Until February 1st, 1899. Terms, 81.00 a Year, in Advance. Bellefonte, Pa., Jan. 6. 1899. P. GRAY MEEK, - - Ebpiror. Quay Tries to Dodge the Law. The public was not unprepared for the charges made in the pending QUAY trial, inculpating the Republican boss and Sena- tor in the criminal use of state funds for which the law provides penitentiary punish- ment. In his arraignment before a court of justice the accused did not show the eagerness of an innocent man to clear his character by a speedy trial, but employed such methods of delay as may retard legal process and prevent a judicial determina- tion of his guilt or innocence. Two judges of the State’s highest tribunal have been so misguided in their action as to aid QUAY’s evasive purpose through the agency of writs that may prevent his case from being brought before a jury. To this interference by the higher court, enforced by a writ of certiorari, the State’s prosecut- ing officer, who is no other than the Re- publican district attorney of Philadelphia, makes answer in terms that have torn to shreds the flimsy plea upon which QUAY seeks to avoid the trial of the criminal charge against him before a court and jury. His petition for the immunity he may gain through a certiorari is answered by the averment of district attorney GRAHAM that he bas evidence supplied by QUAY’ own hand writing, and ready to be produced in the trial pending against him, which will prove that ‘‘the public funds of the State have been used by him for his private and unlawful gain;’ that he was allowed interest on state money deposited in the People’s bank, such interest having been passed to his private account and checked out as his own money, and that the books of the bank show that ‘‘hundreds of dol- lars of the public money deposited in the people’s bank were set apart for M. S. QUAY and were used by him,” the books showing, moreover, ‘‘that hundreds of thous- ands of dollars worth of stocks were bought for the said M.S. QUAY with this money.’’ This is the kind of evidence, ready for presentation to court and jury, which the incriminated Republican hoss endeavors to avoid by seeking refuge behind a friendly certiorari while arranging for his re-election to the United States Senate by servile sup- porters in the State Legislature. It was a well-known fact that the man- agers of the Republican machine were making improper use of the state funds by deposits in favored banks, but without such evidence as district attorney GRAHAM is prepared to produce it could scarcely have been believed that QUAY’S corrupt disposition; to misapply public money, would go so far as to use hundreds of thousands of the State’s funds as if they were his own. Will this arraigned culprit escape the punishment due him for what the law de- clares to be a criminal offense? Will there be such disregard for the law and miscar- riage of justice that he will have the sena- torial toga again fitted upon him instead of standing & trial for an offense which, upon conviction, would require him to be apparelled in the striped habiliments of the penitentiary ? The Passing of Our Historian. In the death of Hon. Joux BLAIR LINN this community has lost a man who has been of inestimable value to it. While his passing will be deplored hy all who realize the importance of the sphere he filled so admirably, yet it was not as if he had carried all the treasures of his rare mind with him into eternity. He has gone, but there remains a monument to him 1n his history of Centre and Clinton counties that will stand as long as time lasts. There are so few men gifted with the patience and persistent care that are the requisites of an historian that the passing of one is a matter of considerable moment. Even now, in the sincerest sorrow over Mr. LINN’s death, this community does not realize the enormity of the loss it has suffered. Time, alone, will impress that upon wus and in future years we will have reason to rejoice that though the dignified, learned gentle- man is no longer here he has left behind him a work such as had never been attempted before and is not likely to be improved upon in the future. GOVERNOR HASTINGS’ MESSAGE, Continued from page 1. tiles. The walls of the House of Repre- sentatives are finished with burlap stained garnet, and fastened to the rough brick walls, also made of tile and brick. Al- though the act of Assembly requires that the building shall be ‘made as vearly fire- proof as possible,’ the roof and most of the interior fittings are as combustible as pos- sible. Furthermore, I am advised by a competent and trustworthy builder, who has personally examined this building, that a fair estimate of the cost of the pres- ent structure would not exceed $225,000 as it now is. and that it will cost to complete the building according to the plans adopted not less.than $2,500,000. This estimate, 1 am informed, is a conservative one and may be relied upon. It is more than probable that it will require twice that sum to complete the building, and it has been so deliberately planned as to require continuing appropriations which, in my judgment, will last during the present gen- eration. In the condition that you find it at this time no one would hazard an opin- ion as to what the style of architecture will be in the end, whether colonial or otherwise. ‘“The only part of the structure to be commended is the foundation, which is ample to support any building, even the Capitol of the United States. This founda- tion has been se planned as to leave an ex- Sena, | tension on the outside surface of about ten { inches for the brick wall. It can hardly be supposed, however, that this elaboration of the foundation was made with the in- tention of inducing this or future Legisla- tures to hide the shameful appearance of the present brick walls by a veneering of marble or granite, because the commission- ers have sworn to the court that the struc- ture would be a complete building and within the limit of the present appropria- tion. The commissioners will not relieve them- selves from just criticism by alleging that the appropriation was too small. It was not for them to say what the appropriation should be. The judgment belonged to the legislative branch of the government. It was the duty of the commission to erect the building in accordance with the pro- visions of the act. One of the provisions limited the expense to $550,000. They distinctly averred before the courts that every provision of the act would be com- plied with and that a complete building for the Legislature, its officers and em- ployes, would be constructed within the limit of the appropriation. The commis- sioners had no right to determine that the appropriation was too small. The Legis- lature had already fixed the amount. They bad no right or power to ignore any pro- vision of the act. That is violation of law. BETTER TO TEAR IT DOWN. They had no right to foist upon the tax- payers of the Commonwealth an incomplete structure, which will require an expendi- ture of at least a million of dollars to make it habitable under their present plan and millions more to add the wings as set out in their drawings. They had not the right to expend the money appropri- ated in such a way as to compel the legislative branch of the government either to tear down and render compara- tively valueless all that has been done or to add millions of dollars to carry out their ultimate design. The commissioners were created by the Legislature to fulfill, in good faith, its solemn enactments, and it is in- sulting to the Commonwealth for the com- missioners to assume legislative power or to so administer their trust as to compel the taxpayers to take the hazard of expend- ing large additional sums for the consum- mation