PUBLISH II WEDNESDAYS AND - Vl"' RDAYS HY JOHtV FENNO, No. 6q. HIGH-STREET, BETWEEN SECOND AND THIRD STREETS, PHILADELPHIA. [No. 16, of Vol. lII.] FROM THE (BOSTON) COLUMBIAN CENTINEL Mr. RUSSELL, IN that part of Mr. Paine's pamphlet which he has chofeii to call the milcellaneous chap ter, he observes th t, " when a man in a long " cause attempts 10 Iteer his course by any thing " else than fomepolar truth or principle, he is Cure "to be loft." I have fought for the polar prin ciple to which his exertions were directed in this publication, and 1 must acknowledge I have fought in vain. His production ;s historical, political, mifcellaneons, satirical and panegy rical. It is an encomium upon the National Aflembly of France. It is a commentary upon the rights of men, inferring questionable deduc tions from unquestionable principles. It is a se vere satire upon Mr. Burke and his pamphlet, upon the English government, upon Kings, up on Nobility, and Aristocracy ; it is a narrative of several occurrences, connected with the French revolution, and it concludes with a kind of pro phetical iinpulfe, in the expectation of an " Eu ropean Congress to patronize the progress oj free go vernment, and promote the civilization oj nations -with each other." The objetfl which he promised to himfelf, in this publication, is not so dubious as the principle on which he wrote. His intention appears evidently to be, to convince the people of Great-Britain, that they have neither Liberty nora Conftitntion—that their only pofiible means to procure these blefiings to themlelves, is to " topple down headlong" their present govern ment, and follow implicitly the example ot the French. As to the right, he scruples not to fay, " that which a whole nation clioofes to do, it " has a right to do." This proportion is a part of what Mr. Paine calls a fyftetn of prin ciples in opposition to those of Mr. Burke, and it is laid down without any fort of qualification. It is not my intention to defend the principles of Mr. Burke•—truth is the only object of my pursuit, and 1 fliall without helitation relule my aflent to every principle inconsistent with that, whether it proceeds from Mr. Burke, Mr. Paine, or even from the illustrious National Atfembly of Trance. This principle, that a whole nation has a right to do whalfoever it pleases, cannot in any l'enfe whatever be admitted as true. The eternal and immutable laws of justice and of mo rality, are paramount to all human legislation. The violation of those laws is certainly within the power, but it is not among the rights of na tions. The power of a nation is the collected power of all the individuals which compose it. The rights of a nation are in like manner the collected riphts of its individuals ; and it mull follow si om thence, that the powers of a nation are more extensive than its rights in the very fame proportion with those of individuals. It is somewhat remarkable that in speaking of the exercise of the particular right offorining a con stitution, Mr. Paine himfelf denies to a nation, that omnipotence, which he had before so li berally bellowed. For this fame nation, which has a right to do whatever it pleases, has no right to establish a government in hereditary fuc cefiion.— It is of infinite consequence, that the dif timftion between power and right fliould be fully acknowledged, and admitted as one of the fun damental principles of Legiflatoi s. A whole na tion such as France, England, or America, can atft only by representation ; and the a