CITY—REPUBLICAN
GOVERNOR LIEUT. GOVERNOR
T3 -
* °
O C
t £ rt
C. £
53 K c S n
®aoa ° S g
a g £ S. £ I &
DISTRICTS I 5 (S S kj
*• 5? is &< " o
~ a . £ • a; * "S 65
!r S os m ■£ a .
~ O £ jf M ,c
© , *. xos£TJ.o
tf h, IS CO,® H H £
First Ward — ■.
Ist precinct 13 32 39 15
2nd precinct 5 6 94 2 3 4 108 8 15
3rd precinct ....... 4 37 110 2 3 1 110 7 30
Second Ward—
Ist precinct 1 * 59 . ' 57 5
2nd precinct 1 9 25 1 26 8
3rd precinct ....... 2 39 50 1 3 2 58 4 26
4th precinct 36 53 3 3 56 2 25
sth precinct 1 70 116 2 4 2 138 7 34
6th precinct 3 46 99 3 1 7 110 7 22
Third Ward — I
Ist precinct 3 15 50 1 1 55 12 j
2nd precinct 17 48 1 51 11 ;
3rd precinct ....... 7 42 42 7
Fourth Ward
Ist precinct 1 42 123 1 3 3 117 5 35
2nd precinct 58 38 1 2 153 7 36
Fifth Ward —
Ist precinct ...... 37 76 2 1 2 82 1 28
2nd precinct ....... 1 31 78 2 3 82 5 18
3rd precinct 38 76 1 3 14 92 2 14
4th precinct ........ 2 35 109 13 2 2 104 4 43
Sixth Ward —
Ist precinct 5 21 136 3 145 3 16
2nd precinct ........ 2 34 106 1 1 3 il9 * 2 14
3rd precinct ...... 23 34 2 3 42 2 13
Seventh Ward—
-Ist precinct .....v.- 1 17 61 1 2 61 1 14
2nd precinct ...*••' 1327 187 12
3rd precinct ...... 19 64 2 2 65 <! 15
4th precinct ....... 3 27 134 3 4 4 132 5 18
sth precinct ...... 4 28 66 2 6 5 71 3 ' 12
6th precinct ...... 2 19 91 1 1 97 5 8
Eight Ward—
3rd precinct 3 76 127 1 4 5 141 9 46
4th precinct ...... 3 12 97 1 1 92 3 16
sth precinct ....... 2 62 82 3 8 5 95 3 37
Ninth Ward—
-Ist precinct ....... 2 8 90 1 96 1 4
2nd precinct ...... 3 53 89 ' 2 2 3 117 5 17
3rd precinct 3 28 "2 3 1 5 85 1 15
4th precinct ...... 3 35 57 5 4 72 1 10
sth precinct 3 63 78 5 8 3 98 10 26
6th precinct ....... 2 64 69 5 4 2 88 3 42
, 7th preciw?t 61 K 3 3 6 83 5 29
•Bth precinct 1 53 42 1 2 58 4 33
9th precinct ...... 2 54 74 4 1 5 gg 9 2 4
Tenth Ward —
Ist precinct , 1 79 122 1 3 '8 136 7 47
2nd precinct .' 2 56 95 6 5 10 104 6 31
3rd precinct 4 59 38 7 6 4 70 5 21
4th precinct 76 90 9 7 10 112 n 35
Eleventh Ward —
Ist precvuet 5 24 83 1 1 3 34 17
2nd precinct 35 39 2 3 47 3 17
3rd precinct 37 I®3 2 2 3 114 5 17
4th precinct 2 42 75 2 4 3 84 3 01
Twelfth Ward—
-Ist precinct 2 24 "2 1 3 1 76 5 13
2nd precinct 7 46 14 2 3 7 2 154 9 23
3rd precinct 3 37 91 4 4 4 99 6 21
Thirtenth Ward—
-Ist precinct 2 24 66 3 2 4 69 3 16
2nd precinct 4 42 fi l 7 4 4 <59 7 25
Fourteenth Ward .... 22 *1 50 ~g
Totals 100 1913 4"57 117 136 159 4780 211 1182
COUNTY- REPUBLICAN
Berrysburg Borough .. 11 23 23 3~~
Conewago Township .. 6 31 1 3 ' 28 5
Dauphin Borough .... 10 40 41;
Derry Township—
-Ist precinct 2 5 21 2 20 3
2nd precinct ' 10 33 , 4j
3rd precinct 23 is 95
East Hanover Twp. .. 379 gg
Elizabethville Borough, 4 31 94 6 2 4 101 5 16
Gratz Borough 4 12 31 5 21 1 39 10
Halifax Borough ....
Halifax Township ... 19 52 57 9
Highspire Borough .. 4 24 57 5 3 4 51 10 15
Borough— .
Ist precinct 30 g4 7 g lgl
2nd precinct 26 3 7 g 15
Jackson Township ... 5 38 3g 4
Jefferson Township .. 1 25 17 3
Londonderry Township, 7 04 23 •>
Lower Paxton Twp .. 21 77 g Q
Lower Swatara Twp ..
Lykens Borough—
East Ward •••••• 10 4 47 2 1 7 50 4
West Ward 1 33 g 9 4 g 69 ' 4 ir,
Lykens Township .... 6 10 46 2 3 4 48 5 6
Middletown —
Ist Wd—lst Pot .. 2 2 i-> n 'lls •>
Ist Wd-2nd Pet. .. 4 2 57 2 j 1 54 o ;
2nd Wd—lst Pet .. 1 14 53 2 o go " o
2nd Wd—2nd Pet .. 2 14 <;<; j " . -
3rd Wd—lst Pet .. 3 12 so i 1 •> 50 5 7
3rd Wd—2nd Pet. 1 12 28 ■> •> 07 ? L
Middle Paxton Twp—
-Ist precinct 7 2 7 32
2nd prec'nct 1 1 16 2 17 2
Mifflin Township .... • 2 11 19 2 3 1 n 6 i
Millersburg Borough—
-Ist ward 20 101
2nd ward 31 73 Tq
Paxtang Borough ... 1 28 34 4 *>l 34 4 ->i
Penbrook Borough... 45 91 13 "7 qq o 01
Reed Township 1 1 17 19
Royal ton Borough—
-Ist ward 1 3 3 5 0
2nd ward 3 1 26 2 31 •>
Rush' Township 1 2 3 1 7 1
RouthHanover Twp. 2 5 63 3 j 68 3 1
Steelton—
-Ist Wd—lst Pet 2 8 17 16 f s
Ist Wd—2nd Pet .. 1 3 i4g 2 1 "150 1
2nd Wd—lst Pet .. 3 19 31 1 * 1 39 i 7
2nd Wd —2nd Pet .. 3 2037 4 3 5 o 7 R ~
3rd Wd—lst Pet .. 5 46 72 3 ? 77 1 U
3rd Wd—2nd Pet .. 8 42 79 8 6 5 113 s ,7
3rd Wd—3rd Pet .. 7 g s 17
4th Ward ~. 3 18 65 6 3 j fig
■ sth Wd—lst Pet .. 4 5 27 1 ?
nth Wd—2nd Pet .. 4 15 42 1 4 1 J
Susquehanna— .
North precinct .... 4 35 '
South prec'nct 49 63 q
East precinct 29 84 7 ,~
West precinct 16 7 ,
Swatara—
-Ist precipct 7 29 te
2nd precinct 15 69 ~
3rd precinct 23 52 K0 *
4th precinct X 13 ,3
sth precinct 13 25 36
Uniontown Borough 2 6 27 31 ,
Upper Paxton Twp .. 16 .64 us il
Washington Township, 16 59 ye "
Wayne Township .... 8 c g
West Hanover Twp .. 8 27 31
West Londonderry Twp 2 10 !•> 7
Wleon'sco Township— " 1
Ist precinct 5 32 35 1 1 4 49 4
2nd precinct 4 5 63 * 7 1 75 \ ?
Wllliamstown Borough—
Kast ward 44 102 130
West ward 36 1:3 :®
Williams Township— .
East precinct 3 I' 7 ,1
West precinct 13 53 6 5 g
Totals 103 1042 3218 ~T 9 Tf
(Iran,l totals 203 2955 7270 200 ~2IS ~256 g~m "m Tm
WANDYKE WILL NOT \
CONCEDE ELECTION
[Continued From First I'ngc.]
of the state remained at the head
quarters all night and some refused
to cat breakfast to-day as a sign of
humiliation. They reassembled' at
the Market Square windmill and
burned many dollars in long-dis'ahce
telephone calls to local lenders, who
■were as badly rattled as they were
themselves.
To add to the discomfort caused
by the run of the Judge in Phila
delphia. Northampton, Berks, North
umberland. Kile and other counties
TVEDNKSDAY EVENING, * HARRISBURG TELEGRAPH * MAY 22, 1918
I which had been on the Guffey "sure
thins" list, came the sad news that
| Congressman Arthur G. Dewalt. who
I I.ad beef! guillotined as state chair-
I man oy the Palmer-JfcCormick ma
chine to clear the path to poWer in
1911, had beaten William M. Croll,
the choice of Palmer and his pals for
Congress in the Berks- Lehigh dis
trict. smashing the third-term prece
dent for Lehigh county and routing
nil th machine's men by a ma.loi-
Ity lfAiging from 2,000 to 3,000. De
walt carried his home city of Allen
town and Dehigh county and also
Heading, the home of Croll, who was
picked out to M the instrument of
chastisement for Dewalt.
Warren VanDyke, secretary of the
REPRESENTATIVE. I
GOVERNOR GENERAL ASSEMBLY V
"3 ~ x s
* > f c ■i
.2 2t 5 a
a b 9 03 E 5
DISTRICTS § H t S
1: i 3 2 1 5
o . • w w w 5 "5
pt, 3 .22 O c
c -s s S - b •
& | E S a o
to , b
h 5 % < a r -- = ±
c '
FIRST WARD—
-Ist Precinct 16 5.. 11 5 8 17 3 1
2nd Precinct 17 12 . . 13 15 4 15 5:
3rd Precinct 38 20 . . 17 ,17 30 40 1 j
! SECOND WARD— „ I
Ist Precinct 3 3.. 3 3 4 2 0,
2nd Precinct 11 9 1 8 5 15 12 5
3rd Precinct 4 30 .. 28 20 7 9 11
4th Precinct 7 33 2 35 29 3 13 II
sth Precinct 8 31 2 34 33 3 6 Zj
I 6th Precinct 10 48 1 51 48 7 10 2
i THIRD WARD— „
; Ist Precinct ' 8 9.. 11 5 10 7 0!
2nd Precinct 11 9 .. 8 6 10 12 1
3rd Precinct 4 16 . . 17 15 2 5 0
FOURTH WARD — I
>lst Precinct 8 40 1 40 33 13 8 2,
2nd Precinct 18 62 . . 68 61 14 16 1
FIFTH WARD—
-Ist Precinct *. 13 12 1 13 12 13 12 1
2nd Precinct 12 27 .. 33 '2B 6 9 2
3rd Precinct 15 41 .. 46 38 8 15 5
4th Precinct 16 20 1 32 25 4 9 2
SIXTH WARD—
-Ist Precinct 40 21 . . 33 28 15 26 i
2nd Precinct 17 33 . . 35 28 17 17 7
3rd Precinct 12 14 2 16 21 4 6 4
SEVENTH WARD—
-Ist Precinct 7 5 1 4 4 6 7 0
2nd Precinct 8 6 .. 11 10 .. 2 2
3rd Precinct 6 11 1 11 * 12 4 5 4
4th Precinct 14 31 1 25 36 7 7 11
sth Precinct 12 29 1 36 33 2 3 6
6th Precinct 17 16 3 26 20 8 13 4
EIGHTH WARD —
Ist Precinct '. !
2nd Precinct
3rd Precinct 10 28 .. 25 23 7 14
4th Precinct .'. 4 16 . . 15 13 3 7 1
sth Precinct 4 30 .. . 31 27 3 4 -
NINTH WARD—
-Ist Precinct 7 5.. 5 4 4 8 1_
2nd Precinct 10 25 1 28 23 10 11 1
3rd Precinct 10 24 . . 25 . 23 3 6 3
4th Precinct .* 3 25 . . 25 23 .. 5 1
sth Precinct 10 37 2 43 44 1 8 1 1
6th Precinct 7 37 4 31 30 2 10 7 j
7th Precinct 10 37 1 40 38 5 7 5
Bth Precinct 4 24 .; 26 22 3 5 3i_
9th Precinct 2 37 .. 38 35 .. 1 2
TENTH WARD— |
Ist Precinct 9 44 . . 47 41 5 4 5
2nd Precinct 35 72 9 88 80 14 11 24 :
3rd Precinct 11 45 4 52 45 2 5 14!
4th Precinct 17 43 .. 53 48 2 9 9
ELEVENTH WARD—
-Ist Precinct 11 26 2 34 31 4 3 3 ,
2nd Precinct 5 73 . . 72 71 3 7 5
3rd Precinct 24 26 2 43 34 7 12 5
4th Precinct 11 25 . . 29 32 2 5 3
TWELFTH WARD—
-Ist Precinct i. •• 4 21 .. 23 23 2 1 0
2nd Precinct /. • • 18 36 . . 42 31 13 18 8;
3rd Precinct 27 58 1 64 61 11 21 8 1
THIRTEENTH WARD —
Ist Precinct IB 23 1 25 23 1 4
2nd Precinct 18 36 . . 45 41 5 11 1
FOURTEENTH
WARD 7 22 .. 28 25 . . 4 2
Totals 645 1462 45 1641 1481 336 488 197.
COUNTY DEMOCRATIC
GOVERNOR i
4)
* , S
--S ® G
5 t £
ffl ? *
DISTRICTS 0 •§
u b -
g £
t O. c I
* g |
H l-S ■?
Berrysburg Boro 8 •••
Conewago Twp 1 ••• •••
Dauphin Boro 3 14 •••
Derry Township—
-2d Precinct 1 . •••
3d Precinct 6 If •••
East Hanover Twp. .. 0 J •••
Elizabethvilie Boro ... 7 51 1
Grata Boro 1 J *
Haiifox Boro 10 J-J *>•
Halifax Twp 3 31 ...
Highspire Boro •••
Humnieistown Borough—
-Ist Precinct 4 } •*•
2d Precinct 7 17 ...
Jackson Twp 5 48 n .
Jefferson Twp j ® •••
Londonderry Twp. ... 1 •• •
Lykens Borough—
Kast Ward ® J1
West Ward 6 -5 •••
Lykens Twp 2 7 1
Middletown — _ ,
Ist Wd„ Ist Prect... 7 4 1
Ist Wd.. 2d Prect... 6 13 1
2d Wd.. Ist Prect... 2 23 ...
2d Wd.. 2d Prect... 4 b ...
3d Wd., Ist Prect... 6 7 ...
3d \Vd„ 2d Prect... 4 13
Middle Paxton Twp.— •
Ist Precinct 15 1 •••
2d Precinct 2 7 ...
Mifflin Twp 1 8 ...
Millersburg Borough—
-Ist Ward 4 18 ...
2d Ward 2 30 ...
Paxtang Boro 1 20 ...
Penbrook Boro - 11
Koyatton Borough—•
Ist Ward 1 .5 •••
2d Ward 4 11 ...
Rush Twp. 2 .... ...
South Hanover Twp... 2 10 ...
Steelton —
Ist Wd., Ist Prect.. 2 8 ...
Ist Wd., 2d Prect... 4 7 ...
2d Wd., Ist Prect... 5 12 ...
2d Wd., 2d Prect...j 4 10 ...
:;d Wd.. Ist Prect... 4 12 ...
:!d Wd., 2d Prect... 1 9 ...
;id Wd., 3d Prect... 2 ... ...
4th Ward '... }1 24 1
r.th Wd.. Ist Prect... 12 5 1
sth Wd., 2d Prect... 4 6 ...
Susquehanna— l
Noith Precinct ..... 2 13 ...
Kast Precinct 7 ...
West Precinct,... 1 3 ...
Swatara —
Ist Precinct 4 11 ...
2d Precinct ® ...
lid Precinct 4 11 ...
Jt.h Precinct • J
r.th Precinct 1 7 ...
Lniontown Boro 1 -1 ...
tipper Paxton Twp. .. h 39 ...
Washington Twp 6 13 ...
\V;tyne Twp 3 Is ...
West Hanover Twp 3 ...
\V Londonderry Twp.. 1
Wiconisco Twp.—' ,
Ist Precinct 4 .5 ...
2d Precinct 11 7 ...
Williamstown Boro.— '
Kast Ward i... • 20 ...
West Ward 5 6
Williams Township—
Kast Precinct ...... 3 3 ...
West Precinct 1 3
Totals 249 "74_3; '0
Grand totals 894
Democratic State. Committee, Cellar
ed at noon that "indications favorei!
tJic nomination of Joseph F. Guffey
as the Democratic candidate for Gov
ernor by about 5,000 majority." Mr.
VanDyke was in telennonic com
munication with a number of coun
ties during the morning and said
about 1 o'clock: "I think that Mr.
Guffey has been nominated. 'I base
that upon figures coming to head
quarters. The sine of the majority
will depend upon how well the vote
was go'.ten out in the western coun
ties, where there was virtually no
contest. I think that Mr. GufTey will
win by about 5,000."
Howard O. Holstefn, candidate for
Lieutenant-Governor on the Bonni
well ticket, declined to make any
statement.
No staterrfent was forthcoming
from the O'Neil headquarters and all
inquirers for an expression or a
statement as to third ticket rumors
DAUPHIN COUNTY VOTE j
BIG FOR BEIDLEMAN
[Continued from First Page.]
McCoy 1238
Ulsh 2383
Representative in Legislature—
City—Complete—
Black 1641 !
Hartman 1481
McConkcy 336 J
Oppernian 488
Smith 10"
No contest on Democratic side for
liegislature in county district.
JUDGE
City—so of 53 Districts
Huselton 2162
Porter 4532 i
County—23 of 71 Districts
Huselton 607 <'
Porter 1055 |
Totals
I Huselton 2769
| Porter . 5587
REPRESENTATIVE IN CON
GRESS-AT-LARGE
(52 of 53 City and 54 of 71 County
Districts a Total of 106
and 124 Districts)
City. County. Ttl.
Aaron 1021 055 2876 1
Atherton 1248 568 1810
Durke 1714 747 2461 1
Clement 1577 807 2384
Crago 3400 2068 5558
Flyte 428 206 724
Garland 3408 2033 5441
Harner 628 303 1021 ,
McGarrlty 551 381 012
McLaughlin 2564 1601 4165
Mitchell 1111 466 157 7
Rich : 646 390 1036
Robins 675 458 1133 .
Waltcis 3018 1091 5012
Bciillcman Displays Strength
Yesterday's returns are indicative
[ of Senator Beidleman's personal
strength in his hoihe community
as he had not only to contend against
men aligned by the state administra
tion, but rivals for control of the
local Republican organization. Lined
up against him in a prominent way
were George Mcllhenny, former
deputy sheriff, and Mayor Daniel L
Keister. Mcllhenny was defeated
for county committee in his home
district for the first time in his
political career.
Senator Sproul, like Mr. Beidle
man was confionted in Dauphin
county with the full force of the
state administration and his easy
victory over Mr.O'Neil in this county
is taken not only as a sign of his
support by the Beidleman organiza
tion, but of his own personal popu
larity because of the fact that iri a
number of districts he led even the
9 local candidate by substantial fig
-5 ures.
As compared with the size of the
Republican vote the Democrats of
- Dauphin county made a pitiful show
-1 ing considering all the noise that
• has been made. Guffey carried the
■ county by less than 1,500, his total
vote running very little over 2500,
- while Bonlwell polled about l.ftOO
■ votes. The total Democratic strength
I in the primary yesterday after all
• districts are in It is believed will
6 run considerably tinder 4,000.
Senator Beidleman heard the re
' turns at the Republican state head
s quarters in Philadelphia. He re
mained in Philadelphia to-day, but
' telegrams received by friends here
1 were to the effect that Philadelphia
figured his nomination by from
r 20,000 \o 30,000.
t :
were referred to Mr. O'Nell, who Is in
* Pittsburgh.
1 Governor Brumbaugh and other
* state officials active in the O'Neil
8 campaign were not here to-day.
A " A
Nominated For Lieutenant Governor ] -
< iJ J
' : r
' '• ; ! I, ' V " :
M Sk
fl| 1
9BHL f,J
™ to ...
IKmHH
W Bk, |-
H Hk |B In
SENATOR EDWARD E. BEIDLEMAN
Dauphin County Man Whose Candidacy for the Second Highest Position in
• the State Government Was Given Cordial Endorsement at the
Polls Yesterday. Senator Beidleman Was Given a
Particularly Heavy Vote /by Workingmen.
Senator Sproul Grateful
For Support
CH£STEK, May 22—Senator Sproul gave out Hie following state,
ment:
"■rTMIK large vote by which I have been nominated tor Governor
of Pennsylvania by the Republicans of the state, is naturally j
•' most gratifying to me. No one could he Insensible to the
compliment thus expressed. I am particularly proud of the fact
that in my O'.TII home county, anil in the neiglilHiring counties where
I am known l>est, my vote has been so remarkably large. The big
majority which has been given to ine in the city of Philadelphia lias
justified my claim that I would not be a /actional candidate. I have,
apparently, had the support of the great bulk of the Republicans
there, and if my candidacy now, and my administration after I
shall have been) elected, will help to put an end to the factional
misunderstandings in Philadelphia and make for better conditions
there and in the state, I shall, Indeed, be grateful.
"I am thankful that my campaign has been carried to a success
ful conclusion without resort u|Ktn my part, or In my behalf by any
one. to the best of my knowledge, of any personal attacks, public
denunciation or last card slander ui>on any connected with the op
position.
"The decisive character of the Republican primaries Alls me with
a sense of deep responsibility, a consciousness that a great confi
dence has been placed In me by the voters of my party. With a
thorough appreciation of my duty as a candidate and of the work
that Is ahead of me. I give myself over to that duty and that work,
and promise a most complete efTort to deserve the rath in me "which
my friends ami the people In general have sbown. I have no
grudges to pay, no enemies to punish, no debts to discharge—only
a desire to lead a united party to victory in November, that we
may render devoted service to the Nation and to our people here
in Pensylvania.
"I am ready now for the work of the campaign."
DR. CLAY POOL IS
NOT SURPRISED BY
SPROUL'SVICTORY
Says if ' Bonniwell Wins,
"Drys" Will Be For Repub
lican Nominee Solidly
Dr. Ernest V. Claypool, superin
tendent of the Anti-Saloon League,
made this statement to-day:
"Because of the statements from
various parts of the state which had
come to me unofficially, I am not
surprised at the nomination of Sen
ator Sproul for Governor. Though a
'supporter of J. Denny O'Neil, I have
and still do take Senator Sprdul's
statements regarding; his support of
prohibition at their face value. This
,s no new statement, but the repeat
ing of my decorations to scores of
men during the campaign. If It
p-oves with the final returns tha*.
Bonniwell is nominated on the Dem
ocrat ticket, tiiere will be nothing
fo* the temperance people of the
state to do bu. iine up solidly with
Sp oul. Of course the action will not
be taken 'ormally until the opening
of the campaign in the faV.
'As jegards the Legislative situa
tion 'n. -be entire state, I am satis
tied tha>- the final returns from the
November e'e"!tion will show a defi
nite majority in the lower house for
ratification 'of national prohibition
and believe the same condition likely
lo obtain in the .Senate. In Dauph'.n
oountv the formal action as regards
Legislative candidates will In due
time oe taken toy the ratification
committee. Of course, it will put it
self behind the dry candidates both
in the city and In the Second district.
We are stil proud.of the character
o' the men that we supported and
can unreservedly give our approval
to the dry men nominated on the
Democratic ticket both in the city
and in the county.
"The result in Pennsylvania will
have little effect on the adoption of
national prohibition. The question
has Been and Is the honor of Penn
sylvania in cunnection with this
question and not as to whether the
national prohibition amendment will
be- adopted. Not fewer than forty
states wil] ratify It within the next
twelve months.
"The Anti-Saloon League will
maintain Us nonpartisan character
absolutely, it will begin Its plan
ning for the fall campaign within a
few d&ys and will be prepared the
first of September to suppc/t dry
candidates with an effectiveness
greater than it has ever had before.
We are satisfied that a Legislature
can be elected next November which
will prohlbltiT „
k 7
WET DEMOCRAT
FOR GOVERNOR
[Continued from First Pae.]
adelphia remaining' in the Democra
tic column, will probably next fall
elect a Republican, Walter J. Little
ton, to select council. This will leave
the Democrats without representa
tion in council.
Senator Sproul Wins
Own District by 156
to 6; Children Greet
Cheater, May 22. Senator Sproul
carried his own district in Delaware
county by a vote of 156 to 6. The
nominee for Governor on the Re
publican ticket cast his vote a few
hours after the polls opened yester
day morning in Nether Providence
township, Delaware County on the
outskirts of Chester. The polling
place was but a short distance from
his home, Lapilea Manor, and was
located in an abandoned schoolhouse.
The election officers met Senator
! Sproul with a smile and presented him
with the thirty-first ballot handed out
' and the t.wenty-sixth Republican. He
chatted with the election officials
for a few minutes and on his way
out of the schoolhouse was met by
i a number of children from an Episco
pal orphanage nearby. They pre
, sjnted the Senator with some flow
ers and in return each received a
handshake and one of Mr. Sproul's
famous smiles.
; Beidleman Defeats
Scott in Franklin
CliambcTSburg, Pa., May 22.
. With returns from sixty-two of the
sixty-seven districts in, Senator
. Sproul is leading O'Neil with 1472
voteß to 1185 in the Republican con
. tost for the gubernatorial nomina
, tion in Franklin county. Beidleman
had 1376 votes' to 857 for Scott.
, Democratic leaders are slow in conv
, pleting their returns, and the only
, thing known concerning the results
| in their party is that Guffey is lead
. Ing by a substantial majority.
, Two "dry" men gaitred the Repub
lican nominations for the House of
I Representatives. They were F. 8.
I Magill, of Che.mbersburg, with 1618
I votes, and L. F. Benchoff, Wayfies
. boro. with 1553 votes. A. M. Stager,
. of Chambersburg. the one successful
candidate, had 1501 votes. Focht
I with 1476 votes -is leading in the
. contest for the Republican Congres
, sional nomination in the Seven
teenth district. Wflliamson had
\ 1176 votes.
i All "Dry" Candidates
Win in Cumberland
1 Carllale, Pa„ May 22.—With 57 of
r the 60 districts In Cumberland county
• reporting. Sproul had 1.858 votes and
, O'Neil 675 In the Republican guber
, natorlal contest. Beidleman had 1877
' votes against. Scott's 325 in the Lleu
' tenant Governor nomination fight.
' Guffey and I-ogue were nominated on
. the Democratic tickets with 1100 votes
, against approximately 400 for their
opponents.
Houck Is leading in the Republican
ftnlnaXloa contae* tiecr&xrf <3|
J.
CITY—REPUBLICAN
REP. GENERAL ASSEMBLY
u
> fc -
t .o> £ o c
•- > u * h = *3 §
DISTRICTS • "5 - 1
te * 5 "£ ' f ' O H £
5:! 5 I E t "
.2 " "o '*• .2 - - f
* "ts3<oa J p 5 5 "
First Ward—
First Precipct 4 9 25 25 11 ' 1 1 7 1 5
Second Precinct 21*' 17 80 75 26 1 .3 18 16 4
Third Precinct 13 13 91 85 32 6 3 31 7 3
Second Ward—
First Precinct .. 4 2 62 53 2 3 0 5 1 0
Second Precinct 6 2 18 18 10 1 0 10 1 0
Third Precinct S 24 3X 37 31 1 3 35 4 1
Fourth Precinct ....... 6 " 22 35 34 35 3 3 32 4 1
Fifth Precinct 10 29 96 91 68 3 4 59 8 6
Sixth Precinct ... 5 12 74 73 65 6 5 55 7 5
Third Ward—
First Precinct 6 2 42 47 12 1 0 11 3 1
Second Precinct* 7 0 31 5 18 2 1 0 7 12
Third Precinct 1 - 3 33 28 7 28 1 13 3 0
Fourth Ward—
. First Precinct 14 23 56 62 07 2 5 68 11 9
Second Precinct 14 22 81 89 73 6 2 84 12 5
Fifth Ward-
First Precinct 8 6 56 62 33 5 2 40 7 3
Second Precinct 10 7 42 52 42 4 3 47 8 4
Third Precinct 2 10 60 63 29 60 4 41 5 4
Fourth Precinct 9 11 82 105 20 10 1 38 10 9
Sixth Ward—
First Precinct 9 2 118 127 26 4 1 35 6 2
Second Precinct 11 5 74 92 30 5 1 34 6 2
Third Precinct 6 5 21 27 16 3 4 26 2 5
Seventh Ward—
First Precinct. 8 5 43 49 14 1 0 18 9 2
Second Precinct 4 5 177 177 13 1 0 17 5 3 ■
Third Precinct 4 2 45 49 >6 6 2 24 4 2
Fourth Precinct 5 5 101 134 17 10 3 48 2 2
Fifth Precinct 3 3 4 64 17 11 0 41 6 4
Sixth Precinct 5 6 65 72 27 1 3 26 6 0
Eighth Ward—
Third Precinct 15 21 94 82 100 4 4 41 6 1
1-ourth Precinct 6 4 83 77 18 0 3 21 7 0
Mfth Precinct 4 10 88 45 76 4 2 56 5 2
Ninth Ward-
First Precinct 4 5 89 96 6 1 5 6 2 2
Second Precinct 9 37 54 60 52 4 8 42 5 7
Third Precinct 27 22 22 47 19 2 7 20 5 6
T'ourth Precinct 9 20 26 28 48 3 5 31 1 8
Fifth Precinct 12 26 49 54 73 6 8 50 6 4
Sixth Precinct 9 20 41 28 82 1 6 70 8 5
Seventh, Precinct 15 19 25 22 79 6 8 67 5 6
Eighth Precinct 11 15 20 18 64 3 5 54 3 1
Ninth Precinct 9 28 34 31 67 2 18 55 11 7
Tenth Ward—
First Precinct 10 23 51 72 76 19 6 116 5 19
Second Precinct 6 10 34 63 61 21 0 92 2 16
Third Precinct 4 5 28 44 25 16 0 58 4 28
1-ourth Precinct 11 10 24 72 49 35 1 105 5 29
Eleventh Ward—
First Precinct 8 3 45 69 22 9 1 41 2 10
Second Precinct 1 2 22 29 18 5 2 47 1 10
Third PMcinct 4 13 65 74 41 8 3 60 4 6
1-ourth Precinct 9 12 24 42 60 7 3 71 12 7
Twelfth Ward—
First Precinct 11 9 54 60 19 4 0 25 3 5
S.i c .°5 d Precinct 20 23 93 111 45 20 1 61 8 6
_ Th'rd Precinct 6 5 63 80 36 12 1 47 8 9
Thirteenth Ward— • •
First Precinct 3 17 . 48 50 33 2 0 27 2 2
becond Precinct 13 16 38 38 55 6 2 52 " 4
Fourteenth Ward 3 6, 13 21 28 6 0 42 0 5
Totals 142 633 2917 3211 1989 390 154 2220 283 299
REPUBLICAN "
REPRESENTATIVE
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY
i?
i <= x
t. 2 2.®
DISTRICTS o * - a O
<3O a> M os
ca ti w a -
o K fe 2
£la a <
■g ■ tt a ?
•? 2 5 3 | H
m ~ M
Berrysburg Borough 6 6 3 9 9 6 19
Conewago Township 4 27 2 2 5 1 24
Dauphin Borough 2 19 8 15 12 14 25
Derry Township
Ist Precinct 1 20 2 1 3 1 18
2nd Precinct 11 25 10 4 13 8 19
3rd Precinct 24 52 13 37 13 42 39
East Hanover TQwnship 2 71 2 3 5 5 69
EiisabethviHe Borough 3 52 10 13 81 16 70
Gratz Borough
Halifax Borough 3 51 2 30 8 *27 *sl
Halifax Township 52 3 ... 7 7 55
Highspire Borough 6 46 10 28 5 39 30
Hummelstown Borough—
-Ist Precinct 17 24 17 29 13 24 46
2nd Precinct 12 33 13 41 11 44 35
Jackson Township 3 28 ... 9 8 5 32
Jefferson Township 3 3 ... 2
Londonderry Township ...-. 3 20 6 1 3 "'4 24
Lower Paxton Township 4 51 21 20 16 22 59
Lower Swatara Township ....
Lykens Borough—
East Ward 5 21 3 35 15 18 26
West Ward 1 33 4 55 34 22 45
Lykens Township 14 17 8 25 29 2 28
Middletown—
-Ist Ward, Ist Precinct 3 11 1 2 3 4 9
Ist Ward, 2nd Precinct 10 32 3 6 3 7 32
2nd Ward, Ist Precinct 10 39 ... 23 2 23 40
2nd Ward, 2nd Precinct 4 47 6 18 6 24 48
3rd Ward, Ist Precinct 4 36 9 14 6 20 30
3rd Ward, 2nd Precinct 2 16 2 17 2 21 16
Middle Paxton Township—
-Ist Precinct 1 23 3 2 3 1 22
2nd Precinct 2 6 5 2 5 3 10
Mifflin Township 3 13 3 18 7 11 14
Millersburg Borough—
-Ist Ward 6 64 7 37 32 21 88
2nd Ward 6 40 3 28 31 20 , 70
Paxtang Borough 2 12 7 34 5 48 13
Penbrook Borough 9 60 37 41 22 38 62
Reed Township 2 14 2 ... 2 1 15
Royalton Borough—
-Ist Ward 1 4 2 3
2nd Ward 6 11 3 7 4 1# 10
Rush Township 1 1 5 3
South Hanover Township 9 28 9 6. 13 4 36
Steelton —
Ist Ward, Ist Precinct 12 ... 15 ... 15 9
Ist Ward, 2nd Precinct 1 149 3 5 2 8 146
2nd Ward, Ist Precinct 3 34 2 20 ... 30 20
2nd Ward, 2nd Precinct 3 42 3. 21 3 38 23
3rd Ward, Ist Precinct 4 79 2 39 7 66 46
3rd Ward, 2nd Precinct 35 92 7 30 4 44 73
3rd Ward, 3rd Precinct 1 7 ... 1 1 7 6
4th Ward 6 60 5 22 4 37 46
sth Ward, Ist Precinct 6 17 1 4 2 8 3
sth Ward, 2nd Precinct 3 49 2 8 2 22 39
Susquehanna—
North Precinct 3 17 16 11 4 4 27
South Precinct 5 36 88 31 33 31 55
Easi Precinct 9 64 32 18 14 26 61
West Precinct 1 2 3 ... 3 3 8
Swatara —
Ist Precinct 6 52 3 21 4 22 43
2nd Precinct 5 60 6 18 7 27 52
3rd Precinct 1 52 3 21 4 32 43
4th Precinct '. 7 1 10 1 12 8
sth Precinct 6 20 7 13 7 17 18
Uniontown Borough 18 ... 10 5 4 28
Upper Paxton Township 2 52 9 7 29 5 74
Washington Township 4 45 4 17 28 7 54
Wayne Township 1 3 1 6 5 5 5
West Hanover Township 5 11 17 4 16 1 16
West Londonderry Township 2 9 3 1 2 3 7
Wiconisco Township— ' •
Ist. Precinct 4 17 1 51 14 34 16
2nd Precinct 4 33 1 40 17 19 37
Wililamstown Borough—
East Ward 8 39 2 117 25 62 43
West Ward 14 54 6 95 23 66 53
Williams Township
East Ward 1. ... 6 ... 19 1 11 4
West Ward 6 36 2 49 10 19 29
Totals '• 358 2156 472 1338 733 1238 2383
• F ■ '• t
Internal Affairs with approximately a l
1350 majority. CraffO, Harner, Rob- '
ins and Walters were leading: in the
Congressman -at - Large Republican
nomination contest. Aa,ron S. Kreid
er, Republican won the eighteenth
congressional district nomination
without opposition, polling the larg- i
est vote recorded in the county, 2225.
H. H. Mercer, of Mechanicsburg, won
the Democratic nomination without
contest.
All "dry" candidates were .nomin
ated on both tickets in the fights for i
the Member of Assembly nomination*.
Ross L. Beckley. of Lower Allen town
ship, with 1324 votes, and W. C. i
Bowman, of Lemoyne, with 1681 votes. .
won the Republican nominations. The
Rev. A. P. Stover, of Carlisle, and
W. W. Gimipel, of Carlisle, with 1238
and 620 votes were the dther candi- '
dates. The Democratic nominees were
P. L. Bistline, of Mechanlcsburg, and
Horace C. Barrier, of Bhippensburg.
Caleb 8. Brinton. of Carlisle, Repub
lican, and W. H. Goodyear, of CarllJe, ,
Dej<MM°a4. yrm*+ >■< •tmberAnd
-t&umi on ttut respec-
7
Brodbeck Wins Place
on Congress Ticket
, By Associated Prex.x
York, Pa., May 22. The Demo
cratic' congressional nomination In
the Twentieth district was won by A.
R. Brodbeck. Harry Washers, Demo
crat. was named for the state Senate
nomination. O. O. Ettltne won the
Democratic nomination for the As
sembly and Robert S. Spangler was
the Republican nominee.
In the first legislative district John
J May got the Democratic nomi
nation, C. E. Cook is the Republican
nominee In the second district and
Harry E. Lanlus, Democratic In the
ftrurth.
L _ ybete were no ot&ec contest*.