SJw Cfitfw geraottnt. BELLEFONTE, PA. The Largest, Cheapest as d Best Paper PUIILIBIIKU IN CKNTIIJC COUNTY. THE CENTRE DEMOCRAT i* pub liliMt *vry Thurmluy morning, at BolJelonte, Cuntre county, FA. TKKMS—Cash in *>\vance SI BO If not paid In advance. 2 OO Payments made within three month* will he con sidered in sdTsnce. A LI VIS PAPER—devoted to the lutereat* of the whole people. No paper will be discontinued nntll •rreriK® > paid, except at option of publishers. Papers goiug out of the comity must be pnid for in Advance. Any person procuring us tencash subscribers will be sent a copy free of charge. Our extensive circulation make* this paper an un usually reliable and profitable medium for nuvertisiiig. We have the most amide facilities for JOII WORK and are prepared to print all kinds of Hooks, Tracts, "rngrammos, Posters, Oomuiervhil printing, Ac., in the iiest style and at the lowest pomtlMe rate*. All advertisement* for a lens term than three month* •JO cents per line for the flrt three insertions, and / cents a line for each additiounl insertion. Special notices one-half more. Kditorial notices 1 .* cents per line. A liberal discouut is made to persons advertising by the quarter, half year, or year, a* follows : *! -* SPACE OCCUPIED. 3 I 5 'J 51 i i line inch (or Pi line* this type) 91 If* 112 Two inches.... 7|lo 1.1 Three Inches...... 1° L" tjniiricr column (or 5 Indies) 1-I'JO 30 Half column (or 10 Inches) tin|:v AA One column (or *1 Inche*) pW|M I'M Foreign advertisement* must be |mid for before in sertion, except on yearly contract*, when half-yearly payment* 111 advance will be required. POLITICAL NOTICSS, IA cents per line each iusertiou. Nothing Inserted fr less than 6o cents. llrsiffß** Sorter*. In the editorial columns, 15 cents per line, each insertion. LOCAL NOTICBH. in local columns, 10 cents per line. THE following is the letter address ed to Hon. Wm. 11. English by the committee of the National Convention, informing iiiui of his nomination, mid the reply of Mr. English : To HON. W. 11. ENGLISH : Dear Sir.- By direction of the Democratic Nation al Convention, which assembled at Cin cinnati, June 2'J, last, it becomes our pleasant duty to notify you that you were selected by that body for the ofiice of Vice President of the United States. Your large experience in the affairs of our government, your able discharge of many trusts committed to your hands, your steadfast devotion to Democratic principles, and the uprightness of your private character, give assurance to the Democracy that you are worthy and well qualified to perform the duties of that high position and commended you to them for the nomination which they conferred. While your personal qualities and your public services merit ed this honor, the action, of course, was no doubt designed not only to vin dicate their appreciation of yourself, but as well to testify their profound respect for the Democracy of Indiana, your native State, with whose many struggles you have been so iong iden tified and in whose glorious achieve ments you have shared, The Conven tion act forth its views upon the leading political issues which are now before the people in a series of resolutions, a copy j of which we have the honor to present to you, and to which your attention is respectfully requested. It is our earn est hope that these views may meet with your approbation, and that you will accept the nomination which is { now tendered you. With sentiments of high esteem, we are, respectfully, JOHN W. STEVENSON, President of the Convention. NICHOLAS M. BELL, Secretary. ENGLISH'S SPEECH. After a few minutes of handshaking, Stockton turned to English and in a few words notified him of his nomina tion, to which the latter replied as fol lows : Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the committee : As a practical business man not accustomed to indirection of action or circumlocution of speech, I will sny plainly and in a few words that 1 accept the high trust which you have tendered me with feelings of profound gratitude, and that I will at an early date formal ly and in writing make the acceptance which I am informed ia usual on such occasions. In doing this I fully realize the great responsibility of the situation, the care, turmoil, anxiety, misrepresen tation and abuse, which are certain to follow, and 1 understand thoroughly that all the resources and power of pol itical foes from all parts of the land will be concentrated against us. In In diana, my native State, where the first grand battle ia to be fought and proba bly the most important of all. But these are great occasions when the dis charge of high patriotic duties is to he considered above all present considera tions, and I shall not disregard the unanimous voice of the representatives of the majority of American people which you speak here taday. (Ap plause. | I am profoundly grateful for the high honor which has been confer red and I have an abiding faith that with the favor of God and of the people we shall succeed in this contest. Garfield at llnme. In 1876, the anti-Gmrfield Republi cans of his own district resolved as follows: "Seventh —Resolved, That we further arraign and denounce James A. Gar field for hia corrupt connection with the Credit Mobilier, for his false denials thereof before his constituents, for his perjured denial thereof before a com mittee of his peers in Congress, for fraud upon bis constituents in circulat ing among them a pamphlet purport ing to set forth the finding of said com mittee and the evidence against him, when in fact material portions thereof were omitted and garbled. "Etghth —Resolved, That we further arraign and charge him with corrupt bribery in selling his official influence as chairman of the committee on appro priations for $5,000 to the De Gotyer pavement ring to aid them in procuring a oontract from the Board of Publlo Works of the District of Columbia; selling his influence to aid said ring in imposing upon the people of said dis trict a pavement which is almost worth less at a price three times its cost, as sworn to by one of tho contractors; selling his influence to aid said ring in procuring a contract, to procure wbick it corruptly paid $07,000 'for influence;' selling bis influence in a matter that in volved no question of law, upon the shallow pretext that he was acting as a lawyer." • 1 - - A Sample Straw. Tho following communication, un der tho head of "A Samplo Straw," appeared in the Philadelphia Record, of last Saturday, and it clearly indi cates the popularity of Hancock with the business and conservative masses of the country: Editor of the Record: 1 have no recollection of a national campaign in which the tide of popular sentiment set so decidedly, so visibly and so entirely without check, in one di rection, as at present. There have been campaigns in which many voters aban doned their political associates and sup ported tho nominees of the rival party. Hut those changes on the eve of elec tions were rarely confined to one party. There were acquisitions in both purties in compensation for defections, gains and losses, of which the balance could not be drawn until the votes were couut ed. In the present contest, from the day, from the hour, of the nomination of General Hancock at Cincinnati, the current has been running continuously in his favor, many prominent Republi cans heartily supporting him, while there have been no counterbalancing changes from the pnrty that nominated and supports bin*. An incident occur red a few days ago illustrative and char acteristic of the party politics of to-day. A number of gentlemen, Democrats and Republicans, met casually at a ho tel on Fourth street, in this city, and were exchanging some good-tempered banter on politics. One of the party, a Democrat, alluded to the peculiarity of the present contest in the particular to which I have referred. He proceeded to name more than a score of hitherto active, prominent, influential Republi cans, merchants, manufacturers, known to all who were present, who were open ly supporting General Hancock. A Re publican remarked, in reply : "Oh, that amounts to nothing ; there are changes at every election, Hancock will no doubt lose as many as he will gain, and in the end the swaps and changes will be about even." "Do you know the Republicans I have named ?" inquired the Democrat. "I know them all,' 1 was the reply. "Are they avowedly and actively for Hancock?" "Well—yes!" "Can you name me Democrat who will vote for Garfield ?" The one Democrat was not named. Itehold Ills Record. ClrarfleM K<'i'ullunn. There is nothing that so hcassly dis counts the public career of the Radical nominee for President as the testimony of his own party friends and organs. We call to the witness stand the editors of the New York Timet and the Tribune. the two lending Radical organs, and all that we ask ttie reader to take in is what they said about tho Credit Mobil ier fraud at the time the crime was be ing inve-ligated by Congress, a body composed of two-thirds Republicans. We are particular in giving the dates when the organs in question uttered the naked truth. <*f course, the edi tors at that time never dreamed that Garfield would be nominated for Presi dent. Read what they then said about their present nominee. The statements below are not Democratic lies, but Rad ical truths, uttered when the hearts of the writers possessed the fncts, nnd gave impartial utterance: From the New York Time*, February 19, I*7-1. Messrs. lv-'lly and Garfield present a most distressing figure. Their participa tion in the Credit Mobilier affair is compli cated by the most untortunutc contradic tions of testimony. From lie- N.w Y.>rk Tlmv, FLmarjf 20,1*73. The character of the Credit Mobilier was no secret. The source of its profits was very well known at the time Congress man bought it. Though Oakes Ames may have succeeded in concealing hi* own mo tive, which was to bribe Congressmen, their acceptance of the stock was not on that account innocent. The dishonor of the act, as a participation in an obvious fraud, still remains. Some of thein have indulged in testmony with reference to the matter which has I been contradiets-sl. The committee die \ tine.tli/ rejce.lt the tettimrmy of teveral oj the i member. The* can only be. done on the j ground that it it untrue. Hut untrue tet ! iimony given undrr oath it morally, \J not legally, perjury. It is thsi clear duty of Congress to visit with punishment all who took Creslit Mo bilier stock from Oakes Anna. From the New York Tribune, F*i. I*7ll. Jame* A. Garfield, of Ohio, had ton shares ; never paid a dollar; received $829, which, afts-r the investigation began, he was anxious to have considered as a loan from Mr. Oakes Ames to himself. Well, the wickedness of all of It Is that these men betraycsl the trust of the people, deceived their constituents and, by evasions and falsehosids, confessed the transaction to be disgraceful. From ths N.w York Tribune, Feb. jr., IHT.'L Mr. Ames establishes very clear!v the point that ho was not alone in this otfonso. If he it to be erpelted for bribery, the men toho icere bribed thould go uritb him. Reader, remember the 7WP remark : "Mr. Garfield presents a most distress ing figure." And the Tribune: "James A. Garfield of Ohio, had ten shares ; never paid a dollar," and, "If Ames is to be expelled for bribery, the men who were bribed should go with him," Con gress did not heed the remarks. Aines was expelled, and it killed him. But Garfield, Kelley A Co. still hold seats in Congress, and the former has the impu dence to ask the honest voters of this country to elect him President. Well, that won't happen. Bubpwoaa were issued .Saturday and are now being served on witnesses in the case of George 8. Smith, of Phila delphia, and Christian ]x>ng and K. J. MoCune, of Hhippensburg, charged with corrupt solicitation of members of the Legislature, An effort will be made to have these cases tried at the October term of court. General Garfield's Defense. From I'lillstlelplil* Tltn. A campaign life of General Garfield, written by Colonel Russell H. Connell, of Massachusetts, gives General Gar field's defense of his Credit Mobilier business. Colonel Connell spent some days at General Garfield's residence gathering data for bis campaign life of the Republican candidate for President, and as the statement given about the Credit Mobilier transactions is in the first person it mAy be accepted as Gen. Garfield's official answer to the grave accusations which have con fronted him in his national contest. We copy elsewhere the circumstantial statement made b> General Garfield, and there will bo very common regret among fair-minded men of all parties that he has attempted any explanation if ho could not ofler one more satisfac tory than that given through Colonel Connell. It is plausible as far as it goes, hut its fatal defect is in the fact that it omits the two most vital features of the charges he assumed to expluin. He is entirely silent on the only docu mentary evidence that appear* to sus tain Mr. Ames and condemn General Garfield, and that is a memorandum, presented to the committee by Mr. Ames, purporting to be in General Gar field's own handwriting, claiming much more than he had received on his Credit Mobilier stock. If that memorandum was in General Garfield's handwriting, there is no escnpe for him from either the charge of purchasing the stock or the more serious charge of deliberately falsifying to exculpate himself from his error. The testimony of Mr, Ames on this point was given on the 291h of Januury, 1873, as follows : Q. You may state whether, in conversa tion with you, Mr. Garfield claim*, as he claimed before us, that the only transaction between you was borrowing S3OO. A. No, sir ; he did not claim thst with inc. tj. State all that occurred in conversa tion between you. A. 1 have had two or three interviews with Mr. Garfield., lie wants to put it on the basis of a loan. (j. Did he claim that it was in fact a loan ? A. No, he did not. ij. State all you know in reference to it. A. I told him ho knew very well that that was a dividend. 1 made out a state ment and showed it to him at the time. Iu one conversation he admitted it, and said, a* noar as I can remember, there was $2,400 due in stock and bonds. Ho made a little memorandum of SI,OOO and 1,400, and, as I recollect, there was SI,OOO of Union Pacific Railroad stock, SI,OOO of Credit Mobilier stock, and S4OO of stock or bonds, I do not recollect what. Ij. When wa* that memorandum made? A. It was made In my room. It was since this investigation commenced. 1.1 Have you the memorandum that Mr. Garfield made ? A. 1 have the figures that he made. [Paper shown to the committee contain ing figures, as follows :] SI,OOO 1,400 $2,400 You snv these figure* wcro made bv Mr. Garfield"? A. Yes, sir. (2- That was his idea of w hat was com ing to him ? A. Yes, sir. tj How did you happen to retain that little stray memorandum ? A. I do not know. I did not pay any attention to ft at the time, until I found there was to be conflict of testimony, and I thought it might be worth preserving. General Garfield never appeared he fore the committee after the foregoing testimony had been given hy Mr. Ames, thu* leaving the aworn statement that the memorandum wit* in his own hand writing uncontradicted. He subsequent ly issued an address to hi* constituent*, many of whom had revolted against hi* re election, in which he denied that he had purchased or agreed to purchase the stock, hut he did not allude to the damaging memorandum, and now his formal defense presented for the Presi dential campaign, is also silent on the point. Until General Garfield can deny the genuineness of the memorandum, which as yet i* undisputed, all attempU at explanation of the Credit Mobilier transaction must be worse than failures. Another strange omission in hi* de fense is his failure to take any note of the unanimous finding of the Republi can committee that reported to the House February 18, 1873, through -Tudge Poland, a* follow*: The fact* in regard to Mr. Garfield, a* found hy the committee, are that be agreed with Mr. Ames to take ten shares of Credit Mobilier stock, but did not pay for tho same. Mr. Atnes received the eighty per cent, dividend in bonds and sold them for ninety-seven percent., and also received I the sixty per cent, cash dividend, which, together with tho price of the stock and Interest, left a balance of $329. This turn wa* paid over to Mr. Garfield by a check on the Sergeant-at-Arms, and Mr. Garfield then understood tbi* sum wa* the balance of dividends after paying lor the stock. General Garfield was then, a* new, a member of the house, but he made no protest on the floor agAinst the judg ment of his political friends who thus condemn him. This report and the testimony of Mr. Ames in regard to General Garfield'* memorandum of Credit Mobilier profits due to him are the two apparently conclusive facts against him, and they are the two points which he passes in silence in offering his defeuse to his countrymen. Another strange omission in General Garfield's defense must attract very general attention. In his explanation of the De Golyer fee of five thousand dollars, paid him for presumed profes sional services, he is strangely silent on the solemn judicial decisions of two courts distinctly condemning his fee as corrupt and illegal. In a suit brought in the Cook county Circuit Court of Illinois, to recover the full amount of the corruption fund for the Washington paving contraots, of which General Gar field's fee was a part, the defense de murred on the ground that the money claimed was promised to influence the official action of General Garfield, chair man of the Committee on Appropria tions. through whose official tavor the fraudulent contracts bad to be paid by government appropriations. Judge Farwell sustained the demurrer because such contract with General Garfield was corrupt and could not be legally enforced. The trial was bad at Chirago in May, 1875, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United NUtes, where Justice Nwayne delivered the opinion of the court in fJctober, 1879, in the following language : Tho agreement with General Oarflold, a member of Congress, to pay him $6,000 as a contingent fee for procuring a contract, which was itself made to depend upon a future appropriation hy Congress—which appropriation could only cotne from u commlttco of which he was chairman— was a sale of ollicial influence, which no veil enn cover againgt the plainest princi ples of public policy. No counselor-at-law while nolding high office (much less a minister of tho Gospel, etc.) ha* a right to put himself in a position of temptation, and under prctoneoof making a legal argu ment exort his ollicial influence upon pub lic officer* dependent upon his future no tion. Certainly tho courts of justice will never lend themselves to enforce contracts obtained by such influence. General Garfield cannot be ignorant of the fact that the judicial records of our highest courts have stamped the De Golyer fee with infamy, and if lie had any explanation to oiler on the subject, he should have met these fearful judi cial deliverances against him—the most important of which was given by a Re publican Supreme-Judge from his own State. Upon the whole, it would have been better for General Garfield to bo silent on all charges than to have attempted to answer tbem and yet be silent on the points which most conclusively condemn him. Hancock a Soldier, Statesman, and Constitutional Lawyer. In a speech delivered at Columbus, < >hio, on tlie 26th ult., Senator Thurman said : "There is not a man in this audience, there is not a boy in this audience, who doeH not know that Wintield Scott Han cock was ono of the brightest, the ab lest and most daring and brave of all the soldiers that went to the war to maintain the Union. (Applause.) No man wdio ever commanded an army j ever displayed more courage, more he roism, or ever displayed more skill than Hancock displayed from the time tie went into the war until it was closed in triumph. Everybody knew that ; but there is one tiling thnt everybody does not know. Hancock has been in the army nil his life, and therefore you might not at once suspect what is liter ally the truth, that Hancock is not only a soldier, but he is a constitutional law yer and it good American statesman. (Cheers.) 1 call him an American statesman, i call him a constitutional lawyer, and I have warrant for what 1 ssy. For when, after the close of the rebellion, be was placed iu> military Governor of 1/tuisiana and Texas before they were admitted to representation in Congress and to exercise their rights as States, be showed in great contrast to what some other military Governors showed. He showed he knew there was such a thing a* a free republic; that be knew that the true, essen tial and vital doctrine of every free re public, and every free government, is thai the military must be subordinate tothecivil power—(Cheers)—and hence, although in-sieged by a ravenous horde of carpet-baggers to lend the aid of the military to their meditated wrongs and oppression* he said, "No;" that ttial by jury was the right of all American citi zens— ( Applause.)—equal justice in the courts is the right of the American citi xen; freedom from unlawful arrest is the right of an American citizen, and 1 will not use the American flag, or Am erican sword, or American bayoliet, or American soldier to deprive the people of these rights. (Cheers.) I fought them in the war, and no man harder. I helped to put down the rebellion—no man did more according to his ability and bis occasion—but now that the re iiellion is put down, that is peace all over the land ; now that the Consti tution is obeyed in every nook and cor ner ; now that not a hostile hand is rai.ed against the Government of the United Suites, I will be no party to op pressing the people by unconstitutional measures. That is what in efl'ecl Gen. Hancock aaid." - What Hus the Credit Mohillerl This question is frequently aked. The New York Journal of 1 'ommerer in anwer, says. "The original Credit Mo bilier was a joint stock company found- I ed in Paris on November 18, 1862, to do a banking business, to facilitate the construction of public works, and to de velop national industry. It was called by Mr. Berryer 'the greatest gambling house the world bas ever seen.' It dealt in everything, it 'promoted' every thing. it divided as hich as 41 per ceut. per annum to iu stockholder*, it made all iu managers enormously rich, but it came to grief, and in 1867 went into liquidation. The Credit Mobilier of America was organized in 1863, with a capital of two and a half millions. In January, 1873, the charter was pur chased by a company authorized to con struct the Union Pacific railroad, and the stock was increased to $3,760,0tX). This rose to great value (the profits being made chiefly out of the construc tion of that thoroughfare) and enor mous dividends were declared. In 1872 in the course of some legal pro ceedings in Pennsylvania it came out that certain members of Congress and the Vice President were either secretly or openly connected with it as stock holders. Congress investigated the scan dal. The Senate committee made a re port reoommending the expulsion of an implicated Senator, and censuring others, but aa his term expired in five days no action wan taken on it. In the House resolutions oensuriog two mem bers were passed." Several prominent persons were im plicated in the dishonorable work of bribing Congressmen, and ,Senator Pat terson, Speaker Colfax, Congressman Kelly, and JAMES A.GARFIELD were all proven guilty of receiving stock as a conjugation for political faoort. For proof of thia aasertion examine the retard* of Ooagrtu and filtt of the New York 7Vi bunt and Time*. A despatch from Dreville, says the business portion of Gibsonville, Sierra county, Cal., was burned last Thursday moaning. Lost over $50,000. Miss Ida Wellington, of Erie, was thrown down and badly bitten, on Fri day, by a large pet dog that haa hither to been very docile. Senator McDonald on Indlumi. Interview In N>w Turk "I haven't a doubt that wo shall car ry Indiana by 10,000 majority," aaid the Senator. " What? in October?" " In October." The writer expressed surprise at the anticipation of HO decisive a result. "There in no mystery about it," aaid Senator Mcl>onald. "The Democracy of the Slate are united more absolute ly perhaps than they could have been on any other ticket, save, of course, one headed by Mr. Hendricks. Hancock, though an Eastern man, is absolutely unobjectionable, and the compliment paid to Indiana in the nomination of Mr. English is another strong reason for unanimity there. Mr. English is highly respected hy our people and deservedly popular. Besides, he has been 'out of politics,' HH the phrase is, for many years. That is to say, he has not been a candidate for any ofiice. Nevertheless he has not ceased to take a lively inter est in political affairs. So thai, while he has not been identified with any of the recent party feuds, local or othei wise, which might have created against him personal heartburning or party jealousy, the people huve always known "where to find him.' " "Mr. English's nomination is satisfac tory to Mr. Hendricks?" "Entirely." "Reports have been directly to the contrary." "I have already said that Governor Hendricks is heartily committed to him. So am I. So, undoubtedly, is Senator Voorhees. In fact, there is but one sen timent among Democrats throughout the State—a sentiment cordially indors ing the whole ticket as one which the party everywhere will be certain to vote for victoriously in November. Our Orphan Schools. lUitiitmrK SsturJajr Kl(Lt. The old war Governor, Andrew G* Curtin, as he stood with us last week at the reunion of the I'ennsylvania Re serves, called to mind the sympathetic incident thut was the inception of our Soldier Orphan Schools, i >ll the night of November 20, 18G3, two soldier nr phans came to the doors of the Kieou live Mansion and asked for bread. The Governor's wile took them in, fed them, and car.-d for them for the night, and told her husband of the incident. From this came the institution of Soldier or phan School*—to tare for those who could not care for themselves, and Pennsylvania, through her Governor, never instituted a nobler institution. To-day the happy little fellows in vaca tion, from t'atnp Hill and Mount .toy, are on our street*, and woe be to the man, woman or child of tn-iter fortune, who would deny the beniznn these joor children receive from the State a bounty. Official returns of tbo census sujiervi or give* Boston's populstiou at 363,666. an increase of 77,066 in ten year*. Xctf A*lverti*ementM. THOROUGH EDUCATION —roa— V <)U N(1 LADIES. Hollidaysburg Seminary, lIoLLIDAYHBI BLAIft OOt MTV, PKSN A. A healthful lor* Hog , wiffrmti'lingt Offer* Uf yctißf Iftiiir* all the adnnlaifet at'brUtlaii home, with Ifcotouifh 'ttinr of the!r< (lots* It Die higher Lnu Lwe of nlw lmt Term*, 1250.00 por Annum, lo< lHn in all KUiciiah Mu*k atiU avl ealra. ANNUAL TERM, FORTY WEEKS. For atalogm , with full Information, aiklrnw W P. 11U8SKY, A. M , Principal. Executor's Notice. IKTTERH testamentary on the en- J tat# "f J f| |i Ilreen. Je *a#esl, lafe of Mileetmif Ik.rtoigh. Centre enmity. Pa . hartvig twa granted to the auiletaitieil. all perorma indeltH to aaid etui# to make lajrmcnt, Mb! all lusting claim* ac*ittl the asm* In |tv-*nt lhn. duly authenticated h? law, far os-tllement J M < RhhV. I _ l > rorra URSIX, ) *tacaUra. Auditor's Notice. I N the Orphans' Court of Centre f'Vttly. la tl, rx.lUr at U out. of CHRISTINA NKKHK, Asccased: The undersigned, appointed to make dis till.*tl,.n of (hr fund. In th* hand* of lh SdmlnMr. tor |*dnt ai.nt at th. olHcaof Al-xamUr A Ho-r, In Il.llaft>la on SATI'RUAY, August 14. at lOo'rlnrk. A M "*• R1.1.1S I. OR Via, Auditor. Auditor's Notice. r PIIE undersigned, an auditor ap- I. pointsd th. Orphan.' O.nrt of <>ntr OnntitT. to dl.tiibut. tl> fund. In th. hand* of Frod.rlrk Kurt*, admlnl.tralor of Ihitld Ark.r, dw'd.. to and amons th|HMlnl to I. prownl and praaml thnt claim, or h. daharrnl frtwn innlti, In for a .bar. of aatd fonda. (Mk-Sw] 11. A. McKKK. Auditor pOURT PROCLAMATION. Vy W IIKRRAH, th. Ron. i'harlro A. Maj.r, Fmat d.nt of tli. Court oft onimon Fls** of thrlsth Jndk-ial District, conalaUtic of th. roonUaa of Onlrv, Clinton sod Clanrfl.ld, and tha lion, Samn.l Vranrk and tha Hon. John Wtrw, Amx-tot. Jadtn In (Vntrr romtr having iaaurd Ih.lr ptwpt, 'oxaHng oifiGvJ by • ihl Court t< rilake dietrthutton of the fund# in U, hiii'U of JOHN MIIAKEK, Adrnlnivtritor of mil) d#- cedent to iiid ■Bionr lliw iegiJiy entitled theret -111 Attend to th*- 'iulir* of his Rpp"iutrn fit nt hi# lifflo- 111 Ik llrfollfe, Otl M\ I' A V All|(l|( 'J, it I-3w WM r II KIN LK. Auditor. Filial Account. "VTOTK'F in hereby given that tlx* X lirtt iiid fitiil i" >uiit of G#-rge A lex in-1. r OrfilOllttee o* |t#d-#fC |—l lu j-..t : lli-n--along oili-r land ul d-<:Ma-d tt. .'l2 d-g. K., 1.2 |-'f .In put In tail- tll-b— along wild I alii- b. .'7 J-g. W. 'id pr to at on-a ; tli-ui- N *ij| d-g. W. loaj p., to p!a-- of lirglnnlng—tog-tli rr aaitii <1 aif-a an t l'n i-i laud I—itiglit li in Vtllaon l.. laitindi-l I , 11-nrjr M—# on !h- at.-at. Lvon. M>rti A Co. on aooll.. Irvln Hi ma on Hi- rail, and adjoining tli- al-iv- d ■ actll—d land—containing In all .aa. A Oil lib and |:>- I'IRi'IIKb, in or- -.r l-a. Ilai ng tli-rm.n r-t-d a laigo BRICK MAKbJON B'M'fK, I .rg- lUnk llaio Ilagofi blind. with all cotia-nl-iil and nm—a.ary out building. and impnia-ui.nu. and ha et/'laee IbeVili nh>li/ Uud of W-4cr #. dr# L Ijd|*er. i |-it then' ilonir Killer iod %flt/h !!'• Ulid -II f.'tf H* I'JT per T. ihitMt; thence S ' 7 def. W. \* r to pat; thne ■ lour line f f.'trrii No. 1 S ' niike di#tril#uti"ti "f the UUik* in the Uhdi "f J I ftiugeft, luq . Aaeiftiee of John < Qltin. iUclig U.e f Iflitoll iQd th.Mn# JegjiJif eutitied iklftll, wIU ItUhd to thi dalle* of hie wj p -ititriirnt to the Court rnotn et lU if# f<>tte. .! Ti KMAY. the .VI iti tnt# r*wid re V (Hike tkeir rlxliM l<4rr iiid Auditor or !t-a-nt aaiu- of lb- pmp-rta Any p rtnai of th- | ni.l|.aj -an > tai l off al any llin-. and II baa laa-n tli- nati.n. of th. . .11.pan.i to p-rtnit th- pntxlpal to —main a. long a. th- barrovnr oiahaa, if tha lai-t-n i. piotuntly pa-l All 1) I" f'llAßl.fy f MIF.HMAN Alton.-vat la. ATI Omit .li t. R-ading. ft , it to DA VIA 1! K LIS K, Co . A|ipraU-i. i-tI R-11-fonl-. p, WHO WANT GROCERIES A Nil OTHI.It SUPPLIES roit I I A It V EST I X Ci HHOCLII ( A 1.1. ON SECHLER&Co. OR ANVTIIINO IK TIIR UXK Of SUGARS Y)FKEI-N. TEAS. 8II< ES. NEW CHEESE, 8. C. HAMS, S. C. DRIED BEEF. BREAKFAST BACON. DRIED PEACHES, NEW PRUNES, HOMINY RIHI RICE, BYRUFB and N. O. MOLASSES, NEW MACKEREL, STON EW A RE, 0 C EENSW Ali K, Ac., Ac., Ac. AKTTHTKO IN TIIK LINK or FRESII MEATS. e r! Killing Onll-fad atonra of from 1200 to 11001b#., and biv |M*ftiv<-ly (lie BEST MEATS that are rffrrod for m) in Ccntr county. SECHLER at Ct). GROCERS. Btuh House Block, Bellcfontc, Pn. WtOBOK W. THOMAS RECEIVED another lot of FRESH MACKEREL. And to ha cold at u.nal toe prtima ■ Qt'ARTKRAat.— (1 M | KlT*at JUk. eaODOf'R ukaa la .trkaagt fcr gocata ff PATENTB. |>ATENTS procured upon Inven- I liooa. ffn AnaMft'l VtM 111 ATt*r*. Ont :^^T^D^AV\rDKffL"K^T • INVENTORS J** " • Wjfcl #f par Itntdn, arlth yoar m daatHpUoa of lb for w aa to (mlantaMllty. J" ™ i'i* Pmw b Bttcrmta. Oat Raok of laalmrth.B. Ac., "Ho* to rmrii Pttwn." Ml m an o-g*aa - aiao aaatpl. .-..jdaa of tha Bcisa rtne Ranoa*. Dm I nam lon' JnaVal K. a A. P. LACKY, latent Attorneys, S rut, Mr Ral-nt ORhm. Waaßlngton. D. C,