gil THE O'CONNOR-TACK . CASE. (Contlnud You state it all nowspirstantialle. A. I state it all substantially. -And..l made use of the nhrase that I would crush them or push them to the wall. Well, sir, we talked, of, it about .half an hour. That is the meaning of it. That 'is mot all that we said,. but is thesubsttmce of it. , • Q. lid you say to Iff.r.liolomon Shea, of Pittsburgh, that me matter how this suit turned out you would ruin these Tacks, or words to that effect? • ,A. Not that I : recollect of. Thad. several • conversations with Mr. Solomon Shea, but do not.recollect using that language. • Did you not send a dispatch to - tir. Dan. Miller at tho time you were selling 0-,611. through the Tacks, that you had oil on ' hand to till your contracts? . •A. I sent a! dispatch to Mr. Daniel 10, Thai you had oil on hand to fill your contracts? A. I do not think that is the language of the dispatch. If you show tne.the dtspatch I may answer more accurately. , Q. Have you ever.. .said to anybody that the purpose of bringing;this criminal suit was to get your money? . - A. I nave sworn I, have . said both, that my ,purpose in bringingthis 'criminal pros ecution, was to get justice and to get my money back. • .1 - Q. ~R estitution" was your word,' vas it not? • . Ai I think , ' to get my money backs' was exact phraseology. n Q.' Did you not employ counsel to onable you to restitution? . • Q. , At Pittahnrgh? A. Pittisliurgh and Philadelphia both. Q..lnthis,Cilse? Ao . l.n.this case. ~ -• , Q. I uuderstood Pittsburgh say 1114 that you been a resident- of Pittsburgh for a number -,of yeAril!, And that in 1864-5 • your business was that of refining oil? ' . A. Prom the date in 1864 to the date in 1865 that I have already mentioned: : - Q. Q.-Before that you were engaged in the banking, business? , - _ A. I was at that time president of a'bank and also special partner in the Keystone (:;0111 Refineryi _ • . t, Q. Of what bank were you pregident at that time—the ; Fourth. National or lifex chants' and Manufacturers'Eank? ' • [Objected tb. Objection sustained.] 1 Q. Did yo telegraph, Mr, John Sedge wick, your counsel in New York, of the departure of r. Tack for Europe ? , A. I sent I, r. SedgeWiek, after my re-' turn frc3m tikes Y9rk;sevenil dispatches. Q. Did yon send him one suclias that I t i o ,have indica ed to you—that Theo. Tack [O - was, going . Europe? • • • . .i • Q:: You s ed you arrested him, I think - , on.the 24th or August? A.:l do not think I named any day. .Q. Then We wfil allow you to name it. now. When was it,? • A. .I do not recollect the exact , dav 'but it , was in August. . Q. Was it in the beginning? •.- A. No, sir; it was atter the 22d of August. Q. How much after the 22d? A:. / think probably the. 23d or 24th of • - • .Q. You are now alludingto the arrest In. :New York Y • : . • A. Ism.. • .• ~ . . Q. Did yOu send any Message to Mr. Sedgewick . after that upon 'the subject of Theo. Tack's departure from Europe? ' - A. After I returned to Philadelphia I saw a newspaperln the Continental stating that • ho hadsailed, not on the Perriere, but on a ' succeeding steamer; he had found he could not get on the Perriere and intended to go on another steamer. And that newspaper I ~ showed to General Collis, illy counsel, and • i4fiegraphed -to Mr. Sedgewick that fact. That was after'llidd been to New York and returned: ' And we found that, not to be - the easti . —that he had 'bought his ticket a second time but had not got off the second. • time: - Q. You arrested him again? - A. I arrested him in 'New York city a second time on a New York warrant. Q. And ho was-again discharged? ' A. 'That I do not know—about his dis charge of my own knowledge ; I was not " there: • Q. And you know that he u - :113 not brought back here bynny one? A. Do yon want me to tell all about it? Q. I want you to say that—that you know he was not brought back hero by any offt- A; Ha' was' not brought back by the tdfi- Q. He was not brought baek by any aft . cer ? - A: Be' - was not brought back by any offi cer, I believe. but 1 believe he was brought into Alderman Beitler's Office, that he was inthatge of an officer: ''Q. In charge of an officer ? 'A: 'Either he or An stun Tack. Q. Were- you at Alderman 13eitlei's of- A. Yes ' sir.' - Q. Thefirit time. A. No, not the first time. 'You have - volunteered to say you saw them , (the Ticks) brouipt. before that Al dernian.by an officer. '\ow do fnean to say 'that?" " • - Mijected ; ; - .v.. I want io know if Yeu'mean to sWear and tell that jury, that you werepresent and ,saw them brought into the office in-compa .; .•py with an officer ? . 4.. I meanite:nay that of my own knowl , edge I saw One of the Tacks, in Alderman Beitler's office—that Iliad :sent' an officer ~with express instauctions to bring him in; pr; kaher came in with him ar the nio merit or. joined hint at the time • ' • Q. "lonned the officer ? ' ; ;The eilicerjpined luiu.' • - .Q. .W,ho, waatbe officer: • A. It pas either 14gart or Smith, or one Ofthose people. . Q. We, want the man you saW. • • A. My present recollection is. •it - Was , George Smith; but if it was not him it was ' his partner.. There, were several officers ,employed about , tlfis matter. ' • • • , • -.Q. Iwant to know which officer it was. A. Well, to the best of my recollection, I think it,wnsGeorge fr3mitti or his partner, Ihadany‘handi veryttill of this matter and it was impossible for me tp tell nt the mo. went. This to, the best of my knowledge .and . • i f . [Re-examined' by District-Attorney . Mann :j , • - - " • : . Q. • You were asked insegard to whether there was a tander - of oil-,to you; and i you said there was not, a tender of oil to TOM (What wzis Said or, done by Mr. Tack in the' texture or character of : a tender? •,. • A. The .first time Mr. Augustus Tack camelo.the,Continental, he came up to me - with Mr.: Wilcoxin his, company, I was seatedi•llbelleve, in'the rotunda or near the • book-stand of the Continental Hotel. He , came up_tome with a large roll 'of papers, • icanudfil4r a . parcel 'of certificates of oil; and of having been gauged by Inspectors; a "whole moluminOus :matter, being - What are termed by oil broltersi : fi papers netew Ear2:to make a tender 0011." - ./trprosence , • 'of - 011 r-:Wiloht be called .sur.attention • to these papers. tttrued around arid :sulked he wanted me toiread all r Mime I •,.i. , ,,aerel•know what his reply was, , 44 .1ardght or • :I Might nbt.+l i :asked. what it was • .stbout. He bald .then it. was itivltitth• they 1,...:4-ereboond to . deliver to•naei and if I would. f, ! pay - .Mut:. whatever . the bill whd:(o.• large. amounto—quite a number of thousan d dol lars);ilaskked, him.if these were thYplipera, lie was abing to .:leave 'them with me.. • •He said' -no,-rt I: paid mimeo ,marly. .; :r-,thouttandidollars- rAly 'answer wai to, refer: •him tartly counsel,' flt i ta e?3 ,..,.,,, ,eekt, take: chartrae.W fthigaglidneft The second ,- , time - falevr,Mr..l/akdOhe. eamelo•thy room din the!continentidi Oltd•Siont into(Shel heh. MAAvarlor ttp_stairs ; and he had vCtNil Luaß. with :: , 1ib: 114 4- )1e had also a pareel of. documents. Thh, . time I gave him a very short answer, inti mating that I did not want to be annoyed • by any such things; that I referred him to Col. Wm. B. Mann, who would take Charge of this entire matter. Thereupon the three gentlemen (Lockhart, Long and Taoki). walked out of the gentleman's parlor. - That was what really occurred 'in detail; so' far "as I can recollect new, , coneerning wig was termed "a tender of oil." In both 'in.: stances I referred them - to my counsel; I don't know whether I named any partici:l.; lar one; the second time I'intined yourself. Q. Mr. Cassidy- asked you' whether you did not deem yourself posted'as to the con dition of the crude oil market. At the time the Tacks spoke to you of these con tracts—were you pasted then? "A. Prior to that time I was posted on the crude market, - because I had given it con siderable attention. - • Q.• What was the price of crude oil at that time? • . • A. Well, • I had frequent conversattons about the crude with a great many persons; doubtless, among others, with Mr. Tack. It depended upon the time, the month, as to how crude oil was. • , Q. What was it about? _ - . A. Well, when- I -first spoke' to him the price probably was higher than what it was subsequently. Crude oilment dovin very low; it was falling up to June. Q. Was there a large or small , stock of oil on hand in June? ' A. At what place? Q. - At Pittsburgh, or where it was taken to be refined? . 'A. My conversations with him had been mostly in regard to the stock of oil, dm., up in the oil regions. There was a large sup ply there. I had no personal knowledge of the exact amount in Pittsburgh and its .vicinity, because I did not make direct in quiries myself, but I can tell you what per sons had asserted there was. Q. Then you know nothing of the condi tion of the market there in crude oil, or what the future prospects would be except what the Tacks told you? " • ' A.• .I knew from my own knowledge,nl and also froin every information could gather from every source, that the stock of crude oil up in the oil regions was very large and accumulating. In these conversations that was always admitted; and the exact amount at Pittsburgh, at any particular time, it .would be almost impossible to,tell, unless a man'went to each particular.refinery, and measured each tank. But there was a large stock, a very large stock in Pittsburgh at tho time. • • - Q.: (By=-Mr. Cassidy.] These papers thst were Shown you were warehouse receipts and other' evidences of title?, A. I have no doubt they,Were.- Tasked him • (Aug. Tack). it.' , Should keep them (they were very large and voluminotia;) and he said I. should.. if paid hitu the money. WILLIAM W. WEIIIER was sworn as a witness for the prosecution: - lam a freight agent-for the Pennsylvania Railroad. and am stationed at Thirteenth and Market streets. Q. Have you been asked to prepare a .statement 'of the amount of oil which came over your road during certain months? A. Yes, sir. These are the statements which were furnished. , Q. Be good enough testate the month and the number of barrels which came over the 'road in each month. • A. Tho two statements here should have been condensed. Q. Give,the sum total of each month. A. [ln regard to one of two . papers which Witness holds in his hands, he remarks] : This statement is gotten up from the books at Thirteenth and Market : ' • ; [Reads' June, 1867. July, Aug. " Sept. " Oct.= • - Nov. Dec. " • 514/5 . 13b1.; also, 259 1)1318. 98,308 " 50,120 " • 61,036. " 4' 73,334 • " 56,650 . 4, • 28,134 " • • 424,857 Total Which came over the Pcumsylvania Rail road from June Ist to December 31st. The other statement is from West Philadelphia, and is for oil unloaded at the oil platform during same months, and not included in this other. paper, 844 barrels in the aggre gate. Q. Those two aggregate amounts repro. sent the whole amount of oil that came over the Pennsylvania Railroad in these months? A. Yes, sir. That is, refined oil Cross-examined. Q. .[By cpunsel for defendant.] Do you know how that compares with other sea sons?. - _ ' A. No, sir. Q. Where was this oil stored? A. It was delivered at different points Point Breeze, Gibson's Point and Green with Point. These Were all principal. points. Q. [By _prosecution.] 'Being all points in the neighborhood of this city and for use here? - A. Yes, sir Q. For use or shipment here. The own ers store it at points in the vicinity of this city? A. Yes, sir. . Q. Was that all bondeiloil? • A. That I cannot answer. • Q. Can von tell us where that oil canto from?' A. Not entirely. Q. Can, you 'answer from what point it was shipped?' A. The principal part was shipped from what wo call Allegheny Junction, that Is junction of the Western Pennsylvania Rail-. road and Allegheny Valley Railroad. [Witness proceeds to state.] A. From the evidence or statements that I have, I would say this all came over • the Penntrylvanin - Railroad. It .includes oil over the - Philadelphia and Erle road, and oil from Cleveland, if any such came. Q. It includes only refined, not crude oil? A. Not ernde. • Q. Does not all that oil go in the bonded warehouse? 'A. It is my impreasion that it, does, the principal part. lA'rfaitAx SHARPLESS, witness for the COMmonlyealth, r was etworit., I am employed at Thirteenth and Market streets, in the freight depPt of the Pennsyl vania Railroad Company. Q. Have you prepared a statement of the amountof crude oil that came ever tho rail road? • , A. Yes, sir; in this statementthe crude oil is not divided frojil retlned. r can 4uit give you the crude alone. have got the 'digerenee. of credo for the seven months ,altogether it is 115,824 barrels; Juno 60,647; July '117,311; „August 138,208: September 77 0 333; October 09,405; Novara ber.7s,42l; Decembor42;22B. Refined' and crude. together.. Q. That is 415;824 in lublition,lo :the '424,- 00; which .would-make?', • ' , . A. 510,1381. barrels altogether: othezketuanined [By defendant.] That, Inchides all the oil that , came