BY PRP. GRAY MEEK. Ink Slings. —TIs the Hawaiian question really a question, or is it only a bug-a-boo? —Resumed full handed’ is the most interesting headline in the newspapers just now. — Philadelphia thinks she has dollar gas in sight. Perhaps when she gets it she will be out of sight. —Congressmen who won’t keep their seats now should be remembered when they begin clamoring for a re-election, ~The Lord loves a cheerful giver, but not the hypocrite, who revels in giving advice which he does not follow himself. -—Bare footed boys are daily seen fish- ing along the banks of Spring creek. ‘We have been waiting patiently for the Republican to blame it on the WiLsoN bill. —Was thers ever a time when Gover- nors figured more in public matters ? PENNOYER, LEWELLING, MITCHELL and ATGELD are all up for a share of notoriety. —— If business keepson improving it will not be long until every manufac- turing industry in the country will be running full handed. The WiLsoNn bill is to blame for it. —The rarity of snow this winter has made times very hard for a certain class of poets, but while they may lose an opportunity to descant on ‘‘the beauti- ful”, the coming of Spring is inevita- ble. —Mrs. GEorGE GOULD, of New York, has just organized a society which will aim to refine the poor. A noble work indeed, for where there is refinement there society finds its truest types of manhood and womanhood. —Statisticians figure that the loss by fire in the United States and Canada during the year 1892 aggregated $156,- 445, 875. This sum does not include the estimated value of countless project- ed enterprises that ended in smoke. — While the board of manugers were debating as to how they would get rid of the World’s Fair buildings, in Jack- son park, fire solved the problem. But it did the work before the exhibitors were ready for it and many thousands were lost. —The first thing Mr. CARNEGIE knows he will bea Democrat. He is getting extremely Democratic in his ideas and this last bolt in favor of re- duced tariff sounds very mucn as if he would like to ally himself with the party of tariff reform. —If the Damocracy of Pennsylva nia is not thoroughly and harmoniously organized how was that JACKSON day banquet in Philadelphia and the con- vention on Wednesday, where so much good feeling was marifested and perfect unity of purpose evinced, possible ? — Has anything so childish ever been heard of as the silly talk of Republican bigots impeaching President CLEVE- LAND. His position on the Hawaiian question is one of the greatest dignity and ‘twas only bis masterful apprecia- tion of the situation that bas saved the honor of our land; which seems to have been held in such cbeap esteem by his Republican predecessors. — [t is a singular fact that while Mc- KINLEY was being inaugurated Govern- or of Onio, on Monday, there was a mass meeting of five thousand unem- ployed men being held in Cleveland at which the evil effects of the McKINLEY bill were being deplored. Hs is Gov- ernor now, but those idle workmen will have to whistle for the realization of the promises he made them last Fall. —The Baltimore Herald is anxious that Congress hurry up and pass a bank- rupt bill as it fears that the government may need it. The Herald is deliciously frank in adding its disapprobation of the pension frauds that bave been un- earthed in the Monumental city. With ten thousand fraudulent claimants Bal- timore does well in advising the govern- ment to legislate in anticipation of a financial breaking up. —The loss of the mental faculties is coming to play entirely too prominent a part in the fatalities of to-day. And the cause can be wholly ascribed to an un- called for modesty which tries to cover up mental weakness when the superior treatment of an asylum should be imme- diately cought, The loss of mind is a misfortune to which no disgrace can be attacked and the friends of those thus sadly afflicted should take prompt means to remove all possibility of danger. —The talk of returning INGALLS to the Senate will more than likely end in talk. There can be no doubt that on | the floor of the upper house of Congress | Mr. INGALLS was 8 man, who always | claimed and was given a lion’s share of attention, but unfortunately the same talent that made him the eloquent log- | ical debater made him a foul mouthed calumniator whose presence as his State’s highest representative in Con- , gress was offensive to the nation. Demacralic ‘ 4: mane STATE RIGHTS AND FEDERAL UNION. Zz, Ig 5 VOL. 39. BELLEFONTE, PA,, JAN. 12, 1893. NO. 2. Inconsequential Tariff Meetings. The Lewistown Gazeite no doubt thinks it makes a decided scoreagainst the WiLson tariff bill when it express- es itself as follows : “Not one mass meeting has yet been “held to urge the passage of the “WiLson bill. Scores have been “held to protest against the measure “Yet Chairman WiLsoN has the hardi. “hood to declare that the people demand “free trade “reform.” Our Lewistown neighbor makes a mistake in the above statement. There was one very great mass meeting in favor of such a tariff reform measure as is presented in the Wirson bill. It was held in November, 1892, and was attended by millions who declared in favor of a different kind of a tariff from the one which they then passed judgment upon, and which has since brought industrial and financial par- alysis upon the country. The supporters of the WiLsox bill can see no occasion for holding mass meetings in favor of a measure which an overwhelming majority of the peo- ple have enjoined Congress to pass. On this subject the only injunction that can be legitimately considered is that which eminated from the ballot box when the question was directly before the people. It is easy to understand how mass meetings against the WiLsox bill may be gotten up and by wnom they are likely to be composed. They are mainly made up of the same people who at the last Presidential election voted for a monopoly tariff and were defeated. Whatright have'they to a second hearing on a question which was settled at that time vy a popular | what | decision against them? With sense can they claim (hat the irregular clamor of mass meetings made up ul most eptirely of partisan materi: ], should annul the deliberate verdict of a general election ? Such meetings may also have a small element of weak-minded people who voted for tariff reform, but have since been bewildered by the calamity howl, and have been foolishly made to believe that the disastrous effect of Re- publican measures on the condition of business was the result of the Demo- crats getting control of the govern- ment. Mass meetings composed of such ele- ments can have no influence upon the question in issue, and are entitled to none. AT ACR When Grow Was a Low Tariff Man. | The Republican State convention, which met in Harrisburg list week, nominated GaLusHA A. Grow for Con- gressman at Large, as a representative high tariff man. In doing this the convention seems to have beer ignorant of Mr. Grow’s record, and the high tariff supporters will whoop it up tor him at the Feb raary election just as if he had been an original McKINLEYITE. We call their attention to a little tariff history in which their candidate for Congressman-at Large is involved. Io 1857 he was a Republican represen: tative in Congress from this State. At that time the low Democratic revenue tariff of 1846 had been in operation for eleven years. It had worked wonder fully well for the industrial interests of the country, but it was thought that it would do still better if it was made a little lower. Therefore a Republican house of Representatives, of which NatHANIEL P. BANKS was speaker, in conjunction with a Democratic Senate and President, concluded to reduce the duties of 1846 by passing the still low er tariff of 1857. Pennsylvania had always favored the highest possible tariffs and there fore all the Representatives from this State, both Democratic and Republi. can, with but a single exception, voted against the tariff reduction of 1857. Grow was that exception. The fact that he did not vote at all was sufficient proof that he had no serious objections to a low tariff. It is well enough to call thiscircum- stance to the minds of the people while Mr, Grow is being paraded as a champion of a high tariff protective system. —Furs and fur-be-lows are different things, but they both come high, . A Disgraceful Transaction. The manner iu which the Hawaiian government was overthrown a year ago furnishes a page to the diplomatic history of this country which future generations of Americans will not read with any degree of pride. It sup- plies a parallel to the dark and devious ways in which the English subvert ed the native principalities in India in order that they might be absorbed in the English possessions. Enough of the facts, connected with the Hawaiian transaction, are known to sustain all that President CLEVELAND said about 1t in his message, and to make it beyond question that the American Minister, sent to the Hawaiian government to represent a friendly nation, deliberately entered in- to a plot with a body of foreign resi. dents to overthrow the long established native government, and that he added to his oflense against the dignity, hon" or and good name of the nation he re presented by employing its military power in carrying out this fi'bustering enterprise. The haste with which the Harrison administration endeavored to rush the annexation of the islands, as the fruit of the wrongful transac tion, subjects it to the suspicion that it was a party to the plot. This outrage upon the reputation of the American nation cannot be justified | by the assertion that the Queen of | Hawaii is a black woman ; that she is "a dissolute person ; that she arbitrarily ! intended to change the constitution of STEVENS to overthrow her authoriiy were the most These are matters which righttully concern the American gov- ernment. Would the American Min- ister to Hayti, where affairs are in cannot her government acd that those who, were in the conspiracy with Minister | influential residents. | A Bit of Tariff History. The hope is entertained by the high protectionists that local interests may induce. some of the Democratic Con- gressmen to oppose the WirsoN tariff bill. This expectation exists particu- larly in regard to Democratic Represen. tatives from Pennsylvania, upon whom it is hoped the coal, iron and lumber interests of the State for whose benefit a high tariff is claimed, may have an effectin deterring them from voting for a reduction of duties. This appears to us to be a vain ex: pectation, We know of no Democrat: ic Representative who is afraid to meet the tariff issue which the pledges of his party have imposed upon him. They all understand the character of the clamor which the McXINLEYITES are raising, and known that it does not rep- resent Democratic sentiment. History teaches that so far as their individual popularity is concerned it is perfectly safe for Pennsylvania Demo- cratic Congressmen to vote for a rev- enue tariff. In 1846 when it was pro. posed ‘to reduce the Whig protective tariff of 1842, this State was in a fer ment of opposition to such a movement, Ail the Democratic Representatives trom Pennsylvania except Davip Wir- mor got scared and supported the Whig high tariff. But thanks to the deciding vote of a Pennsylvania Vice President, George M. Darras, the Democratic revenue tariff of 1846 was passed and it proved to be so benefi- cial in 1s effects that, as a party meas: | i i | | | | | ure, it strengthened the Democracy in this State. Davip WiLmor was re- { elected by an increased majority, and be continued to be elected as a low tariff Democrat until the slavery ques- tion landed him in the Republican par- ty. Under the revenue tariff of 1846 | Pennsylvania becauie confirmed as the worse disorder than in Hawaii, be justi- | arch, 8 fizble in plotting for a change of its government 2 The American people, | no doubt would possession of those Pacific islands but they do not want them so badly as to justity the Republican method of steal- ing them, McKinley Bulldozing. The enemies ot a Democratic tariff are resorting to bulldozing in their op- position to that measure. The news: papers are publishing cases of employ ers discharging Democratic work. men for no other reason than that they | voted the ticket of the party that pro. | poses to reform the tariff. This has occurred in a number ot instances in New Ragland, and there haye been some cases in Pennsylvania, but a very glaring case is presented in this State in the instance of the KEaAsLEY and MaTri