PAGE FOUR Editorial Opinion For a Better Froth Lz.;.;t we(7l:, the October issue of Froth appeared on Uni:.•ersity riewstands and 'soon after its appearance, it evoked a storm of controversy., The sales record for this issue was good; 'student reaction was mixed, as our many Letters to the Editor indicate. Some students have uiged that Froth be banned by the University adminfEtration or that some sort of clearance channel be initiated to review material being prePared for publication. We defend Froth. We will fight for its staff's right to comment and express opinions freely. We are opposed to any 'censorship which could be imposed by either the University administration or the faculty. The concept of a student magazine devoted to wit and satire is a good one. There are many occurrences