A gra/41bl Nl,Jepooitorg. Wedilesdpy, April 20, 1813. Tsmtit.—s2 per annum in advance; or $2.50. If not paid within the year. All subscrip!ion ac ;Emig@ trust be settled annually. No paper will be vent out of the State unless paid for in advance. ; -ADVERTISEMENTS ate inserted at TEN cents per lino for first insertion, and FIVE cents per tine for each, subteguent insertion. Advertisements of Bye lines or less are charged 56 cents for first liner-, tlon mid 25 dents for each subsequentinsertion ; and Advertisements exceeding five lines and not ex _ seeding ten lilies, are charged $1 for first insertion and 50 cents for each insertion thereafter. All Obituary and Marriage notices exceeding five ties, and all communications, resolutions and other notices of limited or individual interest, are charged WS cents per line. • Advertisements or subscriptions may be sent di- Teeny to the Publishers, or through any responsible Oita? Agency. M'OLORE & STONER, Proprietors. ...MEM X. SITRYOCK is authorized to receive SdbsuriPtions and contract for Advertisements for TllO REPOSITORY in the ,Eastern cities._ .SINGLE copies of the REPOSITORY can be had at the counter, with or without wrappers. Price five cents. Persons or, dering single copies to be mailed must enclose a two cent postage stamp. TE Union. Committee of Franklin county will meet' at the office of John Stewart,,F,sh., the Chairman, onSaturday next, VI elect delegates to the State Con vention. A full attendance is requested. Ix is not disguised by friend or foe, that the decisive struggle with Treason lap be made in Virginia, and the terri ble conflict may belong to'history before another moon shall wax anil wane. Pa triot and Traitor leaders of choicest skill, and most renowned in the annals.of vie tory, lead the opposing columns; and ex hausting efforts axe Made on either -side ,Weoncentrate for the bloody :arbitrament so'fraught with weal or woe to our COM • men country. We do not look for easy triumph or the speedy capture of the cap ital of crime. With the desperation of death itself, treason has summoned its last i resources, and it will recede only af ter its almost superhuman resistance has bect(overeome. It will crowd its soil with new hecatombs of dead, and send batik the dark shadow of bereavement to thouisands of loyal homes; but, with un faltering faith in the triumph of a just and )Iy,ca,use, r 4we look for the preservation of the .Republic by the success -of the ! Union arms in the, coming strugile. ; ; SANCTITY OF 'THE LAWS. if ,]We would preserve our liberties we must: maintain the sanctity and suprema cy of :the laws. They must be supreme imderall circumstances, regardless of class or condition; color; prejudice • or persuasion ; and to this great endeVery citizei should direct his determined efforts. Eipecially in troublous days like„ these, is the good citizen required at times to set his face like flint against the lawless . ness;of which civil feuds and revolution are ever the fruitful parent. If in pre trsrving our government by force of arms against treason, we ,should inaugurate disorder and anarchy in the,administra tion of the civil law, our reseued Nation ality 4would turn to an empty bauble in our hands. In short, a government with out hiw is a libel and 'a fraud, and is net worth preserving. Thii journal has repeatedly spoken bold- , ly in behalf of the sanctity of the laws. It his condemned contempt for law whether open or covert ; whether display ed by the cowardly foes of the government; or `by these who assume summarily to vindicate realorimaginary wrongs against the C,ountry's cause. and plead their devo tion to it in, justification of lawlessness. Whether soldier or civilian , p olitical frien d or foe, we hold that the same obligations ID society obtain; the same respect for per son, property and life must be practice.d, and the same penalties inflicted forcrime. To a4nmethat a newspaper-is not loyal sad ;therefore destroy it byt'Violencr, is none the less lawlesiif the assumption be -trim (for the remedy is buten aggravated form of the wrong sought to be redressed; and tojusti6 violence , or crime, or even to extenuate the same in opinion or in the rulmiMStration of justice, because of po liticaldilference, of opinion touching the support of the government, is but to steal the mine and livery of the law to fling anarcly broadcast over the land. Let; us look at home. Three important criminal trials were disposed of in our -courts here last week. In one case a sol dier had murdered a negro, and laVeyers of all rihades of politicalbelief were invek - - ed to prosecute - and defend. Did it es cape the obsers , .ation of the dallest at terulant upon the trial; that men of the Democratic faith .only were deemed by the defenc.e acceptable furors? And why? Was it believed that 'iliePublicans would convict the prisoner whether guilty or not,, Pimply because the -victim was a segreT3 We think not,; indeed none will tomune that they would have done more thait hold the prisoner guilty orklmoeent, war* regard to the color .or e :meter hig l lietirn, na the testimony might de ' ta aad," Why, then, were jurors of a fereakpolitia9l persuasion preferred? We opnaed,a that it was not because they are wantiMe;in'irite.grity or in a just appzeci- Atka de kthe :solituniq - of an oath; but they were inanifestlychoseubecause they were presumed to-be schooled to hatethe negro, and upon their prejudices, Opera tins insensibly upon their re...'usen,' did the defence rely for safety. Two advocates, justly eminent for legal learning and for eloquence and skill in appeals to jnr id, plead for the life of the prisoner. Judge Kimmel' lectured the jury on mis- cegenation, and 'a 'stranger would have supposed that the S . riglo-saxon race was trembling in the 'balance for existence, rather than the life of a culprit; and Mr. Sharpe rehashed to the jury the common 'spawn of petty treason, by his declaration that the war had been prostituted from its original and holy purpose to a war for the elevation of the negro. And why were these startling declarations . interwoven with appeals in behalf of a prisoner, in a case with which the purposes of the war and the mingling of races had no more to do than they have with the revolutions of the comets? 'Messrs. Sharpe and Kim mell do not thus strangely talk from force of habit. Both have made political speeches but never so-madly wrong—nor could they to-day be induced to harrangue a public meeting as they dia. a jury in an issue of life and death. They spoke as adVocates, and we are not prepared to say that they spoke mnwisely as such. They had sought as ju'rors men whose hatred for the negro is part of their political faith, and they aimed to brutalize the jury by appealing to their prejudices, hoping to'give them the mastery over reason and conseienee in the verdict to 'be mule up. They did not say in so many words that the killing of a negro was little Or no crime; that he was becoming quite too important in this country ; that he would soon be upon equality with. the whites ; and therefore it was time that the white man's hand should be against him even unto death—for that would have made an honest jury revolt; but they sought to carry the conviction. imperceptibly :to their minds through their prejudices,tru st ing to inflamed prejudices' to magnify doubts, and magnified doubts to procure an acquittal. Equally forcible was the illustration of the correctness of our premises in two other cases. A 'soldier had killed a citi zen—they were of different political faith, and the deed had been committed on elec tion evening and in a political fracas. The same rule that dictated Democratic jurors in the case, before alluded to, de -1 manded: Republican jurors in this one, . and political feeling ran high throughout the trial, especially amongst thosewho live in the locality where the alleged of fence was committed. The case was tea- ken from the jury by the judge on the ground that the testimony of the Com monwerdth could not be complete, beCause of the, failure to make a post mortem- ex ' amination of the body ; but had it gone to the jury, ,we should have had an as sortment of stars and stripes and fourth of July orations in behalf of the prisoner, in strange contrast with the political speeches Of the counsel. Were Republi can jurors chosen in this case . , because they, were wanting in honesty or respect for the laws, or in their appreciation of the solemnity of their oath? , Not at all.