuations in buying and selling. 3. Permit transportation of farm products aud purchasing commodities during times of comparative leisure. 4. Reduce the wear aud tear on horses, harness and vehicles. 5. Enhance the market value of real estate. But while it is easy to enumerate the ways in which improved roads will be financially advantageous to farmers, it is very difficult to esti mate, in dollars and cents,the benefits to accrue therefrom. Distrusting my own judgment in the premises aud fearing, also, that my opinions would have little weight with others, I sought the advice of the farmers themselves. Letters of inquiry were sent to sixty of the most intelligent farmers in forty counties located in the central anil northern parts of the state. The sub stance of these letters is given here with: 1. About what proportion of the public highways in your county are now good gravel roads? 2. Please estimate the average in crease (iu dollars and cents) in the selling price per acre of land through out th; ?~7Yzty, as the result of such gravel reads. 3. If all the public roads in your county were converted into improved highways, how much, in your judg ment, would it increase the average selling price per acre of land through out your county? 4. What would be a fair estimate of the cost per mile of converting our common dirt roads as they now exist into good gravel roads, provided, of course, the work were to bo performed economically under some competent, general supervision, and not ham pered by legal restrictions? 5. Supposing that your county were divided into 100-acre fattis and that the average distance of eacn farm from market were five miles, what, in your judgment, would be the average annual cost (in dollars and ceuts) to each farmer of our unimproved high ways? 111 answering the fifth question please take into account the reduced loads, increased time, extra wear and tear, and loss in sales from inability to deliver products when the market is best. Over forty replies to these queries were received. As would be expected, from the difference in soil, surface and distance from gravel beds, there is a wide range in the estimates of the different correspondents. Many of the estimates are necessarily mere guesses, while others are based on a thorough knowledge of the matters under consideration. The averages of these estimates should give—and they probably do give approximately—the consensus of opinion, held by the most intelligent farmers of the state, as to the cost and money value of improved highways and the loss due to poor roads. The approximate averages for the forty counties are as follows: First—The average estimated in crease in the selling price of land dtie to existing improved highways is (9.48 p3r acre. The estimates from which the average is made refer it most cases to lauds Dear tue improver roads; but iu a few instances they ap ply to all the lands of the couutv. The average increase, therefore, of $6.48 per nero is lower than was in tended for the lands near the improved roads. Second —The estimated average in crease per acre that would result from improving all the public roads is $9. Third—The estimated average cost of converting the common public roads into improved highways is $1146 pet mile. Fourth—The estimated average an- 1 nual loss, per lUU acres, from poor roads is $76.28. If these estimates are even approxi mately correct, they furnish a key to the satisfactory solution of the ques tion of highway improvement from the money standpoint. On the basis ol the last mentioned estimate the aver age annual loss per acre from pool roads is over 76 cents. In live year 9 the losses would aggregate $2492 for every section of land, and this sum would construct two miles at a cost oi $1226 per mile, which is $"0 per mile above the estimated cost given by the farmers themselves. The present road tax which, under existing laws, is largely thrown away, would, under a proper system of road maintenance, doubtless keep improved highways in perfect repair. If the foregoing statements are a near approach to the truth, it follows that the losses and expenditures which farmers actually incur on account ol poor roads would also secure perma nently good roads. Can any sane mind doubt the wisdom of exchanging the losses, delays, accidents nud vexation of spirt, occasioned by bad roads, for the comfort and other advantages of good roads when the cost is the same? But there is another side to this question, viz, the increased value ol land from highway improvement. As already stated, this increase is esti mated by the farmers consulted nt $9 per acre. This would enhance the value of each section of land $5760, which iB more than double the esti mated cost ($2292) of the two miles ol improved highway, which constitutes the quota for the section. Just here the objection may be raised that the improved roads would not increase the productive capacity of the laud, while the enhanced commercial value would increase the taxes. Let us, for the sake of argument, grant this plausible but fallacious objection, and then litid w hnt it amounts to. Let us suppose the increase in appraisement for taxa -tiou to be $4 per acre, and the tax rate 1 1-4 per cent. This would mean an annual increase in taxes of five cents per acre, or $5 per hundred acres. Would not our objector, after enjoy ing the benefits of good roads, be very willing to give therefore the extra $5, if necessary? Would he keep the money and go back to the thraldom ol mud roads? If so, he has the option of selling his farm at an advance, ac cording to the average estimates of his brother farmers, that will more than doubly reimburse him for his ex penditure on highway improve ment; and he can then remove to some native wild whose quiet waters have not been "troubled" by the spirit of progress. I am aware that many intelligent farmers will not accept the estimates of their fellow farmers as to themouey value of good roads—many who will even deny that improved highways have any appreciable money value. I am glad to know, however, that many I of these very same farmers favor good { roads,and wonld aid in their construc tion for the same reason that they I would build for themselves com fortable and even luxurious homes. | In view oi the very general reeog- I nitipn among farmers of the necessity and benefits of good roads. lam en j couraged to believe that a very large j proportion of the farming classes will heartily join with the- people of the cities and towns iu an effort to devise, j adopt and put into execution some ef | ficient, economical and equitable sys tem of highway improvement. Row to Make Animal Freaks. In 1858 the great Camille Daresta was named director of the Laboratory of Teratology to the Practical School of Higher Studies. Terutogenesis was I now on a firm foundation; monsters I were produced iu multitudes. | Dareste was able to obtain over thirty thousand specimens—wonder ful creations too—Cyclopearis whose single eye might have frightened the companions of Ulysses, ancient swine with both lower limbs united, animals with two Heads and eight legs, twins ' with trunks united, etc.—everything from the domain of fable to argument his scientific conquests. One may obtain monsters iu various ways—by warming the egg unequally, by varnishing or glazing certain po<- | tions of the shell, by shaking it dur ing the period that separates the lay iug of the egg and putting it in to in | cubate. Only recently Fevo made j monsters by submitting the eggs to the action of electric currents or in jecting toxines under the shells. The I most different types may be obtained J by using various processes. | This curious study has of late years - been undertaken in foreign countries, among others by Gerlach and AVrigle. ; Finally recently some Frenchmen have | undertaken it anew. Now, by modifying their surround ings Dareste produced monsters. If this is true,can we not,when we know ail the factors of the problems, obtain | new races?— Dr. T. C. Minor in Ciu ' aiuaati Lancet-Clinic. llow It Happened. I The Emperor of China—Anil all this trouble results from the attack I on the German missionaries? i Li, Hung Chang—Apparently. As soon as Kaiser Wilhelm heanl of the attack on the missionaries he got re j ligion.—Euck. [OUR NA\T AND SPAIN'S.I NAVAL STRENGTH Or THE TWO COUNTRIES COMPARED. XI ey Seem Evenly Mtc!ic