== ily see, dnd correct the evil. The latter - rged - the peculiar relations of Georgia with -the General Government, as presenting a strong claim upon me not to refuse the in vitation which had been given to me. I • yielded to these suggestions, and took my • place in Cabinetoisth - o, firm determine ' tion to avoid the mmt rove rsies XihiaTkarecl might occur.. -To that determination I have steadily r adhered. • Associating on terms of courtesy with ree colleaguesoy Oficial inter ,,,couree with them was never interrupted by discord. - 'lf there was any COMbinationsgmwing out of the aupposed con liethetween the interests ofMT. Calhoun and Mr. Van Buren, I had no par Lin thene---and as , little in the supposed measurossof character, having for their object to coerce Major Eaton to retire from the Cab inet—or to exclude his family from the so ' piety of Washivtori; -- -- With mine they did not associate ; but no advance hhd been made , on either side, and their.actual relation seem ed therefore to furnish no just ground of of • fence to either party. In this posture of things, and shortly after I had given an eve ning party to which Mrs. Eaton had not been invited, I received and heard with infinite sur prise the message of Col. Johnson. ...„.01 could make no mistake as to its charac ter, for there was a direct and repeated re • ference to the large parties, which have been then recently given by Messrs. Branch and Ingham, and myself. Such a mistake, if it bad been one, would have been instantly cot ' rwtedi-from the nature of my reply. If the - complaint had been of a combination to evict Major Eaton tram office, and not to exclude - -his/amity from society, the reference to - - I these evening parties would have been idle --aad-my-declaration that_l xvould not permit the PresidtinftWairittotthelectil intercourse of myself and family, would have been in stantly met by an explanation which would • bays removedthe impression from the minds :rare:hand Ingham, and myself. Yetsve-all partedwitli .Col. Jolmiem, with a, clear conviction that such a proposition had .been made, and feeling as we all did, that an indignity had been offered to us, there was, as I believN no difference of opinion between Mae to the Course we ought teilprsue ; if this . proposition should be - avowed 311'd pressed by •the .President. This conversation took place on Wednes _ llay_evening, and the rumor of our intended removal speedily became general -- --succeeding day, the personal friends of Gen. Jackson interposed, and he was awakened to a tense of the impropriety of his projected lOuril34 - 11 - iSiii then according to - Col: Jolin . son's statement to Mr. Ingham that the paper *poker' of by the editor of the Globe was pre paied. My two colleagues hid theirinter view-with the President on the succeeding day, (Friday) and as Mr. Ingham's statement madefromfull notes taken at the time, proves no paper roan shown to him on that occasion. Owing to a mistake in the communication of - -thePresident'a_wisheii to me, I didnotsee_ him until the succeeding day, (Saturday) and then the excitement of his feelings had so en ' tirdyinibsided, - thlit he-seemed to me _to be anxious ba dispose of the subject as briefly as possible, He spoke of the falsehood of the reports against Mrs. Eaton, of which he said he had sufficient proof; and upon my declin ing to diaeuss that question, he complained of the• injustice of excluding her from so ciety: referred to the large parties given by -Messrs. Ingham and,Branch, and and told me if he could have been convinced that that there was a combination between those gentlemen and myself to exclude her from sopiety, that hewould--havorequiretiottr- • sigaations. - _He immediately added, that he was entirely satisfied that there had been no such combination, and again referred to those -and. te the- Tumours to which they given rise, as having produced that! hnpremarion. SO far from them suggesting that information had when eiv from any • • ems,n I -claimed-the r.• emarnasofiusypersona who., had made to him representations unfavorable to my conduet, he stilt refeited - to the thou= teintrurnors which had- reached him as the origio of such impression which had been made upon. his mind.- Ile showed me no pa. per--spoke to me of none—intimated to me natertag which he would hereafter require:. By his declaration that he did not intend to preis the requisition which he had made • through Col. 'Johnson, I considered , the ob ject ofthe.Anterview to be ter exphrin to me the motives under which . he had acted,. and loannounce-thechaveof his detennination: I Ile accompanied • this with expressions of personal kindness, which I thought were in - - • tended to soothe the feelings which fie must • have been concious,,of• havins t' excited- Still-I thought it was improperfor me long er to remain in the Cabinet. Admitting that sufficient atonement had been made for the Indignity offeitaibS , the message sent through • • Cot. Johnson, there was perpettud liability bo the recurrence ofsirnilar•outrages. I be %eyed it, therefore, to be my duty to retire: . My friends thought otherwise, and my own sense of what the interests of Georgia it that partieider crisis Tequired, induced me to re • , press-my ißielings- When at a subtequent period, the contra itorsy occurred between the- President and Vies President, I thought' saw in.this; the - ,efridence of art intention again to agitate the treation, which by the agency of the per. • , euda kif Genera] . Jackson;Tind been 'appilv repressed, The connection Nil_ • ' ‘' Crawf9rd with this il .controversy, and lkebWrkiebgeo,lV-t0 %mid Jackson, f0r ,,15#40 taktriulY par t•in it-and I studiously ' - linklact all interferenceorteept to defrecate Ir.`Otibobit's publication. left Washing , the 4th of April, one 'day after Major annolinced to the, President his t_tim)tion to res ign , . according to the inliiititu.Eatort's) letter of re. SIM r , •4. EMI ps _ B i 4] I 1 4 , 1 3 10 j( RitJaVISMEZa signation, and not the slightest intimation was given to the of the intended change in the Cabinei. But when t saw the cprres pondence between thv President and the se veral Heads of Departments, I could, not doubt' for a thoment how,: and by whom, disSolition kid been produced. I did not Te - eTiit liberty io - expreSS — thy views general ,- ly-,-- until my return to Washington should enable me to dissolve my connection with . - . . the President; but to a few friends who had the righrto understand my actual position, I stated the utter impossibility of my con tinuance in the Cabinet, unless the President coulti_place_.the retirement of my.colleagnes on other grounds than these which I believ ed to have occasioned it, and such ns I could approve In full view of the srieedy - disso lution dull_connection .hetw•een the Presi- dent. and myself,.l availed myself of the oc casion allbrded by the kindness ofroy. fellow• citizens of Savannah, to do an act of justice to his'Public conduct, on a question vitally interesting, to the people of Georgia. •I there be any man who is incapable ofunder stand ing, or of appreciating theAfrotive . Which prompted this act, I cannot envy his feelings, and will not attempt to enlighten his Under standing. I returned to this city, had a con versation with the President, of which the prominent points are adverted to in my let ter of resignation which immediately follow ed it, and having brought up the public busi ,ness, which was in arrears retired from office. While these occurrenceswere in progress, Major. Eaton addressed to me a letter of like import with hiS first communication to Mr. Ingham. He called upon me to sanction or disavow. the statement in the Telegraph, that . my family had refused to associate with his. I answered by • detailing. the conversation --which-lact-passed—between_ myself and. Co!. Johnson, and stated that I had subsequently expressed the same views to the President, who had disclaimed any dfsposition to press this requisition, referring to that which I had previously stated to - have - been-made through Col.. Johnson. i The Editor of the Globe has published,this detached sentence of my let ter, And his made an impotent attempt to distort its Meaning. The public shallijudge •of the whole correspondence. Perfecily sat . isfied that it would at all times speak for it self, and not emulous of reputation to be ac quired in such controversies, I have resisted the numerous calls which have been made -upon-methrough ditferent_journals-tagiveit. to the public. But the Editor of the Globe is in possession of it, and by the publication of an isolated extract attempts to do me in justice. I exercise a right, therefore, which belongs to me, when I take from him, this unfair means of annoyance, by giving the whole to the public: Friday night,l7th June, 1831. Sir: I have studied to disregard the abu sive slander which have arisen through so debased a source as the U. S. Telegraph. I have been content to wait for tfkg fill de veldp_ment of what he had to say, and until persons of respectable character should be brought forth to endorse his vile abuse of me, and my tinnily. *ln that paper of this even ing is contained the following remark of my wife: "It is proven that the Secretaries of the Treasury and of the Navy, and of the Attorney General, refused to associate with her." This publication appears in a paper which professes_to be friendly_ to you, and is brought forth under your immediate eye.-' I desire to know ofyoti, whether or not you sanction this statement; or disavow it. The_ relation-we have sustained towards each oth er authorizes the to demand an immediate reaper J. H. EATON. JNo. M. BERRIEN, Esq. 13... WA HINGTON, 18th June, 1831. -,„ ..„ Sin:A—A received to-day, yuur note of las night, in-Whieh-youAmil my attention to_an article in the United States Telegraph of the 11th instant', relating to your wife--and de siring to know Whether I will sanction or dis -avow that-statement.„.you.add,ifilii :telation we have sustained towards each other,autho izes me - . to demand Im - immediate -answer." Tothis enquiry preferred as a matter of, l I right, and presented in the form of a demand my answer must be brief. ,It consists in the simple denial of the claim' which you assert. I cannot recognize your right to interrogate me, concerning the statements of the Tele graph, or of any other public. Journal', which are made without.my agency: You might with equal propriety selection article from any newspaper in the Union, forihe purpose of putting me to the question—and' if the claim which you assert be well founded, I might be required at the instance of any per t son aggrieved to give my confeision efTaith, in relation to the various statements 'to be found in any of the Journals in which my naine may chanctAp tar iiiieataile#: Such edemand, therefore, cannot be admitted for a moment. But although I carnet roxog-' nine your right, eilher as derived from thee relation which we have sustained towardi each other, or from,tuty other source, to make the demand presented by your note, I am not quite sure, lopking to .the positiou'in which we stand 'before the public, that . ' can acquit myielf to the community or to nay. ,1 self for declining to, nswer your inquiry,r-• H I . In the progress of these events which have at lengthrestated in the dissokitioriOf the cabinet, my determination has been not to do any act which - Wastealculated to eovige eou-, troverq; nor to deViate under .wfmtares qt. , gooey &Ili that line of conduct whiehlny own sense of propriety prescribed.' 'Acting. upon this determination, I have necessarily pursued a course,'which a refusal to =swig lotir inquiry, might Seem to indicate an Mi. willingness to avow. Siich an 'intermit* - wou lik iti be unjust as it regaidemyself, and'iret lueive ' a elitibn to . the puttlip _ Aitho* thereto e I have the most muiffboted reloct- Ande I entel'itipo sti4 a sake i, 4 cepkin- ly do not acquiesce in your right to demand it., it seems to Me ,that you have by matiting the inquiry, imposed upon me the obligation to do so, from' just consideration of iihat I owe to myself and to the public. 'I have then to state to you; - thatitp-to the'. time of your marriage, I had'tiot heard the ruinort, which •have-since-hr varioterformai 2 been presented to the public,. and was ignorant of Mrs. Ea ton's relation to the society of this place. I accepted your invitation to be present at.! your wedding therefore, with no distrust of the propriety of my doing' o, other than that which resulted from my..own situation at that pe'riod. You are, yourself no doubt" ifirviir-e -how anuch that event, and your subsequent introduction into the Cabinet, made' these rtnnotti-s the subject of conversation. I could not longer continue -in ignorance of that which was ptiliticly and generally spoken of, audit...consequently became necessary for me, embarrassed as the questiOn was, by the official relation it Which we stood to each, other, to deterinine upon Illy future conduct. In doing this it did not seem to me to be ne cessary to decide upon the truth or falsehood of the statements which were made: It was sufficient to ascertain the' general sense of the community of which I had recently be come a member; and having done 50,,t0 con form to it. In the winter of 1830 as ',pre sume is known to you, I was called upon by a gentleman who represented himself as act ing, and who I doubt not, did act under the authority of the President, to express .with precise reference to this subject the regret which he-felt at the want of harmony, or of social intercourse among the members of the Cabinet, and to announce his determination at any rate to have it. Messrs: Ingham lind Branch were present at this interview. The fact was distinctly stated-that they and-my selfhad successively given very large parties to which Mrs. Eaton had not been invited.— We were then told that on such occasions at least the President would expect in future a -social intercourse between our respective families.. There wore various suggestions. made during their conversation, but the re, capitulation is • not .rendered necessary .by your inquiry. I answered,to this commun ication for myself, that I 4dtlia - not permit • the President, nor any other individual to regulate the social intercourse of myself or family----and that if such a requisition was persevered in, I would, retire from the offici- Al situation which I held. In the interview to which I was invited by the President some few days afterwards; I frankly expressed to him my views on this subject, and he dis claimed any disposition to press such a"re ; quisition. lam not aware that any other oc casion has occurred in which the question of lan intercourse betweenyour family and mine has been presented, to me or to my farni . I am, respectfully, your obd't serv't. JOHN MACPHERSON BERRIEN. To J. H. E.a'rox, Paq. , ~ , , n -111 . 0 - -xnai Monmico; 8 o'clock. -- i S helve received your note of the 18th inst; -It may becnme necessary me to offer something in - reply. For the present I have engagements whiCh prevent me from I doing MOrethan tostcknowledge that it has been received. Very respectfully; 20th Jurie,lB3l. 'J. H. EATON. Mr. BEM:IEN. . . _ SIR: I have not had leisure to reply to your letter ofthe 18thuntil to-day. It involv ed matter which-it behoved me to give a full and calm consideration to. That has been given. - I felt indisposed to „believe that these at tacks of Gen. Green could be authorized by vou, or were made under your mire Your declaration is evidence of the correct ness of itiatt:4,.,.was befoie impressed. with.— I take oecasion,themfore, with pleasure, to ackhowledge the frankness with which you hava,iiisavowed aa - agericyin_ this nefarious business: Respectfully, your most obed't. BEnnrim-Esit. • -(Conclusion _nextweek.j.. FOrzzoN Nrwt3. Alooily conflict in Poland— Aldvance of the Russians—Re treat of the Poles, kc. -.By the .packet ship SylVanus Jenkins, Captain Allen s the New York American has . receivefl ales of London papers to the Bth, and Liverpool papers to the 9th ult. The news from Poland, though as usual confused and ill-authenticated as to partied lars, leaves no aosubt but that they have sustained a disastrous reyerso. - Diebitsch, in attempting to cut off the Polish -army from Warsaw, a corps under Lubienaki, fcitced its way through his columns at the posit: of the, bayonet. This enabled Skry necki to pursue his march.with the main txtdy Lubienvki then forming the rear.— 'Upon reaching the Narew, this brave-of ficer was again attablcid, an beingtiriVen forward on the main body, h burnt the bridge, "but not so edhctively," says one account of this affair, "as to prevent its be ing. restored." 'Accordingly, Gea.Schakoffskio, support ed by a tremendoutisAillery, scicceeded in crossing -the river. A most' violent com bat ensued. The enemy vainly endeavor ed to convey large masses to the right , bank. Our-troops defended themselves most bril liantly. The carnage was dreadful, and lasted° tleveral houts, &ring which our troops in vain endeavored to force the ene my back to the other side-of the river, and• who on his Part was also striving to effect bio_purpOoe. : ( • . The' Chief point or• donteption was the bridge;`anda long elevated iiike which , pas. 'sea along the'tearaby shore'cf the Narew; and . th nature of gfisted, contributed much to give the battle a sangtity Jury char acter. They fought man to man, and thou sands were killed by being - thrown over the dike. The Russian troops displayed a de gree of courage and resolution far superior to what they had shown in the preceding tart of the 'campaign. An unusual heat increased-the labor-of- the-daY. The Rus sians threw away, their knapsaCks to be more at their ease. • At length, towards, evening, fatigued by their • exertions, and unable to overcotne the resistance of our gallant troops, the enemy withdrew to the left bank of the river, and we?] remained in , •possemion ffie - TOTd "BiittTe, --- iipiaii which the Commander-in-Chief passed the night, in order to provide for the relief of the wounded." Such are the main features of this san guinary engagement, in which about 3000 Poles, including_ vvo,genoral officers have perished. Quarter, we are told, was out of the question; the chief wurk was performed with the bayonet. Three Russian Generals fell in the engagement, and even their crowd ed ranks were thinned in this deadly struggle. The official account is as follows: The encounter of General Lubienski, on the 23d inst. with the mass of the enemy, apprised me that Field Marshal Diebitsch was, with his principal force, on the right bank of the Bug, and that any moment he could rejoin the guards. On the other hand, General Chlahowski, intrusted with conveying support to our" Lithuanian breth ren, having joined them, had secured the object of our expedition. I then gave an order to commence our retrogade move ment before forces-so superior to our own. OnAhe_24th_the reqerve, underlictl. Pax, was at Stoeryn;" Gen. Rubiiiskr ode - ivied the position of Crerwin; Gen. Lubienskt, with the corps of cavalry and the division of Gen. Henry . Kamienski, was posted near the Nodborg; and Gen Gielgud marched upon Lamzo, to occupy it. Gen. Lubienski was attacked by the Guards from Tykocin, and from Chorecto; at the same time the army of the Field Mashal arrived from the Nur. I gave orders for our troops to pass to the right bank,of the Narew, which was effect ed on the evening of the 25th, over both bridges, in the most perfect order. Gen. Lubienski commanded the rear guard, and,, to cover the passage of the army, - ke emu= pied the heights Of Zekun and of.Lawy. In' the - morning of the 26th; the positions of Gen. Lubienski were attacked with great impetuosity by the Field Marshal in person. Gen. Lubienski, retreated upon Ostrolenka making a most vigoious resistance. His march was stopped by the city itself, which had been set on fire by the mortars of the en t etry ; but, after having passed . td the right bank of Narew our army attempted to destroy the bridge. Placed, however, un der the fire of the enemy,- their success was imperfect, and they could not prevent the Russians from repairing it. This cir cumstance enabled the division of grenadiers under Price Pzakowskoi to pass over the right bank of the Narew. The enemy's division, protected by a numerous artillery, placed on a position on the opposite bank, commenced a yigorous fire. This, protect. ed the division, and presented a serious ob stacle to our attack. Nevertheless, several of our regiments of infantry andother divi sions charged the enemy with intrepidity. The combat was for a long timeone of real slaughter. We were unable to drive the enemy across, the river, and on his side, .with-the-- i gremtpat efforts, end - LW—reach its right hank, and the enemy, who had ad vanced mimerous columns,' was obliged, to retreat. Finally, the Russians, exhaust ed, towards night retired from the other side_ofthe river, leaving only some sharp. 'iiheotets on the right bank, who also retro graded as far as the bridge. Thus we re mained masters of the field of battle. - The'litittlirencled'art2'n'elockarnighc I ordered the army tie proceed' to Puling - li. This was effected withorit - the least- inter= ruption on the part of the enemy. We have not been able to aseeriamottfloss, but it is considable on both sides, both killed and wounded. We have taken some hundred soldiers and several officers. • (The report concludes with praise of the officers and men, and a promise of a.more detailed report.) , (Signed) "Conimander-in-Chief, "Pultusk, May 27." SKRZYNECKL It wilFbe observed that the Polish Com mander makes no estimate of the loss on either side, farther than to admit that "it was considerable on both , sides." Thepri vide accounts making the Russian lees 10,- 000, and that of the, Poles only 4000, are scarcely-to be believed. So great a dis parity, in numbers slain, where - both sides fought with spch desperate obstinacy and .bravery, is, incredible; • in FRANCE, we learn , the eliac'trSns qn: gage all minds casinier ,Perier has ad dressed a letter *the Perfects Ofcommunes giving directions for the formation of the electorial ,lists. The ministry are said to entertain hopes of `a small majority. ' • June 22d,1831. Report of the Commander-in-Chief. Proni ENGLAND we Kaye nothing in . ._ particular, except some accounts ,of fliiiinr. Lubienski, in his retreat of C ieehnowieo bailees in Wales, to which we hardly know with 6,000 'Poles, cut his way through 40,, what importance to attach. Such commo- 000 Russians!' - , - • tions are rare in that district; and may, in- The Poli,sli State cmetteofTutid,6, cow -. dicate a state of irling which ;will give tains two reports of Gen. Slioynechi,dated , some trouble to the . British Government., from the Head Quarters attirega;-on the .P 4. "The accounts to-daY," save a London . Pa. and 2d'of June. The fi rst givesun 'ecomikt per of the Itb, "from the distCirbed districts of the reasons (which are already :known) in Wales are very gloorny. We have_not why the army fonibt.the fettle ofOirtrelert. seen any leitters,, but it is Raid that sweaa ka, and afterwards retreated to• Prep: The:cri of rioters hid been killed; and .a consid-second report is that which gives an account 1 era ble number wounded . The Soidieni Wad pf r the defeat of a Russian corps iiiLithlsnia suffered coosidendily;' Fkhteeu .hei) been ee stated above, . f -.-. ' , •,, , \ 1 c.• severely wounded, and a detachment taken prisoners and disarmed. : his added that when the last accounts came way, the re. . maing soldiers r abeut 200 in number, the Magistrates, and upwards . of one- himdrcd of the principal people in the riei&ghborhood had taken refuge in. ,Marten Castle, the -seut_of_. Mo,..c_rawshay.,lro e rn,_wllich._they _ wereafraid to remove till, reinfotterne - nts arrived." IRELAND is in a shocking staCe,.with no prospect of relief. The dreadflil ac counts we gave the. other day from a pri. vate leter,• are thus cdnfirmed id the Dub- I iii:Everting - Post:— Famine in the ccninty are not fewer . than 150,000 men, women, and children, in a state, ofActual_starvaAion inthe'Conn+y of Mayo. This, we beg leave to say, is no exaggerated ,- statement: A census has been taken of the parishes and townlands by competent and trustworthy persons, who can depose on oath, if neces sary, to the accuracy of the retnrns. - We have seen the frightful list in the hands of the gentl4man, himself a landed prtiprictor, and one of the. most active and intelligent of the deputation now in Dublin; Sir Francis Blosse. There is, theretore,„no exaggera tion. Famine, in the horrible and strict sense of the term, is devouring in a part of the -. county alone, a population of 150,000 hnman creatures- Of BELGIUM we hear that after at length coming to a determination in the choice of a king, she is once more, by the declension of Leopold, set afloat upon the _sea of doubt lathe choice of a head to her government. • The London Times of the Bth says:—" I t appears that there is what may be called -the failitre r at-least for-thejrresent,or -the-- Belgic arrangement. The crown being on particular conditions presented to Prince Leopold, has been by him refused! "King Charles of this not having need, "Thanks on as much as if he did." was the answer that the witty Rochester gave in the person of his master to an ima ginary petition !Of the Commons tendering a mutulated .cOnsOtition • and diminished rights to the' Ring. The Belgians do not, tender a mutilated constitution to the Prince but offer more of a country than it belong; to them to give;' in consequence of which, His Royal Highness hag declined their crown. The protocols of the great Powers do not assignLimhurg and its territory 'to Belgium,. but these the*Belgians assume to themselves without leave,and invite Prince Leopold to govern the augmented state. The result is as we have' said above, that he has declined , the offer. The Belgians have now, tlierefore, to seek another King. Whom hey may find we knew not; but we must say, that he is ar bold matt who shall accept the eine'Vvn oft conditions- Weich France and England'prii hibir.• kn• fact, the Belgians have hot ad vanced' a step; they have merely chosen Prince Leopold' instead of the Duke. do 'Nemours. The other and main question are in doh, quo. .PORTUGAL affairs .seem at length to have assumed .a determinate. character,..and this is decidedly belligerent; and,. Record ing to accounts from Lisbon,. the French have commenced reprisals by capturing three Portuguese coasting vessels, off the mouth of the Tagus.. There is but little . doubt that the terms, offered,by the French Government to Don . Miguel have been re fused, and That he is already begining to feel the effects of his besotted councils. An-arrival at New York of the packet shin President, from London, brings intelli gence ten days_ later than the preceding. Mr. McLA.xn, late - Minister to England ; - nncliamilyAnalamengthe_passengethitthe= President. • The new Parliament assernblkl on • the, -in-k ranee. w A ad- - -from---the • various detail"- --- presentedTwe--extract-the-followingeoncer ning fresh advantages reported to have - bee= -gained by the brave Poles. THE POLISH REVOLUTION. Some further intelligence has been recei v.. ed from Warsaw dated June 6th, from which -it appears that a battle tonic place on the same day as that of Ostrolenka, in which General Chlapowski, the Polish General, heat the Russians, and gained a 'complete 'ctory. Thell eneral wasjoined bysevera I thousand of the Byalystock insurgents near -Narewka.,, Ile fell in with the Russians in the night, and surprised and completely sun .rounded-them. The Russians Lost all their cannon, live in number, alxl had about 300 men killed; the .rmainder of the Russians, were completely defeated and made prison ers.. At Byalostockicy, 120 Russians wag gons were taken by the insurgentii: In Vol-. 'hynlit the fortress of Hainan fell into their hands after a Well-contested and sanguinary.. battle, in.which the Missions left 1,200 dea4 on - the field of battle. General Rudiger, however, with KrassovvskesCorps,is at %Vey-. .bowiee;,he had 9,000 men under hirn, and thirty pieces_ ni cannon, .the Russians army had begun to move to the right boa of the Narew. On the 3d. inat.'lo,oo o men were encamped arErasnya, h seems ti EMI 13 RI
Significant historical Pennsylvania newspapers