Bemoraai iadpn. BY P. GRAY MEEK. & Ink Slings. . __Ttis a kind of a cross between the sil- ver and gold bug that is found in the whis- kers of the Populist. | GC — Mrs. MARY ELLEN LEASE has stopped her populistic cryin’ and is talkin’, more at ease, for the Democratic BRYAN. — In nine cases out of ten the fellow who howls loudest for gold hasn’t a dollar in VOL. 41 ~ BELLEFONTE, PA STATE RIGHTS AND FEDERAL UNION. ., JULY 24, 1896. mse his pocket and has been 2 financial dys- | peptic all his life. —The gold people are going to the ex- : - treme of closing manufacturing plants they You ask. How will the free coinage of are interested in all for the sake of saying silver benefit the laboring man and (tthe prospect of free silver did §t.7 Ph od i -ention at St. Louis e answer, in many, very many ways. has Tepp a er Pop- One of these ways for the laborer and alism and”Democracy better than anything one way for the farmer will be that: : It will make a demand for labor. he subject. digs intesn Us toned fhe ii ey § It will make a demand for the products —The Republican campaign will be of the farm upon which labor must exist. formally opened on August 5th. The first De So > : > When in operation the silver mines of gold cure institutes will be located in Min- | 4: conntry, now nearly all idle, employ nesota and Nebraska. more laborers than do the iron mines and —Poorold Lewistown raised $5,000 tose- | mills of Pennsylvania. Toremonetize silver cure the division encampment of the N. G. | is to put these mines at work again. To P. and now that she has it she is mad be- | start them working is to give employment cause the soldiers are not spending enough | to tens of thousands of laborers who have money. now nothing to do and who are crowding __If the wealth of the United States were others out of their places at other work, for equally distributed among all men, Wo- | wages that will hardly keep soul and body men and children of this country there | together. To give employment to these would be just $200 a piece. We're not in | thousands upon thousands of laborers, in our for a “‘divy’’ until we can get 16 to 1. silver mines, is to lessen the number of work- —Judging from the daily sights on Belle- | men now seeking something to do in other fonte streets even the young girls are con- lines of labor, and make the competition vertsto the 16to1 theory. With nearly for places less. With less competition, or every girl in town entertaining two or three fewer laborers, for the work that is to do, others the proportion is about 16 girls to | comes better wages for all workingmen. This is where one of the benefits to labor will come in if the free silver policy is adopted. For the farmer there will be an increased demand for the products of his farm. Tens of thousands of workingmen, now unable to properly clothe and feed themselves and families, will be furnished the means of procuring a comfortable living, and the wages they earn will go into wheat and vegetables and meat for food, and into wool and cotton and linen and leather for cloth- ing, and thus, without reference to any general financial advantages, will the farmer The Democratic party in Pennsylvania | reap a benefit from the adoption of this should look around for a candidate for| policy. - United States Senator who would be in| But you ask what will be done with the harmony with the BRYAN and SEWALL silver, the mining of which, is to furnish administration. Centre county can d0 | the basis of employment for tens of thous- something to this end by electing SCHO- | ands of idle workingmen ? FIELD and FOSTER. Part of it will be manufactured into — Retaliation is one of man’s first means knives and spoons and general tableware of getting even. If England tries to scare and into such other articles as the people us by saying we will make you give us two | need, thus furnishing labor to another of your new silver dollars for every hun- | class of workmen. Some of it will be dred cents worth of stuff you buy from us “minted into money. This money will not can’t we make her pay two for every hun- | be piled in a corner to look at or be kept dred cents worth of beef or bread stuffs she | locked up under the protection and care of wants from us. a policeman. A greater portion of it —They ery about this going to be a would go into the hands of the workmen, campaign of education. Why, Lord bless who mined and smelted it, as wages. From you all, the people of the South and West | them it would go to the farmer, the grocer, have been studying this silver question for the dry-goods dealer, the furniture man five years and as ex-Senator INGALLS says : and others—in every instance creating a «MARK HANNA might as well sell his gold | demand for labor in other vocations. pamphlets for old paper’ and realize on | The surplus or profits would go into de- them while he can. | veloping new properties, building needed Now is the season when the ‘‘poor railroads, erecting houses, factories or mills overworked minister” is being sent of for jo whatever enterprises or improvements its owner would see proper to make, each a rest by his congregation, while his pay | Be 3 goes on. The hot weather makes the devil | and all of them still increasing the demand all the more active and there is no one left | for labor and with the increase in the de- at home to take care of the people but the mand for labor, making a greater demand editor, who never gets tired. Now will for the necessaries that farmers and others you be good. supply, and upon which labor exists. oo * a —The goldites jumped quick to use the | Gelfish and vicious legislation has closed recent closing of the DOBSON woolen me our own mines that furnished one of the in Philadelphia, asan argument agalnst|metals classed as “precious” and which free silver. Mr. Wi. DOBSON, himself, | was recognized and used as money for has nipped this in the bud by saying: “The | ages before the betrayal and crucifixion of Oe a Christ. In consequence we are forced to go Wi e stoppage of our mis. to Europe to borrow the other with which have heen getting steadily worse for sever- | to do business. Thus by borrowing we al years.” create a demand that adds to the value of — In the Republican national platform of their gold mines while we make our sil- 1888 we find this declaration on the money | V¢* mines worthless ; thus we help to keep question : ‘‘The Republican party is in | their workingmen employed while we favor of both gold and silver as money.” starve and pauperize our Own. ‘ Four years later the national assemblage of In the name of all that is christian like, that party declared that : ¢‘the American | humane or sensible, what kind of a system people, from tradition, and interest, favor is it that produces such results, and why bimetallism and the Republican party | should “this existing condition” be con- demands the use of both gold and silver as tinued, as demanded by the advocates of standard money.” How about that ‘‘tra- the gold standard ? : dition and-interest’’ now. How Free Silver Would Benefit Labor= ing Men and Farmers. 1 man. —The free silver sentiment is not going to be cried down by the howl that all the old tea pots, carriage trimmings and shoe buckles of the effete nobility of foreign countries will be sent here to be made into money. . Millionaire oil producers THEODORE and BYRAN BARNSDAL, of Bradford, life long Republicans, have both declared for BrYAN and SEwALL. We would advise Maj. MCKINLEY to have the Governor go up and fix them up. Afraid of Joint Debate. —To what straits Republican newspapers are reduced for mud to fling at BRYAN is shown in the latest attack of the Pittsburg Gazelle. It charges him with being a busi- ness failure. Democrats should not at- tempt to answer thisargument by shouting that MCKINLEY is another, even if he did fail, not more than three years ago, for over $100,000. Mr. BRYAN is a successful law- yer, the best proof of which is the fact that a large railroad corporation recently offered Li Slo year th Sige Pas BELL came in contact on the stump several road campanies are in the Rbit of employ-| vo;s 490 and he came out of the war of ing the BEST professional mep tobefound. | {oo very badly used up contestant —During the fiscal year just closed we | With the recollection of that rough ex- exported products to the alue of $880,- | perience still lingering in his mind, it is 000,000 and imported to the value of $780,- | not surprising that he should refuse to 000,000, a favorable balance of $100,000,- | meet another antagonist, whose ability 000 for us. During the fiscal year of 1893, | would be likely to inflict a worse drubbing the most prosperous period of the McKIN- | than that which he sustained at the hands LEY tariff, and eight months of which was | of ex-Governor CAMPBELL. under HARRISON'S administration we ex- It will be far safer for the major to re- ported to the value of $847,665,194 and | main in Canton and address delegations of imported to the value of $866, 400,922 an | tariff devotees and admiring lady visitors adverse balance, for us, of $18,735,728. | from his front door-step. Not only is the How about that necessary protection to | cause of the trusts and the’ Wall street home industries? The WILsoN bill seems ning on pas wens ORy MMi pe => 3% to give more than MCKINLEY’S pet meas- | counter the forceful logic and vigorous ure did, without extorting robber tariffs. eloquence of the Democratic candidate. There are no doubt prudential reasons for a special dispatch from MARK HANNA'S headquarters at Cleveland, which says: «It is well understood here that MCKIN- LEY will refuse to hold any joint debate with BRYAN.” The major is evidently shy of an en- counter with the young orator, and there is good cause for his shyness. He is not particularly strong in a joint discussion, as was shown when he and ex-Gov- CAMP- The Aspersion of the Chicago Convention. It will not be long before those who have been using vile terms in stigmatizing the Chicago convention, and have charac- terized it as being composed of disreputa- ble and dangerous elements, will find that they have made a mistake which will re- turn with damaging effect upon themselves. They will suffer the consequences of having slandered the bone and sinew, the heart and conscience, the patriotic in- stinet and rugged intelligence of the Ameri- can people. Some of those hasty revilers, who pict- ured the greatest national convention that was ever held on this continent, as a set of “fanatical cranks’ and ‘evil minded anar- chists’’ are already endeavoring to make antends for so vile a misrepresentation. As a sample of such retraction we may mention the New York Post, a leading organ of the gold interest, which says : ‘The sound mon- ey men must not stand off and call the peo- ple who are inclined to favor free coinage anarchists, blatherskites and fools,” and of the convention it says : “The Chicago convention had its ALTGELD and its TILLMAN, it is true, but an intelli- gent eastern observer, who has attended these national gatherin for many years, tes- tifies, in the Springfield (Mass.) Republican that : ‘‘the men composing the convention were in the main representatives of an hon- est and reputable citizenship—men more ac- customed to the prayer meeting and the church than to the barroom and the club.” How do the howling tirades about ‘‘an- archists’” and fanatics, as the constituent element of the convention, compare with this admis8ion of the high moral and re- ligious character of the men who mainly composed that gathering? Nothing could be more natural than that a high order of moral character should prevail ina body that was largely drawn from the farmers of the western and southern sections of the country. Will not the slanderous asper- sion of such a representative hody bring shame and punishment to those who have been guilty of it. 7 If further testimony as to the pure mo- tives and honest purpose of the Chicago convention be needed we can give that which is furnished by Hon. JOHN RUSSELL Young, a distinguished Republican of Philadelphia, who personally attended its proceedings. Speaking of it he says : «This has not been a mercenary body. You did not feel the presence of money. The delegates were too earnest, toc serious, and not the kind of people susceptible to money influences. A gifted friend of mine said on the first day of the convention that it was a battle between ROTHSCHILDS and BLAND, and that if BLAND were beaten RoTHSCHILDS would win. When the nomi- nation was made he leaned over my shoulder and said : “The ROTHSCHILDS are beaten.” ® And is it not because the ROTHSCHILDS were beaten that the minions of the money power are hurling such epithets as ‘‘blath- erskites,’”” ‘‘lunatics” “revolutionists’’ and “‘anarchists’’ at the sensible, true and honest men who won so glorious a victory ? The Full Dollar. It would be interesting to know what candidate MCKINLEY means by a “full dollar.” In one of his speeches to the crowds that are visiting him at Canton he remarked, after his usual blather about the benefits of protection, ‘‘and my country- men, there is another thing the people are determined upon and that is that a full day’s work must be paid in a full dollar.” What does MCKINLEY consider a full dollar? When he was a Congressman he voted that there should be four and a half million dollars coined every month, and the product of the BLAND coinage bill, which he supported with his vote, was over four hundred million dollars, all silver. Are these to be considered as among the «gull dollars’ in which a full day’s work must be paid? Having been instrumental in their creation does he regard them as having the full purchasing power of any other dollar, or would it be defrauding labor to pay it with this kind of dollars? But candidate MCKINLEY'’S party has put him on a platform which demands dol- lars of quite a different kind. It declares that those which he helped to create by the millions are dishonest ; that they are worth only about fifty cents, and that to pay labor in them is to defraud it. The Republican candidate should be more explicit in declaring which kind of a dollar should be used for the payment of a full day’s work ; whether the silver dollar which he favored when he voted for the BLAND bill, or the gold” dollar which is the favorite coin of the Wall street and is demanded by the platform on which the t‘gold-bugs’’ have placed him, apparently againt his will. The major did _ considerable straddling beforeshis nomination, but he should now stop acting the straddle-bug. —The Populists and Silver people are having a great time at St. Louis. The ‘keep in the middle of the road’? fellows are not in favor of endorsing BRYAN and SEWALL, but indications point to their running off into the hye-ways and hedges | before they get through. o Misrepresentation of the Democratic Platform. Those who represent the Chicago plat- form as inculcating revolutionary and dan- gerous doctrines know they are guilty of gross and unworthy misrepresentation. That platform re-affirms the Democratic doctrine that a tariff should be for the pur- pose of revenue only and not for the object of favoring special interests. There is no- thing revolutionary or incendiary in such a proposition. It is but the maintenance of the old Democratic principle of the greatest good to the greatest number. There is nothing dangerous in the re-affirmation of the doctrine that a special benefit is not the kind of protection that is best for gen- eral interests, nor is there anything an- archical in the declaration of the platform that “we hold that the most efficient way of protecting American labor is to prevent the importation of foreign pauper labor to compete with the home market.’ This is the kind of protection that pro- tects, and is more calculated to prevent than to encourage anarchy. The platform especially insists upon economy in the administration of the gov- ernment, and reproves the profligate ex- travagance which has characterized Repub- lican administration. Is this a dangerous declaration? Does it indicate the reckless spirit of the mob to denounce the abuses of Republican rule ? It is particularly insisted that an anarchic- al spirit is displayed in the platform’s protest against arbitrary federal inter- ference with local affairs. But this expres- sion is neither new, nor is it revolutionary or anarchisti¢ in its intent. It is but a re-iteration of the old Democratic doctrine of the right of local self-government— doctrine as old as the party itself. It was this doctrine that always arrayed the party against the invasion of the sovereign- ty which the constitution guarantees to every State. It was incorporated in our platfrom when troops were being massed throughout the North to defeat the gallant soldier, GEo. B. MCCLELLAN, in 1864. It was incorporated in the platform upon which the great SEYMORE, made his canvass in 1868. It was the slogan of the party during the re-construction days, when carpet bag governments were being forced upon fire people of the South, and it was this doctrine that inspired the Democracy in its resistance to force bills and -to every measure that threatened the constitutional rights of the States. If this