oetr A Pretty Lyric . Well.partnomoie„Oh i nVver! Let gladness deck thy brow, Our heurtsare jo — ixted forever By'each-feligious vow. Misfortune's clouds:have vanished, 1 'Wit caused our bosoms pain;, 'Anil every care is banished, No,-more to come again. 4f.ope's.atar is brightly burning Within its brilliant dome, Aid. tells of joy, returning To cheer our rural home. It shines through gloom to - gladden, Dispelling grief and care, For sorrow ne'er eau sadden While it remaineth there timer); vales:we'll "wanttei; : And by; kelunghing.,streati, Our bosoms growing fonder: - 'l 4 reatltioVe's enchanting besm In yonder'uot'reposing 'lle plenty, side,by side, , „Each ,marn fresh joys, disclosing, fhtoUgh•life we'll gently glide. nOolOgio.4 . BeFinFY. of theAOrPit.West; TrufmzEithii.o-T1t1i139.A.16 O.IF DIRBOTORS., The Board of Directors , : of the Presbyterian, Theological Seminary of " the iNorth-West, met in the South PresbYterianChnrch, in the city of Chicago, on the Ist of September, at eight o'clock P. M., and was called to order by the President, Rev. S. T. Wilson. The following Directors were present: Synod of Oincinnati.—Rev. I.G. Monfort, D.A., Bev. R. L. Stanton, D.D., hey. W. B. Spence, Prof. 0. N. Stoddard, J. M. Glover. indiana.—Janies Blake, Victor King, Rev., J A. Steele. Northerssladiana.—Rev. J. C. Brown, Rev. L. }hemp, M. Ray, • F., N. Ewing Chicago.—Rev. S. T. Wilson, Ray. R. C. Mat thews, C. A. Spring. • Wisconsin. - Rev.; M Buchanan, Rev. 11 M. Robertson. /otea.--:-Rev. I. Phelps, D.D., Rev. S. D. Ma- After prayerpthe Board proceeded to business. The record of the proceedings of the last meet ing were read, after which the Board adjourned till to-morrow morning, at half-past eight o'clock. Closed with prayer. Wednesday Morning, : 8} o'clock. Board convened, and es its first business, spent a short time in devotional exercises: .. The toilorring,communieation from Rev. E. D. Maohlaster, D.D., Prdesior of Theology in this InstMitiop, - ail read : - To the ,ICev. the Board of Directors of the Pres. bytifiah q t hedlo:giceil Seminary of the North- West:l, • A heathen. magistrate , once, when sending an accused Party to the jndgment-seat of Ctesar to which-he had tippealed, made the very, sensible remark, that it seemedla him to be an unreason- able thing,to c eend a •,priaoner, and not . withal,to signify the crime laid against him. I• feel aSome what similar , embarrassment, in making to you 'this ednuntiniCatithi - , whieh, though not formally a defence, yet has in part. virtually, that charac ter ; when you have not arraigned rae. at your bar, nor found, against me' any, indictment; and when: no prosmintor has appeared , before. you to convict Me' of any 'offence. In these air:sum stanStie I;tuiyAnidef the necessity of myself in dforming,yon:if: the state of „the .case , on which'l address ' • It is kiMittn'te yon_that in - Anguat, 1856,1 and sixteen other gentlemen, most of them Directors of thellentimary them attNew'Albany, though not acting in any offidel - caPabity, sent in pamphlet form f e..eiroular addressed• to the ministers, ruling - elders and members of the churches under the care llteogynods of Cincinnati, Indiana; Northern :Ind's; Illinois; (Waage", Wisconsin, and lowa, pro. posing,the mnitne of-all these , Synods in -the three ' tion of the SeininarY;aild the adoptien of wlndever • meaeures:might beldeemed necessary and proper - for the establishment of an -institution ,worthy of the. North:West, ' competent to the service de manded; anffineet for the Master's use. In Sep tember 'an& October • following, 1.. and. two other brethren, in person hr.ought the' wiatter before these seventiyneds, and' preeented - to them the draught of a Constitution, which, after animated, harmonious' and' ' interesting discussions; was unanimously. adopted, by them all, with the en ception of a single , vote in. one of the .Synods. The Direethrs,appointed under thp Constitution in krovemfoli, 1856, elected me' one Of Abe, Pro feasters in the Seminary, and in Feb., 1857, I ac , °opted &e t :44014026a. This whole movement, and, in. partiCular the circular, by which, it was Initiated, and a few per sons, inditding ray,self,'Whe have beenliteignated as ".the prime movers,?rin.the affair, have been, through ja. period of ten months, ibegimoing from the 'rani When the' 'subject was yet pending in some' of the Synods, dowiLAill. the present, as sailed, from without these Synods, with accusa tions Mt whose Origin,' character, or motives I will Say net word, accusations, so far as they; have reference to me, ultimately rest on the giontnl Objection to my alleged-views of Slavery, and My alleged' design, silent with oilier •petsonly,-tci.. malw the, Seminary anwgencY for W factious aiyriiiilifsinatie 'agitation of that subject. , How far the representations which. have been induatrienelY spread'' abroad' throughout these Synods may have been their efo feat!, ittlinditeing apprebensionaandleare that I hold views of Slavery and its relitionsto the Sem . bury and the,Ohurek,, which, frommy.ctinnexion. with the Seminary, maybe ofeevii. tendency, it is impossible for 'Me to know l; without a fuller knowledge than I:possess of thn'extent _to which there may exist in those, on whom they are in tended to operate,' a morbid state of mind on this subject of Slaiery, predieposing them to give to each apprehensions and fears, a ready entertain ment. For the sake of the Seminary and the Church, I am willing to do whatever Han, not , only to satisfy reasonable inquiries, but to allay unreasonable apprehensions and fears, if such exist, andlo 'quiet the minds of those who are disturbed. I therefore•deem it proper for me, so faraffin - lar - relskalhe 13eminary . I am in volved 'in the matter, to make to you, and through you to all whom it concerns, a clear and explicit statement of my views on the subject: ,First. If, then, the question be asked of me, "What are the objects for which the Seminary has been established at Hyde Park ?" I, answer, the objects are declared:in the Constitution; in the circular 'of August, 1866, by which : the move= meat was Initiated . ; in all the discussions of the subject in the' Syrieds ; and in all which has been said and•done before.and since by the friends of the Seminary. And they are all comprehended in the training of young men for the ministry. _ Second. If the question• be asked, Was it not the design of thOlm who have been designated as " the prime movers" in the measure's which have i plresulted..in the, establishment of the Seminary at •,.• Ryde Park to nake it iti'diencyeligiallY , for the' on or discussion of Slavery ?" I anitwer . ,. • ' o l itr a ithink that the proper reply to this inquiry; htthe simple statement, that neither in the circa-- , ler of August, 1866,-which emanated:from theta: nor in' the Constitution* of . the-Seininary, which was drawn up and presented to, the Spoils by them, nor in the discussions of the Subject:in any. • o f . th e Spode by; them or by any one else, was the.sitbjectiot Slavery , so much as mentioned. • For myself I will say, that so far as mi.agen cy in the bUsiness concerned, precisely the same movement would hive been made; and pre cisely the- same .measures. in all respects would have been adopted; if no such 'thing as Slavery had ever existed in the country or in the world. The brethren who have been disturbed, have allowed themselves to be very unnecessarily put into a flutter on the.subjeot. Slavery may have been thought of along with many other things, but the story that the Seminary was designed to be an agency specially for the. agitation or dis cussion of slavery is so absurd, that those who told it must have counted largely on, the credulity of their hearers. Third. If the question be 'asked, " What are the relations which I think the Seminary ought to have to the subject of Slavery ?" I answer, I think it ought to have no relations to Slavery dif ferent from those which it heti to twenty, or forty; 4 , other acknowlefte,d'eyils of like-character and iffagnitnde "end t o 'Which the Mini:lll /and the lot s country of the North 7 West atand ' in a ,like rela tion as to Slavery. ' It certainly is -not , the bnsi ..;agiiip Theological 'SeMiruiry4''fii• orknoi2 e egenetes and institutemeasures for the removal of Slavery, or of any other particular form of evil, moral, or political, or ecclesiastical, or do mestic, existing in society ; but to teach young men how to expound and apply the Scriptures, and to fulfill ,the work of the Gospel ministry. Christianity, •Which it is the business _of the min istry to expound and preach, is a system of prac tical truth, intended for the remedy of all moral evils, and of all other evils which are the penal effects of moral evil ; and hence it has 'various relations, to; and bearings on all such evils ; and these I think that it is the business of the Pro fessors in a Theological School, in proper 'con nexions to indicate; whether in the . didactic exposition of theology,- theoretical and practical, .in'the exegesis of the Scriptures, or in recount iag history of Christianity and the Church. If any man be held to be Bo wanting , in discre tion that he cannot be trusted to do this accord ing, to the truth, certainly it is not fit that, he should be put into the place of an instructor in a Theological school. Fourth. If the question be asked, What are my views 'of slavery ; of the' qinition, 'whether Christianity sanctions Slavery ; and of the duty of Christians in relation to Slavery 7" I answer these,questions 1. To the question, " What are my. 'views. of slavery 7" I give this • answer : .1. - wish to-define what I understand to be meant by the term Sla very; in distinction from a system of mere volun tary servitude, which is either right or wrong; ac cording to the circumstances' of each case, Slavery then, I understand to bemeant that eye ' tem which, according to the doctrine of the most eminent among the Greek writers on Moral, and Political Philosophy, current throughout the civ ' ilized.worldan the deys , of Christ and- his-apos tles, held that the relation :between master and slave, is ,like that between the artizan and his • tools, and 'that stave„is "an aniMatedlool," or "-a tool without . a sou&in it." See, Arisiotle Eth.' Nieentach, L. LX ,C. 13. By slave,* I understand' to he meant that .syStein wbiCh obtained. in the Roman Empire, in the days 'of-Christ and, his apostles; according to which " &sires were held pro minis; pro mortals; pro guadrupedibus ;" that . is aa not persons; as dead in law ; or without civil righti; , as &Asti beasts.' By slavery I understand to be meant that system which obtains in our own times, - : and in some of the States of our own country under which, as it is expressed . in the. Laws of South Carolina, " Slaves shall be deemed, held, taken,'reputed, and adjudged in law; to be chattels personal in the hands - of their owners and possessors, and their executors, administra tors and assigns, to allintents , ,i mirposes and con stritetiOns And now, if the qUestion be asked, fd What are my views of slavery 7" I answer, I think the sys tem of siavery which has now been defined, to be intrinsically, essentially, and necessarily immoral. Or, iu the Words of the Presbyterian Church itself, ,in its action of 1818, " We consider the voluntary enslaving of one portion of ,the human family; by another, as a gross violation of the most precious and sacred rights of human nature - as utterly inconsistent with • the -law of God, which' requires us to love our neighbor as our selves; and, as totally irreconcilable with the spirit and principles of the Gospel of. Christ, which, enjoin that all things whatsoever ye would that others should do to you, • do ye even the same to them." , 2.•1f the question be asked,.-" De I think that Christianity sanctions Slavery ?" I answer again, in, thewo is `of the , Church, that I think that slavery '! s totally irreconcilable with the spirit and principles of the Gospel of Christ." 4. If the question be asked, 'What:do I think is, the duty of Christians in relation to Slavery?" I answer yet again in the words of the Church, `that "it is manifestly the dutyof ail Christians who enjoy the light of the present day, when the inconsistency, of Slavery, both with the dictates of humanity and religion, has been demonstrated and is generally seen and :acknowledged; to use their honest, eamest, and .unwearied endeavors to correct the errors of former times, and -as speedily as possible to efface' this blot en our.holy religion, and to obtain the complete abolition of Slavery throughout Christendom, and if possible, throughout the world." At the Same, I frilly agree with the exhortation of the Assembly, to 'these eitenipt .from this great evil " teforbear harsh censures and uncharitable reflection 'on their-brethren, who unhappily live among slaves whom they cannot imtnediately set free; but who are really using all their influence and all their 'endeavors to bring them into a state of freedom, as soon as' a door for it can be opened." . And, moreover, .I would use stronger tennis than any General Assembly has ever used, to .express my scram of the manifold, complice.ted, and embarr assing difficulties which encompass the practical question of emancipation and the proper disposal of, the slave population ; and of the wisdom, *and prudence, and patience, required in dealing with the whole subject. Nth.. If the question be asked, "Do I think that the holding of slaves is in all:cases an immor ality, the renunciation of which, ought to be made a condition of membership in the Church ?" I an swer that I think there are many cases where men stand in view of the law and its ministers in the legal relation of slavelaolders which for various - reasons they are unable rightfully to terminate ; andlliai in 'subh cotes, while they cannot without immorality'deem, hold, repute and adjudge their servants to be chattels in the handw of their own . ers, to, all intents, purposes and -constructions Whatsoever; it is, not only their right, but their tatty to hold them so long as the necessity exists, as their bond-servants, and if need be, their in voluntary bond-servants. Of course, in any such _case ite,is only „that which is an immorality the renunciation of which ought , to be made condition -of membership in the Church. Sixth. If the question 'be asked; "Do I ap prove of the positional the Presbyterian Church on the Subject- of Slavery ?" answer, that I approve of the position of the Church on the sub ject, of Slavery, as this is determined by a full and:tair'collation and interpretation of all her public authoritative acts in relation to it; upon the 'acknowledged princiPle of , interpretation, 'that what is obscure, ambiguous, ,doubtful, or Otherwise exceptionable, is to;be'; nterpreted by ;what is' clear, unambignouti, certain and unex eeptionable. ' Seventh. If the question be asked, "Do I think 11 my duty, either in my professional or. my non. •irefeeeional.'4 relatiOris, th • disonsst the subject of Slavery ?" I give' the folldwing answer . : L I do not.think.that I.have, any special voca tion to discuss the subject of Slavery' more than other eVils ; and that it is less my duty to discuss it than evils existing among ourselves, and to which we have a nearer and more immediate re 2. I think that all.mYhahits of mind and of life indispose me to exaggerate any one evil ; or to give to any ene_subject, believer :important, an undue prominence ; or to take in relation to it extreme views. As to this great evil of Slavery, "I May appeal to my past bourse irrirelation to it. have now been twenty-five years 444 ministry., .In all tha l t time; all that I have evert printed ors the-' subject of Slavery, amounts to` less than:', tweittfY.ffve yearsto less , thansev-, en pages ; and much-of that occupied in guarding against extreme views. L have never .belonged to any Abolition or-Anti-Slavery Society, but., have'always on.fat occasions publicly'and private ly expressed my dieapproval 'of much in the' ' 1 ,measures and spirit of those to whom the name 2ef "Abolitionists," , has been improperly appro priated. I have neverpreachecl a sermon on the subject. I have never treated of the subject; except occasionally as an incidental „reference in my instructions in the Seminary. I have never introduced the, subject into any of the Church " Jndicatories. I have never - Participated in any discussion of the subject in the Judicatories when introduced by others, except once in 1845' in the Synod, of Cincinnati, and then in support ofepaper intended to harmonize the conflicting 'views in that body, by distinguishing between ,the Slavery,whiehis to, be, condemned and mere involuntaryservitude, which is right orivrong ac. ,cerditig, to circumstances.' Such. has been my 'Pait'course in.reference to the aubject. Ido not mention 4t here in order to claim commendation forit; for I think it doubtful whether it is worthy of coirmihndatiori • but Simply' as what iphistori ,cally, the truth. , 3. I think that it is my duty to maintain for Myself, freedom of opinion and of speech an all questions of public morals, inclusive of that of the moral character of Slavery ; and that of the place, and time, and measure, • and manner in which I ihall dismiss such questions I must my-, self be the judge, under very Proper responsibil itieslo God, and to my fellow:men in the rela tions which I , sustain to them for any abuse of ' my right. These, gentlemen, are my views of Slavery, and of all: the various questions in, relation to it, on which I have supposed that an expression of my views might be desired; , They are the views of Slavery which .I have always held, ever since I have been in the ministry, and for years before, and which I have uniformly expressed whenever I have said anything on the subject aud.the yeti otis questions in relation to it.. Perhaps the mis ,-. representations of,mY views on the !Fabjeat have : producedx very little effect' . atipiliere ,• and this ooxamnsiestion.utarbe wholly &work ,. of supei erogation ; bat as the Synods unitedlisithe dine- ,1 THE PRF,SI3YTERIAN tion of the Seminary are, under the Constitution, the bodies which have the supreme control of its affairs, I desire that a copy of this letter be sent to each of them I am, reverend and dear brethren, your fellow servant in the Gospel, E. D. MAOMASTER. Chicago, Sept. Ist, 1857. After the reading of the above communication, Rev. J. D. Mason offered the following resolutions thereon, viz : Resolved, That this communication be received and recorded on our minutes. Resolved, That this presentation upon the part of Dr. Mao Master of, his views upon the subject of Slavery, is to us satisfactory; and considered entirely concurrent with the position of the Gen eral Assembly of our Church, on this subject of Slavery. Resolved, That as requested in the close of the communication, a copy of it be sent to each of the Synods concurring in the establishing and iontrolling of the Theological Seminary of the North-West. The above resolutions, together , with, the com munication of Dr. Maalaster, were referred, on the motion of Rev. Dr. Phelps, to a committee of one from each Synod, and their report was made the order of the day for this afternoon, at 3 clock. . .I.ly appointment of the President, the follow ing named individuals were chosen - said eons:mitt' tee _ . Rev. R. L. Stanton, D. D., of Synod of Cincin nati ; Janies Blake, of the Synod of Indiana; Rev. Levi Hughes, of the Synod of Northern.ln diana; J. M Buchanan,'of the Synod of Wie censin ; Rev. F. N. Ewing, of the Synod Of ' Illinois ; Rev. R. C. Matthews; of the Synod of Chicago; Rev. 3. D.• Mason, of the. Synod of lowa. ~Rev.. Dr. Stanton moved that the name of Rev: Dr., M'onfort'imi substituted for his own on that comtnittee, which 'motion was Mgt. `The Executive and4inancial. , COmmittee,of the Board presented, : through Mr. A. Spring,.a, re port ~of their doings, which was received, and, with accompanying documents, referred to a com mittee of three, who were Charged with the' duty of preparing the Annual Report of the Board;