RATES OF ADVERTISING. rata lines or less constitute half a square. Ten lines c: more than four, constitute atiquare. I gaff sq., one day_...— $3 30 One sq.. one day.... BO 60 14 one weer. ... 120 . .. • one week... ."2 00 ~ one month._ 300 it one month.. 600 three months 6 8 00 " three montbsl o 00 six months .. OO gi six months.. 15 00 w o ne year_ ....,32 00 ge one year ..... 20 00 t Er Business notices inserted in the LOCAL comma, or before marriages and deaths, TAN MINTS 4 1111 Lltill for each insertioln. Toalterms merohanbt beoffered. and others advertising by the year, iber will 113" The number of insertions must be designated on the advertisement. lE7' Harriageo and Desths Will be insetted at the satin rates as regular advertisements. Ctt Vatriot FRIDAY MORNING, APRIL 1() . 1863 THE CAMERON BRIBERY CASE. REPORT OF TUE COMMITTEE TO INIIITRILE . INTO THN TRUTH OF CHARGES MADE BY JEFFERSON BOYER, MEMBER OF THE I.,EGISLATIFRE FROMCLEAB.FIELD COUR- Ty,OF ATTEMPTS MADE BY fi f Eria SIMON CAMERON, DIREOILy, AND THROUGH THE AGENCY OF COL. JOMN J. PATTER SON AND 'WILLIAM BROBST, TO BRIBE BoyElt, BY THE OFFER OF AIDNEy AND PROMISE :OF. d LUCRATIVE APPOINT !SENT, TO VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE SAID SIMON CAMERON TO THE SENATE OF TES UNITED STATES. Tc the Iroise of Representatives of the Common. wealth of Pennsylvania: The committee appointed under the reaolu lion of the 20th of January last, to inquire *tether unlawful means were employed to cure the -election of. United States • Senator, it authority to send for persona and papers, leave to offer the following report : Your committee met, for the first time, on 21st day of January, and appointed L. Jack , Crane, Esq., as clerk. Since that time 7 have held forty-three sessions, and have &mined thirty witnesses, and some of them great length. A considerable portion of the nimony thus obtained has no direct bearing in the main question which was before the nmittee but they have thought it best here th to submit the whole of it, that it may iak for itself. It was the constant purpose of the committee conduct the investigation in such a manner that no injustice should be done to any one ; they are - persuaded that the persons ex ited will, in all ease; award to them entire mess. The first witness examined was Dr. T. Jef mn Boyer, a member of the House of Repre datives front Clearfiild county, whose state it is substantially as follows: in the early part of the session he met Mr. Mem Brobst, of Lewisburg, at the Penney'. inia House in this city i ; and after several dings, at the request of Mr. Brobst, he ated him a private • interview in his own tm. During this interview Mr. Brobst made Jwn to Di. Boyer - his - ardent desire for the talon of General Simon Cameron to the late of the United States ; assuring him that was authorized. by Gen. Cameron to enter to preliminary arrangements with any mem r of the Legislature to secure his vote, and offer five thousand dollars to any one who Ad agree to absent himself on the day of election. Mr. Brobst informed Dr. Boyer it Gen. Cameron desired to Bee him; and -angementa were accordingly made by them go to Gen. cameron's house, but were not tried out. • ' Afterwards Mr. Brobst told Dr. Boyer that . Cameron wanted to see him at the State iital Bank; and on Dr. Boyer's oonsentnig the interview, be was conducted by Mr. ihst to a back room in said bank, where he Ind Gen. Cameron. The General then shut door, put down the blinds, and had a pri m interview with Dr. Boyer. He asked the itor what he would think of two thousand 'ars for a vote, to be paid when the work done ; and remarked that he regarded this only - as a first installment. He spoke of paymaaterships, at a salary of three thou id dollars a year, one of which he could lure for Dr. Boyer. He also requested the :tor to name some one who should arrange tters between them in the future; and at suggestion of Gen. Cameron they agreed on t Burns. Brobst again met Dr. Boyer, and made her engagement -with him to go to Gen. ieron's house, but failed to fulfill his pro e. The next day, being the Friday prior the election for a United States Senator, Mr. ibst informed Dr. Boyer that Gen. Cameron ired to see him at the State Capital Bank; as Dr.. Boyer refused to meet him there, . Cameron, at the instance of Mr. Brobst, conducted to the room of Dr. Boyer in the ineylvania House. _At this interview Gen. neron agreed to give Dr. Boyer fifteen thou id dollars for his . vote ; and informed him he was going that afternoon to Philadel ma, on the Leoanon Valley cars, that Jim -us was sick, and that John J. Patterson ild go on the same train, and would make mgements in regard to the money. la the morning of that day Dr. - Boyer had with John J. Patterson, who told him that had seen Gen. Cameron, and, that he was ire of the whole matter ; proposing at the me time to meet Dr. Boyer at the Lebanon hey depot. They accordingly met, and took cars for Reading, Gen. Cameron also being i the train. In the baggage apartment of the New York r, Mr_ Patterson agreed with Dr, Boyer that should have twenty thousand dollars if he dd vote for Gen. Cameron for United States 'ator, sutject however to the approval of the metal, and Mr. Pattereon afterward inform )r. Boyer that Gen. Cameron was agreed to price. Arrangements were then made by Mr. Pill ion and Dr. Boyer to meet with. Gen Cam va on Saturday evening, at the house of J. D. leron. Accordingly, they all met at the Anted time and place; and it was there !ed upon that Gen. Cameron would give Buyer twenty thousand dollare for hie vote. In Tuesday morning, the day of the election Senator, Mr. Patterson called at Peonsylva House, immediately after breakfast, and aripanied Dr. Boyer to his (Patterson's) 1, in Herr's hotel, where they found Gen. ieron. The G-neral told Dr. Boyer that Fuller would have an interview with him whenever he was ready to receive him, requested Dr. Boyer to say to Dr. Fuller he would vote tor him (Gen Cameron) United States Senator. Dr. Fuller was uliately introduced into the room, ono tired, as the chairman of a committee muted by the Republican caucus. whether B .yer would vote for Gen. Cameron ; and tying from Dr. Boyer an affirmative answer, .tired VW, if the statement of Dr. Boyer is a true dive of facts, there can be no doubt as to laployment of unlawful means to secure election of Gen. Simon Cameron to the tte of the United States. But the com et had other testimony before th m, in ,rd to the transactions related by Dr. el and it. becomes necessary, in the light that testimony, to examine his Matins to h'ulthess there were, within a few days previous ie Senatorial election, repeated interviews reEn Mr. Brobst and Dr Boyer cannot be "'Ed; becau,e they not only ho h testify f act, but. their testimony is corruherated that. of Captain Chritzman, Dr. .E4rly, K Boyer , and Mr. Vaughn. They agree in reg4rd to the private in erviews ) et , ween Dr. Boyer and Gen. Cam • rots, first, Altuo Capital Bank, and afterwards at - I, oyer's room in the Pennsylvania House; . -. . .. __ __- . . • . . . __IT f.--, \ !.: I_c_-:_. -- ' v- ' - .:-..*. --_—_-__ __ • . . . , . . . . i - ' t , _ _. _ ..i,, ,reri ji fli 1 - - .;,.:- • , - , __:: z - :- - . . • ~" . . . . . t - I• I . _ - - ---7-';'- ' , .; :j ..; '*- 7.- ..12 . 7 .. ' .1- 7 ' I ....:. ''''' . '• • 1 . ---- 1 - ..i1111 • • : . .. ... ~. ..., , .. . ... .. :. ~ . . . .... . ..... ....... ....... .. _____ V0L..5.-NO. 189. and in this they are sustained by the testimony of Capt. Chritzmin, Dr. Early, and Mr. Vaughn. They agree, moreover, as to the arrangements and preparations which. were made to visit Geri. Canieron at his own bootie, at the request of loir.Srobst; and as to the fact that ouch preparations were made, we have the testimony of Dr. Early. There is also a marked agreement between the testimony of Dr. Boyer and that of John S. Patterson. They both testify that they met in .Harrisburg on the Friday immediately pre ceding the Senatorial election; that they went to !Reading in the afteriumn of that day, on the Lebanon Valley cars,, and that Gen. Cameron was on the same train; that arrangements were there made between Mr: Patterson and Dr. Boyer to meet Gen. Cajun:in at the hones of his scut, J. D. Cameron, on the next evening; that they met according to appointment; and that on the following Tuesday morning, the day of the Senatorial election, Dr. Boyer, at the request of Mr. Patterson, went to Pat terson's room, in Herr's Hotel, where he found Gen. Cameron, and afterwards met Dr. Fuller. These are only a few of the numerous points of eoncidence between the testimony of Dr. Boyer and that of Messrs. Brobst and Patterson. Indeed, there is almost a perfect agreement between them, except in regard to the alleged money transaction. It must be evident to every one, that in the various interviews which Mr. Brobst and Mr. Patterson had with Dr. Boyer, their only ob ject was, to influence him ' - by some means or other, to vote for General Cameron for United States Senator. But by what means did. they attempt to accomplish this object ? Here the testimony of these three witnesses involves a direct contradiction. Dr. Boyer asserts that Mr. Brobst fold him he was authorized biGen. Cameron to offer five thousand dollars for a vote, which Mr. Brobst denies; and that Gen. Cameron and Mr. Patterson positively agreed to give him twenty thousand dollars. and finally twenty-five thousand dollars, in order to secure his vote for 'Simon Cameron, which is emphati cally denied by Mr. Patterson. We are there fore bound to conclude, either that the state ments of Dr. Boyer on the one band, or those of Mr. Brobst and Mr. Patterson On the other, in regard to 'this pecuniary consideration,, are downright and deliberate falsehoods. Men always act from motives. It is'therefore legitimate to inquire, what motive could have influenced Dr. Boyer, in this single case, while allthe other leading features of his, statement are shown to be true, to bear false testimony ? It could riot have been fear ; for surely he had no more to fear from telling the truth, than from a declaration of falsehood. It could not have : been the 'lope of gala ; for it 'is iinpos sible'for any one to see hoNi he could have ex pected any profit or benefit from the utterance of any such false „statement . Nor could he have been actuated by a malevolent or revenge ful feeling; for there is no evidence of the existence of any snob feeling, on the part of Dr. Boyer, against General Cameron or any of his friends. Moreover, to suppose that any man could falsely and knowingly charge upon his fellow man,. without some strong motive, a crime which would forever blast the reputation of its perpetrator in community, and then call upon God in the most solemn manner in attes tation of tbe truthfulness of his charge, would be to ascribe to him an extraordinary degree of moral depravity. Here another Question will naturally arise ; : can any motive be discovered, on the part of Messrs. Brobst and Patterson, whloh might incline either of them to a denial of the truth, in regard to this money transaction ? . The an swer is easy. If this feature of the statement of Dr. Boyer is true, they have both been guilty of attempting to bribe a member "of this Legislature, which is, .under our laws, a high misdemeanor, subjecting the offender to a severe penalty. But who does not know, that the fear of exposure and punishment, and of the odium that must necessarily result from the commission of such a crimp, would be one of the strongest motives to iiiMPel men to false hood? It is not reasonable to expect men to criminate themselves. Let us now look at this testimony from another standpoint. Truth is always consist ent with itself. The statement of Dr. Beyer is a plain, straightforward, circumstantial, and natural story of such events as might occur, and bears upon the face of it no apparent dis crepancy. It is ooroborated, id nearly till its leading delails, by the testimony of Messrs. Ertabat and Patterson, and in several particu lars by that of Capt. Chritsman, Dr. Early, Er. Vaughn, Michael S. Boyer, and Dr. Fuller ; all which may.be seen by a reference. to' the testimony of, these .gentleinen, .herewith sub mitted. Bin now let no take a brief survey of the statements of Messrs. Brobst and Patter son ! Mr. Brobet met General Cameron some weeks before the meeting of the Legislafure, - but no conversation passed between them in regard to the election of a United States Senator. Sub sequently, without any request from any one, and of big own acord, be game to ligrrisbnrg, went the same evening to see General Cameron, and offer him his services,:without beirig asked to do so, to secure his election to the Senate of the United States. He again returned to Har risburg. stopped at Herr's Hotel, but soon re turned to th.- Pennsylvania House, where Dr. Boyer had . his room. He there met;with• Dr. Boyer, had repeated interviews with him, invi ted Boyer to go with him to General Cameron's house, provided, horses and carriage, on , two occasions, .to convey him there, visited . the General three or four times at his residence, became•tbe medium of communication between him. and Dr. -Boyer, and made arrangements for several meetings between -them. All this was done by, Mr. Brobst, be it remembered, at considerable cost both of time and money, and without any arrangement whatever with Gen. Cameron or any body else ; by which he was to be 'reimbursed. This is possible, but the ques tion will ; necessarily arise, isit at all probable ? But again—Mr. Brobst is positively implica ted, by other testimony than that of Dr. Boyer, in the alleged bribery. Mr. John Hancock tes tifies that-Mr. Brobst told him he had the au • thority of General Cameron to use money to aware his election as United • States Senator; and that any arrangement he might make, within reasonable amount, would be immedi ately complied with by General Cameron. The testimony of. Michael K . Boyer on this subject is, that Mr. Brobst told Lim he was authorized to offer ten thousand dollars for a vote. It is also in evidence that Mr. Brobst told Mr. Pot teiger, a member of the House, that if he would vote for General Cameron he could rake an independent fortune; that he would guarantee to him five thousand dollars in hand, and a position worth forty thousand dollars ; that if be would name a day, be would bring General Cameron down to Berke county and make a final bargain.. and that he had better, let party go to the devil, and make this money. The testimony of Mr. John J. Patterson, as already intimated, corroborates that of. Dr. B oe r, in nosily every point . They agree as to their trip to Reading, on the Lebanon Valley road; 'their interviews on the cars; their ar rangement to meet General Cameron at the house of hie eon, on Saturday evening previous to the Senatorial election; their meeting tic cording to this arrangement; and the interview HARRISBURG, PA:, FRIDAY, APRIL 10,,,1863. between General 'Cameron, Dr. Boyer and Senator Fuller, in Mr: Patterson'a ooM in Herr's Higel. Bit Mr. Patterson defiles, most emphatically. that either he or Gen. 'Cam'eron offered Dr. Boyer money or anythingebie, 'as a means of inducing him to vote for Cameroh..= This, .whether: true - or false in itself; : is what might be expected under the circumstances, and is, according to the statement of Dr. Boyer, what Mr. Patterson said he would testify if an investigation should be inatituttidi • There are other statements in the testimony of Mr. Patterson that are worthy of considera tion.- He said he came to Harrisburg at the request or suggestion of no one; that be ar rived There on: the eighth of Jabuity, betvieen five and six. o'clpek in, the afternoon; that.after supper he met General Cameron .by aeoident in the Poetoffiee, and was. informed- by Lim there, that he was-net :a candidate for United etates,Senator i that the next day he sought an interview with Dr. Boyer, in order to. ascertain whether he really intended to vote for Gen, Ca. nieren; . th at. after havipg some conversation With Dr. Boyer, on their way, to Beading, he had-no faith' in him, and- concluded that he would ad vise General Cameron not to trust. him ;, 'and that General Cameron said he would have no thing to do with him. Still, however, as the testimony of both Dr. Boyer anal Mr. - Patterson shows, they persisted in itolding interviews with Dr. Boyer, in order to secure his vote for General Cameron. All this service Mr. Patter son performed without fee or reward from any One. There is one other point in Mr. Patterson's testimony that may be noticed. He says he was present•during the wholetime - etthe inter view.between Senator Puller, General Cameron and Dr. Bo.yer, at his own room in Herr's hotel. Accordingly,' he relates in his testimony the conversation which took place between the partials on that nonagon. Bat the testimony of Senator Fuller is that Mr. Pattierson Was not in the room while he was there. Here, then, is a liat contradiction between these two witnelees but tine committee have.no doubt, from the evidence before them, and from all the ciircumetanoes of the ease, that the testimony of Senator Fuller is literally true. It appears from the testimony before the cornmittee, thatlhere were other •members of the Legislature, besides Dr. 'Boyer, "to Whom offers of money and place weremade, to induce them to vote - for Simon Cameron for; United States Senator. Those who would come to an enlightened judgment in regard to this ques tion, may consult: the: testimony of Messrs. Graber, Wolf, Thomas,. and Hammer. , Mr. Graber testifies that Mr. Henry Tho mas, at his own house, and in a private interview between them, urged him to vole . for General Cameron for United States Senator, atatisked Mr. Graber to make his 'Own lighreie if he Could do anything. ; He 'moreover insisted' en Mi. Graber ,go with him, at a late hour of the night, - to See General Cameron at his own house, and • proposed to 'take 'him in riage ; but Mr. Graber did'not consent to any of these proposals. -Mr. Wolf's testimony is that Mr. Henry Thomas said to him, "go for General Cameron, and you shall be well paid. State how Ouch you will take to vote for General Cameron— put down the " figures." It is alsb in fvidence that Mr. John L. Hammir told'Mr. Wolf that he could make five thousand dollars by voting for General Cameron ; and again, that he (Mr. Wolf) could make a nice thing out of it There is one other fact which has been dearly brought to view in the course of the investigation, and which doubtless has some bearing upon the question before the commit tee. It is this, that General Cameron enter tained a strong desire to be elected Li) the Senate of the United States. The proof of this is so abundant that hardly any one who reads the testimony herewith - submitted will call it in question. It is seen in the anxiety which Was manifested"on the part of General Cameron, as brought to light in the statement of Mr. Pen neman, to ascertain whether he. could or could not secure the vote ef Mr. Nelsen, a Demo cratic member from W ayne .. It le seen , more- Over, in the' repeatedinteriiews which General Cameron held with Dr. Boyer, as stated by Messrs. Brobet and Patterson, in order to se cure the vote of Dr.-Boyer. True, we are told by. Mr. Patterson that General ameron said to him, in their accidental interview. at 'the post office, that' he was not 'a candidate ;• but he also testifies that. General Cameron - told him en the following morning, that he would he thankful to him for anything 'he could do for him. Aooordingly,Mr. Patterson immediately commenced his efforts, and continued them till the latest hour, to secure for General Cameron the vote of Di. Bayer. Such is a brief ootline of factsund airouth stan6es were brought to light . in the course of the investigation. Your committee are therefore of the npinion that the testimony before them justifies the following conclusion That unlawful means ware, employed to se cure the election - of Simon Cameron io the Senate of the United. StateNin last January. Your committee offer the following resolu• Lion : Resolved, That they be discharged from the further consideration of the subject • .8, WAKEFIELD, Chairman. • D. 'CAINE, • F. J. BARGER, • • C. L. PERSHING,' TESTIMONY OF T. J. BOYER Question. Will you state, fully everything which occurred between yourself and all other persons relative to your voting for Simon Cameron for United Staten Senator ? Answer. Some time in the week of the commencement - of this session of the Legisla ture, after 'my return from Philadelphia, I met Mr. William Beebet at the Pennsylvania House, in this city; after several meetings he 'asked me to see me privately; 'I invited him to my room, and after a brief ConversatiOn, relating to things in general, be commenced reviling the different prominent Democratic candidates for United States Senator, and closed by ex ; pressing : his deoided preference for Simon Cameron for that position; I then asked him what he meant by that; he answered that: he wanted to see &ion. Cameron• elected to the United States. Senate. or something like that; asked him to explain his' motive; he said that Frank. Bughes had pursued him in - a law suit and cheated him out of a large amount of property belonging to the Brobet estate, and that he wanted to mike some money rani he have revenge ort.him ; I asked him bow he eXr petted .to make the money ; be said out of. Si mon Cameron ; I asked him how this could be done;`he said' by voting for him for t hat office ; I asked him how much Simon would pay for IL vote; 'I told him at the' same tinte„to . say -no thing but the,truth—nothing but what he was authorized to say ; previous to what I have Isin, said I asked him whether he was autherizrd by Cameron to come to me in regard to this mat ter; be said he was authorized, to go, to oily one and enter into• the preliminary arrange ments for a vote ; he replied to my question, above stated, he was authorized to offer five thousand dollars.; .I asked him whether he meant to vote or absent myself at the time; he said he wanted some man to go away—he was getting some others. to do the same Ihing'; he did.not say who the' others, ere; I then told him the amount' was too smalt=l