THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 1952 'Heiress Features 19 th Century H air-Dos By J3ETTIE. LQUX . . . It’s the little things' that count/Often it’s''the tiniest details that make the difference beween a mediocre, amateurish production and the polished performances for which have gained a name; The' real problem in the makeup department, according to manager Ed Girod, is the hair-dos for the women.. At the; tiine of the play, the middle 1800’s, hair was worn long,. parted 'in the middle, with a bun in the back. As Ed says, “Not one woman on campus has hair like that.” In addition to having rather short' hair, most women have it tapered into different lengths, making it-’ even harder to work with; To solve this, false hair has been used on all the women ex cept Betty Lou Morgan and Isa bella Cooper. Big. Contrast Ed also found he had difficulty in transforming Kathryn Scheetz, a vivacious, attractive brunette, into the plain, , rather dowdy heiress, Catherine Sloper. Accord ing to Ed, .“Kathy looked so good she didn’t seem like Catherine in the play.” Although Kathy at first contemplated lightening her dark hair, it was finally decided that the new coiffure would do the trick Through the first act and most of the second she wears it rather severely with a spinste'rish bun in the back, in contrast to the spit-curls • and horsetail ’arrange ment designed for Regina Fried man, who plays the part of her attractive cousin.'Ed will also use makeup to “tone,'down the nicer features of Kathy’s face.” A change-in hair style in the last scene helps to convey the change in the heiress’ personality. “As Kathy matures and becomes a little wiser she gets a little more’ chic,” Ed explained. Final Rush It would seem that Charles Schulte, who plays the father, Dr. Austin Sloper,. used- his razor too hastily. Until the end of last sum mer he had his own beard and mustache. Now he must wear a false one. He is also going through the rigors of hair-dyeing, and must lacquer his naturally curly hair to straighten it out. Although the costumes were Students Devise Devious Ways To Improve Study Procedure The blissful frivolity associated with hot-dogging and loafing moves into a gloomy background as the austerity of close-approach ing finals -catches students within its grasp. Like a scorpion, the torturous two weeks reach forth with vicious tentacles, bringing students into a hopeless maze ■ of, formulas and theories, facts and dates —unfortunately the chrono logical kind. Consciences begin .to prickle, dusty books are warily removed from dustier shelves, pencil shar peners groan under overwork, and the horrible business of pre paring for finals—-postponed .un til the last possible moments—is underway. Distasteful as it all sounds) stu dents, with their characteristic inherent ingenuity, have -devised methods to make studying for finals at least a trifle less dis tasteful. ,