A N.iT'OA.iL PAPER, PUBLISHED WEDNESDAYS AND SATURDAYS ' ■ J [No. is 5 of Vol. IV.] Chief JuJtice Jay*# opinion, on the juejlion— ** whether a State be liable Wwßfued by a pri tau citizen of another State fW THE quelbion \*?e are now to decide has been accurately Rated, viz. Is a State suable by individual citizens of dnothei'State ? It is said that Georgia refofes to appear and anftver to the Plaintiff tit this a&ion, because flie is a Jover'eign State, and therefore not iiahU to such action,?. - In order to the merits of this ob- Jfijffrio'i, iet us enquire, ■P. In what sense Georgia is a Sovereign J. Wtetlier iV»WJit>» it *ith ! flfcll-.ft»vfr«jgi)tj[, • • ! 3- "WhctWr the Constitution ' (to ; Georgia if a party) %uthorifcs, fuel) 311 , jigsturt htfV. • Suabihty and Juiblc are words not in com mon use, but they concisely and corre&ly con vey the idea annexed to them. i. In determining the sense in which Geor gia is a sovereign State, it may be iileful to turn our attention to the political fituation v we were in, pr'or to the Revolution, and to the political flights which emerged from the Revolution. Ail the country now poflefTed by the United States was then a part of the dominions ap pertaining, to the crown of Great-Britain. Every acre of land in this country was then held mediately or immediately by grants from that crown. AH the people of this country were then, subjeCts of the king of G'eat-Britain, and owed allegiance to him ; and all the civil au thority then existing orexercifed here, flowed from the head of the Briti/h empire. They were in a strict fenfc jttlow fnfcjeCts, and in a variety of respeCts one people. When there- Volution commenced,the patriots did not assert that only the fame affinity andfocial connecti on fnbfifted between the people of the colonies, which fuMifted between the people of Gaul, Britain, and Spain, while Roman provinces, viz. only that affinity and social connection which result from the mere cirtumftance of being governed by the fame prince—different idea? prevailed, and gave occaiion to the Con gress of 1774 and 1775. The revo4utron, or rather the declaration of Independence, found the people already uni ted for general purposes, and at the fame time providing for their more domestic con cerns by State conventions, and other tem porary arrangements. Prom the crown of Great-Britain, the sove reignty of their country pafi'ed to the people of it—and it was then not an uncommon opinion, that the unappropriated lands which belonged to that crown, palled not to the peo ple of the colony or States within whose li mits they were fltuat;ed, but to the whole people—on what ever principles this opinion Felted, it did give way to the other, and thirteen fovereigntie* were confdered as from the principles ps the revolu tion, combined with local convenience and considerations—the people nevertheless con tinued to consider themselves, in a national point of view, as one people ; and they eon tinged without interruption to manage their national concerns accordingly—Afterwards, in the hqny of the war, and in th<* warmth of mutual confide >ce,tbey mi de a confederation of lite States the balls of a general govern ment. Experience disappointed the expect ations they had formed from it; and then the jxjople, in their collective and national ca pacity, eftabli flied the pre fen t Constitution. It is remarkable that in establishing.it, the people exerciftd their own rights, ai)d their own proper sovereignty, and cgnftious of the plenitude of it, they declared ivith becoming dignity, •' We the Pea pic of the United > rates, 44 da ordain and etlablilh this Constitution," H'*re we fee the people acting as fove reigns »f the whole, country ; and in the language of fevereigiity, a Constitution by :li it was their will, that the state govern. lbould be bound, and to »hich the State Constitutions thou Id be made to conform. Every State Constitution is a com past made by and between the citizens of a State to go vern themselves in a certain manner—and the Constitution of the United States is likewise a compact made by the people of the United States to govern themselves as to general ob. jedts, in a certain manner. By this great compart however, many important preroga tives were transferred to the national go vernment, such as those of making war and peace, contracting alliances, coin ng money, &rc. &rc. It then it be true, that tfce sovereignty of the nation is in the people of the nation, and the rellduary sovereignty of each State in the people of each State, it may be ui'eful to com pare these sovereignties with those in Europe, that we may thence be enabled to judge, whe ther all the prerogatives which are allowed to the latter, are also eflential to the former. There is reafoil to suspecT that some of the difficultiejfchich embarrass the present quef tion, ri epßoni inattention to the differences which fubiilt between them. it will be fufficieut to observe briefly, that Saturday, August iq, 1795. [Whole No. 44;.] the foverdiffntierin Europe, and-particularly in England, exill on feudal principle* T|*at fyfteui conlklei s the ptince -is. the foreign, ajid theP'eopfe as his {vl'jcfis—it? regards .his person j as the object of allegiance, and excludes the idea of his being' on an equal footln'g witft a fubjeft, either in a court of justice or efle where. That system contemplates him as be ing the fountain of honor and authority •; and from his grace and grant derives aJI franc-hiies, immunities and privileges —it is cafv to per ceive that' such a Tovefeijfn could -ct i>e a«v«e- Y.aßlfc t«> a court of jurticV, or fTibje&ed to jifdicial control? *• ami atfHtal confttomt. It was ofuecefiity, therefore, tfrat Inability became incompatible witivfuch jCbv eieignty. Bef.des, the N prince having 3JI the executive powers, the judgment of the courts would, 1,1 fae No luch ideas ob* tain here-—At the revolution, the foyereigiity devolved on the people ; ;.u;J they ftt> 1 y < tl)e sovereigns of the country—but tnen t:vy are wVwt -Jmjc&'s (unless the Af rican slaves among us may be tb catted)—-;»nd have none to govern but ihonjcivei—the citi zens of America are equal as and as joint tenants in the sovereignty. From the differences exiftirg between feu dal sovereigns, and governments founded on compacts, it neceflarily follows that their ref peefcive, prerogatives mud alio differ. Sovereignly is the rijsht to govern ; a na tion or state-sovereign is the person or persons in whom that ri»fides. In Europe the fover eigrity is generally ascribed to the prince— h<*Te it rests with the people—tliere, the fo vereiguty actually administers the govern ment; here, never in a single inftanee—our Governors are the agents of the people, and at tnoft (land in the fame relation 10 their fo vercign, in which regents in Enrope stand to their sovereigns. Their princes have ptrf&nal powers, dignities and pre-emirtencics—our rulers have none but official; nor do they par take in the fbvereignty otherwise, or iu any other capacity, than as private citizens. 2. The second ohjeCt of inquiry now pre sents itfelf, viz. whether fuibility is incom patible w th State sovereignty. Suability—by whom ? not a fubjeCt—for in this country there are none—not by an in ferior ; for all the citizens being as to civil rights perfectly equal, there is not, in that respeCt, one citizen inferior to another. It is agreed that one free citizen may sue another—the obvious dilates of jufliice, and the purposes of society demanding jt. It is agreed that one free citizen may sue any number on whom process can be con veniemtly executed—nay, in certain cases, one citizen may sue forty thousand ; for where a c just inve&ive against the Executive of the Union. —That he' d of fcrH>bler§ whose ebullitions have been lent forth through the continent, have worn thread-bare the infamous epithets repeated and r e-repeated against the officers of the General Government, without produ cing any of the diabolical cffe&s intended.— It might have been expe&ed that the illustri ous Washington would have escaped the fhafts of those traitors to the peace and hap piness of our land ; not from any regard they entertain for his eminent patriotism, and un paralleled services in his country's cause, but rather from a fear that an open and invidious attack upon the Chief Magiflrate of the Union, who lives in the hearts of his fellow-citizens, would give their infamous views a too pub lic exposition, and render abortive the object of their hopes—But as the great adversary of mankjpd, after deluding his followers for a season, it is said at length leaves in a lurch, so his offspring at the ptefenc day, after 497 ■■ 1 V I <5! " v '' 1 '■ r ."}, f~ ; li "White wirtl irft-ve Ift an nrtgWi»frfe- i*Sic, we are under no obligation to become parties to their con tentions— we ate not to imitate th ir manners, or to adopt their opinion*, if we wiih to consult either their of our ilUcrcfls. It would be a lading it n<»t a ruinous calamity, to permit foreign councils to rnake an iinp»efli.>n here. Every man ought to brar my against any with any coun try nii«-a(£ of being Ihe moll happv, would be the moil wretched under heaven, if once engaged in thole vindictive and lavage wars, which m all probability will ravage Europe during th«- pro sent age.- Wc enjoy ihe CnnffalaWm of believing the wilbes of this country to be favorable to peace, order and virtue—it rests with the good men to rcftrain the p<*fDons ot the few who arc to i bu lent." Foreign Intelligence, V I t N N A, May 20, SEVERAL Jacobin em ilia lies are among the Montenegrines, en deavoiingto propagaie their prin ciples among those mountaineers, and to induce them- to make an ir ruption into the Venetian and Auf irian territories. C A D' I Zf May 7. Fear ftiipt of the line have lately W«tt" ordered to be'fitted at Ferr*]. Tfcw makes the Spanifti naval force for fcrvicc ab«ut so fail of the Hm. • *4; f.STREET, m H. A DLL Vk I Upon ;he hi etirii frontiers t hete ave now 130,000 men, inclftfjve 1 he Viviana frigate arrived here this day from Vera Cruz, lalt frcm Porto Rico, where they had heard of lhe war.—She left in (he latter place the treasure, Vvhich is ;o be conveyed to ims ope by the San Pe dro Alcantara. This ireafur< is. Re- ported to be imoieiife. This very day I ike wife arrived the SiMi Pedro regittei' ship from Li ma. She has on board • 1,545,593 hard dollars. A French prize lias come i'r here that is said to be very rich. She is tlie Archimides, of Bourdeaux,from the hie of France, bound to Pore L'Orient, and a prize to the Sp>oii J > ».»i .► I > W v