PAGE TWO Taking Action In carrying the fi-gnl for Collegc-sc-rvcd meals for men students to Mr. Leman, director of Col lege Dormitories and Dining Commons, "the Inde pendent Men’s Association found, as other student v-r-rJ-'-- b?-- aic'’'W"iTd. that getting the College to take action involves much, more than merely pointing ol i wiiat it believes to be a problem, and suggesting that something be done about it. The meeting between College officials con cerned with dining commons and students advo cating that the Sandwich Shop be given over to feeding men students resulted in the College throwing the problem back into the laps of the students. This action leaves IMA back just about where it started in early October. Whether .or not this is a goad thin? is debatable. It could be overused by the various officers of the College to the detriment of the student body. Obviously the strongest weapon of the College in resisting any student proposal is just plain stalling and relying on the apathy of the mass of students to let the matter die. Inaction .is -thus a very simple and convenient means of killing almost any “problem.” It, however, does not .solve the problem. This is not to sav. however, -. that the College has taken no action in this request for men's dining commons. . Mr. Lomc-ii called in the members of the pro testing student body for a nearing, at which time he asked for further proof that the problem existed. This action on the part of the College is •commendable.as il-shows that the College at' least recognizes the protest and offers to co-operate further with the student body. The preliminary survey of the dining commons situation by the College brought adverse opinion bn the request for men’s dining commons ar rangements. In two meetings the student repre sentatives failed to convince the College officials of the need for men’s dining commons. That is. .why the problem is back in the students’ hands now. - Some fault, however, may be found with the information and reasoning used by the College ,in denying the student request. 'One argument used was that men did not waijt to eat at College .'dining .commons or they would be living at Pol lock Circle where rooms are still vacant. Many students would not want to sacrifice satisfactory )own rooms st s ■■ Cair Brawn-4304 WASHED—one ride to *®Sj2L ' York Nov. 8, 2647 ask^ 1 ' Marfiie .J