H II MI U LES F. READ & H. It FRAZIER EDITORS; m 1 jilipoilvit4oOtivevf. • • G - I. ihns . tUStitioista.Er4'. - : . l 1 ,e, would call the attention, of the ne ,uit il. press to Dr: JORDAN'S Address, ali d would, su gge st that they publish it, wher eve theylcan o so, before the election. lke. h a q, iseeti the:papers and documents from -whithl he 4uotes,. and .am vouch for lhe tor ree rs 'og the - ' extracts. : The subject :of , Bt a c Equality is_otie that haibeen too much in ected in this campaign. , Ili is treatiA wit i;eincrkable ability, and we knew of no better trlt for circulation. Itsheuld lie is sued in c. tras, and well c i rculated: _ 1 , sT4ii3 TRUE xssuk 'dram to the Free While Citizens of the yet Free . States. 4ir 3ottßso.t it ) : TonDAN. I • . '• W i .runcorow, 1)..C.; Oct. 14. - 1856. 1 Y,YELt.ow :Cot:warm:EN ! The PreSi. deaths). eleCtiou is upon us? • Never before ha's our country witnessed so exciting• a ean • 1 • .vass; !neverr have the Amertvmpeop e been CalleduPOn to vote on so important a queS ,. •tion+-4 : question, .fraught` with such fearful - , , ecitisegetences, involving the future •wellare and 'deareSt :interests of this Republic ! Are . `you pkpdred fon, the contest ? Do you ful ly apOreciate:its . importance ? Do you viz dirs(aitd the - frite iisite? A fear there are. thOsandsr--14,-frotn my travels 'and inter cohisel*ith the people in the Western States during th last, few weeks, I am, convinced there hre ouiands and tens' Of thousands of e. t h (*cod and onAlast men in the `free .States who , do not : know what the real issue_: is! . llow many, for insmnee, understand what is meant .by STATE! EQUALITY—.-this "new Aoctrine," . which lurks in the Cincinn.iti Platform in a, diSguisedintanner, and is boldly maintained thr4ughent . the South' by the ,press' and the fi:i, speakers vorable to the g election of Mr. Bu- , chanan? Yet•this. very doetrine, -aeknowl edged .by ',pits' advocates to be. a "new ? > doc- tribe s plausible and.harmless enough on its flie4 hut 0111 of deceit and z danger - ,constitutes , the rue issue in' the present canvass. I ven ture to say that no more than one in ten of the ii oters in the free . States-:—party leaders-. exelptedfiknows - what is ,meant .by 4 State=Eqtality ",..and yet I fed _quite sure that if thi.), doctrine Was fully - unders . tood by the free! menl of. the yet free,:North, there - are th4shn(lS of honest Wen yet I ingerinn• in the sactilledPemoeratie and .American . iiayti,,q,. - who :winild. instantly and indignantly 'leave ; and i Join. the army, of Freedom:m(l the. stitution. Believing thus, - irny ,eouutry , 1 hiwi your attention to'this subject be- I fe. • it is too I shall be bricf.'usinti:nci Co me fvr MMMEPMMI in n c xtia(,..is shall use, only such as'are ~, e t to the point and .or .Acknowiedged, iioriti. I propose to show what ismcant ~. ris riiew doctrine ofState Equality .; that.. it e ters'r,intO.the Cincinnati, Platform;.and. thatit in] reality conatitnes the true issue in ._ thiS.canyass ., . _ , ,,,a ! . . _... . _ . , ..• in cOnduCtirskthe present ranipaig,n, I have . noticed that we:differ very much from our -Denaocratiestportents, they charge , us al ntost exinsivity with things which .We deny and reptidiate; While we, as a general thing, In;elievei 'charge them with no measures,doc tibies, or sentiments; but such as they ae knowle4re and advocate 4 _ , . We might. retali ate by charging them falsely, as they. do us; hue we have no occasion. They admit .enOugh, it,secros to me, to ruin any party.-.-- teertafnlybave no dispoSitiOn to chfte them Itith What they' do not admit, .and will not . s delt. • The proper way to learn the meas ures and principles of a party is to go to the party itsel ank-not to its opponents. .We should ,'I not ' consult Democratic authority tolknoW l what are the principles of. the Re; publican party,but should go to the PlatfOrm, and to the writers and speakers Of the party itself; and in order to know what Constitute : the principles of Modern Democracy,' we Should not rely upon what Republican wri ters and speakers say, buTosbould go to the / Climinriati.Platform for information and to., r. the writings and - speeches of acknowledged _ :Pemoc-atie leaders of.the present day. This is what I propose to .do. :. : Ili there ever was a: time when the Amcfl- . • _de :peOple ,were &led upon to vote. under-. stet idingly,. to know full} what .the otiestion: i • at issue is—when the good ,man. and. the pat- AtshOuld throw their bfgtence on the side of 1 'lllnar-,- . -tbat time is no - * !• What will be the effect 4 f my vote'? . What tare the principles and measures which_ I. am supporting, and • what l'f'ilt be their probable effect - upon the ,country,: if adopted? should be the injury of eyery ',honest man who loves big country more. than - party. I beg-you, therefore s real= eT, whitevcr may be your politics—if yott a heart love- your country and her free insti ' . tioarA, and are opposed to. the- extension• of 8 very, whether you may favor *the 'dee ti nof Buchanan, Fillmore, 'or Frettl'ont— ' .44 'kith me patiently through this investi b , • _ ticin- that you milt read what •I. have to (and ~ . , -• Y, -clirefully examine the. testimony I ogeik,aad then, all I ask of you is, to vote . 0, a coming election as. your judgment and I. you i ouscatime .may fticiate,regarille.ss of con-' seal races. Do :what you believe to be axon; though parties' and . cliques should be .riven I r'• • to at ones! , ' .-- - ' - . 1 shall 'not discuss the . ; question of Slave iy.' ' To-such as are favorable_ to that lust'- . talon, and its 7 expansion,'.' ..I have not a word to say, except that . 144 need not.read • any .Further. I take it fer,granted that Slave .. ry is an' evil---an - evil to theStetc, an,evil to the sialle; and a greater evil to the rita,ster-= and,litterefere, that it should not be extend . 0. ' i And - it is. to I.uch of my . countrymen nly, as agree withme itt.this view yet - wile, I fear, I-' - 11 • ' ' - a' 'tre an ntenttona y• going to vote -i=. rcet,, ly..f.br its extension, that I now appeal.- i'..citiAnow, my countrymen—for you have - lt.ape4 Muth on this subject during. the list few\ Mouths-741tat the history of oar_Goyern . uncut, from its: earltest .commencement, , and wear ore it had - an,existen&L-froin_.the bixilaratiotiof Independence itself, dOwn to • ..185-has."n against Slavery; and its: ex.:. . tetiaimiitito free . territory. The oixiinanee .ef i rits7,: *bleb prohibited it in all the North w', TeiritorY ;. the .alkilitioraof . the - sliVe. P .3 4eilvieteli*lt area in 1808,' and was la rporatod in Mir present.constitutiOn • ..aed , . ,le jWissouri gompromisa, passed in 'lB2O, and!:reaffirmed, In the treatir. passed Texas, ill .05S 7 4altilkow that it:has . lieettitn este)- . • isho. piiinciple'of this Goverinnea;for,Con:' gresa to "intervene' and.. p'rohibit'SlaVery and dir aftt by - . .c. 1 • , . . •= I , . . . ; . .. • ' ' ' 1 , . . , , ' • , • • I i . . . . 4 ;•;;;.; ..r7., , 1 ,-,'•••" . . " • ' ' , ~. . . . . . • • • , ' . ~, . . . . _Sr . . __..._ . . . - - . . . .1 i. - • , • , . -. . . . . • A. , _ . . . _, ....::, ~. :,. •.- '..i. i 1 • - . . .. . ..., . . ... .. .. . . . . . . . ; , .... . . .. . .. . . . . ..,. . 1 . ' : :7 1 . ;- ,.... ...,_. ,-, . .._ . . . . ; j., . - . , .L.' • ., "7., ' -. 74. 1. :, 4 .1 ... . ~. . , . _ .. . ~ . . . . . . • ". ' ,' .- , . ' .• '4 , , , ,1. .'' ,',: . ~ '.. .. . ' i.., ,! .t . , , . ,-" c • '-.-• . ;•., ,:. • , ~, • ~,....! ' . ' ''''' ' F . " 1 . I llt . s 1 , s ..,. ..-,:...,.-... , i ,- - - ~ r ... •1. . .4- . , -• .1 .:. : - - ',', . - - - L - . , '',' ' ' . 4 ' .• ~ •.- -I ,--. • : --- ~ i- - . ..._ ...•. , •._ . ~. , . . , . ....... . . _ „. _ - i, , , , . ...• . . ... ... .. .._ . - . _l.. - -- .:.-t.,' i• • • ' : . - . , - . . - ‘a ; • . • • 11....—...---------- -- 7 -- - : . _ In the Territories ; . in other words, to oppoSe Its extension:, ,Stich has been thernile. The exception.. was_ in , the case of Utahl and; • New Mexico, organized in 1850, where; it was con. tended, by Clay and; Webster, that as these Territories aline . to :its five-L-covered by the laws of Mexico; whieh prohibited Slavery— it was anneces.rary to pass •any prohibitory laiv for them. Besides,,thecouary was such, Slid Webster and others,•thatBlaVery could never be Made pref . ] table in those Territories, and hence would not seek to Via,; there, This., you see,_ was a mere exception :to the rule--- a mere matter of policy in -.that; particular case—whereas the principle 01,1 the • Govern. meat is and has been INTERVEN TION and PRO- - . . tunrrm:F. And - yet this mere . e.teeption regard to Utah And New MeNiCo, included in the." Compromise Measures bf 1850 ;" is .the foundation for the great .Democratic princi ple of non-interrention," discororo by Mr. Douglas in%ianuak,•lB.s4,! Only think of it--a mere excepan to be Cal ka a greatpri,n ciple',/ But let that , p4,ss. 1. :hare • allu d ed tbusibrielly to the •hisibry of .our ,Govern ment is to the exclusion of Slarety .from the Territories, that- you maythe'bett;pr perceive the contrast between what lias been its es tablished policy this subject, and that which a certain class of experimenting poli ticanS arc now trying to fOistaipon the coun try- as•the true doctrine and and-policy' ofthe . Constitution and: the Govermnent. • The real issue; and only isstie,•in thd pres ent eontek, is the extension or non , extensiob of Slavery into the Territories now free. But. as it is thought that the people , in some parts of the country are not ,yet prepared for so bold a _, ineasure,.the.issue is ougrfto be diS-. iised by the plausible catch-word of "State Equality"--4hUs :palming off a most inlii- Tpous . imposition upon the henest,tinauspect ing people of, the Free:State's.: Fpr a while direr, the passai4c of the:Kansas - - . ISleiliraska bill Popular Sovercig.iity, 6r, as it xVia; nio4 fa ; iniiiarly called; Squatter-Sovereignty, s Nwas the ,cry, and it :deceived not a.-few of the hod,- est masses; for, what'more fair than Popti, lar SovekeigutV, or the right of the people to govern thernselves? 'But it was'soon dis- covered, •the;ever-vlgilant gliardians of `` the institution," 'that this might be used as a.Fice Coil tnea:sure. It was therefore.repu 7 diated, and STATE EQUALITY 'substituted. That is now the • wateh-W4d and ery—tlie great underlying•pritkiple of the • Deincrera . ie party .ButA STATE EQUALITY triean.SLAvEs- rr EXTENSION ! With these preliminary ob s'ervations, 1 E•roceed directly to. the subject, remarking only- that the extracts:- whkh . • shall Mal;e may Le:relied on, as I have ~bef ore me the ~pipers, - speceltesjand documents, from which they•r4r taken.—havingproe&ed them at a good deaf of expense and trtifq.:. —So that .1 - might give page - and date.; I therefore lied rnyselfrz„ponsibld for the cor rectness of every quotation ') • '; sT.V/T, EQUALITY., • The State Of Tennsy believe, the honor of furnishing the fo-.lt;iCort,:ention where this . new dogma of thei Democratic creed waslforinally recognized. Among the resolntio4 adqpted- at its' last.DernOeratie State . Conkention, held sonic tithe last winter Or spring ritl which Mr. Buehanan' .. was for mally nominated for the Presidency, occurs the fullowh4: , : "Resolved, That the r Equality lf the Statekis the Vital, element of the Constitution and fluit the interference with the ri, , ..;:hts of the states by those who stek to di:ire ,, ard the sacredgtutranteci of the past, by all •orbers, should be rehnkiql with the game spirit that we would denounce ltul repudiate all attempts to erect °ploys ntsuNcrioxs between those who are entitled tO share the bleBsings and ben .efits or our ifee insfitutioOs." The "odiOus distinctions" Means the:dis , tinctions•Whieh most of the Free States yet make, in not , allowing- the !.slaveholder .to Come into the State with his human chattels,. and• hold theM as such. • ,SWace"Equaiity is to do away with all Such odious distinctions, as we shall prOentfy.scc: The resolutions off' this Convention were presented: to Mr. Irr phanan, and ,(n . the Bth day of May, 1856, he amepted and iendOrsed them ;: at which time. be said: • ' " The duties of, the President, irbOmsoever he mar be, have been 41early and ably indicated - by the ad mirable resolutidus of the Convention . which lon have just presented to me, and ATA. OF wnicu, viith out reference tti those personal to myself, I !MARTI . LT ADOPT." - . . I One point is • now settled ; Whatever ' State Equality, or, as the resolution has it, the Equality of the States, may' mean, Mr. Buchanan . 4eartity -adopts it! Let that be nememberedi These it:S(4l4lons, and .Mr. , Buchanan's acceptance of them,inay be found in the speech of the Hon. J. Glancy Jones,' mernher of Congress frony Pennsylvania,ite , livered in the 1-1 ouse of Representative, May .. 13th, 1851... __ ._ • s L - e He who 'has noted the progress of the Pernoeratie party for the last few yenrs,and ; has discovered - who are its leading spirits, or: has observed its deflections and gradual ten,' dents Southward and taiggerwakd, might on the -morni ' ng of April 28, 1856, if he. kid . . . seen the Rielutiond (Va.) Enquirer," have safelv-predited that the Cincinnati Platform ; would eontaiff the doctrine of State Equali ty, though he might not -then' ; have known what it; Meant. The following editorial is front- that paper : . Prom the Ric hmond Enquirer, April, -28, 1856. " Tim. "Crscirsrtt Cosvasnoi.—An entirely - new 'min will be presented in the approaching Presiden. Oil eanvarrin issue which it is impossible to avoid or evade. The opposition is essentially an Abolition Party. It Otos& to repeal the Kaniars Nebraska act and the Fugitsvi,Slave law. 'lt thereby denies State Equality., The Democracy oppose the repeal of those laws, and seria thereby to uutintaik.Stato Equality.— : But all room for doubt or cavil must be removed.- ire must, in Me' eMeirMati Platform, REPUDIATE Squatter Sot4o.eignty; and expreitsly', assert STATE EQUALITY.I We mast - declare that it is the duty of the General Government to see that no invidious or injurious cfirdine,tions arejnade &Owen the PEO PLE or the PROPERTY of differen4 sections, in the Territories. We do not mean to dictate.: Itmay be that.the assertion in the Platform of the abstract prop "(lkb:in of State Equality may sulficei to carry along with it the consequences which we desire. But it is often charged, that the Kansas 7 Nebraska bill contains the daetrinA . of Squatter Sovereiguty,:and that Bysta:— ler Sogereigftry it' die min ' ffflaelli agent of Nee *SOW aut. Some A.ok ha m i 'Pomocratil have nutitttoined this ground. .ROW, - THIS GUN MUST BE SPIKED. It must akicar ftoln onr-rjatform t that we mffutain practical Stale EqualitA and reinrdiate that construe. don of the Kansas-Nebraska act which - would defeat it. The South may demands equality:" of rights f . 'No "insidioui or injuriouS: distinctions:" . be all id bet . • must ow . o eon the :people or the property 'of aaeriEti' sections—in other words, the,sisiteholOr , must he atria to go :into the; TiiiiiPries withYls " niggere,-- for that is *hit they mean ; at' the - &nthby property—the same as the man ft•oto, itt.,Noitti is allowed to go with hiitorse'iir his wagon . , '. . 6 .-:rlE'gclon: - "k' Ise,there would be an ""invidious" and " injurious distinction." „And, to terry out the,, doctrine, the some unbopded_dib erty mist givek tbe slave-owner. to tale his: chattels into the 'Free Atatei, iii spite of iltxtat laws and Conrt'de4tons,Ot ke set up "odious," "invidious,'' and injuri ous" distinctions between - tlie.:people and " property" , iof _diffeOnt sections! This is State Equalit.V—" tire equal rights of all the States." . tint let its see. if it is to be ,timind in the 011Cillhati • In the :kJ 'eetion of tln Ist resolution of that Maffei-in we read: That:bythe uttiforta:npplic eratic principlel to the organiza to the athnissioh of new States . - ine_qtic filiCery,!na they':: mar RIGHTS OF ALL THE TAT Intact " And, nga'n in Owd " A liigh and sacred duty • i Democratic parts of this;count Union, to uphold and maintain ERY STATE, and tbereny the Yoo know the Sonthern PropaLtandists of the " Peculiar institution"... -3y, if they can't have their " - equal rights," State Equality„or the right to !carry tlpir slaves whet'ever a Northern man ntavi ' carr . ,.• his horse, they will (Xissavel the :rnion.l. The Democratic party,leing, the ‘ll7iiion pirty,'.of 'Course it " devOlVes' lupon it . ito *rant- them these "rights;,' , an thus; save the Union. Thegoe trine Of Stat F.fivalitY, A.< h perec is-c, is con tainedin thel Cincinnati - P atforni in 'words sufficiently plain to lie t. ula 1 nstoocl by the in , itiated=as the Iliehrnon •I!l:nquirer' said. f .,' to Carry along with- it. :which we destre"- 7 -yet in s such connect ion 'as not. . tentioilor e.x .l rite the Sitspi`4. acquatitted with its its meal , • hear vfbat this same- Richl though,t, about it, after - tl, made. !: One of its Editors icnded:the t . .,inireation as 1. ginia,and - se - ed as Clic of it mediately a v er the 4rloptit he sent hornt4 his ,paper' resoktitions, whidt werepul, ing . itlitorialOOttne 6, IS, witrZthe foll Owing pointtd •. "'With the tmost pOssible re Fig of language, these resolution. talluiticiples,rs.t,tof the Gosst:s„of SLAVER ; and secondly, ,., • OF T,HE STAT. ..7, with respect f.. dignity and po i ideal rights. I couchismve terms the doctrine nf 1y is 4EPUDI ATED h, sl, Di. crane hart L et, . ~...,. it.be borne in mind tlliat, the IZielifilond EriPirer is the great . leading; standard organ of thb Dollocratie Tarty: in the Southern lv:StateS; that it not only reflects the sentiments of the party et the South, lint gives to it tone 'and ,direction ; it is the Great" Dictator and Grand Mogul of the paitY. - . •And let it be further borne in M ind, that' it is the boast of the: Demociatio:party everywhere,-that its sentiments are the same. North ttmot.Bouth.' ' The ; party papers throughout the Southern States echo the sentiments Of theiliehmond - Zirpitrer. boldly,. while a the ,North, and West they_ do the same •as far as they dare. NO Democratic paper of a y note has dared to I deny or controvert its °shims, nor will • any duly.' The Democr cy of the Sandi ntayjie regarded as the . etnueracy of: the natiqn r for it Dot . only constitutes fUlly two, thirds of the entire party, but has for years given . to it shape and direction' as well ,as PlatOoms. I The party hi in,g, according to its onve government, exelu itely "national," it Must, of necessity be tli same North that ti ll it is soutii. i The Ricbmou Enguirer being, therefore,, the standarl org of the:•-party, I choose to qt ote front it in preference to oth er papers, ,itonching poin, s of doctrine or questions . Or' . party . policy. 1 It can hardly be Supposed that. this paper can be ini;daketi as :to - what is the true) issue in the cauvass-wli at its meant by State Equalitywhether . it is I l eontained in the Cincinnati Platform—and i:... hat is Mr.lluehanan's potiition in regard to the ;same. -; To settle the . question, then, shomilmlititere still be any doubt, as to whether' the Platfurrn contains ihe doctrine, I quote. again upon that pvint, Frani the Richmond Enquirer of 4 kgast 27, I 556. "CAN ANY I ,Socrtteus NAN I. trey ?—lt jg A 11119,1 a work of supererogation to offer further proofs upon the entire soundness of Jambs Buchanan upon the question of the ronatitutielital rights ff the South. The issue lia4 been fully made, and upon. argumermt the South lueirdecided to Grit ter votes for the Cin cinnati nominee.s, whose past I isterysind present at-' fitude show' them to i* thann ghly reliable. What -Teasel) is there for the. heory tl. • t Buchanan is a `seer: lionel' candidate, 'should the w mole : South go for him? HE STANDS I.7k)N .A PLATFaII F TIIE lIQUA.LITY OF TIIE STATES, and of full and exact justice to every §ectiOn of the Union.. The Pi tform and the candid ates were adepted by the Note of,the .united Democ 7 racy representing every distri tof every -State of the trier. The Pernocratie ithrty islthe only party that maintains THE' SAME GROUND - in'• every State of the Union. 1 The GREAT -FETURES of the Dern -4.1 -ocratic PLATFORM, which J c,s Buchanan has me- LT AND SQUAP.ELY EsnousEn, nd of which he is a fair *unoontENr, arc the EQLAL RIGHTS OF ALL TLl$ STATES, and 'sections—the quicitinq of the Anti-Slcireil( excitement, andhe guardians* of the . boner and interest of the platen." Having shown-that .th • doctrine - of State Eqtzality is in the Cinci nati Platform,' and th4,Mr. Buchanan fully a utsquirely endors es ii.; I proceed to show what it is, and that it deo, aces to the statements of its own' friends; constitute, the issne. I 'have said that the South 'demands the right, wader the Con. ablution,' to carri , their slates wherever •ei Northern plan . .may. citrr what is regarded property in the Free Staes. Let me make that gool:41 I quote now fr m a speech publish ed tot the l ' Charleston Me cury,'_(S. C.,) April 19; WO, and deliVered i ihe House ofAcp resentatites, April 7, 18 ~by . the. Hon. :L. M. Keitt, ,M. C., from outh Carolina. 'lt may also be found! in- the ' Congressional Globe' of April 8. ,He is speaking,,,•of the .1. Presidential.", contest!' ' "Sir, the next contest will It will turn Upon the question constitutierial-rights of ate St establish in . the Platform tt - MOAT OF A pOIITITERN VAN Td ITSIENOTII Jan BILKADTiI, XN I ZAN MAN TO Ws nonsE. She nition of thCiight full, coral This is what is meant You pirceive be sayse the lish thia doctrine in the F . the South dictate what sh OCRATiC P:LATFCII3II3 I Ph cinnatil Xotice also t claimed under the Cosi to this, I quota fratn an ei V i nton and ATEIF4I6I4 3 ,pt Tennesaeik May „17 1 11 speilia4 or 4 discuss ion o'; : gila. l 7:- . -A:la'AiiH . 1T'..'0, - RAV'EP.v...AV:j: _.-.•nbi'AlOi...'9. i • 1\10: r ' 1 ROSE,:: Tfri*p..B.l 7 , - . ocToji* .().:; 1856,. Lakin of this Demo `tun of ferthories and with or without. do cket, the EQUAL will he preserved elution devOlved ormn the as the pally of the he RIMITS OF EV - - Union of the States." -1 the eklnsequences lueli language and iro.nttract th at-, ion of thoSe unz viint4 -. 2- llnt let us t ninnl: ' Enquirer' I o'Platform was pir'.. Ritchie) at )elegate &mit Vir- . 4 Secretaries. Inst n ofthe Platform_, is three principal i lished in the lead-. rio,'accompanie.d statement ?...,. reelslon and etapha s aflirni the 'great:Vl- TIiTTIONAL lIVAIIAN. .of the EQUALITY to their .Forercign i equally clear and &limiter Sorcreipt furin (if ate liphio- 'le a momentous one. of SLAVERY, and the tinst/t. The South should :e principle, THAT. THE HIS ELATE 15 EQritL, 121 E RIGHT Oka, "NoExu should make the reco ete, and Indisputable, 1 , STATE EQEALTTT. South should estab latfure. ..Does nut all• go into the Dia d it not de iota Cia .l at this " rightrls 1 Trrros. Apropos itorial in the h-D_aity frWished iNooh-va kJ. - l'fio,‘ XliY l '. :is d in. the State Leg-. isisture, a shart time preiious, on the - Slavery ;question., Hear him "Messrs. Daily, 'Smith, iAil others, went so far as to assert, in effect, that Slowly' could, only be ear- rich where it is protector by focaf_, legislation; which is in DIRECIKDENIAt TA; ricersurs or THY SOUTH, THAT Ella CONSTITUTION co TICE UNITED STATES recognises Slavery, andtßpriocti t 7 WREREVER TtIAT IIidTRUMENT RsrEiDl.Ticeit are AtCtS, hard, stub, born facts, white no ingenuity fanevade, or sophist ry. i)er " Vert. • Does not, " that instrument extend" over the - Free States, as well as over 'the Slave states ? And, if so, does it not, according to this doctrine, " reciktniie" • and ' " protect" Shivery as . ..well and is completely in Ohio, ma ss a c hns e it s , or Pennsylvania, its it does in Vir g ini a , South Caroina, or Louisiana? Who can deny it? Y:et thts is _precisely. whA the advocates of s tate lEt r ality contend for. Yield tolliern in their demands; estahligt the doctrine Apt . .. State": Dinality as the doe: , trine of the Constitution 'and the, policy of this grovernMent, and. tbty so 4 show you whether they enimot br;i,!* their slaves , into your midst. eallltla - 4 roil in the shade of Bunker Mill. Monument, or then 61 . (4A- Mg throUgh Iho fields (?f'fitiriok I\ 7 li:k.t of your Stine 1a vs and 'Col:e4titutions.! It they "conflict" with the COli , titution of the linked States, yon :innst niter =thorn. Tliere must be no " invidious", or i` injurious distinctions !" And this,' yon.nre told,• is THE DOCTRINE OF THE SOETH,. , How long. let the ask, till it it will bb " the doctrine" of the tional De- mocrary,