From 'Washington. The Homestead Bilh Correspondence of the Ni Y. Tribune', Washington, Feb. 1, 1859, No doubt, ere this The Tribune has publish ed and criticised the rote in the -House to-day on the Homestead' bill." A few facts and sug gestions may be valueless,-though they be repetitions.’* c ’ v ' - - - A bill like that which has just passed, was introduced by Mr. Grow in the last Congress, but was not definitively acted upon. The pre sent bill was introduced-by him early last Sess ion, and referred to the Committee on Agricul ture. Owing to the time absorbed by Leoomp ton, nothing was done in regard to it, Mr. Kelsey, from the Committee on Agriculture, now reported the bill back to the House, and it was referred to the Committee of the Whole.— To-day the vote by which it was so referred was reconsidered. This brought it directly before the House. Grow and its active friends decided that they‘would put it upon its passage. On his demanding the previous question on its third reading, a tumult arose, and a variety of riTort were' made to coax, and wheedle and drive Grow to yield the floor,'so as to get in amendments and dilatory motions. But he kept a steady hand upon the tiller, determined that the measure should ride out the storm in safety if possible. Before the demand for the previous question was seconded, Hughes (who is always on the wing in foul weather,) moved to lay the bill on the table. The Yeas and Nays silenced his croaking, by the significant vote of 77 to 113, It now being evident that a large majority of the House was favorable to the measure, the attempt to swamp it by imprac ticable amendments, and side-motions, was re mewed, Keitt, and Maynard of Tennessee, try ing their skill at this line of attack. But, Grow held on firmly ; the demand for the pre v ions question was seconded ; the main ques tion ordered, and the hill read a third time.— Grow now demanded the previous question on its final passage. Ere it was seconded, Hum phrey Marshall endeavored to overwhelm it with questions of order. But, the Speaker rulpd against him—“a sufficient number up, and “there is a second"—“the Veils . have it, and the “main question is ordered; “and now, | “Shall the “bill pass?” Barksdale demanded i lira Yeas’and Nays; and this benign measure, laden with blessings to the industrious poor, j safely, triumphantly passed the ordeal ; Yeas 120, Nays 7G. The victory was made sure by the stereotyped formula of moving to reconsid er, and lay on the table. Nothing remained but the adoption of the title of the bill, on which Grow calfed the previous question.— Wright, of Georgia (the slaveholder died hard 1), proposed to fillibuster about the j title. It was too late. The title, under the operation of the previous question, was adopted, and the good day’s work was done 1 This vitally Democratic measure received the votes of 82 Republicans, S Auti-Lecompton Democrats, and 30 Lccompton Democrats.—lt encountered the Nays of 1 Republican (thank heaven, only one ’). 2 Anti-Lecompton Demo crats, GO Lccompton Democrats, and IS South Americans. The single Republican who voted agalust it was Matthias 11. Nichols of Ohio. The two ( hostile Ami-Lecompton Democrats wore Sam- i uel S. Marshall and Aaron Shaw, both of lUI- ■ nols. Neither of these three gentleman is re-' turned to tho=nest House. The sixty Lecomp tun Democrats are composed of fifty-sis slave-: holders and four doughfaces, to wit: KugUsh, Hughes and Niblack or Indiana, and Leidy of Dcnnsyh ania. The slaveholders voted against it because they despise free labor, and the doughfaces, because they lore to servo slave holders, The South Americans voted against the bid because it allowed aliens, who had only declared their intention to become citizens, to paitioipate in its benefits. The State of New-York voted thus : I'-r th* U.(l— Andrews, Bart. Burroughs, C. ft. Coch-an. ,Vih>i OMiran, Corning. Dodd. l:< nton, Good* In, Granger. ILiskiu. Hatch. Hn.ird. Kelsey. MacUy. Mailc-un. Morjwni M Muiraj, Olm. Palmer. Parker. Pottle, Uussel. ?i>in r.r. Administrator’* police. LETTERS of Administration bavin? to the undersigned on the estate ol BODGE, late of Sullivan township, dee d.> indebted to said estate are required tomak« payment, and those having claims again! will present them for settlement to , ; n v. CALVIN REYNOLD* Elk Run, Feb. 10, 1859, fit UNION ACADEJIV A. R, WIGHXMAN, A. 8., PriMip* l J. S. WIGHTMAN, IWeaptrt I, G. HOYT, & a ‘ her ; '&> THE Spring Term of this Institution m* March Ist, 1859* EXPENSES PER TERM* Tuition in Primary Branches, • “ , 3*J Common English, - - - - ' Higher English,, - , Languages, Board, - - - * ' , 1* Room for those boarding thorns**™ 1 1»? Fuel, - - - - * '•iVortO'.ij Lessons on Melodeon and Piano wit Instrument, . Acoommodations furnished f° r _7?. r Pn**'?* board themselves, “ E. B, T*K*> Deerfield, Feb. 10, 1859.