Can a general system (land with any punctuality upon such uncertainties ? Will it not be in the power of a fingleftate, by altering its own laws, at any time to disconcert the general treasury ar rangement ? Will the treasury officers ever be a-, ble togive an exadl account of the national re venue, in whose hands monies are, or whether in afafe situation ! I will propose a question which to the people is still a more serious one—Those public officers intruded with the revenue, and with the disposition of monies, ought to be placed in the most accountable situation ; from the inte grity of those now in office, we cannot infer the honor or honesty of their lucceflors; and will not so complex a plan as we are now considering, give the greatest room for evasion and fraud, that can never be detected ? Whoever considers these queltions, in fomeof thein, will find unan swerable objections, against Apportioning to the Stares, and adopting in each one, its own method of taxing and collecting. If neither of the above methods are feafible, the general goverment must adopt a system of its own, on plain principles, which may operate thro' the whole with equal expedition and justice. The greateftevil is to be expected from a plan which either gives difcretiojiary power to subor dinate officers of government, in dividing the taxes on the people ; or is so complex in its principles and operation that they cannot under - stand it. No good man will murmur when he fees himfelf treated on principles of equality ; hut lawgivers ought to remember, that for the common citizens to fee this, the mode of taxation mud be very plain. It is butafew, who have a thorough knowledge of the principles and influ ence ot the tax laws in their own States, and this they have acquired by living long under them. Should the general government adopt a complex system, by detaching the most eligible pans, from all the local customs within the union, it would still appear to the people a proper objeCt of jea lousy, and not feeing an equal operation on o thers, they would suppose theinfelves injured. If there be any kind of property which is the bafisof wealth throughout the union, and bears a near proportion to the ability of the people who must pay ; if this kind of property cannot be fe cretecl, and may be charged on principles of greater equality than any other,- if the nature of the propef-ty be such that every man may previ ously calculate his taxes, and detect an over charge; if it admits a more easy and cheap col lection than any other ; if its produce must forever be in demand, which will enable the pcrfon charged to pay his taxes; this property on some plain principles ought to be the subjeCt of direCl taxaation. PARIS, Nov. 5 r "T , HE final decision of the grand qneftion on X the property of the Clergy, wasagitated in no less than nine different Afiemblies, and has produced moll violent debates. The importance of the decision, brought back all ranks of people to Paris, and it was finally determined in the ful left meeting that has aflembled fincc the firlto pening of the States General, there being no fewer than 964 Members present. The Count de Mirabeau, clofecl the debate with the following pertinent remarks, temling to {hew the revenuesof the Clergy were the pro perty of the people. " These revenues fays he, have been given to the Clergy,either by Monarchs or private per sons, or purchased by them. If Monarchs gave them, in that cafe, they originally belonged to the people; if private peifons—they bellowed them on the Clergy for the use of the public worlhip, which belongs to the people ; if the revenues have been purchased, it was done with the saving of money, the amount of which be longed to the people. Thequeltiou was then carried in the following words : First, " That all the Ecclesiastical property is at the disposal of the nation, at the Charge of pro viding in a proper manner for the propagation of religion, co maintain its Ministers, and eale the poor, under the infpedtion, and conformable to the inftrutftious of provinces. Art. 11. " That in the dispositions to be made for maintaining the Ministers of Religion, no Curate Ihall have leTs than 1200 livers per annum, excluiive of his lodging and garden " In favor ofthe Decree Againlt it Majority The Caifl'e cl'Efcompte ft ill docs honour to its notes ; about 30,000 of them are daily paid ; they arc chiefly of 1000 livers each (about 40 guineas.) Foreign billsot exchange, and drafts, are generally paid at the Caill'e d'Efcompte ; bank ers have fentahnoft all their cafli to that bank. L O N D O N, November 9. The Imperial forces in Brabant under General d'Alton, have hung up every person they have found in arms. At Lonvaine, several ofthe In- fuvgents hnve been executed on a temporary gal lows. MR. fLKXO, IX looking over the letters I received a few weeks ago from Europe, I find one of my correfpor,dents has made fomcjlriflures on the debate.) oj Congref. As his remarks are diElated with candor, and perhaps may not bedecnea unintereflivg, 1 fend you an extradfrom this letter, which if you please \ou may ufert in your paper. %• New-\erk, Feb. 2, 1790, " DEAR SIR, " T THANK you for the news-papers you font me, containing the JL debates of Congress. Your Legiftature, in their firft session. made good progress. The most intcrefting fubjefts however aie yet to be brought forward. The present complexion of your pub lic affairs appears favorable, and it Congiefs in their fee on d feflion pursue their determinations expressed in the jirjl, your system wil be complete ; your friends in this country haveftrong expeftation that the American government will loon affumethc moil refpeft able eharaftcr of anv on earth. There are now no difficulties in the way. If your Legislature make the molt of their situation, your country will rife into honor and prosperity. " I have peiufcd the debates of Congiefs, with most critical at tention. They do honor to your Repiefentativcs, who genera Ih have given indications of abilities and integrity ; but I mull con fefs lam in some refpe&s a littlt disappointed. The debates dil covcr less independence of spirit than I expected from men so fa vorably situated for giviug scope to their talents : I will explain to you my ideas on this fubjeft. 41 In the firft place it may be remark'.d,that the speakers in Con gress have not yet acquired confidence in themselves ; They lp< k as if they thought themselves unequal to the talk they had to a - complifh. In many instances, we hnd good arguments loTe tht r weight from not being more confidently urged ; and the mem bers appear to want resolution more than feufe or honefly. They vi w their situation in a light, so new and untried, as to create a distrust of their own abilities to ast in it with propriety. This diffidence mav be commendable from the motive that gives rif< to it, but it will retard public meafurcs and beget unreasonable precautions. Your Legislators have good ground of confidence in themselves. The world think favorably of them, and believe them ccmpetent to the part they have a (Turned. " Another