E4t Vress. WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1863 Mr. Justice Woodward and the Evidence of His Disloyalty. Far better had it been for Mr. Justice WOODWARD had he never written a line du ring this campaign. A man with his resord cannot explain away or extenuate its infa my, and can only appeal to loyal citizens by confession of its guilt and apology. Apo logy he refuses ; instead of confessing he denies—audaciously denies, in the face of his own printed and acknowledged words in defence of the south, in justification of the rebellion, and in opposition to the Union, 'which now, for 'the sake of office, he pretends to uphold., He is convicted by his own words of disloyalty, yet, in his letter to Mr. BIEARELEY, affirms that he, has spent his life in upholding the Constitution. We think that letter unfortunate. Else where we publish a letter with which Mr. LEMUEL TODD has honored- TUE . PRESS, which exposes its petty subterfuge, and should cause Mr. Justice WOODWARD to say, with /ago,. when his crimes are disco vered, ‘!From this time forth I never will speak word." -Yet, let him protest his loyalty, for'the declarations of falsehood are the opportunities' of truth. Thus stands the ease : Mr. Justice WOODWARD states that Mr. TODD, at a pub= lie meeting, said that a certain Judge HALL declared that Mr. Justice WoonwAnn had avowed himself "a believer in the doctrines of secession, and in favor of an immediate recognition of the South. Mr. Justice, WOODWARD affirms that there is no truth in the storY'; that ,he knows no Judge HALL, and cannot remember ever having known a man of that name ; also, that he has always been opposed to secession, and is now in favor of suppressing the rebellion. This affirmation Mr. TODD answers, emphatic illy and conclusively, and his letter places. Mr. Justice WOODWARD in the position of a lum who, to escape an argument, would trust himself to a quibble. Mr. ToDD declares that he never made such a statement ; that he knows no Judge HALL, and, never referred to him as autho rity, and intimates that he is a man of straw, which his, opponent has cleverly set up for the purpose Of, easily knocking down. But he did state, and on .most respectable au thority, that , Mr. Justice WOODWARD "in a conversation with.the Hon. H. B. WRIGHT, had defended the constitutionality of the doctrine of secession, and denied the power and authority-of the General Government to coerce a State into obedience to its obli gations under the Constitutiom" NoW let - Mr. Justice WOODwARD impugn the ve racity of what Mr. TODD did say, the ve racity of Hon. H. B. WRIGHT, for he can, not escape by denying the - existence of an unknown Judge HALL. N. TODD has cited authority for his statement, which his opponent will he bold indeed to question, yet which he must degroy, before he can honorably ask the vote of the humblest of loyal citizens. The sophistry of all the schools cannot now evade the crushing -argument by which. Mr. Justice iiiiroonwAnn is proved unworthy of the high office to which he in vain as pires. It was very easy to refute Mr. SHARP LEY'S false representation of Mr. TODD'S _ statement, but it will be very difficult to meet the statement he really made. The imaginary "Judge HALL" was quickly despatched with a stroke of that pointed pen used so often by Mr. Justice WOOD WARD rto write of the blessings of slavery and the evils of the Government; but all the disloyal pens in the Commonwealth cannot blot Mr. WRIGIIT from existence. The accusation Mr. Justice WOODWARD re pelled comes back to him with ten-fold force, strengthened by new names,. and more stattliiig citations from his own dis loyal utterance. Mr. TODD not only quotes Mr. Wmoiri,' but shows that the distin- guished Jude waS shocke.d at Mr. Justice WOODiNVARD'S opinions of secession, and that - Judge LORIN, knowing him inti mately, had characterized him as a - disciple of the extreme CAIAIGIIN school. The CaLriorm . 'school ! What is that ? The school in whieh. JEFFICRSON DAVIS studied open treaEon TALLANDIGICAM secret treach eiy, and in which Mr. Justice WooDwARD has shown himself a scholar of unenviable From the evidence in his possession,. Mr. TODD had an unquestionable right to argue that GEORGE W. WoonwAßu is, or- was until the few weeks before the election, a Secessionist. From the Democratic candi date for the Governorship denial can no longer be received ; he is proved to be guilty, and we ask him to show reason why the people should not pass sentence. His letter to Mr. SHARPLEY might as well never have been written, for it clearly has no ap plication to the question, and is in no way a reply to Mr. TODD'S declaration. A plain affirmation that he has avowed himself a believer in the' right of secession is made upon the highest authority, and either he must prove it to be false or submit to the shame of its truth. Mr. Justice. WOODWARD must again address Mr. SHARPLEY ; but, if his second letter is no better than his first, he may well regret a correspondencn which- serves only to in crease-the general distrust of his principles, his professions, and his cause. Mr. Justice Woodward's Syllogism. " Slavery is an incalculable blessing." " Slaveholders have the natural right to use, in the defence of their slave property, any means of protection they possess or can command." Therefore, "Secession can never find an advocate in me, and I am in favor of sup pressing the rebellion." The Slaveholders' Argument. " Slavery is an incalculable blessing." " Slaveholders have the natural right to use, in the defence of, their slave property, any means of protection they possess or - can command." Therefore, "We use the military power we possess, and the" disloyal Northerners we command, and defend our slave property by rebellion." nouns no one has been found foolish enough to suppose that the South would voluntarily abolish slavery, excellent argu ment has shown that, with the suppression of the African slave trade, negro and would certainly be extinguished, and own ership in mulattoes snd octoroon's take its place. Apropoe of this, argument, we find, in the Evening PoBl, the objection of a loyal Texan to give the "right to vote to the free blacks of the South : "Because," said he, " in six months after you give the negroes the right, to vote, half the Democratic poli ticians in the country will go about swear ing that they have negro blood in their veins." A DESPATCH from Norristown, from the Associated Press, says "that the Demo crats expect McCumax to visit the Fair on Thursday to aid in the election of their can didate for Governor." We are afraid that the Norristown reporter- is some credulous Republican, and has been imposed upon, as General MCCLELLAN has certainly too much self-respect to hold the commission of a soldier of the Republic and at the same time endeavor to cause its overthrow. TRH Norristown reporter of the Asso ciated Press telegraphs that Mr. Justice WOODWARD is now in that place attending the State Fair, and that it is said he will speak in the court house on Thursday eve ning. We commend to the Justice the let ter of Mr. 'TODD we print elsewhere. It purports to explain his record on the Union question. •We wish he would explain his explanation. A LEHIGH-COUNTY newspaper proinises to increase the Union vote . 1,500 in the coming canvass. Mr: REED Will be glad to know that Lehigh is doing so much "bet ter." LET EVERY gentleman who entertains the opionion that "to think against slavery is a sin, and to speak against slavery a crime," vote for Tlir. Justice WOODWARD, thus honor the author of the sentiment, Wasyii:N -