CONGRESS. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES; Friday, March 18. Debate on Mr. Liringftan't resolution continued. Mr. Isaac Smith did notpretend to prescribe limits to other men's faith—but he never could be lieve that men as wife as those who c'ompofed the Cdavention, would have left so important a regula tion as was uow contended for by some gentlemen, to mere uncertain cottttru£»ioa. He believed if fkty ntended that House (hould have had an a gn.cy in the making of treaties, they would have lo lp expref* term*—Had they done-fo? No thiak like it. So far from it, that they had une~ quivocally appropriated the treaty making power to the Prefidertt and two third;# of the Senate in terms at express and positive as words could form ; the gentlemen in opposition could not—did not deny it. But fjjy they, this power may be abuled, fhamefulljr abused, and therefore, we will etnjlrue it out of the hands the people have placed, it in. We will a (fume and declare ourselves the jolt guardian of the people, and we will cry out libmy, liberty; and, as the people love the found (he hoped they would always love the 'fubftunce) ■perhaps they will believe us. Here reft* the'falhioy. The,people knew whether they-knew or not, tint they chose the Prcfident, and they firmly believe, as well they may, that he-is their guardian. The people knew that they also chose the Senators,and they li'kewife think they are their guardians. How >ve, said he, became JoU -guardians will require*a modelly superior to tkat of New-England to ex- P'* lD * The people have declared that' the 'President and Senate (hall pake treaties, without a (ingle ex ception, and left there (hould be any rniftake or cavilling about it, they have put it in written words, as they thought, too plain to be doubted, too pofi tvre to be contradided. It appeared to him tkat w * s • Efficient answer, though a Jhort one, to* . laborious arguments. had in'favour of their ■interference to fay, that the people wills it other wsic/ic volopjlc Juhco ; Jla prordtione voluntatis. '" c y had ondcr consideration alterations, or a tnendments to the Conduction, those argaments •inight perhaps be proper; but-as matters now : d, they are mere inapplicable declamation. A gentleman from-Virginia told them that the" government of the Unitedi>tateswas a government but said that in the (hort time -it had existed, they were completely routed. Neverthe lcl,he mentions several cheeks that A ill (land their •ground,amongothers biennial ele&ions were a check upon the executive. -According to his calculation, if d - werc check Vpon that House.in the-ratio offourto two and of fix to two and therefore, the people trulled them lift, than any other branch of government, and he raoft cordially adopted that gentleman*! own words, " if the opi nions now contended for prevail, nothing will re main to be done by checks." -Conjlruaion wil an iwer every purpose. Several gentlemen kadadduced argemefltsfrom the government of Great Britain, and had attempt ed toaffimilate the-American.government to it, to ■gne them the greater force. -He would examine that mtttr. :Did the people of England chufe their King every four years ? Wat he impeachable ? No, *e earn do no wrong. Did they ele& -their House of Lords or Senate..? No, they are heredi tary, as well aa their-Prefident. Must two .third's or them approve every treaty before it can become vaud ? No fach thing. How a.parallel then, could be formed out of such diverging lines heleft to «ifer men, it was greatly beyond his poor abilities, and he was equally incapable of comprehending ar guments drawn from so myiterieus afource. A gentleman from Vitginia boasted much'of the superabundant love of liberty that prevailed in the state he had the honour to rcprefent. The groans •f 3 or 400,000 black.people h6ld in bondage, he laid, afflicted his ears, and made kim hesitate -altho' he wished to believe the encomium he bestowed.— He did not -like boaftiag—it provoked retort and offence followed. He should not fay one word-in praise of New-Jeriey—it did not need it. Mr. Livingften .'said, that the very-able fuppert this resolution -haij received, night seem to release him from any obligation of speaking in its defence, nor would he now trouble the committee with any observations on the fubjed, if those he made on the introduction of the bofinefii had not been mis dated, and hit subsequent explanation partly sup. prefTid—He had dated when he had laid the rcfolu> tie* on the table, a« a reason for requeuing the T»P« r *» that im p9rta*t and conjiiiutional would probably arise on the discussion of the treaty. It had been represented ,(certainly from mifappre tienfion, not design) that he confined the life of the papers to the elucidation of a constitutional queftiou only : ind it had been asked with an air w great triumph, how the ioftru&ions and eorrefpon dense could throw any light on the question of constitu tionality, to deeide which nothing was neceflary but a comparison of the treaty with the constitution ? Mr. Lirragfton said he had not confined the utility of the papers to that point, but tfcat if h« had, it wonld not be difficult to suppose a cafe in which they were neceflary to determine the conftitutiona- i lity of the treaty.—The constitution, -he said, gave 1 to the President the powers to make treaties by and tu'ub ihe advice and cenfent ef'the Senate. Men, rc fpeftable for their talents and patriot ism, had'fiip pofed, that by the true conftrudion of this claufc, the Pre/ident could make no treaty nnlefs by the: previous advice, and the fuhftqum consent of the Sc-' nate; in other words, that the Senate should ad-' vise the making «f a treaty which they could only do before it was commenced ; and rtiould eonfent to it by a ratification after it was concluded—He. would give no positive opinion on this fubjeft, but foppofed it a point worthy the attention of the j house. The conflru&ion, he said, appeared rea- Ibnablc, & hadbcen heretofore fandioned by pra&ice. Two instances he could recoiled; one was in the I treaty of Holftein, wheje Governor Blount was u vested with full power* and fpccially empowered 1 by jnd witk the sdvlee and consent of the Seßate," The.other inliance wad found in the answer of'the President to the French mini Iter, who,offered to enter into negociations for a treaty of commerce, wdich tho President declined by referring him to the meeting of the Senate, which was not then in feflion —If the President supposed he could net commence a negociation without the concurrent of the Senate, it£*rc "force to thjc cOnftru&idiH and, if it was a true one, nothing was more de monftrable than that file paperi were necrfTary ti determine whether the treaty in this point had beet Tonftituttonally made. •But whatever doubts, Mr.laivingften laid, might lavefheen oceafioned by the general cxprcflions with :ertainly have been removed by the explanation which had been 'very property demanded by the Member 'from Connecticut, >(Mr. "JYacy). »He lad, on decafion, -fleclared,, papers were required for general infortnatkni,'fo be appli :d a* that information might render it proper. ■l. To the 'fuperihtendiflg -power Awhich the House had over all the officers of government-— ind 2d. To guide their discretion in giving or refusing their fanftion to the treaty in those points where it interferes with thc'legiflative power. Gentlemen had founditconvenient, because some athers had disavowed any intention to-impeach, to Eonlider the firft.ground as wholly abandoned ; but in the nature of things this caiild not be the cafe. It was impossible to determine that we not impeach, until-the papers were'fees. Fa&s might then appear that would render that an unavoidable measure which was not now eantmplated. 'If, for: instance, he said, instead of a treaty with -Great- Britain, we were-«ow difcilfiing one formed with the Porte, -where .it-is the cnQom for ministers to of the correspondence it should appear that our mi the treaty, he aflted, whether, in such cafe, that House would not thitvk themfebes obliged to im pc -h: if they would, (and he thought the obli gation could uot be when cafesrifcightexift where without any pievtous intention, -an impeach ment was unavoidable. The-integrity of the gen tleman -who bad 'formed this treaty, was, he (aid, too well cftablidied, to lead any one into a 'fuppdfi tian that uny'thing of the'kiwd could have occurred in this itfltance.j but it might in others. The idea of impeachment, therefore, though not at present contemplated, could not be formally abandoned. ®efore he-considered the lecond and most itji portant ground of opposition, Mr. Li-vingflon said he Ws>uld take notice of an objection to the Form of the refokition, by a gentleman'from South-Caroli na,-(Mr. 'Harped). It was ;of a kind which he had not expected from the quarter in which it arose. He had objefte'd to the humble stile of requett. If we had a right to the papers, we (hould demand them. I would plant my foot Ik re, fays the gentleman, and tequire the papers as a right!' 1 — Mr. Livtngflon'faid, tbat the resolution was couch ed in the icfpe&ful terms with which that house 'bad always add re {fed the fir ft magilirate ofthe Union"; that civility-and refpeft were -always due to him-; aid that he w*« persuaded the member 1 would fee -the propriety, (air this, as heihed on other occafioaf) of transferring into public 11% that urbanity and politeness for which he was so remark able in his private intercourse. The fame gentle man had •obferred, that there was no reason for requesting the /papers, because any member 'might infpea them« the clerk's office of the Senate.— He could not suppose if this were the fact that the . publicity of the papers was a good reason to prove that ought neit to be communicated. Mr. Livingftow did not however think that individual members ought to owe their information to the courtesy -of an officer of the Semite which they had a right officially to receive as a "body. "It had been stated, that he {(Mr.'L.) having had access to these papers, could not want any information they might contain. He would state the facts re lative to that tranfaftion : It was true, he said, that a* chairman of the committee appointed to enquire into the cafe of imprefled stamen, he had been indulged with -a view of the inftru&ions and cerrcfpondencc ; but engrofled by-the important objed then referred to him, he had pato little or no parts as did n&t'relate to that futgjedt. After an interval of feme deys, he went with an intention of completing the perufalof them, but was told that he could not fee them'without leave lain nine weeks on demurrage on that account. To remedy this grievance in future, a number of 'refpe&able merchants have it in contemplation to build wet docks in and about Wapping ; and the board of cufioms l was applied <0, t» Wv-thtir ■veyor attend and estimate the experifes, "whose re iport amounted to between eleven and twelve hun dred thotftand pounds; upon which a fubfeript ion was opened and Ailed in two hjurs, with a surplus •of Seventy odd thou [and pounds." CITY OF WASHINGTON, April 30. Thursday evening a dreadful fire broke out at the-clegant houfos lately'built by "Mr. Peters, which, in a (hort time, reduced them to alhes. The da mage cannot be'dftimatedat less than 50C0I. Wc lament there is'itrongreafon to fufpe£t that it wai not an accidental difaller. 4 No certain intelligence was received of the Fede ral Loan bill lalt night; although, from good au thority, we are aflurad that the Senate took up thi'i bjfme&on Monday last. April 28, At a meeting of the citizens of Norfolk and Partfmoufh, held at the Town Hall, in the Bo rough of Norfolk, April 26. 1796, convened a greeabic to notifications to consider of the proprie ty pr impropriety of addicffing Congrtfs on the ifubjeft of the Brrtifh 1 reaty. Seth Foster, ECq. Mayor of Norfolk Borough, ■was eledled President, and Jahu Cowpec Secretary. Resolved unaßimoufly, That an address be pre sented. Relulved, That a committee be composed of the following gentlemen, viz. John Nivifon, Wallig Wilfoo, William Newfum, Thomas Emmerfon, ' ~' f Richard E. .Lee, John George Kelly, Da niel Bedinger, W il!iam Wilson, Robert Taylor,jun. Jofiah Cowper, Thomas Parker, and Edward Ar cher, to prepare an address for the «oniideration of tlie meeting. ■I he committee returned, and the Chairman re ported the following addrcfa. £-Sce address at bot tom. 3 The address teing read, a motion was made t» adjotim until to-morrow morning at 10 o'clock which was negatived. A motion was made to adjourn until this after noon at four o'clock, which was negatived. Oh motion, Refoived, 7 hat. thp address reported by the com tTittec be received as the sense of this and that the fame, together with-a copy of thefc ptoceedingt, figncd by the President and Secretary, be transmitted to the Representative of this dif trift in Congrefr. Oil the tjucAion, 'aye*, -go, noes, 83. Ths meeting was thendifmiflcd. SETH FOSTER, President John Cowpw, Secretary. To the Honorable the House of Reprefentatiws of the United States. The .Address of the -Sublcribers, Citizens of the towns of Norfolk and Portsmouth, Refpeafully reprefeuts, THAI they have attended to the deliberations of your honorable body upon the British treaty, with a folicitudc proportioned to the importance of the fubje&, and, that they were content to have awaited the decision of your honorable house, from a reliance that filch decision would have comported with the honor and inteiefls of pur country. But as attempts are {making to induce your house to adopt measures touching the said treaty, which, under exiiting- circumltarKrea, are rot, in "our judge ment*, calculated to promote the interests of our country, we- cannot forbear alio to txpre(« our feti timpnts. -r ~~r Vve declare that we have ever considered that a treaty, in the nature of that now under yourconfi rderation, could not be fully and completely carried into efieft without the concurrence of your house, founded an a convi&ion of the expediency of such concurrence ; and we contemplate with extreme sensibility every attempt that ha* or mas be made to deprive your house of such an important conlti tutional right. V» e forbear to enlarge on this ft»bje&, though fa I intereftiag to our feelings, and we shall only add , that we do not believe any partial er local consider- I ations or Dolicr. will mSm-riM votir drcifiong oa -