The RIGHT CONSTITUTION of a COMMON WEALTH EXAMINED. , [Continued from our NO controveiTy will be maintained with our author, " that a free state is more excellent than " simple monarchy, or Ample ariftocacy." But the queition is, What is a free state It is plain our author means a fiu«[le aflembly of teprefen tatives of the people, perioddiclially elecfted, and vested with the supreme power. This is denied to be a free ltate. It is at firft a government of grandees, and will loon degenerate into a govern ment of a junto or oligarchy of a few of the moll eminent or them, or into an absolute monarchy of one of them. The government of these grandees, 'while they are numerous, as well as when they become few, will be so oppreflive to the people, that the people, from hatred or fear of the gentle men, will set up one of them to rule the reft, and make him absolute. Will it be asked how this can be proved ? It is proved, as has been often already said. by the conlHtution of human nature, by the experience of the world, and the concdrreut tes timony of all history. The puilions and desires of the majority of the representatives in aflembly being in their nature insatiable and unlimited by any thing within their own brtafts, and hav ing nothing to controul them without, will crave more and more indulgence, and, as they have the power, they will have the gratification ; and Ned ham's government will have 110 security for con tinuing free, but the presumption of i'elf-denial , and felf-government in the members of the as sembly, virtues and qualitiesthat never exiftedin gieatbodi'es of men, by the acknowledgment of all the greatest judges of human nature, as well as by his own, when he fays, that " temptations " of honour and profit are fails to big for any " human bulk." It would be as reasonable to fay, that all government is altogether upneceflary, because it is the duty of all men to deny tliem felves, and obey the laws of nature, and the laws of God. However clear the duty, we know it will not be performed ; and therefore it is our duty to enter into allociations, and compel one another to do some of it. It is agreed that the people are the best keep ers of their own liberties, and the only keepers who can be always trusted ; and therefore the peo ple's fair, full,and honest confent,to every law,by their reprefetatives, must be made an eflential part of the constitution : but it is denied that they are the best keepers, or any keepers at all, of their own liberties, when they hold colleiftively, or by representation, the executive andjudicial power, or the whole and uncontrouled legislative ; on the contrary, the experience of all ages has proved, that they instantly give away their liberties into the hands of grandees, or kings, idols of their own creation. The management of the execu tive andjudicial powers together always currtrots them. and tlirows[the whole power into the hands of the most profligate and abandoned among them selves. The honelt men are generally nearly equally divided in sentiment, and therefore the vicious and unprincipled, by joining one party, carry the majority ; and the vicious and unprin cipled always follow the most profligate leader, him who bribes the highest, and sets all decency and shame at defiance : it becomes more profit able, and reputable too, except with a very few, to be a party man than a public spirited one. It is agreed that " the end of all government " is the good and ease of the people, in a secure " enjoyment of their rights, without opprellion but it must be remembered, that the rich are peo ple as well as the poor ; that they have rights as well as others ; that they have as clear and as sa cred a right to their large property, as others have to theirs which is smaller ; thatoppi eflion to them is as possible, and as wicked, as to others ; that Healing, robbing, cheating, are the fame crimes and fins, whether committed against them or others. The rich, therefore, ought to have an effectual barrier in the constitution against bein<* robbed, plundered, and murdered, as well as the poor; and this can never be without an indepen dent l'enate. The poor should have a bulwark against the fame dangers and oppreflions ; and this can never be without a house of representati ves of the people. But neither the rich nor the poor can be defended by their refpeooducM hours and peaceable indufirious citizens. 1 Education creates atmofl as great a difference t e . tween man and man, as there is between rational and irrational beings.—This is an observation that ever, f erf on makes, who contemplates charaners with a L degree of attention—Riches give impprtance, but J ver tnfptre refpeil—and may we not fupptfe the time ■will come, when their only intrin/ic advantage wilt it thought to con/i/i in affording more competent means for the acquifttion of science. The author of my motto has beautifully Jkttchei the. outlines of that pleasing, parental partiality, which fancies it fees the buddings of genius, and the presa ges of wisdom in the infantine prattle of its offspring he however cautions againjl trufling to early appear ances—it is true that nature mujt jbw the feed, lut culture only, can bring it to perfeflion. ' " 'T't education forms the man"—and the pa triot too. —It is necejfary in order to keep up afpirit J