poled on the latter. On this account therefore have little reason to expect that the Patowmac is more unhealthy. If we conlider their comparatiVe fuuation with refpett to the weft, the Patowm-c is almost ?s much farther weft, arit is distant from the oulquehanna—nnd we well know that generally speaking as we retire towards the western and high country, we are generally re moved from the caiifes of those diseases to which lower situations a /" e ej JP°j* ed - Asalfothetwo places are nearly in the fame latitude, the ojjectiou which holds with refpe&to southern climes cannot apply to one more than the other. It is only their western or eaft crn position, their remove from or proximity to the lower coun try, and to frefh or stagnant water which can properly be brought into view. It is not because we advance so much to the south that we advance to the centrc, it is because we go more to the weft. I do not know that there isa different of more than a degree and five or fix minutes between the latitudeof New-York and the pro posed place on the Patowmac. The advantage the Patowmac lias from its centrality, is derived more from its western than itsfoiithern position. 1 will not at present go farther in this argument, and flatter mylelt that the considerations which have been suggested will have their proper weight, and if they (hould becontradiaed, that we (hall he able further to support them. [Daily AJv ] Mr. Ames after some introductory observations, remarked that a certral fuuation is to be taken. He offered many reasons to shew that the centre of a fca coast line is to be regarded—ln substance they were because, it is more conveniently acce/fiHe, has more wealth and more people than an equal area of inland country. Be ing wore liable to inuajion, government (hould be near to protest it. It is the interr/l ol the back country to have the government near the lea, to mfpeft and encourage trade ; by which their abundant pro duce will find an export.—And lastly, he said the contingency of thejeparation of the western country was a reason for preferin- the lea coast. ° He proceeded next to fay There will not be any contest where this centre of the sea coast line is to be found. It falls be tween the rivers Patowmac and Sufquehanna. It will be found that there are good reasons why we should rather moveeaft than south If the sea coast line is to be prefered, it will follow, that the back lands weftof which the gentleman from Virginia has lo often taken into his calculations, will be excluded Thev are not peopled. They do not affect the sea coast line. And that line has already been voted to be the proper one by the committee •As it is true that the sea coast has more wealth and people than the inlandl country in propoition to the extent, it is equally true that the eaftcrn half of the sea coast has more of both than thefouthern 11 we reckon Maryland, which will be as well accommodated by the Sufquehanna as by the Patowmac, we lhallfind the popu lation of the eastern part nearly two millions and that of the louthcrn only one million. And the population of free inhabi tants itill less in favor of the latter. But, Sir infteadof seeking a centre geographically, we (hould conlider the centre of common convenience. That place is the proper one, where the greatest number of persons will be belt ac commodated. I will endeavor to lhew,that that will be on the Sufquehanna. Is the zeal of gentlemen who oppose this design influenced by their despair of removing the feat of government af terwards ? I believe the people of America will iiot complain of i • It fixed there, I think it will be found convenient and will remain there. Hie Sufquehanna is the centre of common convenience. At this moment, there ismore wealth and more inhabitants east than Jouth of it. But the future population of America is calculated, and it is pretended that the balance of population isreceding from the eall. Surely, the present inhabitants may be allowed princi pally to consult their own convenience. Weftofthe Ohiois an almost immeafureable wildemefs. When it will be fettled.or how it will be pofiible to govern it, is past calculation. Gentlemen ■will pardon me, if I think it perfectly romantic to make this de c on depend upon that circumstance. Probably it will be near a century before those people will be considerable. If we fix the national feat in the proper place now, it would give me no inquie tude to know that an hundred years hence it may be liable to be removed. But in fafl, the principle which is aflumed by the committee, and which I have attempted to juftify, of takinn- the centre of the sea coast line, will even in the event of that vast tract being fettled, furnilh abundant reason for its remaining on the oulquehanna. I will not recapitulate those reasons. We mull take some principle to guide u. : And though some inequalities will appear, yet let gentlemen remember, that in so vast a coun try, great inconveniences will attend the communications of the people with the government, be the feat of it where it may • And by taking the centre of the sea cost line they will be less than up on any_other principle. It will be found beftto accommodate the greatest number : Or in other words to be the centre of common convenience. Indeed this is not denied to be true at this moment. But the cafe is said to be changing. On the one hand, I think it is Utopian to calculate upon the population of the United States a century hence : And on the other, I admit that it is impolitic at lean, perhaps unjust, to confine our attention to the present popu lation : A quarter of a century may be a medium. Will gentle men deny that tradeand manufaflures will accumulate people in trie eastern States in the proportion of 5 to 3 compared with the iouthern ? Thedifproportion will doubtlefscontinue to be much greater than I have calculated. It is actually greater at present. ', c ' ,ma te and negro slavery are acknowleged to be unfa vorable to population. So that hulbandry as well as commerce and manufaaures will give more people in the eaftcrn than the southern State-. The very circumstance that gentlemen found tncir reasonings upon is pretty strongly against their calculation. ine> tell us olthevaft quantities ofgood land ftillunfettledm their itates. That will produce a thin population. For the old lands will not be crouded so longas new lands are to be had. , n j ' h r crtfore ' as we may be allowed to look forward, the eastern half from this central feat will be far more populous than the ether. In New-England the fettfed parts are laid to contain aoout 45 to a square mile. Much is said of the reparation of the western territory At a remote period, the jnnaion of the Britith colonies with the Union might be taken into view. The feat of government on the Sufquehanna will be nearly ac °y water to all the people near the sea coast. By Dela ware river on one fide and Chefapt ak Bay on the other. Let us next consider the inland navigation of this river. Pittf burg on the Ohio may be considered as the key of those waters • at least to the northward. It is a kind of common centre. Let , "s lee how we {hall approach it by the Sufquehanna. From Havre de Grace, at the mouth of Sufquehanna, ) and at the head of the Chefapeak to Wright's ferry is C 4° miles (And here the federal town propably will be.) To Harris' ferry, - . -20 To the month of Juniata river, t l'p Juniata river to the Standing Stone, Portageto Conimac, Old town, _ Down the Kilkiminetas river to the Allegany river 60 Down that river to Pitfburg, _ - ' 30 And from the supposed feat of government at Wright's ) '' ° ferry only - _ ° > 230 Let us compare this route to Pittlburg.with that by thePatowmac. From the tide water on Patowmac to Fort ) Cumberland, > 200 miles Portage to the three forks of Turkey Foot, . ,o Water carriage, and portage one mile, at the falls of > Yohiogany, - - _ > 9 Down the Yohiogany to the Ohio, . I'p to Pufburg, . 3°4 I have rcafon to confide in tliefe calculations. The latter is said to be made by a distinguished person whose authority no man will difpure. If it is true, or any thing near true, it will destroy the whole argument in favor of the Patowmac. I have consulted the bell informed persons out of the House, and believe the statement to be true, as it respects both rivers. If it is, the pondrous edifice which the gentleman from Virginia has erected with so much labor crumbles to powder. For it will appear, that it is more than 70 miles nearer by the Sufquehanna and Juniata to Pitfburtr than by way of the Patowmac. Neither should we forget that from the tidewater onthe Patow mac to Chefapeak is near 200 miles. Of course, the access by water is less convenient and direct! The eastern branch of the Sufquehanna is na. vigable to the head, at lake Otfego. A detach ment of Gen. Sullivan's troops came in boats from that lake quite down the river. This river flretches it's long arms and embraces a vast country, comprehending not less than twenty millions of acres. Let us next consider the connection through this water with the lakes. Its branches approach the Allegany river very near, and by a portage of only three miles communicate with the waters of Lake Erie. Reckoning from Fort Pitt, Lake Erie and its waters, and the several branches of the Sufque hanna,it will be found that more than fifty thous and square miles are accommodated with water carriage. Perhaps, out of America, there is not such ancther instance in the world. Yet this is not all. The water communication by the Patowmac is fubfervienc to the argument for the Sufquehanna. For if the western country is (o wonderfully accommodated by its waters that it is an high-way, then it is only 60 miles travel, a mere portage, to Wright's ferry. They will be on a footing wich those who come by sea, and they will have still greater advantages over many of those who travel by land. However, Mr. Jefferfon's account of the Pa towmac does notcorrefpond with the praises now bellowed upon it. He fays the fallsare fifteen miles long, and speaks very unfavorably of the interior navigation. In the i'ummer it's waters are very fubjev adopted. . . r e Mr.BußKr moved to insert the following o a . in the fame feiftion, viz. In cases of f