sive and tyranioal Government. [Applause.] But perlups this Government, however wisely planned, h< wever beneficial even in its cpem'mn, tn-iy have been rendered distateful, or any have become oppressive in one part of the country an 1 to one portion of the people, in consequence of -,be co-;trc! of affairs baviDg been monopolized or unequally shared by an< ether portion. Iu a Confederacy the people of gee section sra n't well pleased to be even mildily governed by an exclusive domination of the other. In p( int of fact this is the aU lcgati'T. the pr< si-tent allegation of the South, that from the foundation of the Government it has been wielded by the people of the North for their speed, ofieu exclusive, benefit, and to the injury and oppression of the South. Ret u" see. Out of seventy-two years since the organizitinn of the Government, the Executive chair has for sixtyrfoor year* hjgen filled nearly ail the time by Southern Presidents, and when that was not the case, by Presidents possess ing the confidence of the South. For a siili longer period the controlling influences of the Legislative and Judicial departments of the Government have centred in the seme quarter. Of a'l the offiees in the gift of the central power in every department, far rnorp than her proportionate share has always hern enjoyed by the South. She is at this nomco'. revolt ng agaio.'t a Govtriiirent not tn'y ai mi'ted to be tie mildest and most brneficient ever organ zed this side Utopia, but one of which she has her-' self front the first almost raunopnliza d the ad ministration. [Applanse.] ABSAdiXCI'SFS FOR THE REBELLION—THE FISHERY BOUNTIES. Mr. Ev> rett showed how ridioulous was the assertion that Si utu Carolina, or any of tbo S:ate. below the Bordc-r States, bad suffered seriously trom the non-fulfilment of the Fu gitive SHve lw. and pertinently asked whether if slaves did ccspe across the Bonier States, the lat'er should not be held equally responsi ble with the States that ultimately received them or passed into Canada? On the point of the alleged grievance of the fishing bounties, he said: All administrations have concurred in the measure? Presidents of all parties—thongb there has net been much variety of party iu that office —havo approved the appropriations. If the North bad a local interest io these boun ties, the Houtb got the principle food of her laboring population so much the cheaper; and she had her cummin shore in the protection whioh the navy afforded her coasts, and in the glory which it 6hed ot the flag of the country. But since, UDformpntely, the deep eea fisheries do cot exist in the Gulf of Mexi co, nor, as in the 'iage of Pyrrba," ou the top of the Blue Ridge, it has b<-en discovered of late yaar* that these bounties are a vinlatiou of the Constitution; a largess bestowed by the common treasury on one section of the country, and not shared by the other, one of the hun dred ways, in a word, io which the rapacious North is fattening upon the oppressed and pil laged South. [Laughter.] You will natural ly wish to know the amount of this tyrannical and oppressive bounty. It is s'ated by n S nater from Alabama (Mr. Olay) who has warred against it with perseverance and zeal, j aod succeeded, in the )st Congress, in carry j ing a bill through the Senate fur its repeal, to j bV£ amounted, on the average, to an annual ! sum of 5>2 r 0,000! Such is the portentous grievance which iu Georgia stands at the head of the acts of oppression, fo. which, although , repealed in one branch of Congress, the IJn- ! ion is to bo broken up and the country to be desolate by war. Switierlaud revolted be- j cause n Austrian tyrant invaded the sanctity of her firesides, and compelled her fathers to shoot apple* from the heads of her 30ns; the Low Coiatries revolted against the fires of the Inquisition; our fathers revolted because they were tax'-d by a Parlimant iu which they ware not represented; the Gottoa Stite6 revolt be oaase a paltry subvention is paid to the hardy fisherman who form (he n-rveand muscle ef the American Navy. [Laughter.] But it is not, we shall he told, the amount of the bounty, but the principle, ar our fath ers revolted against a ihr-e penny tax on tea. But that was beoaase it was laid by a P.trlia meat in which ;ha oolooies were not represented, and which yet claimed the right to bind them iu all oases. The fishing bounty is bestowed by a Government which has been from the first controlled by the B>u?h. Then how unreason able to expect or to wish, that, in a country so vast as oors, n pablio expenditure shou'd be made for the immediate benefit for one part or one interest that cmnot be identically repeated in every other. A literal polioy, or ra'hor the necessity of the case, demands, that what the public good, upon the whole, requires, shoal i, under constitution il limitations, be dono where it is required, off setting the looil benefit which may aairno from the expenditure made in one place, and for one place, and for one object, wiih the local benefit from the same source, in some other place for some other ob ject. More money was expended by the United States in rem mug the lu Baas from Georgia: eight or t#u fimes as mu 'h was expended for she sarno object m Florida, as has been paid for fishing bounties iu seventy years For the iast year to pay for the expense of the post office in the Seceding States, ami enable uur fellow-citizans there t> enjoy tho comforts of a newspaper and letter mail to the same extent ss they are enjoyed in the other State*, three and a half million of dollars were paid from the oomtnon Treasury. The post offi e bonnfy paid to the Secediog States execeded seventeen fold the annual average amount of the fishiDg bounty paid to tbn North. In four jears that excess would equal the sura total of the amount paid since 1792 in bonotiea to the deep-sea fi-heryf ( As to the alleged grievances of the naviga tion laws and tha protection of American shipbuilding, Mr. Everett showed that they were decidedly for the benefit of the whole eountry alike, and above all the real cause of the growth of onr navy without which the Sonth would be at the meroy of aDy second or third rata power m the world. TH* TARIFF NO CAUSS FOR SECESSION. Mr. Everett declined to enter into a gener al defence of the protective principle, but said . The mnufetQrlng system ag a great North ern interest is the child of the restrictive pol icy of 1807,-181?, and of the war. That pola icy was pursued against the earnest opposition of the North, ina to the temporary prostra tion af tlaeir commerce, navigation and fisher ies Their capital was driven io this way into manufactures, acd on the retnro of peace, the foundations of the protective system were laid in the square yard duty on cotton fabrics, in the suppcrt of which Mr Calhouu advised that the growth of the manufacture would open a new market for the staple of the South, took the lead. As late as IS2I the Legislature of South Carolina nuaoimou.-ly affirmed the con stitutionality of protective duties—and of all the States of the UnioD, Louisiana his derired the greatest t-en-fi from this policy; in Let she owes sugar culture to if, and has for that reason given it their steady support. ID all the tariff battles while i was a member of Congress, few votes were surer for the policy than that of Louisiana. If the duty on an article imported is considered as adde l to its price in our market (which, however, is far from invariably the case) the sugar duty, of late,has amounted to a tax of five millions of dollars annually paid by the consumer for the benefit of the Louisiana pl.ntcr. KING COTTON A CHILD OF THE TAKIFF.' As to its being an unconstitutional policy, it is perfectly well known that the protection of manufacturer was a leading and avowed object for the fo'tuation of the ComMitution. The second law passed by Congress after its formt tion W£B a revenue law. Its preamble is as follow*: "Whereas, i is nece*B ry for the sup port of Government, for the discharge of the debts of the Utvted States, and the encourage ment and protection of manufactures, that duties be laid on poods, wares and merchan dise inipor'ed," That act was reported to the House of Representatives l-y Mr. Madison, who is entitled as much as any one to be call ed the father of the Constitution. While it was pending before the House, aod in the first week of the first eessiou of the first Congress, two memorials were presented, praying for protective duties and it is a matter of some curiosity to inquire from what part cf the country this first call came for fi at polioy now put forward as one of the a :ts of Northern op pression. which justify the South in flying to arms. The first of these petitions was from Baltimore. It implored the new Government to lay o protecting duty on al! articles import ed from abroad, which can he minufaetured at home, the s-cond was from the shipwrights of Charleston, South. Carolina, playing for such a general regulation of trade and the establish meat of such a navigation act as will relieve the particular distresses of the petitioners, in common with those of their fellow shipwrights throughout the Union! [Laughter and ap plause.] But the history of the greit Southern staple is most curiou* and instructive. His Msj-sty, "King Cotton," on his throne does not seem to be aware of the influences which surround ed his cradlp. The culture of cotton, on any considerable seale, is we 11-known to bo of re ccDt date in America. The household manu facture of cotton was coeval with th- settle ment of the country. A century before the piano forte or the harp wi.s seen oo this conti nent the music of the spinning wheel was heard at every fire-side in the town ami coua T ; materials were woul,fl>x and cotton, the last imported from the West Indies. The Colonial system of Great Britiin before the Revolution forbade the establishment of any other thun household manufactures. Soon after the Revolution, cotton-mills were erect ed in Rhode Island and Massachusetts, and the infant manufacture was encouraged by State duties on the imported fabtic. The raw material was still derived exclusively from the West Indies Thus, in the infancy of the cotton manufac tures of the JSTorth, at the moment when they were deprived of the protection extended to them before the Constitution by Stale laws, and white they were struggling against En glish compelition under the rapidly improving machinery oj .drkwright, which it wis highly penal to export to foreign countri-s, a henry burden wis laid upon them by this vtofeciing duty, to enable the planters of South Caroli na and G-orgit to explore the tropics, for a variety of cotton s-eJ adapted to their climate For seven years at least, and probably more, this duty was ia every sense of the word n protecting duty. There was not a pound of colton spun—no, not for eandliwicks to light trie humble industry of the cottages of the wY jrth, which dil not pay this tribute to the Southern planter, [Cheers.] The growth of the e-stive article, as wa have seen, had aot in to 1794 reached a poiut to ho knov, u to Ghief Justioo Jay as one of actual or probable ex port. As late as 1790, the manufacturers of Brandywiac, in Gelaware, petitioned Guogress tor the rep"%i of this duty on impo:tc