TRIAL OF JOH3 LEFEI BE. [COSTINTFH FROM FIRST PAGE.] FRIDAY. John Pugh recalled, and Court per mitted him to relate what Lefevre swore before the inquest, differing from Duffv's statement in that, instead <>f drawing the body immediately from the stairs through the kitchen door, he drew her out into the hall near the pantry door. Smith Greer and James Wike were called and eorrolwrated Pugh Marv Elliott, daughter of defendant. —I washed the back skirt and part of polonaise of deceased on Friday, the second day after the funeral ; the polo naise was of dark calico and had strips torn out of the front; I burned her chemise because I did not think it fit to wash. [Witness' modesty seemed to prevent her telling the condition of the chemise.] Question by the Court —Had she been unwell ? Answer —Yes, sir. Amelia Koedel, Mollie Pugh, W m. Moser and Belle Sarver(another daugh ter of defendant) testified to Mrs. Le fevre fainting, some six or seven years ago, while an evening party was in progress at her house ; this was before she married Lefevre. Mrs. Pugh, recalled—Last winter a year ago Mr. and Mrs. Lefevre helped us to butcher; Mrs. Lefevre said she was sick, felt very bad and would have to sit down; she did sit down; she told me this sickness came on her monthly, and that she was afraid it would be the end of her yet. Cross-examined — Question —On the day of John Lefevre's wedding, when he married the deceased, did you not sit down on John Lefevre's knee and comb his whiskers ? Answer —Xo, sir; I sat down on both their knees, as much on Mrs. Le fevre's as on Mr. Lefevre's, but I did not comb the hair of either of them. Question —Haven't you been the cause of all the trouble between Le fevre and wife ? Answer —Xo, sir; when he left his wife be came to our house, not with mine, but my husband's consent. Little Harry Cooper, recalled—From the time mother was buried up to the time of the arrest of stepfather, which was more than a week, my brothers Tommy, Willie and myself, slept and ate in the house and attended school; John Lefevre was at home eve-y night; we cooked our own meals and made our own beds. F. M. Eastman, stenographer, sworn Took notes at the hearing before the Magistrate at preliminary hearing; Harry Cooper said that his mother said her eyes were getting weak, and she felt like she was going to faint. Dr. Wm. Irvin, sworn—l reside at Evansbnrg, this county, on the Pitts burgh A Northwestern Railroad ; am an ex-member of the State Legisla ture; have been a practising physician for twenty-seven years in that locality; I attended Cleveland College, and also Jefferson College, Philadelphia; I be long to what we call regulars, but others call it the allopath school of physicians; external and internal symp toms of death from strangulation would be face and neck swollen and discol ored, eyes open, pupils dilated, mouth open, tongue swollen and protruding, hands flexed, lungs congested, some of the air cells ruptured, and the blood in lnngs highly colored because of having been carbonized and oxydized ; would expect to find right oricle and right ventricle of heart with blood in, but none in the left side; would expect to to find mucous membrane of stomach congested ; would expect to find blood in pulmonary arteries, mucous mem brane of windpipe congested, with bloody mucous in pipe itself; persons are liable to die from sudden shock oc casioned by grief, joy, Ac., because the contractions of the heart are arrested ; sudden death may be produced by con cussion of the brain ; then the flow of nervous fluid from the brain necessary to keep the heart in active condition would cease ; in case of sudden death from either, the face and neck would l»e pale and not swollen ; in case of death from asphyxia or strangulation, the face and neck would be livid and swollen. Cross-examined —l recognize Tay lor's Medical Jurisprudence as a stand ard authority, and I would not like to get into a controversy with it. Judge McCandlcss reads from Tay lor's Medical Jurisprudence: "In case of strangulation the brain is sometimes congested, hut commonly in a natural state." Is that good authority ? Witness —Does Taylor say that ? Col. Thompson objects to the coun gcl reading from a note which is not what Taylof says, but what he quotes as M. Yardou's experience, and which he condemns. Book shown to witness, at page 425. Witness says that is what Taylor quotes from Yardou and affirms as cor rect ; I respect Taylor and don't want to get into a controversy with him; on condition of brain when death is caused by strangulation, Taylor is good authority. Dr, N. M. Hoover, sworn—l reside in North Washington, this county ; have had fifteen years civil practice as physician, and two years and a half in the U. 8. Army. Witness corrobo rated Dr. Irvin in almost every par ticular. Judge Bredin recalled I>r. Irvin and asked him this question: In case of strangulation, while a person was in an unconscious state from concussion, what symptoms of strangulation would you expect to find, if any ? Defendant's counsel objects because there iB no evidence or proof that this woman was in an unconscious condi tion at the time referred to; that the fact assumed in the question of the Court, to-wit, the unconscious condi tion of the patient, is a theory and in ference, and, being only a theory or deduction, it cannot be the basis or grounds upon which to build another theory or inference, to-wit, what phys ical indications of strangulation as sumed or the hypothesis of the case put by the Court would present; also, it i* not cross-examination. Objection overruled and exception noted. Court here announced that they overrule the motion made yesterday to strike out testimony of Dr. King, and exception noted. In answer to question by tbe Court, Dr,.Lr riff said : If the concussion was soyere it might partially paralyze tbe heaQ, so that the muscles would not dfeito :t/h« blood with sufficient force into the capillary vessels so as to dis tend.them or rupture the air cells, and these might not be any congestion of tbe lunga or brain. Co\irt took a iwjjot tin » p. x AFTERXOON SESSION. Dr. Hoover was recalled and corrob orated I)r. Irvin as to symptoms of death by strangulation when person is j in an unconscious condition from a . shock. Dr. A. M. Xeyman. of Butler, was ; sw<>rn. and gave almost a repetition of . the testimony of Drs. Irvin and | Hoover. Dr. C. H. Lee. of Butler, sworn—l ' am of homcepathic school ; I think in- j ternal symptoms of death by strangu lation same as Drs. Irvin. Hoover and Xeyman. [[Defence attempt to show bv the Doctor's experience that ecchy niosis may appear on part of head or neck remote from place of injury. J My mother fell down stairs and the injury produced discoloration on neck and side of head; a little boy named Karns, living in Springdale. Allegheny county, while coasting down a hill struck the front part of his neck on the end of a board, so as to fracture the rings of the trochea or windpipe, and that injury produced a continuous dis coloration and ring around his neck : the boy did not die ; 1 saw a man in Etna who hanged himself, but I did not make a post mortem ; I was pres ent at the dissection of a subject in Philadelphia, who was said to have been banged; Mrs. Schurkley, of Tar entum, fell down stairs at a camp meeting and remained unconscious for an hour. Question —It is not unusual, is it, for persons to be unconscious for hours at camp meetings ? Answer —Xo, sir. Defence here called twenty witnesses to prove that defendant's reputation for peace and order was good. On cross-examination several of the witnesses admitted they had heard of trouble between Lefevre and the de ceased woman ; that they heard he had threatened to shoot his daughter Belle if she followed him again when he went to court the woman now dead, and some of the witnesses heard of him threatening to kill his first wife when on her death bed. Defence rest?. Prosecution show in by Su>--an, Joseph "and William Harbison, that deceased was not subject to faint ing spells. Dr. King, of Snxonburg. was recalled to contradict Dr. Lee, and said he did not see how a stroke on the front of the neck could make a ring clear around the neck. On cross-examination the Doctor Baid that down at Saxonburg, especi ally in the Dutch rows, he had seen a good many injured necks. Dr. Pillow followed in the same effect as to Dr. Lee's testimony. Both sides rest at 5 P. M. Defence presented some ten points, and Col. Thompson made i powerful argument for an hour on the sixth point: "That one inference or theory cannot l>e based upon or drawn from another presumption, inference or the ory." Court adjourned to Saturday, for proceedings on which and subsequent days sec editorial article. Mr. Bayard's Speech of 1801. Warper's Weekly.l A sj»eech of Mr Bayard's at the be ginning of the rebellion has just been published, and, as is said, at the insti gation of Mr. Tilden or of his friends. But as most things which bear upon the Democratic canvass are attributed to the agency of Mr- Tilden, this par ticular story niav be believed or not without affecting the fact that the pub lication is an important political event. Mr. Bayard's faithful friend, the Xew York World, takes the hull by the horns. It declares that the Democratic party can not evade its own record, and that Mr. Bayard's speech is a sound statement of the Democratic at titude during the war. The World maintains that although Mr. Bayard advocated acquiescence in secesfion as an accomplished fact, he did not defend the principle, and that doing this he really did no more than Mr. Greely. Moreover, the World holds that Mr. Bayard's position in lßfil will not harm him in 1880, if Mr. Tilden's po sition at the same time did not pre vent, as the World believes, bis elec tion in 187fi. If the speech has been published to help Mr. Tijdeu's chances, it is curi ous that the instigator should not have seen that it would inevitably provoke the retaliation of a plain exposure of Mr. Tilden's war record. This was made during the canvass of 187und it is familiar to every one who remem bers the days of the war. However much of a secessionist Mr. Bayard may have been, Mr. Tilden was a chief Cop perhead. If the honors of a Democratic nomination are to be awarded to a Democrat who in every way chilled and embarassed and denounced a vig- orous prosecution of tliri war for the Union, and fed the flame of hope in the breast of the rebellion, no one more richly merits them than Mr. Tilden. He or his friends have chosen, by re publishing this speech, to arouse the old war feeling, and to appeal to the memories of the war days. Did they renlly suppose that Mr. Tilden's chances would be improved bv such an appeal 1 However deep Mr. Bayard may be in the mud, Mr. Tilden is still deeper in the mire. He not only denounced the formation of the Republican party as a blunder or a crime, he was not only a member of the Tweddle Hall Convention which denied the right of the government to "coerce" a State, he not only declared with the rest of his party that the war was a failure, but he was one of the founders of the So ciety for Diffusion of Political informa tion, whieh was a "literary bureau" to provide for the* poisoning of the public mind during the war by every form of opposition to the government, and of apology for slavery and rebellion. What word or deed of Mr. Tilden dur ing the war friendly to lilwrty or to the struggle of the Union can IK; now recalled? If it had fallen to him to save the Union, he would have bought its salvation by still more abjeet sub mission to the slave power, or he would have suffered it to IK; destroyed It is a ludicrous stroke of policy upon the part of Mr. Tilden's friends to chal lenge an inspection of his "war record." THERE will L*> no "blundering" AT; well, in fact, might he charge that it Chicago and no kicking in the traces j waH , JfJj no { him, who in the Legisla afterward, provided fair play is allowed j A . ~ rr in tbe (wleetion of .Jni „,J the ture voted or tbr repe.l of the T0,,. vote of tbe majority of the party is , nft g e tax bill, after having pledged and respected. But there is no telling what promised our constituents we would may happen, there and afterward, if no t do so. We might go on with a the popular will is defied and j on „ |j gt 0 j j,j fl unfaithful betrayals thwarted by "machine" power. W ill , , ... i . our "unit rules" think of this? (live 0< lhw l mrt - v he d,B « rweß and diahon the people a ehaima Alvatltnllr. Jour - ors. Hut the above is sufficient for ng.l. 1 tbe present-- Soojo others ore een so misled in this case as to be in the least a party to what is now an apparent trick of Thomas Robinson. We have in our pocket the letter sent us bv the Judge, in which there is no request for its publication and for the publication of which he never asked us, nor did he ever complain to us of its non-publication, nor express any desire for or disappointment for its not being published. But on the contrary, in the pretence of witnesses, he confessed, on the first and only occasion we have since met him, that he had been de ceived at Harrisburg; that he was there told and led to believe, as we stated last week; "That Errett (the Grant candidate for chairman of the State Convention) was a good Blaine man." Now this is the point in the matter. We know how our delegates voted in the Convention. Mr. Robinson was there. Will he now please state how and for whom our delegates did vote in the general caucus, held the even ing before the convention? We have very reliable information, as we have heretofore said, as to the declarations of one of our delegates, while at Har risburg, that his preliminary votes would all have, of necessity, to be in the interest of Don Cameron. If this is a mistake we will make any just correc tions. And as to all the other matters in the Eagle last week, we say let the Re publican votes of this county have an early and fair chance to decide between us, and we will abide their verdict. We think we know what more than two-thirds of them think and will say in regard to recent |>olitical events in this county, and we know they are honest men and only desire a chance to be heard. THE cry of the Eagle last week is the "Htop thief" cry of the escaping thief. He. Thomas Robinson, charges us exactly with what he has been guilty of himself on various occasions since he introduced the Ea'jW here as an intended source of mischief. At first, and for some years, he announced his paper was ' independent." And so indeed it was "independent;" enough so to lead him to oppose Re publicans at the polls and to affiliate with the Democrats. It was such an "independent Repub ican journal" that he even supposed he could have the name of a nominee of the Repub lican party at his head and the name of the nominee of another party in its body, to-wit, the Grant and Greely campaign of 1872. As well might lie now charge that it was us, the CITI CEN, and not him, that was acting the deceitful hypocrite in 1872. As well might he charge that it was us, and not him, that in the same year printed mixed tickets, with names of nomi nees of both parties thereon, for the purpose of deceiving voters. As well might he charge that in the following year, 1873, it was us, and not him, who tried by every triek and effort to defeat one of the Republican nominees of this county for the Assembly. As recent, and the half has not yet been told. One in particular is of a very recent date, but as it mtirht not Ik> po litical in its purpose we forbear at pres ent. And on the other hand, in an swer to bis insinuations, he knows well that we have never bolted a Republi can ticket. Since we have been a Re publican we have never even scratched off a regular nominee. And since editing this pajier we have never, not iu one single year, failed to vote for and support the names standing at its head. To the old Republicans of the county we know that it is unnecessary for us to be making the above reply to the Eagl?, but as there arc some in the county now who might believe its charges, we have thought the above proper, and in conclusion have only to say, that if it thinks it profitable to further pursue this theme of party fidelity we will hold ourselves ready to further respond. The Bribery Trials. Proceedings in and the result of the bribery trials at Harrisburg last week, growing out of the corrupt action in the Legislature last winter on the Riot claims bill, will be found in our paper this week. The lirst of the proceedings will be seen on the fourth page of this paper. Four of the principal defend ants, Messrs. Kemble, Salter, Runt berger and Crawford, it will be seen pleaded guilty to the charges against them. This was a surprise and gave an unexpected turn in matters. The gen eral opinion is that these pleas of guilty were entered in order to save from ex posure others back of and behind the parties indicted, and that the Pardon Hoard will be resorted to for pardons. llow this may be we cannot say; but one thing is apparent, that if this course is pursued, to save men from punishment who have violated the fundamental law of the State, the New Constitution that the |»eople of this State have been to so much lalwr and expense in getting formed, it will create an alarm and indignation that will cer tainly be damaging to all concerned. It was with great difficulty the cases reached a trial, and the result is one of the most important for the future pu rity of our legislation that has ever happened in the State. We cannot be lieve the fears entertained that the Governor and the pardoning power will vet interfere and defeat the laws of the land on an evil that has so long been complained of by the people and that has made Pennsylvania the subject cf reproach and shame. The Census. Supervisor Richmond was called upon the other day for information concerning the appointment ot enume rators and the taking of the census in this district. Upon being asked how soon the appointments of enumerators would be made, he answered: "As soon as I get my commission. The commissions are all held back until the Senate confirms all the Supervisors in this State—at least so Gen. Walker in forms me." "Are applications for appointments still coming in?" "Yes, and I wish you would say that all applications should be forwarded at once to me, for as soon as my commission arrives, I shall nominate the enumerators, and any whose applications are not in will, of course, stand no show."— Mcadrille Jon rnal. The above, coming from Meadville, is the most direct and satisfactory of any news we have yet had as to Cen sus matters in this district. As the news we published from Washington last week indicated, and as we have thought all along, no one Supervisor of a State, although his appointment may be among those confirmed by the Sen ate, will receive his commission and be put to work until the Supervisors for all the other districts in that State are also confirmed. And this being now seen to 1M? the case it may be some time vet before the enumerators will be ap pointed in this district as all of the President's appointments ot Supervis ors (or this State have not been con firmed, but on the contrary a bitter con test between the President and the U. S. Senators from this State is going on relative to some of the same. Hut the latter part of the above from the Meatlville Journal is the moat in teresting to the many applicants for enumerators. It was supposed Mr. Richmond, the Supervisor, when ready fur work, would visit this and the different counties for the purpose of arranging sub-districts and learn ing also who were the proper applicants to appoint as enumerators. Hence manv good applicants have not go ten up petition*, to which we all know names are so easily procured but waited uu till they could be more satisfactorily recommended. l!ut from the above it is surmised, and we hope this fear may not prove correct, that Mr. Rich mond has entrusted this matter to one or two persons here. We understand two certain persons here give out the idea they have coutrol of the naming of the enumerators for liutler county— and that all applicants will be appointed through them—we mention no names at present, hut if it proves correct the j>eople of this county shall know it in due time and the effect in a political way will lie quite different from what is sought for by these persons. THE Eagle in its des|>erate and lengthy effort last week to justify itself in taking from the County treasury what is commonly called "the one hundred dollar eteal," coners he would not. And that is the law, be the motives of the Sheriff in this case what they may. But what we wish to refer to in this, is the Ea gle's self conviction from its own state ment at the close of its article last week. It says, there was 'almost a parallel" case happened to this paper, the CITIZEN, "some four or five years ago," and happening too, it states on political grounds, and in which the commissioners "refused to pay him (the CITIZEN) for it." Now why did they refuse ? He, Thomas Robinson, gives the reason himself, and he knows, for he was in truth and fact the whole cause and instigator of the then trouble, lie says, it was because "the Sheriff." mark you, "the Sheriff,"' "did not give the CITIZEN the proclamation for publication." Now there you have it Mr Robinson The "Board refused" you say, and refused because the Sher iff had not ordered it published in the CITIZKN. This decision then was made upon the legal ground that the Sheriff had control of that matter, and it don't alter the case a bit, in a legal point of view whether the CITIZKN "two years afterwards" secured pay for it, or not. He says, two years afterward and by "importunities" it was paid. The Eagle had not to wait so long. By "importunities" it got the money in less tLan two months time. So here that honest and consistent editor will see how "chickens come home to roost," and how necessary it is for a double dealing, tricky man, to have a better memory than he seems to have. We take his statement as we find it last week, but at the same time his "facts" are very wide off the mark. The Lofevre Case. A pretty full synopsis of the evi dence given in the trial of John Le fevre, charged with the killing of his wife, will be found upon the first and second pages of the CITIZEN this week. The trial commenced on Monday of last week and ran through the whole week. The evidence, however, was nil in by Friday evening, occupying about four days in being taken. The counsel for the prisoner then submitted to the Court the legal points, ten in number, which they regard should govern in the case. The arguments on these points occupied the balance of Friday's sitting of the Court. On Saturday morning the pleading to the jury commenced, being opened by District Attorney Forquer, for the Commonwealth, who was followed by Mr. Greer for the defence, and he in turn by Mr. Bowser for the Common wealth. These three speeches occu pied the whole of Saturday, when Court adjourned to Monday morning. The jury remained at their hotel, the Willard House, over Sunday. They did not attend any church during the day. On Monday morning 0 o'clock the Court reassembled, when Mr. Media tion addressed the jury for the pris oner and was followed by Mr. Thomp son nu the same side, who finishod his remarke about 3 o'clock p. in., when Mr. McOandless followed and closed for the prosecution continuing his re marks until near o'clock, when Court adjourned to Tuesday morning at '.I o'clock Dnring these speeches on Monday the Court 110u.4e room was crowded to an extent never known be fore and the greatest interest mani fested in the trial. Tuesday morning Court met and the jury wascharged by Judge Rredin. The charge of the Court embraced the law of homicide fully and recapitu lated the evidence in the case. It was two hours and ten minutes in being delivered, commencing l at !• o'clock and ending at 10 minutes past 11 o'clock. The jury was then retired to their room. TIIK VERDICT. The jury came hark into Court about half-past three o'clock and ren dered a verdict of "guilty of murder in the second degree.*' The punish ment of this degree of murder is im prisonment in the penitentiary not ex ceeding twelve years. We hear it said that when the jury first went out they stood four for conviction in the first degree to eight for second degree. None, we learn, were for an entire acquittal. A motion for a new trial, it was an nounced, will !»e made by the defend ant's counsel on Tuesday next, to which time the Court adjourned If the motion is not entertained by the Court we presume sentence will soon follow. And thus stands the Lefevre ease at present. Guilty of Wrong. Some people have a fashion of con fusing excellent remedies with the nia*s of "patent medicines," and in this they are guilty of wrong. There are some advertised remedies fully worth all that is asked for them, and one at least we know of—llop Bitters. The writer has had occasion to use the Bitters in just such a claimate as wo have most of the year in Bay City, and has always found them to be first class and reliable, doing all that is otafeff*} fx fnfrwt* Stiil Silent. We Lave carefully road both the Mer-' err Dinpatch and Butler Eagle every week since the Convention and we have failed to find the slightest indica tion in either that their editor-delegates are inclined to obey the instructions given them before the HarrisburgCon- j vention. Perhaps they think thev will wait until they can lie sure which can-' didate will be noiiunated—Blaine or Grant—before they announce which set of instructions they will obey. Hut j we are inclined to the belief that it will be necessary for them to announce their intention very soon. They both know well enough the movement which is on foot in this district, and they ought to tell at once what they will do aud what they will not do. Impossibilities will uot l>e a>ked of them. They are not instructed to vote for Mr. lilaine first, last and all the time, but to use every honorable means to bring about his nomination. Such instructions give the delegates sufficient freedom and should be obeyed in a loyal and just spirit, because they represent the wishes of the great majority of Repub lican votes of this district. If Gen. Grant were the choice of the Republi cans of this district, the Journal would insist that the delegates should vote for him. no matter who might be its choice. We insist upon fair play— aud nothing more—upon delegates who shall be governed by the wishes of those who made them delegates, and not by the wishes of men who, how ever meritorious their party services and however great their abilities, have no right to subvert the rights of the great Republican party of Penn sylvania to their own personal use aud ail vantage.— Crawford J ournal. The Latest Pension Bill. The Committee on invalid Pensions in Congress has unanimously agreed to report favorably the bill providing for the payment of arrears of pensions to to the widows and minor heirs of sol diers who die. No. HO, Dec. Term, IN7». Subpieua returned N. ft I. Alias subpwna returned N. E. 1. Bo answer* W. H. norma w, HheritT. To Mir rwpendent, Llna BoeUmr : You are hereby untitled to be anJ appear. In vour own proper PERSON, before our .JIHIKCS at Butler, at a Court of Common P ens there to tie In Id lor tlio county i f liutler, on the Mi hi Monday ot June Term, ISM), being th« 7t'< day ol said month, to answer the pillllon or liltcl ot the sii.l Paul Boehme, an I to show cause, il anv you have, why the said Pant Bot'bine, your husband, should n't be divorced troin the bonds ol nulrimoiiy, ii'ieeablv to Mic Act ol Assen.bly In su< h cane made and provided. niai 17 W. 11. HOFFMAN, Sheriff. Appeals from Assessments. The Court of Appeal* f<>r tin- Townwhips and Boroughs ol this county, will l>e held at the County Commissioners' Office, in Under, Pa., in follows : Adams township... April 12 Allegheny township ' Butler ' 1" Brady township " 'I Buffalo township " Concord township Clay township . " Clinton township " 21 Centre township 21 Clearfield township Cherry township " I'' Cranberry township " 2» Connoiptenessiug township.., 1 W Donees I township " 7 Fairview township " Forward township " 2fi Franklin township " 27 Jackson township " Jefl'enon township " 2 s Lancaster township " 20 Muddycreek townshij " 15 Mereer township # Marion township " 13 Middlesex township " 2!» Obkland township " 1' Parker township " "» Penu township " Siitiiiiiit township " V SlipperyriK-k lownship '. " I!' Venango townshij " U Washington towmhip " I • Winfleld township May 3 Worth township April It! Marrisville through May I , llutlcr borough Aj>ril 24 ] Centreville borough , 1 26 Fairview borough " '> MUierstown borough " 7 Prospect borough " 27 Portersrille borough " 23 Petrol in borough May ft Saxonburg borough April SO Kara* City borough m ? 7 « Zelieuople borough & Harmony borouffn Snnbury borough.... - ' 29 Bv order of Commissioner*. S, McCLYMONDH, Clerk. Ocw'n o&m BM*: tS, vrni OPENING DAILY e. t mm. I TIIK LARGEST AND BEST ASSORTMENT OF Boots and Shoes To be found in any House In Western Pennsylvania, em bracing all the Newest Spring Styles in the Market. OLD PRICES. 3; Recoiled* NO ADVANCE. *^§36 Several lines of Boot? and Shoes at even lower prices than ever. All my customers have the benefit in buying by getting Boots and Shoes that come direct from the manufacturer to my house. No middle profits to divide up that parties are compelled to pay that buy from jobbing houses. This Stork of Boots and Shoes is \ en io the Following Lines: Ladies' Kid and Pebble Button Boots, .... $1 50 and upwards. " " " " Side Lace Boots, ... 1.25 " " " Grain, Pebble and Kid Button and Polish, - 1.25 " " " " Polish, 95" " " " Standard, very prime, 1.25 " " "• Serges, in Congress and Polish, - • - - 75 to sl. " Calf Peg Shoes, all warranted. MY STOCK EMBRACES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE ABOVE. A FULL LINE OF ALL THK FIN EH OBAPKB IS WOMEN'S, MISSES' AND OHILPRKN'S. The C3ei»t*' I>*p»r'nt*nt is very complete iu every line in Calf Buttou, Pom Pedros, Congress and English Walking Shoes, and especially in Calf Boots, at $2 and upwards, Brogans and Plow Shoes, at $1 and upwards. Fine Buff Alexis and Congress, at $1.25 and upwards. Low Strap Shoes, in every style, at $1 25 and upwards. Boys' and Youths' Shoes in il Properly, km EquMilzod by (he <-<». C'ouimiasloners, oT the Several Township* and Horougli* of Under County, for the Yenr l*wO. 73 II >r>< - ami Z M . '£■ H < ■ < g Cattle over ■» g ! g 1£ § t c c year*. ,«g % JS x ~ '<•'<» T> £ - I- 3T < \ O \ o i ~ -• £ =■ 2, JT» 2. PIHTRTCTB. £ § r"— B £ ' 59 * : b 4. o* j - » c : 3 0 : 3 b ci ; 5- ' B ! i ' I » i 11 III; iif * ; ; : I t : \S* w ship 224 750 13,500 5,415 -*tO,«KK> j 11,614 273,704 1,000 3,420 Itrulv township 176,206 4,.> I.omi 6,050 102.200 !So^wSr P :::::::: *4* nm w: , jw «» m Conoorl township 407,01.1 14,,03 <,l7* 18,64* 11,000 447,503 1,0 280 pi.* Kinriuliin 27>1.421 11,410 t>,2o< 2,<55, 3,600 271,883 Clinton townihip 257,600 11,2-V! .">,630 5,000j 2,t>7.i 200.53(1; 075 60 Centre to wn*h' 232 85«' W. 497 5,880 -',676' 0,406 251,920 400 aras 2W» -i..W2 3,302 2,000 • 228,34s 1 215 Cherr* township 242 117 12,043 «,OW> 3,655 8,000 203,884 350? !»40 raXrlTtowte.::... • 262/22# :•.:< • ( 4,5.f. I,«MN. CoiinoouenPisinif township 25?»,!<5 12,403 .'.7A7 5,7 tH); ; 1u,1j7. 283,53fi, 75 1,746 l.'«ipvirw township ,*.IL'«7;". 17,«40 7,710 .»,51»3 ti,ls<' 4,165 ■>:■*}»:"» SSfS FmnkliiL township 275,880 '.<»> 5,241 3,5(0 ' 1.1,1/4, J.t4,440. iifi, 1,537 leflcrson townnhip 2«iJ,574 7,!'3l 4.M4 4,!XW: . 12,1150 27P.10#, 200 5K7 »i« ufcj. mjs : ,™,S Mutl'lvereek tow.ishi,. <,.«*• I.J« , «.«5 ; 2«4,220 100 1,4.0 Mercer township 144.090 ».0. ? ' 12,<20 , 785' 1«5,745 50 M<«ri«m liiwimhin . r >,2»»- l.fwO. <•> I]K» w MSTHIS township. ....1:.... 27«:.54!» »«.202 4,480 ; 7,150 2W.1M1 23k, 800 Oaklaml f.wnshi, 230,0.16 8 4.K 4,910 1 «.0 . *.,£ 244.706 500 Pirki r townxhii> . ..1 11 4,4(H) ..0,4*0 4-. H J,468 50U ( . a4O , 3,400 7ti, ™ 2,6.0 j 1,2.x. Petrolia borouL'h.... j 43,200 46.720 170 Hawnburv borough , _ L , K Sunhury tH»rtiuich... •!/.««• ( . . !«8 /eliei.ople borough i ; .7- . 7 40S Harmony By order of Co«,ty fomtnissaionen., gM i (' L YMONDS, Clerk. Cominifurfonora' Btttltr, Pa., March 15, I*#o. " n" m w ~ BOOT ? SHOE STORE, UINIOIH BLOCK, Main Street, ... - Butler, Pa. Ru.fir Has received liis entire stock of Fall and Winter BOOTS and SHOES. As I have an unusually large and attractive stock of HOOTS A SHOES just opening, embracing all the newest styles, I invite the attention and close scrutiny of buyers. Men's Kin and Calf Hoots vcrv cheap. Ladien', Mists' and Children's Button, Polish and Side Lace Hoots in endless variety, and at bottom prices. Reynolds Brother*' celebrated fine Shoes alwayß in stock. Partiea wanting BOOTS A SHOES made to order can do no bettor than by me, as I keep none but the best of workmen in my employ. I also keep a !»rge stock of LEATHER and FINDINGS. 1 good* warranted a* rwt*«*»ted. MtCFF«