, t _ DVOC LRIAL . N . ~ E yT , Presbyterian Banner, Vol. V. No. I. Presbyterian Advocate, Vol. XV1.11,110. 48. DAVID McKINNEY, Editor and ProprietO TERNS.-IN ADVANCE. Original iota rp'. Summer Song. 13Y IV. WHITTON RRDICit. [This was furnished in Season. It is not yet inappropriate.] "From brightening fields of ether fair disclosed, Child of the Sun, refulgent Summer comes." • Thompson's Seasons. How sweet is the clime • Of the Summer time, Where the Winter never•_ comes; Whore the beauties ne'er fade In which Nature's arrayed, Nor the frost nor the bleak - wind numbs. 0, fair is the scene, Where the groves all green, Wave ever beneath a bright sky; Where the gay bird calls Through her airy hails, And the zephyrs mild whisper by. Where the fig entwines .Lurid clustering vines, Where flourish the olive and palm ; Where the orange tree blooms, And the spice-perfumes. Are shed out o'er the : fields like balm. Where mansions peep out From espaliers about, In beautiful splendor and pride; And chariots grand Roll over the land, And float gondolas float on the tide. 0, pleasantly tbere, And with little of care, Life passes all joyous and , bright; Ever genial and warm, Through sunshine and storm, This clime is the clime of delight. Pittsburih, 1856. For the Presbyterian Banner and Adrocate. Baptism.--No. 1. We propose to offer a few plain thoughts on baptism, designed especially for the youthful readers of the .7340,n,ir ond Advo cate, This work is the wore necessary at the present time, as the advocates of immersion are making very great efforts to propagate their peculiar views of the subject: First, I shall consider TUE MODE OF BAPTISM. It is well known that there is quite a di versity of opinion and practice among Chris tians in this respect. The far greater part, amounting to full nine tenths, of Evangelical Christians, content themselves with a simple application of water by pouringor sprinkling, as the most Scriptural and significant mode. A large and respectable body, however, styling ,themselves Baptists, insist upon a dipping of ',the whole body under water, as essential to ;:valid baptism. Another body of. Christians, ',not inconsiderable in numbers, strenuously i maintaba that unless the dipping be three times repeated, it is no baptism at-all. OUR; POSITION DEFINED. I . P. As to the mode,,we regard it as in, itself ` l d very little importance. We cannot for ,a , moment suppose that the quantity Of water, lor the action of baptism, can in any wise :'-effeettb,o state .of. our hearts, or decide our condition before .God. Very • little evil i woulii i therefore result from the diversity •of practice existing, provided that none would lay any particular stress upon their peculiar mode. Just so, in the celebration of the Sacramental Supper ;,different . modes. ofj ad ministration may be practiced Without aeriuus detriment tri the interests of religion. We believe, indeed, that the , usages of our own Church, in this respect, are truly Scrip tural and edifying ; and that the participation 1 of a very •small p ation of the elements of read and wine, at any convenient hour of the day, if done in the exercise - of faith and love, is a sufficient compliance with the `aviour's dying command; Yet, if some ,tber Christian denomination should believe t their duty to assemble after night, and t k much larger quantity of the bread, and• , ink a greater quantity of wine, in reniem ,rance of Christ, than is customary with- us, t might be said of them that they were in .rror, indeed, but that their error was com .aratively harmless, so long as they attached Sao importance to it. But if, on the con rary, they should begin to lay great stress pt-n their peculiarity, making it the prin cipal and favorite theme of public and pri ate discussion ; if they should claim to be he only Christians on earth who render bedience to Christ's dying injunction ; if hey shoold ridicule-the idea that the eat ng of a small crumb of bread and a taste f wino at noon-day should be deemed a upper in any sense of the word, and should' - onsequently affirm that all who follow that oractiee are without one of the Sacraments, .nd living in a state of disobedience to ihrist, dangerous to their souls; if they .hould, moreover, pronounce all such un orthy of the fellowship and commun on of saints ; what would we say such. Christians? We would say that eir error, though unimportant; in itself, d become a mischievous and dangerous , against which every faithful watchman °nil r.ound the- alarm. In this we are sus , ined by the VIEWS OF THE APOSTLE PAUL, s expreS§N in a similar case. He regard .o eireumciaion, under the New Di.pensa- , Con, as of no consequence in itself, one way '.r another, " Neither circumcision availeth nything, •nor uncireumeieion, but faith, hien worketh by lea s ~f, Gal. v t 6. Yet, ' hen the Galatians were persanded by false -rite, to attach great importance to that -rite, as binding upon the Christian Church, and as necessary to their acceptation with .God, the Apostle denounced their .error as sin eseeediegly dengerous One. he declared '. bat if they were circumcised with such views as these. " Christ would profit them , °all ri LC ;" Gal. v: 2. , Tll E POSITION OF THE BAPTISTS. i. Let us now apply the foregoing illustra: tons to the ease in hand. Our Baptist brethren think it their duty to be baptized by a total immersion in water. If they could be content to practice in accordance with this opinion, attaching no great im portance to it, and allowing to all others the ;undisturbed enjoyment of their own views e of duty, little harm would be done. But .they are not willing to pursue a. course so • oharitable and peaceful. They lay pro ' digioua stress upon immersion. They seek o magnify its importance on all OCCSSIOPS. "ONE THING IS NEEDFUL:" "ONE TVING HAVE I 13 SIRED OF THE LORD:" "THIS ONE THING I DO." ~, . . Thelie it the most prominent topic in their .stratiens. They value themselves for ha submitted to immersion, and boast that th ,re the only baptized believers iu the lap Al the same time they declaim against rs as guilty of disbhedience to Uhristr . herefere in danger of coming short of .al life. They debar from the table of t ord all persons, however emi nent for P C whose baptism 'has not teen by immersioccounting them unworthy of their Corn lyn and `fellowship. Thus, they Place t nof excommunication upon nine-tenths , Christianmorld ! . 04 4.^-di that this position of our BaPtiit bret4 must be, attended with much mleeh i e ' Among the many thou sands wholistm...l, their instructions, may there not be mu des who receive the inl. pression that i ion is the great essen tial to salvationi„,s. surest passport to heaven ? Are - under a necessity to combat positions Ight with so much danger to souls i THE Q Since, then, ti upon us, let us in fairly understood. insist that the Lord mended us to be it ly that •those who living in open disobei and as such are not the table of the Lord falling short of heavi join, issue with these 1 Christ has really comml the duty is so important is attended with such serf then there ought to be the plieit proofs of it in the ' , produce such proofs, if burden rests upon them,, , put us off with . traditions of the opinions of men. Let the most positive evidence ft of God. I care not what the the Baptist Bible Union may says the old. Bible? IMMERSION NOT A PLAIN After all, our Baptist brethren hat immersion . is not very clew. Bated in the Scriptures_ This, indirectly admitted by the great boi . . most zealous iminrsionists in our They are now expending tens of thou: dollars in getting up, a-new version of 1 We, with such alterations from the old am make it teach Baptist opinions, clearly, a' plicitly. What does this mean ? It is tainly an important;admission on their. in It proves that in their own opinion the di of immersion is not plainly taught in present Scriptures. For if, it be alrem. 'plain there, •why wish to make alterations But, say our Baptist brethren; " The very word baptize signifies to immerse, so that the command to baptize is ,a command to-im meile." But let them prove this position. Let them show that baptiie means immerse, and nothing but immerse. Let them estab lish it not by their own empty assertion, or by mere human opinions, bat by the Bible itself. This it will be easy for them to do, if their assertion is correct For, happily, the sense of the word baptize, as used by the sacred writers, may be tested by any 'reader of the Bible, whether learned or un learned. SCRIPTURE TIAPTIRN, NOT.IMMERSION. For example, let us take. the words of John the ;Baptist, recorded in Mat. iii : 11, " I indeed baptize you with , water, but he (Christ) shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire." What did John here wean by the term baptize? Did he mean dip or plunge.? Did he intend to say, "he shall dip or plunge you into the Holy Ghost and into the fire ?" Common sense answers, no. Again, let me ask how and when was this remarkable. prophecy of the Forerunner fulfilled ? Our _Saviour referred to it just before the day of Pentecost, when he was about to ascend to heaven, saying to his Disciples "that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which; saith he, ye have heard of me. For Johntruly baptized with water, but .ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence ;" Acts i : 4, 5. Accordingly, only a few.days after, at the Pentecostal feasts this premise of the Father was literally fulfilled. But how ? Were the ApostfOs 'dipped or plunged into the Holy 'Ghost and into k the fire ? Read ,the whole account 'of th 3 6, transaction in" the second abnter. of the Acts of the Apos tles, ari7llll4 verses sixteen and seven teen, you' will find Peter affirming that therein was fulfilled the word of the Lord by the, Prophet Joel, saying, " I will pour out of my Spirit." Again, I ask, how were the 'disciples baptized with fire ? Were they immersed in fire ? No ; but cloven tongues , like as of fire, sat upon each of teem. ", True, some Baptist writers contend that the disciples were immersed on this occa sion. And in what ? Why, in wind ! I am sorry to say that too many of their argu ments are rather windy than solid; and this is not more so than some others. But let us look at the record, Acts ii : 2, "And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a mighty, rushing wind, and it filled all the ..mouse where they were sitting." Here a perceive that there was no wind in the case, but only a sound ; and the sound was like ; that of a mighty, rushing wind, and •the sound filled the house. Thus it appears • that the argunientof our brethren is nothing but sound. It ignot even as substantial as wind. We mayag9rat the Apostle Peter, on a subsegneWoceitsion .'makes striking reference to this bliptiicin of the Holy Ghost. He says, "As I began to speak; the Holy Ghost fell on them, as it did on ..us at the beginning. Then remembered I the word of the Lord; how be said, John indeed b.p tized with water, but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost; Acts xi : 15, 16. Here, then, is an instance of a baptism without an immersion ; for, according to the Apostle Peter, the Spirit was pouted Out, or fell upon the disciples. And it proves, ht. yontka doubt, that the word baptize, in the New Testament, does not signify immerse ; and, of course, the command to baptize is not a comm an d to immerse. The idea of immersion in the Holy Ghost is repugnant to all Scriptural notions of the subject. The sacred writers every where `speak of the Holy Spirit as poured out, shed do*nror feltin g upon the subjects of his gracious influences. Thus, Paul speaks of the, "washirk of regeneration, and the're neiliting of the Holy Ghost," as "Shed on FOR THE WEEK ENDING SAVVY( [we are not immersed in them,] abundantly, through Jesus Christ."—Tit. iii : 5.. Some assert that by the washing of regeneration, is meant, being "born of water ;" and by the renewing of the 'Holy Ghost, being "._born of the ,Spirit;" as Christ says, " born of water and of the Spirit." lt this be true, it proves conclustvely, that in the Apostolic age, the water of baptism was shed upon the subjects. L. N. D. For the Presbyterian pelaner and Advocate. Prater and Prejudice. "Does Mr. MaSon attend the prayer-meet ing ?" said a visitor from the city to her friend 7 with whom she was spending a few weeks in the country. " No; he does not; and I am, on the whole, well pleased to have him stay away," was the reply. " On what account? "Oh, he is such .a pompous man. Every thing he does seems to be an act of conde scension to those who axe present. He would think he put the whole church under obligations to him, if he were to 'attend the prayer-meeting."; " Yon are too severe." " Did you ever see him in company ?"