Till; INDIAN WAB. Interesting statement* from Official Tiic (ollowStiKfr-cfs li.ive been COmpUcd from official ocuments. Although nht new,, they torow light on recent transactions in the Indian c 7)n t Sc I,lth of March last Major-General Han cock addressed a letter to Colonel Wynkoop, for the Cheyennes, Apaches, and Arapa- S at Fort Larncd, Kansas, in which ho says : “I'liavc the honor to send you this communi catlon for the purpose of informing you that 1 hTve about completed my arrangements to move aforce to the plains, and only await a proper condition of the roads to march.; , ,• <‘My object in making ah expedition at this time is to show the Indians within the limits of. this Department that wo are able to ebaatise any tribes who may molest people who. are traveling SrosVtherS. It is not my desire to bring difficulties with the Indians; but to treat them with iustlce and according to our treaty stipula tions and x desire especially in toy dealings with them to act through their agents as lar as piact.- Cl 'o l ln reference to the Cheyennes of yonr agency, - r mav rav that we have just nfVrievar.cel One is that they have not delivered up’the murderer of the New Mexican at /arah. I also believe that 1 have evidence sufficient to fix upon different bands ot that tribe wfcotc chie:s are known, several ot-tlie out rages committed on the Smoky ltd last summer '•‘i request that you will iniorrn them, m such a manner as you may think proper, that I ex pect shortiv to visit their neighborhood, and that T will be efad to have an interview with their chiefs: and tell them also, if you please, that I go fully prepared for peace or war, and that hereafter I will insist upon their keeping oil the main lines of travel, where their presence is cal culated to bring about a collision with the whites. »lf you can prevail upon the Indians of your agency to abandon-their habit of intestmg the country traversed by our overland routes, thieat ening. robbing and intimidating travelers, we xill refer that matter to you. II noWi would he pleased by your presence with me when I visit the locality of your tribes, to show that the oth cers of the government are acting in harmony. Major 11. Douglass, under date ol March 11 tig writes to Major Henry E. Noyes; ’I have re ceived from Little Raven, head chief of the Arap.aboes, a message to the eifcct that no mmc wood must be cut b'v this command on the 1 a\v nee Fork, and that the troops must move out of the country by the time grass grows. Mr. Jones, the interpreter at this post, brought me a message from Sutanta, the principal ehiet ol the Kiowas, to ti:e eli'ect that (ill white men must move east of Council Grove by the spring; that he gave mo ten days to move from tins post: that, he’wanted the mules and cavalry horses iattenert, as he would have use for them and intended to appropriate them: that all the Indians-Lad agreed to slop the railroads ami roads at Council Grove; Unit no roads or railroads would lie allowed west of that point. Major J. 11. Page,, fid luiantrv brori'dit me a message from the, same duel: •loti the chiefs on’ the road that they must gather their soldiers and leave; ii they don't, 1 will help them to leave; no wagons will be allowed on the road except those that bring presents; if any are found they will be taken.’ .. “Subsequently, in council, Satauta stated m substance the same, but.not in an.insulting man ner, which lias already been reported to district headquarters. . , . , ' “It has been reported to me that eight Arapa hoes, apparently friendly, stopped on the tenth inst., at the camp »f a Mr. Gilchrist, a wagon master for a Mr. Wedcllo, ot Moro, New Mexico, on the other side of Fort Aubnev (120 miles from here), Bhot at the herder, and ran off forty head of mules and one mare.” ■ „ J. H. Leavenworth, Indian agent for the Ca munches and Kiowas, in a letter dated Fort Lamed, Kansas, April 9, to the Commis sioucr of Indian affairs, says ‘ I arrived at Fort Zarah, Kansas, on the 3d insL Gen.: Hancock on the sth instant with his -whole command, consisting of artillery, cavalry and infantry, about 1,500 strong. I immediately called uponJiim and requested information as to the objects of his movements so far as related to’ the Indians ol my ngenev, viz.: the Camanches and Kiowas. He very kindly and promptly fur aidhed us with the inclosed papers, marked num bers 1, 2 and 3. As none of the Indians of my agency have visited this great line of travel, ex very few, since they received their annuity a last October, and. as it was uncertain what n of his department he might visit with his command, he expressed a wish that I would ac company him, and as I believed it to be eminently -proper, I willingly consented, and should any thing occur concerning the Indians of my agency, or the interest Of the Indian Department gene rally, I shall make full report of the same.” One of the letters above referred to from Gen. Hancock acquaints Colonel Wynkoop that ills object in preparing an expedition to the plains is to convince the Indians that we are able to punish any of them who may molest travelers across the plains, or who may commit, otlujr hostilities against the whites. "We,” he says, “desire to avoid “any troubles with-the Indians, and to treat them with justice and according to the requirements of treaties witli them, and I ■wish, especially in my dealings with them, to act through the agents of the Indian Department, as far as it is possible to do so. Concerning the Kiowas of your agency, we have grave reasons for complaint. Among others, it is officially re ported to these be.ad. and mail routes, I think it important to put a stop to their whole sale plundering. I propose building posts in their country, as that demoralizes them more than anything else, except money and whisky.” Among the documents is a letter from Major- General Hancock, dated Fort Leavenworth, Kun eas, July 31, 18C7, addressed to Headquarters of the Army of the United States, in which he says he haß the honor to acknowledge the receipt of certain communications named by him, and con tinues: “In reply to the letters of Cols. Wynkoop and Leavenworth, herein referred to, and to a telegram, dated May 23,1807, from Gen. Grant, upon the subject of the burning of the Indian vil lages on Pawnee Fork, April It), 1807, I have the honor to submit the following statement, first premising that I huve replied to Gen. Grant's tele gram of Slay 23 by a telegram of the same date, and that,in my official report of the operations of the expedition made last spring to the plains, undo; my command, forwarded to Gen. Grant by Lieut.-Gen. Sherman, a full and accurate history is given of the objects of that expedition, and the military movements connected with it, together with nay reasons for destroying the villages of the Sioux and the Cheyennes on Pawnee Fork, etc. The report in question touches upon all the main points mentioned in the copies ol the from Colonels Wyhkoon and Leavenworth, re ferred to me by General Grant, May 23,18G7, and is believed to be sufficiently full in details to cover the questions mentioned therein; yet there are a few statements niadc ihjome of them which are inaccurate. and /which I desire to correct. Thcy arc as follows „r nnn Among tholettcrs inclosed is a copy *om-Oaonel-AVyokOop, dated. March 11, ISbV statins that “Wilson Graham, the Cheyenne boy «hn won eantnrcd from that tribe some time since is now on his way to this post (Fort Riley). Is soon as he arrives lie will bo sent to you, m ordci that be may be delivered to bis nearest relatives Please inform this office of the name and ba*d of his nearest relatives.’ i “Vo authority was over given by me tothfj com manding ollicer of the District ot the Upper Ar kansas to transfer the child in question to any nmit of the Indian Department whatever. On the contrary, I informed the commanding officer at. Fort 'Lamed (through headquarters District ot tkc-'Uupor Arkansas); in a. letter dated at these headquarters 11 th of March, 18(17, (copy inclosed, marked A,) that the boy in .question (who was under ray charge at Fort Leavenworth) woulurb.o. sent to that post (Fort Lamed) for delivery to bis nearest relatives, and that he had been ob tained from the persons who had had possession Of him since his capture through the exernou ot the military authorities. . This action on my part being in accordance with the instructions I hod received on that subject from headquarters Mili tary District of Missouri, in a special order dated St. Louis, Mo., February 2::, 18U7, (copy inclosed marked II.) The bov being too uuwel to travel as soon as was anticipated, I detained him here until I started with the expedition to the plains, (March 2,’>) when he accompamfcd me and was delivered by me personally to the commanding ollicer at Fort Lamed, leaving with him the iol lowiug instructions: ‘HrAnqI'ARTKRS Dm-AP.TMKNT OK Till;. Mrs snrim.NKAK For.T Larskiv, Kansas, April 12. y-„ tin Cvmwimdinri tijjkcrof Fort. Lamed, Kamar. —Sue On leaving'this camp it is the inten tion of the Major-General commanding lo jphK-e in your charge the Cheyenne boy nowin his possession, known by the name ot Wilson Graham. You will retain him until an opportunity presents for delivering him to his nearest relatives. His mother is said to u" living, believed to belong to the Black Kettle I,and.' When you deliver him to his relatives, you will take a receipt lor him. ‘I am. sir. very respectfully, ‘Your obedient servant, (Signed) ‘W. G. Mnviim.i., ‘Captain and Acting Ass. Adt.-Genenu. “In a conversation which I had with Colonel Wynkoop on the subject, while I was at tort Lamed, 1 informed him that my instillations re quired me to deliver the boy to the nearest rein lives through the military authorities, and not through the Indian ageuts. ’ copy of a letter from Colonel Leavenworth, United Stales Indian Agent lor the CatnangUes and Kiowas. to Hon, N. G. Taylor, Commissioner of Indian'Affairs, dated April !>, 1887, states tha*. he (Col. Leavenworth) was directed, by instruc tions from the Indhiu Bureau, to proceed to St. bonis to receive from Lieutenant-General bher mam Wilson Graham, the Cheyenne hoy in ques tion,' and to deliver him to 1 Col. Wvukoop, at Fort Lamed. Upon his arrival at St. Louis. Lieutenant-General Sherman informed him that the chilli had been sent to me, with instructions to deliver him to the Cheyennes, in the presence of tlie agent. These instructions would have been carried out .while I was present at Fort Larudd had the band of Cheyennes lo which his relatives belonged (Black Kettle) been in that country at that, time. It was reported to be tu Texas, and 1 left the boy with the commanding qflicer at Fort Lamed’, jvith the instructions before referred to. ' “Shortly after that time (April L>) the Chey ennes commenced the present war against ns, which has thus far rendpred the, delivery of the boy to his friends impracticable. • ■ “in the letttr of Colonel-Wynkoop, dated at my headquarters on Pawnee Fort, April 18,188 addressed to Hon. N. G. Taylor, Commissioner ot Indian Affairs, he states that a courier .had ar rived in my camp from General Custer (then in pursuit of the Sioux and Cheyennes from Pawnee Fork), with the intimation that, the Cheyennes had turned and gone toward the Arkansas river, while the Sioux had continued northward. They followed the Sioux trail, and the last despatch from him (General Custer) is to the effect that the Bioux, upon crossing the Smoky Hill road, had destroyed a moil station and killed three men.” x “Colonel Wvnkoop then goes on to state that as there was no evidence of the Cheyennes ha v ini? committed &dv overt act of hostility, he made nn appeal to me to preserve the village belong ing to that tribe, as it was distinct from the Sioux There is no evidence in General Custer s reports of his pursuit of the Sioux and Chey ennes from the village of Pawnee Fork which would go to prove that they had separated, or that the Cheyennes were not implicated in the killing and burning of the three men at Lookout station on the loth of April, and burning of the station. Oil the contrary, in General Custer s report to Brevet-Major General A. J. Smith, commanding District of the Upper Arkansas, ot April It) (received after the destruction ol the villa.t, and too late to.be considered in this con nection), in reference to the outrage at Lookout station, on the Smoky Hill, he'saysexpressly that after a careful examination they, himself and the Delaware scouts, who were with him, it was .found impracticable to discover the slightest clue as to what tribe had committed the act; but says in his report to General Smith of the 17th ot April, (copv inclosed marked 1),) that the out rages were certainly committed by the Indians who abandoned the village on Pawnee Fork.. They were a portion of the same body ol Uidi anSA about . eight hundred , strong, I hey; crossed the Smoky HUT road on the Kith of- April, and reported themselves to be Sioux, Cheyennes and Vaunces.. They were all stripped aiul painted for war at that lime, aud in addition to tdo previous killing and burning at Lookout Station, they tired iuto Stormy Hollow mail station, and ran oil stock from that point belonging to the mail company, threatened the mail station cast of Stormy Hol low, and ran off stock belonging to the Union Pacific Railroad E. D., a few nilles further north. “My official report of the operations of the ex pedition of last spring shows conclusively that 1 did not determine to destroy the Indian villages, until I hud learned officially of the outrage com mitted on Smoky Hill by the Indians (Sioux and Cheyennes), who had treacherously left then camps on Pawnee Fork on the lltli oi April, or during the previous night. “In none of the reports which were received from Gen. Custer of bis pursuit of the Indians from Pawnee Fork was there any facts going to show that tlio main body of the Choyonnes had left the Sioux and gone south. _AU of the infor mation contained iu the desp,Etches of .General Custer at that time was to the effect that the In dians from Pawnee Fork (Sioux and Cheyennes) remained together (with probably a few excep tional small bands) until they arrived at the Smoky Hill, when they committed the murderfl and depredations on the' mail stations, and then pursued their tlight‘northwards.’ “In reference to the statement of Col. AVyn koop that the village of the Cheyennes was dis tinct from that of the Sioux, I can only say that the villages stood upon the same ground, aud I was nnable, after an inspection which 1 made in person, to distinguish with -imy.-gertaiuty the lodges of the Choyemies from’tliose of the Sioux, nor could any of the officers who were with me say positively where the line of separation be tween the villages commenced, although it was understood that the Sioux were on the north side und the Cheyennes on the southern and eastern “it is not seen on what grounds the Indians became fully Impressed with the belief that Gen. Hancock had come for the purpose of murdering thl-ir women and children, as had been previously done at Land Creek (Sec same letter from Col. Wynkoop to Hon. N. G. Taylor, of April Bth, 18ti7.) Nothing which I said to the Sioux and Cheyenne chiefs, whom I had met at Lnrned on the 12th of April, or at the meeting near the vil lages on the 11th of that month, could have led the Indians to bucli a conclusion, or have given them apprehensions of such murderous inclina tions on my part, for I had certainly assured them that my intentions were pacific, and that I had only marched into their country for the pur pose of having a conference with the different tribes, so that they might have a full and just un derstanding of, the views and intentions of the military authorities in reference !to their future conduct aud their inteilereuee with the railways and other routes of travel, emigrants passing through their country, and the treatment of our irontiersettlers. “SuraTvere well known to Colonels Wynkoop and Leavenworth to be the objects of the expe dition, and they constantly assured tho Indians, when in my presence, that my intentions were peaceful, and it was not until after'the hostilities on iho Smoky Hill subsequent to their abandon ment oi the village on Pawnee Fork, which com pelled me to destroy their village, that the as- THE riAIl-V EVENING BULLETIN.— PHILADELPHIA, MONDAY; SEPTEMBER 2 1867. eertionswcre made that the Indiana had actually been forced into a war (seo Colonel Wynkoope letter of April 21, to tho Hon.N. G-. Taylor,Com missioner of Indian Affairs). Whllo on this sub ject, it is proper to stato that none know bettor than Colonels Wynkoop and; toavenworth. did not march to the plains .lost spring for the purpose of commencing a war with the Indians, lor before my departure irom Fort Leavenworth, I had written to* them iitformiug them of my' in structions. and of the expedition, and stating that no Indians would bo arreßted or e«l ed t 0 account by me for past outrages and depreda tions, unless upon theWppUcntion of tho agents of A p r p 21 and 21, the first from Fort Dodge, the latter from Fort Lamed, Colonel Wynkoop reiterates the statement tnut the vilhm-c of the Cheyennes, on Pawnee Fork, was burned without provocation or any overt acts on the part of that tribe, notwithstanding he must surely have known when lie was at Fort Dodge with me, from the reports which I had received from General Custer, tho con touts of which were made known to him (and these were the only possible sources of information at that time), that the Cheyennes generally'had not gone south of tho Arkansas when they deserted the village at Pawnee Fork, hut had lied north of the Pniokv Hill with! the Sioux, and wore parties with tho.latter to tho murders and burning at Lookout Station, and tho other outrages com mitledon the-Smoky Hill about the same time. “I consider the evidence ns to the participa tion of the Cheyennes in the, massacre of Look out station.and other depredations on tho Smoky ' Hill, after they had abandoned the villugc on Pawnee Fork, contained in General Custer’s re ports of his pursuit of the Clieyonnes and Sioux, conclusive and beyond ipiestiou, their conduct 011 that occasion beiug, in my opinion, only a con tinuation of the outrages which they hail been previously committing against the whites in tins department ever since 1 have assumed the com mand of it (August, 18(10). ' “To show the temper of the Cheyennes towards us, and the feelings of hostility wbicli animated them (before the expedition to the plains of last Spring). I inclose herewith there ports of former outrages perpetrated last summer and fall, with evidence, which it is considered fixes the guilt oi these outrages upon that tribe beyond any ques tion or doubt, viz.: “September lit,180(1. —A party of Indians ran oil fourteen horses and two mules from Fort Wallace (see copy of a report from Lieutenant Flood. oth U S. Volunteers, inclosed, marked K; also an endorsement on a report' of Lieutenant Joseph Hale, dated November 10, 1800, inclosed,marked K 2; also copy of an affidavit of-Hr. H. P. Wyatt, Oil the same subject marked E 3; copy of atli davil of .Mr. Win. Comstock, government guide and interpreter at Ton-Wallace, marked E -I, and eopV of statement of Mr. .John Smith, L. S. In dian Interpreter, marked E-i.) , “September 20, IstJt;.— I Two employes ol the Overland Mail Company murdered at Chalk | lilutl's mail station. As evidence showing that, ] the murders were committed by the Cheyenne:.. I transmit copies of a letter from Mr. D. Street, agent ol'the Overland Mail Company, marked l i. dated October 23, ISO'!, of an affidavit from Mr. William'Comstock, V. S. Guide and Interpreter at Fort Wallace, marked IC -1, ol an afhduvitjrom Mr .James Wadsworth, driver on the Overland Mail Line, marked F 2, of a letter from Captain W. M. Koogh, Ttb Cavalry, commanding Post Fort Wallace, dated December 20, lhtiil, marked F 3, with inclosure of a letter from Lieut. Joseph Hale, 3d- Infantry, dated December' 19, 1800, marked FI. , , .. “October 12,180(1.—A band of Indians burned the mail station at Chalk Bluils. I invite atten tion to the following papers, before referred to, (inclosed herewith,) fixing that outrage upon the Chevennes: Letter from Lieutenant Joseph Hale, 3d Infantry, dated November 10, 18(10; letter of October -,3,- 0800, from Mr. D. Street, agent Overland Mail Company, and a letter from Lieutenant Hale, 3d Infantry', dated .December 19,1800. , , . , “November 10,1806.—An unprovoked murder of a New Mexican was committed at Fort Zarh, by a Cheyenne* Fox Tall, a son of Medicine Ar row, a prominent man 01 that tribe. (See on this subject the inclosed copy of a report from Second Lieutenant J. B. Thompson, 3d Infantry, marked G. That murder has never been denied by the Cheyennes. ~ „ , , , , “1 also inclose a copy of a statement marked H, from Mr. John Smith, United States Indian interpreter, dated July 11, 1807, in reference to the killing of six white men by the Cheyennes In the month of June, 1860, on one of the tributaries of Solomon’s Fork; and a copy of a letter dated February 22, 1807, from-Mr. F. K. Page, United States agent for the Kansas Indians (marked I), stating that, about the Ist day of January, 1807, a part of the Cheyennes attacked the Kaw chief Katiaugnh, capturing forty-four horses and wounding one man, 1... have. also on record at my headquarters the official report of various outrages and depredations committed before the present war by other tribes belonging to the agencies of Colonels Wynkoop and Leavenworth. Arapahocs, Kiowas and Ca inanclies, some of which the Indians themselves, when in council with me last spring, acknow legded to have been justly charged to them: The reports in all such eases were promptly reported bv me to the Indian Department as soon its they were received, and though I had constantly in formed the department through the agents that I was ready to assist them with the troops under mv command in arresting the olleudcrs, I have never in a single instance been called upon to to render sucli assistnuce, and in all cases (even in that of the murderer of the New Mexican, at Zara, when the the culprit was known) the guilty ones have been -.it.-'- A vu punished.” ■“Colonel Wynkoop’s letterof April 21 also con tains the following: „ , , ‘I have just arrived with General nancock s column at this post (Fort Dodge), and learn? since my arrival here a few days ago, that six Cheyenne Indians, on foot, were attacked by one hundred and thirty-five cavalry, about twenty five miles west of this post, and all of them killed. I also lcani that they had done nothing to provokc'ah attack, but were oi the party that had lied before llafleock’s approach.’ “In reply to this passage, I will merely quote that portion of mv official report which referred to this matter. It contains the facts which I drew from the report of the late Maj. W. Cooper, 7th cavalry, who commanded the detachment which had the encounter at the Cimmeron Cross ing with the Indians referred to in Colonel Wynkoop’s letter. On my arrival there (Fort Dodge), I learned that, on the 19th Inst. (April), a party of Cheyennes, evidently runners from the north, had approached the Cimmeron Crossing, and were dis covered skulking around the bivouac of a detach ment of the Ttli cavalry, which was at that point, under command oi Major VVicklifi' Cooper, 01 that regiment. When the Indians were perceived, they were endeavoring to steal up to some herders, who were in charge of the’ cattle .of the command, and it is supposed they wore not aware of the presence of the troops. Major Cooper di rected Lieutenant Berry, of the 7th cavalry, with twenty men, to advance and demand their sur render, which was done through an interpreter. In reply the Indians fired upon the troops. They were attacked and pursued across the river, and six of them (all that-were seen) were killed. _ One of our men was wounded and one horse killed. I also herewith transmit a copy of Colonel W. Cooper’s report of tho affair, marked K. “In concluding this letter it is proper for me to say again that before the expedition of last Epring set out I informed agents Wyukoop and Leavenworth fully of its objects, telling them that war was not intended against the Indians, and that it was my earnest desire to act through them in alt matters eonuectcd-with the tribes under their agencies. I nltfo invited them to accompany me on my marqhj from Fort Lamed to Fort Dodge, so that they might ho present at my interviews with tho chiefs of the various tribes, and hear what I had to say to them. “During the time they were in my camps they must have observed that all of my conferences were with a view of preserving peace on the plainß, and all of my actions friendly, but the treachery of the Sioux and Cheyennes at Pawnee Fork, and the murders and depredations com mitted by them on the Smoky Ilill route, after they ran away from tho village, compelled me to take hostile measures against them. - “It is worthy of remark in this connection, that while in my camp Colonol Leavenworth stated to me in conversation that the tribes of his agency had been greatly wronged by having been charged with various offences which had been committed by the Indians of Colonel Wynkoop’s agency (Cheyennes, Arapuhoes, and Apaches). ; In the opinion of Colonel Leavenworth, as ex pressed to me,|tho Indians of Colonel Wynkoop’s agency, especially the Cheyennes, deserved severe and summary punishment for their numerous misdeeds, very rnaDy of which had been laid at the door of his innocent tribes (the Camanchcs undKiowas). "But Colonel Wynkoop informed me, in con versation, about the same timd, that the Arapa hoes, Apaches, and especially tho Cheyennes,; were really peacefully inclined, and rarely com-, mitted bfleheea against tho'lawsthut moat unfor tunately, they were charged with crimes which had been perpetrated by other tribes, and that in this respect they had suffered most , heavily from the Jtiowas, of Colonel Leavenworth’s agency, who were tiie most turbulent Indians- on the plnins, and deserved punishmont moro than any others. More recent events have shown that all the tribes above referred to (savo, probably, a portion of the. Oninnnclies), including the Sioux tribe, determined upon a general outbreak this summer, and that the abandonment of the village on Pawnee Fork and the murders committed immediately afterwards on the Smoky Hill were but the commencement of a war. which had been threatened to our post commanders on many oc-, casions during tho winter, and whieh'is now waged with savage fury on the part ol the In dians throughout my command and the Depart 'ment of the Platte and Dakotah. ... “In reference to the threats made last winter by the Indians, of war against us this summon; I transmit herewith, marked L 1 and L copies ot two communications Irom Major ,11. Douglas, commanding post-of Fort Hodge, which concerns particularly the Kiowas and Arapahoes. One ol the letters is addressed to the Assistant Adjutant General, Department of the Missouri, the other to the Acting Assistant Adjutant General, District ol the Upper Arkansas. I also transmit a copy ol a letter from brevet Major jAsbury, 3d lnlautry, bearing on this subject, marked L 3. “Tills reply to the statemeiits of Colonels Wynkoop and Leavenworth, contained in the copies ol the letters referred to me by order ot General Grant, May 23, would have been trans mitted promptly after the date of their receipt, but for the fact that since that time, until the loth inst., I have been cojustautly ou the plains, marching almost every day, which prevented me from giving my attention to the matter until the present moment. , " 0 "Owing to the absence ot Mr: John Smith, L. S. Indian interpreter, L have withheld two ol bis affidavits, marked 11, until his-return, believing that an error was committed by him 111 giving the name of one of the bands ot Indians at tiie time of writing them, which can then be cor rected. They will then be transmitted lor file with this communication. Herewith 1 return the originals of tiie papers referred to me by General-Grant, May “IS, for my remarks. “I am. Major, very respectfully:, "Your obedient servant. “Wixrrm.n e>. 11am im k. . "Major-General V. S. A.. Commanding.” (;cs. siciiiifcs’s keiHovai... Opinion of tlic Acting Atiorney ffciicraJ. Acting. Attorney-General Hinckley has ftir • Shifted the PresidonUi long opi uio»-.;ou U1C...1.C: moral of General Sickles from eomimitnl ill North Carolina, on account ot his order eontiictiiig with the process and judgments of the United States courts in that Slate. The Acting Attor nev-Gcncral's opinion is very lengthy and tech nical. reviewing all the facts in the ease, and citing Chancellor Kent, Judge Story, the l\A ■ ulist and the Constitution to show the power and, sphere of die Judiciary. The acts of Congress creating the various judiehd-eireuits and districts are also quoted, and the opinion continues ,us follows: ~ . , „ . The "judicial power of the l mted States is a unit. In the constitution it is mentioned in the singular' number, and the reasoning ol the Supreme Court in the ca6o of Martin vs. Hunter, is to tiie effect that so much of it as the .Con stitution left Congress to vest in inferior courts was incapable of segregation, and consequently vested as~ a whole in the judicial establishment. (1 Wheaton, 380.) As a power, then, it is to be conceived of as omnipresent within its con stitutional sphere, nhd consequently, with respect to the dignity of lawful judicial process, the source of the same is not of the least signifi cance, and the laws forbidding obstruction of it make accordingly no distinction- The contumacy, therefore, which would be more vulgar if offered to a writ held in the hand of the Chief Justice of -the Supreme Court, would, in respect to the consolidated judicial power and dignity, he of the same legal quality as if the like writ was despised in the hands et the humblest servant of a court of the lowest grade in the system. ► Thus much as to the paramount authority of the judiciary in all matters to which their power Is extended by the Constitution, acting through the courts and officers who arc the organs of the power. To resist that power anywhere and in anv manner, within its constitutional sphere, is to resist the whole of it, and to aspire to an issue with the judicial department of the govern- occur to some minds that if this power over tlie subject matters confided to it by the or ganic law be supreme over the Legislature and the Executive, and of course over the military branch of the Executive, it might, in any given ease, be misapplied by the error or the crime ot the judge. But this, like every other evil with which we may lawfully cope without, in accord ance with its provisions, amending the Constitu tion, has been anticipated and provided against 'in that instrument. For misconduct impeach mentis provided, and tor error the light of and all necessary facilities for appeal to another court. The Supreme Court, it is true, cannot be supervised, but it has no original jurisdiction, with two exceptions only. Such is tin; character of the judicial power, as the only and last resort _ of a class of cases .and contro -vcii^s-riiifttiarptcd in . the ' Constitution..- . ,(1 Crancli, 177,178.) But the action of the judiciary would be wholly ineffectual, and the power would not be co-ordi nate, unlessithejysuit, in a proper case,was con clusive and binding upon the. other branches of the government and the entire people of tliecoun try; for all the proceedings ol a court are con ducted for the sake of the result, which is the final process. A control, then, over the final process is a control over the whole proceeding. But a con trol over the whole proceeding is a control over the court, the judges and the parties. This would notbccontroling.butabolishiugtheconrt, whether he Who abolished it did or did not continue to em ploy its judges and methods of business for the administration of his will. That ho did so in one case is the same in effect as if lie had done so in all cases, for if he did it by permission of the court, it was the court, and not he, that exerted the power; if he did it without permission, and because, in his opinion, it was right for him to do so in that case; lie may do so in any other case in which he forms a similar opinion; and as it cannot be foreseen what opinion a man may form, it cannot be foreseen in what case he may think he ought to interfere; and if any case is liable to interference, no case is certain of reach ing a judicial result, and, under such circum stances, there can he no legal adjudication, and, consequently, no court. This shows the real necessity of a judicial authority which is securely fortified against all possible interference while the state of society admits of judicial sessions. Such being tho nature of the judicial junction, and its power in the federal government, it is ob vious that the territorial field of its operation is co-extensivc with the national domain, which, with respect to the judicial power, considered as a unit, is a single territory; subject to he divided into places of Jurisdiction as may be most conve nient for the purpose of administering justice. But with respect to the subject matters of judicial cognizance, it is far otherwise. A large propor tion of them pre-suppose, in their existence, or ganic geographical divisions, as into States, in choate States,and tho seat of the general govern ment, the District of Columbia. These are political divisions. Judicial divisions exist, but they are altogether independent of them. These are adapted solely to the presumed expediency of administering the ju dicial power, and may he altered from time to time by Congress. They may and usually do coincide in some degree with political and other divisions of the national domain. But they are not necessarily coincident with such. They aro places of jurisdiction. Circuits are com posed usually of several entire States, and dis tricts are sometimes composed of parts, only of diliereut States. This does not affect the causes oiVaction over which the judiciary shall exercise exclusive control, for they remain the same as if each State of tho Union was a district; and only districts were established, and no circuits. When a cause of action, or a criminal infraction of a law of the United States, arises for the action of the Federal judiciary, the cognizance of tho latter is forthcoming, and The' only question is, in which district or circuit shall it bo taken, Tho common territory of the nation is also subdivided for other-purposes, as for the purpose of collecting taxes, duties, &c., by act of Con gress, directly or through executive agents, em powered so to do by Congress. Sueli divisions, llkn the judicial provinces ,referred to, to chance ut the pleasure of Congress. The re construction military districts In; the South are, district for specific and temporary mu-noses But here arises a moat important distinction between judieml i ?dograpineal divl siahs and thosc“of-any other-Wna^wMchhayo over been created by Congress. U nti u lt ii c ial September, 17M> (1 Stat. 73 ct eeq.), the j mnc.al power of the United States was not ' Upon the passage of the celebrated act ol Con gross of that date, organizing the mfulor courts of the United States, tho whole j , , power, not directly vested in the Supreme C by the Constitujioii, vested in the lou . created. This proposition having been bud down after solemn argument by the greatest ol judges, and .never since disputed, must be ac cepted as unquestionable. It. follows irom tin that the ]iower of the Legislature cannot go be yond modifying and . changing irom tune to time, as in their .wisdom may seem expedient, the organization of the courts and divisions ol the country into judicial provinces. But having once vested the judicial power, which, as weave instructed Congress was bound to do, that body cannot have the power to vacate a judicial tract. But it is otherwise 'with the districting lor revenue or other purposes. The Constitution has not iuhifiiled their total abolition at the pleasure of Congress. But there Is another reason why Congress could not abolish the judicial districts of die United Slates, though they-may and fre quently do change their boundaries. The Con stitution provides: “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy ami publidHrial by an impartial jurv of the Stale and district wherein the crime shall have been com mitted, which district shall have been pieviously ascertained by law.” (Amendment Constitution. Art. Vi.) A power to abolish all judicial districts would, therefore, be a power to abolish all criminal jurisdiction ol the United States, which . would defeat the law-making power itsell. Ine judicial provinces ol the nation are, then, something more than revenue provinces or reconstruction pro vinces, employing tlie latter torpUor clearness of distinction. Though subject to the moiUlication of their boundaries, as may be expedient, tlie ter-' ritorv embraced in them cannot be either exone rated from the power of nor deprived ot the right to the national machinery of justice, except, in deed, when violence prevents the operation ol that machinery, but then only while the interrup tion continues to prevent the, regular judicial Hil lings. A violence cannot, of course, come Irom the legislature itself, least of all, through a mere const!uetioii id'its acts, passed with objects ex tremely remote from t-ueli a purpose. ■ . Vba't, then, is the statu.- of that judicial pro vince which is designated bylaw the "District ol North Carolina” with respect to die -ani lity ot the civil process? By liie act of Congress ot -fib June, b. o, l Stat. Igd, it in provided : "Tiie said Slate .-hull he one di-n ict. -to be„ en'llul the North Carolina Di-triet; and there shall he a district Court therein,Ac. ' . . ■ ISV the act id'Kdh July; l- ld, /!'.•* tat. it is provided that "the circuit courts ot the l.mteil .Statis, l'or the District of North Carolina, shah tie laid on the first Monday in June, ' * and all actions, suits, appeals,.recognizance*, pioce.-is. writs and proceedings whatsoever, pending, or which may he pending in said cow ts. of returnable thereto, shall have day therein, and be beard, tried, proceeded with amide- 'ls ting act repealed? It will not be pretended that nil act of the Congress of the l nited Stales has been* repealed by circumstances. If ever Congress has impaired u eonstitutidi.nl judica ture. once established by tiie people, it w:ta not by an implied repeal. Nor could it be done by any implication, but such as could be reconciled with uo other reasonable interpretation of the statute supposed to work such repeal. In tlic present matter,however, the opposite implication, from an act which took effect on the-, same day with the first of the Reconstruction acts,amounts almost to an express provision for the continu ance of the North Carolina District, m common with all the others, as follows: ‘•That the Chief Justice of the Lnited States and the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court shall be allotted among the circuits now existing, bv order of the court, and whenever a new allot ment shall be required or found expedient, by rcaton of alteration of one or xnore circuits, or ot a Chief JusUce or Associate Justice, or otherwise, it shall be the duty of the court to make the same,” dee. (Act of 2d March, 18G7.) The circuits (and consequently the districts composing them) ‘‘now existing,” i. e„ existing on the day the first of the reconstruction meas ures took effect, were the express basis of the allotment, to authorize which was the object ot the above quoted provision. The possible ‘‘al teration" of said circuits was anticipated, show ing that until one or more circuits should be al tered by law, they were not to-be otherwise re cognized than as heretofore. Accordingly, tile following is on record in the Supreme Court, under date of Monday, April 8,1867 : “Ordered, That the following allotment is made of the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Suites among the courts, agreeably to the yet of Congress in such ease made and provided.” The assignment of tlic •several justices is sub joined, among which the Pillowing appears : “For the Fourth Circuit, • Salmon I’. Chase, Chief Justice." . The first section of the act o( Cougress of lath of July, 1882, passed when rebellion was in. full headway, thereby showing that the interruption, of the sessions by rebel violence was ’the only change which Congress was willing to recognize in the judicial business, provides: ; ■ . “Hereafter the districts of Maryland. Delaware, Virginia and North Carolina shall constitute the Fourth Circuit.” (12 stftt M 576.) ■ ' It is thus'made apparent, not only by earlier, but by contemporaneous legislation ol the Bame session, bv the same Individual members, and almost on the same day, that wheatever,{under the Constitution of the United States, either of authority or jurisdiction, attaches to the districts and circuits as they stand in the statute hook, was intended to be, and must be deemed and iielu to be, of full force and virtue now as heretolore. But we have seen that a tract of country com posed of States or parts of States, once brought under the operation of the, judicial power, cannot without revolutionary violence, lie deprived of or exonerated lrorn it Vio lence is the only recognized exception, and that bv Congress, as we shall hereafter see, is re cognized only while the violence lasts, and then as an' unlawful derogation from the judicial P °lf °R be admitted that the judicial power is in tact in the district of North Carolina, though the subject matters of its authority are limited to a category,kit is certain that upon those subject matters the courts of the United States for that district arc the supreme authority of the United high prerogative of the independent judi ciary may he well illustrated, in closing a sketch of the Department of Justice, by a word respect ing the conclusive and binding character ot a judgment law. It may be rendered even by an inferior court; hut if the court is competent, the judgment inuy he defined to ho the very law of the land for the particular matter adjudged. (1 Ra'wlo. 28'.).) To ‘‘suspend!’ a judgment in a man ner not pointed out by law is, therefore, to sus pend the law. , The Supreme Court says: “There is no principle of law better settled than that every act of a court of competent juris diction shull be presumed to bave been rightly done till the contrary appears. * _ * So long as a judgment, remains in force, it is in itaell evi dence of the right of the plaintiff to the thing adjudged, and gives him a right to process to ex ecutc. the judgment. Iho errors of however apparent, can bo examined only bv appellate power.” (Voorhecs vs. Bk. U.S. lu , inquire the Legis lature of the Union has attempted to vest in^pai but one oflhev'.ry ngn OXOOU t O perty” which, it the Btrac tiou districts, the {twftW one oi tBo reconsuu .‘protect” by commanding officer is ““Construction laws? C m pl 2 C d >tarcli, 1867, section 3.) It must be (Actot *ci iviarcu, the authorities and the beyond dispute, j¥^ 0 been introduced statutes which ,j o right of litigating in the are accepted, that the iigm t of tf ein g tried in ti Ct m r fok vtalatlonß of the criminal code of the S Itlrea and, Of course, thodue conserva- Hon offheir authority in overy form, are a part of the rights to be protected, and the duties to bo performed try the respective commanders of the reconstruction 'districts. -In tills view, thoerror ofUen'erol Sickles reaches Lhc of a perverslojn of ! authority, which, if persisted in, ■'must immediately acquire the character ot the crime of levying war against tlie United States— an undertaking which would not for a moment JjoJmpvitcdto Be the deliberate Intention of an of ficer lionoraCly dlatim-itislicd for his gallantry Tn dciencc of the Constitution. But, it might be said, may there not hare been a doubt as to jurisdiction ? Certainly in this, us in any otliermatter,there may havo liccn a doubt. But it would insult the intelligence of the com mander of the Second Beconstruetion District to inquire whether or not he supposed himself au thorized by law to forbid the Supreme Court of the United States from heaving causes allectiug per sons inhabiting the States of North and South Carolina, without his consent. Naturally no per son could hesitate whether he had such a power, without considering whether it was not his duty to coerce the-court ,by amis.if it should resist him? \Ve mtist take it to be certain that it could not have been in’ the contemplation of (Jen. Sickles, when issuing his Order No. 10, to dispute with his sword theauthority of the Supreme Bench. Yet, it is equally certain, tlmt if he had been dis posed to ascertain his authority, through au ad judication by a competent court, a decision 'might have been procured with the greatest fa cility, A defendant could have raised the ques tiou’of imisdiction in nearly any ease at the term. If the judgment was then adverse to the power of General Sickles, it must have appeared east to procure a final ami conclusive decision in the Supreme Court on a writ of error. If that officer had a doubt on this subject then, lie must have known the only lawful course for its solu tion. Where a difference arises between a mili- tary agent and a court, as to the jurisdiction of the* latter, and the former presumes to decide it for himself in liis own favor, the act can bear no other name than usurpation. . But it may lie thought he did so only au to the inferior court, and not to the Supreme Court. Now, though he may not have suspected the fact, a moment’s reflection must show'that the nterfcrerjcc which 1$ under'consideration, war, an nterferenec by Ueii. Sickk-s with die judiciary, •ichuling the Supreme Court of the United Slates, as a whole, and tin; force which, through liis subordinate, Colonel'Frank, was threatened against. Hie process of the Circuit Court cannot, I think, be distinguished in Law from a similar threat, rudely directed to the Judges of the Su- preme’Court at Washington. The process which was in Marshal (iooiiii.i V. hands might, and v mired for aught, tint appears here, may have been pi.ocess/i.-sui <1 in pi.-r.-e iiicc of a mandate from tlie Supreme (emit, remanding a cause with directions fur furtli, r proceedings in con formity to litc decision of that court. A control ovi r ~ii '■ h pi' fv-', ia iniv mm n ki/ti. iji nny final pioi.md would fot a r<,ulrol over tin- whole prut-n ilinirt and Ihu com l it.-.cll, it" M’.'VJ ;' jadcc-i o! Ihcir ju t! if i:il v..ili. . Mon-o'vtr, ili'inal j>ro!-< •.-•may la.- routrolk- ‘!.drill not be !;>-Li‘.ltttv.i. lit.. If the ir.lcifereuic ol pro.-,which is now in hum! cnld 1.. - jiwtili. d, could mi ideoiual In terference. at UIIV chute :i!. 1 1 ill .'ill}’ ease," at !iii ph amre, in■ the Carolina ili.-!rict-. In: m ule .by General Sickles 1" prevent nil aprc-d to tin.* istipn. me Court. . This, _ potcutiaby. is 'mi.-ting till- jurisdiction ol tli« Supremo Court itH-lf. iiliolkliiiiu the Federal courts as filch in tin separating hi- di-:- trict iti one vital parthimr -from the national body politic, anil depriving Congress, thelixeeu tlvtr'hiid tin- people of all means of enforcing his subordination to the lulled .States, except by force of arms. The virtues ol no man may he permitted to authorize him to umpire, to so danyrr ous an independence of his fellow-citizens. .So if there had been adoubt whither the powers of the Cnited States courts were alfecled by the. re construction laws, the proper way to solve it was the very thing which would he totally excluded bv the violent action which has been taken in the premises. But is there so much as a doubt? THK RKCOSSTKCCTION bTATCTUS. Three acts of Congress puss under the desig nation Of the Reconstruction laws, viz : Those of the 2d March, the 23d March, and Oie ft'tb July, IWJ7. The preamble of the first declares a state of political and social dissolution to be impend- • In;- nr nriimlly existing in several States of-the Union, and that, in consequence of their condi tion, and for the purpose of effecting their resto ration, the legislation hu>- become, ne cesforv. Sup[»osing the conditions to bcas de dared’iu the preamble of the first act. these statutes arc to he treated as eminently remedial and conservative. The States being prostrate, in the ooinlon of Congress, the object was to re storetbem. But the legislative and executive departments of the government partook in no degree, of the prostration, as would be conceded; ami liow much did the judicial department par take ol It? • . ■_ . ■ - If the object was to reconstruct want hadlallcn nto ruin, so that it should be restored, in good order, shall that which is in good order he over turned ? Obviously; what was left of order was to tie conserved, and what was in disorder was to be restored, iu respect to the revenue, the mails, etc., I have heard of no such destructive iuter leicuce, but. in respect to me courts, the dispo sition is exhibited to destroy. Yet the whole se ries of provisions in the several acts contain nothing in which I can perceive a‘source tfor uuy such an astonishing 'misconstruction. On the contrary, the following act. which, like the act relating to the allotment of justice, took effect on tile same day with the cntlicst of the Iteconstrue iion acts, appears to demonstrate the - opposite view. ... .... Aj?>.^t*or' writs of error-- 1"0 the ShpVJnieCotirV. ' ' Ji, it i.nactn/, .jr., That where any appeal or writ of error has been brought to the supremo Court from any final judgment or decree of any interior court of Hit United States, for any judi cial district in wbicb, subsequently to tbo rendi tion of such judgment or decree, the regular ses sions of such court lias been suspended or inter rupted by insurrection or rebellion, suth appeal or writ of error shall tie valid and effectual, not withstanding the time limited by law for bringing the same may have previously expired; and in eases where no appeal or writ of error has been brought from any such judgment or decree, such appeal or writ of error may be brought within one year from the passage of this act. The pro visions of this act shall not apply to any case in which the right to bring an appeal or writ or . error had expired before such suspension or in terruption ot the regular sessions of the court. (Section 1.. act of March 2, 1867.) . This act, if regard be had to its special obje.t, mav be taken to be in pari materia with the re construction laws, and to the like extent, under the rule, they are all to be read as one law. U'ke the three acts above mentioned, the object ot this was to remedy mischief which had the rebellion, butWr the purposeoi the judiciary, and not the district commnnde , were to be the instrumentality, ltights of appeal which had not yet expired Japse of Ume. wero cut oil' by circumstances, ihesc eircumstaneea continued until the limitation expired, anti wittx it the right, after winch they ceased. The object now was to revive said rights. The cn-eumstaiiLcS which had intervened, and which had now cc-a-ed, are denoted in the act. They are thus defined in it: “The regular sessions ut the court have been suspended or interrupted by msurrec- act by unmistakable shows, on the dav of passing the principal reconstruc tion statute, that with tile exception of the sus pension or interruption of the regular sessions of the Court by rebellion, iVc., the judicial estab lishment was perfectly intact, as if thebe had been no rebellion and no oceasiou for restorative legislation. That this only interruption had, to tho mind of Congress, wholly passed away, at least on the second of March, is evident train the fact that the act was passed granting a thing to-, be dono now on tho express ground that by such interruption it could not have been dope for merly, and requiring that it be done wiUun one year hence, as otherwise the time which, in the. absence of interruption, runs against the right, ..shall run in tho districts where the rebel is to take effect, as It runs Usowliere. Such, in respect to its dignity, its power, and tho unimpaired integrity of its machinery, is the judicial establishment of the United States. To guard its supremacy in tho administration ol justice, Congress has.provided stern laws. ■ t-UMSIIMK.NT'I'OR ItESIKTIW JIIMCIAI.. AUTHOItrry. The following provisions, among others,belong anv person or persona shall knowingly and wilfully obstruct, resist or opposo any ollicer ol tho United States in serving or attempting to serve or execute'anv mesne process or warrant, or anv rulo or ordor of any of the courts of tho United Slates, or any other legal or judicial writ I or process whatsoever, or shall assault, heat or wound any officer or other person duly autho- rlzcd, in serving or executing any writ, rule, or der or processor warrant aforesaid, overy person so knowingly and wilfully offending iu the pre mises shall; on conviction thereof, be imprisoned not exceeding twelve months, and fined not ex ceeding three hundred dollars. [Act 30th April, 1790, section 22. J ';. The offence ,of obstructing process consists; rays Mr. Justice Washington, in refusing to give up possession, or in opposing or obstructing the < xecutiou of the writ by threats of violence, ■which is in the power of the party to enforce. (United States vs. I.owry, 2 Vvash. 109.) Auy obstruction to the free action of the officer, or bis lawful assistants, wilfully placed in his way, for the purpose of obstructing him, is sufficient. (2 Curtis, C. C., 03!iiy" And what is “process” under this act? The ctWrts say it embraces every legal process whatsoever, whether, issued by a court in session, or by a.judge, or magistrate or commissioner, acting in tlie due administration of any law of tho Unlied fUales. (United States vs. Lukcris, 3 Wash., 33:"i.) Again: “If any. person or. persons shall, corruptiy.or by threats of force, endeavor to influcuce, in timidate or impede any juror, witness-or officer in any court of the United States in the discharge of his duty, or shall, corruptly or by.threats of force, obstructor impede the due administration of justice therein, every person or persons so offending sliall be liable to prosecution therefor by indictment, and shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment not exceeding three months, or both, according to the nature and aggravation of the offence. (Act of 2d March, 1331. sections 2 r -I, Stat. 48H.) These laws are in force. If the President could be supposed to be willing to suspend them, it is certain that lie, has not the power. He must, however, execute the laws. Wliat, then, shall be doDe with these? I shall consider, before con cluding. the peculiar energy with which the Exe cutive Department is hound to act where the pre rogatives of tlie unarmed but majestic judiciary are insulted. The execution of the criminal law’s of the United States, and especially all such as are intended to guanijudiei.il authority, belongs, under the President, to the supervision of the At torney-General. Itliappens thus to devolve upon this office to reflect the indignation which tlie law encourages Iff . the judicial breast against an in- Rubordiiiation which, when it refuse’s reverence, destroys power, unless tin- department to which l!ie national Bword is confided puts itself in mo tion for the vindication of the conslltutioual ■ ministers of Justice. liS,-f«.V-IIIII.ITV Of Ills. KXECUTIVK It is not without diffidence that the importance of the occasion evokes a further and final remark touching tile legal responsibility herein of the l'residi ul of the United .States. Whatever becomes a law contemplates for it.-elf that it shall be executed. It is thus with the revenue law, the postal law, the criminal laws, and the military lawn and it is thus with the 11 et.nsti ueiion ia\v s. which the present Kxecu tite.feels hound to carry ir.o, effect, in their true inti-lit and 'meaning, ascertained upon those prin ciples of interpretation-which arc them selves a tacit but substantive part of all statutes whatso- Kut.air.tiiis'lavvs of any country must be pre sumed to oe m harmony with each other, and, therefore, should they appear to conflict with cai.li other, tho reconciliation of them is a judi cial work, if, under the conditions of tlie case, the discrepancy is capable of judicial action, if not., dill as the’conflicting law.- mu.-t be executed, so they must lie re-coiniilci). and. conseijUently. in Hi ell a ease, those who iiiu.-l execute, liiu.-t also to that extent interpret the laws; If the Consti tution lie ouc of the law sin ipiestion. the princi ple is of course the tame, unless, indeed, it tic of. stronger application. (Chief Justice .Marshal, 1 (.’ranch. 177, 17*.; For the' purpose of this execution of the laws, however, there must be an Executive power. This power must be,vested, or else the country lias no Constitution. It may be vested as the ju dicial power of our government is, lu several persons or departments; or, as in some countries, in a laigc- assembly; or it may be vested in a sin gle individual. Wherever ft is vested, there is the corresponding responsibility. If the courts of justice are to be protected from degradation,- it can only be through the Executive power of tbn State. It cannot he by the law-making power, because its laws are ineffectual without execution, and that is impossible against resistance, without "physical force. This, then. Is a case for Executive intervention, ■which, considering the transcendent value of an independent judiciary, is of tlie utmost sanctity of obligation, unless it shall appear that the in dependence of the judiciary is not attacked, but only that the execution of a law by an executive agent Involves a conflict with the pretensions of the judiciary. The latter would seem to be the view of the-'Officer charged with the execution of the reconstruction of the Carolinas; and he is an executive officer. But jurisdiction is a judicial Huestiou, and one which the judiciary' has. in this iifstaiicc. decided, irad decided against the execu tive officer. rThe latter, not acquiescing, the case would resolve itself into a case of a collision be tween the Executive anil the judicial depart ments of a common government. That defines a revolutionary relation between them. But has that revolutionary relation arisen ? I think not. If the Executive power of the United States resists the judicial power of the United States, there.is, indeed, such a relation. But the Constitution of the United States provides : “Tlie Executive power slmll be vested in a President of tho United States of America." (Art. 11. -ection I.) All process of the Federal courts run in the name of the President of the United States, be cause the mandates of the court call .hint to. ac "tion, as they dW till to "sutiinission', and he must execute them allows of the bhrhest sanctity by the whole power of the nation it' necessary. Is your Excellency in a state of collision with the national judiciary!' If not, since the whole Executive power is thus vested in you by the organic law, and can be divested by nothing but a change of that organic law during your incum bency, it must follow that the ■‘collision of au thority" which is tho subject hereof, is the mere misdemeanor of a contumacious and uufaijhful executive agent, who, having offended against the lawful power of the judiciary, has rendered himself liable to prosecution according to law. -But the great responsibility which appears to me to arise on such an occasion, where the physical power of the offender ,is great, is this; That for the sole Executive to suffer the judiciary to be overthrown in any ease would ho potentially to overthrow it himself,and therefore,lam solemnly impressed with the belief that unless the Presi dent promptly represses the contumacy thus disclosed to him, he will be exposed to the just imputation of a culpable insensibility to the co ordinate dignity and paramount sanctity of the national department ,of justice. Contempt of luw indulged speedily grasps at thfe heart-strings of public order. So teaches history. Verv respectfully, your obedient servant, John iff. Hinckley, Acting Attorney General. To Andrew Johnson, President of the United States. Be.nma.min' Fuanklin made Ins runaway journey to New York by water in J Tiffi. lie had a favorable wind most of the time, and xvas three days on the water. An incident occurred on the way which induced him—a youth of seventeen —to abaridon an exclu sively vegetable diet, which he had some time before adopted on the recommendation of an author named Tryon. They were be calmed off Block Island, and the crew em ployed themselves in. catching cod, of which they “hauled up a great number.” Till then he “had stuck to the resolution of eating nothing that had had life." Following the doctrine of Tryon, he considered “the taking of every fish a kind of unprovoked murder,” since uoue of them had been or could be guilty of any injury “that might justify the massacre." He had, however, unfortunately for the Tryonie theory and Benjamin’s prac tice under it, been formerly a great lover of fish. It is the weak side of people, especially of hungry apprentices, in a certain part of the country that shall bo nameless. “When it came from the ftying-pan,” says young Ben jamin, “it shieit remarkably well.” What was the dead letter of Tryon's treatise com pared with a treat like that? “I balanced for some time between principle and inclination, till, recollecting that when the fish were opened I saw smaller fish taken out of • their stomachs, then thought I, ‘if you eat one an other, I don’t see why we may not eat you,’ so I diued upon'cod very heartily. —Edward Everett. 1 "Bulletin. I.TVKnPOOL—Bark Amle, Reeil-25 tons pig iron^B &\V Welsh; 411 cks soda ash Jessup Sc Moore; 138 do Ynrnnll & Trimble; 10,400 loose bath bricks A R Mc- Henry & Co; 17.000 fire brlcks TO do 130 do 110 bags cement 3 S Ilnrfee; 900 bxs tin plates 408 do N & Cl Taylor Co; 80drams caustic soda Krencn, Kichards Sc Co; B 1 do Varnali* Trimble; M bar tin plates £ H Billies; 25 cirs rotten stone R Sceger; 4 cks lutw Hftfi- Hinger & Brittain; 05 cks soda ash Yaruall & Trimble; Bdo mdpc Jameß, Kent, Santee & Co; 141 pkgn ethw 13 cks mdse P Wright & Sons; 140 grindstones Jas E Mitchell; 29 pices lidw Vance Sc Landis; ldoJLec; 250 steel bars 100 bills caustic soda 60 tes blclig pow ders 155 pigs lead 20# bxs mdse 20 pkgs do 123 casks soda ash order. i LIVERPOOL— Ship Wyoming, Burton—ll 33 rails Brown. Sbiplcy Sc Co; 800 bdls rud iron 120 bars bar Iron 023 bdls do 921 do hoop do Stcever & Whitaker; 15 crates etbw A Tomkinson; 80 do do Salt, Mcar & Scbropp; ocs eleel DO bdls do AM F Watsou; 6 cases mdse W F Read; 1 case do J Mastin & Sons; 145 tidin' rod iron 57 bdls boon do 115 bars bar do 40 bdls do do '4l bills scroll do order; 1 ease mdse Davis. Poner & Coates; 1 cape do Chas Campbell; Idoll G Freeman; 0 bales matting W J P Ingraham; 21 crates ethw Brown, Shipley Sc Co; 847 bills hoop iron A Outhbert Itobei Is; 35 cs 'machinery H Gnreed * Bros; 88 drums caustic soda order: 339 bills rod iron WP Potts; 237 phgs ethw 250 bxs Lantivi: tin plates 250 bxs old castle tin plates 600 lixfi R G ternc plains order; 17 rollß floor cloth 18 bales matting Brown, Shipley & Co; 143 casks soda ash 50 tes blchg powder Ynrnall Sc Trimble; 70 bdls bar Iron 382 do hoop do J .l et G Gillingham; 139 bills bar Iron 120 do hoop do 173 do rod do W F Potts; 2 lihds ethw 11P &W O Taylor; 3 crates 1 cask do W Stratton; 2 cks hdw 8S hags nails Lamg A Magindis; 1 cr.sk haw Wagner Sc Stuart; 1 do N& G Taylor Co; 2 hdw 5 do chains 4 loose do Nowlln/Fcruley & Co; 14 anvils 1 cask hdw sdo chains Latham, Lewis & Co; 20 anvils 3 cks hdw Lloyd, Supplee Sc Walton; 7 casks ethw Marxscn & Witte; 23 cs coarse mdse Stuart Sc Bro; 3 kbls oatmeal wm Brocltie; 12 anvils 2 casks hardware WH& G W Allen; 4 bills fry pans 2 anvils Shields Sc Bro. NASSAU via Cotinary Cay—Brig LaCriolla—l27 logo mahogany 51 do cedar 20 ions Brazilian wood 24 lons old iron 2 cs indse Budd & Comly. IdOVkinEHTh OF OCEAN STEA3IEBB, TO ARRIVE. Kami. raoM Ton can, Atlanta London. .New York Ang. 17 Uansa. Southampton. .New York Aug. 20 Manhattan’ Liverpool.. New York -...Aug. 20 Worcester.....,. .Liverpool. .Baltimore Aug. 21 City of Boston... .Liverpool. .New Y0rk.......Aug. 21 Virginia. Liverpool. .Now York Aug. 21 Guiding Star Havre. .New York.. Aug. 21 Moravian .Liverpool. .Quebec Aug. 22 Persia.. Liverpool.. New York. Aug. 24 Edinburgh Liverpool. .New York. Aug. 24 Malta Liverpool. .New York Aug. 27 City of Baltimore. Liverpool. .New York Aug. 23 TO DEPART. Arizona New York. .Asptmvall Sept. 1 II Hudson... . .Philadelphia. .Havana Sept. 3 Semin New Yorkv.Liverpool Sept. 4 Tripoli .New York. .Liverpool Sept. 4 Pioneer aiiadclphia..Wilmmgt’n.NC...Sept. .6 .inniata hiladelphia..New Orleans.... Sept. .1 W Jvverrnan . uiladelpliin. .Charleston Sept. Wyoming hfiadelphia. .Savannah Sept. 5 Tioga. l’hi] aha. .New Orleans... .Sept. 7 Villc lie Ihiri.-.. .New York. .Havre Sept. 7 Penns', haiha New York. - Liverpool .Sept. 7 United Kingdom.. N York. .Ginsgow Sept. 7 City ol Boston. .New York. .Liverpool Sept. 7 Get mania...... .New York. .Hamburg Sept. 7 Cor,ecu New York. .No ,SlU,v:t:i:i ....Sept. 7 Manhattan New Ye-k. .Liverpool ...Sept. 11 Elba New York. .Liverpool Sepr. 11 Aleppo New York,-.Liverpool Sept. 11 Columbia New Sept. 14 WM. C. KENT, I TIIOS E. ASHMEAD, - Monthly Comhittxi. CHARLES SPENCER. J MARINE BULLETIN. T Sm». Kiseh, 5 S 3 j Sun Setb, G 27 J Hion Watxb, 4 '54 ARRIVED YESTERDAY. Bark Amie, Heed, 6$ days from Liverpool, with indie t'» Peter Wright &, Bone. Brig La Criolla (Br), Jordan, 23 (lavs.from XaseatP via Culinary Cav.whb logwood,&c. to Rudd at—TWO FRONL3. Immediate poaaesaion. ' HOTEL and large lot, known as the * ABBLY,” Township Liue Rood, near the Wieaa hickon. $l,OOO may remain. Perembton* Sale—For account of whom it may con cern—OlL LANDS, 2,000 acies, Western Virginia, Salo absolute. BrsiNKßfl Lohati on- FOUR-STORY BRICK DWELL ING. No. 265 Soutli Fifth etreet. north of Spruce at. THREE-STORY BRICK STORE and DWELLING, No 1726 Caliowhill Htreet, east of Fifteenth. Immediate poBw*fif*ion. COUNTRY PLACE, 8# acrea, Ilaiumonton, Atlantic counuvNew J«-raey. TIlftEE-STOKY BRICK DWELLINGS. No. 1706 Vaaey Btrecr. between Srruce and Pirn* 8t«. THREESTOKY BRICK DWELLING. No. 1664 Shippcn pfreet. writ of Sixteenth. BUILDING LOT. Dauphin street, went of Coral fit, TRACT 100 ACRES Coal and Timber Lands, Jay town* ship, Elk county. Pa. ALU ABLE BUSINESS STAND-Store No. 186 South Liehth street below Cliefttnut street, feet front. Cutaloguen. noiv ready. AT PRIVATE SALE. Handsome Brown-stone Residence, with Furniture. Apply at the Auction Store. TO RENT—Several Oflicea, Harmony Court. TCHN B. MYERS & CO., O AUCTIONEERS, „ Nob. 232 and 234 MARKET street corner of BANK. LARGE PEREMPTORY SALE OF BOOTS, SHOES, BROGANS. TRAVELING BAGS, &c. . ON TUESDAY MORNING, Sept. 2, at lo o'clock, will be sold, by catalogue, on FOLR MONTHS’ CREDIT, about 2JOO packages Boot/, Shoes, Brogan?, &c-, of city and Eaaterm manufacture. Open for examination, with catalogues, curb* on morn ing of Hale. LARGE PEREMPTORY^SALE OF BOOT 3, SHOES, TRAVELING BAGS, RESIDENCE AND FURNITURE. v • • . ON FIUDAY MORNING. September 13, at 10 o’clock. Three-story Brick Residence with three-atory back building, No. 632 Pine street, 19 feet by 135 ieetplparlor42 feet deep; large dining-room and kitchen on first floor, large chambers, eight marble man ti ls, cooking range, heaters, »fcc., being a substantially built and commodious residence. May be examined any time previ na to eale. SUPERIOR FURNITURE, CHANDELIERS, FIXE TAJPEST K V'CARPETS, Immediately after the Residence will be sold by cata logue. the superior Parlor, Diniug-room and Chamber Furniture,.Bronze Chandeliers, fine Tapestry Carpets in allot the rooms, very superior Extension Table, Plated V are. Kitchen Furniture, d?c. THE PRINCIPAL MONEY ESTABLISHMET. N. E corner,of SIXTH and RACE streets. Money advanced on Merchandise generally—Watches. Jewelry. Diamonds, Gold and Silver Plate, and on all articles of value, for any leugth of timo agreed on. WATCHES AND JEWELRY AT PRIVATE SALE. Fine Gold Hunting Case. Double Bottom and Open Face English, American and Swiss Patent Lever Watches; Line Gold Hunting Case and Open Face Lupine Watches; Fine Gold Duplex nnd other Watches; Fine Silver Hunt ing Case and Open Face English, American and Swiss Latent Lever and Lepine Watches; Double Case English Quartier and other Watches; Ladles' Fansy Watches; Diamond Breastpins; Finger Rings; Ear Kings. Brads. &c,\-Fine Gold Chains: Medallions; Bracelets: Scan. I 'ins; Breastpins; Finger Rings; Poncll Cases and Jewelry generally. FOR SALE,—A large and valuable Fireproof Cheat, suitable for a Jeweler, price 8650. Also, several Lots in South Camden* Fifth and Chestnut streets. TL. ASHBRIDGE & CO.. AUCTIONEERS, • No. 605 MARKET street, above Fifth. LARGE POSITIVE SALE OF FOOTS AND SHOES. ON WEDNESDAY MORNING. Sept 4, at 10 o’clock, we will sell by catalogue, about "latXTpackngefl of Boots aud Shoes, of City and Eastern manufacture, to which the attention of the trade is called. Open early on the morning of sale for examination. LARGE POSITIVE SALE OF CARPETS, &c. ON THURSDAY MORNING. Sept. 5, at 11 o’clock, we will sell by catalogue, about 150 pieces lugruin, Venetian. Cottage and Rag Carpets, to which the attention of City and Country buyers is called. Open early on morning of sale for examination. p J. WOLBERT, AUCTIONEER, \J. 16 Booth SIXTH street. TO PRIVATE GENTLEMEN. CHOICE IMPORTED CHAMPAGNE! SPARKLING HOCKS, MOSELLES, BRANDIES, WINES, WHIB - KIES, GIN, RUM. SAEE3 EVERY FRIDAY MORNING. m Bates of Furniture At Dwellings attended to off the most Reasonable Terms. >-.eU . 'v AUCTION 9ALES OAMUEL C. FORD A 80NB, AUCTIONEERS; D 127 Strath FOURTH .treat ) tST Real Estate, Stocks, Loans, Ac,, at Private Sale, JAAIE6 A. FREEMAN, AU^XONEE^^ Jbt/AUBEJK* F. H. WILLIAMS, Seventeenth and Spring Garden Streets. 100,000 FEET WALNUT LUMBER Jyl6-tu th e toi “United States Builder’s Mill,” No. 24,26 and 28 S. FifleonthSl., FH ILAIjEIiPXII A. ESLER & BROTHER, kantjfaotcreus or WOOD BODLDINGS, BRACKETS, STAIR BAIUSIERS, NBWHI POSTS, GENERAL TDRNIN9AND SCROLL WORK, it The largest assortment of Wood Mouldings in this city constantly on hand. je&-3m5 —a ELEOT _ wTn , : IOD 4 • BOARDS AND PLANK. ~. d-4, B-4, 6-4,2, 2M. 3 and 4-tneh, CHOICE PANEL AND FIRST COMMON, 18 foot IOU 4-4, B-4, 64, 2, 2 Vf. 3 and 4-inch. MAULB, BROTHER * CO., No. 2600 SOUTH Street 1 Q£7 -BUILDING! BUILDING! BIULDING! 100 4 . LUMBER l LUMBER l LUMBER! 44 CAROLINA FLOORING. M CAROLINA FLOORING, 44 DELAWARE FLOORING^, 14 DELAWARE FLOORING^ ASH FLOORING, WALNUT FLOORING, SPRUCE FLOORING, STEP BOAKDS, RAIL PLANK. PLASTERING LATH. MAUIaE. BROTHER* CO., No. 2500 SOUTH Street 1 Q£7 —CEDAR AND CYPRESS SHINGLES, 100 4 • CEDAR AND CYPRESS SHINGLES/ COOPER SHINGLES, No. 1 CEDAR LOGS AND P6STB, No. 1 CEDAR LOGS AND POSTS. MAULE, BROTHER * CO, IQAT -LUMBER FOR UNDERTAKERS! 100 4 • LUMBER FOR UNDERTAKERS! CEDAR, WALNUT, MAHOGANY, CEDAIt WALNUT, MAHOGANY. _ ■ MAULE, BROTHER * CO. ICA7 -ALBANY LUMBER OF ALL KIND& iOOj • ALBANY LUMBER OF ALL KINDS. SEASONED WALNUT. SEASONED WALNUT. DRY POPLAR, CHERRY' AND ASH. OAK PLANK AND BOARDS. HICKORY. ROSEWOOD AND WALNUT VENEERS. - * MAULE, BROTHER*CO, 1 Rfi7 -CIGAR BOX MANUFACTURERS. . 100 4 « CIGAR BOX MANUFACTURF.RS. SPANISH CEDAR BOX-BOARDS. • No. 2600 SOUTTH Street 1867 ” S q]^' e JOIST-SPRUCE JOIST-SPRUCE U FROM 14 TO 32 FEET LONC. FROM 14 TO 32 FEET LONG. SUPERIOR NORWAY' SCANTLING. MAtXE, BROTHER * CO., : my 13 tf} No. 2600 SOUTH Street LUMBER— THE UNDERSIGNED ARE : PREPARED to furnish any description of Pitch Pino Lumber, from St Mary’s Mill, Georgia, on favorable terms. Also, Spruce Joist &c., from Maine. EDMUND A. SOUDER * (Xb, Dock Street Wharf. my29*tffl OPRUCE LUMBER AFLOAT.--SCANTLING AND O Joist of length from 14 to 28 feet long, assorted sizes, Bx 4 to 3x14, about 160 M. feet For sole byWORKMAN * CO.,'No. 123 Walnut street ÜBlKliKlliil, I.KjUUIU, dtc. WHITE PRESERVING BRANDY, PURE CIDER AND WINE VINEGAR, GREEN GINGER, BUSTARD SEED, SPICES, ic„ Sc, All the requisites for Preserving and Pickling purposes. ALBERT C. ROBERTS, Dealer is Fine Groceries, / Corner Eleventh and Vine Streets. SUPERIOR VINEGARS. French White Wine, and Pare Old Cider Vinegars. For sale by JAMES R. WEBB, lass WALNUT and EIGHTH STKEEIB. EW 31 ESS MACKEREL. PICKLED SALMON, MESS Shad, and Tongues and Sotiuds in kitts, just received and for Bale at C'UUSTY’S East-End Grocery* No. 118 South Second street. ATEW CROP TEAS—FINEST QUALITY OF CHINA Li and Japanese Teas in store ana tor sale at COUSTY’S East-End Grocery, No. 118 South Second street. PURE OLD JAMAICA RUM, HOLLAND GIN,’ Medicinal AVines and Brandies, Speer's Port Wine and California Wines, in store and for sale at COUSTY’S East-End Grocery, No. J 118 South Second street. \TEW GREEN GINGER. —2OO LBS. JUST RECEIVED, it in prime order. Forsale at COUSTV’S East End Gro cery, No. 118 South Second street. WHITE PRESERVING BRANDY, PURE CIDER Vinegar, Pure Spices, Mustard Seed, on tl era tills order, and make your return how >ou have executed tho Honorable JocorliAllltoon,; rreeident of our said Court, atPliilude phiu.the fo rtl diij ofJ l "< • iu tho year of our Lord ono thousand eight bundled and sixty* B °S-lftW-4tt T,O. WEBB. ProProthonotary. t boabwivb. mHE HANDSOME RESIDENCE 801 SOUTH EIGHTH I rnrner of Spruce, 1b now- open to receive boarffijf’ Sui tea of room., with prtvato table, if ide sired. ttllßlm . tvuoMfi VACANT FOR PERMANENT BOARD- R IBM tihwhm t Btrcot ltcferonce required. auB7-«t» I'KKSONAL. MItS JOHANNE IIENKE, DOCTRES3 AND MID. Vifo nSTOT Ohatharlno Btroot. -Special attention given to’tho woTb complaint, ... auilg-iaf FltUrr JARS.' AIR TIGHT. No. 16 North Fifth atrept ttusa-iat* jpBOWN BRAND IAYEITRiSWa;- WHt wwewaoo- - •* *- MJEIIIC4Ij> AYER’S. CATHARTIC PILLS, FOR vALL .THE OFA LAXA ' VE MEOrcrNE.-Pethip* one medicinal* to unfver* > llj required by every body a catnartlc/BtftTfaßever i y before eo tmiversally mntry .And., among- ait Wflou, aa thisniild pqt efn mt T»A ivious reason i&thstitifl a., ire reliable and. fat morn tectual reinedy/ ler. Those?' jem; those wno have »st» ... v .r i>ia<,itxurcß wteir neighbors and frienda f andJdl know that what it docs once it does always—that itnovgt Tailn through any fault or neglect of its composition*- .WA, have thousands upon thousands of ccrtincatesof nmrkahle cures of the following complaints, hut each cures are known in every neighborhood, and.we nced'ttofcv, publish them. Adapted to all ages and conditlons id |dl'- climates: containing neither calomel or any deleterious - drug, they may bo taken with safety by anybody,; Their .* .’sugar coating preserves them ever fresh ana ' pleasant to take, while being purely vegetable no.harm - can arise from tneir use in any/iuuniity. . 'Jhev operate by their powerful influence on tho inter nal. viscera to purify the blood and stimulate it into healthy action—remove the obstrnctions of the stomach* - bowel*, liver, and other organs of the body, restoring their irregular action to health, and by correcting, wherever they oTcist, such derangements as are the first origin of Mlnr.tr directions are riven in the wrapper'on the boy* for tin; following complaints, which these Pills rapidly cure:— , For Dvsrnr.srA or iNmoKSTfON, LisTi.KHSwr:afl., Lw and Loss ofAitetite, they should bo taken modcr atelyto stimulate the etomucb and restore its healthy tone and action. lor Livhr (krMrr.AiNT and its variotia symptoma, Brnr- OI K IiIiADACIIK, Su:K # HkaJ>AOUK, JaPNIMOE .Or .GItF.EW, Su’knfh.s, Biuotm Chun and Bir.iot?H .Fitters, they phould bo judiciously taken ior each caHOi to correct the diseased action or remove the obstructions which cause it. •. For Dvbentery or Diariiikka, but one mljd dose la gon ernllyrequircd. ; . For Riivtmatism, Gout, Gravel, Palimitation op the Hkart. Pai.n iktiikSjdk, Baok and Loins, they should be continuously taken, ns required, to clmng;ties, 'fourth street, above Vine.—One three-story AkLßuildlng, 42 feet by 180, extending to Dillwvn street , Has a cellar 14 feet deep, heavily arched. Well adapted for manufacturing or other heavy business.' Aloe, large foui-story DwelUug adjoining. For particu lars apply to J JOHN G. JOHNSON, auld-tf} • ' No. 708 Walnut street MFOR BALE-950 FRANKLIN BTREET, 25 x 112. 818 North Beventh street 23 x 140. 1827 East Delancey Place, 20 x 75. 1834 Spruce street 21 x 70. 1914 Pine street 18 x 105, . 1624 Summer street 28 x 90. AppIytoCOPPUCK* JORDAN, 433 Walnut street MFOR SALE OK EXCHANGE-A VALUABLE Country Residence, near the river Delaware, about six miles from tho city, on the Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad. A desirable city property would be taken in. pan, payment Apply to G. P. KEENE, 31 North Seventh street at the office oi Jas. Ottenon, Jr„ Esq. nu29-9t* MFOR SALE-EIGHTH STREET* ABOVE BROWN -Three-story Brick Dwelling, double buck buildings* side entrance. Lot 18x115. Also, a modem three story Brick Dwelling, on Twelfth street. Lot 19x100. FETTER, KKXEKBAUM &PURDY, 33 North Fiftli street 4fS> WEST ARCH STREET.—FOR SALE-A HAND- Bfhjsome four-story brick Residence, with three-story ■■■A double back buildings, Bituate on the south side of Arch street, near Twentieth. Has every modem conve nience and improvement. Lot 20x170 feet deep. J. M. QUMMEY & SONS, 608 Walnut street . 4a FOR SALE.—A HANDSOME BROWN. STONE UP Residence, 23 feet front built intlie best manner* and having all the modem improvements, situate on the south side of Locust street west ef Sixteenth, oppo site St. Mark’s Church. J. M. GUMMEY & SONS, o(j& Walnut street MFOR SALE.-A THREE STORY DWELLING * No. 260 North Eleventh street, and three story dwelling923MoyamenHing Avenue; also 2)6 story brick dwelling, 763 South Front street. Terms easy* Apply to COPPUCK & JORDAN, 483 Walnut street, i MFOR SALE.—THE HANDSOME THREE STORY brick residence, 23 feet front with attics, and three story back buildings, and famished with every modem convenience. Situate No. .903 Fine street Lot 116 leet deep. J. M. GUMMEY & SONS, 508 Walnut street MFOR SALE-THE VALUABLE STORE PROP ERTY, NO. 413 Commerce street Immediate pos session given. Is four stories in height, 20 feet front and lot 76 feet deep. J. M.,GUMMEY, h SONS, 60S W ft hiut street . FOR SALE-SPLENDID CEELI lsj|;j ton avenue, Germantown, containingfit teen rooms— **~knll modern improvements. Lot 80x236, and hand somely improved. Several desirable houses to rent— FETTER, KKICKBAUM & PURDY. aufi GERMANTOWN-FOR SALE-A HANDSOME W|u] pointedetone Residence, having every city conve niencc and improvement, situate on Harvey street, west of Green. Lot 76 feet front by 255 feet deep. J. M. GUMMEY & SONS, 508 Walnut street MFOU SALE-THE VALUABLE PROPERTY northwest comer of Washington Square and Locust street, three-atory brick Residence, with every modem convenience, side olttces, and in perfect order. J. M. GUMMEY & SONS, 608 Walnut street. jgA GERMANTOWN.—SEVERAL DESIRABLE BU. HiiM Durban Cottages for sale. Immediate possession. •■ML W. H. STOKES, Insurance Office, Germantown. Mfor sale-two new houses, walnut lane, filth and sixth houses, west of . Adame street* Germantown. Apply to A. W. HAND, 134 North Blxth street, Pkilada. Je37-tffl FOR SALE OR TO LET-LOTS ON COLUMBIA AV IBtb, 20th and 21st at*. Also on Broad. 13th ate., ana Montgomery avenue. Apply between 10 and 13 o'clock toM.C. LEA, 430 Walnut. • mW-vr f ml6tt TO RENT. M FURNISHED HOUSE FOB KENT.—A HAND (topic three-story Brick Dwelling, with three-etory back buildings, and furnished throughout; situate on ‘Broad street, below Pine, immediate possession given. l ' J. »l. G I M.M F.Y & SONS, 608 Walnut Street r KENT-FEW NO. 68, ST. FHILIF’S EPISCOPAL Church. Apply at 506 North Sixth st; au3l-2t* yT. LUKE’S CHURCH.-TO RENT, A PEW IN ST. O Luke’s Chore)), south aisle. Apply at No. 404 Chestnut street. au3o-Bt* /OFFICES—IN GOOD ORDER, NEAR THE STATE \J lUiisc, &c., to Let— in Olllce Buildings, Nob. 30 and S 3 North Fifth street. au3o-6t* rpO LET.—TIIE ELEGANT SECOND-STORY ROOM. J. 8. JO. corner Seventh and Chestnut streets—now occu pied by J. E. GOULD. , Also, from October Ist, the premises now occupied by EDWAIU) I*. KELLEY, 613 Chestnut street. Address EPWA RD P. KELLEY, 613 Chestnut street auSS-tT NEW FVBUOATIONS. JOHN PENINGTON & SOX, FRENCH, ENGLISH, CLASSICAL BOOKS, 137 South Seventh Street, au2llm} ' ~ JUST HEADY—BINGHAM'S LATIN GUAMMAU:— ei New Edition. ~A Grammar of .the Latin Language, Fortlio use of Schools. AVhh exorcise* and By William Bingham, A. M., Superintendent of the Bio*- PulSifhers take ploaaiire in announcing to Teacher* and friends of Education generally, that the now edition of the nhovo work in now ready, and they invite a careful examination of tho Bttine.and a other works* on the eamo subject. Copies will be forsifhod tfr Teachers and Superintendent* of School* for this* purpose at low rates. J*rice ifil JW. Published by E. H. BtfTLER * CO., 187 South Fourth street Philadelphia. And for sale by Booksellers generally. auah ALL THE NEW BOOKS. „ : BOOKS IN EVERY DEPARTMENT OF LITERA- I'UKE. : ■ JAMES 8. CEAXTON, ; Succwßor toffmß. & A. MarUen.iaH'CiitMtnuUUeot WOOL GATHERING : By GallHaninton. ■ r AN AROTIU BOAT JOURNEY: By laaao DOOM and OTHER IPOEHSfBy JOfa PQEMB; Comnletaln TwAVo»* IB Ofe BALE-PER BCHOONER SABINO FROH OH Jb npOt U 0 towißraeiletto wood, gp «U SaTTefiWMiJ^barrels nigu, Ajply to WORKMAN KCO,uaWotant rtrwt Vft> “W*r*-