THE HUNTINGDOi GLOBE, A DEMOCRATIC FAMILY JOURNAL, DEVOTED TO LOCAL AND GENERAL NEWS, H. THE GLOBE. 1111VNLITADDE, P 2„ Wednesday, March 21,1860 LANKS ! BLANES ! BLANKS ! USiSTABLE'S SALES, ATTACEMENTS, SUMMONS, DEEDS. SUBP(ENAS, MORTGAGES, SCHOOL ORDERS. JUDGMENT NOTES, LEASES FOR HOUSES, NATURALIZATION B'KS, COMMON BONDS, JUDGMENT BONDS, WARRANTS, FEE BILLS ; NOTES, with a waiver of the $3OO Law. JUDGMENT NOTES. with a waiver of the $3OO Law. ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT, with Teachers. MARRIAGE CERTIFICATES; for Justices of the Peace and Ministers of the Gospel. COMPLAINT, WARRANT. and COMMITMENT, in case of Assault and Battery, and Affray. SCIERE FACIAS. to recover amount of Judgment. COLLECTORS' RECEIPTS, for State, County, School, Borough and Township Taxes. Printed on superior paper, and for sale at the Office of the HUNTINGDON Ghoure.. BLANKS, of every description. printed to order, neatly, at short notice, and on good Paper. FOR PRESIDENT, SnE-iN 10:GLAS, [Subject to the decision of the Charleston Convcntion.] DEDIOCEATIC STATE NOMINATION. FOR GOVERNOR, HEY D OF WESTMORELAND READ THE .NE Tr AD ERI7ST_JZE TS.` R Presidential Calculations---The Duty of ; the Charleston Convention. Upon the Democratic Na'ional Convention, which is to assemble at Charleston on the 23d of April, a great responsibility will rest. Upon the duty of that Convention the Chica go Times has some very sensible and well timed remarks which we adopt and submit to our readers. They should be placed in the hands of every delegate to Charleston and carefully read and considered. The Times says :—The Republican party, is indulging in large expectations of success in the ap proaching Presidential election. These ex pectations are, however, entertained by them, with one proviso, namely, that Stephen A. Douglas, is not the candidate of the Demo cratic party. If he is not, the leaders of the Opposition are confident of the election of their candidate. What are the reasons for 1 , the faith that is in them? The whole num ber of electoral votes will be three hundred and three—necessary to a choice, one hun dred and fifty-two. It is admitted that the Democracy will carry the Southern States, representing one hundred and twenty votes ; to this we may safely add Oregon and Cali fornia, being seven votes, and giving the De mocracy one hundred and twenty-seven votes to start with, and requiring twenty-five votes to carry the election. Where are these twen ty-five votes to come from ? New York (thir ty-five) alone is enough ; so is Pennsylvania, (twenty-seven votes) Indiana, (thirteen votes) and Illinois, (eleven votes,) with either New Jersey, Connecticut, New Hampshire, lowa, Wisconsin or Minnesota, will give us the re quisite number. Can we obtain the votes of either, and how many of these States, and how ? New York, Pennsylvania, New Jer sey, Connecticut, New Hampshire, lowa, Wis consin and Minnesota, are in the hands of the enemy, and although we might get the vote of Indiana and Illinois, we still would fail of an election. Now, is there a man in the Democratic party so demented as to suppose that, with a slavery protection platform, or a slavery protection candidate, any one of the States we have indicated above, can be re deemed from Republican thraldom ? Or can any man suppose this can be done in the present excited state of public feeling by nominating some half-way, namby-pamby candidate, whose chief recommendation is the obscurity in which his life has hitherto pas sed away? With Seward as the Republican nominee, (and the signs of the, times indica ting his selection as the Republican standard bearer are to significant to be disregarded,) would there be any hope of carrying New York fur a Democratic candidate who was either out and out committed to the new tan gled doctrine in regard to slavery, or who, having been non-committed thus far, might foolishly expect to wriggle into the chair of State without a declaration of his views on that point until after the election ? Could Pennsylvania be carried under such circum stances ? Could Minnesota, or lowa, or any one of the State's whose electoral vote is ne cessary to a Democratic victory (and we have assumed that Illinois and Indiana would go for the Democratic nominee) ? had these States been opposition for so long a time that a reaction might be reason ably supposed to have set in, the belief would be more sensible that their redemption could be accomplished, even with a candidate such as we have mentioned, but as the matter stands now, it is utterly impossible. And yet nobody doubts that it is within the power of the Charleston Convention to pre vent the election of a .11epublinan president in 1860 and to preserve the peace and harmony of the Union. That Convention has only to give force and effect to the unmistakable will of the great majority of the party by the nomination of Stephen A. Douglas for the Presidency and the reaffirmance of the Cin cinnati platform, and the success of the De mocracy is certain I The popular preference is concentrated on Judge Douglas, and the masses would ratify his nomination at the polls as certainly as it is made. Indiana, Illinois, lowa, Minnesota, and New Jersey (to say nothing of the great ATTACIET EXECUTIONS, EXECUTIONS, States of New York, Ohio, and Pennsylva nia, and Wisconsin, Connecticut, and New Hampshire, all of which we believe he would carry) would et.. ,t their votes for him as sure ly as the sun rises and sets upon election day ; and their votes, with the admitted Dem ocratic strength of which we have spoken, would elect him triumphantly. We are sincere in our belief that if Judge Douglas is nominated at Charleston, he will be elected by the largest majority that has been given in the last twenty years—except, possibly, in 1852. If the elevation of a_ sectional party to power in the federal government is fraught with hazzard to the Union, is it not the first* duty of the Democratic party to take such action in the premises as will prevent the pos sibility of an occurrence so calamitous ? That possibility can be certainly prevented by the nomination of Mr. Douglas. Perhaps it may be done with some other man, but it is certain with him, and can we at this junc ture afford to run any unnecessary risks ? There can be but one answer to this question. Let the name of Stephen A. Douglas be in scribed on the National Democratic banner, and the contest of 1860 is from that moment won From that moment all fears of the tri umph of Republicanism are at an end ! and henceforth the glorious flag of this mighty nation will float over a united and happy country, reposing on the protecting power and justice of its government and sustained by the strong bands and gallant hearts of a vast majority of the American people. The Presidency That staunch old Democratic paper, the Doylestown Democrat, edited by Col. W. W. IT. Davis, comes to us this week with the name of Stephen A. Douglas flying at its mast-head. The Democrat says:— We place at the head of our columns, this week, the name of Stephen A. Douglas, of Illinois, as our choice for the Presidency.— The advocacy of the claims of this distin guished gentleman for the first place in the gift of the American people is no new thing with us, as every one knows who reads the Democrat. During the last two years our columns have contained editorials, from time time, in his favor. and down to this present writing, nothing has transpired to cause us to change-our mind. Our reasons for favoring the nomination of Mr. Douglas fur President, are few, and can be briefly given. In the first place he is the strongest man, by all odds, in the Democratic party, and, under the present view of the case, we do not believe any other Democrat can be elected. Ile holds a place in the af fections of the masses that is occupied by no other Presidential aspirant, and his name alone is a tower of strength to us. As a mat ter of policy, only, he should be the nominee. But our adherence to, and preference for, Judge Douglas, are based upon something above the mere matter of expediency. We like him, nay, we admire him, for his devo tion to principle. Through all the vicissi tudes of party politics for the last three years, and for that matter during his whole life, he has never deviated from the honored princi ples of our party ; but has advocated them with a manliness and boldness that have won him the admiration of his bitterest revilers. He has always stood fair and square upon the platform, and neither the blandishments of power nor the threats of his fees, hove caused him to turn aside . from the path of duty and right. He has ever held our ban ner aloft, in the thickest of the ii ; . 4 lit, and in stead of waiting for the assault of the enemy, he has invariably met them upon their own battlements, and there contended for victory. He has never been known to forsake a prin ciple, or desert a friend ; and the cherished creed of our party is the political lamp which lights his pathway. When we say that Judge Douglas is the strongest candidate, by far, presented for the Presidency, we make no idle assertion.— All the western and north-western States have instructed their delegates to vote for him at the Charleston Convention, and there is scarce a doubt but that he will also receive the vote of every New England State, same of them being instructed for him, and perhaps New York, upon the first ballot. His friends have carried the city of Baltimore, and his pros pects are the best for a united delegation from Maryland. The idea, which his enemies have put forth, that he has no strength in the South, is being contradicted daily by politi cal events in that section of the Union. Ev ery mail brings us new indication of his in creasing popularity in the slave States, and the people there are rapidly becoming con vinced that he is the only man who can lead the Democracy to victory against the legions of the Republican army. Within the last few days, four leading journals in the South, viz ; the Cobini,bus (Ga.) Corner-Stone, Sel ma (Ala.) Sentinel, Lynchburg (Va.) Repub lican, and Athens (Ala.) Herald, have come to his defence, and advocate his claims. His friends in that section of the Union are rap idly growing in strength and numbers, and as the people themselves see the necessity of his nomination, they are overruling the poli ticians and enlisting under his banner. In this State, the feeling in favor of Doug las is increasing much more rapidly than we expected. We saw enough at Reading to sat isfy us that the masses are with him, and the politicians, in view of his increasing popu larity, are becoming more and more kindly disposed toward him. We know of no, other Democrat, save, probably, Andrew Johnson, of Tennessee, who can carry enough of the free States to ensure the victory; and in Pennsylvania, with Henry D. Foster as his co-standard bearer, he would sweep the State from one end to the other. With Douglas, victory awaits us, but with any other man, we fear a defeat. The Republicans are alarmed at his strength, and in advance of the contest are using their utmost endeavors to break him down. Being well convinced that his nomination seals the fate of their party and candidate, they resort to the un gracious task of prejudicing him before the country—thus hoping to prevent his nomina tion. Their warfare, however, has the con trary effect, and even those who have not hitherto been his friends, are being convinced that he must be a reliable Democrat, else they would not make war upon him. Doug las is the " Coming Man," and the country needs his services. E o==. The hog cholera is r1 . 20'; hatchie Co Missis