AMERICAN'WLUNTEER, PDDLtsiIED TUOUSDAY MOnNINO DY John U* .JttraUon. terms Scdsobiptjon.— Onft Dollar and Fifty Cents, paM in advance i Two Dollars II paid within the y«ar* and Two Dollars and Fifty Conte, If not paid Vlllilri the year. Those terms wilt bo rig idly adhered to in every instance. No sub scription discontinued until, all .arrearages are paid unless at tho option of the Editor.' Apv.BBTiSBiiRNTs —Accompanied by the cash, and not exceeding one square, will be inserted tliroo tlrads for One Dollar, and twenty-five cents for each additional insertion. Those of agreat tor length In proportion. Jod-FniNTiNa —Such as ITand-bllls, Posting bills, Pamphlets, Blanks, Labels, &c., &c., exe cuted with accuracy and at tho shortest notice. SPEECH SENATOR BIGLER, Mnrcil ta tbe D. S. Senate, Monday, De iciubcr 8. tub president's message The Senate resumed tho consideration of the following order, submitted by Mr. Fitzpatrick, on the 2d inst. ; Ordered, That the message and accompanying documents be printed; and that fifteen thousand Additional copies be printed for tho use of tho Senate. Mr. Bigler. Mr. President, T had not antic ipated tho renewal of the slavery discussion at ihls early day of Iho session : indeed, sir. I had Ijopcd that this thread-worn topic would be permit'ed to sleep at' least for a short season after the presidential struggle. Like the Sena tor from Louisiana. I felt quite happy in this belief; but it is otherwise. The President in his closing message deemed it proper to pm his views on the subject of slavery agitation cm re cord, and the Senators on the other side have availe 1 themselves of (he occasion to open up the entire Held of controversy. I for one have desired to avoid it, and should not have said one word had it not been for the frequent and pointed reference mndo to the character of the late presidential canvass in my own .State by the Senators from’ Ohio and Massachusetts. — Honorable Senators on the other side, whilst deprecating the course of the President in dis cussing ilu 1 subject, readily concluded to follow hi.s example. Lamenting the use of senUuu n's on his part which they deem ungenerous, if not unjust fowrrds their party, their pi mnpl.-s, and the tendencies of their measures, tlwy indulge to a still greater extent in the practice them selves. Condemning what they arc plensid to regard ns n want of official courtesy to this de partment of the Government and to a largo class of the people, they promptly violate nil these rules in the seventy of their own criti cisms. Even the Senator from Mainfc. so dis tinguished for the propriety of his language, has spoken of the President as an unworthy son of a free Stale ; and the Senator from Ohio has been still more severe. But these exhibitions only furnish another evidence of the fallibility of our nature : aud'dhow how difficult it is for, even the best of us to refrain from the commis sion of ihe wrongs wc th nk we see in others. — Such things, however, arc not uncommon.— Very many teachers in morals, politics, and even religion, utterly fail in the practice of the W'so and holy precepts which they lay down , for the observance of others. But, sir, I do not intend to circumscribe my self in what little I have to say by complaints against the course of others. I think the Pro fildeiU was right in expressing his views as he has done; ami of course, Senators have a right to criticise the act. But I cannot agree tint this art of iho Pre sident is unprecedented. If lam not mistaken President Jackson discussed the question of a 'national bank in such a nmfiner ns to correct i the misrepresentations of Ins political oppo » uenis. President Polk iliscmsed the question 7 of war with Mexico in the same spirit. It is » the right and duty of the President to inform Congress of the slate of the Union : and enter laining the views he does ns to the dangerous tendencies ol the doctrines of certain political parlies in the country, the obligation on the present Executive to communicate his appre hensions became imperative. Senators may scout and discard the reasoning of that ofilcer, hut they should remember that PreMdent Washington, even in his early day. fell required to warn the people against the dangerous ten dencies of geographical parlies in our country, ami eOorts to array one section of the country against another ; and that Thomas Jillerxin compared this sectional agitation to the start ling alarm of a llrc-bell in the night. Nor, sir. will exceptions to the language used hy iho President serve to break the force of his over whelming argument in support of what he re gards as thotruo policy of the nation. 1 agree, sir, that the criticism of the action of a large class of his foliow-citi/.ens hy the President.and the condemnation of the tendency of such ac tion. however strongly qualified in proteclives of the motives of the actors, is a most delicate task, and should only be performed on great occasions : but the President has confined his strictures to partisan lenders—men seeking po litical power by means that would hazard the peace of the country; and 1 think that the peo ple w£l agree that they deserve the rebuke. But, sir. it is not my purpose to defend the President. This has already been done with more ability than I can command. This much I will say. however—now that he is near the end of Jus form of office, and when my motives cannot be misunderstood —that I believe (fiat time and experience will prove the wisdom of most of his measures, and that the day is not far in the future when the purity and patriot ism of his motives will be acknowledged by all. But. sir, Senators have been endeavoring to determine what questions have been settled by the result ol the late election, some taking ex ception to the definition as given by the Pr*in dent: and on this point I have a word lo say. I am quite sure, sir. that one great fact sul lied by the result is. that James Buchanan is lo lie the President for four years from the 4th of March next, and that John U. Breckinridge "ill be Vico President for alike period. An oilier hi ill more potent fact is, that tha princi ples of the Democratic party, os defined at Cin cinnati Kml expounded by Mr. Buchanan—the most prominent feature being that the people of Iho Slates who go into Iho Territories shall en joy the right to determine the character of their own local institutions in their own wav, inclu ding that of domestic slavery—arc lo bo in the Ascendency till the year Ititil. Another fact ns distinctly settled is, that the modern and mis called Republican party, against which the no mocracy contended, has been found in a minor ity in 23 out of the 31 Stoles, and has been re jected in tho Union by a popular majority of not less than one million three hundred ami «w:Hty-flvc thousand, being a minority of more than all tho'votcs cast for their candidate ; and in a minority in the northern Stales alone of near two hundred thousand. Another is. that the modern American, or ICnow-Nolhing parly, With its intolerant dogmas of faith, and against whloh the Democracy also contended, has been repudiated in 30 out of the’3l Stales, and by a popular minority of over two millions. But tho result seems to be misunderstood even by Senators. The Senator from New- Hampsliiro has evidently not liked the returns of the election well enough to look at them, or ho would not claim a largo majority for the Republicans in eleven States, when the figures show that they were in ft minority in all but fight.. lie certainly ought to have known that there was a popular majority against Mr, Pro- Piotjt iq Now York of over forty-Hvc thousand, find in Ohio of eleven thousand, and In lowa ,of one hundred and fifty thousand. lie and otli» * p Senators sccn> 10. bo under lljc impression their party camo very near carrying all the free States. Tho Senulor from Ohio said, the other day, that they would have done so had the issue been fairly put on tho Democratic BY JOHN B. BRATTON. VOL. 43, side. The Senators from Maine said they would have succeeded had the vote been a fair one. Why, sir, the figures indicate differently. Out of 460.000 voles in Pennsylvania their candidate received but 147,447 votes, leaving him in a minority of more than 165.000. Ho was also in a minority of 43,695 in New Jersey, 46.089 in Indiana, 46.615 in Illinois, and from the returns we have from California, he has not received more than one fourth of the popular vote in that Stale, claimed to be bis own. Whatever consolution and encouragement they can draw from such figures I leave them to en joy. They.certainly cannot claim fellowship with the Fillmore vote, for Mr. Fillmore was himself amongst the first to denounce them ns a sectional party, attempting to maintain doc trines and practices that would most certainly dissolve the Union. But they deny that their party is sectional, and make the charge of sectionalism against the Democracy. Well, Mr. President. I shall not consume much time on this issue; hut. sir.} if the Republican be not a sectional party, I would be glad to learn how a party can be sec- tional. I cannot conceive what characteristics 1 or practices of a sectional party the Republican ; party lacks. Both of their candidates were: from one section of the Union, they were nomi- | nated by delegates from the same section and I they received nil their votes in that section. In 1 fifteen of the States, differing from the others only as to one local institution, their party made no serious attempt to gel vo'e;. but they endeavored to gain power by exciting prejudice and passion in the popular mind in their own section against a local institution of the o’her. Ilmv else could you constitute a sectional par ly f It sectional, disime 1y anil dangerously sectional, and ii is nse’ess fur Sena'or* to deny i*. It is just the kind of organization which the greatest and best man who evir lived in our country nmicipnted whh alarm. But it is fai otherwise with the Democracy. One of our candidates was from the North, and theothn fiom the South. They were nomina ted hy delegates from all the Slates. Their party declared principles and policy acceptable to the whole family of States. Those princi ples could bo expounded alike in all. and ora tors from the Nonh and the South met daily on the same stand to do so. A constant theme was the equality of (lie Stales, the constitution al rights of all, and the necessity for fraternity of feeling amongst the people of all. How idle ami fallacious the charge of sectionalism against such a party ! But, Air. President, the Senator from Ohio, in the course of the debate the other day, in, support of the charge, that the Democracy in i the North had not stood up fairly and full to 1 the issues between the parlies, remarked ; “In the Slate of Pennsylvania, in all the Democratic mass meetings for President that I ; know mi) thing about, there was inscribed in l great letiers upon their banners, •Buchanan, Breckinridge, and free Kansas ami their ora tors proceeded to show that Mr. Buchanan was safer on the subject of freedom in Kansas than any other candidate.*’ In the same connection, the Senator from Massachusetts staled that, 10 his personal knowledge. “ Public meetings were called of persons in favor of Buchanan, Breckinridge, and fn.T Kan sas. I have rend these calls. F have in my possession one of them, winch was issued in the State of Pennsylvania. There arc others in the possession of members of tins house or iho mb-, or. Throughout the whole canvass in these I very Slates the issue was blinked ” I Meetings were calhd of the friends of “ Bu chnnan, Breckinridge, and free Kansas ! - ’ and banners were Ivirnc in the canvass bearing the j inscription —“ Buchanan. Breckinridge, and , free Kansas !" Well Mr. President, this is no ! very grate charge after all. 1 see no cause of ! alarm in it. I must confess, however, to some [ surprise at jbe sweeping stotnuenl of the Sen ator from Ohio, that in all the Democratic 1 meetings in Pennsylvania of which he had any , knowledge, he discovered the peculiar banner , of which he lias spoken. Such banners may, l have been numerous—certainly there were 'some ' for the Senator saw them : but I cannot re- i member to have seen nny, though I certainly witnessed quitena much of the canvass in Penn } sylvama as be did. His opportunities at Dem- I ocratio meelings.it seems to me. must have' been somewhat limited. I can Imrdiv imagine ] hmv lie gut to such a meeting or bow lie found the opportunity to scrutinize Dunoornlic mol-! locs. lam quite certain he was not inviied to ! our meetings : and I know the Senator too i well to believe that he would go where he was | not welcome. He says he endeavored to en lighten the Democracy on certain points. That ' was kind on hts part: but. doubtless. Mr. President on the receipt of the election returns the honorable Senator concluded that he faded in the task. Again, and in the same connection, he rc marked : ■•Thousands. yea. hundreds of thousands of rotes, were gmm for the successful candidate on the hypothesis that whut was inscribed on llicii banners and wliiu fell from the mouths of their orators was true.” Why. certainly, Mr Pro.sid '"ade it the basis of appeal flbf votes for Mr. Wade. I want to know what Mr Hu* ' their candidate. ,'T | ehnnnn’s opinions an- in regard In the roustitn* | The Senator from Massachusetts says tlial lional difficulty which has been so often spoken I he members of the House who vplfrd for Mr of ? Dunn s lull last session pro Slavery Mr Bigler. 1 cannot answer the Senator ft< men in the canvass. I never heart any such to Mr. Buchanan's views of tbe eonsnt iitimnd nll.giaiion. It is true, that in fop|y to the question. I can give my own, if the Senn or is eba geso constantly made by thc-Jr/cmont pnr . willing io bear tin in. : ly. that ibe Democrats were seeking to increase j Mr. Wade. Well, let us have your opinions, •'slavery, we said that the only Attempt that j if you please. | had ever been made to Increase Slfcry hv an | Mr. Bigler. Uis no new proposition that 1 nc ‘ °f Congress was that of '(hepjlepubhcan ‘ the Sknator from Ohio has presented. It has members of the House who votcvfor .Dnnn’s J been here before, and discussed before : and I j bill. Tins we did say : and became that bill j ; endeavored, at least upon one occasion, to make 1 proposed to maintain Slavery in Kansas up to 1 myself understood. There ran be no ditlerence ‘ the year 1858, and provided that 4§iildren born ’ [ of opibion as to w hat the Kansas Nebraska bill i °f S'a\e parents in the Terril«ry.A,Tmd sold in j means. Its terms are explicit. It confers up. I the meant.mo to a slave Statffofihould be Jon the people of Ihc Territory all ihe law mn- I klu'cs for life, and holding aft that the’ j king power which Congress possesses under increase of Shivery can only bo bought about the Constitution. If the authority delegated hy the increase of the number «f beings mi Jbe sufficient, the people have a law making bondage-we did maintain Dunn’s j j power equal to any question. This is a point. 1 bill was virtually to increase Slavery, however, ns to the meaning of tlie Constitution j Mit. TnoMUi’i.r.. Will tho Cijenalor fiom • |of the United Slates. My cnnstniction of that , Pennsylvania allow me to interrupt him for a , j instrument oertnlnly is of very lit le import- | moment ? j anco. but still lam willing to express it. I Mu Bioi.rti. No. sir. T bcc,thc Senator' am of tlie opinion that tlie people through (heir 'from Illinois lo .excuse me, if hft pleases. I ; local legislature have that power. I arrive at Bud that if f y ield to further interruptions my Mills conclusion because I can see but two ; speech will be much longer than f IntomUd i sources of law making power for a Tcrriton ( Mu. Tummdcli,. I wished correct the' ihc one, Congress : and ihc other, the people. J Senator in regard to that blit. ' H ' J I bold that, whin C’ougres* has conferred upon | Mu. Buh-kr. —lt was the pr|ojcc of l he| the people of a Tirniory all Hit law-roiiking , Fremont par y in the canvass the! po.wer which it possessed under the C’onsliiu- j Dem;;c p ncy with seeking to morafk.' slavery, i lion, the power is eomple'e in the people, equal 1 and wo availed ourselves of theWifcis I have j to the question of domestic slavery, or anv oth- 1 staled in rviorl So far from the j cr subject: but ilns is n legal quesrnm, and I increase of slavery by art of Coi|k | for one should bo gratified to see ti. decided. _iofn° by winch such nvdjjk\, 'w - be. Mn. Wadk. Tho reason why I asked the J accomplished, except ihiv)ligbßli«.i < c9«ltmWCo?'. qnostinn. and wished the Senator’s opinion ment of the slave* trade and no one Wofifd on* j upon the subject, was, that towards the close! term n aimb an idea. But tlio Republicans In I of the last session the Senator from Illinois. I the House, bolding that slnvciw • has -no- Jcgnlf 1 {Mr. Trumbull,] in an amendment to n pen- existence in xfiu Territory of. K«n>w»..-.roi« to I I ding bill. proposed to d»-claro what was tlie | recognize and nmininin it till 1858.*and {o.pro*/ I true intent and meaning of those peculiar w onls , vide (bar the Issue of slave parents, if sold 40 a J 'in the Nebraska bill ; namely, that it was m., stare StnD-m the meantime, sbmihl be slave-, 1 tended that the people, through Dnir Teirito- for life virtually nMnnp cd according tn Dnir 1 rial legislature, should have the power lo pro ■ own doctrine* to increase the number of slaves 1 lubit Slavery in the Territories. Upon I hat 'by net of Umgress. | ! proposition if 1 am not mistaken, ihc Senator | t Many persons ore in the habit of enufoun- 1 ! voted in the negative. ding (be mesense ofslnveri with Us terrmonnl | j Mu nmt.Kli. Mr. President, every mem-! extension nnd Sinn 1 , doubtless voted the He be r of ibis body undersi nnd-* that sbject very ' publican ticket because they Itelieved that the I 'well. Tlie Senator from Illinois upon the ot b- , inhibit i->n of slavery ns to Kansas wiis to re 1 .it side did olfer tbul pioposiliun os nn amend , tard tbe grow> bof the institution. Where Ia 1 , ment lo vrbnt is known as the Tmnlii lull citizen of Knn-as. with my present- impressions ’ I He ofT> red ibis bill, which was not germane. I should vote ngnnisi the eslablishmeill of sla ’ and I should not have voted for it bowirer 1 lery : but m doing bis 1 would feel that I | bad believed in Ms trulh It was mu of plnce was noi doing anything lo prevent (he increase when offered lo a bill where the question dal of ihe immU rot slaves or to improve their } not properly arise. But not only Dial, sir a cnnli mu To scatter the slaves over n greater I vote in the Semite of the United S nies to tic ana will do il.cm good rather than harm, and cidc a judicial question, was agreed on all to naie.ct the ms itutmn to its present limits j hands to lie minicessnry. if not improper I will not effect Die increase of,Lite number of declared my views u|mn Dial occasion and I slaves for a cenlurv for it will, in mv jlldg votes! against the amendment. Why. Mr ment, reqmie all of Dial period lo fill up Die President. wbo in Die North lias ever prelen unoccupied Territories m Dio slaveholding ded to advocate the esinblisbnu nt of Slavery Suites. In Texas ak.iie D «ro arc ov«.r ninety in Kansas ? No man •no one of all tin orators millions of acres of virgin son untouched by the whom I met in the canvass, whetlier fiom Die inip'cmenis of Die agriculturalist, rich and east South or North, did any such thing. Their of cnlnvaiion favored by a , genial plimale. i unit inn doctrine was. that the people. I hrongb The numlHr of slaves in Dial .Stn «do not equal a proper law-making power, should carry out , one lo even squme mile of Territory, llow, I their own views. | after all, then do Die practical and direct con ' Bui it is obvious that the object of this b, Will the gentleman allow me to ask him one question ? lie is not so explic it us I could wimi. Mu Hmh.kk. The Senator can proceul. Mu. Wapk. The gentleman lias just staled thni he is for leaving the qmsiion of freedom in the Territories to he decided by the people of the Terriionea as they please. In the next breath, he (ills us there is a eonsiiiuiinnal question in he decided by I lie cnurlN I do noCsUhderstaml how lie reconciles these two ideas,': Mh. Rici.ku, 1 did not raise a consliln tioiml question. There is one, am) lei ii lie decided lam claiming that the people have that power. Mu. Wadr. Then whv talk of devolving ii on ihe courts ? Why ih it improper for on in declare that wo mean to cieroiso the power if we ham it ? Mu. Iliof.KH. You ran raise tho question «nd have it decided. As the Senator fiom Ohio claims the entire power to be hi Congress, ho must be perfectly Rulistled that tho entire power has bam delegated to the people. Sir, I cannot speak of the canvass in Indiana or Illinois, for I was not in those States - but of New Jersey and Pennsylvania I can speak, ond in these. States I know that tho issues were met boldly and’ broadly. In the whole range of my observation and reading. I cannot call*lo mind an Instance where a public anna kcr or a Democratic newspaper demurrred to the Democratic doctrine on the Slavery hues, lion ns enunciated nt Cincinnati, Indeed, it was tho beauty and’ fofoo of this broad don trine that enabled the Democracy to withstand the varied and potent elements of prejudice and passion employed biTtho other side. But. Mr. President, tho lion, Senators from Ohio and Massachusetts are evidently unhappy, because of the use of the term “free Kansas" in connection with a Democratic meeting. I hope it has not taken these Senators till now to discover that the Democracy are tho ndvo cates of real freedom in Kansas—that kind of freedom which our fathers achieved in tho con (iict with the forces of George 111- Wear© for leaving the people of Kansas -free in make their own institutions, and are, therefore, for. free Kansas. Tho Republican parly, op Uio ' 1 • ! i’ I «>i I.ink up.in Ins question as n qnes ti-.n of S’lii.K The Stales #s noliticnl corpo rniinns have no direct interest in 1 lie Terrilo m-H Ido in>' iec. .gntze of Virginia. op ihe Hmii! of T* xuh ns a Sialo, as having ,a pur’ido nf mliri'i m ilium • nor ihu Sl«to of Mumr imr the Smu* of MimxanlniKcUH. nor Ni\v VorK imr nnv mill- free Smte li in a I ijm-sii-in wi'li tin- fM-ojilr nf ihu United Siali-H ” I Nmv. Mr IVrM'innt. if ihu sni(u*i in thuir I rnr|inntti‘onrucii) have no intcroM m llicqncn | linn of hl«u‘<>- m the TuMloriuH, llivn why ' docji llic Sunninr oiH Mimic who net with him. instat that ihi* StnM'K *lmll Cunlml the'qucßtlon I their success ([inn tlio mere Inhibition o( slavery ilmniuh ihe r**nnn-niniiu-hof ihrir sovereignty in tho Territories. They confidently antlcipa* on .hit floor I I W.T Him ihc State a. Mich tl >" r "l ll,ul ~r "‘“J r "8 l(iv 1 ° ,lan ; Uw. besldoa hnvc no ilim'l coiii'.-mi, and IhaMlu- people of tho Nocllon of oil lorrlloriM which ..kod for Ihc Uiiii.nl Sin... who CO 10 tho Territories oro I into tH« Union an S ntoa with coitall. im, un «i i i H rpft , nn f)inir , (ntions recognising slavery. But statesmen of mewt uiicresied; ami f,rl *f !k p ,k" I 1 the Republican parly must necessarily shano Hhnnli! be allowed lo uinmic they , tMr Hont i rm .„i B by (ho letter, if not by (he will Imvo tlir niKMiniioo or not. The people a . } | r Q f j}, e Constitution. Tot, sir, a very who cinignre 10 ibi* 1 emlonea arc not only proportion of the votes cast for tbclr can the ni’iKt interested. but th**y are moat coinpc- ' ( j| ( j rtto f or ihu Presidency were mndo up of two tent, nml bnu* ilie bunt right to decide. The e in Mo B ( rle i first, those who are looking to the people of bin Stale and mine exorcised that abolition of slavery everywhere, and who hope right..and why deny it tn tlm people ol those to consummate (bln work through the Uopubll- Sintca wlm'tnnv go to the Territories? The cnnparfyi and this Is (bo class to, whom tho Democrnev contend f'»r, but the Republicans Senator from Now York rMr. Seward) might deny. ibis right. Thev nay’ that, Congress say, “ Slavery can and will bp abolished, and shall prejudge and dt-cnle the question] that you nnd I will do It i” and to ryhioh tho Senator those who are not in the Territories.vnusr bo from Ohio [Mr. TTudo] would glvo awmranco of permitted lo control the decision. The power the prompt repeal of tho “Infamous fugitive to shape iliin domra io institution In Kansas. •}*** ,aw *” Tho oth «»* class Is composed of for Instance shall be found every when) else l»‘o«e who are actuated by motlyoaof sympathy oxo.pt in ihc Territory ! Tin-Democracy ray fo , r ""> *•"> » f ‘'‘® wnltnppy A,(Vican-of Iho.o that those Whp «o m Kansas ahail make its «'''n'i ry 1 ls ," *T'T g instiinliotm : the ' ln f p "J!; ( to prop lo who tl.i i I KOJO ''“ [O" 11 ' Tim la;,dm. of that parly have thom.olvua boon th ongh ih‘'ir UepnHiiiiallvosln 0< tigress shall vigilant and persevering to create those very decide wheiher slavery shall fust thereof not. I and if they will havo the candor that those who have no mlcrcst there, who oven now to turn around, and proclaim unmU know nothing of the soil and olimnte. shall be that thev do not bold the views enter, the unipirp. tallied v hy tlioso classes of. people, nor seek to And here Is the vital issue hQtwcoq tho par* j remedy (bfTovlJs they complain of, my word for . ties; this was the issue put and decided in the their ranks will very soon bo materially fhin • tost contest for President. ThcSmalor has a ned, and those of the nltra-Aholilionista cnlarg . right to claim much consideration for his su- e( * * n n like ratio. This done, and they will not , perior intelligence, but I can scarcely believe CJ I!T y e . ORon States at the next election. They that He is willing to claim for himself end his " ot ,ha " hava n.l»Bm.Ud hv some. | (he hist winter.) posse-sod an area of l.nt one ! how are we lo get clear of it , It makes the hundred and sixty-four thousand square miles. very foundation of nor whole Repul.lman sys : and those south of the same line an orna ol six tom :it m derlies tl c institution* of t ach and hundred and forty-seven thousand square miles, all nf the Siaies • it is t.>e very eiwenco of true | Now. the slavehohting States possess an area ol Republicanism : it is neither more nor less than «>ght hundred and eighty-two thousand square self government. j miles, and the free States, with the Territories | But, Mr. Presidi n’. T deny that it is a poli- i ' n, *vitahlj to become treoSlafes.au erea of fiver cv or rule to favor the extension of slavery ! on |-‘ million seven hundred thousand sqmn • Those who make the allegation know hotter. ' ™ I T Ss » ro, y‘he Senator and hia pnrtv cannot The vast vntigraiini, to the Tetrilonea from t , ” al “"" c " 1 “> sa cl, WeMloi, as title. And yet the Northern Stales, a,.Blamed by a constant r',X 'X.WtXrTi''"," TV o""'!?'’' I',’* , • r .I iruitlul Biinjccts of discussion lor the uemibh accession from all porta of the world cannot c .u. party dimag the cm. prlgn. ' favor the prop,.gal,on of slavery Whv, the The fugitive slave law a another. The law i senator from Maine has told ns whai we know was talked of. even hv men ol position In socle jto be true, that the owners of slaves in the . ly. an though It had no constitutional nnthorify United Slates do not number half a million : —as though It were the mere net of Congress I whilst th«*e who have no slaves count not les-» ami that by its agency alone slaves were re limn twentv five} millions How. then. I claimed. They know better, Mr President. - ] would ask. the five hundred thousand lo n- , They knew thirt the law on tins subject Is noth ■ vnl ihe Iwenly-llvt uulliniis in ihcoccupution ol . ing—the ('(institution everything. The law the Territory to *.nv nothing of emigrants K‘ VI ' S no man the right lo his fugitive slave—, from other cf uo vi> s who come licie almost in- Constitution lias done this, and the Sn. I variably with mrnng prejudices against negro /1,1,rf °f the United States has so deeid slavery ? The idea i.s pi-epostrmns The ac-I fld 1 “" d ,. ,hw I ,rtW is , hnt nf J ritaal i.iu has Itrvit ma« to subserve partisan ''t"' ? ''"fT fends, and nut I,.cause the vtttrusiou of slavery '“JiX, “„ m '‘7 If “‘"'"t r..,n-r1«,.1.0n ! 1 f , f,i - i .i • > r i anrt who reject anr portion of that insim , was feared, fur one. Ithmk this mode of ml- ment repudiate all its blessings. The Senator J.lstu.vnt a safe. wise, and Just one It re- from Ohio has nut hesitated lo dn tlda. and vet spiels I tie constitutional rights of the icople he claims, I believe, to ban f, lend ~f It, r Union of the S mlb, whilst it imposes no rest nm ion* Senators representing Stateh the Uegisladires of upon the judgment and tedings of those of which have taken distinct gn un i against the ex thc North. It will at no veiy distant day re eention of this isiw, say they are for the Union • Uuve foom the dangiVmus contro and the constlnuional rights of all tho States, ytwy. K > .'r *v Now, jyofl.npt pda conatitutlonal provision one I shnli not charge that the Republican spen* Uio compacts of the U;don7 \yna it apt.one Item and wriiers did, not come up to ihcir the cnmpninifses of the Constitution ? 'Cpr / fot-m. I: allege vnnd |)ie /acts proves B u - aa j iond no man has a : fulp claim to f Ihe nllfgmlon. ,A» lo hu.siilify to slavery, ,r K‘''dfihJp, for cfthor whowlU.not savfhnt if Is I Ihhy ndt tmlycnnic'bp to’but went Tar hevoml *° l bo / tt hifO,dy-exeoiitcd,, Tbo denunoiaiion of it. The pres*.* i lie- pulpit, and ihe W'r-im thls< ono of the pbfenf means of i|.o in the interests ol Ibis parlv in the North, vm ' :am l’ ,,l K"' ""e'l Mr, Frrsaontb. vnf... rr„w U-l al.tl.d ,In,,,,,,'sunns aqaius, tb,. |„ s ,| I “ “ s ";-™ " na ' ["i 01 '' 0 a "' l »>»'-■ free In | l.iui.n »limner l,„.,„l Its pr,j,„1„.,„l elbcs , ’,|J" 3 1,1 11 1 l “ ,v 0 lo °" R ' rs to de ' T'T'' r""' r ', 1 ' •"> nut ai.b la bcisunderstand. I „n, I nggnss.ims „»„s„rpnn..„s and „„t „itl, ur ns the •ivorsle ol «l„- „ppr™s,n„s and , lie I,„r,Maps endared t.y ,l,e very the defender ol the S„„tl, | I p„„r Aft in,i,■ were ll„ ,r nmslnni ami fsvnnie l l„ Mml.eate Itulury, ,„,d p.ir„e„l',rlv t|„. I.t.te.rv 1 1 bemeK. And ft is idle fm Semi mis to pietend |of the late presidential conh wluclt tins been ■ llmi lhe aigmmrns of tin- Hi publicans wen l «o unfairly referred to. I -nl -b-.ifi> nor 1 (-Miillm-d 1,, ihr mere question of the extension have 1 ever songhl, the extenalo* of slavery; •if Mlnvtry into the Terntorie* or that the and heartily do I concur with the Senator fn-m rigli'H of ihe institution where it now exist* South Carolina. ( Mr. Butler,! when he said the were spoken nf in terms of even ihe coldest tol ottn-r day, “I do not mint the extension of ala. oration. K was diKcussisl m usChriHimn as 1 [reel ; and almost universally in such manner , M, rr, , ' T h RR * 1 | ,O K ,rt understood correct a* lo excite the billot cut umudtci* against it ly ' 1 ho,r ‘ ,m aske.l mo how ihe n„d the Slates where it existed J,, st «„ c |, ™ r ‘‘ " l,ch 1 "•“» lo •'"nslriicd I I sentiments were uttered ss were hest enl-.tla ~ n H ,l', n “J I 1 lw " ,lw ".v i m''lin ,.d t„ nliennlc t he fe.ltugs of the people „f one ■ c ion of the Ln,on from I ose of another indlllerottcy. I said, lei the Institution go where I, does not biernte llumi. Hen. to complain It would, I would not attempt here either tol Umi the I)»mocrafic parly did not meet the restrain or extend It. Issues They made fur more by fanning lho Mr. Bioler. I think that is the substance of] unholy flames of passion and prejudice, and hy the quotation I was about to road. The Sena, invectives on transiently occurring events in (of from South Carolina remarked : Knn-.as. and personal difiiculriea between mem- “1 do not.wunl the extension of »hvery; I birs of Congress, winch had necessary conncc have never contended for it. If I had (tie rigid tion with i lie real issues, than we could possi- ' 0,0 lo e * (t - ,fl d ft by act of Congress. I would hlv have gamed by evasion, had we so desjr- ""dcrlako to do so; 1 wouM leave that to id- We met .he issues, ana we met them f Jj,?, 0 o/ Bmae who aoltlo the new common fairly ami lo aiiest die truth of this and that 'Sit, l . B i ~ , , ... whial. I havo asscrU'd against the Opposition, „ ,'“ V ° 7" ,' 1 ™ '"l" 11 "' 0 ■ I. , , , M Democratic parlv con ended or. Tie Senator I could pro,luv S|„ss=l,™ and newspaper wn- n ,„ MI Mr Kl|l>k ,„ , lln(1(lnil „ nd lings alums l altltonl number: but I nn.g.nc c x,,re B .ed II,„ .amt, .enlimenl, I. than, not an „ ,s itmustes-siiry l„ oDvr them hero. Ihnrlly enaugl, Imre, sir. to .how llmt lho eilen Wtio, I Mould iinli. uvei heard a Republican speaker upon rtie stump ttMnju*ring his denun riuiloiiH against slavery l»> expressing Ids regard tor ibo constitutional rights ol the slareholding States, or (or lliu toolings of thosu who hold slaves I Some may have dono it, hut I hud not tin* pleasure of hearing (hem. It Is true that, alien driven to Ihu null, thoy would admit tho right of the Slates to barn ntich an institution, hut (ho admission nas so mado ns to gonuially leave (he impression that In snmo way or other, (h£insHt(iiion "ns to bo everywhere abolished through Um agency of thu Republican party. — - lU'DUbnv... . Senators may uuallfy uml explain, and lay claim to entire loyalty to the Constitution ami tho Uni.m—llujy may discard Garrison, Phillips, Spooner. and nil of that school of disunionlsts, as much as they please—hut no man in IJjo North could fail to discover (hat a considerable portion of (hu Opposition wore Iml to believe that something more was to bo accomplished by AT $2,00 PBK ANNUM. slon of slavery by the agency ami power of the Government, id untrue 7 I iad cost otir fathers nothing, mid Its absolution would remedy a single one of the evils complained ofj and I certainly liavo no respect for the suggestion of (Thvernor Adams, of Solid) Carolina, that the slave Irado shnll In* recommenced. I condemn, discard, and ropu dial© fho fatal suggestion j and I am gratified to believe (hat southern statesmen and the southern people will do the sumo thing. I have, however, an admiration for that class o( smith, orn statesmen who declare distinctly and em phatically that they can only remain In the Un ion as equals. Thoro Is another class of political phlloso. phors, widely separated from those of whom I havo Just been speaking, for whoso opinions I have. If possible, still less respect. I refer fo Garrison, Wondoll Phillips, Theodore Parker. Henry 0. Wright. Gorrlt Smith. Spooner, and similar fanatics, who, in attempting illegally to abolish slavery in the Ststeswhero It now exist*, would dissolve the Union and aggravate the evils (hoy lament. Although in the main these men acted with (ho Republican party In the late canvass, yet I am not unehnritahto enough to hold iho moss of that party accountable fbr the monstrous sentiments of (hose traitors to our beloved institutions. And with the madcaps nf iho South J wnn'd throw overboard those fsna. tics of thn Knit, and take core of the country without the aid. of either. Mr. President, I have boon forced to speak of (ho bad fooling entertained by a class of poo. plo In the North towards thn people'of the South, and of another class In the South to wards tlio people of (tie Norths and the task has been by no moans n pleasant one. T hdve no sympathy with (hat crimination and roorlmina* ,t|on which lif, on calculated to estrange those who, should ho friends and .brethren. The pen pie whom | represent In'part upon tills floor; silion who would pres# their opinions tcTtft dissolution of the Union? but, so far M ?fOA> svlvdnlo is concerned, Isay, with pleasure, o distributed ulikp to every part, and disease, will hopelessly assail wli.it must be so paro and healthful. Neither fanaticism nor Hilibosterism can make any impression upon that good old f Commonwealth. The storm of faction may* rage, but she will come out of U more erect in her noble patriotism than ever. The more ter-, tlblo the trial the closer will her people cling to the Constitution, the ark of our common safety. 1 Central in her geographical position, and still more so 1 hope in the confidence and affection of her sister States, and equally so ns to the sources of that spirit of discontent which at limes would seem fo menace the existence of the Government, she mnj best perform tlio high office of Ket stone of the Federal arch. I be lieve she will perform it should the crisis come, and flint, though the controversy between (be North and South, so much lamented by all pa triots, nmy go on foi centuries, she will rualo tiin her integrity to the Union, and be found landing, like some impassable isthmus between two heaving seas, defiantly resisting the biller waves of discontent, whether they dash against her northern or her southern side. Among the innumerable anecdotes related of the niln of persons at play, there is one worth relating, which refers to n Mr. Porter, a gentle, man, who, in the reign of Queen Anno, posses sed ono of the best estates in Northumberland, the whole ot which lie lust at hazard, in twelve months- According lu (be story told of this madman—lor wo will cad him nothing else— when he bad jtJfit completed the loss of his last acre, at a gambling bouse in London, and was proceeding down the stairs to throw himself in to u carriage to convey him humo to his house In town, he n solved upon having one more throw to try to retrieve Ids losses, and immediately returned to the room where the play was going on. Nerved tor the worst that might happen, he insisted timt the person lie bad been playing; with should give him one chance of recovery* or light with him. His proposition was this;’ that his carriage and horses, the trinkets anti loose money in ids pockets, hls town house, plate, and furniture—in short, all he hod lell-in the world, should bo valued in k lump at a cer tain sunii and bo thrown at a single east. No-' persuasions could prevail on him to depart from his purpose., Jlu threw, and lost; then.con-, ducting (ho winner fo' the door, he told “fhq I coachman there was hls mssturpaod’ ' forth into the dark and diaimU streets* without * house or homo, or any ono crcdifal»l«wnoans.'ol; support. Thus boggard. h« retired to an.ob scure lodging in a cheap part of the town, tujK- ' slsting partly on chairlty, sometimes acting as" the murker ai a billiard table, and occasionally as a helper in a livery stable. In this misera ble condition, with nakedness and famine star ing Idm in the face, exposed to the taunts and insults ol those whom he had once supported, he "as recognised by an old friend, who gave him ten guineas to putebase necessaries. Qo expended five in pi ocuring decent apparel; with •he remaining tiv,- he repaired to a common g uning bouse, and increased them to fifty! lie t «□ adjourned to one ot the higher order Of bouses, sat down with dormer associates, and won twenty thousand pounds. Reluming the next night, be lost it all was once more pennl. less, and alter .subsisting many yours in abject penury, died a rapped beggar in Saint Giles's. Now and Torn. —The sumptuous salaries mid to ministers of the gospel now contrast trangely wuh those of the olden times. Mr. Goodrich. Peter Parley.' in his Recollections of a Lifetime, jusi published si a leg that his fath r. a Connecticut clergyman of the Congrega tional persuasion, brought up and educated a fnmilv of 8 children on a salary of $4OO a year, and left at his death, 'an estate of 54.000 ' He did not only do this, bin his house was a kind of elemoNyunry uvim for travelling clergy men. BtT” A Juror’s name was railed by the clerk. The man advanced to the Judges desk, aud ••aid ; •Judge. T should hke to he excused.' It is impossible,'said the Judge, decided •Rut. Judge, Ifyou knew my reasons.' •Well, sir. irhai are they?’ 'Why, the fact is,’ and the man paused. •Well, sir, proceed 'continued the Judge. ‘Well. Judge, if I must say it. I have got the The Judge, who was a very sol»cr man, B«l -mnly and impressively exclaimed-^ •Clerk. scratch that man out 1’ \rr The strongest symptom of wisdom In ian, is hi* being seuaiMc of his own lollira. i Ty~ Fueling guides ns when the sky is clear. i 1 icason holds th l rudder when the sky is iTT* It is with ceruiu good qualities as with »• senses—those who areeniinly deprived of urn can neither appreciate nor comprehend (O 51 “Little boys should be seen and not heard,” as the boy-said when ho could not re _ch« bin lesson. OtT" Ncrcr giro your old and tried friends online to think you have slighted them. An < old friend is north tjro new ones. 0“ Would you nay that a lady Is •• dressed loud," who ia covert*! all over with bugles? - A Sea Gull—An unsuspcdtingjolly salor i the hands of sharpers. ‘ ' 1 ’ EC?“ Sambo, do you sposc d?ro angeUr.of , color ? Yes, you great fool, wher’fl tfc Prince Of Darknc&a. . , , (O* Bad words. like bogus shillings arc of ten brought home to the person; they tuned- , , , n ; ~l u fTT'Soliiu-i ww. a — To'shdi ep‘& ! by ■« ip ellm- amt give ~.u. .ret access .elh©DiO• , Lsbhjs cask. " lv» A Cnrabltt,