Editorial opinion 'Smart' move It’s Saturday night or Sunday morning, depending on how you look at things at 2 a.m. You’re sit ting on the ‘Wall’ in front of Old Main. You’re a little too high, or a little too drunk from the last party you were at. You’ve met some friends, BS’d a little, passed around a brown bag and got a little drunker. And a little “braver.” • That’s when you decide to act. That’s when you decided to exer cise your rights and get even with cruel University officials who spend their lives devising ways to restrict students. That's when you decided to display your courage, took out a pair of wirecutters, and daringly slit the temporary fence around McCarthy's low-key campaign may mean poet as President By DAVID SKIDMORE Collegian Staff Writer Eugene McCarthy is running for President ... again. This time, with a difference he has forsaken ‘the Democratic Party and is running as an independent. He’s been running full time for over a year and a half. Yet, no one takes him seriously. What little coverage he's gotten in the press has been smugly condescending. On the presidency, McCarthy says, "One of my first acts would be to take out the White House Rose Garden. I’d replace it with humble vegetables like cabbage and squash." According to McCarthy, "You’d have trouble an nouncing war in a cabbage patch.” It would seem difficult to take seriously a man who wants to plow under the White House Rose Garden. Or would it? McCarthy is waging a campaign of philosophies more so than of issues. McCarthy's stands on most issues are not really unusual. He appeals to Democrat and liberal Republican alike. However, his ideas about the two party system and the role of the president are unusual. The two party system is obsolete Letters to the Editor The butler did it TO THE EDITOR: I disapprove of making a practice of criticizing too harshly the Collegian writers, as the paper provides good experience for young journalists. However, the careless handling of reportage by one writer has interfered one too many times with my enjoyment of a film. How did Richard Heidorn Jr. ever get the idea he was capable of writing movie reviews and who at the Collegian perpetuated this mis-conception by hiring him? Mr. Heidorn might do well writing for Cliff Notes as he has an amazing capability for summarizing plots; however, he also has an outstanding ability for ruining the climax of a suspenseful movie by plastering the denouement all over the pages of the Collegian. (“The butler did it." ‘Thank you, Mr. Heidorn.') His most recent review of Roman Polanski’s "The Tenant” was overwhelmingly incompetent. When he wasn't telling us the plot, scene by scene, he was making inane comments such as: "... we were never sure whether Trelkovsky suffers from paranoia or the director from LSD flashbacks'." I contend, Mr. Heidorn, that YOU were never sure. If your own perceptual faculties lack some understanding, don’t blame the director for your own shortcomings. Outside of a few vague judgements of this sort,, there is nothing in this “review" that even constitutes any kind of a critique. It would seem this reviewer considers things like the acting or cinematography to be unimportant details for he has chosen to circumvent them completely. Maybe Mr. Heidorn should try his hand at sports reportage, under which circumstances his Old Main lawn We salute you. For your stupidity. Contrary to your opinion, the fence was not erected as a punitive measure against students. It was not meant to be construed as a “royal job" on the part of Cam pus Security. In reality Campus Patrol had nothing to do with the barrier. It was constructed by the Office of the Physical Plant to allow tram pled grass to grow back in the area. The fencing was to be removed at the beginning of Fall Term. That was, of course, until you took it upon