janfo the fatiij&clijn 'for the injury reficitca,' is aiwavs on the dejenfue. Then; are a great many vnjuJl'dMs which may kindle a war, and which- luwever are not the , war it felt"—as the ill treatment of a prince's ambaiTadors, the plundering of his fubje&s, &c." " If therefore we take up arms to revenge such an unjiiH aCI, we com.nence an off ' nfive butajuft wai ; and the prince who has done the injury, and will not give fatisfa&ion, jnnke" a defenfive but an unjust war." "We mult therefore affirm, in general, that the firft who takes up arms, whether jujily or uM/ufiiy, commences an ejfenjivc war, and he who oppofas him, whether with or without reason, begins a defunliye war." France then being on the ojfcnfive in the war in which she is engaged, and our alliance with her being defenfrve only, it follows, that the tafus foederis, or condition of our guaran tee, cannot take place; and that the United States are free to rcfufe -a peiformance of that guarantee, if demardod T''ofe who are dilpofed to juftify indiscri minately every thing n the conduct of France, may reply, that ih >ugh the war in point of form may be ofFenlive on her part, yet in point of princip'e, it is d*fenfive—was in each instance a mere anticipation of attacks me ditafed against her, and was jult fied by pre vious a2,gieffions~of the oppoiite pa* ties. It is b'-Heved, that it would be a ufiicient anfwerto th s observation to lay, that hi de termining the legal and po/iire obligations of the United Sta s,the o ly point of inquiry is, whether the war in fa I began by or byher ene.nes—' hat aM beyond tfii w >uld be too var-;u£, too liable 'o di'.pute, too uc 1 matter of opinio 1 ' i oe a f > oyer criterion o rational to >dufr ; that when a war Breaks out between two jation% all other nations, in regard to the poutive rights of the p* ties, and their p si ve duties toward; them, are bou'd to coniitier it as equally jult on both fid.' —that co' equentlv in a dejenfue alliance, when war is mile upon one of t : i; aliier., the other is bound to fulfil the conditions ftipu- on its part, v t lout inquiry, whetner rhc war is rightfully begun or not—as, on ?:he o* .er hand, when war is begun by one of the allies, tilt other is exempted f om the obliga tio ef lfifting ; nowever jnit the commence jnent of it m.iy have been. The foundation of this doctrine is, the -uti lity of certain rules for determining the reciprocal duties pi «atioris-»-that as littie »s polSSle be left to opinion, andto the fu' terfugejof a refining or unfaithful cafuif tly ; . - • .. . Some writers indeed of great authority af firm, rhjt ]t is a tacit condition of every treat of aNiance, t >at 01 e ally is not bound to afiilt the other in a war manifeftly unjust. But this is queftio.ied on the ground which has been stated by other refpeftable authori ties And though the ina.iifeft: injnftice of the war has been affirmed by lbinjy to be a good cauf- for not executing the formai obli gations of a treaty. I have no where found it maintained, that the jultice ofa war is a con fxderation which ran oblige a nation to do wnat its formal obligat >ns d 3 not require ; as in the cafe ofa dejcnjiiic alliance, to fu nifh the luccours stipulated, though ti.e formal ob ligation did notexift, by reason of the ally having begun the war instead of being the part-y attacked. Bnt if t ! iis were not the true doftrrne, an Impartial examination would "prove, that witl refpeft to some of t ie powers, France is not Wamelefs in the circumstances winch precedec and led to the war with t'.iofe powers; thai if flu eceived, lhe a!fo gave causes of of fence, a d that the juftite of the war, on hei fide, is in those caies not a littie problema tical. T iere are p u lential reaforls which difluade from going largely into this examination, un less it ihal! be rendered necelTary by the fu tue tii' n of rhe dift ufiioii. It will befn&cient here, to notice cursorily tK following tufts. Fiance co.nnitted an npon Hoi- Jand in declaring fiee the navigation oi the Sc'ieldt, and acting upon that declaration ; contrary to Treaties in which she had expli citly acknowledged and even guaranteed the exclnfive right of Holland to the navigation of that river, and contrary to the doitrines of the best wrners, and the eftabliflied of nations in such cases. She give a general and just cause of alarm to nation-?, by that decree of the 19th of No vember f 1792, whereby tbe Convention, in the name of the French nation, declare that they will g ant Jraternity and ajjijlance to every f topic who rvipi ro recover their liberty, and charge the executive power to lend the necef- A\ry orders to the generals to give aifiltance to such people, and to defend thoje citizens who may have been, or who may be vexed tor the caule oflberty; which decree was 01 dered to be printed in all languages. • Whim a nation has a&ually come to a refo- Intiou to thraw off a yoke, under which it may Have groaned, and to all'ert its liberties, it is juftifiahle and meritorious in another nation to afford afliltance ro the one which has been opprelTed, and is in sheaS of liberating itleJf, but it i% not warrantable for any nation bejore koud to hold out a general invitation to inlur feetion and revolution, by promising to assist ctery people who may xuijh to recover their li berty, and to defend those cuizcjis oi every country, who may have been i or who may be vexed jor the cauje of liberty' It ill le Is to commit to the Genkr als of its armies the discretionary power of judging, when the citizens of a fo reign country have been vexed for the caul' 6 oi liberty by their own government. The iatrer part of t'le decree amounted to what France herfelf had molt com p'jined of-**an interference by one nation in i*: -* iutevnal government of another. • Vatel juillv o'.;fcrv«-,, as a conl«]uence of li!»,-;tv and independence of nations— -1 - does riot belong t) P.nV forv-ion quiver to take cognizance of" the-adminiftratioYi -of thejovereiga of another country, to ler-himfMf up as a judge of bis cosdu&, : or to obiige iiun to alter it." ' . ' Such a conduct as that indicated by this decree, has a natural tendency to disturb the tranquility of nations, to excite fermentation and revolt every where; and thereforeju(li fted neutral powers, who were in a lituation to be aittrfted bv it, in taking me afu res to re pre(s the Ipirit by which it had been dictated. But the principle of this decrec received a more particular application roGreat-Britain, by some subsequent circumftarices, Among the proofs of this are two answers,' which were given by the President of the National Convention, at a public fitting on the 28th of to two clitivrent, ad dre'Tes; one presented by a deputation from " The Society for Constitutional Information in London"—the other by a deputation of EngJifh and Iridi citizens at Paris. The following are extra&s from these an swers: " The (hades of Fenn, of Hambden and of Sydney, hover over your head'-; and tht mo ment, wvjtout do-iht, approaches, in xvhich the French will bring congratulation 's to the National Conven tion of (treat-Britain." " Nature and principles draw towards us England, Scotland and Ireland. Let the cries of friend»h' p r-found through the two Repub lics." 44 Principles are waging war agai'ift tyranny, which will fall under the blows of ohilftfbpliy. fto\a/f\ in Europe is eirh r dJlro\ed, or on the point of perijh 'mg, on the ruins ot'fceo dalit 1 ; and the declaration of rights phc db\ the si le oj thrones, is a devouring fire which willco>J me th m.— '/OR.THY REPUBLICANS, &C. Declarations of this fort cannot but be con sidered as a d eel application of the principle of the decree to Great-Britain ; as an open patronage of a revolution in that country ; a ror.duct which proceeding from she head of the body that governs France, in the pre r enee' and on behalf of that body, was unquestiona bly an orfence and injury to the nation to which it related. The dec ee of the 1 of November is another cause of offence to all the govern ments of Europe. Bv that decree 44 the French nation declares, that it will treat as enemies the penp/e, who re/nftng or renouncing liberty and equality, are J /irons of preserving their prince and privileged cajis—or of entering into an accom modation with them y &zc." This dectte was little /hort of a declaration of war a".ainft all nations having princes and privileged chjfes. The incorporation of the ten ",^ OJ ies, over which the arms of France had temporarily prevailed, with and as a part of herfelf, is mo ther violation of the rights of nations, into which the convention was betrayed by an in temperate zeal, if not by a culpable ambition. The laws of nations give to a power at war nothing more than a u'ufrn&uary or pofleflo rv right to the territories which it conquers ; suspending the abfoHite property and $lpmi- 4 rtion til a treaty of peace or fometh'ng equi valent shall cede or relinduifh the conquered territory to the conqueror. This principle is one of the greatest importance to the tran quility and security of nations—facilitating an adjuft.nent of their quarrels and the pre servation of anc ent I'mits. But France, by incorporating with herfelf, in several instances, the territories she had acquired, violated this important principle and multiplied infinitely the oblfcacles of peace and accommodation. The roftrine, that a nation cannot consent to its own dfmember went, but in a cafe of extreme necejjity y immediately at tached itfeif to all the important territories : while the progrefiive augmentation of the dominions of the mod powerful nation in Eu rope, on a principle not of temporary acqui sition, but of permanent union, threatened the independence of all other countries and gave to neighboring neutral powers the juftelt caufeof umbrage and alarm. It is a princi ple well agreed and founded on the best rea sons, that whenever a particular nation a dopts maxims of conduct contrary to thofeV generally established among nations, calcula ted todiftm b their tranquility and to expose their fafety, they may juitinabW make a com mon cause to oppo.e and controul iuch na tion. Whatever partiality may be entertained for the general object of the French revolu tion, it is impofliole for any well informed or fooer minded man not to condemn the pro ceeding* which have been itated ; as repug nant to the general rights of nations, to fl e true principles of liberty, to the freedom of opinion of mankind : and not to acknowledge as a conlequence of this, that the justice oi the war on the part of France, with regard to some of the powers with which (he is en gaged, is from those causes questionable • iough to free the United States from all emb.tn aflfineAts on that score ; if it be at all incumbent upon them to go into the inquiry. The policy of a defenfive alliance is so ei fentially diftinft from that of an otfenfive one, that it is every way important not to con found their eifc-(sts. The fir ft kind has in view toe prudent o'ojeft of mutual when either of the allies is invo'untarijy for ced into a w ,r by t ie attack «f Tome power. The iatter kind fubje&s the peace of each ally to the will of the other, and obli ges each to pa' fake in the wars of policy and interest, as well as in those of fafety and de fence, of the other. To preserve their boun daries diftinft, it is necellary that each kind (hould be governed bv plain andobvi«>us rules. This would not be the cafe, if instead of taking the simple fart of who begtftlfe the war asagoide, it was neteffary to travel into metaphysical nicetics about the juitice or in justice of the causes which led to it- Since also the not furnilhing a stipulated succour, when it is due, is itielf a cause of war, it is very requifice, that there ihould be fome^>al- 455 J} -<-*e c! irerion f'»r nCcTtci'Tiirg tc'-fcH it h 'duf". • his e rite; :ni:, a- before obfer'vett, in a ti. ' U !iv e pUkinc* is tlie e>t or Hot; of t.'.e War by our aljy as a meie matter of inch Other topics calculated tp ilh.itrate the p»> litiorj that the United States are not bound toexeeute the clause of guaranteej are re served for another paper. Philadelphia, 5. To-morrow being the Annivrrfary of In. dependence, the Day wilt be celebrated the Union— v .P/f paranons are making at Graf's Gardctu -jfr re ' r ?fl*tn€f»w wtll be 'foaJnt'-in •hnndaricefor tHe numerous which are cxptf&ed to aflVmbleat thole delight-' fu! retreats. By Cdpt. Ede?, in the fchoonrr Dion, who arrived at Boston iaft week, in 22 days from Demaraia, we learn, that when pafling iht island of Maitinitn, he saw the white flying on one of the heighths—but the Enwhlh iuei,which ap peared round the island, would not peunit him to land. The Bank of North America has declar d a dividend oi fix per cent, foi, the hdlf year ending July 1 —to be paid atifjr. the 10th inlian'. A letter from Carlisle Penn ylvania of 2.> d nit- gives an account of a duel between Ma jor James Lamberton and Mr. John Duncan 5 the dispute originated at an election of mill tia officers, and terminated in the death of Mr. Duncan who was shot through the head. F.xtraß of a Utter from Bo(ion y June 23. " Bv arrivals from the Welt India liiands we find that t-he Teas iwarm with pi'ivateei ; and that aim oft every American \ellel is boarded, and on the least fu picion of their having Fiencheffects on board arc carried in to jort for investigation. A brig arrived to day winch bad been carried into St. K'tts and about hl'ds. r ugar, belonging to French wete det ained,though I believe tney are fiot yet condemned—and it is laid judg ment will be fu r pended till further o.ders from Europe—The Captain of this brig was was obliged to pay / 5? charges, and loft iiis freight, besides a detention of 2D days.— 'T s highly probable that this procedure of the British will be painted in ftio'ng colours by a certain class of*malcontents aiuon&tt us, but to avoid a mileonftru&ion of their con du& it ought to he known that the expenee and trouble that the American Captain was put to, arose from hi* prevarication, and putting the captors to the utmoi); difficulty in proving the property ; however I do no*t lup pofe that it depends on the whim or geneiofi ty of the captors whether we as a neutral power are not entitled to the freight ot the goods which has always been the custom of nations—it lb, I fhouid think means would be found to obtain it." Aii extfali of a letter from Man i? r/t tr -Wmlfnitn tr> Fhilsdei phia, as published in Mr, Duftlapf's paper of yesterday, fays—" '] his [speaking of England] is nndoubt edly the mop wretched country in the universe; and from its (ituaiion when you left it, though but four months ago, you can form 110 idea of its present diitreflcs. The war has caused so great a lcarcity of mo ney as was never before known,and has so completely deltroyed that confidence which is the life and foul of trade, that there are bul a very few mercantile houses in the kingdom capable of supporting their credit. On the 25th April a debate took place in tile Britilh House of Com mons, 011 a motion made by Mr. Sheridan, that the Houfe/houid pal's a Vote of eenfure, preparatory 10an impeachment against Lord Auck land, British Miniftei at the Hrfgue, for signing and prefeniing a ineino rial to the Mates General, which contains in fubrtance, a propofiilun for delivering up to the fwoid ot the law all members of the national convention who voted for the king's execution, which may fail into the hands of the combined poweis— This motion was finally negatived 211 to 36 —In thecouife of this de bate the partition of Poland was brought on the carpet, and tepio bated both by the Minister, Mr.Piit —and by the opposition. Mr. Fen no, / ohferved tn your Ufl a paragraph purporting that the iujtom liouje Revenues of the pott 0} London had jullev fijty per cent, in the month oj April; ■ike Jolfduiing article is a flat contradiction 0) that ajjeition ; April 30. REVENUE. Comparative totals of the several branches of public revenue, under the he; dsof cuftom<, excise, stamps, and incidents* for th© weeks ending April 27, 1792, and Apiil 26, 1793 : '79-- 1 "93- 224. 1251. 7s. 11 jd.—270,1481. 18. 6d. New Dutie;. » if. 3291.05. 0d.—12,1611. Bs. 7d. The above is given as a contradiction to fnme recent aflertion in the opposition piints, that the revenue fmce the commencement of war, ha-» been so much on ti»e decline, as to render tiie publication of any comparative rtatemer.t of it and the last year a matter of flism? to rV rn:: i t:ie country.- So JWv f'i< pears jt'roin the above statement, tliat there i more than 47,5331 in t pa.ed with tlie cyrrefyu Gold Coins of trance antt iipain t und Dominions, Spain. Grains. Cen'v. 1 3 z 7 3 ii 4 14 5 18 6 21 7 25 8 £9 9 33 10 36 11 40 12 44 13 47 M ■5 sf.5 f . 16 17 o < 18 66 ■9 so 73 21 76 £2 80 ? 3 84 24 87 PACI FIG US. *** TAPf.FS for receiving and pa\rnp Cold Cnim calculated 'by the Officers oj the Bat ;c of the United Strifes, agreeable to the new Law—from which the Grain labia above aye extracted- ma) be h<>d at Hen j vmin Johnson'j>, Huh Jtreet, near Fourth-JlreJ. The length oj 14 P»c finis" ozedfions x pifitonement of the Utter from B/rmingham, and yt trJavots till Ou* next. ARJIIVh iratt/ie ioj lL \ DM. PHI A. Biig Molly, 1. nfey, Cape-F'-incois M • rv, Whartorij Cdcht Srh'r K V t Bnntori, St. M I't ns Sloop Poll), Dawfon, S: Bartholomew* PRICE OF 6l UC 6 prr rc r.!?, 3 per C'tits, Deterred, Fall Ihdr s 3ank U. S BANK oj the UNI Ti.D STATES. July i ft ;nt, to Ihe S orkUnid' f* of iheir Rrpr« It* Itt 31 jvei ciu'y ( auih rized, FOURTEEN DOLLARS .»d FIFTY CENTS so» ea.ch SHajc, being lUe divi* dend declared for th last {\\ mon.n». By order, JOHN KEAN. Cafliicr. q>Jw INSURANCE company. Phi l adllphi a, July ill. 1793. NOTICE is hereby giv it to 'he mcmb is •he I r.i. „|He Coniirauy 0} M-orih A nerl* fa, that the D- t\ors have circlaml a d'viu< nd (to (liiti day) ol hfc p'T ceo'- on the antiouiit of 'he tilt instalment, and o! otic per cent p j monifr, on the sums paid towards the ficond and ihucj inftatntems, calculating horn the fiift day of the month following: hat tn whi h theft- pay* ments were marie. The D vtdenri will be paid o the Stockholders or'h 11 Reprelcn at»ves, tbe Company's Orficr, (\'o, 119. iouth F Street) at any "me »?tri he 711 nit. As th: member\ of this I onpahy are much difberfrd throughout tt c United fates, the Prwttrf in the J'everof state y are requejied tu 6we the übm c $ place in their utwjpater s. To Ke observed in Irani-fling BLumf* wilh the- Insurance Company OF NORTH-AMERICA ift. A LL or tit is lor I-ilurancc mull beg'ven jTx. tn wr tmg, fignrd by the applicant ; and as ta accepted at the office, and the policy mull ue lakrn up in ten day*. 3l the policy. For European r«fqu s, in fix monihi, F i India and China nfquts, in 12 months. For rifquea by 'he year, m tight inQo'.h), For nfques for fix months, in ionr months. A-d !or rilqoes lor any IcfiVr lime, in thice mon; hs. 4'h. LofTes will be paid in ten days after proof and adjustment ; but if the note given for the premium not have become dur w .thin that time, the amount of it (hail, iieveuhcltfs, be de duced from the loss to be paid. The Ihfurance Company of North-America hereby give notice to all w hoin il m y concern, that, agrcrably to the above rules, they an ready to receive ali ofdera tor inluiance, which may be addrefTcd to ihem, accompanied with dnec t:ons to some refponiVble house in Philadelphia forihe payment ot the premiums within the time limited. In cafr the rifques offered fhal! hr approved, the infuraitce ihall be immediately Ct t: ; othciwiCe notice (hall be given, eit he i L>\ anlvtci: to the- person applying, 01 to his «g<*nt, in Paiia* deJphia, as mav be orderrd. By of the i. i>t \rZ«Mv H A2.AKU, wfcC*ry. 4W J u! >' 3- or cf grc.*t regre? f can a ri ""Create, it ay e, wbicii is a i'uithiul is an actnr.l in create of :he pftfent week, com on«ing week lift yeafi r • 'ftd-Coini'vf Great firi lain and P^riu^al, v -oTaips." \ •" :j 3 i* 1 ' .1 ■ r ik ■• ' H -". 4» .*.; 7 ' ■. * \ .*!*' 9 " as 10 , 37 i» 4° ,8 • n 13 48 14 S x '16' 65 >6 - 17 : ■ «>a 18 19 7o *20 74- «* 7® 2* 81 >3 . ' *5 24 "9 ft. 17 8 ■ . fff't . . • - ■ioji '- > " 'g,, pttecjiv*4*. I Hf-M'.ZER HAZARD. Sec'ry. Rule s