S SL - L " ttHK l rmr ISSET) DAILY (SUNDAYS EXCEPTED) IptlßDl B JOHN W. FOKNIST. I OJTICK *O. m BOOTH FODHrH bTHBM. [ THIS DAII.Y FBESS, ft OltT Bnb«.riber«. to *«»«: or »wb«ttC<«™ M« aUr , jjtsg I Carrier. M»U.d to BatoMl o<)i i Aas AKD Fiftt oraM PomamJbe MBW. T Do!I1RS akp tmm m. POB HI BOIJTBS. s ittTArlahlj la »dr»us. tot Cant re* Thebh bo*th». towrlrt at ft. anal ratea. M* TKI-WHSRI/Y PB*SS. y.iiea to flabiorlbara. Fits Dollass psa Aiwra. la advance. FRIDAY, MAY 26, 1865. The Rebel Bureau of Assassination. The archives surrendered by General Jo. Johnston to General Schofield pro bably contain evidences of the guilt of the rebel leaders that are even more conclu- B iye than the documents accidentally found s t Richmond. A letter selected from them fl-as offered in evidence before the Military Commission on Monday, which proves that Jspfeksos Davis welcomed and encou jaged assassins. Lieut. W. Alls row, whose pride in his social connections, education at the. Alabama University, and appeal to npig Excellency, President 0. P. Ameri ca," for his “fuff confidence,” stamp him as a scion of the “first family,” and a jnodcl of Southern chivalry, in November last solicited “detached service" in the North, for purposes which he describes thus: 111 „ jji proceed, ae soon Mmy health will permit, to rid m; country of some of her deadliest enemies, by rtrtkins ol the very heart's blood ol tuoae who Bank t 0 enchain her In slavery. I consider nothing dls> honorable having snob a tendency.” It could scarcely be expected that Davis would respond like a just and honest man, by directing the arrest and punishment of this infamous villain ; hut his natural course, if he had not been nourishing schemes of murder, was to have been only criminally careless, and to have treated this proposal with contempt. The endorse ment showß, however, that young All sios’g letter was carefully treasured. It was “ respectfully referred, by direction of the President, to the honorable Secretary of War,” and the rebel Assistant Secretary of War directed it to be recorded in the Record Book of the Adjutant General’s office, for further attention. There appears to have been a sort of Bureau of Assassina tion at Richmond, as our Government has bureaus of the different branches of the regular military service at Washington. The deference paid to the Alabama assas sin affords a fair index to the manner in which Booth’s previous proffers—backed op as they doubtless were, by the endorse ment of such a valuable agent as Beall— had been received. The Soldiers’ Orphans. We print in another column a very in teresting speech pronounced by Dr. Wil kes W oiitjiin gton. State Senator from the district composed of Chester, Dela ware, and Montgomery, in the Legislature, previous to the close of the last session, iu support of a bill making an appropriation for the education and maintenance daring the year 18C5 of the destitute orphan chil dren of the deceased soldiers and stilors from the State of Pennsylvania in the ser vice of the United States in the existing rebellion. It will be remembered that the Pennsylvania Central Railroad Company donated fifty thousand dollars for this pur pose, and Dr. Wobthinoton’s bill pro posed to add seventy-five thousand dollars to that liberal contribution. The bill passed both Houses, mainly through the exertions of Dr. W orthington, and became a law by the prompt signature of Gov. Curtin, who was one of its earliest and most ac tive advocates—thus showing in this, as in ail his acts, his disinterested attachment to the brave men who have fought for and saved the Republic. The Pennsylvania School Journal ; a periodical that is read by all the teachers of the young, and wields a large influence, speaking of Dr. Worthing ton's fine, effort, eays: “ it would, however, be an act of gross injustice to omit the name of the Hon. Wilmer Worthington,, the Senator from the Chester and Delaware district, in this connection. He it was who took np the question on its merits when it reached the Senate In a shape which, to say the least of It, nothing but entire misunderstanding of the object in view could have given it, and at once set himself to disabuse the Legislature and disseminate truer and nobler views. To his Intelligent course, dear explana tions, and persistent advocacy it Is, that the final passage of the amended bill, HOW a law, mainly due. To his efforts, therefore, next to Govoruor Curtin, eo many widows will owe relief from the burthens thus assumed by the State, and so many orphans the means of renderlrg themselves worthy, by proper training and education, of the noble names they hear.” Singular Consistency* We extract from a copy of the London Times which came to hand by the last mail, the following significant passage. It thus speaks of the temper with which the as sassination of Abraham Lincoln, our late President, has been borne and discussed in the United States: u in the meantime, It is due to the American press that we should record our testimony to the forbear ing and enlightened spirit In which some of our New York contemporaries have discussed the assassina tion and Its probable results. It seems as though the moderate and humane counsels of the mur dered President were more potent In his death than In his life, rebuking and silencing the wild ory for vengeance which might otherwise have been raised. At all events, the general attitude of the American people at Buch a crisis has been marked by a strik ing and honorable sense of responsibility, and con trasts favorably with the savage loyatty which gloated over the torments of Ravaillae and Da* miens. If vindictive sentiments could not be alto gether restrained, they have at least failed hitherto to acquire the mastery. 1 ’ As a decided contrast to many of its previously expressed opinions, this iB re markably and pleasantly absurd, strongly recalling to our memory the story of the gentleman who ran up to offer a mere ac quaintance his assistance in thrashing hia own toother. But on reaching them, and finding that his brother had already com pletely settled the question in dispute, he arranged matters with his fraternal re lative by shaking hands with him, patting him on the back, and begging him to let the poor devil off from the remainder of the physical punishment which might still be his due. The story further says that on an attempt of the prostrate individual to rise, he administered him a kick, with a savage expletive and an injunction to re main quiet. Whether subsequent facts may complete the very similitude we have pointed out remains to be Been. Should it do so, no parallel can be considered more thoroughly illustrative of the touching ho nesty of John Bull. The rumors that the rebel authorities had mined their Libby dungeon, and were determined to destroy all the Union sol diers whom they were starving, on the first indication of a successful rescue, were literally true. This is proved by the testi mony of Lieut. It. Burtley before the Military Commission. He belonged to the Signal Corps of the Army of the Potomac, and was shown the newly-planted torpedo which was designed to blow our men into eternity, shortly after his capture, in 1864. It seems that we have been warring with demons Tather than with men, and that their cruelty and barbarity exceeds the limits of the human imagination. f PKVT.’ftYI.VA>' IA KSGIMBtITS TO BIS MUSTERED pnT —The following Pennsylvania regiments be longing to the Army of the Potomac, tools part In the grand review at Washington, and will bo mns out of the service upon their arrival In this OAVAI.BT—Ist, ad, 6th, 17th, and 20th Regiments. Corps— 4sth. 47th, 48 h. 50th, llmenfs ’ 2ootl1 ' 207 th * 208tll > 209tll > and 211th lie -11 St’h * lila t 7l ! • Bsth ’ ,07ell > th, Regiments! 142d ' 156 Ui > 190 tu > 101 st > ! »sth, and 210th Si cond C'srps—3lßt, 530, 67th. 60th SQ‘h inv-h pffiMi'sr * myor The following took part la the review of Sher. so 9 it’s army: Fourteenth Corps—Wth. Parma. Twentieth Corps— 2Bth, 29th, 46th, 73(3, luth, 147th. The Caso of Br. Blackburn, Toronto, c. W,. May 25.—1 d the ctse of Black •urn, or yellow fever notoriety, the magistrate to saia owing to the uncertainty of the Eng lish law required In Buoh cases of conspiracy, he should not assume the responsibility of deciding the but would send the prisoner before the judges •Uhe next assizes. Ball was aocepted lathe mean to the amount of $B,OOO, —• ■ ■ i " ' i VOL. B—NO. 256. THE TRIAL. Inquiry into the Treatment of Union Soldiers in Re bel Prisons. THE CHARACTER OF THE FOOD, THE PRI SONS, AND THE JAILORS. AN EVIDENT INTENTION TO MURDER OUR PRISONERS. The Members of the Rebel Senate and the Rebel Government Fully Aware of the Crnelty of their Underlings. EOIV LIBBY WAS MINED FOB A GENERAL, BUT NOT SLOW, MURDER, Testimony of a Eebel Guard Who Saw and Knows. Store Facts Marshalled Against Arnold and IHildd. OPENING OF THE DEFENCE Witnesses for Mrs. Suratt’s “Christiani ty,” General Good Character, and Near-Sightedness. ATTEMPT TO PROVE AN ALIBI FOR O’LAUCIILIN *WASHraaToir, May 25.—me court met at half past ten o’clock. Mr. Cox© called attention to an error in the re* cord. On Monday Marshal McPhail presented the firm of the oath of allegiance) and judged it bore the signature of Mr. O’Loughlin, bat the witness had not sufficient knowledge of the handwriting to swear to It positively, therefore, It was not received as evidence, and was ruled ont by the Judge Advo cate. Ho (Mr. coxe) did not, as stated, ask for the roadies, bat objected to It. He knew or no other way to correct the testimony than to ask that It be ex cluded from the evidence. The Judge Advoca e General said that that was. right, and so the request of Mr. Ooxe was compiled with. Testimony of Yoltalre BnntlaUi Knew the prisoner Arnold; be examined the prisoner’s carpebbag, and loandlnitsoina papers, Ittverr, cl’.tblDg, a revolver, and cut-ridges* By Judge Advocate Holt: Q,. Will yon look- at this revolver 1 (the revolver was handed to the witness.) A. This is the same revolver ; 1 made a nmiue examination at the time ; I examined It on the tnoimrg of ihe 17th ol April, at Fortress Mon* rce ; the pistol was loaded, and is loaded at this time. The court ordered the pistol to be discharged. By Mr. Ewing: It was at the store of John W. 'Wiauon, a short dimuce from the fort. The witness stated, in reply to Judge Advocate Hole, that the number of the pistol la 164.557; General Howe remarked that the pistol was a Colt’s navy revolver. Tetillmouy of Major Slarsli.. Served is the military service as an officer In one of tie Maryland regiments from 1861 uatu the 31st of AogUßt, 1864;. he occupied the position of lieu tenant colonel; when he left the service he was a pt h oner or war, and eot fioed in the Libby Prison irotu the mb of June until the 21st of March, 1864. By Judge Advooate Holt; 4* State under whet circumstances you were oomiued, the it ameer of prlstnerf, and (be treatment you received from the rebel Government 1 A. I was captured three aid a half miles lrom Winchester, on tue Martins* burg road; I was In General IVldrov’s command, and was captured by G-eoeral Ewell’s corps, and taken to Winchester, where I was detained :ortwo wet-kB on acetuct of ill health; I was somewhat Bick, on account cf excess ol dut> and exposure; at the expiration of two weeks, my health having im proved, 1 was compelled to march toS'aaoton; I was treated kindly on the road by officers of the escort; when I arrived at Libby Prison the rations were small but tolerably fair at first; a half a loaf of bread was given to each man, with four ounces of meat, and several spoonsful of rice; after we had been there four months the meat, as a regular tolng, was stopped, and we received It only occasionally; the prisun authorities then deprived us of wheat biead,and gave us wbat. they called corn bread; It was of a coarse character; I have known the prisoners to be without meat three or four weeks at a tixue; in addition to tbe: miserable corn-bread, a few potatoes were occasionally distributed, or cue very worst character; this continued for some time, when the officers held a meeting with regard to the bad treatment wbloh they had received letter was sent to Cel. Ould by Gen. Straight, who was chairman of the meeting, complaining of the bad treatment, and asking for improvementto this Col. Ould replied, ,L The treatment was good enough, and better than the rebel prisoners received at Fort Delaware and otner placesOuld was the rebel lommisaloner of Exchange. The witness continued : After I had been in Libby Prison five months I was taken slok with dropsy, for want of proper nourishment, and sent to the hospital; while there 1. saw men brought la from Belle Isle; their condition was horrible in the extreme; I was satisfied that they were In a BTarTix-g condition ; out of forty at least eight or twelve died the first Sight; I asked the surgeon In charge of the hospital, who was very klQd to ns at first, what was the matter with these men; he replied their condition was owing to want of proper treatment and nourishment, and neglect; l had been there about two weeks when two of our officers made their escape; Major Turner, In charge ol the prisoners, was passionate and Insulting whenever he ehise to speak ; betook it Into hts head to re move us back from the hospital to Libby prison; the room to which we were removed was wet with the washing of it out; some of the slok were in a dying oobditlon, anu-were com palled to remain there twenty-four hours without cots or a morsel to eat, as a punishment because the two officers es caped; the treatment, I repeat, was very harsh; Uol. fowler spoke to Majur Turner with re gard to the bad treatment, when the latter replied, *“ Ic is too d—d good for yoa Yankees the opportunity 1 had for teeing the bad treatment was wnen men were brought to the ho?pUal; they weieemaciated Jar want of food; when food was brought within their reach they were eager to get it, and They would grasp at It. q_. Was there any pretence that this treatment was the result of necessity, tr that the; lad not food tr ough 1 A. All the reply I could get was that it was a matter or retaliation, and that their prisoners were treated worse than ours. q. What proportion did the food bear to a ration, or tor the comfortable support of tile 1 Was it one half or one-quarter 1 A. A man could possibly live ci> wbat was first given, although not a fall ration; a man could sot possibly live on it all the time; wbat was called corn bread appeared to be meal and bran mixed, and caked in a tough condition; for cays we lived on that and water alone. Tebtimouy of Captain Emory. Was in the military service, and was captured at Winchester on t&elStn of Judo, 1863, and exchanged on the 4th of May, 1864. He Btated substantially the seme as the preceding witness In respect to the food and baa treatment received by the Union prisoners. The money belonging to the prisoners was taken away from them, and therefore they could not buy food ; the bearlog of the rebel keeper of the prUon was very rude; he always abused the prisoners 5 when the latter were brought to the hospital their condition was awful—from the result, as it was generally understood, of starva tion* After the battle of Chtokamaaga fifteen or sixteen et these sick personers were tied on a cart, to keep them from fajUcg off, although there were ambulances near by not m use. They were tied like sacks of grain. The witness said he had to lie on the floor lor a long time, aod had not yet recovered his strength. The committee of the rebel Senate knew 01 their horrible treattte&t, but did not notice them on their visit. Ou one occasion he tile the men he wanted some medicine. Turner said he. had none to give him.and added: “The treatment Is good enough for Yankees.” An la- Rector of the prison, named Tamer, said the or.ject of the treatment was to kill the prisoners, acting: “It Is good enouuh for you. You had no t utinets to come here. If I had command X would hang all of you.” Testimony of Bonj* Swearer. By Judge Advocaio Holt: Q,. State to the court whither you have been In the military Service 07 the united States, A. I have; IWM color sergeant in 1 he regiment to which I belong. Q.. State whether or not you'was a prisoner of I was; I was captured on the 18 b or October, 18(53. Q.. State how long after your capture you con* tinned a prisoner ot war, and at what point you were confined. A. Five months and seven days; I was confined at Belle lute. primers were confined with you? A. When I lelfi there were about thirteen thousand there. 4- Were ttey kept In buildings, or simply on the naked sand ! A. On the naked sand of the island. Q. In what season or the year ! a. in winter. Q. Were they provided with any shelter! A, Some were. Cl. What proportion of them! A. I judge about ont-half^ C l . What kind of treatment did you reoeive 1 a. We had about half enough food to live on. Ct Oi what did the rations consist! A. There were twenty-five pounds of meat served up for one hundred icen, and a big share of that was bone; ec-rne corn bread was browned up with It. Q. What opportunities had you for cooking it! A it wbb cooked for us. Q. What was the effsot of this system of starva tion upon the health of tbo men! A. It was very marked; the men had nothing else to live on, and 1 have seen men on that island starved to more than that, the bodies of those who died were allowed to lie for eight, or nine days la the trenches without being buried; tuey would not allow us to bury them: they laid there, to the host* of my knowledge, from seven to Dine days. n, a 8 that the subject of romonßtrance on your part! a. I j udge it was; 1 B poke to the II tenant in charge oltbe prisoners on the Island, and he tele me he had nothing to do with It;-that ho had kipoTflcrsfrem Major Turner. Q., You say that they positively refused you per mission to bujy the.ceadl A. Yes, sir; I asked as a personal prisoners of war were there at the time or your confinement? A 1 tfciok that alto gether there were In the neighborhood of 32.000. Q.. State what treatment they received from the rtbtl authorities while y* n were there. A. Tue treatment was very poor Indeed; they had no Bhetcer whatever, but v ore compelled to live in a swamp; tbtlr blt'pfcets, hats, caps, their olothlog in general, and ibt'ir mruey, were taken from them. 6. You say they were compelled to live In a Bw*tu>p? A. Yes, sir; the encampment was in a swamp. H Had it any shelter ? A. No shelter whatever. C£. State whether there was woodUnd in that vi cinity ? A. Yep, sir: there was splendid pine wood around tLerr—any quantity of it. Q. State the character of the rations served out? A. W«1I, sir, everv morning, when the wagon came mound, there would be served to each man half a pint ot o<>rn meal, two ounces of bieon, and a half tpooniil of salt; this waß all the rations for 21 hi urg. Q.. What was the ohaTaoter of the baoon? A. Will it was al-vc Q, Was It racld and rotten ? A. Yes, sir; once In a while we would get hold of a good piece, but net often. Q, what was the effect of this treatment on the heultii of the prlfonvre? A. it waa very hurtful, and killed them off; the largest number of deaths in any one day, so far ac my recollection goes, was 133 Q.. Was It not understood thero that most ofthese deaths were occasioned by starvation ? A. It was. Q,. Was any remonstrance addressed to the rebel authorities in regard to these things? A. Ido not think i here was. Q,. Did you hear any statement on that subject from the enemy ? A. Yes, sir* Q,. What did they say? A. They said they did not os re a d—n whether the Yankees died or not. U Do you reu en.ber whether a man by the name of Howell Cobh, formerly Secretary, of the Trea sury of the United States, visited Andersonvllle ? A. I do: he made a speech there; I think some time in February. Q, Do you remember (he tone Of that BpOOOh, OT what ho said in reference to the prisoners ? A. Ho n ace tome very bitter remarks; I do not reoolleot the exact terms- Q,. Were they in support of the policy whioh had been pursued in the treatment of prisoners, or ciherwhe 1 A. He said that was' the best they cruld do fer them, meaning the prisoners; that if the authorities looked after them a tittle more no doubt they would fare better; he only said a few wordp, end did not seem to care much about the prisoners. Q., You say the men died at the rate of 100 to 150 a da-- ? A. 1 think that the day on which the largest number of deaths occurred was cn tholl&b of September, When 133*w the prisoners died. Q. You i-av they wervin the open sun; WM thO h«-»x very griai? A. it was very intense, Indeed. Q,. How was the water? A. We wore obliged to drink* water which had bten made filthy in oon scquence of the garbage thrown In the creek above. 61- Did yen regard that as accidental or the work of design? A. Ido not know positively ; the rebels always threw theJr fiUhand waste matter Into the cie*h above, and the men got up a remonstrance, the reply to which was that they did not care a damn for the Y*nkee3. Q. Bow was the treatment in the prison : were many or the men shot ? a Yes, sir f when I first went there, in June, avmany as six or eight a day were shell dead. Q. DldK appear to you that they were shot in tv&itioxtuoes ? A If a man got half afoot over the dead line, or near it, he w»s shot j it was said that they got & thirty d&yo* furlough for shooting a Yankee. _ Q.. Do you remember whether Howell Cobb re ferred In hls’speeoh to the rebel emissaries at the North who were engaged in the work of firing north* em cities ? A. He made come remark about a plan to burn and plunder the North ; I cannot tell what we re the words used. Q. What was the treatment of prisoners who were sick In the hospitals!'A.-It was-very poor, inoeed ; they ?ot pitch-pine pills for tbe-dlarrhc**, pitch pme pills for the scurvy, and pitch-pine pills tor everything else ; they did' not get any regular medicine. Q. Of wbat were these pitch-pine pills composed? A. Of a little pitch ptne, the stuff that runs out of the trees there, axd a litiie vinegar; oncoia a whtte the patients would get a little medicine, or some* .tktag like it. Q,. Web any of yhe'mon«y taken from, the pris oners returned to them ? A. Hot a Cent. Q,. What was your expert:noe in regard to the taking oi your clothes and money ? a. When I was first captured they took my shovs off, and F walked barefoot to Goidor. sville; they then took from-me my blanket end clothe*, and for nine months I had nothing on but a pair of drawers and a shirtl laid there on the open ground lor nine months without a tot of shelter. Q.. Was that the common experience T A Yes, sir; there were thousands there in the samO'&x; the corpse or a man who died in the morning- could not be approached by Right WUrhla- twenty teat, and" pitchforks had to be ased to carry the body off to the trenches. By the Court; Q. Did yon hearany rauxms given for dtprlvlng the prisoners of their clothing 1 A. It was because they needed It for their Oiva use; I would state here that clothing was uet&fc there by our Government, and the rebel captain- in charge over the prisoners took It himself, and' this captain was in command of the Interior ofrthe prison; Uol. Gibbs commanded £ke post. ti. Was the quality of the provisions served out to you such that a man would not eat unless he was in a starving condition ?' A. Yes, sir; 1 would not think of Buoh a thing now, but & man in danger of starvation might eat them. Q. Do you think It possible to sustain life for any great length of time ossuoh foodlr a. I do not thinkamanpoulddolt a great while; up to tue day I left, which was the 2»t h o 3 March, 16,725. men had died there; that was the number taken from the books by myself. By Judge Holt:.Q,. What proportion of those deaths, in your judgment and the judgment of other prisoners, occurred from starvation and iu conse quence ol this treatment of wbloh you apeak? a. I have no doubt over one-half £ the food whioh they received was the cause of thetr sickness, and after they got sick they did not receive any better food. By the court: Q,. Was there any medical treat ment given to those suffering prisoners t A. Tory little; indeed, nothing of any benefit. Testimony of £. W. Boss* By Judge Advocate Holt: Q,. State whether or not you have boon m the service ol the reoel Go vernment?: A- I never was in the army ; I was a clerk at Libby Prison. q,. Was you a clerk there in the month of Maroh, 1664 ? A. Yes, sir ; about that time General Kil patrick was making a raid In the vicinity of Rich mond, Q,. state what knowledge, If any you had, of Libby Prison having at that time been mined by the Confederate authorities 7 A, I never saw the powder, but I saw the place where they said the powder was burled ; I was away one night about that time, and when I came back iu the morning one of tie colored men at the prison told me that some powder had been put into the building ; when I went to roll call one of the officers asked me whether tttb powder was there, and I told him £ did not know certainly; 1 saw the luse In the office. Q,. Did you ever see the place where the powder was burled ? A. Yes, sir, frequently; two sentinels were p.aced over it .to keep persons from approach ing the place. q. Was the fuse kept In the office? A. Yes,sir; Major Turner had It In charge; it was an eight second fuse. q Did he state to you that the powder was there 1 A. Yes,sir; and also said that this fuse was togetltoff. , . * * Q,. m what event was this explosion to take place ? A. Iu case the raiders got into the city they could eet it off. . ' q. And blow, up the prison and the prisoners? A. That must have been their intention. Cl- How long did that powder remain there? A. In May they took it out secretly. Q.. Do you know whether the fact of its removal wa* kept a secret from the prisoners themselves ? A. 1 uo not. By the Court: Q,. Bid yen understand by whoso authority the powder wgfcput there! A, It was done while Winder wsb Secretary of War. t). state whether or not Major Turner, the keeper of the prison, did not seem to oe acting under the authority of the War Department! A. He never told me that he was acting under any orders In the matter, or even that the powder was there. Q. Was be net a subordinate Of the War Depart ment! A. Yes, sir. Testimony of John La Touche, By Judge Holt: Q,- State whether or not you have been m the service of the rebels 1 A* Yes, sir; 1 was in the Confederate States army. Q, state whether or sot you were ou duty at Bloby Prison in Match, 18641 A. I had been de tailed there, and was on duty at that place at that time. Q,. state what knowlege you have, if any, con cerning the mining of the Libby Prison about that lime by the Confederate authorities! A. Major Turner, the keeper orthe prison, told me one day that ho was going to b«o Gen. Winder about a guard; I believe we had no relief that day; when he returned he told me that Gen. Winder himself bsd been to see the Secretary of War, and that they were going to put powder In the building; In the evening of the same day the powder came there; it was in 25 pound kegs, which were contained In boxes, and altgether amounted to, I suppose, one hundred pounds; a hole was dug In the centre of tie middle basement, and the powder was put down there the ground was then covered over with gra vel ; I took one of the sentries from the outside of the building, and placed him over this powder, so u at no accident might occur 5 the post da; Major Turner Blowed us the fuse tke office; It was a long fu?©; “uu was mads of guttapercha; the pow* remained thereuntil, I think, sometime lu May, when fhe prisoners were all removed from the pri son ; Gen. Winder then sent a note to the office, with directions to take up tbo powder as secretly as possible; Idc not remember the exact word. Q. State whether you heard In what event the powder was to be setoff! A. I did not hear what time ; 1 heard him say afterwards that In case of the raiders coining into fiiohmond he would blow up the place. Q. Meaning the prison building and the prisoners inlt'l iGnppoeeso, Testimony of George H. SlcGee. By Judge Advocate Holt: State whether you know the prisoner at the bar, Samuel Arnold. A. I do! Q. State whether or not he has been In the mili tary service of the rebels! Mr. Ewing • I object. The ground of my objection 1b that Arnold Is hereon trial for having been en gaged In a conspiracy to do certain things, and that it is not competent for the Government to show, if such be the iaot, that before he entered Into this conspiracy he was In the military service of the Confederate States. He is not on trial for having bun in the military service of the Confederate States. He 1b not cn trlalforhavlog taken the oath of allegiance and broken It, for they may see fit to follow this up by a statement of that kind, as has been done in thecaseofO’Loughlln; he Is on trial for *n offence defined dearly In the charge and specifi cations, and it is not competent, it seems to me clearly not cud potent, to attempt to aggravate the offence with which he IB charged, and of which, they seek to prove him guilty by showing that he has been unfaithful to the Government in other respects and at other times; and It Is Introduced and can be introduced for no other purpose than that of aggra vating bis Illegal acteiD connection with this Cons pi racy. That course of testimony would be In effect allow)* g the prof eeution to introduce testimony as to the previous character ofthe accused; that Is a right •tl at is reserved to the accused vlways, and la never allowed to the prosecution. More than that, it would allow the prosecution to do what the accused is not allowed to do on his own behalf in the point of cha< meter—that fs, to Introduce specific aots from which hlf character may be inferred. Juripe Advocate Holt: I will make only a single remark. I think the testimony in this case baa proven what I believe to be sufficiently demonstra* five. How kindred to eaoh other are the armies of treason against the .nation and the assaßFl&attou of Its Chief Magistrate, The one seems to be a neces sary constquoQOo( ehd certainly U ls t a PHILADELPHIA, FRIDAY, MAY 25, 1865. logical from the other. The murder of the President of the United States, as alleged aid slows, was pre eminently a political assassination. Disloyalty to the Government was its sole, la only Inspiration. When, therefore, we shall show on the part of theacoueed acts of intense disloyalty, the bearltg of arms In the field against that Govern ment, we ehow the presence of an animus toward* ue Government which relieves this acoasatlonof much, 11 not alt, This course of proof Is constantly resoited to In otueroourts Ido not re paid It as m the slightest degree a departure from the usages of the profession. In the admlatitratloa of courts of justioe, the purpose to snow that the prisoner in his z»in«i avid in his course of lire was prepared for the ooiumtseion of this crime—-that the tendencies of hls life, as evidenced by open and overt sots, point to this crime, if not as a natural certainty, as a most probable result It Is la that view, and with that object, that the testimony i£ offer* d. Asriftant Judge Advocate Brinsrhatn referred to Rrecot.’s Criminal Evidence, page 85 or 87, as au thority for the rules of law chat when toe latent wn h whioh an act Is done in initial, other aots of the prtsener t« t initial, to the intent, may be glvfp Id evidence. It was alleged In the ouarge Bbd specifications that the prisoner Haridd, with others, engaued in a conspiracy to murder the Prrsldent of the United States and others with la tent to aty of Juba L. Valdwell. —- By Assistant Jain the woodedn the cay time. Q,. Whesu did they get their viotaals l A. I do hot know. Q. Did you see any victuals belngftaken to them? A. 1 saw victuals going that way often enough; I saw my Ulster, Mary Simms, taking them. Q.. How were these men dres9od?* A. Soma In gray and some in black clothes. Q. Who was present beside* yourself when Dr. Mudd 3aid he was going to send you to Richmond ? A. No pereon. Testimony of Sykcster Eglin, By Judge Holt!: Q,- Did you,live with Dr. Samuel A.. Mudd? A. I lived with his father, about a quarter of a mile off. Q. State whether you heard him say that he waß going to send anybody to Richmond ? A. I heard Mm say that he was to Bend Eleazor aad me and several others to Richmond. Cl, To whom was he talking at the time? A. To Jerry Dyer and Walter Bowie. Q.. Where did the conversation take place ? A. Dowugby my old master’s gate In the oat field, where the borseß were kept. Testimony of Ir. Washington (Colored ) By Judge Brlngham: Q. Do you know the pri soner, Dr. Samuel A. Mudd 1 A. I do. Q. Were you Mb slave ? A. Yes. Q. did you leave his bouse? «A« TUs Octo ber ocming two years. Q, State if, white you lived with. Dr, Mudd, you heard him say anything about President Lincoln ? A* I heard him cay he would not keep his seat long; I heard him say that Some time summer be fore last. Q.. Was snjbody talking with him at that time? A. There was a heap of gentlemen in the house; I do not know who they were. Q.. How were they dressed, and where did they sleep! A. Some had on gray olothes; some had little short jackets, with a peak behind; sometimes they slept in the house; sometimes down in the pines, not very far from the spring. Q,. State how they got their victuals? A. Some* - Hmes Dr. Mudd would carry it, sometimes the girl, Mary Simms; X did not stay about the house, hat I happened to be there one day as they were sitting down to dinner; Dr. Mudd set the children to watch while they were at dinner; the children said they were coming, and these men jumped up from the table and ran out the side door. Q. Did yon hear Dr. Mudd say anything about sending any one to Richmond 1 A. Yes *, he said to one of the men one day that he wonid send him to Richmond. OioES-examlned by Mr. Ewing: Q,. How many times did you notice these men In tbe woods ? A. They were- there for a week or more, and X saw them seven or eight times; they all went to gether in the night. Q,. Do you know their names?- A- I think one was Andrew Gwy^• I do not know the names of the others. Q.» W ere they ever there at any other time than that week ? A. I did not see them at any other time. Q. What other person saw them there? A, The woman Mary Simms who was in here first saw them there; her and another woman was in the room; I don't know any white person who saw them except Dr. Muod and his wife. Q. Did Mr. Best see them there? A. I do not know. Q.. Did any of tbe field hands or any of the neigh* bers See them? A. Ido not know of any. Q.. Where were tbe hones of tbese|mea kept ? A. They kept their hones In the stable, sometimes Milo sod sometimes Henry Hamm. Cl. What time In tbe Sommer was It you saw them there i a. I thick It was about August. Testimony of Milo feitDUtg, Colored, Examined by Judge Bingham ; Q. State whether ycu lived with tbe prisoner, Dr. Samuel A. Mudd? A Yes, I was Mb slave; I left his house the Friday belt re last Christmas. Q. State if, at any time while you stayed at Dr. Mudd’B house, you saw any men there? A. I saw two or three there last summer. Q. Where did the men stay? A. Sometimes in the bouse, and then down by the spring among the burtaes ; they slept down among the bushes. 0,-Did you see the bed down there 1 A. Yes; It was fired under a pine tree, with a blanket and rails at the head. Q- Where did they get their victuals ? A. From Dr. Mudd’s; sometimes my sister oarrled it to them ; sometimes they carried it thelrselves. Q. When your sister carrled|lt where was it put 1 A. Down by the Bpring. Q. Who took it away ? A. Sometimes John Sur ratt ; sometimes one of tbeothers. Q How did you know John Surratt 1 A. I heard them call him at the house. Q. What kind of a looking man was he ? A. He had light hair and whiskers and was a slim man. Q. When there were men In the bouse was any thing Bald by Dr. Mudd about watching ? A. He set some children to watching; if any one was coming they were to tell him. Q. Do you know whether anything was said about any one coming while |these men were in the home? A. Ido not. Q. How were they dressed ? A, They had on gray olothes with brass buttons. Q,. State if beard any talk between General Gardrer and Dr. Mudd about Mr. Lincoln? a. yrg j I heard Mr. Gardner say, “Lincoln was a G-d d—d son Of ft b—. and ought to have been killed long ago Dr. Mudd said “Yes, that was much after his mind 5“ that was some time last fall. Cross examined by Mr. Stone: Q* wo.*k In the house or in ttie field? A. Iu the field, bt* Bometlnits when I was at the house I took the horses Q,. How old are you? A. I reckon about fourteen years. Q, Would you know John H. Suratt If you were to see him ? A. I don’t know as I would now. Cl- Who pointed him cut to von? A. Dr. MUdd wiuld sat, ‘‘Take Mr. Suratt’s horse and carry him out tbthe stftble and feed him.” Q.. How often didyou see him? A. Two or three' times Q. How many came with him? A. Two or three. Q.. Where was it that you heard thtstalk between Mudd and Gardner ? a. At Beantowu. U.- How far is Brautown from your houss 1 A. About three mites $ i went up with him alter some liquor last eummer. tA Was there any body else there besides Mr. Gardner and Dr. A. There were some in there, but I didn’t know them. Q.. Was not Andrew Gwynn there with Suratt? A. Not as I know of; I saw him at Dr. Madd’fi father’s home; I never *aw Andrew Gwynn at Dr. Mood’s house. er. CL When wan the last time you saw John Suratt at Dr. Mudu’s ? a. Last winter. Q,.'Dld he stay alt i-letu ? A. Yes. Testimony of Wn». (colored.) By Judge Bringham; Q, state whether you were thr hiave vf a»d lived with Dr. Samuel A. Mudd? A. 1 married near him. Q. Do you know Ben Gardner, one of his neigh’ bo*B ? AvYerf; Ben Gardner was my wife’s master. 4- State If you heard auy conversation betweea Grticutraud Dr, Mudd about the battles on the KaipaLai nock ? A. Yes, I heard Mr. Gardner say to Dr -filudo, “Sam. wevavetbem hell down on the Beppabanoock ” Tue Ur. said, “ Yes, we did.” Gardner sain that old Stonewall' was the best of tho generals. Dr said, “Yts, he was quite a smart man.” Gardner said that Lee bad gone roundup lt t» Maryland, mat he was going to cross the river at Point of Books; remember that, and he would not be eurpißed ii they were there soon ;-he said that ip a short time be could take the oapltol, Washing ton, and have old Lincoln burned up in hts house. Dr Mudd s&td be would hot he surprised. Q. Slate wfa'ther Dr. Mudd made any objection? A* He did not- IxftUiU alien of Rachol Spencer (Col tml), By Judge Bringham. 4. State whether you were e B)a ve c-f the prisoner, Dir. Mudd 1 A. I was. I left him ip January last. 4- wnueyou-wereotDr- Mudd’a house, didyou see men oome there at times? a. Yea, at the time men were passing through there last summer, some five or six came mere. 4 What sort if a dress did they wear? A> A black blue; they slept in the pines, about twenty yan s from the house, near the spring. 4. Where did they get their victuals while they were there ? A. At the hi use; and sometimes Dr. Sfcm took the victuals to thetu. 4. When they would come Into the house, did he eey anything to any of the servants or boys aoout what they, were to do? A* I was In the kitchen; (hey raid they had to go to the door and watch. 4. Did you fae-ti tho namos cf any of the men who cetitd at Dr. Mudd’s house? A. Yes; Andrew Gwynn and Walter Bowie. 4. Did you tee a young man among those who visited there? A. Yes; he slept in the pines, too, Wien they were there laat summer. 4. Describe his sppearanoe. A. He was not very tPJ>; he was fair-iookicg and slender. 4. Do you remember his being there more than 01 ce last summer ? A; Ido not 4 Do y< u remember hearing Dr. Mudd say any thing about Richmond ? A. I-heard him tell one of his men l e. would fend him to Richmond. cross esemlued by Mr. Stone; 4 You say you saw tb*intJjere In the cummer 5 was it the first of the summer or tue i&*t ? a. I do not know ; it was wane weather; they all came together and went together; 1 believe they stayed at the Bpring about a we«k. 4. Where were their borsee? A. Iu the stable. 4 WasMr Bret Jlyrngthcrethatyear? A. Yes; to the beet ol my knowledge he oame there the win ter before. 4 Do you know whether Mr. Albion Brooke was living there at the time these men were there? A. Y©», he was. 4. Did Mr. Best and Mr. Brooke aIBO see these tt' ple? A. Yes, sir. By Mr. Brit glum: 4Do you know whether Al bion Brooke ever saw them or not. or did you mere ly suppose he did 1 He saw them. 4 Did be tell you he saw them, or how did you know it? a. He used to go with them; they were all fopelhift 4 Do you know whether Mr. Beet ever saw them or not? A. lam not positive whether he did or not. The Judge Advocate General bore Introduced that, reserving the right to introduce farther testi mony on the general tubject of the conspiracy, the prosecution would here close. IISTIMONY FOR THI DEFENCE. Mr. Aiken seated that, by agreement among the counsel ftrthe defence, tbey would just introduce testimony In behalf oi Mrs. Suratt, They would proceed as far as practicable this afternoon, but would not consider tne testimony closed la respect to any one until all the testimony lor the defence Tvaa In. I * - . Iteslimony of Father Wiggati By Mr. Alktn: Q. State yoor residence in this city and your occupation. A. My residence is Gan* ZKsa College,•'in this city. In F street, between Nfltb and Tenth; lam a clergyman. Q.. Are yon acquainted with the prisoner, Mary £» Suratt? lam, and have been for ten or eleren years Q. Has that acquaintance been of an Intimate character T A. I knew her very well. Q,. Ate you adfiuainted with her general raott* tatfthl have always heard every one speak very highly of her as a lady and a Carls clan. Q. In all that acquaintance has anything ever eonre to your knowledge that would Indicate an ua obrietlati character on her part 1 A. No; never. . Q. Are you acquainted with. Lewis J. Welchman? A Only very slightly; X taw him a few times; I am not well acquainted with him. Q. State whether from year knowledge he has ever been a student of divinity. Question objected to by Mr. Bf Ingham, on the ground that the purpose of the question was to Impeadh the character of. Welofcmen. He could not be contradicted la r*- speohto entirely immaterial matter. Mr. Aiken replied that the Intention was to im* peach WfclohUißn’B testimony in this and many other particulars, and, as the foundation had been laid in. the crosa.txaiLinafcloa, the question was a proper one. The objection was sustained by the court. Q. Was there In the city of Richmond a Oatholie Theologloal Institute? Question objeoted to.by Hr Bringbam, for the same reason as the lasteues tloTi, and 01-j notion sustained bv the cou/t. Q. In your acquaintance with Mrs Saratt, have you ever known of a detectlveoye sight on her part? A. No; not particularly. Cross-examined by Judge Holt: Q, Yosay yon know tbe character of tho prisoner, Mrs. Suratt, lor Christianity is good. Have yon any personal knowledge of herchaiactar for loyalty :»• N© my Intercourse with her has sever extended to political affairs. , q. You have bad Intercourse with hen as her pas tor during therebellioa* have you not.?* A*. I am nob her pastor. Q. How often have yon been in the habit of see ing her daring the rebellion 1 A. Sometimes not for six months; sometimes six weeks, and some* times as often as OBoaa week. Q. Have yon had free conversation with her ? A. My conversation would only betas- minutes, and ihen of a general character. Q Have you evor, since the rebellion, heard her utter one loyal sentiment ? A. Ido,not remember. Q Gan you spate, whether It la not’notorious among those wh<» knew anything ot he? that she Is intensely disloyal ?• A. I do spt remember that this thing was evir talked about at ail tiu since this last affair happened. Testimony of Father Boyle. By Mr. Aiken: P. State, your residence In this city and occupation. A. My residence is at St. Peter’s Üburoh; lam a Oathallo priest, Q. Are you acquainted with the prisoner, DSarv E. Suratt 1; A. X have some acquaintance with, her; I made her acquaintance some eight or nine years ago; I have merely met her casually some three on four times Since then Q. Pa you know anything of her general reputa tion ? A. I have always heard her spoken of as an estimable lady ; I never heard a word said to her dl&fui vantage. Q. In all your acquaintance with her did yon ever hear her utter a disloyal sentiment ? A. I never did. CroSfl-efftiniDefl by Judge Holt: Q,. Have you ever heard her utter a loyal sentiment ? A# I never heard much of her sentiments at all; I saw her so little, and at such long intervals, that I could not undertake to say what her general oharaoter for loyalty Is. Testimony of Father Stone Street. By Mr. Aiken: Q,. State your residence and oc cupation ? A. I reside at present In Washington ; 'I am paster of St Aloyslus Church. Q. Are sou acquainted with the prisoner, Mary E. Suratt? A. lam. . . „ „ q. How long have you been acquainted with her ? A. I fim met her, more than twenty years ago, in Alexandria 5 after that I did not see her fur years, and since then only In transit as I was pass log. Q. Have you not within the past two years been more intimate with her? A, X nave scarcely seen her. -, Q. Do you know her general reputation as a CnHstfan and a lady? A. I have always looked upon her as a proper Christian lady. Q.. Have you, in all your Intercourse with her, ever heard her utter a disloyal sentlmeat 1 A. Never; bat therfl'was no question of the kind at the time I knew her. x Cross-examined by Judge Holt. Q,. State how often you.have probably seen her since the begin* uteg of the rebellion. A. Ido not remember having seen her at all 5 1 have no knowledge whatever or ber ©haracter fur loyalty, except what I have seen in the papers. Testimony of Mrs. Eliza fiollabAn, By Mr, Aiken. Q,. Axe you acquainted with tbe prisoner. Mrs. Suratt? A X boarded with Mrs. Suratt from the 7th of February until the 10th of Are you acquainted with the prisoner Payne ? A. X never saw him as Payne; I saw the man pointed out as Payne at her house twice; he called himself Wood. Q,. Wbep did he first enme to Mrs. Suratt’a heuie? A. I saW him first there in February, aud the ECOf'Bd time curing the mouth of March. Q., state under what clrcumstanoes he came to Mrs- Snr&tt’s house, and how he Introduced hlm teir 1 A. Indeed Ido not know anything about It; 1 went Into the parlor and was Introduced to him as Mr. Wocd; I never changed a word with him at all- Q. Did he represent himself a Baptist preacher] A. I asked Miss Ann Suratt who he was; she said be was a Baptist minister; I said I did not think ha would convert many souls. [Laughter ] Q. At that time, how long did he remain at Mrs. Snratt’s house? a I never saw him but one night. Q. Did Mrs. Snratt keep a boardinghouse ? A. I do sot think she did: only my family and another ycurgjady boarded there. • Ct. Was the in the habit of giving people rooms in her house ? A. Ido not know anything about it: I never saw Mrs. Suratt wntfll X went tO board With ter; I never heard of her. , . Q,- How long did payne stay there when he came in March ? A. Ido not know; two or three days, I Q. When was the last time you saw him at Mrs. Suratt's house ? A. It was somo time in March 5 1 do not know the exact day; I thought he was a friend of theirs and never asked any questions about kirn; X think It was about the middle of the month; it was after the inauguration of the President, 1 O. Have you ever seen &e prisoner, Atzerott, at that house ? A. 1 have, though I never heard his name there. _ * q,. When was that ? A. I do not know ; I saw him come In at times ; the ladles oalled him u Port Tobacco.'* . r 6. Was any objection made on the part of any of lhe family to his beirg there ? A. I heard Mrs. bu r&tt say that she objected to Atzerott; that she would not board him; I heard her say at the table that she would rather he would not come there at all. Q,. Have you been Intimate with Mrs Suratt? A I cannot fay that I was intimate; I liked ner very much; she was a very kind lady to board with. Q,. ’ Did you have frequent conversations with her 7 A. Not very. b. Were you acquainted with J. Wilkes Booth T A. I have seen him at Mrs. Suratt’s; I met him once in the parlor. Q. Did he come frequently to Mrs. Suratt’s house? A. 1 never Bawhtm there but three or four times, H rd nwer met him but once. Q,. Did be spend most of the time when he oame there in company with Mrs. Suratt 7 A I think he did ; he would ask for John Suratt, and If he was pot there he would inquire for Mrs. Suratt. q. Have you leaned anything whlioboataing with Mrs. Snmtf cf her defective eyesfxfcf? A. 1 never saw her msd or sew after candle Hgftt. ' Q. Have yon been in the habit or sttoadfag church with Mrft Suratt? A. Yes;- daring Lent we went to church Verg often together. Q. Was she, during that time, constant in her re lfgh nsdUtleß? A. t believe so. Q. Whan was toe last time yon' saw her 2»n, J< bn H. Suratt, at her house? a. some time in March. Q. Have yonseen him Sfr the city sine# that time ? A. Ihavenotv’ Cross-examined by Judge Kbit: Q. You say yon sever saw Mrs. Suratt sew or rbad after dark; have yon not oiten met her In the parlor at gas-ligut? A. Yes. Q. Did she ever have any difficulty in recognizing you or any body she was acquainted With in the par lor by gaslight. A.-No, sir. leMloieny of Miss Honoris- Fitzpatrick By Mr. Aiken: Q. When did yon commence boarding with Mrs. Suratt I A. The flth of October ls«t. Q How long did you-board there? A. Until the time I-was arrested, alter the assassination. Q, When did yon first meet at Mrs. Suratt’s houte tbe prisoner Payne 1 a. Ido not know what most!; II met hlmdnrlog the winter; I first saw him at breakfast. Q. How many times did you meet him? Ail only saw him there twice. Q. When was the last time. A. In Maroh. Q. How long old he stay at that time ? A. Ido not know; retorted to Baltimore the next morning alter he came. Q How long did you stay-in Baltimore? A. A week. Q. Was Payne gone when you relumed? A. Yes. Q. Do yon enow tbe prisoner, Atzerott? A. I do. Q. When did he first come to Mrs. Suratt’a ? A. I do not know the day of tbe month. Q- How long did he stay there ?' A. Only a Short time. Q Canyon state under what olrcuthstanoes he left? A. Ido not know under wbat olroumßtances; 1 believe Mrs. Suiatt sent him away: Q. Are you awaTe of his geutbg drunk In the home and making a disturbance? A. lam not; ( heard he had bottles up there, but I didn’t know anything about bis getting drunk. Q What room did you r-eeopv in the houße? A. I f-lept In tbe same room with Mrs, Suratt and her d&ugh’er Anna. Q. Wbb there a photograph of Booth Tn that room ? A 'Yes, sir. Q, W»s It yours ? A. No. q. Have you ever seen that picture, u Night and Morning ?” A. Yes. Q. Was that yours 1 A. No; that belonged to Mrs. Surratt’s daughter. Q. Do you know anything about Booth’s picture being placed behind that? A. No. Q. I>id yen own many of tbe photographs In the house ? A. Not many ; I owned some In the al bums. Q.. Were there photographs of Union Generals tn the house ? A. I saw one of McClellan, I think. Q.. Did yon, while you were In the hoa-ie. know s&yDipg of defective eyesight on the part of Mrs, Suratt? A. I know she could not read orsowat night on account of her eyesight. Q. Are you acquainted with Louis J. Welch mans 1 A. Yea. Q. Was he treated In the house like a friend ? A. He was treated more like & son. Q When did you last Bee Booth there? A. The Monday before the assassination. Q When did you last see John Saratt 1 A. The night that he left the hoaee, two weeks before the assassination. Q, Did you see him anywhere In the city daring tbr-se two weeks? A. No. Q, Did you ever buy any photographs of Booth, or give one to Miss Anna Suratt? A. I bought one, and she bought one herself. Q. Have yeu ever known Mrs. Saratt' to be un able to recognize persons of her acquaintance in the street? A. I remember her passing Mrs. Kirby in the street once without recognizing her; she did not see her at ail. Q. Was Mrs, Kirby on the same side of the street with her ? A. Y*s, sir. Cross-essmined by Judge Holt: Q. Did you ever know Mrs. Suratt to have any difficulty tn recogni zing her friends In the parlor bj gaslight; did she alwaye reoognize you ? A. »he did. Q, You speak of owning some of these photo graphs ; did \ou own the photographs of Stephens, Davis, and Beauregard? A. No, sir, they did not belong to me, George H. Calvert was next called as a witness for the defence, and questioned in reference to a letter written by him to Mrs. Snratt, on the 12th of April lesr; but, the letter Itself not being in court, his examination was postponed until the lector ooula be produced. Testimony of B. F. Gwynn. By Mr. Alk Iff*. Q. Where do you reßldol A, In Prince George county, Maryland, near Sorites- Till®. Q. Are yon acquainted with the prisoner, Mrs Suratt ? A. Yes; I have been acquainted with her seven or eight years. Qi. Were you present at her house in SurattsvUi© In April last ? A. I was the day of the murder of the President; I came from Marlboro, and met her there : while I was passing in the carriage Mrs. Suratt said she wanted to see me, and I Stopped to Seeker. Q. Have yon been in the habit of transacting business for her ? A. Yes; I have transacted some bm isees for her; I sold soma land for her. Q> Did you transact any business for her that day? A. No; she gave a letter to me to give to Mr. Nortbe. Q. Were you present at the house when Mr. Lloyd returned ? A. No, sir. Q. Are you acquainted with John M. Lloyd ? A. Ism. Q. Did you meet him that day? A. I did,at Marlboro. Q. What time In the afternoon of the 14th did you see him ? A. At about 4or 4% ; I parted with him on the road; I did cot see him afterwards. q. What was fils condition at the time T A. He had been drinking right smartly. Q. Dlu he seem to be considerably lntoxloated? A. I could hardly tell that; he acted like a man wto had been drinking some. . Q. Had yon a personal knowledge of Mr- Northe’a buying land or Mrs. Suratt? I had of his baying Jsnd oi her husband. Q. Did you know personally that she was there that day on that business? A. Not except by the letter. Q. Was Mr. Lloyd present at the time Mrs. Su rati handed yon that letter ? A. No, sir. Q. Did you see him again that afternoon ? A. I did not. Cross-examined by Judge Holt: Q. Did you have any conversation with Mr. Lloyd that afeemoan? A. Yes, I tbink I did; saw him three or four times that day at Marlboro. Q. I mean at home 1 A. I did not see him after he got home. By the oourfc: Q. How fftT Is It where you parted with him on the road to Surattsville? A. About five miles. Mr. Aiken: Q, Yon received the letter? A. Yes, and read It; tbe direction on the outside was to read H and deliver It to Mr. Nor the. Testimony of €apt. George Cottingbam.. By Mr. Aiken: Q. What Is your business ? A.. Special Officer in Major O’Beirne’a board of enrol ment. Q. Were you engaged In making any arrests of parties alter the assassination? A. I was. Q. Did you arrest John M. Lloyd? A*. No, Sir j. my partner, who was with me, arrested him. Q. Did you see him after he was arrested? A, I did; he was put into my care at the,.pose offioe at Surattsville. Q. What Information did Lloyd give you at that time ? A. He dented knowing anything about, it, and for two days continued to deny it; X finally told him that I was satisfied he knew, about it; thatshe had it on hla mind, and the sooner he got rtd.ot It the better; he said, »* O, my God, If I should make a confession they would murder me!" said I, *• Who would murder youl” he Bald these parties- in the conspiracy; 1 told him that If he w&b going to free himeoHby telliug on these parties to get out of it, tbatwas hla business, not mine ; .! then put him in the guard«house; he seemed to be much ex cited ; the lieutenant went to Washington; for rein forcements ; Mr. Lloyd thou stated to mu that Mrs. Suratt had come down to his place on Friday, be tween four and five o’clock; that she told him to have the firearms ready ; that two man would oall lor them at twelve o?wock? that two. men did call; that Harold dismounted from, his horse, and went Into Mrs. Suratt’s, or rather Lloyd’s tavern, and said: “I have something to tell youthat Harold then told him to go up and ret tbose fire arms $ that the fire-arms were brought down, and Harold took onethat Booth’s oaroloe waß oar rled to him, whether, by Harold or Lloyd I do not remember, but that Booth said he could not carry a carbine; It was as much as he could do to carry himself; that his leg was broken; that Booth said we have znuraered the President, and that Harold said we have picked cfl Seward j I asked Lloyd why he did not state these facts in the first £ lace, and not allow these parties to escape; that e at least eould have spoken about the fire-arms being in the house. Q. What Information did he give you about fire* arms ? A. I was In the house when he came In from Bry&ntown, and commenced crying out and hammering, “ Oh, Mrs. Suratt, that vile woman, she has ruined mel said to him, “ You stated there were two carbines, and that Booth coaid not cany hlB; where Is that carbine?’’ he told me it was up stairs ; that Mrs. Suratt had some bags over it; I went up but could not find it; I told them I would cut up tbe house before I would go away without it; with that he told the hired man to get an axe: I did not go Into the room where he went until I heard three knocks on the wall, and then went in, and after about the seventh blow l saw the carbine ; It had been suspended by a string above the plaeterlDg; the string seemed to have broken and it had fallen down. q,. You did not find the carbine where he told yon it was ? A. No 5 1 hunted for it but could not find It. . . Q, During these two days when Mrs. Floyd was denying all knowledge of these parties did be men tion the name ? of Mrs. Surattf A. Not while he was denying it; after he confessed he mentioned her name. 4. 'who was present besides yourself at the time Mr. Floyd mace this statement to you? A. No body, that 1 know, except that Mr. Jenkins, a *ro ther of Mrs. Suratt, was up in the room when I said I knew that Mr. Floyd guilty ?hat my mind was made up $ I knew tuac he was In the conspiracy; there iaa been blockade-runners ar retted at hfs btuse; his house was a headquarters for rebels and blockade-runners during Floyd’s occupation of It, , „ A d Did he ever make any farther statement ? A. Yes, sir. 0. What was that statement? Question objected to by Mr. Brlnguam, and Ob jection sustained by the court. d. Do you recollect positively that Mr. Floyd used tbe word “fire-arms 1” A. Ido. 0. Did he tell yon Mrs. Suratt brought them there? A. No; 1 think he said Johnny Soratt brought them there. Q. When did Mr. Floyd state that Mrs. Suratt made that remark about the flre-armß 1 A. It was on Friday, between four and five o’olook. Q. Did he have the appearance at that time or being very much frightened? A- Oh,no; he was not afraid; everything he said was volantary; I advised him, when 1 sent him down to Colonel Wei Jes, to make a dean breast of it. Q. What day of the week did he make this con fession to you ? A. I think it was on Tuesday or Wednesday; I wIU not be positive; my business was to prepare the way for other officers over me. Q,. Dldhesay anithlDgat that time about Mrs. Suratt getting him into difficulty 1 A. Yes, he did j De cried, and drew his hands over his wife’s neck, and bowlrd for Ms prayer-book; Mr. Floyd’s wife and Mrs. Oflut were there, and heard all the conversa tion Jn that room 5 1 told them to brace up. Crosß examined by Judge Holt: (1. state whether, at the time, Mr. Floyd mentioned the rea sons why he had concealed his knowledge of this matter 1 A. H» said to was afraid of parties there: to was afraid If he made this oonleßSlon they would murder him. Q. Who did you understand him to refer to ? A* To these engaged In his conspiracy. Q. What was the precise language housed In re ference to Mrs. Suratt? A. It waß “Mm*—tt; that vile woman ; she has ruined me ; lam to oe shot, lam to bo shothe meant by that, I sup pose, that his guilt was so great there was no hope for him. Be-FxsmlDßiion of B. J. Early, [Former . wltnesß for the prosecution, but now oummened for the defence.] Q. You stated in your first examination that you came down to Baltimore on Thursday afternoon, lu company with O’Laughlln, Oapt. Henderson, and Mr. Murphy ; will you state ou wnat train you osmei A. On the half-past three o’clock train, I uf lleve Q. What time did you reaoU Washing ton I A. At the nenal time; I believe tt takes two hoars. Q,. Did yon oome os the accommodation train 1 A. I don’t know what train tt was; I think wo «sobed here about half-past five o’olook. ft. Now I wish ,00 would stats, sir, where yon and O’JbnvghUn went to When yott left tn, OHSi and FOUR CENTS. every platfe yon were present with Mmi a.. After lcavu ft the can w© made oar wav to the A.VfI’IQO t n Lichens’or Be! linen's Hotel j I thlok we weal Id side there sod os mo out ; HeuriefsoQ wen: into a barber’s shop to get shaved; QTiaugHllD tfeep ashed me to go with him to the National Hotel; when we got there he wont to the desk, tell leg me to wait and he would detain me oul? a few mooeots; I went as far as the door; be left m* standlr-g there, and came beck again in three tw five miriutes, and after tfrat we went bask to Lfchans 1 , and thezrse up the Avenoe. Q., liid you take any fuppe7 there 7 K, No, sir; we went as far as Eleventh street, and turned back and went to WektrW dlnlng-ffalooa, over Wartl A Stevens*. 1 tbfik. €£ Hid jou take supper there? A. Yes, sir. . tffc. How long did tbsh last? &• I guess about tbrefrqtrartew of an boor. Q., W het time did you faav® thOrCl A. Absut 8 o'clock, or 7%. l should gw?;-after oonaiugout oi tberewe returned to Full man’s, and proceeded to rhe comer 'Third street where G*ft*oghlln and Murphy left me atfdj Bendeuon saying tb*-y were goleg ro see Mr. Boinnss, a Fisk mao, cod would see u*aq tb» corner again ;• they returned. aaeoxopanied by Daniel L« ckrtn- end at ter tbattbe five of us started up the avcsus lossstbel lcmii’»t ? on; Mb. Lookrantraatad a* to to as far aodhe Tre&enrr, as far a« toe public r»a»r ration, above Seventh street, when? ' ii«y w*-r* flnl*hlo* the first piece; w* r ms in Mi there till about ten o'clock, on at the time , and stopp-td an i ep the avenue again, and went into the Metropolitan, and remained there till after one o’e c-fk; wh tben went out for fire minute*, came bark, and went to bed. Q, Was O’Lo-uhun with ycuaUthat night? A Yet, sir. ft. Bo you know where Secretary Stanton's house Ut A. Ho. air Q. Bo you know'where Willard’s Hotel Is? A. Yes, Sir. Q Bow. Stanton's house Is, more than rix squ«r«e mrih of Willard'r, I could have been there between' 9 and U O’clock? A, 80, sir. (Objected ft .) ' Q. Bvw, sir, yon afated that on Friday you woke hi m ai ibe hotel, and that he was with yon most of Friday? a. F*s, sir. ft Will you explain again where he was till bad time or Friday right? A i was only with him fro ed of ravy-yara men? a. Tea, sir. Q Where didyou go from there? A We returned to Buliman’s. Q, Bow long did be stay there? A. Te&n’t»ayez ac'ly; 1 r«c< li»c Qiet]o«tly b's going with Fufter, bat 1 dov'iiacolieot wnether it was before or after ihe pro* ceasit n paestd. Q Bo you know he was dressed on Friday ere n'ng? A. Ves, rir; he had a coat similar—lt was ju*t like a frock coat behind. Q Look at that coa (pointing to the prisoner); Is that the same? A ’tea sir. Q is that the h tine pants? A. Yes, sir. Q Bid you ms»e ? Yes.' sir. Q What »on of a vest had he? A It was of the same material ns the panialoors Q What color? A Well, a sort of plsfd, only it is smprd up and down; a kind of pnrpjeaad green Crocs examination by Jndg3 H It; Q Btate whether or not you Wrte under tne irfiue&os of llqaor tnat n‘*ht? A W*li, ye*, tflwa del'lo’ciock Q tiOW often did joa drink before t n o’clock. A I could not say how many times X drank; we drauk pr«ft!» eonfiderabie . , CL £iiht times; ten times? A I think we m’ght have ofAKk as often as that, but It w*b mostly ale; 1 sever saw O'Laughiin drink any liqaor. Q Tr u were no; tepars>d from him at all on Friday evening ? A. Aot till the time he went oat of tne hence. Q What time was tl at ? Tea o'clock, or a little after. . ... .. . . Q Wheu did yen tee him again ? A On Saturday m-rule*. Q. W here did he leave you ? A. At 10 o'clock on Fri day nlgtt, at tiallman's Hotel. Q. Whereirthat? A. BwtweeuThirdaudFour*and a ba f c’rtets. the Becord doorfiom toe G‘obp. olfl ie, Q. Djdhegooutthen? A. Yes, sir; with Mr Pallor. BytheCcuit; Q Bow long were yon at the dials* table on Thursday ? A From three quartors of an hour to an hour: we bad tos.ay thereumii the dinners were got ready for tl e funr of os Q. Wis there considerable wine drank there that afUruooit? a Po, *ir ; we had no wine. By Mr. Oox*-: Q Bo you recoliC'Ct whatitimvU was whm you Kft the Canterbury on Thursday night? A. It was after (he d&nve , ... _ . Q. Have you known him long? For tie last five years, and for ;he last ten mouth* more esseciaUy. Ttstimony of Mr. Jfturpby, Q. Where old you reside? A In Baltimore, sir. Q. Bid you come to Washington on Thursday, April 13th ? A. T es, sir. Q. In w>at c mpany ? A With O'Laughiin, Hen* derton, and harly Q. Wbo proposed the trip? A Becderson. Q. What time did you get to Washington 1 A About 6 o'clock Q Will you »tat« aU that place all th&tevenlog? A. We came from the depot down to itaiiiu-n'* »ad theietookadunkortwo; «e started from there and west t < the aisuoiolitaa. aud went to several pise?*; ws 'ock supper at Walker's about 8 o’cioet; It might hsv* fa«Mt about half past 7. Q ar.vsiong were jonoccupied there? A It might have been ehom half an brur. Q. Bid supper have to be prepared ? A Y if t a crick, and I think that brought us to half*p*st 2 o’clock, and then we went to bed. Cb Bid 1 rrodeittacd you to fifty that O’LatLfhlln w*» w,uii you fall that time ? A. Yes. *ir» &U that day ; oiu he weal with Early arid left as about fire minute*, aad w.eat to the PaiioD&i Hotel; that was while Henderson wm getting shaved; 1 didn't to, but waited till they came back ft Do you know where Secretary Stanton'* hotueift? A. Y*b» elr. Q Stale vrfcaihtr O'Laagltlin was there that night 7 A ffoaeutru an the corner of tUnth&nd Penn»yirt» nia Avenue. ft. Did von see him . At what time did yon go is there? A. At about hfclf past 9 ©’dock, 1 suppose. Q how long did yon stay ? A, Till tea, or a quarter after. Q. Where did yon go from there? A. To the Metro* polltax. Q And from there? A To Rnllmau’s hotel. Q vbattim« d>d yon reach there? A. Probably at half past tea o’clock. Q. 1 will ssk yon whether the aconsed was with yon from the time you joined them till the time yon went to Bnllman’s hotel? A Tee, sir. • Q Bo yon know whore Secretary Stantons* house Is ? A. 80, nr* ' „ Q Bo yon know where Frasklin Square is? A, Tes, a. the accused hare been there during that time? A. No. Hr. • Q Bid anyfaodT join yon at Bnllman’4hotel? A, Yes, Hr: Mr. Eolette, ~ iV . v Q How late weio yon with them? A. Till after 12 o’clock Q. Was O’Langhlin with yon all that time? A. No, Q. Bid you sleep In the same home with them? A. q* Bid yon see them next day ? A, No, sir./ A Were yon with them the next evening? A. Yes, sir. between 7 and 8 o’clock at the afetropolitsn hotel q, were yon with them aay time o arias tae eve nini? A. Ye*, till half pa*t 9or a quarter past. q. Bid they go to Walker’s wh*u you w**re there? A. Not that 1 im »w«r« of; l he* rd them speak of going to ftt pper; 1 don’t kaow wneiher ih«>y did or not q. Bi where we were first and went into the other seats juet behind the all alttog.th.rf A Two of us sat to e.m.r and the rest ilstt bshlndlus. Q lon saw the wooie part, all the thus you wore In tkehoube? A. res sir . _ • ' . Q. h one left till all left?, A, We all left together. By Mr Coxe- £. Whatiwas o»Laugh*tn*« manner; didheseim excited? A He appeared very lively, and made the remark that th*y hsd come from Baltimore to seeUeUlumitation and haveag-ioi tima q Was he intoxicated ? A. 1 don’t think he wus; he was lively nno merry Ilk*. Testimony of Mr. Rolette* Q What ie your business? A. I am solicitor for a New York cracker bakery. n _ , Q Bo yon know the accured? Yrs. sir Q. How long have yon known him? A, In the neishhorhood of two years. q Did you see him on the evening of the 19th of April? A. Tee* »u ? ,‘en and hair-past tsn o’clock 1 had men to the l apltol with a lady, a«d whirs I hatred bark 1 saw him on the steps or Ball nann’s Hotel, ...... Q. stetp whether yon Joined that party afterwards. A a ¥ Bowlo«g were you with them that evening ? A Till about 12 o'clock Q Did yon see him the next day? A. Yei, sir; on FTlday morning, and I was with the whole party oc Friday night nati- betwrcueleven and twelve o'clock. Q Where .were yon when yon received the news or the Fiesidenf a assassination? a. At Bullmaa’a Hotel. Q Was O'Langhlln there? A Ye«»lr . Q Bo yon know an*tblog of hU going »w from the hotel that night? a. Be end Falier went ouraome* time alter the news was recslvsd of the Frealdent betag Q. Bid you notice hi* bshavlor wb;u he beard the news of the President’s assassination. ? A. 1 did not, %. Do yen- know bow be was dressed ? A. He had on a pair of Scotch plaid pacts and vest. TeMlmony of Mr. Partly. §• Bm°euperluUndeßl 0 , ipHl , A**! £SUSSIi fc K'fifiSS -S*. “11' herlr v A At mV reelauraut. S' *A Abou* li.ltpa.tten o'clock, o' How W0«0Hl they «•»’ l A. Till about twelve, o Were they there a'l that ttrae ? A.l doat kuowi T wai a!liouudt»thekltcteu and other pieces; 1 oloced afc a n Wer’they'hire when you oloced? A. Tec. air. q WasO’li.aKhUn^ltllthem? A* XBB TAB FBBH^ (PUBLISHKIi WSEKLT. Tin Wax run «1U *» *• mb«rlb«n tv Mil (pw mu t» **■ *• ltll J Wl W Club, thaa Tan vrlll Bt thaaaa* rAU. ||, od p.f copy. The money mu,( alwaj/i aceomyonv (he oeder . and in no instance cm llute terms he AtvUtCed/rom, at they afenl very Mute mors them Os sett of ptiper. A»-FoBtmaat«rß an ragMM to aot bb m*U* ** Tbi Was Pbbbs. to- To tha ,Btt»r-Tij> of tha CInO of ton or twutrf M extra oopj at the paper will ba ten. Q Ton knoar him wall? A. I ban too tea him *>*7 on** o’c ock .. „ m Y«« ol* C? bid the entire party rotboa ? A . . im-,7i: U v», O V..n fl/vvnn IrcVa* Cfe OWn IttOi AUIUf Bytkec'Ui. ■ w »cu s*y you ihivb th»*iUv? a three miathat baa be been much aoo*t J’.o/.L! Be Wfl*} be d. wn tw.. «, times I wcoldn't see bim for two nrthrev t . Q ltd he alwaV" *Uy atvottrbonier , \ By Mr. Core; (X Look it is tbs sum* be w‘o r fl that nlglit, A f 9kL ik It II • i oidn’tpar iqch ctiebOion to bis dress. Vsstimoiiy of Mr. Vnlirr. Q, Boyonrtsideln thd'dltv ? A, T**a. stlf. Cl I)oyouknowtbeacvtt*ed? A Ye»i SIF. •. Q Bow long have y«tp known h'do? A wfitweiir tu ♦•??<» and fourtefc yesrs .. Q. Didyousev kimoneUiforThurßdvyof Fritigy, tha iSrh and Mth of 4pni ? a. I saw* him on* FHd*T* tttV Q.* Where ? A. At Bull test's. Q What rime of day? B«twesu sei**n and alghfe o*> lock >n t!i*> evening. Gf Bid jouseeblin : attylaterr A. Yes, rtf; bylUFdWi te* and *?evev, CL Bowneartsn? 4; I can’t scy exactly iweOt ten and eleven- . , _ Q. rid you receive tLxusws of the Freside&t's'kMag-i* sh Irion (h'et nUbt? A, Yes. rir. M bn you know wkeiw be was rotween eiiht a&4 I*n o'ricei T A I dO'liOtj*-ssf . a, Wbat W«» his conou«y when he the.lgltf off tbs t A He Moksd a ustf, Q. 2rd he shawaor right? A «- . • Q. Bid he say anything cHowt Bioih? K Ho, gjf. <;roH»f>x»B»9&tton toy Jntg*. Hoii; H Did h 4., rw bi me Tilth you ? A Yes. sU’Jhe u*-ed teb/ten gelwml with xo*r ft- BiOdulnvSle him to wltkyauf A V did, sir. . By Mr. 00£1 ft; Bid ho ever reside in Washlngtcu-7 A. Y*>*. sir. ft I * his brother in business here ? A. Yes. rir. Test f tjjiiiy of captal c' Col n > ru pur to mo ; be wanted to pick it out of me»* and I»idti'c think I wai boand to teri dim J . O Bid I a*>k yon 1f Mr/ L ord said anytfcifegln refe rrnce to flrsßTms? a. Yon ached me if Loyd bad p.ede a «onf«**i &to me,’a* d 1 said vs*, aoi yon said 1 wbatwas It? and 1 declined aatweriug bdtl said £ would answer any question von would ask. Q. what did you tell me this sfternoon? A. 1 told you »)ie; you were tryiucr to ptok oitof on and f n.ld you ttat yoaio aht call melotoG»urt an&l would s*a « whatl had toidyou, a Ire Aud now at&to ihatX' did do it. Testimony 'oflt Noriodi ft. Bid you *ea o'Litughlln la Baltimore os fiumdayr nlaH? A. Yes, sir. ft Da you an* w v hether he had bees i&formsY that' r n officer had been In searen of bim?r A, That It what h^Uddme. Q Did he sav he was going to glvd elmself upt A Its, rir; h» raid he would os IfOjt*UVjjjttifMug. TesilmokyefClceMv^^llpwit.' Q. Wberedo you retim ? A In Q. Bav-- you been in the habit of Mrifif 1 tIASWIo- s oi leaders of the rebellion exposed tfH-,sterey and Matamoros will also be fortified. A oomp of observation la to he established at the former plaoe. The famous Jeoker affair has been finally settled. Conut fie Horny and other high officials agree to pay six million llanos, one million annually. SUEHCH VEBSIOK OF THE BTOKY. Oaibo, May M.—lSEstaJette, the French paper publielied In the olty of Mexico, rays tbe emigrants lately, from tbe United States have returned, being unable to find land or labor to support them. Tbe same paper says the American neyrs causes a profound sensation in Mexico. It favors o florins advantages to Southern emlgratlou as tbe. only meatus of stemming tbe torrent wblob threaten, to overn helm mat OOtmtry, US the Southerners, know how to defend tbe soil they may possess. Another paper says the condition of Mexloo oo> copies the serious attention of the French Govern: ment, and the Emperor has said he is resolved to sustain her honor,and thereon establish the French flag, at the cost, If necessary, oPFrenoh blood. Speaking of the probable Intervention of th« United States, it says: Three European'nations, atleast, France, Austria, and Belgium, are bound to sustain the Empire—a conflict the United Stated, will not provoke. Maximilian will visit Jalap*, and Vera OtKZ. SOUTH AMERICA, Store or tbe usnnl Bickerings, *uarrela, and Bevolntloue. New Yobk, May 26,—The Panama Star,and He rald or the loth lust,, reoolved by the arrlval'of tha Ariel, has the lollowing; The contract for carrying the malls between Eng. land, New Zealand, and Australia, via Panama, has been finally arranged. The death of President Carrera has had a serious effect on the minds of tha citizens of Guatemala, and trouble was anticipated. Gen. Ocrrta bad been ohosen his successor. Uneasiness was felt In Salvador by the signs of an attempt, by tbe friends of Gen.. Barrios, to oven, throw tbe Administration. Trade and agilcuUnrO are In a flourishing condition. Tbe revolutionary uprising In Olanoho, Hondo* ras, had not been quelled. There Is nothing of Importance from Nicaragua or Costa Riea. xt is now certain that Spain has made olalms on Chill. How they wore to be settled w*s.not dotep. mined. ' The tronbles in the Bmils continue. Flore* I* threatening Paraguay. , , ' The revolution In Peru continues, and Is spread lug, tut thtre appears to be but little OOQoentratloN In Its management. WEST INDIES. Indigusilon over tbe Harder of oar Presldenl-Besptot to m« memory, NEW Yohk, May 25.-The brig EtIWW St*r brings advices from Barbadoos to the lßtb Inet. An Intense feeling of sorrow and Indignation wa* caused at Bridgetown on the annouDOsmant of tho late PiesWent's assassination, and letters of aonoo, lenoe wore received by the American consul from the offlolals. Tbegnnboat Steady Bred mlnuUguns, and the flags of allthe shipping In port were die. played at balMuaet. The offloe of the American consul was draped In mourning. Arrival from Europe. qubbeo, May st.—The steamship Moravian, from Liverpool on tbe Uth, via Londonderry on the 12th Inst., has arrived hem. She passed Cape Race on Snnday morning, th* 2ut lnst, and landed her despatches, but owing te the heavy storms beyond Halifax the telegraph lln* has not been In working order. Her advices have boon anticipated by the anITM of the steamer China at Halifax, Cincinnati Harfceta, Hay 85. Flour firmer 1 sales of SA o bbls of extra to tt* Government al 16.40. Whisky very d*W- v*> ylalonfl «uU,