4 * P . ... .1 -■ . — PUBLISHED WEDNESDAYS AND SATURDAYS BY JOHN FEXKO, No. |vBROA'D-STREET, NEAR THE EXCHANGE, NEW-YQKK. [No. zo, if Vol. 11.] THE TABLET.—r-No. CXX.IV. *' A oftencr has tccafton to guide tht pub r .:c opinion, than to bt guidtd ,by it." IHAV.'J observed that there is a gajiera] dis position in legiflarfct's to consult and follow what they call the public opinion. Whether c'his regard to the public voice proceeds from a with to gain popularity, uu ,froni a real desire to promote the public welfare, is not material la the purpose of this eflay. It mult be prefunied that legislators acft with as much purity of intentions as other men, and that the tendency rather than the motives of their conduct ihould be made a fubjedt of examination. The frequent reference to the public opinion, in legillative afiemblies, seems to pre-fuppofe two things ; one u, that the popular sentiment is fixed, and cun he definit ]y ascertained ; and the other, that it ought to be deemed proper and obligatory upon the legislature Boththefecenclufions however Ihould be adopted under some iclh rdions. As I hive before touched upon this subject, in the 7th and Stli numbers of my speculations, I lhall be the less diffufe on this occalion. That the public opinion cannot be diltinguiih ed by unequivocal marks, may be jnK;j*re<) from its being quoted by persons, who, in the (amp de bate, are advocating oppofue fides of the quef lion. It is certain botli cannot be perfectly in the right ; and yet neither seems able to prove that the other is absolutely in the wrong. From this circumstance, I conclude that the public opinion is often too indefinite to be admitted as a rule of conducfu If indeed we are to jrT.her the public opinion by obtaining that of every indi vidual in the community, it would be not only ffn to the fcveral Ads therein juentiopro, in r-ei;>3& to the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. BE it mailedhvticSeijle mid Hats: d •?eprcfrttitivcs of (he Uni ted States of 4*ttlCtitt. £ait,rtt/t afjti hUd, Thai the fevcral and r(.if\c£h?c ilutus aui laid n» ,i"(t by the a& t intituled, 11 An aCi far laying a duty pp (*oor!s, \4trrs ->nd merchandizes im pottirtl into,the Unittß S;Mcs,'* an din c*vkl by the aef, intituled, " An att iiupofing and veirels which afirr the f a ,d d*y fh.vil he entered wit .in the said State ot Rhode-Jfljnd and Providen-e Plantauons, fubjeft to the exceptions, qualifications, alk>* <*oce» syid abatements in the said atts contained or which atUlhall be deemed to have the like 'force and operation within thr hid State of Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations, as elffcwhetc Wuhin the United States. And bf it further /na£UJ % That collision of- ihe said t here fhjlJ be m the said Slate oi Rhode-Island and Provi dence flirtation's. t4ro diftridts, to wit* the diitridfc of Newport, and the tiiftnft of Province. The diftnft of Newport thall comprehend all the waters, shores, bay*, harbors, creeks and in lets, tiom the Will line of the all along the fea-coalk, and noi ihwaid up the jr ragout, ! .i. 1. twit »»Ic-• !y Mnnimuut point at high water mark ; arid fhill inre of her debt assumed, than her just quota of the whole sum to be assumed, so that no other state will bear arly greater burthen on her account. The debt of New-Hampshire will not amount to half the sum of her quota, of ihe 4 bts proposed to be assumed, but i"he has been id favor of thcjmealure on principles of justice and national policy. But a very fallacious argument has been advanced refpefting the ratio in which some dates contribute to the common funds by way of import : And it comes with a very ill grace from the gentle man who advanced it, bccaufe it is so fully refuted by the report of a committee of the late Congress, of which rommittee, he was a member. It appears on the journal of the 29th April 1783, page 203, whereby it is (hewn that the several states contribute- by * general impo«t, in portion to the number of their inhabitants, whether the articles are imported, and the duties paid, in the state in which they are consumed or not, as the tax is ultimately paid by the confumers—(Here a part of the journal was read.^ 5, It is odjefted that it will be difficult to discriminate the state debtscontracted for the Union, from their other debts : But what neceflity is there for such a difcrtmmation, if only certain sums are assumed, and the states charged with them, the whole will be adjufL-d among the states 011 the settlement of their ac counts ; besides their debts for other purposes arc lnconfidcrablc. 6. Objection, if only part of the state debts be assumed, equal justice will not be done to all the creditors. Anfwcr, The small sums that will remain of the debts of any of the states can, and doubtless will be, as well provided for by the lefpeftive states, as those assumed, will by the United States. It is proposed to assume the whole of the debts, of the states ot New-Hampshire, New-York, New-Jersey, Pennsylvania, Deli waie, Maryland, Virginia and Georgia* and the small sums that will remain of the debts, of Maffachufctts, Connecticut, North- Caroling and South-Carolina, can easily be provided lor by those Slates. — j. It has been obje&ed that Virginia has made great exertions in complying with the specie requilitions of Congress, and in fink ing a considerable part ot the principle of her debts, since the peace, and therefore it would be inequitable to incrcafe her bur then by alfuming the debts of other States which have not made like exertions. The answer is, that it is not proposed to lay any additional bur then on that State. The amount of the State debis to be assumed will not exceed 23 millions of dollars ; the debt of Virginia to be assumed amounts to 3,681,000 dollars, which is something more than that State's quota ot the whole sum to be assumed, in proportion to its number of Representatives, so that the mteretfcof Virginia would be no otherwise affected by the assumption than by transfering its debt, from its particular fund to the common fund?. It is also proposed, to aflume of the debts of Connecticut end North-Carolinr, the just amount of their refpechve quous of the whole lum proposed to be assumed. [Whole No'i ; i'24-]