ADMISSION OF BANSAS. rrSERATS, FEBRUARY 24T1. 11r. BucustEw x from theSelect.Cornmittes, 101 which was referred certain resolutions re- lacing tithe admission of Kansas into the , Union as it State, made the following . report : That the Committee; in addition . to re potting back to the Senate the ro3otutions referred to them—the one with a recumtnen- Amite that it be indefinitely po,troned, and the pother in an amended form--deem= it proper to-state the grounds upon ahipli their action •ir founded=.: - •So pertinacious and vehement hare been theetforts to rendei this measure of admission , obnoxfons and unpopular,. and so much is the peace and harmony of the coiLntry involved in a correct understanding of, it; that your committee believe that some examination of the subject in the Legislature, to be followed by the, expression - of its jtigeMent, in the form of a resolution, will - diSabtisa the minds of many from ( . 4.4 impre:C-dons,:.and bare a • salutary effect upon public opinion. Our experience in Pentriyhania in making and amending constitution's may he examined, • to aid us in solving the difficulties of this Kansas question. Fer that pfirpose some ref erence-will be made to our awn constitutional - history. In 17-76; in consequence of a ciien far from the committee of safetyofailadelPhia . to the committees of :the several counties, dosing the resolution_of the Continental Con gress of the . 15th May,. Members were' ap• pointed from the several counties to vincial Cot/faience, which met in Philadelphia on the 18th June, and adjourned finally the 25th cf the same month. This conference .recommended the -etectioit - -of delegates, to assemble in convention, and forni a constitu tion for Pennsylvania, as- an -independent • State, and provided the manner in which the.- . elections• for that purpose! should be held. la consequence of this recommendation, dela ..gates Where chosen by the people, who as-. semble'd in Convention. on the lath day of July, 1776, and proceeded to form the coniti tutien of that year, without subinitting it, to a rote.uf the people or other proceFa of ratifi 7 wait:M.—That constitution, _ it will be- seen, lad a revolutionary origin, and it .continued in farce fourteen rears .umil 1790. It con- mined some-tat/4s which disturbiid its practi cal operation. The legislative'department, consisted of a single body, as i-n colonial times, and the executive consi.red ota council and prident,, the latter being selected by the joint _vel;e'of the council and .assembly. A council of berAors was also established, who were to review, from time to. time, the cow- duct of the < different. departments of the government, and report to the people any vio lation of the constitution'by either.; and they were empowered; by a two-third vote of their number, to call w convention to amend the constitution. A single legislative body,. -a leinral executive,and a. censorial council ,to criticise official action, but Without power, to enforce its judgement, were the three capital errors of that constitution; and' rhe arrange ment for the amendturrit through the action of the censors was found to be impracticable, A majority was . % favor at one time of a con• vention, and att anotlier against-it: hut; at no time ,could an- . rtflitniative two-third vote , be obtained, Finlly, under the pressure of necessity in favor of-cisme, the subject was taken ny by the Legislature, and on the - 24th of March; 1789, in Assembly, reaolu tions were adopted setting krth that alter ations. nd amendments to the , constitutioa, were immediately necessary ; reciting froml the Declaraion of Independence the assertion of the-right of the peotlle to alter or to abet ish their government, and to institute a new one, and also the clause of the bill of- rights .in the existing constitution—" That govern :meat is, or ought to be, instituted for die common benefit, protection and-security of - the people, nation or co:ntun i nity, and, not for the patuneut or advantage of any singly; isr-set of men, who are a part only of that community—and that flte community bath iii indubitable ; unalien able and indefeasible.tight to reform, alter, or abolish government in such . a manner as shall be to that community judged most conducive to the public weal!'—From all which, as well as the nature of society and the princi ples of governtnent,it manifestly appeared that the people have, at all times, an inherent right to` alter and amend the form of govern ment in such a manner as they shall .think proper-; and that they are not and cannot be - limited to any certain rule or mgde of accom plishing the same, but may make choice of such'method as may be best adopted to the end _ proposed ; and that fot further reasons assigned, the delay'of the mode prescribed in the con stitution "to:. ametalernent ought not to be ad mitted. It was therefore proposed and earnest ly recommended to the citizens of the Com monwealth to take this sobject into their serious con-ideration; and,,if they concurred in opinion with the Assembly that a cocven tion fot the purpose of revising and altering the constitution of the State tight to be cal - led, it .was submitted to whether it would not be c . mvenient and proper to elect members of such convention at the next gen eral election, and that, upon their pleasure being signified at the next sitting, it Would_ provide by a law the time And place of the meeting Of the conventioe, arid for the pay , tient of- expenses incurred. thereby._ These 'important resolutions were adopted by_the de cisive .vote 'of forty4ne to seventeen. At its next session the Gerleral Assembly called .a c.onvention . "for the pur_po-e, of reviewing, and if they see occassiore altering-and amend , jog the constitution •of the State." The reso lutions for „that purpose were adopted by a vote of thirty-nine to seventeen on the- 15th. of September, 1789. Thee legislative pro eeediugs resulted in the constitution - of 1790, and would seem to stand justified by the •, , reasons assigned, and by the,further one, that although the constitution of 1776 provided a - - mode of ameudment, it did not fo rbid other modes ; and,that• therefore the ordinary law: snaking power, could - initiate necessary proeeedi Nif• chunoe.— That constitution of x. 1799 was preelaim;l by the convention, and put in force by it, without any sub Mission of the instrument, or any part - of it, to a topular vote, It remains in force -to this day, a period . of sixty-eight yeais, , modified only by certain - ameniinents to which it had been subjected. In 1825 a law war passed by the-Legisla ture for taking the sense of the people upon the question of a convention to make amend , tneuts.-i That, proposition -wits however re ,' jected. • - Ten ,ceari later—in 1835 lei's was pas- ! e;441, entitled, "An act to provide for calling al convention with limited papers" It provided 1 (OVA Tule for the purpose of ascertaining the sap* of the .citizens thie Commonwealth,' on the expedieusy of calling a convention of. itelegatim, to Le l eir g ta by the people, with authoitly to 61 ; binit. amendments of the•Strite" (Smstitution to a vote of , a the _.people, for their ratification or: rej4otion, nd witkno other _or greizter power whotiocrer,"., The vote taken 'in. pursuance -of this set slut in fo re a a _c A nigention, and bi tigs inisiequent act of tite 2:Atis of March,..tB36: - proe'ision was made for.eh;cting thO delegates, and for the. submission of the aduaeralments proposed by them, Without pausieg.-ta explain the !verde char I•eavus - which wasted the Legislature' molrietiple: it is clear itiat conseatica of pa.2g . tsz. ti member:: of which were elected with reference to these lairs, possessed Only limited powers. They could not form a new constitution, nor abrogate the old, nor put their amendments in force. They could only frame propositions of atnendments, requiring a vote to give them validity. Those amendments of 1838 were _adopted, and the constitution of 1790 was so fat changed as they expunged old matter or in troduced new.. Among those amendments Was one an relation to future amendments, which now constitutes the 10th article of the constitution, and providei' that amendments may be proposed by amajorite of all mem bers elected-to each llouse,of the General As sembly- at . two successive sessions; *hied), upon being approved by s public vote,' will take effect. Under this' provision one atnendement was adopted in 1850, and four in 1857. If this provision regarding changes in the constitution, sl-ould receive-the same construction as did the provision in the con stitution of 1776, it does not furnish an ex clusive mode of stiendment; and ,the legis lative power of the State is comOtent at any time to provide for calling a constitutional; , convention, •the power of which, whether, general, or special and limited, will depeixli . opon'the law under which the- delegates are chosen. And as this section of our present coniititutionAdoes not - forbid other modes .of amendment than that provided -by ite it is clear that this construction must be accepted as a trte one. I Let the facts of this -sketch be applied to • the convention and constitution .of Kansas, end - difficulties and misconceptions regarding them will disappear. The Legislature of that Territory passed an act for taking the since ' of the people itteen election in 1856, upon the question of a convention to form a constitu tion for Kansas. Subsequently, on the 19th day of February, 1857, the Legislature passed the law for, the election of delegates to the convention. The delegates were elected in view of these acts, and their Powers were, of course, general, and similar to those of our conventions - of 1776 and 17,90-the only conventional-bodies ever assembled in this State - , from whose ,hands cattle forth an entire constitution. The necessary consequence is, that the constitution framed by the Kansas convention would be valid, and subject only to the acceptance of , Congress under that proviiion of 6 consti tetion of the United States, which gives its t i jurisdiction over the admission of a new State. It is not necessary hen) to inquireT whether the shivery clause of that instrument stood upon di ff erent grounds from other parts of that. if that be offered, the answer is, that _it was submitted to popular decision. If no such leial obligation existed, it was not neces sary-to submit it, and the doing so wawa ' voluntary act of the convention, with reference to political reasons eond public expectation,' rat her than 'legal 'course. The constitution, therefore came to Congress a lawful- instru mero, nud sanctioned' by ordinary legal and constitutional principles. Now, updu questions of public or political right, the whole country and all its inhabi tants are under Law, and ,judgment must be given in favor of that party or individual whose position -stands 'sanctioned by it. _lf our system were not so, through all its parts, it would be worthlessend speedily dissolved ' under the breath of rev olution, or be struck dOwn by the strong arm of force. Nor is this condition of things incompatible witht rue lib erty and freedom. r Our system has abundant facilities for amendment, change'and reform, in connection with power to enforce existing , laws and rights, public and sprivate.—And that people who cannot control'lleir passions, but will-str ik e at law orl constitution other- e, wise than by legal - and orderly modes o f amendment, are unfit for free governments, and cannot long maintain them. The lawful and 'regular character of the proCeeding for the formation of the Kansas I constitution, and the validity of that instru ment, as presented to Congress, having.been shown, and the argument illustrated by our own constitutional history,it remains to iotice Some of the leading objections heretofore made and to give them a fair. reply. ' • Ist. The oljection that the constitution is unchaneable . until 1864, is fully_ answered by the citations already made from Pennsyl vania constitutional hist6ry. We may con clude that the same power will exist in the people,of Kansas eo,cbange their constitution , through a regular process, as that exercised by our own people in`changingehe constitu tian of - 1776. The cases 'are alike upon the question of power, and the one iirsolved by the decision of the other.—Any one who ac• eepts ear Pennsylvania practice as r gular and lewful,„will not doubt that, upon admission, the people of the new State ofKansas will have power, through a convention, to. amend or i change altogether their fundamental law, retaining in any case it ' s republican form. The power stands upon the solid foundation_ Where our fathers placed it, and upon general grounds of reason where a constitutionpro virles fur its own ame ndment, she mode or , time so provided cannot he exclusive, unless (others are expre.sly prohibited. Every -presumption should be made in favor of popular right in legal instruments of go.. vernment, and the powerOf changing them must remain entire, unless expressly limited or forbidder!: Thee Kansas constitution does' , pot forbid amendment before 1861, and it I does contain a declaration of popular power over constitutions similar to those quoted •by , our , Legislature of 1789, in a case precisely. similar tn ehe present one. 1 2d. Upon the final adjourment of the, ' Kansas convention' without its submission of the whole Constitution formed by it to a rote,' objectt'on was made to it upon that ground ; and a constitutional philosophy altogether , novel was produced upon the oceasion„to I sustain that objection, by Robert J. Walker,' Ithe of the Territory. It may le i found expounded at large in his ' stibsequent I letter of resignation, and it constitutes .the Imateriel point in the message of Mr. Secretary Stanton. to the 'Territorial Legislature; on the ,Bth . of December; 1857. It Was this, shortly , stated'-that the people cannot make' or attend ia constitution through• agents,- sovereignty '.being "inalienable, a mite, sod incapable of delegation;" in whole or in part. The pm t tical result arrived at by - Goverrot and Sec s retary, from this doctrine, was the invalidity of the Lecompton Constituticm; without a popular vote upon the whole of it.—Strange as it may seem, all this is spread out in offi cial.