MONDAY BIODSING. AVG. 24. Union slate Ticket. 0o►DBHOL: ANDREW G. ruurni, of Centre 5103 /VDU OF TIM 517PIMIL 0013 AT DANIEL AGNEW, of Beaver. truioll einUiti Ticket Car Prvoidog 1.4 p. of Oa Maria Cbekft. YOB® ILSPIPTOIS. Areal*. mei ortasa. • ALOONDSLAOL. An email B. SHOWN. a. DiIINUTO V. TEM J. arinum IL . • Ofori fgr O m *. W. J.HXBROZI. ri - me rf DAVID is Ps. litissiii" spina. mounts. ?Cr Stiktr, - ;WH. J. HIGUARDBON. rti_ oa a y, 4310 'S RANILTON. Ter DV, ier of Nii Pror. - JOHN f. more. Where le the National ItatclUtelleeri The pallor above-named, which Is- sup poind to reprownit the conseriratlve eletnent, hest an article of nearly four columatnpon this question "where are we 7" From its exordium, or key note, our impressions very naturally were, that It was the whereabouts of lhe country after whist it was groping. We' did not suppose there was any thing else, which would pay for the easulie. It turns out, however, that the "we" means merely our indiridual aloes, that the feud ing ioquiry is, "where is the filtelliposeiv Well, supposing the object to be worth all ibis search, we are not clear that the isteitigencer has beenable tolad-ant where It IS, or whether tt is not lost irretrievably in ther-fog. It la clear, however, that it has not - pada much p rogress la the discovery of the whereabouts of the cowry. Its first two columns are expended in; 'hewing that the object of the war, ita:pro clalitted by Congress ; and by the President hluiself, was not to interfere with the pc colter institutions of rho rebellious States, bate maintain and defend the Imprensay of the Constitution,andthe integrity of the Union. A paragraph of a dozen lines worild Lave settled that point We do not know that any body has ever disputed it Ito subject of complaint is the proclama tion-of freedom. It is not, however, the sot Itself that It projeiser to quarrel with. While it would make the impression that this was a deitarture from the principle, by convert ing that into an end or object, which wee onl*lntended as a means, it does not un dertake to charge it—but, on the contrary, distinctly admits that-"the Proclamation as ceneekrnd;" and explained by the Presi dent:4 was Sus expedient—a means 'to an end,and not an end Itself." The fault Is only that Mr. CHU; and come: other people, have expressed the opinion titht it =lea no difference, ;,if slavery dies bj itaown bands, whether this nerd la s eor.seguenes,eor an diets ot 9 the war.'.: If the latter be the fact—if there be ' any Who propose to continue the war be ' yond' the object originally and constitu tionally assigned to it—then thefetelligas. oer cannot support it, and must hold all stushito be "enemies of their country." We oannet, t else, however, what difference It makes that Mr. Clues, or any body else, says ex- thinks on this subject,, or what It baa to complain about, an long es the things donimre air admitted meow to the= very end, Which it professes to desire, and we would suggest, therefore, a postpoaement ot its denunciations, untathe Intended abject' is sehbried, and it can find some one to_pro. pose 0011 that we shall go beyen,d When the rebellion once subdued ,, it will cease to be o metier and become en object—if pur ened4brit - not till then. Thijotrfligarcer suggests, sit &deduction from Woe views, that it Is easy then for It to uSWer where it is—that it is now where It eras in the beginning, and thatit had. slew, opposed whatever had "a tald(Sulf to overlay the original theory of the war." distort, its position la always easy toles (wadi because, though the world mores, the Ii telligencer never either forgets any thing,`or learns any thing, and therefore neverehanges, or mores at all, unless he nutmeat° pole, slavery, happens to shift a little, in the convulsions of the times. It hi some thirg however to know from its own aSisfeasion, that ItTlits always opposed not only with measures as involved a de parture from the original idea—but such othesei:especially as had a "tendency" in that &intak:), by involving conseqiienees to slavery that could not be aimed at for their own sakes, and as an object of the war. F.visything therefore that might possibly destroy thsttinstittaiort was, in its judgment, to be avoided for its (cadencies, no matter what the,anueguences might be Jiteo,asion, or how:many Tree.'White 4 Northern lives it might mid, to experiment upon 'other remedies to, pat down the rebel lien, wlthout hurtlig rte authors. When it comes to the subordinate inquiry —aa irdoes it the foot 'of its 'third - ca. umn—"where the Matti be its *newer la, that.* have only to look around as, to see that, "In oobsequence of the "UAW Rot icy that bits been Interpolated on the-orig . total theory of the war," we are worse at than eihr' . And to prove this, we are pointed' , to the u esaarbatiOn of political strife" that has grown out of it—told that. "our unit woulihave made more progress"" arm to the 4.010101)n of a leading sece!elonist before,. the *iv; that the "abolitionists had hien the'heit - il. Iles of the secessionists." *. - It weld be an smelly& if ireiv 'not a melancholy thing, to hear: grown, men, with beet& upon their Gbh* 'Vivra/ '9' r o bstiod a warpolloy as arse*, cittlilst as though a elate of war was, not:A rodlisi evil to be uprooted, or dealt with/it:idlest remedial only, bat 4 thing to Weskit:bated by paths appliances-4nd as though coo. atrostimi; which L only attothefword for saving the enemy, rere tire way . ought 'Apt Ott forth lie whole stiengih and resources, for mains oat a gisiOnle rebellion which was threat- Tidy life. IV he not Os statai• Mess bat the and Sissiiorritri;-Isho would even think:of gulag rs2,stiftelb e ikT a de9 flesiging sal. the &owe probing Ii to the bottom, removing rte effeeta , sArA ll * 4-;"1W ver y Aad iitAWA r s minty tedi?topkiago,, fluilii 3 k# / * -1 / 1 4 a610...e5i;"6:1P4t ri ~} sa the Intellipencer, that the war to imp preset the rebellion was allowed to linger for soma twenty months, with our own cap _ ital-cuider siege for nearly half that time. Will the inteffigeneer inform:is r het we had gained ly taking"'the'advice of the Border State men, whose opinions it hoe represented, and retaining Sikh generals as lut favorite MoCiatta.ex, during all that period ? What was It but the delays and - 'reverses uhleh 'attended 11, that produced s, exoefrioatiaa of political strife," which It eupposes to have resulted from the in auguration, of the new' policy 1 . Will it . vatuttre,taigelere the fact that the feeling of treasonable hoetility to - the government, and to every meastwo which struck wig- I ' °rowdy at the heart of the rebellion; exieted at ilie outbreak in equal malignity, and owes only its development, to the encourage ' meat it has received from the inauspicious results of the feeble and faint-hearted pol icy, which wearied the people into disgust, sad induced so many of them to lend a fa vorable ear to the, suggestion, that the Re publican party and its adminktratien had not the vigor or ability to end the war—se cal.:rued, it was said, by themselves, in their almost exclusive resort to Democratic generals? The events which preceded rho rebellion show, that It was brought about by -the assurance of Northern Democrats that the great States would permit no coercion, and would take sides with the South, and they would have made good these assur ances, if the effect of the attack on Sumter had not shown them that they were "reck oning without their host." They etpd ap palkd in the presence_of that denienstra ken, and skulked into their hiding pieces, until the prolongation of the struggle, aad a tide of ill motes, retaking from the adoption of their own advice, and the em ployment of their own generals,. encouraged them to re-appear, upon the assurance that no administration could stand up in the face of an unsuccessfal war. If it was un fair that they should thus complain of the effects of their own policy-4t wee not un natural, on the other hand, that it should keep them in tolerably good humor,. or that an unusual "exacerbation"—ehould follow the conviction that the President beast last escaped from their hands, and was about to prosecute the war in such away, as would show the rebek that we were ii good earnest and as would be sure to end it. Then as to the effect of the proclamation. While it has exasperated the politicians, it has freed no slave, nye the Intelligences, and "our arms would have made more pro gressveithout If it be trneas stated, if it hurt nobody— it was indeed no worse than a Pope's _Bull against the Comet--we do not Bee exactly why it is, that the Intellistracer should make such a olamor about it. But that is not th'e reason. The intelifeeneer - knows better. The reception of that proo 'emotion at Richmond, and the acts and proclamations which followed . it there, show beyond controverey, that it did hurt eomebody down South—that it struck tie • great sensitive nerve—and that the twitchinge and ooavulsiona of Northern 1 Democrats, and newspapers like its own, were purely sympathello. If it had be lieved,with its disunionist friend, that. "the _abolitionists" as it denominates the friends of the new policy are "the beet allies of the d secessionlate," • instead of the COLITC:3O proposition—which° every sensible man there now admit," to be true, and every abolitionist in the North well kno we— that the ace:sionista have been the beat allies of the abolitionists—it would neither have complained of their policy, or so far for gotten itself, as to venture, in the presence of the great facto of the day, and in truth memory,g the history of thuttleastersof the ScOrrariahleCLLEL •an era, to have asser ted that our arms would have made more progress without it. Does it think that 1110- Claussa, or Boum., or ElAzzatcx, would have opened the Mississippi any sooner—or opened it. ail—under the policy of closing the tamps against the nogro, instead of in viting him, upon the offer of freedom, to abandon tags master he was feeding, and putting a musket in his hand? Does it really belleveLtitat the abolitionists who per , Eluded the President to arm the black regi ments which figured at Port - E.:Ason, Milli. ken's Bend, and Fort Wagner, are the best allies of the seceselonistat or "the actual Alders and abettors of the confederacy," or does it lament the loss of the valuable chattels whloh were thrown away, ;when less valemble white men could have been El;i===lrl!Mttll asthma frulteithloh it sees so clearly, but basso utterly failed toshow ? If It cannot see for itself the obvious and necessary ef fects ofthe Proclamation, let it inquire of any Ciandid and intelligent Rebel, and it will be told—as all Elotunond has told it alleady---that it was the first blow aimed at the Rebellion, which wont directly to its hear. ' If it is aot to bo satisfied in that way,lot it look back to the era of the great change of which it complains, and then at the condition of the country now—frith the Cordederaoy, then eio formidable, now rent, and diseolved and tumbllng lawman s--and then mill It has the hardihood, thtthare basil skeiggned, and llutt our , arms iitnild • . buy made" rote progiesionotlits the old military-sad - political regime irldohaourke so near destroying" as. No, the lisfelligenter does not iazi Ithe Union saved, mils= Slavery can be saved ailing with it, and therefore it is willing for once Co ,agree even with theTrllams, when it says that the President has ; not " mokoed Aisueli," by his proclamation, aid that its effect upon•the act:toot theelave,' leanly a question for the Courts. .14 ; will not be fonnd harmonizing with the .21 , 16une, when that paperiaright, as it generally ie. When asset* however, that semen who recog nises and adheres to his own obligation, is Ss ucle a. slave by it--and may astmle that Jt is void, and violate it, and then leave it So the Courts to determixm whether he had a right to Violate it or not--thew the 'Thum_ perms b willing to endorse a sentiment *Whit wotildsoont an immoral, if it did not look to the meapture of an escaped ohnAtel 7 or- the re•enslavement of a, man who has been made free. Is'Efinnter the Key to Charleston t snow to tlah'.qesetton the Ns! York , aneeminial Beterdei everdag, up The latest awn from . Charleston Is from rent roams to the ,Btoth whteh mate that nth* the bertha to tell enemata. taloa le gal enlist long Intervals." The nme ith aabolimpr--"The defame of the harbezdoes not depend Manly irpon Boaster. Brea if that fortniiit-theaki - be iblittentd:doira, Um kW* nupr ha bill." Is a TVs *fail ha that Coifed may - be banned down. In that men Charleston mast be et dos mercy .1' Admiral Dallren's Yost Baintarfe located nt a point stlech ado alandsihe inner harbor, and while it remained 4kAltdt....no vestal gssuld pass. As a teinfoka =en t Sumter, Buturegard 00 , 25cm:toted _the batteries on Morrie and . tittlilean'.. islands, ad as a furthr.. defence of the eit i J Mai:ll4lU and Plehoey wet,' tt , aagitioned anti eaud b:..tterl