PUBLISHED WEDNESDAYS AND SATURDAYS BY JOHN FENNO, No. 69, HIGH-STREET, BETWEEN SECOND AND THIRD STREETS, PHILADELPHIA [No. 80, of Vol. ll.] Wednesday, February 2, 1791. The Tablet No. 155. (general subject continued and concluded) " The people of this country are employed in such a -way cis forrnt a charafler jjtojl compatible vj:tn tn: enjoyment of civil liberty." THAT a person fliould think favorably ofhim felf and his lunation, conduces very much to his acting with propriety and spirit. lhe fame remark may be applied to his political, no less than to liis personal tranfac'tions. It is of importance that a man, in order to be a Iteadj patriot, and a valuable citizen, fiiouM view the government under which he lives, with as much confidence and refpedl as it deserves. It his sentiments be strongly tinged with prejudices and suspicions, for which there is 110 real foun dation, all his e(Forts to pi eferve the government will be cold or petulant ; and he can never de rive pleasure by anticipating the prosperity of his country, so long as he does not believe it is in a jair way to pro/per. To have opinions well ef tabliihed, and feelings well disposed with regard to public affairs, one should not listen too much to the insinuations of men who are prone to pre- dict evil, and itnpofe censure, whenever they make public measures the theme ot their con verfition. There is ahappinefs as well as a util ity in having our opinions and feelings so justly accommodated to the state of things, that we may cherish no filly or ncedlefs anxieties about future contingencies. With this idea in view, I have employed the fix preceding eflays in a series of remarks upon the causes that operate te (ecure the freedom, and promote the prosperity of our happy country. It has been my intention to il lustrate, that these desirable objeifts retted on fucli a basis, as could not be deltroyed or shaken by casualties similar to those, which had over thrown the ancient republics. As the remarks and reasonings have not been reduced to any re "■ular fvflern, but have been communicated in a desultory manner, there is a propriety in my bringing them into a summary view, before 1 close the fubjetft. First of all, however, ft is incumbent on me to remark, that when 1 am speaking of the govern ment of this country, I have no fpecific reference either to the national or Stale authorities I view them altogether as forming one complete Government, ihe duty as vvell as the heft m terefts of the citizens are concerned, in having each legislature confining its attention to the objevS, for which they are now severally inftitu- But to proceed.—lt has been a leading idea in . thf difcullion of the present fnbjedt ; that, as , the character and ci.rcumftances of the people ot the United States do not relemble those ot any othe- nation, either ancient or modern, we can not fiirly make their cafe a precedent for our own. The occupations of men have such a pow erful .influence upon their moral character, that we havt only to know how the people ot any country ire employed, to ascertain the probabi lity, whether they will be molt inclined to a so ber and virtuous, or to a vicious and difordeily conduift. We must always look to the character of individuals, as anefleniial point to be regard ed in eftimatiag the chances that may afFetfi the welfare of the community. It cannot, indeed, too often be repeated, that the state of society, more than the form of government, fliould be contemplated, in ?.ll our hopes and fears, with refpeA to that propitious combination of law and liberty which qualifies the excefles of both. And, as theinliabitants ofthe United States have those employments and consequently those cha raifteriltics which form a good ftatij of society, may we not fafely infer, that we may escape those dilafters, to which the antient republics were | exposed, only because they had those employ ments and consequently those charadleriltics which form a bad itate of society ? Other remarks also have been made, to ex plain away the fears (ome people may entertain, left our encreafing wealth and luxury should prove ften render them troublesome to government ind they have more complaints to make aboul heir fufferingr than any other denomination ol leople. The reason of this cannot perhaps be riven in better words than tliofe of an honell Zhief Justice of the Delaware counties, and i jentleman of their own religions persuasion : < To admit the ufefulnefs of civil government o mankind, and yet to advance the polition that ill manner of force and felf defence is unlawful, sa fyftein full of inconfiltency and big with ab "urdity and - nonsense."* " A specimen r.f 1 think we iave in a memorial to Congress juil now pub irtied, by the yearly meeting at Philadelphia. In one part they tell you, that they are " more olicitous to promote the dominion of the prince * See the addresso f SAMUEL Chew, Chief Justice of Delaware, 'o a grand jurr, in the year 1741, reprinted 111 Aitken's Penn fyNania Magazine, for Auguil, i 775» P a g e 346, wherein the ar guments of Robert Barc lay aga.nft war, are examined and • efutcd. 725 HHso [Whole No. i 84.] of peace than to escape fufferings, Isecaufe ftrife ind contention are forbidden." In another, that they are conscientiously bound to refule pay ment of every sum required in lieu of personal service however laudable the purpose to which the money is applied." Now if they are bound to refufe paymeftt, is not this the fame as to fay that they are bound in conscience to escape fuf ferings, and to live in continual ftrife and con tention with government ? " That they should be indulged\n their notion which they fay they confcientioiilly hold, of the unlawfulnefs of war, aiul consequently exenip cd from personal service, is a dic'iate both of mo rality and of policy ; but that they should be ex cused from a cempenfation for personal service is not warranted by either ; not by morality be canfe it takes away from them the power of giv ing the only substantial proof of the sincerity of their religious fern pies ; nor by policy, becatife it (rives them an advantage over all other reli gious denominations, none of which are known in the constitution. Should they obtain the ex emption which they a: e feeking,the natural con sequence will be an increase of their party, for every cowardly or difafie