North Branch democrat. (Tunkhannock, Pa.) 1854-1867, April 18, 1866, Image 1
JJ3-RVEY SICKLER, Proprietor., * NEW SERIES, AwtcklyDemocratic _____ . paper, devoted to Poll •. tici, News, the Arts .-Fg^T3^l \-(& aid Sciences Ac. Pub- "1 §( ished every Wednes pay, at Tunkhannock IrSfiiVffi Wyoming County,Pa %A.'/ ySß|Jjil IY HARVEY SICKLERa ™ Term* —1 copy 1 year, (in advance) (2 00 let paid within six months, aS'2.SO will be charged V* paper will be DISCONTINUED, until all ar rearages are paid; unless at the option of publisher. ADVBiiTisirarG. 19 lines or , j | I . f Its*, make three] four I two j three six < one one square weeks xcceks.nio'th t nio th n,o'ili < year 1 (square I,oti< 1,20 i 2,25j 2.871 ?'99j I do. 2,00 2.50; 3,25 350 4 of; 5 6,00 I do 3 00/ 3 75) 4,75 5,50' ''oo 9,00 * Column. 4,00 450 6,50 8,00; J O,OO 15,00 J do. 6,00 6 50! 10,00) 12.00' I'.oo -25,00 4 do 8 00, 7,0 14,00; 18,00 * 3 >oo 35.00 1 do! 10",00' 12,00| 17,00- 22410j 28,00' 40,'. 0 EXECRIORS, ADMIN [SIR ATUTTS and AL'DI fOR'S NOTICES, of the usual length, $2,50 •BITUARIES, -exceeding ten 1 in-g, each ; REM AIOUS and LITERAR V NOTICES, not ofgeuera laterest, one half toe regular rules. Business Lards of one square, with paper, S5. JOB WORK of all kinds neatly executed, and at prices to suit he times. AH TRANSIENT ADVERTISEMENTS and JOB WORK n ust be paid for, when ordered - —"• ■ " 'xsmmmmmaaaassaMm fusiiuss jjtotw*. R,R. LITTLE, ATTORNEY AT DAW loga street, Tunkhannock Pa. Ha. COOPER, PHYSICIAN A SURGEON • Newton Centre. Luzerne County Pa. GEO B.TUTTOR, ATTORNEY AT LAW ' Tsnkhonnock, Pa. Office- n Stark's Brick ••k, Ttoga sttoel. • WN, M. PIATT, ATTORNEY AT LAW, O fice in Stark's Brick Block Tioga St., Tunfc annock, Pa. &{ie fuller flousf, HARRIS HI It q, PKXNA. The undersigned having lately purchased the •' BCEHLER HOUSE " property, has already com menced sueh alterations and improvements as will render this old and popular House equal, if not supe rior, to any Hotel in the City of Ilarrisburg. A continuance of the public patronage is refpect fallv so'.ieited. 7 GEO. J. BOLTON WALL'S HOTEL, LATE AMERICAN HOUSE, TUN KHAN NOLK, WYOMING LO., PA. THIS establishment has recently been refitted ai furnished in the latest style Everv attention will be given to the comfort and convenience ot those sit patronize the House. T. B. WALL, Owner and Proprietor . faakhannock, September 11, 1861. NORTH BRANCH HOTEL, JIESHOPPEN, WYOMING COI.NTY, PA Wm. H. COPYRIGHT, Prop'r HAVING resumed the of the above Hetel, the undersigned will spare no effort to reader the house an agreeable place ot sojourn for all who may favor it with their custom. 7 Win H COKTRIGHT. June, 3rd, 1863 " J> R. .T. C- BK<- K KR . PHYSICIAN *t SURGEON, Wenld respectfully announce to the citizenso'M y pii| t tfcat ko has located at Tynkbannock where he will promptly attend to all calls in the line of hie profewiou. f yy will he feund at home on Saturdays ot •weh week gfoailS flotft, TOWANCA, PA. p. B. BART LET, (Aeteeft. OJHAIRARD HOUSE, ELMIBA, K- Y. PROPRIETOR. The MEANS HOTEL, i one of tne LARGEST H i BEST ARRANGED Houses in the country—lt f Med up in the most modern and improved style, Md no pains are spared to make it a pleasant and wareeable stopping-place for all, ▼ 3, n2l, ly CLARKE, KE£?IEY7&CO7 MAXL'FACTL'KEUS AND DEALERS IX LADIES', MISSES' & GENTS' silft aiMassimm flats AXP JOBBERS IN ■ITS. CAPS, FURS, STRAW GOODS. PARASOLS AND UMBRELLAS. BUFFALO AND FANCY ROBES, 849 BROADWAY, CORNER OF LEONARD STREET, a.-sw mmm* B. V. CLARK, J A. egtiizr, > S. LXXENST- ) M. GILMAN, DENTIST, EI" OILMAN, has permanently located i n Tunk I* l hanncck Borough, and respectfully ter.derh i profeeeional eerviceg to the citizens of this placeand wrreunding country. 10N L WORK warranted < to give SATIT- ever VBttea's Law Office near the. Post VETO OP THE CIVIL RIGHTS BILL. WASHINGTON, March 27. CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. To the Senate of the United States:— I regret that the bill which has passed both Houses of Congress, entitled ''An act to protect all persons in the United States in their civil rights, and furnish the means of their vindication," contains provisions which I cannot approve consistently with my sense of duty to the w hole people, and my obligat ons to the Constitution of the United States. PROVISIONS. I ain. therefore, constrained to return it to the Senate, 'lie House in which it origi nated, with m\ objections to its becoming a law. By tl.c Hist section .ot the billali persons born in the United States, and not subject to anv foreign powv-r,excluding Indians not 1 axed, arc declared to be citi zen?, of the United Mates. Ttjis provision comprehends the Chinese of the Pacific States, Indians subject to taxation, the people called Gipsies, as well as the entire race designated as blacks people of color, negroes, inulattoes and persons of African blood. FEDERAL CITIZEN-HIP. Every individual of these races, bom in the United States i< by the bill made a cit izen of the United States. It does not ! purpose to declare or confer any other right of citizenship than "Federal citizen ship." It does purport to givr these classes of persons any status as citizens of States, except that which mav result from their status as citizens of the United States The power to confer the right of State cit izenship is just as exclusively with the sev eral States as the power to confer the right 'of Federal citizenship, is with Congress. 1 The right of Federal citizenship thus to be j conferred on the several excepted races R fore mentioned, is now for the first lime proposed to he given by law ' If. as is claimed bv many, all persons who are na tive born are by virtue of the Constitution eitizens of the United States, the passage otthe pending bill cannot be necessary to make thein such. If, on the other hand, such persons are not ciiizens, as may be assumed from the proposed legislation to make them such, the grave question presents itself when eleven of the thirty—six States are unrep resented in Congress at this time, it is sound policy to make our entire celored population, and all other excepted classes citizens of the United States. Four* mill ions of them have just emeiged from s!a very into freedom. Can it he reasonably supposed that they possess the requisite qualifications to entitle them to nil the priv ileges and immunities of ciiizens of the | United Sta'es? Have the people of the { se eral Males expressed such a convic tion? It may also be asked whether it i j necessary that they should be declared ; citizens in older that thev mav he secured ! in the enjoyment of 1 lie civil lights * pro j pus <1 to i e conferred bv the bill ? Those l ights are, by Federal a- well as State laws, secured to all domiciled aliens and foreigners, even before the completion of the process of naturalization, and it may safely be assumed that the same enact ments are siffi ie;:t to give like protec tion and benefits to those for whom this bill provides special legislation. Besides, the policy of the Government, from its origin to the present tiun, seems to have been that persons are stran gers to and unfamiliar with our institutions and our laws, should pass through a cer tain probation, at the end which, before attaining the coveted privilege, they must give evidence of their fitness to receive and to exercise the rights of citizens, a9 contemplated by the Constitution of the United States. THE NEGRO RACE. The bill, in effect, proposes a discrimi nate against a large number of intelligent, worthy and patriotic foreigners, and in fa vor of the negro, to whom, after long years of bondage, the av< nues of freedom and intellijjrnce have just now been suddenly opened. He must, of necessity, from his previous unfortunate condition of servi tude, be less informed as to the nature and character of our institutions, than he who, coming from abroad, has, to some extent, at least familiarized himself with the principles of a Government to wl-.ich | he voluntarily intrusts life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Yet it is now pro posed, bv a single legislative enactment*, to confer the rights of ci'izens upon all persons of African descent, born within the extended limits of the United States, while persons of foreign birth, who make our land their home,must undergo a proba tion of five years, and can only then becoxe citizens upon proof that they are of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same, The first section of the hill also con tains an enumeration of the rights to be enj 'ved bv these classes s<s made citizens in every State and Territory of the United States. The rights are to make, and en force contracts, to sue. be parties and give evidence; to inherit, purehasc. lpase, sell hold and convey real and personal proper ty, and to have full and equal benefit of all laws and proceeding for the security of person and property as is now enjoyed by white citizens. So, too. they are made subject to the same punishment, pains and penalties in common with white citizens and none otheia. Thus a perfect equality of tha white and oolored race* if attempt- "TO SPEAK HIS THOUGHTS IS EVERY FREEMAN'S RIGHT. "—Thomas Jeflerson. TUNKRANNOCK, PA., WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 1866. led to be fixed by Federal law in every State of the Union over the vast field of State jurisdiction covered by these enu merated rights. In no or.e of these can any ever exercise any power of dis crimination between the different races.— iHShe exercise of State policy over mat ters exclusively affecting the people of each State, it lias frequently been thought expedient to discriminate between the two races STATE ENACTMENT. By the statute of some of the States, North ern as well as Southern, it is enacted, for instance, that no white person shall inter marry with a negro or mulatto. Chancel lor Kent says, speaking of the blacks, "that marriage between them and the whites are forbidden in some of the States where slavery does not cxi-t, and they are prohibited in all the slave-bolding States ; and when not absolutely contrary to law. "they are revolting, and regarded as nti of fense against public decorum ' Ido not say that this bill repeals State laws 011 the subject of marriage between the two races, lor as the whites are forbidden to inter marry with the blacks, the blacks can only make such contracts as the whites them selves are allowed to make, and therefore cannot, under this bill, enter into the mar riage contract with the whites. I cite this discrimination, however, as an instance of the State policy as to discrimi- i nation, and to inquire whether, if Congress i can abrogate all State laws of discrimina- ! tion between tlie two races in the matter of real estat -, of suits, and of contracts gener ally, Congress may not also repeal the State 1 iws as to the contract of marriage 1 between the race.-? Hitherto every MIO- ) ject embraced in the enunciation of rights j contained in this bill has been considered as exclusively belonging to the States; — i they all relate to the internal policy and economy*of the re.-peetive States. They \ are matters which, in eaeh Smte, concern ; the domestic condition of its people, vary-J ing in each according to its own peculiar ; circumstances at d the safety and well be- i ing of its own citizens. FEDERAL RESTRAINTS. I do not mean to say that upon all these subjects there are not Federal restraints. As for instairce, in the State power of leg* islation over contracts, there is a Federal limitation that no State shall pass a law impairing the obligations of contracts; — and as to crimes that no State shall pass an ex post facto law; to money, that no State; sWnl make anything but gold and silver a j legal tender - But where can we find a ! led ral prohibition against the power of | any State to oiscrimi ate as to most of them jetween aliens and citizens, between arti- ; fictal persons, called corporations, and 1 natural persons in the right to hold real , estate. If it he granted that Congress can re peal all State laws discriminating between whites and blacks in the subjects covered! by this bill, why, it may be asked, may 1 not Congress repeal, in the same way, ail those laws discriminating between the two races on the subject of suffrage and office. If Congress can declare, by law, who shall hold lands, who shall testify, who shall have capacity to make a contract in a State, then Congress can by law also de clare who, without regard to race or color shall have the right to sit as a juror or as a judge, to hold any office, and finally to vote, in every State and Territory of the United States. As respects the Territo ties, they come within the power of Con gress, for as to thorn the law-making pow er is the Federal power; but as to the States, no similar provision exists, vesting in C'ongres the power to make rules and regulations for them. DISCRIMINATIVE PROTECTION. Theobjeet of the second section of the bill is to afford discriminative protection to colored persons in t' e full enjoyment of all the rights secured to them by the pre ceding section. It declares that "any per son who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, shall j subject, or cau-e to be subjected, any in- | habitant of any State or Territory to the) deprivation of any right secured or pro- , tected by this act, or to different punish- j ment, pains, or penalties, on account of! such person having at any time been held in a condition of slavery, or involuntary, servitu e, except as a punishment of crime j whereof the party shall have been dulv i convicted or by reason of his color or race, j than is prescribed for the punishment of white pet sons, shall be deemed guilty of a mis demeanor, and on conviction shall be. i punished by fine not exceeding one thou- i sand dollars, or imprisonment not exceed ing one year, or both in tbo discretion of the court.'' This section seems to he designed to ap-! plv to some existing or future law of a State or Territory, which mav conflict with the provisions of the bill now under consideration. It provides for counteract ing such forgitlden legislation by imposing a tine and imprisonment upon the h gisla tion who may pass such conflicting laws, or upon the officers or agents who shall put or attempt to put them into execution. It means an official offense, not a common crime committed against law upon the person or property of the black man. — Such an act may deprive tha black man of his property, but not of the r'ght to hold property. It means a deprivation of this right itself, either bv the State judiciary or the State Legislature. It it, therefore, assumed that, under this section, members of State Legislatures who should vote for laws conflicting with the provisions of this bill, that judges of the State courts who should render judgments in antagonism with its terms, and that marshals and sheriffs who should, as ministerial officers, execute processes sanctioned by State laws and issued by State judges in execution or their judgments, couid be brought befor<* other tribunals, and there subjected to fine and imprisonment for the performance of the duties which such State laws might impose. The legislation thus proposed invade s the judicial power of the State. It says to everv Sfuttf court or judge, "if vou deride that this act is unconstitutional; if you re fuse. under the prohibition of a State law Ito allow a negro to testify; if y>u hold . that, over subject matter, the State law ;is paramount, and refuse the right to the j negro, your error of judgment, however I conscientious, shall subject you to fine and imprisonment." Ido not apprehend that the conflicting legislation which the bill seems to contemplate, is so likely to occur as to render it necessary at adopt a measure of such doubtful constitutionali ty- NEEDLESS PROVISION, i In the next p'ace this provision of the j bill seems to be unnecessary, as adequate ; judicial remedies could be adopted to s- 1 cure the desiied end w thout. invading the ) immunities of Legislators "always impor tant to be pre-i 1 ved in the interest of pub lic liberty, without assailing the indepen dence of the judiciary, always essential to the preservation of individual rights, and without impairing tie effi nncv of ministe rial officers, a ways tiecessan for the main tenance of public peaca and otder. The remedy proposed by this section seems to he in this re>pect not only anomalous, but uneonetituth na', for the C<ii-titution guar anties nothing with certainty it it does not insure to the several States the tight of making and executing laws in regard to all matters arising in their jumdiction, sub ject only to the Constitution and constitu tional laws of the United States, the latter to be held to the supreme law of the land. LEGAL JURISDICTION. The third section gives the District Court of the United States exclusive " cog nizance of all crimes and offences commit ted against the provisions of this act," and concurrent jurisdiction with the Circuit Courts of the United States of all civi' and criminal cases affecting persons who are denied and cannot enforce in the Courts or judicial tribunals of the State or locality wherever thqw may be, any rights secured to them by ffie first section ; and the con struction which I have given to the sec nd section is strengthened by this third sec tion, for it makes clear what kind of deni al or deprivation of the rights secured bv the £ir-t section was in contemplation. It is a denial or deprivation of such rights '' in the courts or juil cial tribunal of the State.' It stands, therefore, e'ear <*f doubt that the offenses and penalties provided in the second section are intended for the State judge, who, in the clear exercise of his functions as a judge, not acting minis terially hut judicially, shall decide contrary to this Federal law. In other words, when a State juJge, act ing upon a question involving a conflict between a State law and a Federal law, and bound according to his own pidgmet t and responsibility to give an impartial de cision between the two, comes to the con clusion that the State law is valid anih the Federal law invalid, he must not follow • the dictates of his own judgment, at the peril of fine and imprisonment. The Leg islative department of the Government of the United States thus takes from the Ju dicial department < f the States the sacted and exclusive duty of judicial decision, and converts the State judge into a more minis terial officer, bound to decide according to the will of Congress. PERSONAL RfGflTB IN THE STATES. It is clear that in the States which deny to persons whose rights are secured bv the first section of the bll any one of these rights, all criminal ami civil cases affecting 1 them, will, by the provisions of the third section come tinder the exclusive cogni zance of the Federal tribunals. It follows that If in any State which denies to a col ored person any one of all those rights,that persons should commit a crime against the laws of the Stat', murder, arson, rape, or any other crime, all protection or punish ment through tit" court the State are taken way, and lie can onlv He tried and punished in the Federal courts. How is the criminal to be tried if the offense is provided for and punished by Federal law, that law and not the State law is to gov ern. FEDER \L TRIBUNALS. It is onlv when th<* offence do-'s not hap- - pen to he within the purview of Federal law that, the Fe feral Courts are to try and punish him under anv other law then resort is to be had to the common law as modi fied and chang"d by Stale legislation, so far as the same is not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws ot tlit United States. So that over this vase domain of criminal jurisprudence, provided by each State for the protection of its own citizens, and fer tile punishment of all persons who violate its criminal laws, Federal law, wherever it can be made to apply, displaces State law. The question here naturally arises, from what source Congress derives the power to transfer to Federal tribunals certain clas ses of cases embraced in this section ? The Constitution expressly declares that the ju dicial power of the United States shall ex tend to all cases in law and equality arising under this Constitution, the laws of the . Unitd States, and traatia* mada or which shall be made under their authority ; to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls ; to all cases of ad | miiality and maritime jurisdiction ; to con j trovcrsies to which the United Slates shall be a party; to controversies between two or more States ; between a State and citi zens of another Slate ; between citizens of the same State claiming land under grants of different States ; and between a State, citizens thereof, and foreign States,citizens j or subjects. Here the judicial power of the United | States is expresdy set forth and defined, ! and the act of September 14th, 1789, es tablishing (he judicial courts of the United : States, in conferring upon the Federal 1 courts juiisdiction over cases origiWttiug in ! State tribunals, is careful to confine them Ito the classes enumerated in the abovc-re : cited clause of the Constitution. This sec tion of the bill undoubtedly comprehends cases and authorizes the exercise of powers that are not, by the Constitution, within the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States T" transfer them to these courts would be an exercise of authority well cal culated to excite distrust and alarm on the part of ail t'te States, for the bill applies ! alike to all of them, ns w.-ll to those that j have as to those that have not been engaged . in rebellion. It may be assumed that this an thurify is incident to the power granted to .Congress by the Constitution, as recently amended, to enforce, by appropriate legis lation, the article declaring that neither sla very nor involuntary servitude, except as a punisliiin-Nt for crime, whereof the party -hail have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place sub ject to their jurisdiction. It cannot, however, be justly claimed thai with a view to the enforcement of this Constitution, there is at present any neces sity for the exercise of* ail the powers which this bill confers. Slavery has b-en abolish ed, and at present no win re "exists within the jurisdiction of the United States, nor has there been, nor is it likely there will be any attempt to renew it by the people or the States. If, however, ary such at tempt shall be made, it will become the du ty of the General Government to exercise any and all incidental powers necessary and proper to maintain inviolate the great law of freedom. OFFICERS. The fourth section of the bill that officers and agents of the Freedmen's Bureau shall be empowered to make ar ' rests : and also that other officers may be especially commissioned for that purpose by the I'resident ot the United States. It also authorizes, circuit courts of the United States and the superior courts of the Ter ritories, to appoint, without limitation, eom mis>ioners who are to be charg- d with the performance of quasi judicial duties. The fifth section empowers the commis sioners so to be selected by the Courts, to appoint in wiiting under their hands, one or more suitable persons, fiom time to time to execute warrants, and other prosecutions desired bv the bill. These numerous offi cial agents are made to constitute a set of police in addition to the military, and are authorised to summons a posse commitafns, and even to call to their aid such portions of the laud and naval forces of the United States ; or of the militia, as may be neces sary to the performance of the duty with which they are charged. This extraordi nary power to the Government, and to the officers whose number the discretion of the commissioners is the only limit and in whose hands such authority might be made a terrible engine of wrong, oppression and fraud. OUR LAND AND NAVAL FORCES. The general statutes regulating the land and naval forces of the United States, the militia, and the execution of the laws, are believed to be adequate to everv emergency which cm occur in time of peace. If it should prove otherwise Congress can at any time amend these laws in such a man ner as, while subserving the public welfare, net to jeopardize the rights, interests and liberties of the people. FEES. The seventh section provides that a fee of ten dollars shall be paid to each eommis- I sioncr in everv case brought before him, and a tec of five dollars to his deputy or deputies for each p-rson he or they may arrest and take before any such commis sioner in general for performing such oth or duties as may be required in the premi ses. Al! these fees are to he paid out of j the Treasury of the United St: tes, wheth- ; er there is a conviction or not; but in case of a conviction they are to be recover able from the def< ndant. It seems to me that under the influence of such temptation .had men might convert any law, however benefii iakintojin instrument of persecution and fraud. MIGRATION OF OFFICERS. I>v the eight section of the bill, the Uni ted State* Courts, which sit only in one place for white citizens, must migrate, the marshal and district attorney, and neces sarily the clerk, although he is not men tioned, to any part of the district, upon the order of the President, and there hold a court, for the purpose of the more speedy arrest and trial of persons charged with a violation of this act ; and there tlfft judge and other officers of the Court must remain on the order of the President, for the time designated. The rinth section authorizes the President, or such person as may be empowered for such purpose, to employ such part of tl e land and naval forces of the United States, or the militia, as shall *ba necaasary to prevaat tha violation and TEnMS, 82,00 PER. AimcM ® nforce the due execution of thisaet. This language seems to imply an important mil itary force, that is to be always at band, and whose only businesis to be the enforce ment of this act over the vast region where it is intended to operate. , ! i EVIL EFFECTS 1 do not propose to consider the policy of this bill. To me the details of the bill are fraught with evil. The white race and the black race ot the South have hitherto lived together und.-r the relation of master and slave—capital owning labor. Now, suddenly, that relation is changed ; and as to ownership,capital and labor are divorced, They stand now each master of itself, in this new relation one being necessary to the other. NEW ADJUSTMENTS. There will be a new adjustment, which both arc deeply interested in making har monious. Each has equal power in set tling the forms, ami if left to the laws that regulate capital and labor, il is confidently • believed that they will satisfactorily work out the problem, Cajfital, it is true, has more intelligence, but labor is never so ig norant as not to know its own value, and not to see that capital must pay that value. This bill frustrates this adjustment; it intervenes between capital and labor, and attempts to settle ques ions of political economy through the agency of numerous officials, whose interest it will be to fer ment discord between the two races, so far as the breach widens their employment will continue, and when it is closed, their occupation will terminate in a 1 our history In all our experience,, as a people living under Federal and State law. No such system as thai contemplated by the details of this bill has ever before been proposed or adopted to establish for the security of the colored race safeguards which go infi nitely beyoud any that the General Gov ernment has ever provided for the white race. In fact, the distinction of race color is by the bill made to operate in fa vor of the colored and against the white race. MUNICIPAL LEGISLATION. They interfere with the municipal legis lation of the States, with the relations ex isting.exclusively between a State and its citizens, or between inhabitants of the same State, an absorption and assumption of power by the General -Government t which, if acquiesced in, must sap or destroy I our federative system of limbed powers, and break down the barriers which pre serve the rights of the States. It is anoth er step or rather stride towards centraliza tion, and the concentration of all legislative powers in the National Government. The tendency of the bill must be to resuscitate the spii it of rebellion and to arrest the progress of those influences which are more closely drawing around the states the bonds of union and peace. SLAVERY ABOLISIIED. My lamented predecssor, in his procla mation of the Ist of January, 1868, order ed and declared that all persons held a* slaves within certain States and parts of States,therein designated, were and thence forward should ba free ; and further, that the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, would recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons.— This guaranty has been rendered especial ly obligatory and sacred by the amemd ment of the Constitution abolishing slavery throughout the United States. I therefore, fully recognize the obligation to protect and defend that cla<s of our people when ever and wherever it shall become neces sary, and to the full extent compatible with the Constitution of the United' States. RIGHTS OF FREKDMEX. Entertaining these sentiments, it only remains for me to say that I will cheerfully co-operate with congress in any measure that may be neeet-sary for the promotion of the civil right® of the freedmen, as-well as those of all other classes of persons throughout the United States bv judicial process, under equal and impartial iaws, in conformity with the provisions of the Fed eral Constitution. I now return the bill to the Senate, and regret that in consider ing the b.lls and joint resolutions, foity two in number, which have been thus far sub mitted for my approval, 1 am compelled to withold my assent from a second measure that has received the sanction of both Houses of Congress. ANDREW JOHNSON. WASHINGTON, D. C., March 27, 1866. followirg is a genuine transcript of an epitaph : "Here lies the remains of Thomas Wood hen. The most aimable of husband, the most excellent of men." "N. B. —The name is Woodcock but it would not come in rhyme." "Look here ma." said a young lady who had commenced taking lessons in painting jof an eminent artist, "see my painting; can you tell what it is?" Ma. after looking at ' it some time, answered, "Well, it is either a cw or a rosebud, I am sure I cannot telL i which." mm 1 "" " Mr. Cltmer. —The Hon. Heiste*- nrier lias rrsig"od Irs seat in the -iy- Pennsylvania, His resignation w ate of | the Benate Thursday Ufttflis#. •* sent to VGL. 5 NO 36. w 51?! $ W>'V>