■. «WH«a6.4ir s, r •- >IOBTH«iiI AgoH Btreta. GOODSTO BB SOLD TBIB iftoßthfloir•Doqckron^Aff Ali.fLt ' MUfiQUITOEJ AND FLIB3 AS - O <>o 0 AN ABSOBTMSNT Of If hi to Qoodl ■ (|r O-IfeftY—LADIES’. f-KNTT.Io^SVS' POPLIHB, rtwih trrlifr iim| ■ Hqb«. *», at. £*&AY TRAVELLING GOODS. - watortatea* 801 OHKBTWUT BT. abbgb and oegandt robks. PRItJJCU LAWNS AND ORQANDIK9. 1 .AWNS.—Tip-top assortment fast colors fcro.rwl UAW«S —i rick BARKSBB. utMlaTO, ■ fianfMa, !J|pN>S^llAß,BpTBVWSiE,oloths, i KRCSISTIBLjB INDUOBIMNTS Tb 70BPAUD GLUE, jpAjJDTa*nut*ra.Te7*.Craka ry, Aa. .. - - BPAUJIIfS’S PRKPAMD OUT! at>a ail aaak—aiaaaatai, a»4 »o fcwwAoH «a tfwd UhawUfeMtit. ft iaalmraraadyaad a* lotto atlok mtaixt. Tto»taaolo*(*r Miniillt for UnaUa nkt'n -y l —--■* bratoa tnftaa. Itiajaa* tto Mttcla for oow, atoll. aaAotkar uiaatatalriit aa aordaiwitkladieaof ra*»a»a»t aadtaata. niaMalnilift vnfuMiimto uaS ooid. talar ato ■i«aPr toft l» aotatiaa.ato »i:»ttol»a all tto TihtaMa aialitiaaol tkatott »ia»H*>toEr4PHIA-MADE " : ' : GOODS. ->; •MMa* 1 V ALHISRT©. ROBERTS. ■' ,' ' DIALER ' ' \- ", ; :. GRqgEfiiijy&. -' y > % iaitVnifrjßwtte. VOL. 3.—NO. 295. *BWWG MACHINES. w. F. UHLiINGER * CO.’S BBlltli* AND DOUBLE-LOOP STITCH BEWING MACHINES. ,0E %OEMAKEBB. SADDLERS, nc„ No* 698 AHOH STREET. ; Prfe# ef IHDTTLE MACHINE, $BO. MNor.DOUBUC-LOOP BTITOH MACHINE tom fwllVlm -' - - , *o*t ' .Reisat shUhi m- IkeUred for all kind, of u*. P’ MACHINE BILK, OOTTON, NEEDLES. OIL, tts., eoatUaUr on hud. irMin {{ARRIS’ BOUDOIR SEWING MACHINE. W^n^ifLTlMO^ {yHEKTiER WIUSQN SEWING MACHINES. HENEJ COy, A*»», ‘ STREET, SECOND *loo*. ■MMIM, p Hn | M(( m Fur! Its* -• nuuma cniciit STATE N. >. , » CENTRAL BftVAIU, luM, IV JaM-lm A GIBBS' SEWING MA wiL GKNTB’ FURNISHING GOOHB. fW. BOOTT—I*t* of th* flna of Win- J.VV.B.iro.l* remoirnllT wit tb. utmUon.ef M, asaßMiciMte HOUSE-FURNISHING GOODS. gDPXRIOR REFRIGERATORS, Hoot IswroTtd kisda. CHILDRENS’ 0108 AND OAERIAOKS. In Orant Vui.tr. FURNITURE LIFTERS, Tot* «Mhl l» rereUiM Gaireto aa* HMUh. IPITJ JAMYARNALL*S fiOUSX No. I*SS CHESTNUT STREET, Xmm* Irately **«B«tt» thoAmJoayof Ha* Arbi «•** - PAPER-HANGINGS. {K) CLOSE BUSINESS. BASIS, MONTGOMERY, k 00., no. in onraroT nun, NUI ooU *at, tkimtfc tu« Winter oad autl saria*. Ural, : lunmktl - PAPER HANGINGS, motoUwof oroty write* oeaneotoAwiUi tho bufnaa, A* 9REATLY REDUCED. FBIOB3. IMC PRKRC* PAPEXS AT M PEE CENT. BE LOW COST. fanoM vmUnx thotr Nonwo Pomrm.caß *ot (real BARGAINS. IS-tl WATCHES, JEWELRY, Ac. Jts DIAMOND BTIJDS, BINGS, AND ( 5 1,0W1,,> Al “* JleUd Ware <*.«,£ £ - ' 33 North SIXTH Street. ‘NEW YORK ADVERTISEMENTS. BELMONT A 00., .’ BAN KI! RS. . (onto Lotion of CreditWTraVMSHTmuifria la ALL PASTS OP THE WORLD, ' ntoni tbi _ - MESSRS. ROTHSCHILD, MIS, LONDON, rDANKtORT, VISNNA, BA AMO THSIRmRRgs^ONDNNTB |JALL’B PATENT PLATED lOH PITOHS t Kntiielr diffkmt is their nonetraotion from ell other* nil WA* RANTED to till tho ICE LONGER then urfitsher no* in w nt s tonsentar* of mventr de ft—* Fohronheit, The obovo Pitehera will keen the water eoU for Itenus-Smr horn. y A noend and a half of ioo in throe tint* of water will for Mem k»r* and Afty-fre minutes ; while the nune nnaatitr in anordmarr atonenitnhnr.at the tame em it ratam, oalr laeta two hoen anruteen nunatot! - Feneaa ahoald not aonfonad tin— Pitcher* with thdee ataahr told, hat intnlre for HAUiS FATINX. WM. WILSON i'e SON. Bote Aseats (or thtSAftaafftctuieT* B. W. Conwr FIFTH *nd OHJSRJIY Btrefte. ■lU'tf H. HYATT. *•s CHOBOH ALLEY, - Bote and Patentee lor this city Of TH> PATENT PAPER BOX. This Box exeeta all other* for beaety, »tren*Ui, and derabiUty. Sooner is dispensed with in tta matmfao tare, thus «souring the great desideratum of STRONG- CORNERS. W Ordem Boliaited. lelt-tm pURE • OLD “GOVERNMENT JAVA” COFFEE. run BALK BV C. H. MATTSON, ARCH AMD TENTH STREETS. (OAST-STEEL BELLS. TOM CHURCHES. FIRB ALARMS, Ac., non itti ir NAYLOR It CO.. Jef-tf *3O COMMERCE Street, |s, SHOEMAKER & Co. CLASS, PAINTS, OILS AND VARNISHES, Mortheeet Corner FOURTH AND RACK Street*. ■I«A*o WORK’S ODOMIiTHK BAND COM. rtug.esytmcy any dieUaoe jaws over tar foe f|Bols jgmi»>jpii!SeiSH iatsrteirbudswithoutfoe MARTIN * QUAYLVS Mt-lf “^•“'“^ILABKLPHIA. GILATK ROOFING. —JOHN WELCH, •O BtATUi is prepared to pat on any amount of P APIR, PAPER-NOTE, LETTER, DIOR—2OO Tierces Prime Betailin r * JAMKa a%AMA& MACKEREL, SHAD. HERRING, Ao.~ ■ jw ooTatrCheeee, WoWN-Ground Pure - m Z&xtJtetitogFfgsp** brot^. r> EXCURSIONS. §EA BATHING. ATLANTIC. OIXY, NEW JERSEY, h iVo oorihoti luhoiola ora wall fornlihadt MW Ah wellk.pl aothoao ofNowaortorJSMoloool %hllo Ita nvonuoa ondwolha *»«>•**«Mtn brooder thu thorn of onr othor Seo wttntn* vwoo lu tho oountrj, i et '?.• CAMDRN AND ATLANTIC RAIL ROAD loom VINK-STKEKT WHARF, Phllodolohia, |Hlrot?JlA.M.ondtP.M. Rolnrnmi-toooh Full odolahlo ot lA. M. ood T.4J P, M, Foro WI.DO. Round trip ticket., food for throo dopf, tt.se, to Ho putohiwail or tnohoniod ot tho Uokol olßooa only, salt liUt o> or hr oonduMoH. DlatOheo «S mUH. Snndor train loovoa Viqo street at An A. M.i loovoa Atlonlio Ollr ot«N» fot wood a® 4 *M«r, A totaaraph Ohnandathawhololoaothofthorood. JaH-lf COR CAPE MAY tt n , NkW yoßk am tAvi- SilowSiPSffr!t. ST Vorh.leovin* rrom frit Pier odialßA M **' °* p ®***l fMmSafhasoap" s^^ , n o » c, > Wl^( ' !^‘ i * n ' ,0 ! i ” o,nd ' a) --®! s R l S D . it hire extra). a 60 jjart to flew York, Cabin.. aoo lOO si wardeawith of Q(ly, and somotlmea aetUaUV remonirato JWth UB--oVon with tho “We”, by whoso hand this column Is writ—because, they :say,' wo leave many things untold. Ono reader, a vonomblo man wo should Judge from the . an tique aspoct of his “ hand-o’-writo,” (as- the Scoloh Imvo lt,) Is pelpetUrtlly asktngVfor some pofsotukl liirolHlation respecting Vfctoi-; bitlManiiol, King of Sardinia, and afro, he Rtys, about his namesaho, tho other Victor Erma nnel, who rulos over Piedmont, and obtained Lombardy by tho contest in Italy. To our, oortaln knowlodgo, wo have related the Sead-- Ing events of Victor Emmanuel’s life, throe several times-but out reader has Ibrgbtliiii lllotm Another class urgo hs tb give them an arti cle ovsry woek, at loast, lipon AutograriN, containing copies ot rare and Interesting monts nover beloio published, with notfrOY ahd ahocdotoS ot" tlie wi-lteHi. Some bfpt!# lltass of curious pooplo Sometimes honor ud, with a call, coolly doelaro that they havecMhb to pass tho day In looking over onr autographs, and are plowed to bo awfully offended Sthen the only rofreßhhient haVo Itoiil Its iS tUh memorable told shoulder, and an IntlmattaA that we have somo other uso for onr time t® to waste it upon self-invited, curious visiters. Oh, II those people could only see what is jjibw upon this very table—a collection of poetry and proso, written by John Fhllpot Curran,.tfca celebrated Irish orator and patriot, including his epitaph Upon Mrs. Aldworth, Whose libc* rality chiefly educated him \ A lohg poerti of great fotco; a ioVo ditty, in Ihd ihSiii her of lVaileri a satirical opi’tiialamiiim ntarHago ot a very -juvenile clergyman -lit) a somowbiU Ancient mAiil | a prose cssay dl*- bnislng the question, “ Whether Elective Mo narchy is preferable to Hereditary ?” and, hibst curious of all, the entire of tho celebrated (bar ter Song of tho Monks ot the Screw, (whefeef, in tho Life of Curran by his Son, two verses were suppressed,) all these being in the actual bandwriting of Curran, and tho last-mentioned bearing date 17f6, st Which time the great orator had been a iafryeF of Only a loft modus’ staHdibg, haVibg been “ called to the bar” at the Michaelmas Torm, 1776. These very curi ous and highly interesting manuscript* belong to a grand-nephew ;of- Curran’s, no# in this country, tvho—ihaslnltbh &B fee, Iho writer of these linos, edited the Life of. Cnrran a few years ago—has entrusted them to our keeping for a few days, and—be thankful, ye antograph fanciers—has allowed us to give somo account of tbem, with extracts, which wo intend doing some day this very ftreeh; AboUt aUtOgfaphs there has booh A natural curiosity, because A mAh’A, handwriting is, as it Were, A pattOf hiWbelf. Hismindproduced thO thoughts which his hand has put upon paper.; Hero, for example, is a little French book—i an odd volnme of Corneille—which formed part of Napoleon’s cabinet library at St. Hcs lena, and had accompanied him in various of bis campaigns. The binding has been Wornj the. leaves have been soiled by his hands. HiA peh traced that rapid StiraWl on the ily-lerf Vrhich represents the word “ iTapoleon,” and his pencil (for French printing paper, like most American, is unsized, and will nbt Dear inkj) haS-haSUiy Vrrittoil_tho notel running ali around tho margins ot~tho'drama ot <‘TbO Did,” which this ntplumo contains. Tho “ Medea” of the same great dramatist.l* also l 4 the book, but Jfapoleoh app»rt do? Ojgi havf -tblwiwblfiTl—.hw 1- -~BB, at tho close of tho War. Sovoral times, wo havo been asked to write sketchos of Macaulay, Mooro, Byron, Scoti. Disraeli, Palmerston, Louis Napoleon, ami other eminent men-lho persons who thus solici ted us being apparently unaware that wo roally havo written about thorn all, and about others, over and ovor again—so often, that we have often dreaded being scolded lor giving * tiiricu told tale. The public, it appears to us, would bo protty well pleased, in general, if personal sketches and literary articles wero reproduced ovory two or throe years—then, as Coleridge said, « They would bo as good as Manuscript.” Some readers are very literal. For examplu, we wrote an article, somo months ago, entitled, “Wanted, a Subject,” and a friend, at a dis tance, who read it, took it for granted that our imagination or memory had run dry, snd, ma king a great effort, sent us a wholo batch of articles from his own pon—not one of which, from the remarkable illegibility of his hand writing, wo havo yet been able to read, far less publish I : Now and then, wo confess, wo have com menced'aperies of artioles upon a particular subject, and have not got beyond the first of them. Among these, was a series upon the Theatres of London—wo never wett beyond tho first, but, as tho song says, “ There’s a good time coming,” and we shall continue and complete thoso articles, at any rate. Talking of subjects—wo are offon pressed to give Sketches of Life and Manners at Capo May and Atlantic City. But our Correspond ents, it 'seems to us, work these subjects to death. For our own part, wo aro glad that Atlantic City has gone so much ahead this year, and havo every confidence thatsuch land lords as HcKibbin, Benson, Bedloo, and Thayer, have done, and will do, ill in their power to make their guests at homt. The in troduction ol gas into tho leading hotela at Atlantic City Is a great advance. Mention of Atlantic City reminds ns ol rather a smart saying which a wit fired off there,' last week. It is not too mnch to say that Mrs. William Wheatley is tbe prettiest young married lady at Atlantic City, and it is known that she can swim like a Sea-nymph. Our friend said « Surely, Nr. Wheatley is a great monopolist I He has two Naiad Queens at at Arch-street Tkeatro, and another here!” This may not be new, but it certainly Is true. Two female correspondents, writing in tne same precise, formal, and slightly fiouriahing hand whloh we dotost—for it shows no cha racter—remind us that we promised to relate what we know of tho causes of, tbii separation of Byron and his wife, and that we have not exhausted the subject of Newslead Abbey, which the Poet really possessed for a compa ratively brief period. AS to Netmead .Abbey, wo have , already written two ‘artlolefl, one when Colonel Wildmon died, aid the other some ten days ago, when the'Abbey was put up for sale by auction. Since then, we have got some additional facts, which we shall re lato to-morraw, positively shutting up that subject. As to the, other matter, why Lady Byron quarrelled with, deserted, abused, and from her husband, wo can only pro* inise to treat it—some day* Meanwhile, wo only.say that Byron's own account of the separation was fitlly written in tho Autobio* : graphy which ho gave to Thomas Moore, and : that two, or even three copies of these He- Wlrs still exist, and will doubtless bo pub lished one day* The CoriihUi MtigiiZiiib. : The July number, commencing Vol. it., has ifOeohed us from Callender A Co.* It opens with ;the first'of £lr. Thaokoray’s Looturos upon the Four Georges, hlthorto unpublished, light, livoly, and satirical—bht showing a great deal of study 1 and obeervaUoQo* Mr. Trollope’s story of u From* ley ParsonagoV drags its slow longth along, and •has become tedious. Thero is a paper upon Eleo* trlOUy ttnd Iho tileotrib telegraph, in whioh (of ooursB) the priority of application by Mr. Morse in this country is quietly ignorod—just as the Loudon journals are lauding, to tho sevonth heaven, “ the jreceut’Eogllsh disooveryof tho sowing machine,” and aotually giving engravings of that wondrous Inovelty!-. *• Physiological Riddles,”’ probably by 'Mr. Lewee, iadull. Notso, however, the article upon ; William Hogarth, throwing his eight plates of The fRaWs Progress into fth alihost dramatic foritij and treating It With great skill. “ The House that jJohn Built ” Is an essay, lu tho m&nhor o£ Elift/ i upon the East India Company’s House In Leaded !hall street. “Tho Portent,” a tale of horror, Is .oonoludod—rather olUmally. iterc Is a hcAvylsi I paper upon the Adultoratfon of Food. Mr. Thacke* nly givbs another of his i Itoundabont iHxle his not good, ip its quertiloUi eghtlSth, ajjd A iw»;: Vanltas Vanitatum/’ whiphf.*, in ita cpm mpn senso, and truth. Mrs. Browning writer a poem, in her good old vein, (that which ebe dug ioto ero she took to cursing the'United States;) oalcbratfng the invbiitlon of the Panaean Pipes, '.&& Arnold. l’xofcsflor of .at Q«*. upoU th^tteme'of . '■ *? rl' MEN OP OENIUB. Silent, the Lord of the world Eyes from the heavenlr height, Girt'bjr ins far-shining train, Us, who with banners unfurl’d Fight life’s many-ohano’d fight Madly below, in the pl&m. theft saitb the Lord to his oWn i- , “Sbe rb this battle Below? • Tiftmoil of death arid oi birth! Too lopgjet, wejillem groari. ’Haite.anse.yo, and go • Carry my peace upon earth.” Cladly they rise at his call; Gladly they take his command ; Gladly descend to the plain. Alas! How lew of them all- Those willing tervanto-shnll stand In their Master’s presence again I Some in the tumult are lost: Baffled, bewildered, tboy stray* Borne as prisoners draw breath. Others—the bravest—are cross’d, Oathb height of thbir bolU-fdllow’d ftay; ~ Uy HnrdJy, bdrdly shall one Come, with oountenance bright. O'er the cloud-wrapt, perilous plain! His Muter’s errand well done. Safe through the smoke of thought. Back to his AUeter again. lmpoitnut Letter trom New York. movements among PROMINENT DEMOCRATS TO BAR* MONIZB THE PARTY: DEAN RICHMOND, GIRARD HALLOCK, JOHN A. DLK, AND OTHERS—WHAT WE ARB TO FAY ($109,000) FOR FETING THE JAPA NESE—A WINDFALL TO CAPT. TIBLE. [Corr'ejivoil'iienoe of Tke Pfrefca. New TorM, July 14, 18(!0. The Tribune of this daoriiing ailUdes to a private meeting of several prominont members of the De moeratio party, held last evening, but omits tho names of some of tho prominent persons present, and is silent as to what was done. It was not in tended that the proceedings should be made public. There wero those present who represented the in terests of the rival aspirants for the Presidency— oa one sido&ean Hidhttlond, Elijah Parity, Win; J). kennedjr, and Ather men; on thl other, ’John A. Ulit and Girard Hallocs, 8f thl J&trnal of CoihthtYcc* The proceedings were in formal and conversational, tho object being t& h&ri monize matten,* so as to ..place in the *f)sid a slaglo Benjagratlo electoral and State ticket; I-TsppfeUehtP thal General I)ix xsf/as yet, un decided as to what course he shall pursue in tho contest. Should he determine to sustain the regular nomination, as Tammany has done, (Gen. D.,fs A (he Administration dare -cotTemoteJlm for So"3mt, 6 , # a hit tio much personal ana pclltwal position for tnenrr **uL be. instead of havisgbeeir mado at hiaown desire, was absented only at the urgent solicitation of tho President. Mr. Hallook, of the Journal 'of Commerce, Is a gentleman who, like Mr. Richmond, is not only superior to any enticements of office, but is entirely beyond undue influences from offioial quarters. Ho is undoubt edly actuated by a sincere wish to so harmonize the party as to,insure its asoondenoy in November. The Journal inclines to Brechinriugo, but is not do iHr edihmitted as to preveht A cofdlal sdp 2 port of Douglas tho moment it perceives ho can carry the titate. . .Mr. Rlohmond, with tho sagacity, directness, and boldness characteristic of the man, gave the gen. Ucmen present distinctly to understand what his position was and would be, and whore stood the masses. Ho told thorn that if the Administration woe determined to defeat the Democratic parry it might possibly be able to do so; that the Breck. Inridge ticket would, oi course, get some votes in this mty and along the Hudson; but that the Do* mooratio party and tho Democratic organization would elsewhere in tho 6tato march in solid co lumn for Douglas. After two hours passed in inter changing staffs, the gontlemen went thoir respect ive ways, without coming to any understanding as to what should bedone. Another meeting is proba b!o Tho bills for cnlortatning the jßpsnose have nil boon presented to the joint committee of the Conn ell, and foot up the portly sum of $125,000. They have been audited at $lOO,OOO, and at that figure will be presented to the Counoil. Hubert L. viele, Esq., late engineer-in-chlof of the Central Park, uomes in for $30,000 of the estate of his fatber-ln-iaw, Qeorgo Griffin, who diod a short time since. Mr. S. P. Bntterworlh leaves for Europe to day, E* the Adriatio, to be absent until September. PERSONAL. —lt is said that Marzlni accompanied Madame Mario in disguiso to Sicily, in the steamor Wash ington. —Tho Masonio Grand Lodge of Canada mot at Ottawa, O. W., on Wednesday, and were addressed by the Grand Master. —Capt. Richard F. Burton, whoso journey to Meooa, and whoso Afrionn explorations bare made him so renowned, is travelling in this country. —Gov. Moore, of Alabama, is at the Montgomery White Sulphur Springe, Va , in a very preoarlous condition, having loßt the uso of both arms and legs. —Rich or <1 11. Poudorgast, of Now Orleans, offers a very fioo horse and buggy for sale, prico $760, psyablo when Douglas is elected President of the United States. —Ono of tho recent on dits of London is, that Sir Edward Lytteu Bulwor has become reconciled to his wife, nod that they aro about to livo to* gather again. —lt has been often announced, recently, that thero was now no survivor of the battle of Bunker Uill. Tho Boston Journal corrects this statement. Ralph Faroham, of Aotou, Mo., is stil! living at the age of lOi, hale and hearts. —Mrs. A. Hollins, of Lynonburg, Vn., has re cently givon $ll,OOO to the Hollins Institute, Bo tetourt Springs, wbiob, with her gifts in previous years, and the gift of $5,000 by her husband during his life, makes tho sum of $17,500. —There woro, at lost accounts, 150 visitors at the Roekbridgo Alum Springs, including Gov. Lotohor, Joseph Mayo, and Col. Hardee, U. S. A. The Governor returned to Richmond on Saturday afternoon. There wore 60 at the Grayson Sul phur Springs; 200 at tho Montgomery Whlto; 20 at the Roanoke Red, including fcenator Clay and family, of Alabama; 20 at the Alleghany; 25 at the Yellow. Tub KiefF Suspension Bridge—the greatest of all suspension bridges in extent—over the Dnie per river in Prussia—Charles Vignoles. engineer —was begun Sept. Otb, 1848. and finished Oct. 10th, 1853. Its extreme length is 2,562 feet. Bach of the four principal spans is 440 feet; each of tho two aide openings are 225 feet. There are also drawbridges at eaoh end. The olear water way Is 2,140 feet. The platform of the bridge is 30 feet above the summer level. The greatest depth of the river at the summer level is 40 feet. The height of piers from foundations is 222 feet. The versed sine of chain (not wire oable but a chain of bars) is 30 feet. Baon of the four ohalns is 2,280 feet long; their weight and that of the piers being 1,578 tens. The minimum seotlonai area of the four chains Is 429 square inches. The total weight of iron in the bridge Is 3,500 tons. Of masonry and eonorete, 1,506,009 cubic foot were used in the construction. The total ooßtof the bridge wa552,160,090. $2,160,090. Several accidents have recently occurred lu Boston, says the Traveller , from artificial teeth which were set upon plates. During the inhalation of ether or chloroform, in order to produce insen sibility for the porformanoe of some surgical ope ration, false* teeth have dropped from the palate, and been partially swallowed, remaining in the throat, and causing suffocation until they were feund and removed. People wearing plates, there fore, should always be careful to remove them before breathing any asthetio, for it cannot be ex pected. by ladies especially, that their pbysiolan will ask them if their teeth are artificial. The printers at Pike’s Peak have struck for higher wages. They want $lOO per month, and they have been receiving $76. Day labor at tho peas is from two dollars to three dollars per day. Texas contains more livo-oak than all tho rMfc of the world. TO B. J. HAIDEMAN, Esq., Pennsylvania Member of the Democra tic National Committee, Harrisburg. Toward*, July S, 1860. Sib : I have itr*gg«d my.elf from a oouoh of pain s&d suffering, wita unfeigned reluetanoo, to jarry put a purpose, whieh, If I know mv own heart’ Is prompted solely by a proper sense of self reepeot, »na sincere devotion to principle:’thiii ■K®3" present, i„ this publio form, the at 'P* 81 <”MF«nnsvlv,nt» Demo- Sfai* ®“ th f l^ llon e( Ue Mded upon by the DemoorsUo Stete Ooutrat Ooni -“""t’ f “l h °. rcoentm8 etlng at Philadelphia. My rt. S 4 tha r°? ,ons for lt “re nduressed to you, sir, because it i» for you, under the rules and rssolutions of the National Committee, of which you are the member for this State, to swist, if not ! h ° "tongaXcomplain of. The mnjonty of the Bf»te Oentrel Committeehavo deolded to obtain, if they can, a nlodste from tho itieiHborß of odf Demoeratlo oloptoraf tlekot to vote, in a declared contingency, for Breokinridgo and Lane, respootivoly, as President and Vioo Pre sident. This, in my hnmblo judgment, is s usurpation of power, alike disorganizing, unautho rized, and unjust. It surely cannot be necessary, although it might be pertinent and instruoUvo, that I should re view the wholo proceedings of our last State Conven tion ; nor yet of the'National Convention, whieh met at Charleston, and afterwards completed its duties at Baltimore, in the nomination of Stephen A •JDouglad and Hersdhel V, Johnson, ‘ for the highest offices in (he gift of the Aftterldan people. The exhlbltih’n of a feW leading facts, must bo ample to prove that the proposed eourse of the majority ef the State Central Committee is what I have declared it to be. . The late Stato Convention at Reading assem bled at a period and under circifthiUhees whioh overy’-intemgent Democrat regarded As the most hnuoftl and important that tho. hUlorYofthe par ty evpr,pfMeh;edi XUher within iU membership, or surropndiDg and oounshtllng' lu delioeritions. waa gathered a larger number of threeuifdyi lead you or leveY before witnessed h! jTniliiTi ~ tion. The action of that body, too, in -every re-' was eharaoterised by prodenoe, cooediaiioD, and oofajprwHise; and met with the aiuSost uufyor sai approbation of the Democracy of the State Ex cept in the rejeetloß of Mr. claim to a seat for Philadelphia, and the eeleotlon of certain delegatee to the National Convention, I would not, even now. change the record if I could. A prominent mature of the spirit which prevailed was the disposition to bqry theXecorapton question forever In, the lowest depths, of forgetfulness." It wad utxm this queiHoir—tM« rock of the devil’s own uplifting in the sea g#: politics—that the party had stranded-itself, both in Pennsylvania and in thanV other States throughout the Union. Wo carried tho election of 8 decided majority with the national candidates, end the sound, admirable pl&tfotm of 185$; and* doubled that majority in 1857. Then fallowed the divisions on tne Lecomp ton question in 1858, when we lost the State by a deoisive vote; aud again in 1859. TheDomoora tio State Convention came together at Reading last spriog, determined to be dissevered and disgraced no longer, in regard to quostions which hsa now because the veriest abstractions. In my own Congressional district (if I may take the liberty of BingUng it out In this discussion), a largo majority of ita intelligent Democracy adopted the decision of the Supreme Court of the United dtatei otily 6o fdr ad It tfially went—to wit: that an Afrloan, like Dred Scott, Was ntft a citizen of the United States (which, by the way, our own courts had again and again decided); and, farther,: that Congress bad no right to abrogate slave pro-' perty in the Territories. The vital question, how- ’ ever, whether the peoplo of a Territory, organized 1 for legislative purposes, had not the right, inherent) td otery people, so organised, to regulate by law. all their domestic servi-: tade inclusive—as well as any one of theffl, We; believed, had never boon presented to, dr argued before, and much lees deolded, by that court; and thus we still believe. In regard to tho discussions on tho Lecompton Constitution, in common with the Democracy of the State tfo h&u our own Variously modified opi nions J hilt not doo Word df dlifeApeet toward the Presidont or bis Administration, had been allowed to transpire through the Demooratio press, or in any of our Demooratio Conventions. Silence, for bearance, and where we could, forgetfulness, had been studiously cultivated upon this ntihappy sub*; jeot of At-Reading, our delegates en-' tered earnestly into the prevalent feeling of conoid liatlon and compromise. Baker ana Montgo mery, Bigler and Dawson, received otir votes for delegates at large; and Vaua, Plummer, and Wooaward» for Senatorial electors. The Subject df the Presidency seemed to havq lulled entirely At Rfeadifi*, tthd*r the all-perVadlog spirit of eonQ«8io& and. liberality. The. selection of delegates to the National Convention was confi ded to tno members representing each Congres sional district respectively; so that no marked ex pression of feeling on the Presidential question becamh inanuest In Ihfit Way. An Attempt to no] min&te Breckinridge was made in thd Committee on Resolutions; but, on being objeoted to, it was withdrawn without a vote. Upon .the question of instructing the delegation tovoto asa unit, how ever, (In regard, to to which so much, has been said,l thoro was shown a most clear and palpable repugf pance. A motion tt> this effect was to ted down id the Committee on Resolutiona, 1 and, when agald -*wwgftlfn Convention, a motion to adjourn Anally! was oantfflroon It, anuoarrioax>j I wi£**w*,.jwrf*£{ The oonoluding resolution of the Reading Conven tion, was a strong, unanimous, and pledge to support its own, and the nominees of thp Charleston Convention. I oontend, from alHhat transpired at tho Read ing Convention, thoro was not the slightest manij festation of any radioal objection toward Judge Douglas an a prominent candidate for the Pres if denoy. Not cno word was uttered against him In open Convention; tho resolutions adopted without a dissenting voice, and amid thunders of approval, areolosoly consistent with those adopted by his friends at Charleston, bisewn well-known opinions, and the present national platform of the party Even those of his friends in our Stato, who had openly differed with Mr. Buohanan’B Administra tion upon tho Lecompton question, wero invited and encouraged to fall again Into lino, under the old time-honored standard of tho party, and again march on to & united triumph. How else were we to redeem the State? Prom what quarter brit from those already agroeing with us on most ques tions of publlo policy, wore wo to recruit our de feated ranks ? And yot, what was the oourso pursued by a ma jority of the delogates sent by that Reading Con vention to Charleston 7 Concession and liberality toward Judge Douglas and his friends ! Mani fested in a form Worthy of Persian Satraps- a ty rannical effort on the part of a baro majority to GAG every friend he had on the delegation, by combining the friends of all the other candidates, and insisting tipoh Waiting tho rote of the State as a unit! Prominent and noisy in this aubtimo effort, woro some men, who, but for tho' liberality of the friends of Judge Douglas, would nevor, themselves, have bad a scat in tho Charleston Convention!* Amongthooomplaints of the bolt-, ing gentlemen, is thlsfailnre to gag nearly half tho Pennsylvania delegation. 1 hero emphatically deny that any suoh powor exists in the majority pf any uninstructed delegation, whoro tho delegates have different constituencies, and, of course, equal rights and powers. It cannot bo oetablisncd, either by the law of usage, common sonso, common reason, or oommon justice. Tho rulo of tho Na tional Convention of 1852 has boon roferred te ; but it establishes no suoh prlnoiplo. Let ns examine: it declares, it is true, in a gene ral phrase, that “ tho inannor in which the veto is to be oast, is to bo dooided by each delegation for Itself.” But this had reforonco specially and im mediately to tho fact that tho proportionate num bor of delegates in that Convention w.*3 greatly unequal. Virginia entitled to 15 votos, had 69 de legates nresont, acting and voting. North Caro lina with 10 voles, had 44 delogates; Mississippi with 7 votes, had 39; from Goorgia thoro was a doublo delegation numbering 37; and so on through many other Mates. “Tho manner,” thorelore, “ in which those ” unwieldy deputations “should oast their vote.’’ was well and wisely left to themselves in the first lnatanco. But when tho real prlnoiplo cf representation was put in issue, in the dispute raised by the effort of Governor Floyd, and »• number of others in the Virginia dele gation, to have their individual or distriot votes recorded for Judge Douglas, the Convention de oidod the question upon the true, rational and con oorvatlyo ground—tho deol&rod sense or wish of the poople of tne State sending the delogates. The Convention of 1852 allowed tne whole vote of Virginia to be deolded by a majority of the de legation py* because suoh nad boon the uniform usago in that State, sanctioned by repeated and definite instructions to that effeot, of her State Conventions—nover departed from in ft eioglo in stance. This is undoubtedly the true dootrlne. In regard to tbePennsylvaniadelogatesto Charleston, there was no suoh invariable usage to roly upon, in ascertaining what the people of Pennsylvania desired upon the subject. The practice has been for our Stato Conventions to instruct upon oert&in questions—not to allow the majority of the delegation, without reference to brains or experience, to speak for all. In 1848, in structions were given, I think, in referenoe to the candidate alone. In 1852. the same thing was done; and we voted by districts, or as individuals, upon evory other subject. I remember we divided upon the conflicting claims of Messrs. Lord and Rantoul to represent the second distriot of Massa chusetts ; when Gen. Whitney, (the same whooould not abide the heresies of Judge Douglas In regard to nom-iuteryention, recently at Baltimore,) very pointedly held that Mr, Rantoul’s u private opin ions” on the fugitive-slave law could notaffeot the right of the seoond Massachusetts distriot to be re presented in the National Convention by a delegate of its own oholoe. I remember, too, we divided that year in .regard to the admission of the Cobb and Lumpkin delegation from Georgia ; who Were finally allowed to oome in, although they had not a tithe of the right or regularity of the delegation beaded by Col. Gardiner tho other day at Balti more, which was in a manner rejected by our com mittee. And yet, I supposo Messrs. Cobb anl Lumpkin would at this time hare set down the ad mission of the Gardiner delegation as tittle short of treason. Suoh are the ohanges observable evory day in political Ufe! In 1866 1 was again a delegate; we were then Instructed to vote, xtom first to last, for Mr. Bueh»>" nan as a candidate for the Presidency, in th* Cin cinnati Convention; but upon every we individualized in voting. Wo .iidAO on the New- York oase; here, again, mark what changes transpire on tbo political cneu-boira: Senator Bayard, of Delaware, made a report on the con flicting claims to seats of the two divisions of the New York Demoor&oy—admitting half of eaoh, and requiring a pieties in advance, fr° m both, to support the nominations, of the Convention. Tho Implied obligation resting upon the conscience of ©very true man was insufficient- This ropoyt had the sanction of soma very prominent Southern gen tlemen ; the pledge was insisted upon and given. When the delegations who bad bolted from us a few days slncbat Gharieiton came to us again at Baltimore—Senator Bayard and Mr. Hatch, of Louisiana, who bad united In the Bayard report in 1856, amongst the number—Governor Ohtirch, of Now York;** 1 ? n aturft tiy suggested a pledgo to i abide the action of the Convention, when South ern obivolry sprang loudly and quickly to tho TWO CENTS. rescue; and Hew Tork delegation magna&i momly forbore to insist that Mr. Bayard sod Mr. Hatch should be offered ths nme Cup the, mingled for others in 1856. * With what propriety, then, does Collector Baker purloin and employ in hi. public manifesto, the low bred, pot-house phrase of California bmith, with roforenoe to the rale presented h, the Committee on Organisation allowing nslnetraoted delegates to vote by distriota? One would have supposed that the prompt rebuke administered to Safltli !n open Convention, for having characterised this very just and proper decision of the committee as woolduave prevented even Collector Baber from a deliberate repetition of -the same offensive phraseology. It may be quite presumptu. OUfl v j* a oiti * oa Bke myself thus to eritieise snob distiogaiahed magnates, but I ceunot terbear remarking here that ir there be any defect in the morarconstitutions of the California delegate, and •■Philadelphia Collector, it consists Is some thing quite the opposite of en excessive regard for either courtesy, correctness, or refinement,ln their public discussions. - p How was it a “trick,” in any reepect ? Tho question passed plainly and broadly before the whole Convention; it was resisted with all the zeal and eloquence of Collector Baker’s colleague, the Hon. Josiah Randall. Senator Bigler stood there, and that sharp logician and ready 'casuist, Hon. Henry Phillips too, who could have shown tho impropriety of the rule in our cate, if it bad been in their power to do so; and those Southern gentlemen, who have since had so much to say against this deolsion—why were they dumb in the hour and on the spot when the issue was presented ? we were ready then, as now, to vindicate its jds tideAnd propriety, upon every foot and principle fn the case. There really I* no reason for the heartless clamor, .which has been raised, because a possible majority of the Pennsylvania delegation was not accorded the power to gag others, quite as sound and well instructed upon the questions presented as them selves! - I e*y possible majority, became I never have believed that them was a majority who would have resorted to the odious measure, had the power been yielded to them. In regard to their personal ;»hil*~eos£fl«t thwtoreview non, 1 1 cherish no'pefeono! uakiedneas whatever. It i was, and remains, my candid and deliberate judg ment,. that If the Democracy of tbeoM Jtapsteae had been allowed a fair and faithful Charleston; arid able' especially at Jndge' Douglas would ' r K*re. received twenty, **WoiJ*P* J*t»*M* JPresMemy. In the cam pf New lark, quoted by way of com trasff there wii astlenn and expteAi Instruction given by her full titate Convention; and does any man doubt that Judge Douglas Jitd pot .in his fa? vor, at the same moment, a large'majonty of her Democrat!# voters? Such commentators*as Col* lector.Bakor and Senator Bigler, while-they speak of New York and its united vote, never advert to the Southern votes at Charleston, which were sup pressed hj the unit' role; although then wen nearly, if not quite, as many seeh votes, that would otherwise have boon cast for Judge Douglas, as it is olaimed were suppressed in the New York dele gation. When Senator Bigler and Collector Baker reeur to what was done, and what was designed by the State Convention at Reading, how Is It possible they can overlook the resolutions then adopted, which really an unambiguous and expnsi instruc tions to us all; and to the eleetors nominated, and the members of the State Central Committee as well? We,&sdelegates,bodnorightto»4notioD,by our votes at Charleston or Baltimore, any measure or doctrine inconsistent with the Reading resolu tions so enthusiastically and unanimously adopted. Nor have the electors nominated,by, err .the state Central Committee created under authority of that Convention, any right In any way to disregard its platform of principles. Now, the Reading resolutions declare in favor of non-intervention by Congress on the snbjeet of slavery in the Territories; and they refer ail dis putes upon this point to the courts. The resolu tions supported by Messrs. Baker and Bigler, and their coadjutors at Charleston, and the same upon whi«h the bolters at Baltimore have pledged Breckinridge and Lane, declare in favor of djceofe intervention by Congress or the Federal Govern ment, irrespective or courts or juries. A distinct and positive converse of the Reading and Cincin nati platforms, upon which stand onr .Candidates fairly and regularly nominated—Douglas and. Johnson. And yet, it is gravely proposed to get up a sort of Siamese-twin arrangement, and ran the same electoral tioket, with* license to the electors to do almost anything but their plain and pledged duty. And who undertakes to give. this license F A part of a committee selected .seoondarily by an ap pointee of the State Convention—its chairman, Mr. w elsh! No one esteems this gentleman, person ally, more than I do, or will be more ready to contribute te his rising prominence among’ the young men of Pennsylvania; and I mean no re flection upon his political conduct in any way, ex? 'ceptso far as he may depart from the Reading and Cincinnati platforms inthe presentstruggle, and in the performance of his very worthy and proper appointment. But I must, and do, heartily protest against tho political monstrosity attempted, as I understand, to be carried out by a portion of his appointees, even if it may happen to have his present sanction, which I hope it has not The State Central Committee has no power to pledge the eleotors to any but tho. regular noori ; sees of the regular Democratic National Convex. 1 ticn. Much lea have they a right to adopt, fn any contiaggagy, caadMalee who Save subscribed to the demand of the Dhruslonists of the Couth in rogard to a slave code in the Territories. Neither year constituents nor mine, who approve our action, nor can any in Pennsylvania of the true believers in tho doctrine of non-intervention, yield their sanction, either direotly or indirectly, to this slave code platform, or the candidates which have beon placed upon it by the bolters at Baltimore. Bach a courso at this time, and under oxiating circum stances, would stamp us liars in all tho past, and poor, craven tiok-spitties in the present; and not only lose us the esteem of every independent mind, but, what is of muoh more importance, our own Solf-respeot. Suffer me to recall and review, very briefly, the course pursued toward thel Northern delegates by a portion of the representatives of tho South, which had its fit termination in a bolt and putting an op position ticket in the field. Democrats from the Northern States, whoii they enter a National Con vention, suppose they have a right to do so upon equal terms and equal footing with those from the South, or any other section of the country. They expect, also, when they thus enter, to submit to the f&ir action of a majority in such a Con vention, and abide its nominations. This was tho understanding of your constituency and mine when they sent us to Charleston. How were we met in that city the other day ? Therestoodlordly Alabama at the very threshold, with her ultima tum fully settled, requiring that wo should con sider the platform before deciding upon the can didates; and demanding farther that herexpreesed views should be gratified, or she would go out, and so break up the Convention! How shrunken and pulseless moat be that Northern heart which did not swell with indignation at these uttered threats and cavalier demands! What Northern delegate, with the spirit of oommon manhood in his breast, but that asked himself, in effect, “ what meat doth thece Southorn Geesars feed on,” that they have a right to hold a threat over the heads of others in a Convention of equals? The demand of Alabama was for a slave code, or Congressional protection of slave property in the Territories, in whioh a majority ot the Southern delegates, and certain submissive gontlemen of the Northern and Eastern States, concurred. In fact, it was required that a material—nay, vital—portion of tho platform adopted by tho party, with entire unanimity, in 1856, after six years of anxious dis cussion, should not only be yiolded up, but direct ly oppositelprinciplos adopted ! A political code, which, to tno Northorn Democracy, had become, as it were, “household words,” whoso sterling and palpablo truths had alraoet silenced even tho rank est rovilers of Democracy, must in a moment be blotted out as false or futile \ la 1856, both parties, North and South, agreed to leave to the people of the Territories the exclusive right cf legislation upon the subjeot of slavery within their own borders. In the emphatic words of President Buchanan, in bis memorable letter of acceptance of the nomination— I ''the people of the To rifones, lHe those of a State , arc to decide whether slavery shall or shall not exist nntktn their limits." At Charleston we were called upon to “ Wheel about, turn about, jump Jim Crow,” and say the people of the Territories should not have this right at all; but that Congress should legislate upon this subjeot for them—establish a slave code, in faot—for that is the plain senseof the demand. Nor did it stop here. Congressional protection for slave property in the Territories wan not only required, out “on the high seas," and whorever else “ constitutional authority ex tends.” You remember sir,—and yonr cheeks mast have flunked in humiliation, as did those of many other Pennsylvaniaua on seeing this in a printed slip, which was at one timo sent through the hall headed the “ Pennsylvania proposition.” You may remem ber, too, how soon these slips disappeared, and how innocent of advocates the preposition fell, amongst us, when this new sphere of Congressional action in regard to slavery was disoussed in the lishtfarnish ed by Judge Magrath’s recent opinion delivered in the Supreme Court of South Carolina, Inlhboaee of Captain Corrie—holding that the act of Congress of iho 15th of May, 1820, in regard to pittcy on tho high seas, did not apply to tne slave trade pro secuted between ports of toe Southern States and others in Afrioa, in whioh slavery was lawful! Precisely when and where this “high seas” feature of tho bolters’ platform was droppedrWouM be ay cry interesting foot to ascertain. it is, these words t cere dropped out of .the original creed, leaving, however, “the colored gentleman ” oarefully ensoonoed under the.indefinite canopy —“ wherever else Us constifHtiottal authority extends .” I suppose ifc . &mal?i-ke to this sec tion that Collector Bakov 1 has Hf« wDce J he so very lucidly boasts' of sustaining “ a platform dearly and explicitly defining our position on the question of State rights in the Territories. The Alabama ultimata** after respectful dis cussions; was rejected at Charleston; by a majority of twenty-seven, and we oalmly and firmly planted ourselves unon the well-understood and weti-di traifed Cincinnati platform of 1856. We did at first Sffer a olauie indicating our willingness (although the same has always been our understanding of the obligation) to carry out faithfully the decisions of the courts upon all questions of property arising in theTorritories. Some insisted that the Dred Scott oase covered the whole question; and wo offered thus to abide the result if that was, or should be come, the true state of affairs. But no: * l aut Casat , ant nihil)” said Mr. Yancey and bis compatriots; and so walked out of the Convention some thirty or forty of iUmemhers. I noed not speak of the ballotings for a candi date whioh succeeded, exoent to say that Judge Douglas repeatedly received a majority of a full | Convention; and from that moment, upon every ; fair principle regulating suoh bodies, ike reign and record of faction commenced. How graoefutiy did Judge Douglas and his friends yield to a bare majority in 1856; and with what earnestness did certain Pennsylvania friends of James Buchanan then declare this liberality should never be forgot ten! Thank Heaven! conscience has no reproaohes for me on this subjeot. After a series of factious and ineffectual ballots, THE WEEKLY PKBStf. Ta* Wiiut hia. wiE te a«t l*teMiteai te TifM CoHm, •• . .I.M 7iT» “ « <• T«* •• ~ Twenty “ “ (leumlteate-M Tw.nfy Coyiee.or over “ (to.itr—rf- Men eßheeritee,)«Mh.... : I.M For a Club of T*Mly~OM ot orer, we wlii wmitm atn eon to the retlM-w of the cm.* tat- Foetmeetere in inertlt DM« inM t» Th* irnuThmi. ' GiUIMIU. HUtM. iMued time time. wMontfe, t* tiM fir tte Celiloni* tteuwrl. tte adjourned, on the motion of Virginia, te the eity of Baltimore, and gate aaiaTltakoa te tkoee Stetee whoee delegatee had bolted, to ttetr T**«a eies. On reaeeeabHng at Baltimore, ell «r boit log friende, eaeept Bowth Caroßae ted HJie, ra appeafed, not kamkie or repMleat, bat jePee be fore, with thraeta and merited oieilltKei that the majority were reached to adopt > gomtot Sum preeented new odmanrioae e apeetee efiMten of marque—accrediting then in two oeaAetteg Cob- Tentione, then contempleted ! Owpoetag eetepe. tiona aiao came, appointed upon oer teriteaim. wad tendering no eondtUoai, thteete, or remmttime. Wo rotod to reeeire the Utter. It wee eeeagh for me that then new delegate* bad eoaae at ear lari tttion; that they hedbeaa alerted wader aaeb forme and noon each notice, aa they had been able to command. If tho Angel in •teed of Mr. Yancey, had Beaded the original Ala bann delegation and nn breathing renewed threate of section, I woald hnwe aponied them by my vote, and natnlnod their eompotiton. I acoracd, by any act or admbrion of mine, to rink my conatitnente below the lerel of any Boathorn constituency; and tbia I ahodd beta done if I had consented a aecond time to rit down in that Convention and deliberate under thethienta of ae rnmed superior*. Nor bed I much mere baaita tion in choosing between the two delegathrae from Louisiana. Upon the adoption of the report admitting ths freshly-chosen delegation, in those twe BiAtee—re jMtiog, I regret »H and others, by informing us at once. We have in formation of importance to communicate to him. It is thought that be has fallen heir to certain properties, and if so, it is highly necessary, for him to be informed of the fact immediately. We have traced Mr. Grassier os for as Boalsburg, at whioh place he resided until within a few weeks. Here we lose all trace of him, and no one knowa whither ho went. We think he removed from Boalaburg some time in Ma y.—Bellefonte Dem., July 12. Sudden Death.—The Manheim Sentinel says that on the Ist instant, John Philip Walts, an old resident of that place, and who lived alone for a number of yean post, was found dead in his bed. It appears that the deceased was complaining of indisposition on the previous evening, and not making his appearance on Sunday morning, the neighbors forced open his dwelling and found him in the state above described. a)eputy Coroner Eosmingor held an inquest over the body, and a verdict was rendered by the jury that deceased died from apoplexy. ■ Centre County.—The weather for the past week has been very unpropitious, notwithstanding that thefarmera havajioused nearly all their hay— and are now busily engaged in gathering in the golden harvest. - The crops promise an abundant yield, surpassing the most sanguine expectations of the community in general. The report that the weevil had done so much damage to the wheat is entirely unfounded —the damage has been but alight.— Bellejonte Democrat. The crops in Lehigh county, says the Re gister, sorer looked better or promised a more abundant yield. Our formers assure ns that the wheat and oat orops, with few exceptions, will be more than usually large. The corn planted before the wet weather set in is largo and looks fine; that planted subsequent to the rains is small .and does not promise so well, though there is no reason to expeot that it will not mature ana ripen before the fall frosts set in. Potatoes are growing finely and the prospeo ts for a fall orop were never more flattering. We observe, by the Jmerican Watchman, that the marshal baa finished the census of Look Haven, and the result is that the population num bers 4,600 inhabitants. Laser’s artesian well, at Reading, is 1,940 feet deep, and the drill is now trying to work through rook something harder tho» lint. The water is within twelve feet of the top of tho well, which shows that the supply is increasing. Hoi-uoatsbubo, Pa., shows strong symptoms of a revival of bnsiMts.’ A rolling mill is in pro cess of erection for the masoiaoturo of plate and boiler iron, and another for the manufacture of wire billets. Both those works are In the Imme diate yioinlty of two fnranees. ’ The llakveet is Ltcohiho ooDKir This season commenced in earoeet In the upper end of the oounty on tho 2d Inst - The report of the wheat orop all over the coahty IS good, and the yield premises to he abundant. The county of Northumberland has shipped of ooal, for 18W, np tot Jane 23d, 2,371,184 tons. The clip of wool in Ohio has-been-sold at about tho average of last year. 'The' Quantity amounts to ebont nine minion pounds. ' The crops of,(til, lands; iin the'vicinity of Norfolk, V» ~aie .