©if gfrulw flfuwitvat BELLEPONTE, PA. Tho Largest, Cheapest anil Beat Paper I>UHMSHKO IN CKNTKIC COUNTY. lll.ACk vs. l\(JKItS()l,|„ An Able IhTeuse of (lirlslltinll). ,/wlye Black Meets the Great Infitlel Lec turer in Debate in the Payee oj the 11 North American Review" anil Gives Huna Taste of His Quality. Hou. Jeremiah SS. Hluck ami Col. Robert (J. Ingersoll have contributed articles to the August number of the North American Review in which the former defends the cause of Christian ity and the latter attacks and opposes it. Colonel Ingersoll's arguments are the same as those with which the pub lie has been made familiar in his lec tures. Judge Black in masterly rhet oric and with a fund of illustration that is remarkable, defends the Jew ish theocracy and then proceeds to dem onstrate the truth of the Chri-tiau religion. We regret that we have room for only a small portion of this able paper and as we are obliged to select a part we prefer to give that which relates more particularly to the Christian dispensation. Judge Black reasous as follows : When Jesus of Nazareth announced Himself to he Christ, the Son of (Jod, in Judea, many thousand persons who heard His words ami saw His works believed in Ilia divinity without hesi tation. Since the morning of the crea tion nothing has occurred so wonder ful as the rapidity with which this re ligion spread abroad. Men who were in the noon of life when Jesus was put to death as a malefactor lived to see Him worshipped as ( Jod by organized bodies of believers in every province of the Roman empire. In a few more years it took complete posses-ion of the general mind, supplanted all other religious, and wrought a radical change in humau society. It did this in the face of obstacles which, according to every human calculation, were insur mountable. It was antagonized by all the evil propuusities, the sensual wickedness, and the vulgar crimes of the multitude, as well as the polished vices of the luxurious classes; and was mo.-t violently opjsised even bv those sentiments and habits of thought which were esteemed virtuous, such a* patriotism and military heroism. It encountered not only the ignorance and superstition, but the learning and philosophy, the poetry, eloquence, and art of the time. Barbarism and civil ization were alike its deadly enemies. The priesthood of every established religion aud the authority of every government were arrayed against it. All these, combined together and roused to ferocious hostility, were over come, not by the enticing words <>f man's wisdom, but by the simple pre sentation of a pure and peaceful doc trine, preached by obscure strangers at the daily iieril of their lives. It is Mr. Ingersoll's idea that this hap|>en ed by chance, like the creation of the world ? If not, there are but two oth er ways to account for it: either the evidence by which the apostle* wi re able to prove the supernatural origin of the gospel was overwhelming and irresistible, or else its propagation wan provided for aud carried on by the direct aid of the Divine Being Him self. Between these two infidelity may make its own choice. Just here another dilemma presents its horns to our adversary. If Chris tianity was a human fabrication its authors must have been either good men or bad. It is a moral impossi bility —a mere contradiction in terms —to say that good, honest and true men practiced a gross and willful de ception upon the world. It is equally incredible that any combination of knave*, however base, would fraudu lently concoct a religious system to denounce themselves and to invoke the curse of God upon their own conduct. Men that love lies, love not such lies as that. Is there any way out of this difficulty, except by confessing that Christianity is what it purports to be —a divine revelation ? The acceptance of Christianity by a large portion of the generation con temporary with its Founder and His a{>o*tles was, under the circumstances, an adjudication as solemn and author itative as mortal intelligence could pronounce. The record of that judg ment has come down to us, accompa nied by the depositions of the princi pal witnesses. In the course of eigh teen centuries many efforts have been made to open the judgment or set it aside on the ground that tho evidence was insufficient to support it. But on every rehearing the wisdom and virtue of mankind have reaffirmed it. And now comes Mr. Ingersoll to trv the experiment of another bold, bitter, ami fierce reargutnent. I will present some of the considerations which would compel me, if I were a judge or juror in the cause, to decide it just as it was decided originally. First. There is no good reason to doubt that the statements of the evan gelists, as we have them now, arc gen uine. Tho multiplication of copies was a sufficient guarantee against any material alteration of the text. Mr. Ingersoll speaks of interpolations made by the fathers of the church. All he knows and all ho has ever heard on that subject is that some of the innum erable transcripts contained errors which were discovered and corrected. That simply proves the present integ rity of the documents. Second. I call these statement* dep. osiliont, because they arc entitled to that kind of credence which wo give to declaration* made under oath but in a much higher degree, for they arc more than sworn to. They were made in the immediate prospect id' death. lVrtiaps this would not idled the con science of an atheist —neither would an oath—but these people manifestly believed in a judgment after death, before a (Jod of truth, whoso displeas ure they feared above all things. Third. The witnesses could not have been mistaken. Tho nature of the facta precluded tho possibility of any delusion about them. For every aver ment they had "the sensible and true avouch of their own eyes" and ears. Besides, they were plain-thinking, so ber, unimaginative men, who, unlike Mr. Ingersoll, always, under all cir cumstances, and especially in the pres ence of eternity, recognized the differ ence between mountain* and cloud*. It is inconceivable how any fact could bo proven by evidence more conclu sive than the statement of such per sons, publicly given and steadfastly persisted in through every kind of per secution, imprisonment, and torture to 1 the last agonies of a lingering death. j Fourth. Apart from these terrible tests, the more ordinary claim* to credibility are not wanting. They were men of unimpeachable character. The most virulent enemies of the cause they spoke and died for have never suggested a reason for doubting their personal honesty. But there i* affirmative proof that they and their fellow-disciples were held by those who knew them in the highe.-t estima tion for trulhfulnc-*. Wherever they made their report it was not only be lieved, but believed with a faith so implicit that thou-and* were ready at ( once to seal it with their blood. Fifth. The tone and tctujHT of their narrative impress u* with a sentiment of profound resjiect. It i* an artle-s, unimpas-ioned, simple story. No ar gument, no rhetoric, no epithets, no praise* of triends, no denunciation of enemie*, no attempts at concealment. I low strongly these qualities commend the testimony of a witness to the con- j faience of judge and jury is well I known to all who have any experience i in such matter*. Sixth. The statement made by the cvangeli.-t* are alike upon every im portant point, but are different in form aud < xpression, some of them including details which the others omit. Tli -sc variation* make it per fectly certain that there could have been no previous concert between the witne— -, and that each spoke uid • pendeiitly of the otln r-, according to his own conscience anil from bis own knowledge. In considering the testi mony of several witne--e* t.> the -attic transaction, their substantial agree ment upon the main facts, .with cir cumstantial ditl'oroncv* ' r/A detail, is always regard" I a* •< j char acteristic of truth .^Bfhere rub- < \ id< r thau in more of mankind. himself, admits the run. ,>\wf concede* it* soundness. The logical consequence of that admi*sion i* that we are bound to take this evidence a* incontcstably true. But mark the infatuated per versity with which he seek* to evade it. He says that when we claim that the witnesses were inspired, the rule does not apply, because the witne.*es then speak what i* known to him who inspired them, and all mu-t speak ex- j actly the same, even to the minutest detail. Mr. Ingersoll's notion of an inspired witness i* that he i* no wit ill's* at all, but an irresponsible medi urn who unconsciously and involun tarily rap* out or writes down what ever he i* prompted to say. But this i* a faise assumption, not countenanced or even suggested by anything con tained in the .Scriptures. The apostles ami evangelist* are expressly declared to lie witnesses, in the proper sense of the word, called ami sent to testifv the truth according to their knowl edge. If they hail nil told the same story in tho same way, without varia tion, ami accounted tbr it* uniformity by declaring that they were inspired, and had spoken without knowing whether their word* were true or false, where would have been their claim to credibility? But they testified what they knew ; and here comes an infidel critic impugning their testimony IK-- ! cause the impress of truth is stamped upon its face. Seventh. It does not appear that the statements of the evangelists were ever denied by any person who pre tended to know the facts. Many there were in that age and afterward j who resisted the lielief thnt Jesus was the Christ, the Son of (Jod, and only Saviour of man ; but Hi* wonderful works, the miraculous purity of His life, the unapproachable loftiness of Hi* doctrines, Hi* trial and condem nation by a judge who pronounced Him innocent, Hi* patient suifering, Ilia death on the cross, and resurrec tion from tho grnve—of these not the faintest contradiction wa* attempted, i if we except the false nnd feeble story which the ciders and chief priests bribed the guard at the tomb to put in circulation. Kighth. What we call the funda mental truth* of Christianity consist of great public events which are suffi ciently established by history without special proof. The value of mere his toricnl evidence increase* according to the importance of llic facta in •loca tion. their gcucrul notoriety, ami the magnitude oi their viaible eoiiHcuueii coh, C'ornwallis aurrciulercii to \N ash ing ton lit Yorktown, ami changed the deathiy of Kurope und America. No body would think of calling u witness# or even citing an ollicial report to prove it. duliuH t'ic*ur waa u-u.--inutoiut us j back to the Author and Finisher of our faith. The mere hi-.orical evi dence is for these re sons much strong ! er than what we have for other occur ; rences which are regarded us undenia ble. When to this is added the cumu lative evidence given directly and |ssitively by eye witues-es of irre proachable character, and wholly un contradicted, the proof beco nes so strong thut the disbelief we hear of i seems like a kind of insanity. : II Is Ills <-r -rr-.f of tha ovum, j W !.. }| • :■ • 11. re tl.o r{, • !* :.t, I | An I inU't m#n tn<| From the facts cstahlisheil hy this evidence, it follows irresistibly that the gospel has come tw u- from (iod. riiut sileni 'S all reasoning alxnit the wisdom ami ju-tiee of its doctrim-, inee it is im[Hi-.sihle even to imagine that wrong can he done or commanded by that Sovereign Heing whose will alone is the ultimate standard of all justice. Hut Mr. I tiger >oli is still dissatisfied, lie ruis< s objections as tal-e, fieetiug and basele-s as clouds, ami iu-ist# that they are as stable as the mountains, whose everlasting foundations are laid l.y the hand ol the Almighty. I will compress his prop isiti-uis mt,, plain words printed in ilWuv, and, taking a look at his misty creations, let them roll away and vanish into uir, one alter another. < 'iristianitu offers eternal salvation as the reicani of belief ahmr. This is Ik N man and Divine, against him, he hud j better speak in a tone less arrogant. lie does not comprehend how justice ' nnil mercy run he blended together in I the plan of redemption, mnl thin fore j it cannot be true. A thing is not nec- j essarily false because he docs not uii- ' derstand it; he cannot annihilate a principle or fact hy ignoring it. There are many truths in heaven and earth which no man can see through ; for instance, the union of man's soul with his body is not only an unknowable but au unimaginable mystery. Is it therefore false that u connection does : exist between mutter and spirit? How, he u-ks, can tin sufferings of un innocent pri son satisfy justice for the ! •ins oj tin guilty ? This raises a meta physical question, it is not necessary or possible for me to discuss here. A* ; matter of fact, Chri-t died that sin- J tiers might be reconciled to (iod, and I ; in that sells.* Ho died for theiu ; that is, to fiirni-h them with the means ot i averting Divine justice, which their crimes had p'ovofced. II liat, lie again a-k, would u> thiol ot u man uho allowed another man to du Jor a crime which he himself had committed t 1 un-wcr thut u man who, hy any contrivance, cuu-c# bis j own off. n-e to be visited upon the head i of an innocent per-oii i- unspeakably depraved. Hut are Christians guilty of thi* busem-s becau-c they accept the blessing* of an institution which their great benefactor died to estab lish? I,oyulty to the King who has erected a most beneficent government , for us at the cost of His life—fidelity ; to the Master who bought us with Hi hlood —is not the fraudulent suls titu- I ion of an innocent jwr-oii in place of a criminal. The doctrine oj lion rtsi-tancf, for j given em ot injuries, reconciliation with ) enemies, as taught in the .V- w Testa j ment, is the child of u > akne--, dtgrad j nig, and unjust. This is the whole substance of a long, rambling diatriln-, a- incoherent a- a sick man's dream. Christianity doc* not forbid the m <■< - -ary defense of civil -•.< i' tv, or the pro|M-r viudicati n of ] r- mil rights. Hut to cherish animosity, to thirst for mere revenge, to hoard up wrong-, r<-al <>r fancied and lie hi wait tor the chance of paying tlmm lnu k ; to Ire impatient, unforgiving, malieiou>, and cruel to all who have ero—-d u— th ->• dialr dical pro|M.-n■>l and curbed by the authority and -pirit of the fhri-tian religion, and the application of it has converted men from low savages into refined aud eivilizisl In-ings. The punishment oi sinners in eternal hell is cjrrssnr. The future of the -oul i- a subject on which we have very dark views. In our present state, the mind taken in no idea except what is conveyed to it through the Imdily senses. All our conceptions of the spiritual world are derived fr<>m some analogy to material things, and this | analogy must necessarily be very re mote, Irecausc the nature of the sub jects com pa ml is so diverse that a ; close similarity cannot Ire even sii|* po-ed. No revelation has lifted the veil In-tween time ami eternity ; but in -hadowy figures we are warned that a very marked distinction will be made Iretweeti the good and the* bad in the next world. f|ceulative opinions con cerning the punishment of the wicked its nature and duration, vary with the temper and the imaginations of men. Doubtless we are many of us in error; but low can Mr. Ingcrsoll enlighten |us ? Acknowledging no standard of right and wrong ill this world, he can have no theory of reward# and punish- : mcnts in the next. The deed# done in the body, whether good or evil, are nil morally alike in bis eyes, and if there be in heaven a congregation of the just, he #e<* no reason why the worst rogue should not lie a member j of it. It is supposed, however, that j man ha# a soul as well as a body, and that both are subject to certain laws, which cannot lw violat<*d without in curring the proper penalty—or conse quence, if be like* that word bettor. If Christ was (lint. He knew that ! His followers would prosecute and murder men for their opinions; yet he did not forbid it. Them is but one way to deal with this accusation, and that is to contradict it flatly. Noth ing can be conceived more striking than the prohibition, not only of per secution, but of all the nassiona which lead or incite to it. No follower of Christ indulge* in malice even to bis enemy without violating tlie plainest rule of his faith. He cannot love God and bate bis brother; if he says he can, Bt. John pronounces him a liar. The broadest benevolence, uni versal philanthropy, inexhaustible charity, are inculcated in every line of the New Testament. It is plain that Mr. Ingcrsoll never read a chapter ol it; otherwise be would not have ven tured upon this palpable falsification of its doctrines. \\ bo told him that the devilish spirit of persecution was authorized, or not forbidden, by the i Gospel ? The person, whoever it was, i who imposed upon bis trusting ignor- i ance should he given up to the just | reprobation of his fellow-citizens. Christians in modern times carry on l mars of detraction and slander against i our onotlu r. Tlio discussions of theo- . logical subjects by men who believe in the fundamental doctrines of Christ arc singularly free from harshness und abuse. Of course | cannot speak with absolute certainty, but I lielicve most confidently that there is not in all the religious polemics of this cen tury as much slanderous invective as •an Ihi found in any ten lines of Mr. | liigersoH's writings. Of course I do not include |>oliiieul preachers among I my model* of charity aud forbearance. I hey are a mendacious set, but Chris tianity is no more responsible for their misconduct, than it i- for the treachery of .Indus I-eariot or the wrongs done |to Paul by Alexander the copper smith. Hut, says lie, Christians have been guilty of wanton and wicked persecu tion. It is true that soma (lersons, profc-sing < hristianity, have violated the fundamental principles of their 1 j faith by inflicting violent injuries und i i hloodv wrongs upon their fellow-nien. ! Hut the perjs trator- of these outrages i were in fuel not < liri-tiuu* ; they were ' either hypocrites from the beginning or el-e base a[*>stat<-* —infidels or ; something worse—hireling wolves, j i who-e gosjsd was their maw. Not : one of them ever pretended to find a j warrant lor his conduct in any pre- i eept of ( hrist or any doctrine of his j church. All the wrongs of this na ture which history records have been ! the work of politicians aided often by 1 priest* and ministers who were willing to deny their l/.rd und d.-ert to the i enemy for the sake of their temporal i interests, lak"- the ca>.-* most com- | mouly • U'-d and see if tlii- be not a true account of them. The auto da fe of Spain and Portugal, the burning of | Smitlifield, and the whipping of wo men in Massachusetts were the out come of a cruel, false, and antiehris- ' tiun jMiliey. Coligny aud his adher , • ni- were killed hy au order of ('liarh* IX., at the instance of the ' who headed a hostile faction, and merely for r..snl to fnodatt • f thought. The kingdom of < hrist is lias*f upon certain principles to which it repiire tlieas-.-nt of every one who would enter therein. If v own Hi# authority and conform your moral conduct to Hi* law-, you cannot expect that He will admit you to the privileges of His government. Hut naturalization is not tbreesl upon you if you prefer to lw an alien. The Go*|el makes the strongest and tcnder--t np|>eal to the heart, reason, and conscieoct of man —CDtrcat# him to take thought for hi* own highest interest, and by all its moral inllueuec provokes him to gtssl ■ work* ; hut ho i* not constrained hy any kind of dure** to leave the ccr- | vice or relinquish the wages of sin. Is there anything that savors of tyran- j ny in tlii# ? A man of ordinary judg- j tinm will say, no. But Mr. Ingcrsoll thinks it as oppressive as the refusal j of Jehovah to reward the worship of! demon*. The tlosprl of Christ does not satis fy the hunger of the heart. That de ls lids upon what kind of a heart it is. i If it hunger* after righteousness, it will surely Is* filled. It i* probable, also, thai if it hungers for the filthy ! I food of a g'slles# philosophy it will j get what it# appetite demands. That I was an expressive phrase which Car- I vie iimh] when he called modern infi delity "the gospel of dirt." Those who arc greedy to swallow it will doubtless be supplied satisfactorily. Accounts of miracle are always false. Are miracles impossible? No one will say so who ojieus hi* ey<* to the mira cle# of crcatiou with which wc are sur rounded on every hand. You cannot even show that they are a priori im probable. God would he likely to reveal Hi# will to the rational crea ture who wore nsjuired to obey it; He would authenticate iu some way the right of prophets and a|to#tlcs to speak in His name; su|>ernatuial pow er was the broad seal which He affixed to their commission. From this it fol low# that the improbability of a mir acle i# no greater than the original improbability of a revelation, and that is not improbable at all. Therefore if the miracle* of the New Testament are proved by sufficient evidence, we Ivlieve them os we believe any other established fact. They become denia ble only when it is shown that the great miracle of making the world was never performed. Accordingly Mr. lugersoll abolishes creation first, mid thus clears the way to his dog matic conclusion that all miracles ate "the children of mendacity." Christianity is pernicious in its moral effect, darkens the mind, narrows the soul, arrests the progress of human so ciety, and hinders civilisation. Mr. In gcrsoll, as a zealous apostle of the "go*pl of dirt," must b expected to throw a good deal of mud. Hut this is too much; ifr-iujuset himself instead * ,'sl. ' of flailing the object of hin assault. When I answer that all we have of virtue, justice, iutellectual liberty, moral elevation, refinement, Irenevo leuee and true wisdom came to um from that aouree which he revile* a* the fountain of evil, 1 am not merely putting one aaaertion against the oth er; for i have the advantage, which he baa not, of speaking what every tolerably well-informed man known to be true, lie fleet what kind of a world thin wan when the disciple* of Christ undertook to reform it, and compare it with the condition in which their teaching* have put it. In it* mighty metropolis, the centre of it* intellect ual and political power, the best men were addicted to vice* so debasing that I could not even allude to them without soiling the paper I write upon. All manner of' unprincipled wicked tu-RH wa practiced in the private life of the whole population without con cealment or *bame, and the rnagi*- ■ trate- were thoroughly and universal ly corrupt, Benevoleuce in any *ha|o was altogether unknown. The belp less and the w-ak got neither justice ; nor mercy. There wa no relief for ! the |or, no succor for the *iek, no refuge for the unfortunate. In all pagandom there wa* not a hospital, almshouse or organized charity of any -ort. The indifference to human life was literally frightful. The order of a successful leader to a--a--inate hi* oppoaeuts was always obeyed by hi* followers with the utmost alacrity and pleasure. It was a sjjeeiijl amusement of tin tsipulace to witnee- the shows at which men were compiled to kill one another, to l>e torn in piece* bv i wild leasts, or otherwise "butchered to make a lioman holiday." In every ; province paganism enacted the same Cold-blooded cruelties; oppression and robbery ruled supreme; murder went rampaging and red over all the earth. I'he Cliunh came, and her light |* ne trated this moral darkness like a new -tin. She covered the globe with in stitution* of mercy, and thousand* upon thousand* of her disciple* de voted themselves exclusively to work* of charity at the sacrifice of every earthly iuteje-t. Her earliest adher ent* were killed without remorse— Ireheaded, crucified, -awn asunder, thrown to the lx-a>t-, or covered with pitch, piled up in great heaps and -lowly burned to death, But her taith was ma ie jerfect through suf fering, an l the law of love roe in triumph from the ashes of her mar tyr-. Thi- religion ha- c-ome down to u through the ages, attended all the way by righteousness, ju-tiee, temper aniv. mercy, tran-pareut truthfulness, exulting hoj*>, and white-winged char ity. Never wa- it* influence for good more plainly |rc< ptible than now. It ha* not converted. purifies!, ami re formed all men. for it* fir-t principle i* the freedom of the human will, and there are tho*e who choose to reject it. Hut to the ma-- of mankind, directly and indirectly, it has brought un counted benefits and blessing*. Abol ish it —take away the restraint* which it imj-*4*s on evil passions—silence the admonitions of its preacher*—let all Christians a-ase their labor.- of charity—blot out from history the ; records of it* heroic benevolence—re peal the law* it has enacted ami the j institution* it has built up —let its moral principle* be abandoned and its miracles of light Ik- extinguished— i what would we come to ? 1 need not answer this question ; the experiment | has been partially tried. The French nation formally renounced Christian ity, denied the existence of the Su preme Heittg, and so satisfied the hun j ger of the infidel for a time. What followed? Universal depravity, gar ments rolled in blood, fantastic crimen unimagined before, which startled the earth with their sublime atrocity. The American people have and ought to have no special desire to follow that terrible example of guilt and misery. It is impossible to discuss this sub ject within the limits of a review. No doubt the effort to be short has made me obscure. If Mr. Ingersoll think* himself wronged, or his doctrine mis construed, let hint not lay my fault at at the door of the Church, or cast hi* censure on the clergy. "A drum que feci, in me eonccriile ferrum." J. 8. BI.A